Connect with us

Published

on

The amount of sewage being dumped into English rivers remains “disgraceful”, despite improved monitoring, supposed investment by water companies and threats of penalties from government, the latest data reveals.

Overall, there was a 2.9% decrease in the number of sewage spills last year compared to 2023, according to water company data collected and analysed by the Environment Agency.

Despite this small improvement in the number of events, the duration of spills – the amount of time a water treatment plant discharges untreated sewage into a river or the sea – increased by 0.2%.

“This year’s data shows we are still a long way off where we need to be to stop unnecessary sewage pollution,” said Alan Lovell, chair of the Environment Agency.

The EA says it has secured £10.2bn from water companies to reduce sewage dumping.

“While these improvements get under way, we expect water companies to do what customers pay it to do: ensure their existing assets are maintained and operating properly,” said Mr Lovell.

‘Stark reminder’

More on Environment

The latest data is bad, if not unexpected news, for the government.

“These figures are disgraceful and are a stark reminder of how years of underinvestment have led to water companies discharging unacceptable levels of sewage into our rivers, lakes and seas,” said Environment Secretary Steve Reed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Redgrave calls for river clean up

The government says part of its £100bn public infrastructure investment plans will address water pollution.

But repairing or replacing thousands of miles of ageing water pipes and dilapidated water treatment works, as well as building new ones, is expected to take decades.

This year, it also introduced the Water (Special Measures) Act which it said it would use to get “tough” on water companies.

The bill allows for the banning of bonuses for water company bosses failing to meet targets and allows criminal charges to be brought against companies in breach of the law.

The government, however, may soon find itself in the stink.

Read more from Sky News:
BAFTA TV Awards nominations revealed
Pair held in probe into vandalism at Trump golf resort

Last week, environment watchdog the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) announced it was launching an investigation into whether proposed plans from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) to clean up waterways are in breach of the law.

The OEP is to decide whether DEFRA’s plans, implemented by the Environment Agency and the water regulator Ofwat, are too generic and fail to address the environmental risk of sewage pollution at particular sites.

England, for example, is home to the majority of the world’s chalk stream rivers and streams that are particularly sensitive to sewage pollution.

‘Still broken’

For clean water campaigners, the latest data is just more of the same.

“The water industry is still broken,” said James Wallace, chief executive of River Action.

He added: “The numbers are staggering: over 3.6 million hours of sewage spills from almost 450,000 discharges.

“That’s equivalent to 412 continuous years of sewage polluting our rivers, lakes and seas.”

The frustration for consumers is that many of us will see significant increases to our bills in order to finance the investments being demanded by Ofwat and the government to meet pollution targets.

Last year, an independent Water Commission was launched by the government.

Led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, it is charged with coming up with long-term reforms for the way water companies are regulated.

The commission should look at the structure and ownership of water companies themselves, according to campaigners.

“[It] must put an end to this failed privatisation experiment and force real reform of the industry and regulators,” said Mr Wallace.

“We need to learn from our European neighbours, and use finance and governance models that put people and nature before investors.”

Continue Reading

UK

Government looking at other countries to process asylum seekers in, home secretary says

Published

on

By

Government looking at other countries to process asylum seekers in, home secretary says

The government is looking at other countries it could process asylum seekers in, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has told Sky News.

Speaking to Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, Ms Cooper said the government has been talking to Italy about its arrangements with Albania and with the EU Commission about other options.

Ms Cooper said she has been speaking to the Italian interior minister about their deal, which means asylum seekers wanting to settle in Italy will be processed in Albania.

Politics latest: Nobody had courage to speak up when Prince Harry was in room

A group thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover after a small boat incident in the Channel on 27 March. Pic: PA
Image:
A group thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover after a small boat incident in the Channel on 27 March. Pic: PA

Asked if she wants the same deal for the UK, following reports the government is looking at a deal with Albania, Ms Cooper said: “We will always look at what works.

“There has to be practical things that will work, not gimmicks.”

She criticised the Conservative government’s Rwanda deal, which was meant to see UK asylum seekers processed in Rwanda. It cost £700m but only saw four volunteers sent there.

More on Migrant Crossings

Former Labour home secretary Lord Blunkett has suggested the government should create bespoke agreements with designated “safe” countries to deport foreign criminals and illegal immigrants, as this would override any claims through the Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Inside two of Italy's controversial migrant centres in Albania
Image:
Italy has opened migrant centres in Albania

Asked about that, and whether the UK is talking to Albania or any other countries about an “Italian-style deal”, Ms Cooper said: “We’ve talked to the Italian government about the arrangements that they have, and we’ve always said we’ll look at what works.

“We’re also talking to the EU Commission who are interested in different approaches around return hubs, that’s the kind of thing that you’re talking about.

“But our central focus is on the borders, the summit, the organised immigration crime summit and on tackling the criminal gangs.”

Read more:
Gig company bosses who fail to check employees’ immigration status could face jail
Italian court deals Albania migrant scheme another blow

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour ‘deports 19,000 migrants’

The UK is hosting an “unprecedented” border security summit on Monday with interior ministers and law enforcement from more than 40 countries, Ms Cooper said.

She said the summit was necessary because illegal immigration is a “global problem”.

“The criminal gang networks that end up with people arriving in the UK, stretch back through northern France, through Germany, across Europe, to places like the hills of Kurdistan or the money markets in Kabul,” the home secretary said.

“So you need to tackle this as a global problem.”

Ms Cooper added that the government has got new agreements with France and the French government has changed the rules so its police force will now “take action” in the Channel to prevent migrants crossing to the UK in small boats.

STARMER MELONI
Image:
Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni with Sir Keir Starmer in Downing Street in March

Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to “smash the gangs”, which Ms Cooper said can be seen through the 20% increase in migrant returns since Labour was voted in last summer, a 40% increase in illegal working raids and a 40% increase in arrests for illegal working.

The Home Office announced on Sunday that company bosses hiring in the gig economy could face up to five years in prison if they fail to check if their employees can legally work in the UK.

Ms Cooper told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: “Frankly, it is too easy at the moment for employers to take people on illegally through those contract mechanisms without those checks in place.”

Continue Reading

UK

Charity boss says Prince Harry asked for public message of support for Meghan after polo fundraiser ‘went badly’

Published

on

By

Charity boss says Prince Harry asked for public message of support for Meghan after polo fundraiser 'went badly'

The chair of a charity set up by Prince Harry says he asked for a public message of support for Meghan after a polo fundraiser “went badly”.

In a wide-ranging interview with Sky News’ Trevor Phillips, chair of Sentebale Dr Sophie Chandauka also claimed:

• The charity lost sponsors and donors when the Sussexes left the UK – but she wasn’t allowed to discuss the problem
• Harry is the “number one risk” to the charity
• He tried to “eject” her from the organisation
• He would appoint board members without consulting her

Sentebale was set up by the prince in 2006 in memory of his mother, Princess Diana, to help young people with HIV in Lesotho and Botswana.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Full interview with Sophie Chandauka

Dr Chandauka has already accused the prince of “harassment and bullying at scaleby “unleashing” the Sussex PR machine – an allegation a source denied as “completely baseless”.

On Tuesday, Prince Harry quit as patron of the charity along with several other senior members after disagreements with the chair.

Polo fundraiser ‘went badly’

More on Meghan Markle

In a full interview with Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Dr Chandauka discussed Prince Harry’s filming of a Netflix show, which she said resulted in the charity losing the venue for an event they were holding.

She said the duke phoned her team, saying he’d like to bring a Netflix crew to the polo event.

She said the venue owners were originally “happy for us to use their polo grounds at a material discount”.

But as a result of the request, the price increased as it had become a commercial venture.

The charity was forced to pull out of the venue as it couldn’t afford the fee, according to Dr Chandauka, but then was “lucky enough” to find another through Prince Harry’s connections.

On the day, however, she claimed there were more problems.

“The duchess decided to attend, but she told us she wasn’t attending, and she brought a friend, a very famous friend,” Dr Chandauka said.

“The choreography went badly on stage because we had too many people on stage.

The Duchess of Sussex presented a trophy to Prince Harry after his team won a polo event in Wellington, Florida, in April 2024. Pic: PA
Image:
The Duchess of Sussex presented a trophy to Prince Harry after his team won a polo event in Wellington, Florida, in April 2024. Pic: PA

“The international press captured this, and there was a lot of talk about the duchess and the choreography on stage and whether she should have been there and her treatment of me.”

She claimed the media attention around Meghan’s treatment of her prompted Prince Harry to ask Dr Chandauka to issue a statement in support of the duchess.

“I said I wouldn’t. Not because I didn’t care about the duchess, but because I knew what would happen if I did so, number one. And number two, because we cannot be an extension of the Sussexes,” she said.

A source close to the former trustees of the Sentebale charity described Dr Chandauka’s account of the polo match as “highly misleading”. Sky News also contacted Netflix, who declined to comment.

‘Number one risk’

Dr Chandauka was asked if the Duke of Sussex is the “number one risk” to the charity, and replied “yes”.

She added that when she asked why there was a loss of sponsors at the time the Sussexes left the UK, she was told: “It’s an uncomfortable conversation to have with Prince Harry in the room.”

“What you discovered was essentially, donors were walking because of the prince’s reputation?” asked Trevor Phillips.

“Yes,” Dr Chandauka replied.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Prince Harry ‘unleashed Sussex machine’

She also accused the prince of trying to “eject” her from the organisation.

“There were board meetings where members of the executive team and external strategic advisors were sending me messages saying, ‘Should I interrupt?’, ‘Should I stop this?’ ‘Oh my gosh, this is so bad’,” she said.

“In fact, our strategic adviser for fundraising then sent me a message saying she wouldn’t want to ever attend any more board meetings or bring her colleagues because of the treatment.”

When she didn’t leave, Dr Chandauka suggested Prince Harry tried to force the failure of the charity he set up in his mother’s memory.

“Prince Harry started to brief, and his team, sponsors that I had been speaking to, against me and the charity, because that is a sure way of getting me out if it’s seen as though I’m not being successful in my fundraising efforts,” she said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘This all came as a shock to me’

When asked about a Sky News interview with former trustee Dr Kelello Lerotholi who said he was “surprised” by her accusations about the prince, Dr Chandauka said she wasn’t “surprised that he didn’t know much of what was going on in the organisation”.

“He had the worst attendance record and even when he was in the meetings, he didn’t actually contribute that much,” she said.

‘Everybody’s shocked and quiet’

Dr Chandauka gave an example of the prince’s behaviour in board meetings.

“Prince Harry decides, on this specific occasion, that he wants to appoint an individual to the board, with immediate effect, without having talked to me,” she said.

“His proxy on the board says, ‘Yes, I second that motion’. The third proxy on the board says, ‘Welcome to the board, Brian’.

“And everybody’s shocked and quiet, but this is what happens when the prince is in the room and no one has the courage to speak.”

Sky News contacted the Duke and Duchess of Sussex about the contents of Sophie Chandauka’s interview with Trevor Phillips, and they declined to offer any formal response.

But the source close to the former trustees of the Sentebale charity has described as categorically false Dr Chandauka’s claims that Dr Lerotholi did not attend meetings and did not contribute much when he was in meetings and that the Duke of Sussex leaving the UK impacted the charity, caused it to lose sponsors, or that the duke posed the biggest risk to the charity.

The source also described as “completely baseless” Dr Chandauka’s claims that she was bullied and harassed, briefed against by Prince Harry, or that the Sussex machine was unleashed on her and that the people on the board of Sentebale were scared to speak up when the duke was in the room.

The claim that the press was informed about the royal patrons departure as trustees before the charity, has been described by the source as “categorically untrue”.

In response to Dr Chandauka’s claim that the Duke of Sussex was ‘forcing the failure’ of the charity ‘as a last resort’, the source pointed to the public statement of Prince Harry and his co-founder of the Sentebale charity, Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, which read:

“It is devastating that the relationship between the charity’s trustees and the chair of the board broke down beyond repair, creating an untenable situation.

“These trustees acted in the best interest of the charity in asking the chair to step down, while keeping the wellbeing of staff in mind. In turn, she sued the charity to remain in this voluntary position, further underscoring the broken relationship.”

Continue Reading

UK

Morning-after pill set to be made free from pharmacies in bid to end ‘unfair postcode lottery’

Published

on

By

Morning-after pill set to be made free from pharmacies in bid to end 'unfair postcode lottery'

The morning-after pill could become free from pharmacies in order to end an “unfair postcode lottery”, according to a health minister. 

The morning-after pill is a type of emergency contraception taken to prevent an unwanted pregnancy.

Despite its name, it can be taken up to five days after unprotected sex, but the sooner it is taken, the more effective it is.

Emergency contraception is free from most GPs and sexual health clinics, but pharmacies can charge up to £30.

Health minister Stephen Kinnock said women “face an unfair postcode lottery when seeking emergency contraception, with access varying dramatically depending on where they live”.

He described equal access to safe contraception as “a cornerstone of a fair society”.

The proposal, which will be announced on Monday as part of a wider investment in community pharmacies, would come into effect later this year.

More on Health

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why does PM want to scrap NHS England?

As well as making access to the pill more equal, it is hoped the plans will free up appointments for GPs as women will no longer have to book in to receive the medicine.

The government is making a raft of changes to the healthcare system, including scrapping NHS England, the administrative body that runs the national health service.

Continue Reading

Trending