Connect with us

Published

on

Guests including Mark Zuckerberg, Lauren Sanchez, Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai and Elon Musk attend the inauguration of Donald J. Trump in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20, 2025. Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the U.S.

Julia Demaree Nikhinson | Getty Images

As tech’s megacap companies enter first-quarter earnings season this week, get ready to hear one word on repeat: uncertainty.

President Donald Trump’s on-again, off-again approach to tariffs has created market chaos this month — including five days of massive moves for the Nasdaq — as investors try to gauge the future impact on revenue and earnings for American companies that rely on imports.

Beyond the increase in costs are the follow-on effects, such as the likely drop-off in ad spending that comes with tighter budgets and the potential slowdown in consumer spending that could result from higher prices and rising unemployment.

Trump’s tariffs face almost universal disapproval in the corporate world, which became clear as trillions of dollars in value evaporated in a matter of days, and some of the president’s most vocal supporters, including Elon Musk, voiced opposition.

Beyond being bad for business, the tariff picture changes by the day, making it almost impossible for companies to plan for the future when considering where to manufacture, whether to continue hiring and how aggressively to market products.

On April 9, following four days of market turmoil, Trump dropped tariffs to 10% for most trade partners (while increasing the levy on China to 145%) for 90 days to allow negotiations with those countries. Since then, the Trump administration has signaled that phones, computers and chips would be exempted from the new tariffs, but the president then added to the confusion by casting doubt on the duration of the exemptions, which were viewed as a boon most notably for Apple.

When Tesla kicks off tech earnings on Tuesday, followed by Alphabet on Thursday, executive teams will likely face forward-looking questions that may be difficult to answer.

Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and Apple are all slated to report results next week. Chipmaker Nvidia reports in late May.

As of Thursday’s close, the Nasdaq was down 16% for the year and 6% in April. The first quarter was the worst for the index in almost three years.

Here are some of the key issues facing each tech megacap, in order of when they report:

Tesla

A Tesla car showroom stands doused in blue paint following vandalism by activists of the group New Generation on March 31, 2025 in Berlin, Germany. 

Omer Messinger | Getty Images

Tesla’s Tuesday report lands against a murky backdrop for the electric vehicle maker.

The stock is down 40% for the year so far after closing out its worst quarter since 2022 in March. The big story has been Musk’s many distractions outside of Tesla, most notably his work slashing the federal government as part of the Trump administration.

Tariffs are also a problem, as the company relies on suppliers in Mexico and China for items like automotive glass, printed circuit boards and battery cells, among other parts essential for the production of its cars. Tesla has sought an exemption from the U.S. Trade Representative for equipment imported from China that it uses in its factories.

On the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call in January, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja cautioned shareholders that the Trump administration’s tariffs would have an “impact on our business and profitability.”

For the first quarter, analysts are projecting revenue growth of less than 1% from a year earlier, followed by a slight year-over-year slippage in the second quarter. Investors will want to see if Musk can provide any clarity on how costly tariffs could be going forward. Musk has made his thoughts on the matter fairly clear, calling Trump’s top trade advisor and tariff proponent Peter Navarro a “moron” and “dumber than a sack of bricks.”

Tesla’s business was already under pressure before tariffs and uncertainty roiled markets. In early April, the company reported 337,000 vehicle deliveries in the first quarter, a 13% decline from the previous year. To win over customers in the face of a Musk-induced backlash, and to get customers to buy inventory cars when a new Model Y is on the way, the company had to offer an array of incentives and discounts in the first quarter.

Piper Sandler analysts last week revised their Tesla price target lower, saying after the first-quarter whiff on deliveries that “gross margin is probably trending near multi-year lows.”

Alphabet

Alphabet Inc. and Google CEO Sundar Pichai speaks during the inauguration of a Google Artificial Intelligence (AI) hub in Paris on February 15, 2024. 

Alain Jocard | AFP | Getty Images

Google parent Alphabet faces an online ad market that’s on edge due to concerns about how Trump’s tariffs will affect the economy and business spending.

A note last week from Piper Sandler pointed to fears of an 18% impact to growth forecasts for the 2025 global ad market. Chinese discount e-commerce apps Temu and Shein, which have been big advertisers in the U.S. in recent years, are of notable concern, and Temu has already pulled way back on spending.

Retail represents at least 21% of Google ad revenue, according to estimates by Oppenheimer & Co., which said that Meta has even more exposure to ad pullbacks.

Investors are equally concerned about the cloud business, as Alphabet is a massive spender on imported data center infrastructure, and is going even bigger to keep up with the AI boom. The company has said it plans to spend $75 billion this year, mostly going toward servers and data centers to power AI and its cloud business.

It’s unclear whether Google will adjust that figure, but such a move may be necessary. Mizuho analysts wrote on April 8 that roughly 25% of Google channel partner customers have reduced spending on the company’s cloud, and “we expect that mix to increase to 50% from elevated customer hesitation” after the tariff announcement.

Though Alphabet doesn’t make a large chunk of its revenue from consumer hardware, it does produce its Pixel and Fitbit products abroad and runs its services on the most popular phone carriers. Pixel products are manufactured in India, after the company began diversifying its supply chain away from China.

Meta

(L-R) UFC CEO Dana White and Mark Zuckerberg attend the UFC 300 event at T-Mobile Arena on April 13, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Jeff Bottari | UFC | Getty Images

Meta has a small hardware business, focused largely on selling virtual reality devices. That’s not the biggest concern for investors.

Rather, like with Google, it’s the potential impact of the tariffs on the economy and the willingness of businesses to spend on digital ads. In Meta’s case, that means ads on Facebook and Instagram.

Meta acknowledged the negative impact of a U.S.-China trade dispute in its latest annual report, noting that an action “that reduces or eliminates our China-based advertising revenue” would “adversely affect” financial results. Meta’s China revenue was $18.35 billion in 2024, representing a little over 11% of total sales.

Analysts say Temu and Shien represent the bulk of Meta’s China sales. Bank of America analysts wrote in a recent note that Meta could face “3% revenue exposure to Temu and Shein in the US” due to the tariffs. While the “tariff situation still remains fluid,” the firm said companies will reduce online ad spending due to a weakening economy. The analysts reduced their estimate for 2025 revenue by 4.4% to $179.8 billion.

Oppenheimer analysts wrote in a recent note that the China trade war will hurt Meta more than Google, because it’s “more exposed to discretionary spending” and China. The firm warned that companies are more likely to cut ad spending on social media than search, based on a March survey of advertisers from the Interactive Advertising Bureau.

Where costs could be a concern for Meta is in the data center, as CEO Mark Zuckerberg said earlier this year that the company would spend $60 billion to $65 billion in capex in 2025, calling it a “defining year for AI.” The bulk of that infrastructure has to be imported from Asia, and analysts will have plenty of questions for the company about how much more it will have to spend to continue its AI advancements.

Microsoft

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella waves during an event celebrating the 50th Anniversary of Microsoft on April 4, 2025 in Redmond, Washington. The company also gave an update on Copilot, its AI tool. 

Stephen Brashear | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Microsoft makes PCs and video game consoles, but it derives most of its revenue from selling software. The company buys lots of hardware to operate cloud services for its clients, transactions that are subject to significantly higher costs due to tariffs.

In early January, Microsoft announced it was aiming to spend more than $80 billion this fiscal year on data centers capable of handling artificial intelligence workloads.

Where investors may be most concerned for Microsoft is in the company’s expansive customer base and whether Trump’s trade policies will lead clients to cut spending on products.

“There’s not a direct tariff impact, and so what we talk about is indirect,” said Brent Bracelin, an analyst at Piper Sandler. He recommends buying Microsoft shares.

Recent surveys indicate that software sales cycles are lengthening and interest in buying new software is waning, Bracelin said. Other analysts have said Microsoft, along with Salesforce, are among the software vendors that are best able to handle higher tariffs.

“We see MSFT and CRM as two of the names best positioned to weather this macro storm as they are already back at/near 2022 trough levels and can adjust spending/capex levels for this ‘new reality’ if needed to preserve” earnings and cash, Evercore ISI analysts wrote in a note earlier this month.

Amazon

Attendees walk through an exposition hall at AWS re:Invent, a conference hosted by Amazon Web Services, in Las Vegas on Dec. 3, 2024.

Noah Berger | Getty Images

Amazon’s position as an e-commerce juggernaut gives it hefty exposure to potential tariff headwinds, and not just because of consumer spending.

More than 60% of Amazon’s sales are from items sold by third-party merchants, and many of those sellers source their products from China. The remaining 40% comes from vendors Amazon purchases from directly.

Within days of Trump’s new tariffs, Amazon canceled some of those merchandise orders from vendors in China, while Amazon sellers have said they’re considering raising the price of their products.

Investors will be listening for any commentary around the impact of tariffs on its online stores business, especially as Amazon’s summer Prime Day discount event nears. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told CNBC last week the company will work to keep prices low on its website, but that sellers may need to “pass the cost” of tariffs on to consumers.

“Amazon is probably the best-positioned company in retail and e-commerce to take advantage of the chaotic situation from tariffs and shifting global supply chains,” Barclays analysts, who have a buy rating on Amazon, wrote in a recent report. “The pandemic was a precursor of this, during which Amazon was able to gain share and move quicker than peers despite its massive size.”

The company’s advertising unit could be “pressured more if trade wars get worse,” analysts at Cantor Fitzgerald, who also recommend buying the stock, wrote in a note on April 15. Most of Amazon’s ad revenue comes from sponsored product ads that appear in search results on its website. Businesses could pull back on their ad spend as they look to conserve costs or reduce traffic to products sourced from China.

And like the other hyperscalers, Amazon has all of the potential added costs associated with tariffs on advanced chips and other data center equipment, depending on what products end up getting exempted. Amazon Web Services is the market leader in cloud infrastructure, ahead of Microsoft and Google.

Apple

People shop at an Apple store in Grand Central Station in New York on April 4, 2025.

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

Apple has outsized exposure to Trump’s tariffs, as the company generates about three-quarters of its revenue from selling devices that are mostly manufactured in Asia. While Apple got an apparent reprieve when the Trump administration suspended tariffs on computers from China earlier this month, the company still faces significant uncertainty with the possibility of another Trump shift.

Apple has tried to hedge its China risk in recent years, bolstering manufacturing capacity in countries including Vietnam and India. Officials in India said that Apple loaded planes full of iPhones made in the country and sent them to the U.S. in response to tariffs.

Wall Street has been dumping shares of the iPhone maker, sending the stock down 8% in March and another 11% so far this month, a recognition of how damaging long-term tariffs would likely be on Apple’s business.

CEO Tim Cook, along with many of his tech counterparts, has tried cozying up to President Trump, donating to his inauguration in January and attending the event in Washington, D.C. But investors have yet to hear how Cook and the rest of the management team plan to deal with the increased costs, how the company is managing inventory and how it will all add up to affect margins.

Nvidia

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang delivers the keynote address during the Nvidia GTC 2025 at SAP Center on March 18, 2025 in San Jose, California. 

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Nvidia’s graphics processing units (GPUs) are key to the AI infrastructure buildouts across the tech industry. While semiconductors have a tariff exemption, many of the AI servers that have driven the recent boom have been shipped to the U.S. as mostly finished computers, putting them at risk of tariffs.

Since an AI server can cost upwards of $50,000, even small tariffs could have a big impact on costs. And the almost tenfold increase in Nvidia’s stock price over the past two calendar years has baked into it an assumption that sales and profit margins will keep inflating.

Investors will want to hear from CEO Jensen Huang about his relationship with Trump, given the potential importance of that dynamic.

Nvidia said last week that it would produce its “AI supercomputers” in Texas, days after Huang met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. Nvidia also said it would buy and package chip production services from companies in Arizona. The company said it would “produce” a half-trillion dollars in AI infrastructure over the next four years.

The White House praised the move, and said in a press release that Nvidia was leading an “American-made chips boom.” Nvidia’s plans for U.S. production will rely on the company getting exceptions for many of the parts it will need to build the computers.

Nvidia’s concern with the government isn’t just about tariffs. The company said last week that it will take a quarterly charge of about $5.5 billion tied to exporting H20 graphics processing units to China and other destinations.

During President Joe Biden’s administration, the U.S. restricted AI chip exports and then updated the rules to prevent the sale of more advanced AI processors. The H20 is an AI chip for China that was designed to comply with U.S. export restrictions. It generated an estimated $12 billion to $15 billion in revenue in 2024.

— CNBC’s Lora Kolodny, Jennifer Elias, Jonathan Vanian, Jordan Novet, Annie Palmer and Kif Leswing contributed to this report.

WATCH: Tech earnings mirage

The tech earnings mirage: Why surface level strength could spell trouble

Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung backs South Korean AI chip startup Rebellions ahead of IPO

Published

on

By

Samsung backs South Korean AI chip startup Rebellions ahead of IPO

The Rebel-Quad is the second-generation product from Rebellions and is made up of four Rebel AI chips. Rebellions, a South Korean firm, is looking to rival companies like Nvidia in AI chips.

Rebellions

South Korean artificial intelligence chip startup Rebellions has raised money from tech giant Samsung and is targeting a funding round of up to $200 million ahead of a public listing, the company’s management told CNBC on Tuesday.

Last year, Rebellions merged with another startup in South Korea called Sapeon, creating a firm that is being positioned as one of the country’s promising rivals to Nvidia.

Rebellions is currently raising money and is targeting funding of between $150 million and $200 million, Sungkyue Shin, chief financial officer of the startup, told CNBC on Tuesday.

Samsung’s investment in Rebellions last week was part of that, Shin said, though he declined to say how much the tech giant poured in.

Since its founding in 2020, Rebellions has raised $220 million, Shin added.

The current funding round is ongoing and Shin said Rebellions is talking to its current investors as well as investors in Korea and globally to participate in the capital raise. Rebellions has some big investors, including South Korean chip giant SK Hynix, telecommunication firms SK Telecom and Korea Telecom, and Saudi Arabian oil giant Aramco.

AI chip startup Rebellions looks to raise up to $200 million ahead of IPO

Rebellions was last valued at $1 billion. Shin said the current round of funding would push the valuation over $1 billion but declined to give specific figure.

Rebellions is aiming for an initial public offering once this funding round has closed.

“Our master plan is going public,” Shin said.

Rebellions designs chips that are focused on AI inferencing rather than training. Inferencing is when a pre-trained AI model interprets live data to come up with a result, much like the answers that are produced by popular chatbots.

With the backing of major South Korean firms and investors, Rebellions is hoping to make a global play where it will look to challenge Nvidia and AMD as well as a slew of other startups in the inferencing space.

Samsung collaboration

Rebellions has been working with Samsung to bring its second-generation chip, Rebel, to market. Samsung owns a chip manufacturing business, also known as foundry. Four Rebel chips are put together to make the Rebel-Quad, the product that Rebellions will eventually sell. A Rebellions spokesperson said the chip will be launched later this year.

The funding will partly go toward Rebellions’ product development. Rebellions is currently testing its chip which will eventually be produced on a larger scale by Samsung.

“Initial results have been very promising,” Sunghyun Park, CEO of Rebellions, told CNBC on Tuesday.

South Korean AI startup Rebellions says tariffs could delay IPO by 'a little bit'

Park said Samsung invested in Rebellions partly because of the the good results that the chip has so far produced.

Samsung is manufacturing Rebellions’ semiconductor using its 4 nanometer process, which is among the leading-edge chipmaking nodes. For comparison, Nvidia’s current Blackwell chips use the 4 nanometer process from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Rebellions will also use Samsung’s high bandwidth memory, known as HBM3e. This type of memory is stacked and is required to handle large data processing loads.

That could turn out to be a strategic win for Samsung, which is a very distant second to TSMC in terms of market share in the foundry business. Samsung has been looking to boost its chipmaking division. Samsung Electronics recently entered into a $16.5 billion contract for supplying semiconductors to Tesla.

If Rebellions manages to find a large customer base, this could give Samsung a major customer for its foundry business.

Continue Reading

Technology

Europe sets its sights on multi-billion-euro gigawatt factories as it plays catch-up on AI

Published

on

By

Europe sets its sights on multi-billion-euro gigawatt factories as it plays catch-up on AI

Data storage tapes are stored at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) facility at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which will house the U.S. supercomputer to be powered by Nvidia’s forthcoming Vera Rubin chips, in Berkeley, California, U.S. May 29, 2025.

Manuel Orbegozo | Reuters

Europe is setting its sights on gigawatt factories in a bid to bolster its lagging artificial intelligence industry and meet the challenges of a rapidly-changing sector.

Buzz around the concept of factories that industrialize manufacturing AI has gained ground in recent months, particularly as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stressed the importance of the infrastructure at a June event. Huang hailed a new “industrial revolution” at the GTC conference in Paris, France, and said his firm was working to help countries build revenue-generating AI factories through partnerships in France, Italy and the U.K.

For its part, the European Union describes the factories as a “dynamic ecosystem” that brings together computing power, data and talent to create AI models and applications.

The bloc has long been a laggard behind the U.S. and China in the race to scale up artificial intelligence. With 27 members in the union, the region is slower to act when it comes to agreeing new legislation. Higher energy costs, permitting delays and a grid in dire need of modernization can also hamper developments.

Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s executive vice president for tech sovereignty, told CNBC that the bloc’s goal is to bring together high quality data sets, computing capacity and researchers, all in one place.

“We have, for example, 30% more researchers per capita than the U.S. has, focused on AI. Also we have around 7,000 startups [that] are developing AI, but the main obstacle for them is that they have very limited computing capacity. And that’s why we decided that, together with our member states, we are investing in this very crucial infrastructure,” she said.

These are very big investments because they are four times more powerful when it comes to computing capacities than the biggest AI factories.

Henna Virkkunen

European Commission’s executive vice president for tech sovereignty

“We have everything what is needed to be competitive in this sector, but at the same time we want to build up our technological sovereignty and our competitiveness.”

So far, the EU has put up 10 billion euros ($11.8 billion) in funding to set up 13 AI factories and 20 billion euros as a starting point for investment in the gigafactories, marking what it says is the “largest public investment in AI in the world.” The bloc has already received 76 expressions of interest in the gigafactories from 16 member states across 60 sites, Virkkunen said.

The call for interest in gigafactories was “overwhelming,” going far beyond the bloc’s expectations, Virkkunen noted. However, in order for the factories to make a noteworthy addition to Europe’s computing capacity, significantly more investment will be required from the private sector to fund the expensive infrastructure.

‘Intelligence revolution’

The EU describes the facilities as a “one-stop shop” for AI firms. They’re intended to mirror the process carried out in industrial factories, which transform raw materials into goods and services. With an AI factory, raw data goes into the input, and advanced AI products are the expected outcome.

It’s essentially a data center with additional infrastructure related to how the technology will be adopted, according to Andre Kukhnin, equity research analyst at UBS.

“The idea is to create GPU [graphics processing units] capacity, so to basically build data centers with GPUs that can train models and run inference… and then to create an infrastructure that allows you to make this accessible to SMEs and parties that would not be able to just go and build their own,” Kukhnin said.

How the facility will be used is key to its designation as an AI factory, adds Martin Wilkie, research analyst at Citi.

“You’re creating a platform by having these chips that have insane levels of compute capacity,” he said. “And if you’ve attached it to a grid that is able to get the power to actually use them to full capacity, then the world is at your feet. You have this enormous ability to do something, but what the success of it is, will be defined by what you use it for.”

Telecommunications firm Telenor is already exploring possible use cases for such facilities with the launch of its AI factory in Norway in November last year. The company currently has a small cluster of GPUs up and running, as it looks to test the market before scaling up.

Telenor’s Chief Innovation Officer and Head of the AI Factory Kaaren Hilsen and EVP Infrastructure Jannicke Hilland in front of a Nvidia rack at the firm’s AI factory

Telenor

“The journey started with a belief — Nvidia had a belief that every country needs to produce its own intelligence,” Telenor’s Chief Innovation Officer and Head of the AI Factory Kaaren Hilsen told CNBC.

Hilsen stressed that data sovereignty is key. “If you want to use AI to innovate and to make business more efficient, then you’re potentially putting business critical and business sensitive information into these AI models,” she said.

The company is working with BabelSpeak, which Hilsen described as a Norwegian version of ChatGPT. The technology translates sensitive dialogues, such as its pilot with the border police who can’t use public translation services because of security issues.

We’re experiencing an “intelligence revolution” whereby “sovereign AI factories can really help advance society,” Hilsen said.

Billion-euro investments

Virkkunen said the region’s first AI factory will be operational in coming weeks, with one of the biggest projects launching in Munich, Germany in the first days of September. It’s a different story for the gigafactories.

“These are very big investments because they are four times more powerful when it comes to computing capacities than the biggest AI factories, and it means billions in investments. Each of these need three to five billion [euros] in investment,” the commissioner said, adding that the bloc will look to set up a consortium of partners and then officially open a call for investment later this year.

Bertin Martens, senior research fellow at Bruegel, questioned why such investments needed to subsidized by government funds.

“We don’t know yet how much private investment has been proposed as a complement to the taxpayer subsidy, and what capacity and how big these factories are. This is still very much unclear at this stage, so it’s very hard to say how much this will add in terms of computing capacity,” he said.

Power consumption is also a key issue. Martens noted that building an AI gigafactory may take one to two years — but building a power generation of that size requires much more time.

“If you want to build a state-of-the-art gigafactory with hundreds of thousands of Nvidia chips, you have to count on the power consumption of at least one gigawatt for one of those factories. Whether there’s enough space in Europe’s electricity grid in all of these countries to create those factories remains to be seen… this will require major investment in power regeneration capacity,” he told CNBC.

UBS forecasts that the current installed global data center capacity of 85 GW will double due to soaring demand. Based on the EU’s 20-billion-euro investment and the plan for each factory to run 100,000 advanced processors, UBS estimates each factory could be around 100-150 MW with a total capacity for all of the facilities of around 1.5-2 GW.

That could add around 15% to Europe’s total capacity — a sizeable boost, even when compared to the U.S., which currently owns around a third of global capacity, according to the data.

Following the announcement of the EU-U.S. trade framework, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said Sunday that U.S. AI chips will help power the bloc’s AI gigafactories in a bid to help the States “maintain their technological edge.”

“One could argue that it’s relatively easy, provided you have the money. It’s relatively easy to buy the chips from Nvidia and to create these hardware factories, but to make it run and to make it economically viable is a completely different question,” Martens told CNBC.

He said that the EU will likely have to start at a smaller scale, as the region is unable to immediately build its own frontier models in AI because of their expense.

“I think in time, Europe can gradually build up its infrastructure and its business models around AI to reach that stage, but that will not happen immediately,” Martens said.

Continue Reading

Technology

India overtakes China in smartphone exports to the U.S. as manufacturing jumps 240%, report shows

Published

on

By

India overtakes China in smartphone exports to the U.S. as manufacturing jumps 240%, report shows

Workers assemble smartphones at Dixon Technologies’ Padget Electronics Pvt factory in Uttar Pradesh, India, on Jan. 28, 2021.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

India has overtaken China to become the top exporter of smartphones to the U.S., according to research firm Canalys, reflecting the shift in manufacturing supply chain away from Beijing amid tariff-fueled uncertainty.

Smartphones assembled in India accounted for 44% of U.S. imports of those devices in the second quarter, a significant increase from just 13% in the same period last year. Total volume of smartphones made in India soared 240% from a year earlier, Canalys said.

In contrast, the share of Chinese smartphone exports to the U.S. shrank to 25% in the quarter ended June, from 61% a year earlier, Canalys data released Monday showed. Vietnam’s share of smartphone exports to the U.S. was also higher than that of China at 30%.

The surge in shipments from India was primarily driven by Apple‘s accelerated shift toward the country at a time of heightened trade uncertainty between the U.S. and China, said Sanyam Chaurasia, principal analyst at Canalys. This is the first time India exported more smartphones to the U.S. than China.

Apple has reportedly been speeding up its plans to make most of its iPhones sold in the U.S. at factories in India this year, with the aim of manufacturing around a quarter of all iPhones in the country in the next few years.

Trump has threatened Apple with additional tariffs and urged the company’s CEO Tim Cook to make iPhones domestically, a move experts have said would be nearly impossible as it would push iPhone prices higher.

While many of Apple’s core products, including iPhones and Mac laptops, have received exemptions from Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs,” officials have warned that it could be a temporary reprieve.

Its global peers, Samsung Electronic and Motorola, have also been striving to move assembly for U.S.-bound smartphones to India, though their shift has been significantly slower and is limited in scale compared with Apple, according to Canalys.

Last-mile assembly

Many global manufacturers have been increasingly shifting their final assembly to India, allocating more capacity in the South-Asian nation to serve the U.S. market, said Renauld Anjoran, CEO of Agilian Technology, an electronics manufacturer in China.

The Guangdong-based company is now renovating a facility in India with plans to move part of its production to the country. “The plan for India is moving ahead as fast as we can,” Anjoran said. The company expects to begin trial production runs soon before ramping up to full-scale manufacturing.

While shipments, which represent the number of devices sent to retailers do not reflect final sales, they are a proxy for market demand.

Overall, iPhone shipments declined by 11% year on year to 13.3 million units in the second quarter, reversing the 25% growth in the prior quarter, according to Canalys.

Shares of Apple have tumbled 14% this year, partly on concerns over its high exposure to tariff uncertainty and intensifying competition in smartphones and artificial intelligence sector.

While the company has begun assembling iPhone 16 Pro models in India, it still relies heavily on China’s more mature manufacturing infrastructure to meet U.S. demand for the premium model, Canalys said.

In April, Trump imposed a 26% tariff on imports from India, much lower than the triple-digit tariffs on China at the time, before pausing those duties until an Aug 1. deadline.

— CNBC’s Arjun Kharpal contributed to this story.

Continue Reading

Trending