The first 100 days of the administration of US President Donald Trump have deeply impacted the crypto industry, starting with his own memecoin and culminating in a Bitcoin reserve and a spate of blockchain policymaking.
Trump’s trade war with the entire world has had the largest short-term impact on crypto markets, as crypto prices have wavered amid macroeconomic worry and uncertainty. Higher prices on electronics mean Bitcoin (BTC) miners are finding it harder to break even, and de-dollarization concerns abound.
Still, crypto markets have shown some resilience and cause for optimism in the administration’s crypto-friendly policies. A number of pro-crypto leaders have been appointed to key government agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The crypto industry’s long-awaited regulatory framework is also imminent.
Trump’s first 100 days have seen remarkable changes for the crypto industry, and it appears that things are only getting started. Here’s a look at what’s happened so far.
Jan. 20 — Trump’s first 100 days kick off with a memecoin
On Jan. 20, while Trump was sworn into office in the rotunda of the Capitol Building, his family’s crypto investment firm, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), launched its second token sale of WLFI tokens.
Massive demand saw prices initially spike, though the true value of the tokens, if any, is yet to be determined, as WLFI is currently not transferable and cannot be traded on any exchanges.
The memecoin served as a kickoff for Trump’s crypto agenda, which has seen unprecedented support for the industry in Washington, DC, along with a slew of moral and ethical concerns among observers and lawmakers.
Jan. 20 — Pro-crypto leaders head up federal agencies on “day one”
The president of the US sets the tone for several federal regulators, including those overseeing crypto. Trump immediately set out to appoint a number of pro-crypto lawyers and businessmen to head up the SEC, the CFTC and other critical federal agencies.
Trump nominated businessman Paul Atkins to lead the SEC on “day one” of his presidency. Atkins would replace Gary Gensler, who was perceived by many in the crypto industry as an enemy to adoption and the industry’s progress.
Also on day one, Trump appointed businessman and crypto investor David Sacks as chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology — or the crypto and AI “czar.”
In a press conference, Trump announced a $500-billion private-led AI infrastructure investment called “Stargate.” The president claimed the project — led by ChatGPT creator OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle — would create some 10,000 American jobs.
Trump said the US needed to lead the world in AI innovation and keep development onshore. “China is a competitor, others are competitors. We want it to be in this country, and we’re making it available,” he said.
OpenAI claimed that the project would “not only support the re-industrialization of the United States but also provide a strategic capability to protect the national security of America and its allies.”
Jan. 21 — Pardon for Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht
Trump announced on Truth Social that he had called the family of Silk Road 2.0 founder Ross Ulbricht after commuting his sentence.
After his arrest in 2013, Ulbricht was sentenced to life in prison in 2015 without the possibility of parole for his role in facilitating the trafficking of narcotics and other illicit substances.
Ulbricht’s case became a rallying point for libertarian movements and prison reform advocates alike. Libertarian-minded crypto advocates supported Ulbricht, as his platform was one of the first places people could actually spend Bitcoin.
Crypto advocates supported Ulbricht, with many believing he did nothing wrong. Source: The Bitcoin Historian
Jan. 23 — Ban on digital dollar, establishing a crypto working group
With an executive order, Trump established an internal working group to focus on making the US “the world capital in crypto.” The order also prohibited “the establishment, issuance, circulation, and use” of a US central bank digital currency (CBDC).
CBDCs are a contentious issue in the crypto community, with many privacy activists claiming that they are another form of state surveillance and government control. Enthusiasm over their creation from central bankers has further set the more libertarian-minded crypto community against their creation.
Trump signing the executive order. Source: ABC News
The working group would kickstart the process for creating the forthcoming US Bitcoin and crypto reserves.
Feb. 1 — Trade war begins with tariffs on Mexico, China and Canada
One of the promises of the Trump campaign was to rectify the “bad deals” that the US had with many of its oldest allies and most important trading partners.
Just over a week after he was sworn into office, Trump announced sweeping tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, citing border security concerns and the supposed proliferation of cross-border trade of fentanyl from those countries.
The same day, Canada announced retaliatory measures. On Feb. 3, Mexico promised to step up security of its northern border, responding to American requests for increased patrols. This led Trump to reverse initial tariff plans on both countries.
The unexpected hostile tariffs from a close partner and ally sent stock and crypto prices tumbling. They marked the beginning of the macroeconomic uncertainty that has come to characterize the early days of the Trump administration.
Feb. 12 — Vinnik-Foegel prisoner swap with Russia
Alexander Vinnik, the convicted money launderer who funneled Bitcoin stolen in the infamous Mt. Gox hack through his crypto exchange BTC-e, returned to his home country of Russia.
Vinnik pled guilty to money laundering conspiracy charges in 2024. BTC-e processed more than $9 billion in transactions and had over 1 million users worldwide, many of whom were in the US.
Vinnik was exchanged for American schoolteacher Marc Fogel, who was teaching at the Anglo-American School of Moscow and had been in a Russian jail since 2021 after being arrested for illegal possession of cannabis.
Feb. 18 — Bankman-Fried makes veiled plea for release
In an interview with The New York Sun, the former CEO of now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, addressed his controversial political contributions, saying the Republican Party was always “far more reasonable.”
Bankman-Fried, or SBF, made widely publicized contributions to the Democratic Party as he purportedly tried to influence democratic policymakers’ approach to the digital asset industry. It later became known that SBF was playing both sides of the aisle, donating significant funds to Republicans, though the exact amount remains unknown.
In the interview, SBF likened his position to that of Trump, claiming that he’d been unfairly treated by the criminal justice system. SBF called into question the conduct of the federal judge overseeing his trial, Judge Lewis Kaplan. “I know President Trump had a lot of frustrations with Judge Kaplan. I certainly did as well.”
Observers saw the interview as an attempt to elicit a pardon from Trump. Roger Ver, an early Bitcoin advocate facing criminal tax evasion charges, has made an outright appeal.
March 7 — Trump establishes Bitcoin reserve and crypto stockpile
On March 7, the 46th day of Trump’s presidency, he signed an executive order establishing a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.” Trump made big promises about crypto adoption on the campaign trail, including the possibility of a long-sought-after Bitcoin reserve.
The US reserve, however, would fall short of expectations among Bitcoin maximalists. Rather than create a concrete plan for the US government to purchase and hold Bitcoin, it merely created a single reserve to pool all Bitcoin the government had seized during criminal proceedings.
While the order does state that the government may purchase additional Bitcoin, it must do so in a budget-neutral fashion.
In tandem with the Bitcoin reserve, Trump also established a US Digital Asset Stockpile containing other cryptocurrencies such as Ether (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP (XRP) and Cardano (ADA).
March 7 — White House Crypto Summit
Leaders of the crypto industry descended on Washington for a meeting at the White House to discuss a wide range of topics related to crypto regulation and the development of the industry in the US.
Attendees included Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and “crypto czar” David Sacks.
While some attendees, including Chainlink co-founder Sergey Nazarov, were optimistic about the event’s focus on strengthening the US crypto industry, some crypto luminaries who were not on the list were less impressed.
Cardano and IOHK co-founder Charles Hoskinson, who did not attend the event, noted in a video stream that real change — i.e., legislation — must be made in Congress.
“Everybody focuses on the White House because it’s simple and easy to do so. […] And as much as we, as an industry, want this to be a short process, it’s going to be a long and methodical process,” Hoskinson said.
WLFI expanded its offerings in March with the soft launch of its stablecoin USD1. The coin, “100% backed by short-term US government treasuries, US dollar deposits, and other cash equivalents,” launched on the Ethereum and BNB Chain networks.
US lawmakers subsequently called for an ethics probe into WLFI and cited the president’s ability to influence stablecoin policy as a major conflict of interest with the project.
Markets saw a spate of red across the board following the order, and many economic observers raised concerns over a looming recession. Crypto miners based in the US were further squeezed as their operation costs, namely for buying new mining rigs, increased significantly.
Former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci told Cointelegraph, “I would say that he’s had the worst 95 days in modern presidential history. The markets recovered a little, but we’ve got $9 trillion taken from the stock market. You had a growing economy that’s now heading into a medium-sized recession, possibly a steep recession.”
He said that Trump declared a trade war “without any real weaponry” and subsequently lied about progress when the president claimed China was attempting to negotiate.
“The lies are ok — everyone accepts that he’s a congenital liar […] but when you’re declaring war on people and then you’re lying, it’s really bad.”
April 25 — $300,000-per-plate memecoin dinner raises call for impeachment
Top Trump memecoin holders were reportedly offered an opportunity to have dinner with the president, sparking renewed concerns over his crypto project and prompting one US lawmaker to support impeachment.
At a town hall meeting in his home state of Georgia, Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff said he “strongly” supports impeachment. “When the sitting president of the United States is selling access for what are effectively payments directly to him, there is no question that that rises to the level of an impeachable offense,” he said.
TRUMP holders can register to have dinner with the President. Source: gettrumpmemes.com
Rumors on social media stated that $300,000 would grant tokenholders an audience with the president, a claim the Trump administration later denied.
Trump’s first 100 days could jeopardize change
The first 100 days of Trump’s presidency have broughtunprecedented change to the crypto industry. Simultaneously, they have opened it up to increased criticism and controversy as the president’s personal ties with blockchain projects raise ethical questions.
These controversies may well jeopardize the industry’s efforts to effect change in Congress, according to Scaramucci, who said, “Trump has so inflamed everything that he’s made it even hard for [stablecoin legislation] to happen.”
The STABLE Act, which aims to provide guardrails for stablecoin issuance in the US, was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 26 and passed a committee vote on April 3, with prominent Democrats dissenting. The bill will soon head to the floor for a general vote before going to the Senate.
The day after Sir Keir Starmer said he wanted Angela Rayner back in the cabinet, she showed Labour MPs what they’ve been missing.
The former deputy prime minister delighted Labour backbenchers with a powerful Commons speech defending her workers’ rights legislation on Monday evening.
With the House of Lords locked in a battle of parliamentary “ping pong” with MPs, she told ministers: “Now is not the time to blink or buckle.”
Her very public intervention came amid claims that her next move has the Labour Party on tenterhooks and that she’s the favourite to succeed Sir Keir if she wants the job.
And her speech, delivered from notes and clearly meticulously prepared, appeared to send a message to Labour MPs: I’m here to make a comeback.
The government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill was championed by Ms Rayner when she was deputy PM, in the face of bitter opposition from the Conservatives.
More on Angela Rayner
Related Topics:
In a bid to end the deadlock with the Lords, ministers have backed down on unfair dismissal protection from day one, proposing a compromise of six months.
Backing the compromise, brokered with the TUC, Ms Rayner said: “I know ministers had faced difficult decisions and difficult discussions with the employers and worker representatives.
“But I strongly believe that the work that has been done has been necessary, and we should be able to move forward now.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:19
Could Rayner come back?
Attacking the upper chamber for delaying the legislation, she said: “There is now no more time to waste.
“Vested interests worked with the Tories and the Lib Dems and, cheered on by Reform and backed by the Greens, to resist the manifesto on which we were elected.
“And now there can be no excuses. We have a mandate for a new deal for working people, and we must, and we will deliver it.
And she concluded: “It has been a battle to pass this bill, but progress is always a struggle that we fought for. Its passage will be a historic achievement for this Labour government.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:25
Angela Rayner’s resignation speech
“It will benefit working people now and into the future. Now is not the time to blink or buckle. Let’s not waste a minute more. It’s time to deliver.”
It was the sort of fighting talk and defiance of the government’s opponents that will have cheered up Labour MPs and boosted her hopes of a comeback and even a leadership bid.
It came as speculation over Sir Keir’s future grows more frenzied by the day, with claims that even some of his own supporters have begun the hunt for his successor.
The thinktank that ran his leadership campaign in 2020, Labour Together, is reported to be canvassing party members on candidates to replace him.
Image: Wes Streeting and Angela Rayner.
There was even a claim last week that allies of Wes Streeting were sounding out Labour MPs about a pact with Ms Rayner and a joint ticket for the leadership.
The health secretary dismissed that claim as a “silly season story”, while a Rayner ally said: “There’s no vacancy and there’s no pact”. They added that she will not “be played like a pawn”.
Mr Streeting did, however, start speculation himself when he said in his Labour conference speech: “We want her back. We need her back.”
Fuelling more speculation, Sir Keir went further than he had previously on Sunday, when he was asked in an Observer interview if he missed her and replied; “Yes, of course I do. I was really sad that we lost her.”
And asked if she would return to the cabinet, the prime minister said: “Yes. She’s hugely talented.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:42
‘Angela Rayner, this achievement is yours.’
Sir Keir also described Ms Rayner, who left school at 16 without any qualifications, as “the best social mobility story this country has ever seen”.
But a swift return to the cabinet would be hugely controversial, because the PM’s ethic adviser, Sir Laurie Magner, ruled that she breached the ministerial code by underpaying stamp duty when she bought a flat.
But she has been linked to speculation about possible efforts to remove Sir Keir if – as predicted – Labour performs badly in the Scottish, Welsh and local elections next May.
Her supporters also claim she will eventually be cleared by HMRC over her stamp duty breach, clearing the way for her to come back.
And her latest speech – combative, defiant and yet loyal – will have boosted her hopes, and reminded Labour MPs what they’ve missed since she quit in September.
The Sandie Peggie case has been such a high-profile story because it gets to the heart of the debate about trans rights versus women’s rights, which has been so fraught in recent years – especially in Scotland.
While the Supreme Court ruled in April that the Equality Act referred to a person’s biological sex – with major ramifications over who can use female-protected spaces – we are still waiting for long-delayed government guidance on how this should be applied. We are told it’s due “as soon as possible”.
Government minister Dame Diana Johnson brightly told Darren McCaffrey on Sky’s Politics Hub on Monday that organisations “just need to get on with it – the law is clear”.
But with so many organisations waiting for government guidance before changing policy – that’s clearly not the case.
Campaigners have criticised the Peggie tribunal for not following the Supreme Court’s lead more directly. The tribunal didn’t find that it was wrong to let Dr Upton use the female changing rooms – just that action should have been taken after Ms Peggie complained.
Her lawyers say that is hugely problematic, as it puts the onus on a woman to complain.
More on Scotland
Related Topics:
The political reaction has been swift. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has long been outspoken on this issue, and she has posted a typically punchy statement in response to the case.
“It’s ridiculous it took two years to reach a verdict that was so obvious from the start,” she wrote on X.
“This entire episode is indicative of a system wasting time and taxpayers’ money to please a small cabal of activists.”
Image: Nurse Sandie Peggie, pictured outside the Edinburgh Tribunals Service after she won a claim for harassment. Pic: PA
But it’s not just the Tories. Scottish Labour MP Joani Reid described Ms Peggie’s treatment as “a disgrace…enabled by a warped NHS culture and fostered by a Scottish government that refused to listen to women’s concerns”.
Of course, the SNP have always been hugely supportive of trans rights, attempting to pass gender recognition laws which would have made it much easier for people to self-ID. That legislation was blocked by the UK Supreme Court.
John Swinney gave a carefully worded response when asked about the issue on Monday, saying “it’s important to take time to consider the judgment” with no further comment on the questions raised by the case.
Sir Keir Starmer, too, has long been dogged by criticism over the lack of clarity in some of his answers to the question “what is a woman”, although he has sought to be more definite in recent years.
Anna Turley, the chair of the Labour Party, said on Monday that it’s more important to get the Supreme Court guidance right than to get it out quickly.
But Monday’s judgment shows the urgent importance of both.
With Do Kwon scheduled to be sentenced on Thursday after pleading guilty to two felony counts, a US federal judge is asking prosecutors and defense attorneys about the Terraform Labs co-founder’s legal troubles in his native country, South Korea, and Montenegro.
In a Monday filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Paul Engelmayer asked Kwon’s lawyers and attorneys representing the US government about the charges and “maximum and minimum sentences” the Terraform co-founder could face in South Korea, where he is expected to be extradited after potentially serving prison time in the United States.
Kwon pleaded guilty to two counts of wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud in August and is scheduled to be sentenced by Engelmayer on Thursday.
In addition to the judge’s questions on Kwon potentially serving time in South Korea, he asked whether there was agreement that “none of Mr. Kwon’s time in custody in Montenegro” — where he served a four-month sentence for using falsified travel documents and fought extradition to the US for more than a year — would be credited to any potential US sentence.
Judge Engelmayer’s questions signaled concerns that, should the US grant extradition to South Korea to serve “the back half of his sentence,” the country’s authorities could release him early.
Kwon was one of the most prominent figures in the crypto and blockchain industry in 2022 before the collapse of the Terra ecosystem, which many experts agree contributed to a market crash that resulted in several companies declaring bankruptcy and significant losses to investors.
The sentencing recommendation from the US government said that Kwon had “caused losses that eclipsed those caused” by former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky and OneCoin’s Karl Sebastian Greenwood combined. All three men are serving multi-year sentences in federal prison.
Will Do Kwon serve time in South Korea?
The Terraform co-founder’s lawyers said that even if Engelmayer were to sentence Kwon to time served, he would “immediately reenter pretrial detention pending his criminal charges in South Korea,” and potentially face up to 40 years in the country, where he holds citizenship.
Thursday’s sentencing hearing could mark the beginning of the end of Kwon’s chapter in the 2022 collapse of Terraform. His whereabouts amid the crypto market downturn were not publicly known until he was arrested in Montenegro and held in custody to await extradition to the US, where he was indicted in March 2023 for his role at Terraform.
South Korean authorities issued an arrest warrant for Kwon in 2022, but have not had him in custody since the collapse of the Terra ecosystem. The country’s prosecutors applied to extradite Kwon from Montenegro simultaneously with the US, while they were pursuing similar cases against individuals tied to Terraform.