Harvard University is suing Donald Trump’s administration after it rejected a list of demands from the White House and had $2.2bn (£1.6bn) of government funding frozen.
The Ivy League institution, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is accused of ideological bias and allowing antisemitism during campus protests last year against Israel’s war in Gaza.
The Trump administration, which began a review of $9bn (£6.7bn) in federal grants for Harvard in March, had demanded the university screen international students for those “hostile to the American values” and the end of all diversity, equality and inclusion programmes.
Image: Protesters earlier this month at Harvard called on the university to resist interference by the federal government. Pic: Reuters
Image: Students at a rally last week at Harvard against Donald Trump’s funding policies. Pic: AP
The university’s president Alan Garber has remained defiant and rejected those and other reforms, prompting the US President to question whether the university should lose its tax-exempt status.
Mr Trump accused the institution of pushing what he called “political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?'” in a post on Truth Social.
Harvard has seen student-led protests in recent days calling on the institution to resist interference by the federal government.
Harvard’s lawsuit, filed in Boston, described the research funding freeze as “arbitrary and capricious” and violating its First Amendment rights.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
“The government has not – and cannot – identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America’s position as a global leader in innovation,” the court documents revealed.
Image: Harvard University has rejected a series of demands from the White House. File pic: AP
On Monday, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields issued a defiant response to the lawsuit: “The gravy train of federal assistance to institutions like Harvard, which enrich their grossly overpaid bureaucrats with tax dollars from struggling American families is coming to an end.
“Taxpayer funds are a privilege, and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege.”
The Trump administration has also paused some funding for universities including Columbia, Princeton, Cornell, Northwestern and Brown over the campus protests.
But protesters, including some Jewish groups, say their criticism of Israel’s military actions in Gaza is wrongly associated with antisemitism.
Mr Garber said the institution would continue to fight hate and fully comply with anti-discrimination laws.
Image: A small encampment in support of Palestinians at the Harvard campus in April 2024. Pic: Reuters
The American Council on Education, a non-profit organisation with more than 1,600 member colleges and universities, supported the legal action by Harvard.
“It has been clear for weeks that the administration’s actions violated due process and the rule of law. We applaud Harvard for taking this step.”
Donald Trump has said he will sue the BBC for between $1bn and $5bn over the editing of his speech on Panorama.
The US president confirmed he would be taking legal action against the broadcaster while on Air Force One overnight on Saturday.
“We’ll sue them. We’ll sue them for anywhere between a billion (£792m) and five billion dollars (£3.79bn), probably sometime next week,” he told reporters.
“We have to do it, they’ve even admitted that they cheated. Not that they couldn’t have not done that. They cheated. They changed the words coming out of my mouth.”
Mr Trump then told reporters he would discuss the matter with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer over the weekend, and claimed “the people of the UK are very angry about what happened… because it shows the BBC is fake news”.
Separately, Mr Trump told GB News: “I’m not looking to get into lawsuits, but I think I have an obligation to do it.
“This was so egregious. If you don’t do it, you don’t stop it from happening again with other people.”
More on Bbc
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
11:02
BBC crisis: How did it happen?
The Daily Telegraph reported earlier this month that an internal memo raised concerns about the BBC’s editing of a speech made by Mr Trump on 6 January 2021, just before a mob rioted at the US Capitol building, on the news programme.
The concerns regard clips spliced together from sections of the president’s speech to make it appear he told supporters he was going to walk to the US Capitol with them to “fight like hell” in the documentary Trump: A Second Chance?, which was broadcast by the BBC the week before last year’s US election.
Following a backlash, both BBC director-general Tim Davie and BBC News chief executive Deborah Turness resigned from their roles.
‘No basis for defamation claim’
On Thursday, the broadcaster officially apologised to the president and added that it was an “error of judgement” and the programme will “not be broadcast again in this form on any BBC platforms”.
A spokesperson said that “the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited,” but they also added that “we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim”.
Earlier this week, Mr Trump’s lawyers threatened to sue the BBC for $1bn unless it apologised, retracted the clip, and compensated him.
Image: The US president said he would sue the broadcaster for between $1bn and $5bn. File pic: PA
Legal challenges
But legal experts have said that Mr Trump would face challenges taking the case to court in the UK or the US.
The deadline to bring the case to UK courts, where defamation damages rarely exceed £100,000 ($132,000), has already expired because the documentary aired in October 2024, which is more than one year.
Also because the documentary was not shown in the US, it would be hard to show that Americans thought less of the president because of a programme they could not watch.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:05
Sky’s Katie Spencer on what BBC bosses told staff on call over Trump row
Newsnight allegations
The BBC has said it was looking into fresh allegations, published in The Telegraph, that its Newsnight show also selectively edited footage of the same speech in a report broadcast in June 2022.
A BBC spokesperson said: “The BBC holds itself to the highest editorial standards. This matter has been brought to our attention and we are now looking into it.”
Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has said she is ready to mend relations with Donald Trump after a high-profile row between the pair.
The former MAGA ally had said the US president was “coming after me hard” to prevent her efforts to release more files about Jeffrey Epstein.
But writing on X on Sunday, she said forgiveness was a “major part” of her Christian faith.
“I’m here to show how it’s possible to settle our differences and move forward as Americans,” she wrote. “That’s why I’m always willing to go on shows with different viewpoints.
“I truly believe in forgiveness and I am open to moving forward with the President.”
She said she’d received warnings about her safety and that “a hotbed of threats” were “being fuelled and egged on by the most powerful man in the world”.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:54
‘MAGA meltdown going on because of Epstein’
“As a woman, I take threats from men seriously,” Ms Greene added.
“I now have a small understanding of the fear and pressure the women, who are victims of Jeffrey Epstein and his cabal, must feel.”
The congresswoman said Mr Trump’s “aggression against me” – considering she was a staunch supporter of his policies – was “completely shocking to everyone”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
The fight began when a petition to vote on the full release of the Epstein files received enough signatures – including Ms Greene’s – to bring it to a vote in the House of Representatives.
Mr Trump rescinded his support for Ms Greene, dubbed her a “RINO” (Republican In Name Only), and suggested he could support a challenge against her.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:05
March 2025: Greene clashes with Sky correspondent
Ms Greene claimed text messages she sent to the president about the Epstein files had “sent him over the edge”.
She wrote on social media: “Of course he’s coming after me hard to make an example to scare all the other Republicans before next week’s vote to release the Epstein files.”
High-profile figures, including Mr Trump, have been referenced in some of the documents.
The White House has said the “selectively leaked emails” were an attempt to “create a fake narrative to smear President Trump”, who has consistently denied any involvement or knowledge about Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.
Mr Trump has called the Epstein files a “hoax” created by the Democrats to “deflect” from the US government shutdown.
Prison staff who leaked details about Ghislaine Maxwell’s favourable conditions in a minimum-security facility have been sacked, according to a lawyer for the disgraced British socialite.
Leah Saffian said employees at Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas were “terminated for improper, unauthorised access” to an email system which allows “inmates to communicate with the outside world”.
It comes after Maxwell‘s “privileged client-attorney email correspondence” was allegedly shared.
The co-conspirator of the late billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epsteinwas sentenced to 20 years in jail in 2022 for sex trafficking after recruiting young girls for her financier ex-boyfriend during the 1990s and early 2000s.
Image: Ghislaine Maxwell with Jeffrey Epstein. File pic: US Department of Justice
She was moved from a low-security facility in Tallahassee, Florida, to Federal Prison Camp Bryan in August, a week after she met deputy attorney general Todd Blanche and Maxwell’s lawyer David Oscar Markus.
Within days of arriving, Maxwell, 63, gushed in emails to her family and friends about her new surroundings.
The prison camp is an all-female institution where inmates convicted of non-violent or white-collar crimes sleep in dormitory-style quarters.
More on Ghislaine Maxwell
Related Topics:
She has reportedly had perks such as meals sent to her dormitory room, late-night workouts and permission to shower when other inmates are in bed, according to the Wall Street Journal.
“The food is legions better, the place is clean, the staff responsive and polite,” she wrote in an email seen by Sky’s US partner NBC News. The messages were obtained by the House Judiciary Committee.
Image: Maxwell is now serving her sentence at Federal Prison Camp Bryan in Texas. File pic: AP
‘Much happier here’
“I feel like I have dropped through Alice in Wonderland’s looking glass,” Maxwell wrote to a relative, adding, “I am much, much happier here and more importantly safe.”
She also said: “The institution is run in an orderly fashion, which makes for a safer, more comfortable environment for all people concerned, inmates and guards alike.”