Connect with us

Published

on

Harrods has revised the terms of a compensation scheme to be offered to hundreds of sexual abuse victims of the department store’s former owner, Mohamed al Fayed, ahead of its formal launch this week.

Sky News has learnt that lawyers for Harrods have increased the maximum potential payout for survivors of Mr al Fayed from roughly £330,000 to a sum closer to £400,000, following consultation with claimants’ legal representatives.

Sources said final proposals for the compensation scheme would be published on Monday – although some victims may still face a lengthy wait to receive their payouts.

Harrods, which is owned by a Qatari sovereign wealth fund controlled by the Gulf state’s ruling family, said last year that it was “utterly appalled” by the disclosure that Mr al Fayed had sexually abused numerous female employees during his 25-year ownership of the Knightsbridge store.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘It was horrific’

People close to the talks about the compensation scheme said the final proposals included general damages lump sums of up to £110,000 or £200,000 – with the higher figure available to claimants willing to submit to psychiatric assessments arranged by the company.

These figures are unchanged from draft proposals which were subject to consultation in recent weeks, although other elements of the proposed compensation payments have been revised upwards, with the effect of increasing the potential maximum sums that could be paid out, the people added.

The redress scheme is being coordinated by MPL Legal, an Essex-based law firm.

More on Mohamed Al Fayed

Last weekend, Sky News reported the contents of a document produced by MPL Legal which said that victims of Mr al Fayed who chose a “non-medical pathway” – which would not require any form of medical assessment – would be eligible for “general damages limited to compensation for sexual assault of up to £110,000”, with “aggravated damages [of] up to £15,000”, and “wrongful testing fixed payment(s) up to £7,500”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Al Fayed’s language was very sexualised’

Claimants who agreed to an assessment by a scheme consultant psychiatrist – referred to in the document as the “medical pathway” – would be eligible for general damages of up to £200,000, further payments equivalent to those potentially awarded to non-medical claimants, as well as treatment costs “past and future supported by the medical report” and a “work impact payment capped at £110,000”.

The “wrongful testing” payments refer to women who were forced to undergo unnecessary and intrusive medical examinations demanded by Mr al Fayed, while the “work impact payments” relate to loss of earnings triggered by, for example, the unjustified termination of victims’ employment at Harrods.

One source said the revised maximum compensation sum to be disclosed on Monday was now expected to be between £350,000 and £400,000.

The requirement to undergo a psychiatric assessment by a medical practitioner selected by Harrods in order to access the largest payouts risks angering claimants who have endured years of psychological trauma after being abused by Mr al Fayed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Many more’ likely abused by Fayed

A person close to the store said this was a necessary legal step.

External law firms which have been organising separate cases against Harrods are likely to argue that the terms being published on Monday are not sufficiently generous, and impose too many legal restrictions and disclosure obligations on victims of the store’s former owner.

Depending upon how many women submit compensation claims either through the MPL Legal scheme or via another law firm, Harrods’ compensation bill is ultimately expected to run to tens of millions of pounds.

A Harrods spokesperson reissued a statement previously given to Sky News, saying: “It would be premature for us to comment on the nature and details of a scheme that is currently under consultation.

“We are actively inviting the valuable input from Survivors and their legal representatives to establish the final scheme that aims to be survivor-first, trauma-informed, and fair in its approach to compensation.

“Further updates will be provided once the consultation period is complete.”

According to a website set up by MPL Legal for the purposes of administering the scheme, “Harrods and MPL Legal are undertaking a period of consultation regarding the compensation scheme in which we will receive detailed feedback from interested parties, including several legal firms representing survivors, leading Counsel and Dame Jasvinder [Sanghera], the Independent Survivor Advocate”.

“It is anticipated the final compensation scheme will be published and survivors will be able to access application forms from 31 March 2025.”

Mr al Fayed, who died in 2023, owned Harrods for a quarter of a century, selling it in 2010 to Qatar Holding for £1.5bn.

His reign of terror at the Knightsbridge store is thought to have involved hundreds of predominantly young female victims, with former Fulham women’s players also alleging sexual abuse by the billionaire Egyptian.

Mr al Fayed also owned Fulham Football Club, as well as the Ritz Hotel in Paris, for a number of years.

The MPL Legal document previously reported by Sky News said the redress scheme would “provide options for survivors – an alternative route to the court process”, and that it would “hopefully avoid an adversarial approach which also risks retraumatising survivors”.

It added that the scheme would be “as inclusive as possible – we want the scheme to work for as many survivors as we can”.

Under the heading “Scheme principles”, MPL said it represented “an alternative to litigation, but a survivor can leave the scheme at any time and pursue the claim through the court system”.

It said it hoped that law firms engaging with the scheme “will ensure survivors receive 100% of the compensation”.

“The level of compensation available through the scheme has been designed to mirror the court’s approach,” it added.

Last October, lawyers acting for victims of Mr al Fayed said they had received more than 420 enquiries about potential claims, although it is unclear how many more have come forward in the six months since.

Continue Reading

UK

Cole Cooper death: Grieving mum alleges ‘third party’ involved

Published

on

By

Cole Cooper death: Grieving mum alleges 'third party' involved

The grieving mother of a Scottish teenager who vanished for almost five weeks has told Sky News she believes a “third party” was involved in her son’s death – but police say there’s “no evidence” of that.

Cole Cooper, 19, was discovered dead in woods near Falkirk earlier this month following a missing persons inquiry his relatives don’t believe was taken seriously enough by police.

He was last seen on CCTV in May after leaving a house party, but police later revealed a former school friend had spoken to Cole a few days later nearby.

Speaking exclusively to Sky News, his mother Wendy Stewart, 42, revealed her son had “various arguments” in the days and hours before he disappeared.

Wendy&Aimee
Image:
Cole’s mum Wendy (L) and his aunt Aimee

In an emotional interview, she said: “He was only 19, he should never have been taken. I am never going to see him again. I never got a chance to give him a last cuddle and hold his hand.

“Someone has taken that away from me far too soon. Whether it be intentionally or unintentionally, I do believe there has been some involvement by a third party and the result is the death of Cole.”

More on Scotland

The family, who organised a local vigil in Cole’s memory last weekend, have vowed to get “justice”.

Asked what that means, Ms Stewart told Sky News: “Finding the culprit and getting justice that way. Finding the person that is responsible for the death of my child.”

Police previously said 400 residents were spoken to during door-to-door enquiries and more than 2,000 hours of CCTV footage was collected.

The 19-year-old’s death is being treated as “unexplained”, with a top police officer saying “at this time there is no evidence of any third party involvement”.

Read more from Sky News:
Council apologises amid school Union Flag row
Winter fuel payment in Scotland ‘will not be less than UK benefit’

Cole Cooper's mother Wendy Stewart, comforts her son Coby, 10 and daughter Casia, 11, during a vigil at the Glenskirlie Hotel in Banknock, f
Image:
A vigil was held in Banknock for Cole Cooper. Pic: PA

Cole’s aunt Aimee Tennie, 32, revealed the family’s anger over the police handling of the case as they attempt to find out what happened.

She said: “We are aware of small details surrounding the weekend leading up to it with arguments. He had a few arguments over that weekend. We want the details re-examined thoroughly.”

Sky News put all of the family’s concerns and allegations to Police Scotland.

The force initially swerved our questions and responded saying: “Enquiries remain ongoing.”

In an update later on Wednesday morning, Detective Chief Inspector Bob Williamson said: “We are carrying out significant enquiries into Cole’s death, however, at this time there is no evidence of any third party involvement.

“It is vital that we establish the full circumstances leading up to Cole’s death so that we can provide some answers to his family.

“The thoughts of everyone involved in this investigation are very much with his family and friends and officers will continue to offer them support and keep them informed as our enquiries progress.”

Ms Stewart claimed the probe has been handled “shockingly” with a failure to take her son’s disappearance seriously.

The 42-year-old said: “I have had to scream and shout from rooftops to be heard by the police. I don’t think they have handled it well.

“The police really need to take accountability and listen to families, they are reporting a missing child and understand the family knows their child best.”

Cole’s loved ones still have not been told when his body will be released to allow them to lay him to rest.

Continue Reading

UK

Sisters drowned in pools in Eryri (Snowdonia) National Park, inquest told

Published

on

By

Sisters drowned in pools in Eryri (Snowdonia) National Park, inquest told

Two sisters drowned in pools in Wales’s largest national park, an inquest has heard.

Hajra Zahid, 29, and Haleema Zahid, 25, were pulled from pools on the Watkin Path – one of the six main routes to the summit of Yr Wyddfa, or Snowdon, in North Wales on 11 June.

North Wales Police said officers were called to the scene in Eryri National Park, also known as Snowdonia, at 9.31pm after they received a report that a woman had been pulled from the water, and another was said to be in the pools.

Both sisters, who were born in Pakistan but lived in Maltsby, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, were pronounced dead at the scene before 11pm.

Inquests into their deaths were opened at the Dafydd Orwig Chamber in Caernarfon on Wednesday, and assistant coroner for north-west Wales, Sarah Riley, said they “sadly both died as a result of drowning”.

“Investigations continue in terms of how they came by their death and the inquest is therefore adjourned to allow for completion of those investigations,” she added, as she offered her condolences to the sisters’ family and friends.

The coroner said the siblings “had travelled to the Nant Gwynant area with friends from university”, with a friend later identifying the University of Chester students.

Read more from Sky News:
Police admit failures in Harry Dunn case
BBLs ‘administered in public toilets’

Vice-chancellor of the University of Chester, Professor Eunice Simmons, said: “The University of Chester community is in mourning for the tragic loss of Haleema Zahid and Hajra Zahid and our heartfelt sympathies are with their families and friends during this incredibly difficult time.

“Haleema and Hajra had joined Chester Business School earlier this year on the Master’s in International Business course.

“They touched the lives of many here at Chester – their friends, the cohort on their course and the staff who taught them – and they will be deeply missed.”

Continue Reading

UK

Kneecap rapper appears in court on terror charge – as protesters gather outside

Published

on

By

Kneecap rapper appears in court on terror charge - as protesters gather outside

A member of Irish-language rap group Kneecap has appeared in court in London after being charged with a terror offence – as hundreds of protesters gathered outside.

Liam O’Hanna, or Liam Og O hAnnaidh, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah, a proscribed organisation in the UK, at a gig last year.

The charge against the 27-year-old, from Belfast, was brought last month after counter-terror officers assessed a video reported to be from a Kneecap concert at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, London, on 21 November 2024.

O hAnnaidh arrived at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday with bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh, as a crowd of fans and supporters gathered with placards and flags outside.

Kneecap's Liam O'Hanna walks into court.
Pic PA
Image:
O’Hanna (centre) arrived at court with his bandmates, including Naoise O Caireallain (below). Pics: PA

Kneecap's Moglai Bap (Naoise O Caireallain).
Pic PA

During a short appearance, O hAnnaidh confirmed his name and address, and was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing on 20 August.

Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring told him he must attend court on that day.

Kneecap released their first single in 2017 and rose to wider prominence in 2024 following the release of their debut album and award-winning eponymous film – a fictionalised retelling of how the band came together and their fight to save the Irish language.

The group are known for their provocative lyrics and merchandise – and have been vocally opposed to Israel’s military action in Gaza.

O hAnnaidh performs under the stage name Mo Chara, while O Caireallain is known as Moglai Bap, and O Dochartaigh as DJ Provai.

Kneecap's Liam Og O Hannaidh leaves Westminster Magistrates' Court in London, through a crowd of supporters after he appeared charged with a terrorism offence. The 27-year-old from Belfast, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara and is also known as Liam O'Hanna, has been charged with a terrorism offence relating to displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town on November 21. Picture date: Wednesday June 18, 2025. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Jordan Pettitt/PA Wire
Image:
Pic: PA

They have built a following for their hedonistic anti-establishment tracks, but their outspoken stance has proved polarising – prompting a surge in streaming for their songs and, at the same time, resulting in several of their gigs being cancelled this year.

Last year, they won a discrimination case against the UK government after Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch tried to refuse them a £14,250 funding award when she was business secretary.

Continue Reading

Trending