
2025 Porsche Macan EV review – a good car, but is it a good EV?
More Videos
Published
7 months agoon
By
admin
Porsche lent us an electric Macan for a few days and we came away with plenty of thoughts about the already-popular electric SUV from one of the world’s most respected auto manufacturers.
Porsche’s new electric Macan mid-size SUV hit the road recently and is already quite popular, with the electric powertrain reportedly making up 44% of sales of Porsche’s most popular model in the US this year so far.
The company is actually preparing to discontinue the ICE Macan entirely – and already has in Europe. The gas guzzling version will remain on sale in the US through at least 2026, but the immediate popularity of the electric model will (hopefully?) make Porsche feel confident enough to push through the ICE discontinuation to the US.
So… how is that transition going? We got a chance to to test out the new electric Macan and tell you how it fares from the perspective of a longtime EV driver.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
For our test, we actually got the chance to live with two different Macan electric models for a few days each – the high end “Turbo” version in Copper Ruby Metallic and the lower-end “4” version in Ice Grey Metallic. Porsche also sells a base rear-wheel drive model and a mid-spec 4S model, with more power but not quite as much as the Turbo.


Between the two models we got to test a variety of the Macan electric’s options, which we’ll mention through the course of this review.
Performance
While an SUV isn’t a sportscar no matter what anyone says (the Macan EV is a 5,000-5,400lb vehicle, depending on spec, after all), electric SUVs can still perform quite well due to the extremely high torque that electric motors can push out and the low center of gravity provided by a heavy battery laid at the bottom of the car.

And the Macan EV is a Porsche, so you can expect it to perform well. We didn’t get to take it out on a track or anything (but lets be honest, even though it’s a Porsche, this car will see more grocery store parking lots and school drop-off lines than it does track days – likely by multiple orders of magnitude)
On the public roads we did test the car on, it offered more than enough power and great handling even in the lower 382hp 4 trim… and an absurd amount of power in the 576hp Turbo trim (both gain additional power in launch control mode – which will really throw your head back even with the lower-end model).
Frankly, I thought the Turbo was too much – despite not really being anywhere near the most powerful Porsche (that goes to the Taycan Turbo GT with 1,092hp), I still managed to give myself a headache with the violence at which it delivered power with a full stomp of the go pedal. The 4 or 4S would be more than enough for me, but if you’re looking to break some necks, the Turbo can get you there.
And, while the car hasn’t been out all that long yet, its reputation does precede itself. When I took the car to a weekend Porsche meetup (and was, perhaps surprisingly, accepted by the classic 911 admirers there), a man with his kid walked up and said: “hey, you wanted to see the fastest one here? Well, it’s that one.” So at least that battle is well and truly won.

The Macan EV has either 3 or 4 customizable drive modes (Normal, Sport, Offroad, and an optional Sport Plus mode), which is a feature seen on many cars, via a knob on the steering wheel.
A lot of cars merely change the throttle mapping between drive modes, but Porsche allows configuration of simulated motor noise (if you have the $500 “electric sport sound” option, which is a waste of money), chassis stiffness, ride height, and even changes the traction control to be a little more slippy in sport mode – though, I couldn’t find any way to configure steering weight. And you can set your preferences for each mode, which it will save. Once again, another aspect of the car that’s highly customizable.
Regardless of drive mode, the car’s handling was still excellent. I found it much more tossable than a car should be at that weight, and handling was predictable even on wet roads.
Differences between the modes are immediately noticeable – changing the “chassis stiffness” setting really does contribute to a much harsher or softer ride experience right away, and the sportier drive modes did feel like they allowed me a bit more slip.





We even took our brand-new Macan Turbo out to a local off-road trail to test the “off-road” mode (Porsche, you gave us a mode, of course we’re going to test it). The car performed admirably on a bumpy dirt road and some steep grades – but we didn’t dare take it into the wet, rock-strewn riverbed which was occupied primarily by lifted, beaten-up old Jeep Wranglers.
A quick note on regenerative braking
However, despite customizable drive modes, the Macan EV does not have customizable off-throttle regenerative braking. As is the case with many other VW group cars (but not all – the ID.4 now has stronger regen), Porsche has deigned to give us incredibly minimal regen strength (which the car’s included G-force meter helpfully told me tops out at 0.1G).
You still get plenty of regen when hitting the brake pedal, but these are blended brakes, where the car decides whether to apply regen or friction brakes. This means you can feel the transition from regen to friction brakes when you brake hard or each time you come to a full stop, which made each red light more abrupt than it needs to be.
While Porsche’s available regenerative braking force is high, I will continue to note that this is an inferior approach to offering strong off-throttle regen. EV drivers tend to love one-pedal driving, it’s one of the great joys of driving an EV. Also, having one pedal devoted to controlling the motor and another pedal devoted to controlling the brakes not only makes sense, it also makes the car’s performance more predictable.
The counterpoint would be that coasting is more familiar to gas car drivers (and also offers minor efficiency benefits – but if we wanted efficiency we wouldn’t make a 630hp SUV). But the goal of an EV should be to leverage the unique advantages of the powertrain to make it better than a gas car, not just familiar to one.
At the very least, there should be adjustable regen – after all, so much else on the car is customizable – but Porsche has offered only two choices: none, or almost none.

Efficiency & Charging
Over the course of my drives, I found average efficiency of 300-340Wh/mi, using a mixture of various drive modes. Most of this driving was in good weather, though I mixed in some off-road driving with the Turbo, and some rainy roads with the 4 (as a result, my least-efficient drive was on the 4, not the Turbo – due to rain).
My efficiency numbers would add up to a total real-world range of around 280-316 miles from the car’s 95kWh usable battery capacity, which is in line with the 288 mile and 308 mile ranges of the Turbo and the 4 respectively. Porsche told us that its range numbers are on the conservative side, but I found them to be pretty in line with my experience (and I tend to be a relatively efficient driver, so less efficient drivers may lose a few miles on me).

A (not so quick) note on charging
The reason I had two different vehicles is because, due to a series of unfortunate events, I was unable to charge the first one.
To make a long story somewhat shorter (just this section was 1,214 words before I trimmed it down…), a combination of bad charging networks, a communication error between Porsche and Electrify America servers, and bad charge port design conspired together to leave the first Macan I tested in my driveway with 17 miles left and no ability to charge before being sent back to a Porsche service center.
We ended up successfully charging the second loaner we got, which I’ll get to in a moment.
First, I’d like to mention that the Macan has a design feature that we at Electrek have long disliked – this plastic flap over the CCS portion of the charge port:

While this is normally just unnecessary and gets in the way of charging and turns a one-hand job into a two-hand one, in this case it also contributed to a physical failure of the car.
While the plastic bit is spring-loaded to flip up after the charger is removed, one time it didn’t. Then the electronic charge port door tried to close and got stuck on the plastic bit. Then the car detected an error and instead of opening up, it kept trying to shut over and over, and wouldn’t allow the other side’s charge port to be used either. (The Macan EV has two charge port doors, at the rear on each side of the vehicle, though only the driver’s side can do DC charging).
There was no solution other than to send the car back – or to break the plastic bit off, which I wasn’t about to do with a review vehicle (but if it were mine, I’d tear it off and solve the problem for good).
Once that was solved, when I got a second vehicle, the charging experience was actually great. The Macan EV can charge at a peak of 270kW (with best results starting at ~9% SOC), and when I charged it, I started at 18%. Charging was over 250kW at the beginning, and held above a rate of ~150kW until I finished charging at 73%. That charge took 17 minutes for 56kWh of energy and 162 miles of range. And the same car was at the front of the line when I left as when I got there, which means I charged faster than every other car at the station.
While any single one of my issues charging wasn’t necessarily terminal on its own (even the charge port issue was only caused because of the communication issue, which meant lots of plugging and unplugging), they all added up to a negative experience that could easily turn off a new owner from EVs for good. This is why it’s so important for EV companies to get charging right, and right now, Tesla is really the only one doing it right (well, Rivian too, just at much smaller scale).
In comparison, I have never had an issue at a Tesla Supercharger, other than having a wait a few minutes. Neither have most of our readers.
Porsche will likely gain access to the Supercharger network sometime this year, which should help to alleviate some network-related issues.
But for now, my main suggestion would be: don’t get the “power charge port cover,” a $580 option, until Porsche redesigns it or updates the car to have smarter failure modes.

Comfort & usability
The Porsche Macan offered quite a comfortable ride experience, particularly in “comfort” drive mode, which tunes the chassis for a smoother ride (and you can really tell the difference). Neither I nor any of my passengers had any comfort-related complaints.
Better yet, we also had the optional premium package ($3,900) and massage seat function ($670), which was very nice. I confess to sitting in the car for an extra 15 minutes on the last night of our test, doing nothing but getting a massage. It’s not the most comfortable I’ve ever been in a car seat (Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Faraday Future FF91 backseats get that award), but it’s definitely very close, and comparable to the most comfortable front seats I’ve been in (Audi e-tron).
The dash offers a good mix of physical and digital controls, with physical controls for climate and audio in particular.


But one thing I didn’t like was the gear shift lever, which is an up-down lever on the dash, like in the Taycan. I’m sure I’d get used to it over time, but it was a strange adjustment over my two weekends with the car. I also felt the cruise control/InnoDrive lever was placed too low on the steering column for those of us who use our knees to hold the wheel from time to time (don’t lie, you do it too).
The optional rear-wheel steering system ($2,040) has 5º of travel and offered a marked improvement in turning radius. I could really tell the difference between the car with it and the car without it – the turning radius was very tight for a somewhat large vehicle.


By virtue of being an SUV, there’s good storage in the rear, as one might expect. But the frunk is quite small – it came with a large bag to store charge cables (which are frankly bigger than they need to be) and had little more room than that.
Normally I would keep charge cables in the rear trunk under-floor storage, but that was also small, and mostly taken up by a subwoofer, leaving room for a small bag of car tools and that’s about it. So if you’re counting on a space to keep a bunch of things that you like to carry around all the time but don’t use often (e.g. a car cover or something), there are limited options in this vehicle.


Related to comfort: this car makes a lot of funny noises which were unpalatable to my ears (note: I do have exceptionally sensitive ears, so your mileage may vary here).
While the ride itself is quite quiet, this unveils a lot of sounds that probably shouldn’t be there. There’s obviously the federally-required pedestrian warning noise (which I think is misguided), but while regulations only require this up to 18mph, the Macan’s stays active until higher speeds than that (and seems to get louder as you speed up). That’s separate from the Electric Sport Sound, a $500 option for fake engine noise.
But beyond the intentional sounds, there are some other weird ones. The LED matrix headlights seem to make a buzzing sound any time they’re on, though this fades away when high beams are turned on. That’s odd. There also seems to be a fan that runs even when the car is off, though I don’t think it’s for battery cooling, maybe cooling the computer? Either way, it’s audible through the dash panel while just sitting there. There were several other funny unidentified noises, beyond the normal ones I expect on an EV (e.g. brake booster, battery contactors, battery cooling fans, etc.).
Technology
There is a lot of technology in this car, and cool user interface features. There are also a ton of add-on options, as is typical of Porsche.
Like many cars these days, Porsche allows connectivity with the My Porsche app to check charge status, activate climate controls, find charging stations and so on. This is a relatively new path for Porsche, and it sees the Macan EV as the flagbearer for its move towards more in-car connectivity.
The app worked well enough (on a chilly morning before heading to a car show I turned on the heater remotely, and the car got plenty toasty with just one minute or so of blasting the heat, which also turned on the heated mirrors), but the data on charger availability seems inconsistent between the phone app, the in-car navigation system, and the actual reality of the charging stations we stopped at. We also had trouble sending a destination from the phone app to the car’s nav system.
Porsche’s augmented reality HUD is amazing
The absolute coolest tech feature on the Macan EV is Porsche’s “augmented reality heads-up display,” a $2,520 option (exclusive to the EV Macan). Photos don’t do it justice, but I’ll include some here.
You’ve likely used a heads-up display before, which typically takes the form of a screen on the dashboard which is visible on the windshield, causing an illusion of floating letters in the air in front of you.

These often show drivers simple information such as speed, speed limit, and potentially directions from the in-car navigation system. Porsche can show those things, and also many others.
Porsche’s system takes this up to the next level, adding “augmented reality” features.

For example, if you are driving too close to a leading vehicle, it will add a yellow caution sign over the back of the car in 3D space to tell you back off (tailgaters, your day of reckoning… er, uh, visual clutter?… is upon you!).
But more importantly, it also tells you directions, and tells you directions exactly where they sit in 3D space (demo below, I skipped the turn because I just wanted to show the feature):
So if, for example, you’re coming up on a number of driveways and don’t know which one to turn into because your GPS just says “turn right in 300 feet” and you have no idea whether that driveway is 260 feet or 300 feet away cause who the heck can tell when you’re moving at a rapid pace in a big vehicle on a street… the augmented reality HUD will float three blue arrows directly over the driveway you’re supposed to turn into, and those blue arrows will appear as if they’re getting closer as you approach.
Even cooler, everything about the HUD is customizable. You can put the information you want where you want it, or take away the information you don’t want.
It’s hard to describe (hopefully the videos show it well enough), but it really does feel like a HUD done right. And it works with polarized sunglasses, which many HUDs don’t. Usually HUDs are invisible or close to it when wearing polarized sunglasses, which are a popular driving accessory to cut distracting reflections from the road and other cars, but this one is actually usable.
I had some minor quibbles, like I think the design and animation of the blue arrows could be a little different (especially on highways), and could see a dull glow from the corners of the screen on a very dark road at night, but overall this is the best HUD I’ve used.
…Its driver aids are less so
We got a chance to try Porsche’s InnoDrive driver assist system, which includes adaptive cruise control and lane keeping. We found the system somewhat cumbersome to operate and lacking in capability when compared to more advanced driver assist systems available from many other brands.
Other driver safety aids were appreciated. In particular, I liked the blind spot warning which utilized the in-cabin LED light strip, and the lane keep assist (which was active even when InnoDrive is off) intervened hard enough to actually hold me in the lane, even on a pretty curvy rural highway.

Lane keep assist did get confused from time to time when lanes ended or on highway exits, though, and required a little force on the steering wheel to overcome. This happened even when using the blinker for lane changes sometimes, which seems like an oversight. I hope that the high level of intervention and occasional confusion doesn’t result in people turning this off due to annoyance, since it seems like a useful safety feature, but an update to make it act less confused on merges and lane changes would reduce that annoyance.
Everything in the car is highly customizable
It’s not just the AR HUD which is highly customizable, but the whole car is. The car has a lot of settings and you can set all kinds of things just how you like them. It’s actually somewhat daunting trying to remember where all these settings are, and I was still finding new things until my last day with the car.
This is fantastic and I’m glad they offer this level of customizability, which is frankly more extensive than I’ve seen even in a lot of “software-defined vehicles” from startup manufacturers. (Although, we’d like to have more than one single “quick access button” on the steering wheel – it’s totally customizable, but there are so many options that it’s hard to pick just one – esp when having both forward/back would be nice, e.g. for skipping through podcasts).
But the user interface experience is still somewhat fractured – because Porsche has its own UI system (Porsche Communication Management, aka PCM), and also CarPlay/Android Auto, and also its own CarPlay app, which is not available in the Macan EV – yet? – all adding up to a total of 35GB of system software on the car, which seems like quite a lot.

This makes the UI experience feel somewhat unfocused to me, and in general, I’d rather have manufacturers just pick one and put all their effort into it. In the past, in-car UIs were terrible and everyone relied on CarPlay as a crutch, but now most manufacturers finally have acceptable UIs that I wouldn’t mind using, they just need a little more polish, a little more snappiness. (PCM also showed gas stations as points of interest by default, which is always a minus point for me, though this can be turned off).
But I don’t want to harp on this, because the level of customizability that Porsche offers is really exceptional, and it deserves merit for that.
Value
We’ve put this section last, because frankly, value is probably the last reason anyone is buying a Porsche anyway.
Starting at $75k base, the car is already close to not qualifying for the US federal EV tax credit (which caps out at $80k for SUVs). But that won’t matter to most of Porsche’s customers, who on average make about 3 times more than the personal income cap for the tax credit anyway.
The EV’s base price is about $12k more than the base ICE Macan, but across the board, the EV trims offer more power, better performance, and more standard features than comparable ICE trims. Some of these features include lane keep assist, the interior LED light strip, heated steering wheel, panoramic roof, and more.
And some exclusive options, like the augmented reality HUD, are only available on the EV Macan, not the ICE one.
Speaking of options, it’s very easy to go up from the base price, because like most Porsches, there is a vast array of options available, which can rapidly send the price up significantly.

We can’t possibly list all of these options here, so you’ll have to check with Porsche. A couple examples: a bespoke personalized vehicle key + key pouch, for just $770, or a carbon fiber case for your owner’s manual, for $790.
These options added some ~$25k to each of our tested vehicles. The Turbo was $105,300 base, but $131,970 as tested. The 4 was $78,800 base, but $102,320 as tested. Both had plenty of options, but were missing plenty of them as well. Clicking on everything I could in Porsche’s configurator, I found at least $60k worth of options to be added.
So value is a hard thing to examine here, and will depend highly on your option mix and each customer’s personal desires and financial situation. Porsche knows that it’s catering to a different kind of customer, and can offer bespoke customizations because its customers aren’t just looking for any Porsche, but for my Porsche.
What I can say is that there are definitely other electric vehicles on the market that can do a lot of the things the Macan EV can do at a lower price. But you knew that already, and if you were looking for that, you wouldn’t be at the Porsche dealership in the first place.
Conclusion
Porsche is convinced that Porsche buyers want an experience that’s just like every other Porsche. And Porsche fans are relatively famous for their resistance to change – there are still Porsche grognards who are dismayed by Porsche’s move to water-cooled engines, or to electronic power steering.
But Porsche’s first EV, the Taycan, has had an impressive record of bringing drivers over who are “new to Porsche.” So Porsche has an opportunity here to speak to new customers, who might be more open to new experiences.
Macan, too, has brought many buyers to the Porsche brand who might not have otherwise considered a Porsche in the past. It’s a more practical vehicle than a 911, and it’s a more reasonable size than the larger Cayenne.
So the Macan EV is a chance for Porsche to do something different, and I think they’ve missed the mark a little. I don’t think that making a better EV experience – in the form of stronger regen, or a more silent drive experience, or a less fractured UI, or not telling me by default where all the gas stations are (I know it’s small, but seriously how are automakers still doing this on EVs in 2025) – makes for a worse Porsche experience. You can have the excellent drive control that Porsche is famous for – and that the Macan has – while still fully embracing the electric experience.

And note that this publication approaches our reviews from the perspective of all-in EV fans – so we expect a lot out of our EVs. It’s not enough to just replace the powertrain, we’re looking for a complete ownership experience that stands up to the best out there – the Rivians, the Teslas, the companies that are all-in on EVs and really doing them right.
So like many efforts from traditional manufacturers, I see this as a transitional vehicle. It’s obviously not a slapdash first-generation effort like the compliance cars of the 2010s, it’s much better than that. But it feels like there’s still a step between the Macan EV and EVs like the Tesla Model 3, or the Polestar 3, or the post-refresh Rivian R1. It just seems like there’s still a little hesitance from Porsche stopping it from going all-in.
But given the immediately popularity of the Macan EV, maybe we’re looking at it too much from an EV purist perspective. Maybe it is indeed the right transitional path for Porsche’s customers particularly its Macan customers. I just tend to think that it’s better to make a car that doesn’t just happen to be electric, but that’s better because it’s electric – and really goes all-in on leveraging the strengths of the EV.
All that said, everything about the car is customizable, which is a really great thing to see from a traditional manufacturer. If there’s anything you don’t like right out of the gate, you can probably change it to something you do like.
And we may see more of the refinements that I’m hoping for on the upcoming Cayenne or Boxster EV – or they may even come to the Macan over time through software updates, which Porsche has committed to offering for its vehicles. Some companies have had trouble with software – especially VW – but Porsche has done some impressive software things itself, so we have some confidence they’ll be able to provide a consistently improving experience… assuming the Germans let Silicon Valley take the lead on such things.

Overall, the Macan is comfortable, extremely powerful, has great driving dynamics and an incredible amount of customizability. But I can’t help but think that Porsche still has one foot in the non-electric world, and could benefit from diving straight in on EVs.
The Porsche Macan EV is available now. If you’re interested in a 2025 Porsche Macan EV, you can use our link to get in contact with a local dealer and register your interest.
Charge your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
You may like
Environment
Big Oil forced to confront some tough choices as ‘monster profits’ fade into memory
Published
4 hours agoon
October 13, 2025By
admin
Oil pumpjacks operate at Daqing Oilfield at sunset on November 18, 2024 in Daqing, Heilongjiang Province of China.
Vcg | Visual China Group | Getty Images
Energy supermajors are being forced to confront some tough choices in a weaker crude price environment, with generous shareholder payouts expected to come under serious pressure over the coming months.
U.S. and European oil majors, including Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell and BP, have moved to cut jobs and reduce costs of late, as they look to tighten their belts amid an industry downturn.
It reflects a stark change in mood from just a few years ago.
In 2022, the West’s five biggest oil companies raked in combined profits of nearly $200 billion when fossil fuel prices soared following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Flush with cash, the likes of Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and TotalEnergies sought to use what U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres described as their “monster profits” to reward shareholders with higher dividends and share buybacks.
Indeed, the amount of cash returns as a percentage of cash flow from operations (CFFO) has climbed to as much as 50% for several energy companies in recent quarters, according to Maurizio Carulli, global energy analyst at Quilter Cheviot.
It’s better to cut buybacks than dividends: For investors, buybacks are gravy, but dividends are the meat.
Clark Williams-Derry
Energy finance analyst at IEEFA
In today’s environment of weaker crude prices, however, Carulli said this policy risks taking on new levels of debt beyond what could be considered a “healthy” balance sheet.
BP and, more recently, TotalEnergies have announced plans to take steps to reduce shareholder returns.
Quilter Cheviot’s Carulli described this as a “sensible change in direction,” noting that other oil majors will likely follow suit.
Thomas Watters, managing director and sector lead for oil and gas at S&P Global Ratings, echoed this sentiment.
Oil refinery at sunrise: an aerial view of industrial power and energy production.
Chunyip Wong | E+ | Getty Images
“Oil companies are under pressure as crude prices soften, with the potential for prices to fall into the $50 range next year as OPEC continues to release surplus capacity and global inventories build,” Watters told CNBC by email.
“Faced with the challenge of sustaining these returns in a lower-price environment, many will look to reduce costs and capital spending where they can,” he added.
Dividend cuts ‘would send shivers through Wall Street’
Clark Williams-Derry, energy finance analyst at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), a non-profit organization, said trimming the share buybacks is likely Big Oil’s easiest option.
“Over the past few years, oil companies have used buybacks to return cash to investors and prop up share prices. And it’s better to cut buybacks than dividends: For investors, buybacks are gravy, but dividends are the meat,” Williams-Derry told CNBC by email.
“A cut in a dividend would send shivers through Wall Street,” Williams-Derry said.
Saudi Arabia’s state oil producer Saudi Aramco did just that earlier in the year, slashing the world’s biggest dividend amid an uncertain outlook for oil prices.
Brent crude futures year-to-date.
IEEFA’s Williams-Derry linked the move to a steady weakening of the Saudi Aramco’s share price through most of this year, noting that other private oil majors will want to avoid the same fate.
Ultimately, Williams-Derry said oil majors likely have three questions to consider now that the Ukraine boom in oil prices has faded.
“Do they keep taking on new debt to fund their shareholder payouts? Do they slash buybacks, eliminating one of the major factors propping up share prices? Or do they cut back on drilling, signaling weaker production in the future?” Williams-Derry said.
“There are risks to each choice, and no matter what they choose they’re bound to make some investors unhappy,” he added.
Big Oil outlook
For some, Big Oil’s current state of play is not nearly as bad as it might have been.
“It perhaps hasn’t been as gloomy as people expected earlier in the year, because you’ve had this narrative, really since the announcement of Trump’s tariffs back in April, that the oil market was meant to go into a glut and a period of oversupply later in the year,” Peter Low, co-head of energy research at Rothschild & Co Redburn, told CNBC by video call.
“What’s actually surprised people is how resilient oil prices have been because they have stayed in that $65 to $70 a barrel range, more or less,” he added.
Oil prices have since slipped below this range.
International benchmark Brent crude futures with December expiry traded 0.4% lower at $64.97 per barrel on Friday, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures with November expiry dipped 0.3% to trade at $61.24.
“The question, probably less for 3Q and perhaps more for 4Q, is really to what extent distributions and buybacks in particular might need to be to cut to reflect a weaker commodity price environment,” Low said.
“I think given that 3Q was OK, they will probably wait to see what happens in the coming weeks and months and 4Q would be a more natural point for them to revisit shareholder distributions,” he added.
TotalEnergies and Britain’s Shell are both scheduled to report third-quarter earnings on Oct. 30, with Exxon Mobil and Chevron set to follow suit on Oct. 31. BP is poised to report its quarterly results on Nov. 4.
Environment
Truckers are ready to embrace battery power TODAY – but it’s not what you think
Published
8 hours agoon
October 13, 2025By
admin
A new whitepaper by heavy truck makers PACCAR and Dragonfly Energy that incorporates real-world fleet trial data and Environmental Chamber Testing conducted at the PACCAR Technical Center seems to indicate that over-the-road truck drivers are ready to embrace battery power and reduce emissions – just not while they’re driving.
The whitepaper, titled Reducing Idle Time & Fuel Costs: Lithium Powered Solutions for Commercial Fleets, looked at different ways to reduce harmful diesel emissions across the duty cycles of a number of different fleet operations, and what they found was that powering a truck’s auxiliary and cabin systems with a high-voltage lithium-ion battery dramatically reduced engine idle time even under worst-case operating scenarios.
Another report by a group called the Clean Air Task Force showed that idling heavy-duty diesel engines while drivers are “hoteling” in their trucks (they’re parked, but running the engine to power the sleeper cab’s climate controls, kitchens, or electronics) exacts a heavy toll on both drivers and shipping fleets.
Idling not only burns fuel and increases operating costs at 0 MPG, it also emits a dangerous cocktail of harmul pollutants that pose direct health risks to drivers, rest stop employees, and nearby communities. Diesel exhaust contains fine particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), and numerous airborne toxins that are known carcinogens, making them a serious problem even to those who think climate change is a global conspiracy from “Big Science” to keep those plucky young oil billionaires in the place.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
From a mechanical standpoint, extended idling also accelerates engine wear, degrades emission-control systems, increases maintenance, and shortens engine life.
Battle Born semi batteries

By adding a relatively high capacity hybrid battery (like Dragonfly Energy’s Battle Born brand batteries) to the something like a PACCAR Kenworth T680 (at top), drivers can stay parked for several hours, operating their sleepers’ refrigerators, ACs, or heaters without the noise and emissions and costs of diesel – and they probably sleep better too, without the drone of neighboring diesels cranking on around them all night.
“We believe idle reduction remains one of the most immediate and cost-effective ways fleets can reduce fuel consumption and emissions while improving driver comfort. But just as important, the industry is increasingly focused on operational efficiency and maximizing asset utilization,” explains Wade Seaburg, chief commercial officer at Dragonfly Energy. “We believe our collaboration with PACCAR not only validates the performance of our LiFePO₄-powered solutions, but also highlights how they help fleets maximize uptime, extend equipment life and get more out of their assets.”
The electrification of the auxiliary systems also reduces engine hours, stretching out the time between scheduled maintenance and reducing operational downtime.
In other words, the hybridization of OTR trucks is a win-win-win. The full whitepaper is available for download at BattleBornBatteries.com/Lithium-Powered-Idle-Reduction. Take a look at it yourself, then let us know what you think of the idea in the comments.
SOURCE | IMAGES: PACCAR, Dragonfly Energy; via AP Newswire.

If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Renault says a desirable $20,000 EV is coming – and it’s NOT made in China
Published
9 hours agoon
October 13, 2025By
admin
French car brand Renault believes they’ve got the key to more affordable EV batteries, and their new LFP tech promises to slash the costs of production by 40%. The result? New, desirable EVs with a sub-20K price tag that aren’t made in China.
Spanish news site Motorpasión is reporting that Renault, like Ford, is embracing a more affordable lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery chemistries that are safer, cheaper, and less dependent on rare mineral mining than conventional li-ion batteries.
That’s a big change from the recent past. Because they’re less energy dense and weigh a bit more than comparably-sized lithium-ion NMC (nickel-manganese-cobalt) batteries, European automakers looked down on LFPs. But with Chinese automakers like BYD, MG, and Leapmotor flooding Europe with affordable LFP-powered EVs, that stigma is fading fast.
Fun, affordable LFP vehicles

The stability, battery life, and cost advantages of LFP have become too compelling to ignore — especially as global lithium and nickel prices continue to fluctuate, making long-term business projections difficult. Renault’s decision to embrace LFPs then, is less about catching up on the Chinese’ technology than it is about catching up catching up on the Chinese’ economics, and acknowledging that affordability is the real barrier to mass adoption.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
That was the thinking behind Renault’s relaunch of the R5 E-TECH (sold as the Le Car in the US) and the announcement that a new Twingo would be coming soon.
It was also the thinking behind the French carmaker’s decision to launch the new Ampere vehicle software development sub-brand back in 2023. At the time, the stated goals were to improve (what are now called) Renault’s software-defined vehicles and, separately, to reduce manufacturing costs of new EVs by 40% – which, if you’ll notice, is just about what the switch to LFP chemistries will enable them to do.
“Creating a new model of company specializing in electric vehicles and software running as of today: How better to illustrate our revolution and the boldness of our teams?” asked Luca de Meo, Renault Group CEO, at Ampere’s launch. He answered his own question, saying, “Instill a sustainable corporate vision and ensure it is reflected in each and every process and product. Build on the Group’s strengths and review the way we do everything. Form a tight-knit team and work for the collective. Harness our French roots and become the leader in Europe. Assert our commitment to our customers, our planet and those living on it.”
Renault is set to launch an all-new, all-electric version of its iconic Twingo minicar from the 1990s in the next few months (at top). The car is targeted straight at the BYD Dolphin and is expected to have a starting price of about €17,000 (just under $20,000 US).
SOURCE: Motorpasión; images via Renault.

If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year ago
Here are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024