Exactly 20 years ago today, the now King and Queen were married in a small, private civil ceremony in Windsor.
The wedding, which was eight years after Princess Diana’s death, divided the nation – with royal aides even fearing the newlyweds might have things thrown at them.
But on 9 April 2025, life is very different for the couple, who have appeared relaxed and happy this week on their first royal visit to Italy as King and Queen.
Image: The King and Queen in Rome this week. Pic: Chris Jackson/Getty
In recent years, they have navigated the death of Queen Elizabeth II, the King’s ill-health, increasing Republican sentiment across the Commonwealth, and strained relationships with family members at home and abroad.
Here we look at their five-decade relationship – and how things have changed since they got married.
‘They hold each other up’
The late Queen Elizabeth II famously referred to the Duke of Edinburgh as her “strength and stay” during their 73-year marriage.
In Charles and Camilla’s relationship, humour plays a big role in coping with the demands of royal life, Kristina Kyriacou, who served as the King’s communications secretary from 2009 to 2018, tells Sky News.
“I would often see them laughing with one another – at some engagements they’d even take to the dance floor together,” she says.
Image: The Royal Family pose for a photograph on Charles and Camilla’s wedding day. Pic: PA
Image: The King’s Speech during the state opening of Parliament in July 2024. Pic: Reuters
King Charles and Queen Camilla are like “bookends” to one another, former BBC royal correspondent Michael Cole tells Sky News.
“They hold each other up. They’re very devoted to one another,” he says.
‘No-nonsense’ Queen stepped up during King’s illness
In the past year we’ve really seen that no-nonsense side of Camilla, prepared to roll her sleeves up and get on with it.
When the King’s cancer diagnosis forced him to step away from public duties, it was striking to see how she stepped in.
Public opinions have softened, in some cases it’s probably a case of people just getting used to her being around.
Not everyone can quite get to grips with calling her Queen – the footsteps of Queen Elizabeth II are considerable ones to follow. But like Elizabeth’s husband Prince Philip, Camilla knows her role is to support, to be the listening ear, and as we often see, enjoy those times when she and the King can laugh together.
From the early years of them having to hide their relationship away, it couldn’t be more different now.
On their anniversary night they’ll be guests of honour at a glittering state banquet in Rome. Accepted, centre stage, and ultimately representing the United Kingdom.
Fears eggs would be thrown at wedding
But it hasn’t always been easy – as many longstanding royal watchers will remember.
When they were married, in the eyes of some, Camilla was still the “third person” in her husband’s previous marriage to Princess Diana.
With the late Queen’s blessing to take her title when she died in 2022, Queen Camilla is now part of the “bedrock” of the Royal Family, according to royal experts.
During a rare interview with British Vogue to mark her 75th birthday in 2022, the Queen recalled: “I was scrutinised for such a long time that you just have to find a way to live with it.
“Nobody likes to be looked at all the time and criticised. But I think in the end, I sort of rise above it and get on with it.”
Image: The couple with the late Queen after their blessing in Windsor in April 2005. Pic: PA
Amid lingering public discontent over the breakdown of Charles and Diana’s marriage, his second wedding was a muted affair.
It was held at the Windsor Guildhall and not broadcast live on television. Charles didn’t wear his military garb and Camilla didn’t wear white.
The late Queen didn’t attend the ceremony but was there for the reception at Windsor Castle.
Mr Cole says: “Buckingham Palace had a real fear they would have eggs thrown at them, so the ceremonial parades were kept to a minimum.”
Camilla, out of respect for Diana, took Duchess of Cornwall as her title, not Princess of Wales. Almost two decades later, however, she received the ultimate symbol of approval when the late Queen ruled that Camilla would replace her as Queen when she died.
“They’ve just gone out there consistently and done their job and I think they’ve earned respect for that,” Ms Kyriacou says. “Eventually memories fade and people instead accept people for who they are.”
Image: Charles and Camilla on the way to their honeymoon in 2005. Pic: PA
Image: Charles and Camilla at a polo event in June 2005. Pic: PA
Image: The couple in February 2005. Pic: PA
“It was all done gradually,” Mr Cole says. “Step by step, the idea that they were together was introduced to the public.”
So how did it all begin?
Timeline of Charles and Camilla
1967: Camilla begins an on-off relationship with Andrew Parker Bowles
1970: Their relationship ends and Charles and Camilla begin dating
1972: Their relationship ends and Charles joins the Navy
1973: Camilla and Andrew rekindle their romance and get married
1980: Charles starts dating Lady Diana Spencer
1981: Charles and Diana get married
1989: The “Tampongate” recording takes place but it is not published
1992: Charles and Diana separate, with “no plans to divorce”
1993: The “Tampongate” tapes are published by an Australian magazine
1994: Charles admits being unfaithful to Diana
1995: Camilla and Andrew Parker Bowles divorce and Diana does her Newsnight interview
1996: Charles and Diana’s divorce is finalised
1997: Diana dies in a car crash in Paris
1999: Charles and Camilla go public at her sister’s birthday party
2000: Camilla meets the Queen
2005: Charles and Camilla get engaged in February and get married in April
2022: Charles and Camilla become King and Queen
2024:King and Princess of Wales reveal cancer diagnoses
2025: Catherine in remission from cancer, King continues treatment
Failed first relationship
The relationship stretches back 55 years, to when Prince Charles and Camilla Shand are thought to have met for the first time at a polo match in London in 1970.
Camilla, the daughter of an esteemed military officer, had been in an on-off relationship with Andrew Parker Bowles, a captain with The Blues and Royals regiment of the British Army.
Image: Charles and Camilla at a polo match in 1975. Pic: Shutterstock
Charles had only been officially invested with the title of the Prince of Wales a year earlier and was fresh out of Cambridge University and RAF training.
Having bonded over a shared love of polo and countryside pursuits, they dated for around two years before the prince left to join the Navy and Camilla rekindled her romance with Mr Parker Bowles, marrying him a year later in 1973.
Image: Charles and Camilla leave the theatre in London in February 1975. Pic: PA
Over the years, many have cited the now King’s military commitments as the reason their initial relationship broke down.
But Mr Cole recalls it differently. “It would be wrong to say that he ‘missed the bus’ and could have married her then, but hesitated,” he says. “The fact was she loved Andrew Parker Bowles.”
He adds that at that point, Camilla would not have been considered by the Queen and her advisers to be a suitable bride for the heir to the throne because she had a “past” (as it was put then) – meaning earlier relationships before meeting Charles.
‘Third person’ in Charles and Diana’s marriage
In the years that followed, the young Prince Charles was under pressure to marry and began dating Lady Diana Spencer, the younger sister of his ex-girlfriend Sarah.
Image: Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer pose for their engagement photo in 1981. Pic: PA
Image: Camilla and Andrew Parker Bowles at Buckingham Palace in 1984 with their children to get his OBE from the Queen. Pic: PA
By that stage, Camilla had given birth to two children, Tom in 1974 and Laura in 1978.
Diana famously told Newsnight in 1995 that “there were three of us in this marriage” – the third person being Camilla.
Image: Camilla and Diana in October 1980. Pic: PA
Charles admitted adultery in a 1994 interview with Jonathan Dimbleby – a precursor to Diana’s explosive Newsnight interview. He confessed he had been unfaithful after their marriage “irretrievably broke down”.
Further evidence came in the form of the “Tampongate” tape, a recording of a phone call between Charles and Camilla in which they exchanged sexual innuendos.
While the contents of the call weren’t leaked until 1993 – a year after Charles and Diana announced their separation – the conversation reportedly took place in 1989, when they were both married to other people.
Image: Charles and Camilla at the Mey Highland Games in 2003. Pic: PA
Charles Anson, former press secretary to Queen Elizabeth II from 1990 to 1997, says that while it wasn’t palace business to be commenting on private relationships, it was an “issue” that had to be navigated carefully.
“It was a feature of life at that time and therefore something that needed to be handled,” he says. “Prince Charles and Camilla were part of the landscape.”
According to Mr Cole, it was always Charles driving their relationship in the early days.
“She was happy with her life in the countryside, with her children, and would have been quite happy to remain his mistress – she didn’t expect anything else,” he says. “But for Charles it was non-negotiable, he had to have her.”
Image: The pair at Sandringham in March 2002. Pic: PA
Going public
The breakdown of Charles and Diana’s marriage dominated headlines as one of the biggest news stories of its time.
It wasn’t until after Diana died that Charles and Camilla officially appeared in public together – at a birthday party for Camilla’s sister Annabel Elliot at the Ritz Hotel in early 1999.
Image: Camilla arrives at her 50th birthday party at Highgrove in July 1997. Pic: PA
However, a month before Diana’s death in Paris in the summer of 1997, Charles threw a birthday party for Camilla at his Gloucestershire country home, Highgrove.
The late Queen did not attend. She reportedly only agreed to formally meet Camilla in 2000.
Image: Charles and Camilla pictured as a couple in public together for the first time in London in 1999. Pic: PA
Image: The couple attend a Prince’s Foundation gala in June 2000. Pic: PA
Standing the test of time
Mr Anson, former press secretary to Queen Elizabeth II from 1990 to 1997, now describes their relationship as the “bedrock of the monarchy”.
Ultimately, it’s their love for one another which has seen their “partnership stand the test of time”, Ms Kyriacou says.
“I remember King Charles consistently referring to Queen Camilla as his ‘darling wife’. And that’s very touching – and it’s how I will remember them on their 20th wedding anniversary.”
Image: At a Clarence House reception in March 2025. Pic: PA
In her Vogue interview, the Queen revealed they always try to make quality time for one another.
“It’s not easy sometimes, but we do always try to have a point in the day when we meet,” she said. “Sometimes it’s like ships passing in the night, but we always sit down together and have a cup of tea and discuss the day.”
Ms Kyriacou remembers this, telling Sky News: “They don’t do every single engagement together, but no matter what, they will try to share breakfast or dinner.
“Being a member of the Royal Family is a privileged position but my impression was that it must also be very lonely when you are constantly under intense public scrutiny – your inner circle is so small. So to have someone you can trust implicitly, who you can share everything with and who understands that is what carries them through.”
Image: The King and Queen prepare donation bags with dates for Ramadan in February 2025. Pic: Reuters
Image: Stopping for a whiskey tasting on Northern Ireland visit. Pic: Reuters
This has likely been even more important as the King navigates his cancer treatment, she adds.
“For over 50 years of public life he has been indefatigable in terms of how many engagements he takes on,” Ms Kyriacou says.
“So he tries not to draw attention to himself. He tells people just enough, but he’s still trying to be humorous, compassionate, affable. And the Queen understands this – that he cannot let his emotions come first – that his public persona has to stay very neutral.”
Image: The couple during a visit to a Samoan village in 2024. Pic: Reuters
Image: The King and Queen lead the Royal Family as they arrive at church on Christmas Day 2024. Pic: PA
But she will also use that “mutual respect” to be firm with him about what he needs.
“Particularly in these times of ill-health, I should imagine the Queen can temper the King’s workaholic nature and make strong suggestions to him to take more time to relax,” she says.
“Everything challenging they’ve been through will almost certainly have been halved because they’ve gone through it together.”
Nigel Farage has told Sky News he would allow some essential migration in areas with skill shortages but that numbers would be capped.
The Reform UK leader said he would announce the cap “in four years’ time” after he was pressed repeatedly by Sky’s deputy political editor Sam Coates about his manifesto pledge to freeze “non-essential” immigration.
It was put to Mr Farage that despite his criticism of the government’s migration crackdown, allowing essential migration in his own plans is quite a big caveat given the UK’s skills shortages.
However the Clacton MP said he would allow people to plug the gaps on “time dependent work permits” rather than on longer-term visas.
He said: “Let’s take engineering, for argument’s sake. We don’t train enough engineers, we just don’t. It’s crazy.
“We’ve been pushing young people to doing social sciences degrees or whatever it is.
“So you’re an engineering company, you need somebody to come in on skills. If they come in, on a time dependent work permit, if all the right health assurances and levies have been paid and if at the end of that period of time, you leave or you’re forced to leave, then it works.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
28:27
‘We need to reduce immigration’
Reform’s manifesto, which they call a “contract”, says that “essential skills, mainly around healthcare, must be the only exception” to migration.
Pressed on how wide his exemption would be, Mr Farage said he hopes enough nurses and doctors will be trained “not to need anybody from overseas within the space of a few years”.
He said that work permits should be separate to immigration, adding: “If you get a job for an American TV station and you stay 48 hours longer than your work permit, they will smash your front door down, put you in handcuffs and deport you.
“We allow all of these routes, whether it’s coming into work, whether it’s coming as a student, we have allowed all of these to become routes for long-term migration.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:51
Sky’s Sam Coates questions PM on migration
Asked if he would put a cap on his essential skills exemption, he said: “We will. I can’t tell you the numbers right now, I don’t have all the figures. What I can tell you is anyone that comes in will not be allowed to stay long-term. That’s the difference.”
Pressed if that was a commitment to a cap under a Reform UK government, he suggested he would set out further detail ahead of the next election, telling Coates: “Ask me in four years’ time, all right?”
Mr Farage was speaking after the government published an immigration white paper which pledged to ban overseas care workers as part of a package of measures to bring down net migration.
The former Brexit Party leader claimed the proposals were a “knee jerk reaction” to his party’s success at the local elections and accused the prime minister of not having the vigour to “follow them through”.
However he said he supports the “principle” of banning foreign care workers and conceded he might back some of the measures if they are put to a vote in parliament.
He said: “If it was stuff that did actually bind the government, there might be amendments on this that you would support. But I’m not convinced.”
The combination of full prisons and tight public finances has forced the government to urgently rethink its approach.
Top of the agenda for an overhaul are short sentences, which look set to give way to more community rehabilitation.
The cost argument is clear – prison is expensive. It’s around £60,000 per person per year compared to community sentences at roughly £4,500 a year.
But it’s not just saving money that is driving the change.
Research shows short custodial terms, especially for first-time offenders, can do more harm than good, compounding criminal behaviour rather than acting as a deterrent.
Image: Charlie describes herself as a former ‘junkie shoplifter’
This is certainly the case for Charlie, who describes herself as a former “junkie, shoplifter from Leeds” and spoke to Sky News at Preston probation centre.
She was first sent down as a teenager and has been in and out of prison ever since. She says her experience behind bars exacerbated her drug use.
More on Prisons
Related Topics:
Image: Charlie in February 2023
“In prison, I would never get clean. It’s easy, to be honest, I used to take them in myself,” she says. “I was just in a cycle of getting released, homeless, and going straight back into trap houses, drug houses, and that cycle needs to be broken.”
Eventually, she turned her life around after a court offered her drug treatment at a rehab facility.
She says that after decades of addiction and criminality, one judge’s decision was the turning point.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
“That was the moment that changed my life and I just want more judges to give more people that chance.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:22
How to watch Sophy Ridge’s special programme live from Preston Prison
Also at Preston probation centre, but on the other side of the process, is probation officer Bex, who is also sceptical about short sentences.
“They disrupt people’s lives,” she says. “So, people might lose housing because they’ve gone to prison… they come out homeless and may return to drug use and reoffending.”
Image: Bex works with offenders to turn their lives around
Bex has seen first-hand the value of alternative routes out of crime.
“A lot of the people we work with have had really disjointed lives. It takes a long time for them to trust someone, and there’s some really brilliant work that goes on every single day here that changes lives.”
It’s people like Bex and Charlie, and places like Preston probation centre, that are at the heart of the government’s change in direction.
“As far as I’m concerned, there’s only three ways to spend the taxpayers’ hard-earned when it comes to prisons. More walls, more bars and more guards.”
Prison reform is one of the hardest sells in government.
Hospitals, schools, defence – these are all things you would put on an election leaflet.
Even the less glamorous end of the spectrum – potholes and bin collections – are vote winners.
But prisons? Let’s face it, the governor’s quote from the Shawshank Redemption reflects public polling pretty accurately.
It’s a phrase that is frequently used so carelessly that it’s been diluted into cliche. But in this instance, it is absolutely correct.
More on Crime
Related Topics:
Without some kind of intervention, the prison system is at breaking point.
It will break.
Inside Preston Prison
Ahead of the government’s Sentencing Review, expected to recommend more non-custodial sentences, I’ve been talking to staff and inmates at Preston Prison, a Category B men’s prison originally built in 1790.
Overcrowding is at 156% here, according to the Howard League.
Image: Sophy Ridge talking outside Preston Prison
One prisoner I interviewed, in for burglary, was, until a few hours before, sharing his cell with his son.
It was his son’s first time in jail – but not his. He had been out of prison since he was a teenager. More than 30 years – in and out of prison.
His family didn’t like it, he said, and now he has, in his own words, dragged his son into it.
Sophie is a prison officer and one of those people who would be utterly brilliant doing absolutely anything, and is exactly the kind of person we should all want working in prisons.
She said the worst thing about the job is seeing young men, at 18, 19, in jail for the first time. Shellshocked. Mental health all over the place. Scared.
And then seeing them again a couple of years later.
And then again.
The same faces. The officers get to know them after a while, which in a way is nice but also terrible.
Image: Sophy Ridge talking to one of the officers who works within Preston Prison
The £18bn spectre of reoffending
We know the stats about reoffending, but it floored me how the system is failing. It’s the same people. Again and again.
The Sentencing Review, which we’re just days away from, will almost certainly recommend fewer people go to prison, introducing more non-custodial or community sentencing and scrapping short sentences that don’t rehabilitate but instead just start people off on the reoffending merry-go-round, like some kind of sick ride.
But they’ll do it on the grounds of cost (reoffending costs £18bn a year, a prison place costs £60,000 a year, community sentences around £4,500 per person).
They’ll do it because prisons are full (one of Keir Starmer’s first acts was being forced to let prisoners out early because there was no space).
If the government wants to be brave, however, it should do it on the grounds of reform, because prison is not working and because there must be a better way.
Image: Inside Preston Prison, Sky News saw first-hand a system truly at breaking point
A cold, hard look
I’ve visited prisons before, as part of my job, but this was different.
Before it felt like a PR exercise, I was taken to one room in a pristine modern prison where prisoners were learning rehabilitation skills.
This time, I felt like I really got under the skin of Preston Prison.
It’s important to say that this is a good prison, run by a thoughtful governor with staff that truly care.
But it’s still bloody hard.
“You have to be able to switch off,” one officer told me, “Because the things you see….”
Staff are stretched and many are inexperienced because of high turnover.
After a while, I understood something that had been nagging me. Why have I been given this access? Why are people being so open with me? This isn’t what usually happens with prisons and journalists.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:10
Probation centres answer to UK crime?
That’s when I understood.
They want people to know. They want people to know that yes, they do an incredible job and prisons aren’t perfect, but they’re not as bad as you think.
But that’s despite the government, not because of it.
Sometimes the worst thing you can do on limited resources is to work so hard you push yourself to the brink, so the system itself doesn’t break, because then people think ‘well maybe we can continue like this after all… maybe it’s okay’.
But things aren’t okay. When people say the system is at breaking point – this time it isn’t a cliche.