
2025 Porsche Macan EV review – a good car, but is it a good EV?
More Videos
Published
2 months agoon
By
admin
Porsche lent us an electric Macan for a few days and we came away with plenty of thoughts about the already-popular electric SUV from one of the world’s most respected auto manufacturers.
Porsche’s new electric Macan mid-size SUV hit the road recently and is already quite popular, with the electric powertrain reportedly making up 44% of sales of Porsche’s most popular model in the US this year so far.
The company is actually preparing to discontinue the ICE Macan entirely – and already has in Europe. The gas guzzling version will remain on sale in the US through at least 2026, but the immediate popularity of the electric model will (hopefully?) make Porsche feel confident enough to push through the ICE discontinuation to the US.
So… how is that transition going? We got a chance to to test out the new electric Macan and tell you how it fares from the perspective of a longtime EV driver.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
For our test, we actually got the chance to live with two different Macan electric models for a few days each – the high end “Turbo” version in Copper Ruby Metallic and the lower-end “4” version in Ice Grey Metallic. Porsche also sells a base rear-wheel drive model and a mid-spec 4S model, with more power but not quite as much as the Turbo.


Between the two models we got to test a variety of the Macan electric’s options, which we’ll mention through the course of this review.
Performance
While an SUV isn’t a sportscar no matter what anyone says (the Macan EV is a 5,000-5,400lb vehicle, depending on spec, after all), electric SUVs can still perform quite well due to the extremely high torque that electric motors can push out and the low center of gravity provided by a heavy battery laid at the bottom of the car.

And the Macan EV is a Porsche, so you can expect it to perform well. We didn’t get to take it out on a track or anything (but lets be honest, even though it’s a Porsche, this car will see more grocery store parking lots and school drop-off lines than it does track days – likely by multiple orders of magnitude)
On the public roads we did test the car on, it offered more than enough power and great handling even in the lower 382hp 4 trim… and an absurd amount of power in the 576hp Turbo trim (both gain additional power in launch control mode – which will really throw your head back even with the lower-end model).
Frankly, I thought the Turbo was too much – despite not really being anywhere near the most powerful Porsche (that goes to the Taycan Turbo GT with 1,092hp), I still managed to give myself a headache with the violence at which it delivered power with a full stomp of the go pedal. The 4 or 4S would be more than enough for me, but if you’re looking to break some necks, the Turbo can get you there.
And, while the car hasn’t been out all that long yet, its reputation does precede itself. When I took the car to a weekend Porsche meetup (and was, perhaps surprisingly, accepted by the classic 911 admirers there), a man with his kid walked up and said: “hey, you wanted to see the fastest one here? Well, it’s that one.” So at least that battle is well and truly won.

The Macan EV has either 3 or 4 customizable drive modes (Normal, Sport, Offroad, and an optional Sport Plus mode), which is a feature seen on many cars, via a knob on the steering wheel.
A lot of cars merely change the throttle mapping between drive modes, but Porsche allows configuration of simulated motor noise (if you have the $500 “electric sport sound” option, which is a waste of money), chassis stiffness, ride height, and even changes the traction control to be a little more slippy in sport mode – though, I couldn’t find any way to configure steering weight. And you can set your preferences for each mode, which it will save. Once again, another aspect of the car that’s highly customizable.
Regardless of drive mode, the car’s handling was still excellent. I found it much more tossable than a car should be at that weight, and handling was predictable even on wet roads.
Differences between the modes are immediately noticeable – changing the “chassis stiffness” setting really does contribute to a much harsher or softer ride experience right away, and the sportier drive modes did feel like they allowed me a bit more slip.





We even took our brand-new Macan Turbo out to a local off-road trail to test the “off-road” mode (Porsche, you gave us a mode, of course we’re going to test it). The car performed admirably on a bumpy dirt road and some steep grades – but we didn’t dare take it into the wet, rock-strewn riverbed which was occupied primarily by lifted, beaten-up old Jeep Wranglers.
A quick note on regenerative braking
However, despite customizable drive modes, the Macan EV does not have customizable off-throttle regenerative braking. As is the case with many other VW group cars (but not all – the ID.4 now has stronger regen), Porsche has deigned to give us incredibly minimal regen strength (which the car’s included G-force meter helpfully told me tops out at 0.1G).
You still get plenty of regen when hitting the brake pedal, but these are blended brakes, where the car decides whether to apply regen or friction brakes. This means you can feel the transition from regen to friction brakes when you brake hard or each time you come to a full stop, which made each red light more abrupt than it needs to be.
While Porsche’s available regenerative braking force is high, I will continue to note that this is an inferior approach to offering strong off-throttle regen. EV drivers tend to love one-pedal driving, it’s one of the great joys of driving an EV. Also, having one pedal devoted to controlling the motor and another pedal devoted to controlling the brakes not only makes sense, it also makes the car’s performance more predictable.
The counterpoint would be that coasting is more familiar to gas car drivers (and also offers minor efficiency benefits – but if we wanted efficiency we wouldn’t make a 630hp SUV). But the goal of an EV should be to leverage the unique advantages of the powertrain to make it better than a gas car, not just familiar to one.
At the very least, there should be adjustable regen – after all, so much else on the car is customizable – but Porsche has offered only two choices: none, or almost none.

Efficiency & Charging
Over the course of my drives, I found average efficiency of 300-340Wh/mi, using a mixture of various drive modes. Most of this driving was in good weather, though I mixed in some off-road driving with the Turbo, and some rainy roads with the 4 (as a result, my least-efficient drive was on the 4, not the Turbo – due to rain).
My efficiency numbers would add up to a total real-world range of around 280-316 miles from the car’s 95kWh usable battery capacity, which is in line with the 288 mile and 308 mile ranges of the Turbo and the 4 respectively. Porsche told us that its range numbers are on the conservative side, but I found them to be pretty in line with my experience (and I tend to be a relatively efficient driver, so less efficient drivers may lose a few miles on me).

A (not so quick) note on charging
The reason I had two different vehicles is because, due to a series of unfortunate events, I was unable to charge the first one.
To make a long story somewhat shorter (just this section was 1,214 words before I trimmed it down…), a combination of bad charging networks, a communication error between Porsche and Electrify America servers, and bad charge port design conspired together to leave the first Macan I tested in my driveway with 17 miles left and no ability to charge before being sent back to a Porsche service center.
We ended up successfully charging the second loaner we got, which I’ll get to in a moment.
First, I’d like to mention that the Macan has a design feature that we at Electrek have long disliked – this plastic flap over the CCS portion of the charge port:

While this is normally just unnecessary and gets in the way of charging and turns a one-hand job into a two-hand one, in this case it also contributed to a physical failure of the car.
While the plastic bit is spring-loaded to flip up after the charger is removed, one time it didn’t. Then the electronic charge port door tried to close and got stuck on the plastic bit. Then the car detected an error and instead of opening up, it kept trying to shut over and over, and wouldn’t allow the other side’s charge port to be used either. (The Macan EV has two charge port doors, at the rear on each side of the vehicle, though only the driver’s side can do DC charging).
There was no solution other than to send the car back – or to break the plastic bit off, which I wasn’t about to do with a review vehicle (but if it were mine, I’d tear it off and solve the problem for good).
Once that was solved, when I got a second vehicle, the charging experience was actually great. The Macan EV can charge at a peak of 270kW (with best results starting at ~9% SOC), and when I charged it, I started at 18%. Charging was over 250kW at the beginning, and held above a rate of ~150kW until I finished charging at 73%. That charge took 17 minutes for 56kWh of energy and 162 miles of range. And the same car was at the front of the line when I left as when I got there, which means I charged faster than every other car at the station.
While any single one of my issues charging wasn’t necessarily terminal on its own (even the charge port issue was only caused because of the communication issue, which meant lots of plugging and unplugging), they all added up to a negative experience that could easily turn off a new owner from EVs for good. This is why it’s so important for EV companies to get charging right, and right now, Tesla is really the only one doing it right (well, Rivian too, just at much smaller scale).
In comparison, I have never had an issue at a Tesla Supercharger, other than having a wait a few minutes. Neither have most of our readers.
Porsche will likely gain access to the Supercharger network sometime this year, which should help to alleviate some network-related issues.
But for now, my main suggestion would be: don’t get the “power charge port cover,” a $580 option, until Porsche redesigns it or updates the car to have smarter failure modes.

Comfort & usability
The Porsche Macan offered quite a comfortable ride experience, particularly in “comfort” drive mode, which tunes the chassis for a smoother ride (and you can really tell the difference). Neither I nor any of my passengers had any comfort-related complaints.
Better yet, we also had the optional premium package ($3,900) and massage seat function ($670), which was very nice. I confess to sitting in the car for an extra 15 minutes on the last night of our test, doing nothing but getting a massage. It’s not the most comfortable I’ve ever been in a car seat (Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Faraday Future FF91 backseats get that award), but it’s definitely very close, and comparable to the most comfortable front seats I’ve been in (Audi e-tron).
The dash offers a good mix of physical and digital controls, with physical controls for climate and audio in particular.


But one thing I didn’t like was the gear shift lever, which is an up-down lever on the dash, like in the Taycan. I’m sure I’d get used to it over time, but it was a strange adjustment over my two weekends with the car. I also felt the cruise control/InnoDrive lever was placed too low on the steering column for those of us who use our knees to hold the wheel from time to time (don’t lie, you do it too).
The optional rear-wheel steering system ($2,040) has 5º of travel and offered a marked improvement in turning radius. I could really tell the difference between the car with it and the car without it – the turning radius was very tight for a somewhat large vehicle.


By virtue of being an SUV, there’s good storage in the rear, as one might expect. But the frunk is quite small – it came with a large bag to store charge cables (which are frankly bigger than they need to be) and had little more room than that.
Normally I would keep charge cables in the rear trunk under-floor storage, but that was also small, and mostly taken up by a subwoofer, leaving room for a small bag of car tools and that’s about it. So if you’re counting on a space to keep a bunch of things that you like to carry around all the time but don’t use often (e.g. a car cover or something), there are limited options in this vehicle.


Related to comfort: this car makes a lot of funny noises which were unpalatable to my ears (note: I do have exceptionally sensitive ears, so your mileage may vary here).
While the ride itself is quite quiet, this unveils a lot of sounds that probably shouldn’t be there. There’s obviously the federally-required pedestrian warning noise (which I think is misguided), but while regulations only require this up to 18mph, the Macan’s stays active until higher speeds than that (and seems to get louder as you speed up). That’s separate from the Electric Sport Sound, a $500 option for fake engine noise.
But beyond the intentional sounds, there are some other weird ones. The LED matrix headlights seem to make a buzzing sound any time they’re on, though this fades away when high beams are turned on. That’s odd. There also seems to be a fan that runs even when the car is off, though I don’t think it’s for battery cooling, maybe cooling the computer? Either way, it’s audible through the dash panel while just sitting there. There were several other funny unidentified noises, beyond the normal ones I expect on an EV (e.g. brake booster, battery contactors, battery cooling fans, etc.).
Technology
There is a lot of technology in this car, and cool user interface features. There are also a ton of add-on options, as is typical of Porsche.
Like many cars these days, Porsche allows connectivity with the My Porsche app to check charge status, activate climate controls, find charging stations and so on. This is a relatively new path for Porsche, and it sees the Macan EV as the flagbearer for its move towards more in-car connectivity.
The app worked well enough (on a chilly morning before heading to a car show I turned on the heater remotely, and the car got plenty toasty with just one minute or so of blasting the heat, which also turned on the heated mirrors), but the data on charger availability seems inconsistent between the phone app, the in-car navigation system, and the actual reality of the charging stations we stopped at. We also had trouble sending a destination from the phone app to the car’s nav system.
Porsche’s augmented reality HUD is amazing
The absolute coolest tech feature on the Macan EV is Porsche’s “augmented reality heads-up display,” a $2,520 option (exclusive to the EV Macan). Photos don’t do it justice, but I’ll include some here.
You’ve likely used a heads-up display before, which typically takes the form of a screen on the dashboard which is visible on the windshield, causing an illusion of floating letters in the air in front of you.

These often show drivers simple information such as speed, speed limit, and potentially directions from the in-car navigation system. Porsche can show those things, and also many others.
Porsche’s system takes this up to the next level, adding “augmented reality” features.

For example, if you are driving too close to a leading vehicle, it will add a yellow caution sign over the back of the car in 3D space to tell you back off (tailgaters, your day of reckoning… er, uh, visual clutter?… is upon you!).
But more importantly, it also tells you directions, and tells you directions exactly where they sit in 3D space (demo below, I skipped the turn because I just wanted to show the feature):
So if, for example, you’re coming up on a number of driveways and don’t know which one to turn into because your GPS just says “turn right in 300 feet” and you have no idea whether that driveway is 260 feet or 300 feet away cause who the heck can tell when you’re moving at a rapid pace in a big vehicle on a street… the augmented reality HUD will float three blue arrows directly over the driveway you’re supposed to turn into, and those blue arrows will appear as if they’re getting closer as you approach.
Even cooler, everything about the HUD is customizable. You can put the information you want where you want it, or take away the information you don’t want.
It’s hard to describe (hopefully the videos show it well enough), but it really does feel like a HUD done right. And it works with polarized sunglasses, which many HUDs don’t. Usually HUDs are invisible or close to it when wearing polarized sunglasses, which are a popular driving accessory to cut distracting reflections from the road and other cars, but this one is actually usable.
I had some minor quibbles, like I think the design and animation of the blue arrows could be a little different (especially on highways), and could see a dull glow from the corners of the screen on a very dark road at night, but overall this is the best HUD I’ve used.
…Its driver aids are less so
We got a chance to try Porsche’s InnoDrive driver assist system, which includes adaptive cruise control and lane keeping. We found the system somewhat cumbersome to operate and lacking in capability when compared to more advanced driver assist systems available from many other brands.
Other driver safety aids were appreciated. In particular, I liked the blind spot warning which utilized the in-cabin LED light strip, and the lane keep assist (which was active even when InnoDrive is off) intervened hard enough to actually hold me in the lane, even on a pretty curvy rural highway.

Lane keep assist did get confused from time to time when lanes ended or on highway exits, though, and required a little force on the steering wheel to overcome. This happened even when using the blinker for lane changes sometimes, which seems like an oversight. I hope that the high level of intervention and occasional confusion doesn’t result in people turning this off due to annoyance, since it seems like a useful safety feature, but an update to make it act less confused on merges and lane changes would reduce that annoyance.
Everything in the car is highly customizable
It’s not just the AR HUD which is highly customizable, but the whole car is. The car has a lot of settings and you can set all kinds of things just how you like them. It’s actually somewhat daunting trying to remember where all these settings are, and I was still finding new things until my last day with the car.
This is fantastic and I’m glad they offer this level of customizability, which is frankly more extensive than I’ve seen even in a lot of “software-defined vehicles” from startup manufacturers. (Although, we’d like to have more than one single “quick access button” on the steering wheel – it’s totally customizable, but there are so many options that it’s hard to pick just one – esp when having both forward/back would be nice, e.g. for skipping through podcasts).
But the user interface experience is still somewhat fractured – because Porsche has its own UI system (Porsche Communication Management, aka PCM), and also CarPlay/Android Auto, and also its own CarPlay app, which is not available in the Macan EV – yet? – all adding up to a total of 35GB of system software on the car, which seems like quite a lot.

This makes the UI experience feel somewhat unfocused to me, and in general, I’d rather have manufacturers just pick one and put all their effort into it. In the past, in-car UIs were terrible and everyone relied on CarPlay as a crutch, but now most manufacturers finally have acceptable UIs that I wouldn’t mind using, they just need a little more polish, a little more snappiness. (PCM also showed gas stations as points of interest by default, which is always a minus point for me, though this can be turned off).
But I don’t want to harp on this, because the level of customizability that Porsche offers is really exceptional, and it deserves merit for that.
Value
We’ve put this section last, because frankly, value is probably the last reason anyone is buying a Porsche anyway.
Starting at $75k base, the car is already close to not qualifying for the US federal EV tax credit (which caps out at $80k for SUVs). But that won’t matter to most of Porsche’s customers, who on average make about 3 times more than the personal income cap for the tax credit anyway.
The EV’s base price is about $12k more than the base ICE Macan, but across the board, the EV trims offer more power, better performance, and more standard features than comparable ICE trims. Some of these features include lane keep assist, the interior LED light strip, heated steering wheel, panoramic roof, and more.
And some exclusive options, like the augmented reality HUD, are only available on the EV Macan, not the ICE one.
Speaking of options, it’s very easy to go up from the base price, because like most Porsches, there is a vast array of options available, which can rapidly send the price up significantly.

We can’t possibly list all of these options here, so you’ll have to check with Porsche. A couple examples: a bespoke personalized vehicle key + key pouch, for just $770, or a carbon fiber case for your owner’s manual, for $790.
These options added some ~$25k to each of our tested vehicles. The Turbo was $105,300 base, but $131,970 as tested. The 4 was $78,800 base, but $102,320 as tested. Both had plenty of options, but were missing plenty of them as well. Clicking on everything I could in Porsche’s configurator, I found at least $60k worth of options to be added.
So value is a hard thing to examine here, and will depend highly on your option mix and each customer’s personal desires and financial situation. Porsche knows that it’s catering to a different kind of customer, and can offer bespoke customizations because its customers aren’t just looking for any Porsche, but for my Porsche.
What I can say is that there are definitely other electric vehicles on the market that can do a lot of the things the Macan EV can do at a lower price. But you knew that already, and if you were looking for that, you wouldn’t be at the Porsche dealership in the first place.
Conclusion
Porsche is convinced that Porsche buyers want an experience that’s just like every other Porsche. And Porsche fans are relatively famous for their resistance to change – there are still Porsche grognards who are dismayed by Porsche’s move to water-cooled engines, or to electronic power steering.
But Porsche’s first EV, the Taycan, has had an impressive record of bringing drivers over who are “new to Porsche.” So Porsche has an opportunity here to speak to new customers, who might be more open to new experiences.
Macan, too, has brought many buyers to the Porsche brand who might not have otherwise considered a Porsche in the past. It’s a more practical vehicle than a 911, and it’s a more reasonable size than the larger Cayenne.
So the Macan EV is a chance for Porsche to do something different, and I think they’ve missed the mark a little. I don’t think that making a better EV experience – in the form of stronger regen, or a more silent drive experience, or a less fractured UI, or not telling me by default where all the gas stations are (I know it’s small, but seriously how are automakers still doing this on EVs in 2025) – makes for a worse Porsche experience. You can have the excellent drive control that Porsche is famous for – and that the Macan has – while still fully embracing the electric experience.

And note that this publication approaches our reviews from the perspective of all-in EV fans – so we expect a lot out of our EVs. It’s not enough to just replace the powertrain, we’re looking for a complete ownership experience that stands up to the best out there – the Rivians, the Teslas, the companies that are all-in on EVs and really doing them right.
So like many efforts from traditional manufacturers, I see this as a transitional vehicle. It’s obviously not a slapdash first-generation effort like the compliance cars of the 2010s, it’s much better than that. But it feels like there’s still a step between the Macan EV and EVs like the Tesla Model 3, or the Polestar 3, or the post-refresh Rivian R1. It just seems like there’s still a little hesitance from Porsche stopping it from going all-in.
But given the immediately popularity of the Macan EV, maybe we’re looking at it too much from an EV purist perspective. Maybe it is indeed the right transitional path for Porsche’s customers particularly its Macan customers. I just tend to think that it’s better to make a car that doesn’t just happen to be electric, but that’s better because it’s electric – and really goes all-in on leveraging the strengths of the EV.
All that said, everything about the car is customizable, which is a really great thing to see from a traditional manufacturer. If there’s anything you don’t like right out of the gate, you can probably change it to something you do like.
And we may see more of the refinements that I’m hoping for on the upcoming Cayenne or Boxster EV – or they may even come to the Macan over time through software updates, which Porsche has committed to offering for its vehicles. Some companies have had trouble with software – especially VW – but Porsche has done some impressive software things itself, so we have some confidence they’ll be able to provide a consistently improving experience… assuming the Germans let Silicon Valley take the lead on such things.

Overall, the Macan is comfortable, extremely powerful, has great driving dynamics and an incredible amount of customizability. But I can’t help but think that Porsche still has one foot in the non-electric world, and could benefit from diving straight in on EVs.
The Porsche Macan EV is available now. If you’re interested in a 2025 Porsche Macan EV, you can use our link to get in contact with a local dealer and register your interest.
Charge your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
You may like
Environment
‘Bitcoin Family’ hides crypto codes etched onto metal cards on four continents after recent kidnappings
Published
1 day agoon
June 7, 2025By
adminThe Taihuttus on a ski trip to Sierra Nevada in southern Spain. They sold everything they owned in 2017 to bet on bitcoin — and now travel full-time as a family of five.
Didi Taihuttu
A wave of high-profile kidnappings targeting cryptocurrency executives has rattled the industry — and prompted a quiet security revolution among some of its most visible evangelists.
Didi Taihuttu, patriarch of the so-called “Bitcoin Family,” said he overhauled the family’s entire security setup after a string of threats.
The Taihuttus — who sold everything they owned in 2017, from their house to their shoes, to go all-in on bitcoin when it was trading around $900 — have long lived on the outer edge of crypto ideology. They travel full-time with their three daughters and remain entirely unbanked.
Over the past eight months, he said, the family ditched hardware wallets in favor of a hybrid system: Part analog, part digital, with seed phrases encrypted, split, and stored either through blockchain-based encryption services or hidden across four continents.
“We have changed everything,” Taihuttu told CNBC on a call from Phuket, Thailand. “Even if someone held me at gunpoint, I can’t give them more than what’s on my wallet on my phone. And that’s not a lot.”
CNBC first reported on the family’s unconventional storage system in 2022, when Taihuttu described hiding hardware wallets across multiple continents — in places ranging from rental apartments in Europe to self-storage units in South America.
The Taihuttu family dressed up for Halloween in Phuket, Thailand, where they recently moved homes after receiving disturbing messages pinpointing their location from YouTube videos.
Didi Taihuttu
As physical attacks on crypto holders become more frequent, even they are rethinking their exposure.
This week, Moroccan police arrested a 24-year-old suspected of orchestrating a series of brutal kidnappings targeting crypto executives.
One victim, the father of a crypto millionaire, was allegedly held for days in a house south of Paris — and reportedly had a finger severed during the ordeal.
In a separate case earlier this year, a co-founder of French wallet firm Ledger and his wife were abducted from their home in central France in a ransom scheme that also targeted another Ledger executive.
Last month in New York, authorities said, a 28-year-old Italian tourist was kidnapped and tortured for 17 days in a Manhattan apartment by attackers trying to extract his bitcoin password — shocking him with wires, beating him with a gun, and strapping an Apple AirTag around his neck to track his movements.
The common thread: The pursuit of crypto credentials that enable instant, irreversible transfers of virtual assets.

“It is definitely frightening to see a lot of these kidnappings happen,” said JP Richardson, CEO of crypto wallet company Exodus. He urged users to take security into their own hands by choosing self-custody, storing larger sums on hardware wallets, and — for those holding significant assets — exploring multi-signature wallets, a setup typically used by institutions.
Richardson also recommended spreading funds across different wallet types and avoiding large balances in hot wallets to reduce risk without sacrificing flexibility.
That rising sense of vulnerability is fueling a new demand for physical protection with insurance firms now racing to offer kidnap and ransom (K&R) policies tailored to crypto holders.
But Taihuttu isn’t waiting for corporate solutions. He’s opted for complete decentralization — of not just his finances, but his personal risk profile.
As the family prepares to return to Europe from Thailand, safety has become a constant topic of conversation.
“We’ve been talking about it a lot as a family,” Taihuttu said. “My kids read the news, too — especially that story in France, where the daughter of a CEO was almost kidnapped on the street.”
Now, he said, his daughters are asking difficult questions: What if someone tries to kidnap us? What’s the plan?
One of the steel plates the Taihuttu family uses to store part of their bitcoin seed phrase. Didi etched it by hand using a hammer and letter punch — part of a decentralized storage system spread across four continents.
Didi Taihuttu
Though the girls carry only small amounts of crypto in their personal wallets, the family has decided to avoid France entirely.
“We got a little bit famous in a niche market — but that niche is becoming a really big market now,” Taihuttu said. “And I think we’ll see more and more of these robberies. So yeah, we’re definitely going to skip France.”
Even in Thailand, Taihuttu recently stopped posting travel updates and filming at home after receiving disturbing messages from strangers who claimed to have identified his location from YouTube vlogs.
“We stayed in a very beautiful house for six months — then I started getting emails from people who figured out which house it was. They warned me to be careful, told me not to leave my kids alone,” he said. “So we moved. And now we don’t film anything at all.”
“It’s a strange world at the moment,” he said. “So we’re taking our own precautions — and when it comes to wallets, we’re now completely hardware wallet-less. We don’t use any hardware wallets anymore.”
To throw off would-be attackers, Didi Taihuttu encrypts select words from each 24-word seed phrase — then splits the phrases into four sets of six and hides them around the world.
Didi Taihuttu
The family’s new system involves splitting a single 24-word bitcoin seed phrase — the cryptographic key that unlocks access to their crypto holdings — into four sets of six words, each stored in a different geographic location. Some are kept digitally through blockchain-based encryption platforms, while others are etched by hand into fireproof steel plates using a hammer and letter punch, then hidden in physical locations across four continents.
“Even if someone finds 18 of the 24 words, they can’t do anything,” Taihuttu explained.
On top of that, he’s added a layer of personal encryption, swapping out select words to throw off would-be attackers. The method is simple, but effective.
“You only need to remember which ones you changed,” he said.
Part of the reason for ditching hardware wallets, Taihuttu said, was a growing mistrust of third-party devices. Concerns about backdoors and remote access features — including a controversial update by Ledger in 2023 — prompted the family to abandon physical hardware altogether in favor of encrypted paper and steel backups.
While the family still holds some crypto in “hot” wallets — for daily spending or to run their algorithmic trading strategy — those funds are protected by multi-signature approvals, which require multiple parties to sign off before a transaction can be executed.
The Taihuttus use Safe — formerly Gnosis Safe — for ether and other altcoins, and similarly layered setups for bitcoin stored on centralized platforms like Bybit.
Didi Taihuttu during a recent visit to Sierra Nevada, Spain. The family’s lifestyle — unbanked, nomadic, and all-in on bitcoin — makes them outliers even in the crypto world.
Didi Taihuttu
About 65% of the family’s crypto is locked in cold storage across four continents — a decentralized system Taihuttu prefers to centralized vaults like the Swiss Alps bunker used by Coinbase-owned Xapo. Those facilities may offer physical protection and inheritance services, but Taihuttu said they require too much trust.
“What happens if one of those companies goes bankrupt? Will I still have access?” he said. “You’re putting your capital back in someone else’s hands.”
Instead, Taihuttu holds his own keys — hidden across the globe. He can top up the wallets remotely with new deposits, but accessing them would require at least one international trip, depending on which fragments of the seed phrase are needed. The funds, he added, are intended as a long-term pension to be accessed only if bitcoin hits $1 million — a milestone he’s targeting for 2033.
The shift toward multiparty protections extends beyond just multi-signature. Multi-party computation, or MPC, is gaining traction as a more advanced security model.
Didi, Romaine, and their three daughters live largely off-grid, managing crypto through decentralized exchanges, algorithmic trading bots, and a globally distributed cold storage system.
Didi Taihuttu
Instead of storing private keys in one place — a vulnerability known as a “single point of compromise” — MPC splits a key into encrypted shares distributed across multiple parties. Transactions can only go through when a threshold number of those parties approve, sharply reducing the risk of theft or unauthorized access.
Multi-signature wallets require several parties to approve a transaction. MPC takes that further by cryptographically splitting the private key itself, ensuring that no single individual ever holds the full key — not even their own complete share.
The shift comes amid renewed scrutiny of centralized crypto platforms like Coinbase, which recently disclosed a data breach affecting tens of thousands of customers.
Taihuttu, for his part, says 80% of his trading now happens on decentralized exchanges like Apex — a peer-to-peer platform that allows users to set buy and sell orders without relinquishing custody of their funds, marking a return to crypto’s original ethos.
While he declined to reveal his total holdings, Taihuttu did share his goal for the current bull cycle: a $100 million net worth, with 60% still held in bitcoin. The rest is a mix of ether, layer-1 tokens like solana, link, sui, and a growing number of AI and education-focused startups — including his own platform offering blockchain and life-skills courses for kids.
Lately, he’s also considering stepping back from the spotlight.
“It’s really my passion to create content. It’s really what I love to do every day,” he said. “But if it’s not safe anymore for my daughters … I really need to think about them.”
WATCH: ‘Bitcoin Family’ tracks moon cycles to make crypto investment decisions

Environment
Morgan Stanley upgrades this mining stock as best pick to play rare earths
Published
1 day agoon
June 7, 2025By
admin
A wheel loader operator fills a truck with ore at the MP Materials rare earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, January 30, 2020.
Steve Marcus | Reuters
The rare-earth miner MP Materials will enjoy growing strategic value to the U.S., as geopolitical tensions with China make the supply of critical minerals more uncertain, according to Morgan Stanley.
The investment bank upgraded MP Materials to the equivalent of a buy rating with a stock price target of $34 per share, implying 32% upside from Friday’s close.
MP Materials owns the only operating rare earth mine in the U.S. at Mountain Pass, California. China dominates the global market for rare earth refining and processing, according to Morgan Stanley.
“Geopolitical and trade tensions are finally pushing critical mineral supply chains to top of mind,” analysts led by Carlos De Alba told clients in a Thursday note. “MP is the most vertically integrated rare earths company ex-China.”
Beijing imposed export restrictions on seven rare earth elements in April in response to President Donald Trump’s tariffs. It has kept those restrictions in place despite trade talks with U.S.
Trump removed some restrictions Wednesday on the Defense Production Act, which could allow the federal government to offer an above market price for rare earths. MP Materials is the best positioned company to benefit from this, according to Morgan Stanley. Its shares rose more than 5% on Thursday.
MP Materials is developing fully domestic rare earth supply chain in the U.S. and plans to begin commercial production of magnets used in most electric vehicle motors, offshore wind wind turbines, and the future market for humanoid robots, according to Morgan Stanley.
The investment bank expects MP Materials to post negative free cash flow this year and in 2026, but the company has a strong balance sheet should accelerate positive free cash flow from 2027 onward.
Environment
Tesla’s head of Optimus humanoid robot leaves the ‘$25 trillion’ product behind
Published
2 days agoon
June 7, 2025By
admin

Tesla’s head of Optimus humanoid robot, Milan Kovac, announced that he is leaving the automaker after 9 years.
It leaves just as CEO Elon Musk claimed that the humanoid robot is going to make Tesla a”$25 trillion company.”
Electrek first reported on Tesla hiring Kovac back in 2016 to work on the early Autopilot program. At the time, we noted that the young engineer had an interesting background in machine learning.
He quickly rose through the ranks and ended up leading Autopilot software engineering from 2019 to 2022.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
In 2022, he started working on Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robot program.
Late last year, he was promoted to Vice President in charge of the complete Optimus program, as CEO Elon Musk began to tout the program as critical to Tesla’s future.
Musk claimed that Optimus could generate $10 trillion in revenue per year and make Tesla a $25 trillion company. These claims are largely unsubstantiated as the humanoid robot market is still in its infancy.
Most market research firms currently estimate the size of the humanoid robot market to be in the low single-digit billions of dollars, with growth projections through 2032 ranging from $15 billion to $80 billion.
That would represent impressive growth, but nowhere near what Musk is touting to investors.
Today, Kovac announced that he is leaving Tesla for personal reasons:
This week, I’ve had to make the most difficult decision of my life and will be moving out of my position. I’ve been far away from home for too long, and will need to spend more time with family abroad. I want to make it clear that this is the only reason, and has absolutely nothing to do with anything else. My support for Elon Musk and the team is ironclad – Tesla team forever.
Kovac has been regarded as one of the top new technical executives at Tesla, which has seen a significant talent exodus of top engineers.
The company has made progress with the Optimus program over the last year. Still, many have been skeptical, as Tesla has been less than forthcoming about using teleoperation in previous demonstrations.
Kovac is not the only Optimus engineer to leave Tesla recently.
Figure, another company developing humanoid robots, has recently poached Zackary Bernholtz, a 7-year veteran at Tesla and most recently a Staff Technical Program Manager.
Electrek’s Take
This is a significant loss for Tesla. Kovac was one of Musk’s top technical guys and literally the head of the program he claimed would bring Tesla to the next level – although I think most people have been understandably skeptical about these claims.
I’ve been bullish on humanoid robots, and I could see Tesla being a player in the field, but it’s nowhere near the opportunity that Musk is claiming, and there’s also plenty of competition with no clear evidence that Tesla has any significant lead, if any.
In China, Unitree has been making impressive progress, and it is already selling a humanoid robot.
In the US, Figure has also been making a lot of progress lately:
I think it’s a smart space to invest in for manufacturing companies like Tesla, but there’s going to be a lot of competition.
It’s too early to say who will come out on top.
As for Kovac leaving, I’m sure his personal reason is correct. However, we often see people claim that and then they quickly turn up at another company.
If he believed that his product would soon become a multi-trillion-dollar opportunity, I doubt he would be leaving, but you never know. 9 years at Tesla is some hard work and it’s impressive for anyone. Congrats.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway