Dodge Charger. Ford Lightning. Some historic car names are just begging to be brought back as new-age electric vehicles, but the best one has always been the Buick Electra – and now, it’s back. Meet the all-new Buick ELECTRA GS concept.

It’s hard to draw a direct line between this new-age concept, which made its debut earlier today in Shanghai, and the OG 1959 Buick Electra. Heck, that car would probably have more parts in common with a lunar rover than this new electric Electra … but as Michael Keaton’s Ray Kroc says in The Founder, “I needed the name.”

The new ELECTRA GS is big, bad, and definitely designed to feel like a chest-forward statement of intent. In fact, the official copy says that the concept draws inspiration from the mythical centaur, embodying both raw power and intelligence.

“The ELECTRA GS is more than a concept. It’s a design manifesto,” said Stuart Norris, Chief Design Officer at SAIC-GM and Vice President of GM China Design. “It’s a bold statement that Buick will continue its success in the electric era with sculptural dynamism, cutting-edge technology, and uncompromised sophistication.”

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Which, sure – but did I mention it’s big? (It’s so big, you guys).

Return of the big Buick

At 5,300 mm, the concept Buick is well over seventeen feet long, and it seems tall, too – those are 23″ (twenty-three inch) wheels that scale it down a bit, but it’s nearly as big as a Chevy Tahoe/GMC Yukon at 5,334 mm.

No technical specs are provided, indicating that this very much a styling exercise, but one could easily imagine the same high-powered Ultium underpinnings found in a physics-defying GMC Hummer EV buried below the ELECTRA GS’ curves and making it more than quick enough to live up to any hype generated by the GNX version GM is bound to roll out to SEMA in a year or two.

It’s what’s inside that counts

Inside, the big electric skateboard chassis enables a flat, expansive cabin that the company says is “transformed into a bespoke sanctuary.” The car features four individual captain’s chairs wrapped in premium materials and metallic accents to deliver first-class comfort. The driver’s view is uncluttered with simple instruments and a large HUD, while a 16.3-inch ultra-wide display caters to front-seat passengers (the designated DJs on any long road trip) with bunches of connectivity but, presumably, no Apple CarPlay.

Even so, it seems like a forward-looking, high-tech vision that caters more to Chinese than American sensibilities. “In today’s connected world, where design and technology transcend borders, our team is proud to be shaping a global vision from China’s perspective,” said Norris. “The ELECTRA GS is just the beginning.”

Buick has sold more than 10 million vehicles in China since its introduction to the market by SAIC-GM in 1998, and hopes that new concepts like ELECTRA GS will help it continue to succeed despite domestic competition.

SOURCE | IMAGES: GM.

The electric bike brand Tenways, known for its sleek and commuter-friendly e-bikes, is officially entering the cargo bike segment in the US with the launch of the Tenways Cargo One. The front-loading electric cargo bike takes on major brands like Urban Arrow while offering a lower-cost alternative for two-wheeled family transportation.

The new Tenways Cargo One marks a significant expansion for the brand as it joins the growing category of front-loading cargo e-bikes, often referred to by their Dutch name bakfiets. The proliferation of the Dutch word for these bikes is no accident – this style of e-bike is common on streets of major cities and smaller towns alike across the Netherlands, helping families transport several kids on a single bike. The front-loading design allows parents to keep a better eye on their passengers and makes it easier for kids to get in and out of their seats, not to mention keeping the center of gravity lower.

For that reason, front-loading cargo e-bikes are a popular choice in Europe, especially in bike-centric countries like the Netherlands. Now the Shenzhen-based e-bike maker Tenways is bringing that same convenience to the US.

Unlike most of Tenways’ e-bikes, which are shipped directly to consumers for at-home assembly, the Cargo One will be delivered fully assembled via local Tenways dealers. The company cites the bike’s size and complexity as the reason for this shift in logistics, ensuring that riders receive a properly built, ready-to-ride machine from day one. Unlike a typical e-bike that requires only the wheels and handlebars to be bolted in place at home, the Cargo One’s massive passenger/storage box and more complicated linked steering require more of an expert’s touch for assembly.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The Cargo One is equipped with an extra-large 800-liter front cargo box, designed for family transport, urban deliveries, or general heavy-duty hauling. Lighting is integrated throughout, including “EV-style” sidelights and standard front and rear LED lights, making the bike visible and safe in low-light conditions. A wide double kickstand allows for stable parking even when fully loaded.

Under the hood, the Cargo One features a Bafang mid-drive motor powered by a 960Wh portable battery. Tenways estimates a range of up to 90 km (56 miles) per charge. The drivetrain includes a Gates CDX carbon belt paired with an Enviolo stepless shifting hub, a combination prized for its low maintenance and smooth, intuitive operation.

Braking is handled by hydraulic disc brakes, and the bike is built to accommodate riders between 165 to 196 cm (5’5″ and 6’5″). With a top speed of 32 km/h (20 mph) and a total weight of 56 kg (123 lbs), the Cargo One balances performance and practicality for everyday utility cycling.

In terms of market positioning, Tenways is entering a space largely dominated by high-end European brands such as Urban Arrow and Riese & Müller. These brands have set the benchmark for quality and ride experience in the front-loader segment, but their models typically start at prices well above US $6,000, often pushing past $8,000.

At $5,499, the Tenways Cargo One offers a more accessible entry point for those looking to experience the utility and lifestyle of front-loading cargo e-bikes without reaching into luxury-tier pricing.

With the Cargo One, Tenways is signaling a serious commitment to the growing demand for family- and utility-focused electric bikes. As more U.S. cities invest in bike infrastructure and residents look for alternatives to car ownership, front-loading cargo e-bikes are gaining traction as a practical and environmentally friendly transportation solution.

Electrek’s Take

I’m all aboard this train! Cargo e-bikes are force multipliers in the two-wheeled industry, and these are the true SUVs of the cargo e-bike world. Front-loading cargo e-bikes like the Cargo One have a setup that allows for greater cargo capacity and stability.

We’ve already seen how this makes them a favorite in Europe among parents, small business owners, and urban dwellers who are replacing car trips with e-bike rides. While rear-loading cargo bikes also have their fans, front-loaders offer better visibility of your cargo – whether that’s groceries, kids, or gear – and a lower center of gravity. Front-loaders aren’t non-existent in the US. I see them occasionally in the US, but rear-loading cargo bikes are much more common due to their lower cost and smaller size.

At $5.5k, this is still a hefty chunk of change, but at least it’s a lot nicer than $8k. That difference might just help open up this market further for families that are ready to make the jump. I’m not under any illusion that Tenways is going to see huge sales on a bike like this in the US, at least not at first. But accessibility is the first battle. Once Americans have options, maybe then we can convince them to use those options.

Tesla’s earnings report dropped today, and news isn’t great. But instead of recognizing his failures that have led to Tesla’s downturn, CEO Elon Musk lashed out with conspiracy theories while also hypocritically failing to acknowledge that his company was only profitable this quarter due to regulatory credits.

The numbers are in on Tesla’s dismal quarter, with sales, profits and margins tanking significantly for the company despite a rising global EV market.

You’d expect a drop in car sales to be top of mind for a car company, but instead of talking about this, CEO Elon Musk opened the call by talking about his ineffective advisory role to a former reality TV host.

Musk is heading up the self-styled “Department of Government Efficiency,” an advisory group that is focused on reducing redundancy in government. The office is not an actual government department and has a redundant mission to the Government Accountability Office, which is an actual government department focused on reducing government waste.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Musk originally claimed that the department would be able to save $2 trillion for the US government, which is actually impossible because federal discretionary spending is $1.7 trillion, which is a (gets out abacus) smaller number than $2 trillion.

He has, of course, failed at this task that anyone with any level of competence would have known was impossible before setting it out for themselves, and now projects that the department will save $150 billion next year, less than a tenth of his original estimate. But even that projection is likely an overstatement, given that most of the supposed savings that DOGE has found are not actual savings at all.

On top of this, the US government’s deficit has grown to the second-highest level on record – with the first happening in 2020, the last time Mr. Trump squatted in the White House. Which means the government isn’t saving money, it is in fact borrowing and spending more of it than ever before.

So, Musk’s tenure in the advisory board has been an unmitigated failure by any realistic account.

But if you listened to Tesla’s call, you wouldn’t have known this, as Musk was quite boastful of his efforts – starting a Tesla conference call with an irrelevant rant about his fake government department, instead of with Tesla business.

He claimed that he has made “a lot of progress in addressing waste and fraud” and that the job is “mostly done,” which is not correct by his own metrics. Musk stated that his purpose is “trying to bring in the insane deficit that is leading our country, the United States, to destruction,” and as we covered above, that deficit has only increased.

But he also went on to spew some rather insane conspiracy theories about the reasons behind his company’s recent failures, all of which of course put the blame on someone else, rather than himself. The buck stops anywhere but here, I guess.

His primary assertion was that the “blowback from the time I’ve been spending in government” (which, again, is an advisory role, not an actual government position) has come mainly from protesters that were “receiving fraudulent money” and are now angry that the government money spigot has been turned off.

Which, of course, he’s provided no evidence for… and he’s provided no evidence for it because it’s false.

Besides, that’s not how protests work. But incorrect claims that protests do work that way are often used by opponents of free speech, with the motivation of putting a chilling effect public participation. Fitting behavior for an enemy of the First Amendment like Elon Musk.

Meanwhile, this assertion also comes from a person who tried and failed to bribe voters to win an election. Perhaps his admiration of Tesla protesters is aspirational – he wishes his ideas were good enough to inspire that sort of grassroots political effort that money, demonstrably, cannot buy.

But this hypocrisy extends beyond Musk’s hatred of free expression, and strikes at the heart of the business he is the titular leader of, Tesla, the organization that has made him into the richest man in the world. Because not only is it not true that Tesla protests are driven by his ineffective government actions (they are, in fact, driven by him doing Nazi stuff all the time), it’s also objectively true that Musk’s companies are a large recipient of government money.

And that’s particularly relevant today, to the very earnings call where Musk made his ridiculous assertion, because in Q1 2025, Tesla only turned a profit due to government credits. Without them, it would have lost money.

Tesla only profitable in Q1 due to regulatory credits

Per today’s earnings report, Tesla earned $595 million in regulatory credits in Q1. But its total net income for the quarter was $409 million.

This means that without those regulatory credits, Tesla would have posted a -$189 million loss in Q1. It was saved not just by credit sales, but credit sales which increased year over year – in the year-ago quarter, Tesla made $442 million in regulatory credits, despite having higher sales in Q1 2024 than in Q1 2025. So not only were credits higher, but credits per vehicle were higher.

This is a common feature of Tesla earnings, and we even said in our earnings preview that we expected it. While Tesla had a bad quarter, nobody expected it to become actually unprofitable, because there was always the possibility of increasing regulatory credit sales to eke out a profitable quarter.

And this has been the case many times in Tesla’s past, as well. In earlier times, Tesla’s first few profitable quarters were decried by the company’s opponents as an accounting trick, suggesting that regulatory credit sales weren’t “real” profits, and that the cars should have to stand on their own.

This is a silly thing to say – businesses do business in the environment that exists, and every business has an incentive structure that includes subsidies and externalities. If we were to selectively write off certain profits for certain businesses, we could make a tortured case that any business isn’t profitable.

Plus, these opponents didn’t extend the same treatment to the oil industry, which is subsidized to the tune of $760 billion per year in the US alone in unpriced externalities, yet that is somehow never mentioned during their earnings calls.

Musk has even claimed, probably correctly, that if all subsidies were eliminated both for EVs and for oil & gas, that EVs would come out ahead compared to the status quo (more recently, Musk has become one of the biggest funders of anti-EV forces, allying himself with a bought-and-paid oil stooge who is giving even more preferential treatment to the oil industry).

But, setting aside the debate over whether credits are valid profits (they are), for years now we’ve been well beyond Tesla’s reliance on credits. The company has produced significant profits, regardless of credit sales, for some time now.

At least, until today. That’s no longer true – Tesla did rely on credits to become profitable in Q1. And Musk starting the call with a ridiculous rant about government handouts not only shows his hypocrisy and projection on this matter, but his detachment from reality itself. He is, truly, too stuck in the impenetrable echo chamber of his self-congratulating twitter feed to realize what an embarrassment he’s being in public – to the point of inventing shadow enemies to explain the very real, very simple explanation that people aren’t buying his company’s cars because he sucks so much.

Charge your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*