Protesters who disrupted Anzac Day commemorations in Australia have been branded “a disgrace”, as ceremonies take place across the world.
Anti-indigenous rights protestors heckled and booed at two ceremonies paying tribute to Australianand New Zealand soldiers who lost their lives in conflicts.
Their actions have been labelled an act of “low cowardice” by the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, following the disruption at dawn-lit services in Perth and Melbourne on Friday.
Anzac Day is held every year on 25 April and commemorates when troops of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) landed on the beaches of Gallipoli in northwest Turkey in 1915.
Today, it remembers the contribution of all Australian and New Zealand forces. It is considered Australia’s most unifying national holiday.
Image: Service men and women take part in an Anzac day ceremony in Melbourne. Pic: Ye Myo Khant/SOPA Images/Shutterstock
In Melbourne, a group of hecklers, including a self-described Neo-Nazi, jeered at a dawn service at the Shrine of Remembrance where 50,000 people had gathered.
Meanwhile, a man yelled briefly during a service at Kings Park in Perth before the assembled crowd of 25,000 people persuaded him to stay silent, a police statement said.
The disruptions were triggered by the so-called Welcome to Country ceremonies, which are held at the beginning of many Australian public events. During the ceremonies, indigenous leaders welcome visitors to their traditional lands.
Hecklers in Melbourne responded “this is our country” and “we don’t have to be welcomed,” echoing a slogan of the minor Australian political party, Trumpet of Patriots.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
It comes at a time of heightened political tensions in the country ahead of the general election on 3 May, in which indigenous rights are a campaign issue.
Mr Albanese called the protestors a “disgrace” and said there’s “no place in Australia for what occurred”.
“The disruption of Anzac Day is beyond contempt, and the people responsible must face the full force of the law,” he said.
“This was an act of low cowardice on a day when we honour courage and sacrifice.”
The Melbourne-based First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria, an Indigenous advocacy group, added in a statement that it “strongly condemns the racist attack during the Welcome to Country” in Melbourne.
Royals attend ceremonies
Image: The Princess Royal lays a wreath at a ceremony at Anzac Cove in Gallipoli. Pic: PA
In the UK, the King released a statement paying tribute to Australian and New Zealand forces both former and current. He has previously attended dawn ceremonies at Gallipoli in 2005 and 2015.
He said: “Through the generations, you have continued to enact the indomitable spirit of Anzac- forged in terrible conflict and preserved in peace – of courage, mateship and sacrifice.”
Meanwhile, the Princess Royal attended a ceremony at Anzac Cove in Gallipoli, where she paid tribute to the soldiers’ “bravery, courage and sacrifice”.
Princess Anne laid a wreath for the fallen soldiers of several nationalities and met with New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon.
Image: The Duchess of Edinburgh at a dawn service at Hyde Park Corner, London. Pic: PA
The Duchess of Edinburgh also took part in the annual Anzac Day commemorations in London’s Hyde Park Corner and was joined by Australians and New Zealanders for a dawn service.
She also attended a wreath-laying ceremony at the Cenotaph at a service of thanksgiving at Westminster Abbey.
The Donald Trump peace plan is nothing of the sort. It takes Russian demands and presents them as peace proposals, in what is effectively for Ukraine a surrender ultimatum.
If accepted, it would reward armed aggression. The principle, sacrosanct since the Second World War, for obvious and very good reasons, that even de facto borders cannot be changed by force, will have been trampled on at the behest of the leader of the free world.
The Kremlin will have imposed terms via negotiators on a country it has violated, and whose people its troops have butchered, massacred and raped. It is without doubt the biggest crisis in Trans-Atlantic relations since the war began, if not since the inception of NATO.
The question now is: are Europe’s leaders up to meeting the daunting challenges that will follow. On past form, we cannot be sure.
Image: Vladimir Putin, President of Russia. Pic: Sputnik/Gavriil Grigorov via Reuters
The plan proposes the following:
• Land seized by Vladimir Putin’s unwarranted and unprovoked invasion would be ceded by Kyiv.
• Territory his forces have fought but failed to take with colossal loss of life will be thrown into the bargain for good measure.
• Ukraine will be barred from NATO, from having long-range weapons, from hosting foreign troops, from allowing foreign diplomatic planes to land, and its military neutered, reduced in size by more than half.
Image: Donald Trump meeting Vladimir Putin in Alaska in August, File pic: Reuters
And most worryingly for Western leaders, the plan proposes NATO and Russia negotiate with America acting as mediator.
Lest we forget, America is meant to be the strongest partner in NATO, not an outside arbitrator. In one clause, Mr Trump’s lack of commitment to the Western alliance is laid bare in chilling clarity.
And even for all that, the plan will not bring peace. Mr Putin has made it abundantly clear he wants all of Ukraine.
He has a proven track record of retiring, rallying his forces, then returning for more. Reward a bully as they say, and he will only come back for more. Why wouldn’t he, if he is handed the fortress cities of Donetsk and a clear run over open tank country to Kyiv in a few years?
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:29
US draft Russia peace plan
Since the beginning of Trump’s presidency, Europe has tried to keep the maverick president onside when his true sympathies have repeatedly reverted to Moscow.
It has been a demeaning and sycophantic spectacle, NATO’s secretary general stooping even to calling the US president ‘Daddy’. And it hasn’t worked. It may have made matters worse.
Image: A choir sing in front of an apartment building destroyed in a Russian missile strike in Ternopil, Ukraine. Pic: Reuters
The parade of world leaders trooping through Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, lavishing praise on his Gaza ceasefire plan, only encouraged him to believe he is capable of solving the world’s most complex conflicts with the minimum of effort.
The Gaza plan is mired in deepening difficulty, and it never came near addressing the underlying causes of the war.
Most importantly, principles the West has held inviolable for eight decades cannot be torn up for the sake of a quick and uncertain peace.
With a partner as unreliable, the challenge to Europe cannot be clearer.
In the words of one former Baltic foreign minister: “There is a glaringly obvious message for Europe in the 28-point plan: This is the end of the end.
“We have been told repeatedly and unambiguously that Ukraine’s security, and therefore Europe’s security, will be Europe’s responsibility. And now it is. Entirely.”
If Europe does not step up to the plate and guarantee Ukraine’s security in the face of this American betrayal, we could all pay the consequences.
“Terrible”, “weird”, “peculiar” and “baffling” – some of the adjectives being levelled by observers at the Donald Trump administration’s peace plan for Ukraine.
The 28-point proposal was cooked up between Trump negotiator Steve Witkoff and Kremlin official Kirill Dmitriev without European and Ukrainian involvement.
It effectively dresses up Russian demands as a peace proposal. Demands first made by Russia at the high watermark of its invasion in 2022, before defeats forced it to retreat from much of Ukraine.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:38
Ukrainian support for peace plan ‘very much in doubt’
The suspicion is Mr Witkoff and Mr Dmitriev conspired together to choose this moment to put even more pressure on the Ukrainian president.
Perversely, though, it may help him.
There has been universal condemnation and outrage in Kyiv at the Witkoff-Dmitriev plan. Rivals have little choice but to rally around the wartime Ukrainian leader as he faces such unreasonable demands.
The genesis of this plan is unclear.
Was it born from Donald Trump’s overinflated belief in his peacemaking abilities? His overrated Gaza ceasefire plan attracted lavish praise from world leaders, but now seems mired in deepening difficulty.
The fear is Mr Trump’s team are finding ways to allow him to walk away from this conflict altogether, blaming Ukrainian intransigence for the failure of his diplomacy.
Mr Trump has already ended financial support for Ukraine, acting as an arms dealer instead, selling weapons to Europe to pass on to the invaded democracy.
If he were to take away military intelligence support too, Ukraine would be blind to the kind of attacks that in recent days have killed scores of civilians.
Europe and Ukraine cannot reject the plan entirely and risk alienating Mr Trump.
They will play for time and hope against all the evidence he can still be persuaded to desert the Kremlin and put pressure on Vladimir Putin to end the war, rather than force Ukraine to surrender instead.