Connect with us

Published

on

Donald Trump has said he was “very angry” and “pissed off” after Vladimir Putin criticised the credibility of Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in a phone call with Sky News’ US partner network, NBC News.

Mr Trump said the Russian president’s recent comments, calling for a transitional government to be put in place in Ukraine in a move that could effectively push out Mr Zelenskyy, were “not going in the right direction”.

It is a rare move by Mr Trump to criticise Mr Putin, who he has generally spoken positively about during discussions to end the war in Ukraine.

Last month, he also released a barrage of critical comments about Mr Zelenskyy’s leadership, falsely claiming that he had “poor approval” ratings in Ukraine.

The US leader added that if Russia is unable to make a deal on “stopping bloodshed in Ukraine” then he would put secondary tariffs on “all oil coming out of Russia”.

“That would be that if you buy oil from Russia, you can’t do business in the United States. There will be a 25% tariff on all oil, a 25 to 50-point tariff on all oil,” he said.

Mr Trump said Mr Putin knows he is angry, but added that he has “a very good relationship with him” and “the anger dissipates quickly… if he does the right thing”.

He said he plans to speak with the Russian president again this week.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

The comments directed towards Mr Putin come after a separate phone call on Saturday, in which Mr Trump threatened Iran with bombings and secondary tariffs, if Tehran did not make a deal with the US to ensure it did not develop a nuclear weapon.

“If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing,” Mr Trump told NBC. “But there’s a chance that if they don’t make a deal, that I will do secondary tariffs on them like I did four years ago.”

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Sunday that Iran had rejected direct negotiations with the US, but left open the possibility of indirect negotiations with Washington.

No one will be fired over Signal group chat blunder

Also addressing the national security blunder, which saw a journalist mistakenly added to a Signal chat group discussing planned strikes on Yemen, Mr Trump confirmed no one will be fired.

It was revealed this week that national security adviser Michael Waltz accidentally added The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a group chat with senior members of the Trump administration who were discussing plans to strike Houthi militants earlier this month.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Marjorie Taylor Greene lashing out at Sky’s Martha Kelner

The White House sought to downplay the incident, with Mr Trump repeatedly branding it “fake news” throughout an interview with Sky’s network partner NBC News.

The president said on Saturday: “I don’t fire people because of fake news and because of witch hunts.”

Mr Trump said he still had confidence in Mr Waltz and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was also in the Signal chat and sent a detailed timeline of the planned strikes before they happened.

The president added: “I think it’s just a witch hunt and the fake news, like you, talk about it all the time, but it’s just a witch hunt, and it shouldn’t be talked [about].

“We had a tremendously successful strike. We struck very hard and very lethal. And nobody wants to talk about that. All they want to talk about is nonsense. It’s fake news.”

Read more from Sky News:
Make America a Commonwealth member? Trump would see himself equal to the King

JD Vance felt the cold in Greenland – and it wasn’t just the weather

Mr Trump’s comments come amid calls – including from his allies – to fire Mr Waltz after Mr Goldberg wrote on Monday that he had been added to a chat group on a private messaging app.

The Trump administration has since repeatedly claimed the Yemen plans were not classified.

Continue Reading

US

Trump trade war: Why a figure of 48% is important as escalation nears

Published

on

By

Trump trade war: Why a figure of 48% is important as escalation nears

Here is a number to lodge in your brain in the coming weeks and months: 48%.

Last year a group of economists carried out an an analysis on the economic impact of the Iron Curtain; how much trade actually took place from east to west in spite of all the restrictions during the Cold War. They came to the conclusion that, at its height in 1951, “the Iron Curtain represented a tariff equivalent of 48%”.

As the world limbers up ahead of what Donald Trump calls his “liberation day”, that figure is worth keeping in your mind.

Right now, the average dutiable rate of tariffs on China is somewhere between 30% and 40%. But in the event that the president imposes another 20% of tariffs on China, the level of tariffs between these two trade partners will rival or possibly exceed those Iron Curtain levels.

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on Thursday.
Pic: AP
Image:
President Donald Trump speaks at the White House.
Pic: AP

No-one is sure what will happen next. What number will the President choose for his next round of tariffs? 10%? 20%? Or the 25% rate he has favoured for steel, aluminium and cars? Will the next round of tariffs announced this week be imposed on every country? Will they just be imposed on the so-called “dirty fifteen” the Treasury Secretary has talked about? Who, for that matter, are the “dirty fifteen”?

We don’t know the answers to these questions. Nor do other world leaders like Keir Starmer. Nor, for that matter, do many in the White House, it seems.

But, back to that number at the top. The tariffs being talked about by the president and his colleagues are now approaching serious levels. Once you start facing cumulative tariffs approaching 50% then, as we saw during the Cold War, many countries stop trading altogether.

More on Donald Trump

And with those kinds of charges looming it’s no surprise many businesses and traders are taking radical steps to try to prepare for the coming months of chaos. Consider two examples.

 Gold

The first is to be found if you look at the exports (transfers is probably a better word in this case) of gold from the UK to the US. Up until a few months ago these flows averaged about £22m a month. Then, as traders fretted about the imposition of tariffs and controls on everything (including gold), there was a totally unprecedented exodus of gold bars from the UK to the US – £1.2bn in December and £6.1bn in January. These numbers, it goes without saying, are totally unprecedented. We’ve never seen outflows like this before.

Deficit

The other data point (somewhat related) is to be found by looking at the US balance of payments. Remember the whole point of these tariffs is to try to eliminate (or at least reduce) America’s trade deficit with the rest of the world. President Trump wants the country to produce more goods and import less.

Read more:
What do Trump’s tariffs mean for the UK?
Tariffs: The rewards and risks for US as trade war intensifies

But in the past year, the US trade deficit has literally doubled. Up from £67bn in January last year to £131bn this January. Again, this is unprecedented. It’s a hallmark of the fact that importers were scrambling to bring as much stuff into the country as possible (not just gold, but machinery, metals, cars, electronics – everything) before tariffs got imposed.

The great irony, then, is that the first impact of the Trump tariffs has been to send the trade deficit in the opposite direction from the one the President is aiming for. It will, of course, lurch back the other way in the coming months. But where it ends is anyone’s guess. In the meantime, more chaos and instability awaits. Hold onto your hats.

Continue Reading

US

‘You can start with me’: Commander of NASA flight that was stranded in space for more than nine months says he is partly to blame

Published

on

By

'You can start with me': Commander of NASA flight that was stranded in space for more than nine months says he is partly to blame

One of the astronauts who was stranded on the International Space Station (ISS) has said some of the blame for what went wrong lies with him.

Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams splashed down off the coast of Florida earlier this month after more than nine months onboard the ISS.

The two astronauts docked at the ISS on 5 June last year, expecting to be there for just eight days.

Instead, issues with Boeing’s long-awaited Starliner meant NASA decided to leave them waiting in orbit for months.

Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore. Pics: NASA
Image:
Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore. Pics: NASA

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Splashdown! Butch and Suni’s space saga is over

Wilmore: ‘Start with me’ for blame

Mr Wilmore was asked at a NASA news conference on Monday evening where he lays the blame for the issues with Starliner, to which he said, “I’ll start with me”.

“There were issues, of course, with what happened with Starliner,” he added. “There were some issues, of course, that happened that prevented us from returning on Starliner.

More on Nasa

“And I’ll start with me because there were questions that, as the commander of the spacecraft that I should have asked. And I did not, I didn’t know I needed to…

“Blame, that’s a term – I don’t like that term – certainly there’s responsibility throughout all the programmes, and certainly you can start with me.”

He then added that responsibility for the issues with returning home can be found “all throughout the chain”, including with NASA and Boeing.

NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams. Pic: NASA Johnson
Image:
Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams. Pic: NASA Johnson

Williams: ‘Life goes on up there’

Ms Williams also said she was somewhat surprised by the interest in their prolonged space mission.

“Life goes on up there. I mentioned today that we pivoted and became [ISS] crew members,” she said. “You maybe sort of get tunnel visioned into doing your job.

“We were just really focused on what we were doing… ‘the world doesn’t revolve around us but we revolve around it’.”

Ms Williams then said: “I don’t think we were aware to the degree [people were interested], pretty honoured and humbled by the fact of when we came home, it was like ‘wow there are a lot of people’.”

During their long wait in space, the two US navy veterans completed spacewalks, experiments and even helped sort out the plumbing onboard the ISS.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Stuck astronaut takes first spacewalk

Sky’s science and technology editor Tom Clarke asked the astronauts if the politics around their stay in the ISS made a difficult situation worse. Nick Hague – who also was onboard the Crew-9 flight – disagreed.

After explaining the timeline from the launch of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 to the return of the two astronauts, he said: “That was never in question the entire time.

“The politics don’t make it up there when we’re making operational decisions. There were a lot of options that were discussed, and the team on the ground… is gigantic, and everyone was working with a singular focus.”

Read more:
Stranded astronauts have just returned to a very different world

Pic: NASA
Image:
Nick Hague (left) said political changes in the US did not effect the mission. Pic: NASA

Astronauts more guarded answers show NASA giving politics a wide berth


Photo of Tom Clarke

Tom Clarke

Science and technology editor

@t0mclark3

The life of an astronaut is all about preparation.

And as Butch and Suni faced questions for the first back on Earth time about how their “stranding” in space was treated like an orbital political football – that really shone through.

The astronauts looked healthy and relaxed, despite having spent 35 times longer in space than they had expected to.

They were happy to answer questions about their safe return, the effects of their extended stay in space on their bodies.

But when it came to politics, the answers were much more guarded.

When I asked them about whether politics had made their difficult situation worse, it was quickly picked up, not by the pair themselves, but by astronaut Nick Hague, their mission commander for the ride back to Earth.

“The politics don’t make it up there when we’re making operational decisions,” he said.

“There were a lot of options discussed by the ground team, and everyone worked with singular focus on how do we end the Crew 9 mission at the right time and maintain the safety and the success of the space station mission.”

Their reluctance to address the political questions around the mission is understandable.

They have returned to a NASA bracing itself, like many federally funded organisations, for possible budget cuts and the mercurial decision-making of Donald Trump and his close ally Elon Musk.

Both men had suggested it was a political decision by the previous administration not to return them to Earth sooner.

Painting their already scheduled return as a “rescue mission” – despite presenting no evidence of the claim it put NASA in an embarrassing position.

It has been maintained all along that the plan was for the pair to return to Earth with the next rotation of the space station crew. Which is what subsequently happened.

But in the current political climate, and still awaiting the confirmation of a new leader for NASA’s administration, it’s giving politics a wide berth.

The crew were also asked about how weird it was to return to Earth in the SpaceX capsule – and about the welcome party of dolphins that swam around the vessel after splashdown.

“I can tell you that returning from space to Earth through the atmosphere inside of a 3000-degree fireball of plasma is weird, regardless of how you look at it,” Mr Wilmore said.

“It’s thrilling, it’s amazing, I remember thinking about the structure of the capsule,” as the Dragon Freedom capsule descended at pace toward our planet.

“And then the parachutes open and… it’s exhilarating.”

Mr Hague then remarked, “I had requested dolphins as kind of a joke”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Dolphins greet returning astronauts

Continue Reading

US

Finnish president reveals Trump running out of patience with Putin over Ukraine ceasefire

Published

on

By

Finnish president reveals Trump running out of patience with Putin over Ukraine ceasefire

The president of Finland says Donald Trump is running out of patience with Vladimir Putin and is frustrated with him.

The Finnish leader spoke to Sky News after spending the day with the US president and playing golf with him.

Alexander Stubb said Donald Trump is “the only person who can broker a peace, a ceasefire, because he’s the only one that Putin is afraid of” – but is tiring of the Russian leader’s tactics.

Kremlin responds to Trump’s ‘p***ed off’ comments – Ukraine latest

Donald Trump gestures as Finland's President Alexander Stubb stands next to him at at Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach.
Finnish Presidential Office/Reuters
Image:
Donald Trump played golf with Alexander Stubb at Mar-a-Lago, in Palm Beach, Florida. Pic: Finnish Presidential Office/Reuters


“There was a combination of impatience and a tad of frustration,” he said during their match in Florida over the weekend – and it wasn’t with his golf swing.

“We were talking a lot about the ceasefire and the frustrations he had that Russia was not committing to it.”

Mr Stubb’s comments confirm reports of a change in attitude by Mr Trump over the Russian leader.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump ‘disappointed’ in Putin

He has until recently seemed more than happy to give Putin the benefit of the doubt, applying enormous pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy instead.

Putin’s refusal to accept a 30-day ceasefire though is changing that, according to the Finnish leader.

He said: “If there was a pendulum of trust and distrust, certainly Russian activity in the past few weeks has proven that we’re moving more towards the distrust side of things.”

Mr Stubb is urging the imposition of colossal sanctions on Russia if it does not accept the ceasefire by a deadline that he says should be set for Easter.

The US is considering sanctions on Russian oil, he said. “Oil, oil prices, serious caps on oil.”

Read more
Could Trump seek a third term?
Trump ‘p***ed off with Putin’
Why Trump’s golf course won’t host Open

Republican senator Lindsey Graham, who also played golf with Mr Stubb on Saturday, is proposing what he has called “bone breaking sanctions” if it does not comply with ceasefire demands.

Sanctions failed to deter Russia from invading Ukraine in the first place or reverse its invasion since.

But Mr Stubb insists Russia’s economic pain is now reaching a critical point and sanctions could tip it over the brink.

He said: “You never underestimate the capacity of Russians to live through discomfort. I mean that’s what the Soviet Union was really about. But at the same time, there has to be a wall at some stage. And I think that wall is approaching.”

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at the APEC Summit in Da Nang, Vietnam, in 2017. File pic: AP
Image:
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Vietnam in 2017. File pic: AP

If Donald Trump is losing patience with Russia, is he prepared to do anything about it?

“I think we need a colossal amount of sanctions on 20 April if the Russians don’t abide by the ceasefire,” said Mr Stubb.

But is Donald Trump’s Finnish golfing partner confident he is going to apply that pressure?

“Fairly confident,’ he said. “More confident than hopeful.”

It may take more than that to persuade Putin there is something to really worry about.

Continue Reading

Trending