Juiced Bikes spent 15 years as a beloved e-bike brand building some of the most iconic and highest-performance electric bicycles in the US market. But financial troubles put the brand into a tailspin last year, ultimately culminating in bankruptcy and closure. The brand appeared to be a goner until two young e-bike entrepreneurs stepped up to try and salvage Juiced’s legacy in a deal whose details have never been revealed – until now.
I covered the apparent collapse of Juiced Bikes late last year, including watching the company’s assets eventually surface on an auction site seemingly run as a way to repay Juiced’s creditors.
The auction included everything from Juiced Bikes’ designs, patents, and other intellectual property (IP) to its wide assortment of e-bike inventory and spare parts, and even the company’s Sprinter delivery van. The submitters of the winning bid were revealed to be Levi Conlow and Robby Deziel, the free-spirited founders of the largest electric bicycle company in the US, Phoenix-based Lectric Ebikes. I reported on that revelation last month, but the rest of the story had remained a mystery.
I recently had the chance to talk to Lectric Ebikes’ CEO Levi Conlow about the rollercoaster ride of trying to buy Juiced Bikes, and what comes next in the long process of restoring the brand to its former glory.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
This is that story.
Lectric co-founders Robby Deziel (left) and Levi Conlow (right) sporting their new Juiced Bikes swag
Levi, Robby, and the entire team at Lectric Ebikes have long shown a penchant for giving back not just to the broader e-bike community, but also for taking a wholistic approach to philanthropy as a company. In the past I’ve covered how they give away millions of dollars each year, both in terms of free e-bikes and donations to worthy causes.
Considering that the concept of doing the right thing is firmly engrained in the Lectric DNA, this seemed to Levi as another chance to give back to the larger e-bike community.
“We saw it as an opportunity to once again show the industry that Lectric can do the right thing,” said Levi. “We always pride ourselves on doing the right thing. We saw this as an opportunity to buy Juiced, give it a pathway to continue on, put the necessary resources into it to make it successful, but also to help resolve all these customers that had just gotten burned.”
That was a major sore spot in Juiced’s larger fall from grace. Not only did the brand cease operations and leave its tens of thousands of riders without support, but hundreds of customers had already paid in full for pre-ordered electric bikes that were never delivered.
“Our plan was to get that inventory and send those bikes to the customers that had already paid, and then we’d begin fresh once those customers are taken care of,” Levi explained. “We could pause for a bit then and rebuild the brand.”
The auction for Juiced’s assets, both physical and IP, included hundreds of e-bikes that were sitting in US logistics warehouses, waiting to be shipped to customers who had already paid for them.
After placing the winning bid in the auction, Levi and Robby intended to ship those e-bikes out to their original owners as quickly as possible. But the pair immediately ran into the first of what would soon become an ever-growing pile of obstacles.
“So we win the winning bid for this auction. And after we win the auction, I called the agency that ran the process and I was like, ‘Hey, my name is Levi Conlow. I just won this bid, what’s the next step?!’ and they were like, ‘Well, now it’s up to the creditors and the seller to decide if your bid is acceptable,’ and I’m thinking, ‘What?! What do you mean? I thought that was the point of the auction.’”
As it turned out, the $1.2 million winning bid wasn’t high enough to satisfy the creditors. Juiced owed significantly more than that. So Levi brought in the rest of his team and his board, then went back and forth with the company running the sale until new terms were finally accepted, and a deal was made to buy Juiced for a higher figure to get everything in the auction.
Now that Lectric had bought up Juiced’s assets for a higher number which Juiced’s creditors could live with, the next step was to start moving out those bikes. That would be its own logistical problem and so Levi wanted to get to work on solving it right away.
“We wanted to make sure we could physically go pick up the inventory, even though we now owned it,” Levi continued. “So we reached out to the different warehouses where the inventory was stored and quickly the warehouses responded ‘No, they owe us this sum of money, so they have to pay it before the inventory can be picked up.’ And the amount of money in warehouse storage costs was ridiculous, because they had not been paying for warehousing for, well for some locations it seemed like years, so it was this massive balance. So the inventory at the warehouses wasn’t even worth the amount that the warehouses were owed.”
Despite the massive storage fee debts that Juiced had racked up, Levi was under the impression that he had bought and owned all that inventory after working out the deal with Juiced’s creditors. Unfortunately, he was then informed that the inventory had already been sold out from under him. “They told me, ‘Oh, so that inventory was already sold to some other company, it was kind of a supplier debt, and they took ownership over it.’ So at one point this inventory was sold to customers, then it was sold to me, and then it was sold to another company.”
I had already discovered that the Chinese-owned e-bike brand Velowave had begun selling what appeared to be brand-new Juiced Ebikes on its US website, and Levi confirmed that Velowave was, in fact, the other company that had snatched up the inventory that was mostly pre-sold to existing customers.
With that US-based inventory lost, the next goal for Levi and Robby was to hopefully get ahold of the inventory and spare parts that were left in Asia.
However, Levi soon discovered that the Asian suppliers were owed around twice as much as the US-based creditors. “These Asian suppliers, many of them were left out of millions and millions of dollars owed to them. That relationship between Juiced and its suppliers is so far gone that there is no pathway for us to get bikes and parts from them. The non-proprietary stuff like Shimano parts and Tektro, the wheels and parts like that, that stuff is pretty easy to get. But the proprietary parts like controllers and motors, those are relationships that have really been damaged by the amount of money that Juiced owed.”
The damage done by the trail of debt left in Juiced’s wake is a problem that Lectric is now wading through.
“That’s one of the biggest hurdles we have to overcome,” sighed Levi. “There are a couple of suppliers that overlap with Lectric’s supply chain or where their sister companies already work with Lectric. And Lectric’s checks always clear – we’ve never missed a payment, we always pay on time. So there are a couple suppliers that we’re going to be able to resolve with and be able to get some warranty parts, but something that it’s important for people to know and prepare for is that for the vast majority, unfortunately, we are not going to be able to remedy those relationships. That’s basically been most of the work I’ve been doing recently, is trying to repair those relationships.”
Now, Levi and Robby are working on a solution to make things right for the hundreds of Juiced customers who are left empty-handed, out thousands of dollars for their pre-order and with no e-bike to show for it. But even that work has been hampered by the slow process of physically taking over Juiced’s digital assets, including access to the company’s website and the sales info trapped inside of it.
“Even getting into a platform like Shopify to figure out which customers didn’t get paid and what is owed to certain customers, that’s basically one of our only options right now for Rob and I, is to figure out who hasn’t been paid, reach out to those customers and write them a check to reimburse them or maybe offer them an e-bike from Lectric’s lineup. But we can’t even get into Shopify yet because Shopify was also owed a ton of money, and we can’t get into the email list because the email list was owed a lot of money too. All of those things are resolved through the bankruptcy, but there’s a legal process of providing the proper documentation and reporting in order for us to get access to those things. So there’s a lot of work before I can even turn the website on and email my first customer. But that is priority #1 right now, is to get the website live and communicate with customers.”
From there, the next step will be rebuilding the high-performance e-bike lineup that Juiced spent years developing. As involved as Levi and Robby will be, they also still have to run North America’s largest e-bike company, Lectric Ebikes, and so Juiced will still need a dedicated team of its own. “The first real hire we’re going to make is probably to hire a product manager. With how long development will take, maybe we can get it done in 9-12 months, but that really requires someone dedicating their full focus on it. So our day one objective is to hire someone to start rebuilding the product portfolio from the ground up,” explained Levi, before offering to toss that massive undertaking my way. “Are you bored? Are you looking for more work, Micah?,” he laughed.
As awesome of a job as that would be, the mere 24 hours I get in a day don’t seem quite enough for me, and I can only imagine how daunting of a task that will be for someone coming in ready to throw their entire focus at it. But Levi sounds excited about the possibilities, even as he acknowledges the headwinds they will face.
The direction that the new Juiced e-bikes will go is still uncertain, but it sounds like the designs will remain true to the style and performance of e-bikes that helped Juiced build its massive fanbase over the last decade and a half.
“There’s an iconicness to bikes like the Scrambler, Scorpion, and Juiced’s products like that,” Levi reflected. “I think we need to carry forward that performance and platform, but some industrial design needs to happen there as well. For the most part, the things that made us like Juiced over the last 15 years as a community of riders, that stuff is going to carry over into the next 15 years. The high performance, the awesome torque and acceleration, it’s something special. And we ought to carry that on because that’s what people really loved about the brand in the first place, so it’d be foolish to lose that.”
As for the division between Lectric Ebikes and Juiced moving forward, Levi has clear intentions there. It appears that Juiced will remain a separate company from Lectric, even if it benefits from the relationships and the purchasing power that Lectric enjoys. “I’m really looking forward to this challenge,” Levi continued, “because I see an extremely clear pathway to making this successful. You know, Lectric is the #1 selling bike company here in North America, and I think that the expectation for how Rob and I should push ourselves is to try and get Juiced to #2.”
That clear pathway in Levi’s mind is based upon a tried and true formula that he and his Lectric co-founder Robby Deziel developed over the last six years of building Lectric Ebikes. “So how do you do that?” Levi asked himself. “You’ve got to have the world’s best performance, the best price point, and exceptional customer service. And those are things that we have a ton of experience with. We know exactly how those formulas work. And so we have very high aspirations for Juiced.”
That experience is going to be a major benefit to rebuilding Juiced Bikes. “On day one, Juiced will get the benefit of our economies of scale. Our shipping rates are 75% less than what Juiced was paying to ship to customers. I haven’t fully run the numbers yet, but maybe that one thing alone is enough to take Juiced from unprofitable to breaking even. And then if you look at Lectric’s rates for shipping containers or our optimization for how we run every aspect of our business, there’s a very clear path to Juiced not just being reborn, but being a good business, fundamentally.”
It sounds like Levi, Robby, and the rest of their team at Lectric Ebikes have their work cut out for them. It’s not something foreign to any of them, and now they have the benefit of years of experience doing this once before.
However, they must also forge ahead against the headwinds of tariff uncertainty and without the boost offered by a post-pandemic e-bike buying spree. If there was ever an e-bike brand whose iconic legacy was worth fighting for though, Juiced Bikes is it.
As a final note, I contacted Juiced Bikes’ founder and former CEO, Tora Harris, for comment on this story but did not receive a response.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
President Donald Trump‘s attack on solar and wind projects threatens to raise energy prices for consumers and undermine a stretched electric grid that’s already straining to meet rapidly growing demand, renewable energy executives warn.
Trump has long said wind power turbines are unattractive and endanger birds, and that solar installations take up too much land. This week, he said his administration will not approve solar and wind projects, the latest salvo in a campaign the president has waged against the renewable energy industry since taking office.
“We will not approve wind or farmer destroying Solar,” Trump posted on Truth Social Wednesday. “The days of stupidity are over in the USA!!!”
Trump’s statement this week seemed to confirm industry fears that the Interior Department will block federal permits for solar and wind projects. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum took control of all permit approvals last month in a move that the American Clean Power Association criticized as “obstruction,” calling it “unprecedented political review.”
The Interior Department blocking permits would slow the growth of the entire solar and wind industry, top executives at renewable developers Arevon, Avantus and Engie North America told CNBC.
Even solar and wind projects on private land may need approvals from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service if, for example, a waterway or animal species is affected, the executives told CNBC. The three power companies are among the top 10 renewable developers in the U.S., according to energy research firm Enverus.
The Interior Department “will not give preferential treatment to massive, unreliable projects that make no sense for the American people or that risk harming communities or the environment,” a spokesperson told CNBC when asked if new permits would be issued for solar and wind construction.
Choking off renewables will worsen a looming power supply shortage, harm the electric grid and lead to higher electricity prices for consumers, said Kevin Smith, CEO of Arevon, a solar and battery storage developer headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, that’s active in 17 states. Arevon operates five gigawatts of power equivalent to $10 billion of capital investment.
“I don’t think everybody realizes how big the crunch is going to be,” Smith said. “We’re making that crunch more and more difficult with these policy changes.”
Uncertainty hits investment
The red tape at the Interior Department and rising costs from Trump’s copper and steel tariffs have created market instability that makes planning difficult, the renewable executives said.
“We don’t want to sign contracts until we know what the playing field is,” said Cliff Graham, CEO of Avantus, a solar and battery storage developer headquartered in San Diego. Avantus has built three gigawatts of solar and storage across the desert Southwest.
“I can do whatever you want me to do and have a viable business, I just need the rules set and in place,” Graham said.
Engie North America, the U.S. arm of a global energy company based in Paris, is slashing its planned investment in the U.S. by 50% due to tariffs and regulatory uncertainty, said David Carroll, the chief renewables officer who leads the American subsidiary. Engie could cut its plans even more, he said.
Engie’s North American subsidiary, headquartered in Houston, will operate about 11 gigawatts of solar, battery storage and wind power by year end.
Multinationals like Engie have long viewed the U.S. as one of the most stable business environments in the world, Carroll said. But that assessment is changing in Engie’s boardroom and across the industry, he said.
“The stability of the U.S. business market is no longer really the gold standard,” Carroll said.
Rising costs
Arevon is seeing costs for solar and battery storage projects increase by as much as 30% due to the metal tariffs, said Smith, the CEO. Many renewable developers are renegotiating power prices with utilities to cover the sudden spike in costs because projects no longer pencil out financially, he said.
Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act ends two key tax credits for solar and wind projects in late 2027, making conditions even more challenging. The investment tax credit supported new renewable construction and the production credit boosted clean electricity generation.
Those tax credits were just passed on to consumers, Smith said. Their termination and the rising costs from tariffs will mean higher utility bills for families and businesses, he said.
The price that Avantus charges for solar power has roughly doubled to $60 per megawatt-hour as interest rates and tariffs have increased over the years, said CEO Graham. Prices will surge again to around $100 per megawatt-hour when the tax credits are gone, he said.
“The small manufacturers, small companies and mom and pops will see their electric bills go up, and it’ll start pushing the small entrepreneurs out of the industry or out of the marketplace,” Graham said.
Renewable projects that start construction by next July, a year after the One Big Beautiful Act became law, will still qualify for the tax credits. Arevon, Avantus and Engie are moving forward with projects currently under construction, but the outlook is less certain for projects later in the decade.
The U.S. will see a big downturn in new renewable power generation starting in the second half of 2026 through 2028 as new projects no longer qualify for tax credits, said Smith, the head of Arevon.
“The small- and medium-sized players that can’t take the financial risk, some of them will disappear,” Smith said. “You’re going to see less projects built in the sector.”
Artificial intelligence power crunch
Fewer renewable power plants could increase the risk of brownouts or blackouts, Smith said. Electricity demand is surging from the data centers that technology companies are building to train artificial intelligence systems. PJM Interconnection, the largest electrical grid in the U.S. that coordinates wholesale electricity in 13 states and the District of Columbia, has warned of tight power supplies because too little new generation is coming online.
Renewables are the power source that can most quickly meet demand, Smith at Arevon said. More than 90% of the power waiting to connect to the grid is solar, battery storage or wind, according to data from Enverus.
“The power requirement is largely going to be coming from the new energy sector or not at all,” so without it, “the grid becomes substantially hampered,” Smith said.
Trump is prioritizing oil, gas and nuclear power as “the most effective and reliable tools to power our country,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said.
“President Trump serves the American people who voted to implement his America First energy agenda – not solar and wind executives who are sad that Biden’s Green New Scam subsidies are ending,” Kelly said.
But new natural gas plants won’t come online for another five years due to supply issues, new nuclear power is a decade away and no new coal plants are on the drawing board.
Utilities may have to turn away data centers at some point because there isn’t enough surplus power to run them, and no one wants to risk blackouts at hospitals, schools and homes, Arevon’s Smith said. This would pressure the U.S. in its race against China to master AI, a Trump administration priority.
“The panic in the data center, AI world is probably not going to set in for another 12 months or so, when they start realizing that they can’t get the power they need in some of these areas where they’re planning to build data centers,” Smith said.
“Then we’ll see what happens,” said the University of Chicago MBA, who’s worked in the energy industry for 35 years. “There may be a reversal in policy to try and build whatever we can and get power onto the grid.”
Over the weekend, Tesla began offering many Cybertruck trade-in estimated values above the original purchase price, apparently due to a glitch in its system.
Tesla offers online trade-in estimates for individuals considering purchasing a vehicle from them.
Over the last few days, Cybertruck owners who submitted their vehicles through the system were surprised to see Tesla offering extremely high valuations on the vehicle, often above what they originally paid for the electric truck.
Here are a few examples:
Advertisement – scroll for more content
$79,200 for a 2025 Cybertruck AWD with 18,000 miles. Since this is a 2025 model year, it was eligible for the tax credit and Tesla is offering the same price as new without incentive.
Here Tesla offered $118,800 for a 2024 Cybertruck ‘Cyberbeast’ tri-motor with 21,000 miles.
In this example, Tesla offers $11,000 more than the owner originally paid for a 2024 Cybertruck.
So, trade in the Foundation Series Cybertruck AWD for $11k more than I paid for it originally, re-buy an AWD with FSD for $79,490 after the tax credit.
I’d lose free supercharging for life, Cyberwheels, and white interior.
The trade-in estimates made no sense. Tesla has been known to offer more attractive estimates online and then come lower with the official final offer, but this is on a whole different level.
Some speculated that Tesla’s trade-in estimate system was malfunctioning, while others thought Tesla was indirectly recalling early Cybertrucks.
It appears to be the former.
Some Tesla Cybertruck owners who tried to go through a new order with their Cybertruck as a trade-in were told by Tesla advisors that the system was “glitching” and they would not be honoring those prices.
Tesla told buyers that it would be refunding its usually “non-refundable” order fee.
Electrek’s Take
That’s a weird glitch. I assume that it was trying to change how the trade-in value would be estimated and the new math didn’t work for the Cybertruck for whatever reason.
It’s the only thing that makes sense to me.
The Cybertruck’s value is already quite weird due to the fact that Tesla still has new vehicles made in 2024, which are not eligible for the tax credit incentive, while the new ones made in 2025 are eligible.
There’s also the Foundation Series, which bundles many features for a $20,000 higher price.
All these things affect the value and can make it hard to compare with new Cybertrucks offered with 0% interest.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Like a 90s “gifted” kid that was supposed to be a lot of things, the electric Jeep Wagoneer S never really found its place — but when dealers started discounting the Jeep brands forward-looking flagship by nearly $25,000 back in June, I wrote that it might be time to give the go-fast Wagoneer S a second look.
Whether we’re talking about Mercedes-Benz, Cerberus, Fiat, or even Enzo Ferrari, outsiders have labeled Jeep as a potentially premium brand that could, “if managed properly,” command luxury-level prices all over the globe. That hasn’t happened, and Stellantis is just the latest in a long line of companies to sink massive capital into the brand only to realize that people will not, in fact, spend Mercedes money on a Jeep.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
That said, the Jeep Wagoneer S is not a bad car (and neither is its totally different, hideously massive, ICE-powered Wagoneer sibling, frankly). Built on the same Stellantis STLA Large vehicle platform that underpins the sporty Charger Daytona EVs, the confusingly-named Wagoneer S packs dual electric motors putting out almost 600 hp. That’s good enough to scoot the ‘ute 0 to 60 mph in a stomach-turning 3.5 seconds and enough, on paper, to convince Stellantis executives that they had developed a real, market-ready alternative to the Tesla Model Y.
With the wrong name and a sky-high starting price of $66,995 (not including the $1,795 destination fee), however, that demand didn’t materialize, leaving the Wagoneer S languishing on dealer lots across the country.
That could be about to change, however, thanks to big discounts on Wagoneer S being reported at CDJR dealers in several states:
Jeff Belzer’s in Minnesota has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,790 MSRP for $39,758 ($28,032 off)
Troncalli CDJR in Georgia has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,590 MSRP for $42,697 ($24,893 off)
Whitewater CDJR in Minnesota has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,790 MSRP for $43,846 ($23,944 off)
Antioch CDJR in Illinois has a 2025 Wagoneer S Limited with a $67,790 MSRP for $44,540 ($23,250 off)
“Stellantis bet big on electric versions of iconic American brands like Jeep and Dodge, but consumers aren’t buying the premise,” writes CDG’s Marcus Amick. “(Stellantis’ dealer body) is now stuck with expensive EVs that need huge discounts to move, eating into already thin margins while competitors focus on [more] profitable gas-powered vehicles.”
All of which is to say: if you’ve found yourself drawn to the Jeep Wagoneer S, but couldn’t quite stomach the $70,000+ window stickers, you might want to check in with your local Jeep dealer and see how you feel about it at a JCPenneys-like 30% off!
Jeep Wagoneer S gallery
Original content from Electrek; images via Stellantis.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.