Waymo has released new research saying that its driverless robotaxis reduce pedestrian- and cyclist-involved collisions by 82%-92%, and crashes that involve an injury by 96%, when compared to the average driver.
Waymo has been operating its autonomous, driverless Level 4 robotaxis for several years now, and is continuing to (slowly) roll them out to more metro areas in the US. They’ve been operating in Phoenix since 2019 in some capacity, and entered San Francisco in 2022, Los Angeles in 2023, and Austin, Texas in 2024, plus they’ve just started testing in Atlanta, Georgia.
In that time, the company has racked up 56.7 million miles of operation, allowing it to have a big enough sample to start understanding how its driving capabilities compare to the overall vehicle fleet.
Today it released a research paper that it has published, suggesting that its vehicles are indeed quite a lot safer, especially when it comes to “vulnerable road users” like pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Waymo released a table showing the total number of incidents it had in each location, inclusive of not just crashes with vulnerable road users, but vehicle-to-vehicle crashes as well.
Location
Any injury
Airbag deployed
Serious injury+
Phoenix
24
8
0
San Francisco
16
7
2
Los Angeles
8
2
0
Austin
0
1
0
All Locations
48
18
2
But in its press release it highlighted vulnerable road users specifically, showing that Waymo’s robotaxis had a 92% reduction in crashes involving an injury with pedestrians and an 82% reduction with both cyclists and motorcyclists. This increases to a 96% reduction in injuries in intersections, which are one of the most dangerous parts of the road, and 85% reduction in crashes with “suspected serious injuries” or worse.
Due to the high number of miles studied, results for some specific environments and types of crashes are statistically significant, but some of Waymo’s other results are not – because some of these types of crashes are extremely rare. So more research will come as more miles get racked up.
Along with its blog post, Waymo released a short video with some examples of avoided crashes with vulnerable road users:
Waymo’s results show a particularly stark difference given that pedestrian injuries are at a 40-year high in America. Until around 2012, the trendline for pedestrian injury and death was trending downwards, showing that roads and cars were getting safer for other road users.
Waymo’s research has been accepted for publication in the scientific journal Traffic Injury Prevention.
Electrek’s Take
We took a ride in a Waymo when the service first came to LA and you can read my long writeup of that here, including lots of video showing how the car performed in some pretty difficult road situations. I was quite impressed, but it still isn’t perfect.
But Waymo has put quite a premium on safety, which it can do because it’s funded by Google’s deep pockets. It has spent quite a bit of money on developing and attaching its sensor suite to its robotaxis, and the statistics seem to suggest that that expenditure has paid off.
Though it sort of already has paid off, as Waymo’s main driverless competitor, Cruise, ended operations in 2023 after a high-profile crash. Cruise’s vehicle was not at fault for the crash (a human driver caused it, hitting a pedestrian into the Cruise vehicle), but Cruise subsequently was found to have misled investigators, which was a big no-no.
Waymo’s sensor-heavy is different than the approach taken by another company that talks a lot about self-driving, Tesla. Tesla is using a camera-only system, whereas Waymo has several other sensors, like radar and LiDAR (you may have heard about the difference between these two in a recent controversial Mark Rober video, which everyone seems to have missed the point of).
There are some strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and time will tell which one works out the best. Tesla’s solution is more scalable and the company has far more road miles covered than Waymo does, but the quality of Tesla’s data is lower due to its smaller (and cheaper) sensor suite.
Tesla occasionally releases a safety report, but the data included is quite minimal and has not been published in any scientific journals for peer review.
But most observers (other than Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whose observational capacities are questionable these days; and Andrej Karpathy, a well-respected top AI researcher and former Tesla AI lead) think that camera-only is not going to be able to get us to true self-driving vehicles.
Charge your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Elon Musk claims that Tesla (TSLA) shorts, people betting against the company’s stock, are going to be ‘obliterated, ‘ but there’s a big if to his prediction.
‘Shorts’ is a term used to refer to people betting against the stock of a company. They have long played a significant role in Tesla’s history on the stock market, and CEO Elon Musk has frequently commented on the situation, going so far as to predict their downfall and criticize them at every opportunity.
Throughout the years, Tesla was often topping the list of the most shorted stocks on the NASDAQ. As the automaker became profitable, shorts started to take losses and lose interest.
However, people who shorted Tesla made a lot of money earlier this year after shorting the stock following a rally over Trump’s election and Musk’s relationship with Trump.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Tesla’s stock has since recovered, and now, the short position on Tesla has stabilized at around 2.6% of the float, which is historically fairly regular and far from previous highs.
Nonetheless, CEO Elon Musk decided to take a jab at them today by claiming that they will be “obliterated” if they don’t sell their positions “before Tesla reaches autonomy at scale”:
“If they don’t exit their short position before Tesla reaches autonomy at scale, they will be obliterated.”
The operating phrase here is clearly: “before Tesla reaches autonomy at scale.”
Musk has been promising that Tesla will reach autonomy at scale by the end of every year for the last 6 years, and it has never happened.
The CEO’s latest timeline is that “autonomy will start positively contributing to Tesla around the second half of 2026.”
In the meantime, Tesla’s “Robotaxi” in Austin is still supervised by a Tesla employee in each vehicle, “Robotaxi” in California is just a ride-hailing service with employees in the driver’s seat, and Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving Supervised” in consumer cars has barely improved since Tesla launched v13 last year.
Electrek’s Take
I think Tesla shareholders hoping for a short squeeze should manage their expectations. With only 2.6% of the float and about a day to cover, any short squeeze would have a minimal impact.
However, I think Elon is probably right. If Tesla reaches autonomy at scale on his timeline, Tesla’s stock would shoot up, but there are huge caveats to this prediction.
Firstly, if you believe Elon’s latest timeline for the second half of next year, there are several significant events that are expected to occur at Tesla before then.
With the tax credit set to expire in the US and increasing competition in Europe and China, Tesla is expected to face several tough quarters after Q3. Elon himself admitted it during the last earnings call.
We are not just talking about Tesla continuing its earnings decline, which has been a clear trend for two years now, but we are talking about Tesla likely losing money, starting in Q1 2026. I don’t think shareholders and the market are ready for that.
Tesla’s liability regarding its failed autonomy promises and crashes is also increasing with more lawsuits advancing through the legal process every week.
In short, Tesla’s stock could take a significant hit over the next 12 months due to its declining EV business and increased liabilities.
Secondly, that’s assuming Elon’s latest autonomy prediction comes true, which has historically been a bad bet.
So Tesla’s fundamentals are about to crash, based on Elon’s own comment, but shorts will get “obliterated” if Elon’s historically terrible autonomy prediction finally comes true. Sounds like a big if to me.
That said, I wouldn’t necessarily recommend shorting Tesla’s stock based on this. The stock is clearly manipulated and trades primarily based on Elon Musk’s lies.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Huffy, the classic bicycle brand that became a staple of so many childhoods, is selling its Coastal Cruiser e‑bike for an enticing $299.
That sale price is marked down from an MSRP of $899 – which is much closer to what you’d expect to pay for something like this.
On the surface, $299 is pretty remarkable value. For less than most basic electric scooters (or even most decent pedal bikes), you’re getting a 26‑inch wheel electric cruiser with a 36V battery with a claimed 40-mile (64 km) range, a 350W rear‑hub motor, front and rear disc brakes, a comfort saddle, LCD display, and an LED headlight, all with free shipping. At 53 pounds (24 kg), that’s actually lighter than most electric cruisers out there.
But before you think you’ve stumbled on some too‑good‑to‑be‑true deal, it’s worth asking: why is it so cheap?
Advertisement – scroll for more content
First, caveats aside, Class 2 e‑bike compliance means it’s limited to 20 mph (32 km/h), so there’s no classic ‘Murican high-speed Class 3 riding here. You do get a throttle, but it’s 20 mph unless you’re going downhill. And if you do prefer Class 1 compliance, the right side thumb throttle looks easy enough to remove.
Then there’s the parts spec. While workable, the loadout is far from premium: mechanical disc brakes, single‑speed drivetrain, and no suspension. It’s clearly built for casual beachside or neighborhood cruising, not serious hills or daily commuting. At least Huffy does say it comes with an anti-corrosion coating, which should be good for seaside communities with salty air.
There is no word on the brand of the battery or motor, and there is no discussion of potential UL certification or other safety compliance for the battery or electrical system.
Then there’s the question of availability: Huffy is known for heavy discounting and frequent clearance moves. This may simply be them clearing out stock – possibly from overstock or just clearing warehouse space for new models. And while their 10-year warranty sounds generous, check the fine print: It’s only the frames that get the 10 years, while smaller components and the electrical system come with a six-month warranty.
Still, at $299, even a stripped-down, no-frills electric bike is tempting. For riders who just want a comfortable, simple, leisurely ride, like something for a relaxing cruise on the boardwalk to finish out the summer, this might be a compelling entry point. But go in expecting more of a relaxing cruiser than a performance commuter.
Electrek’s Take
I was pretty surprised to see this pop into my inbox, especially since past major sales from big bike companies are usually still twice this price.
Huffy’s Coastal Cruiser e-bike at $299 is definitely an attention-grabber, and maybe a bargain, but it’s worth a second look before assuming it’s a steal. As always, consider what you need in terms of power, range, quality, and long-term reliability. I’ve written before about the hidden cost of cheap e-bikes, and it’s something to keep in mind.
To be honest, I’m thinking of snagging one at this price, though almost more out of a sense of morbid curiosity for what $299 gets you (and I can hope that an article and video on the topic will come close to covering the outlay – an advantage not afforded to most people). It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve bought an ultra-low-cost e-bike just to see what I get.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
With a 236-foot wingspan that’s wider than a 747’s, the battery and solar-powered Skydweller Aero drone is pushing the boundaries of aviation. And, after back-to-back three-day flights without recharging, it’s pushing the boundaries of energy efficiency, too, begging the question: is perpetual aviation really here?
In the thick and humid pre-dawn air of a thin ribbon of airstrip just north of Interstate 10 on Mississippi’s Gulf Coast, the Skydweller Aero crew set about proving that its massive unmanned drone, which promised to fly, without fuel, and virtually forever, could deliver.
Three-days later, the Skydweller came down, as planned. The crew checked it, inspected its 17,000 solar cells, gave it the all-clear, then took off again.
Forever flight
Skydweller solar plane; via Skydweller Aero.
“It always takes a little longer than you think, but we’re getting there,” says Robert Miller, CEO and co-founder of the perpetual solar flight startup. “Every 12 months we see a quantum step in where we’re headed.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Skydweller’s most recent three-day tests were conducted by the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD). Fitting, as the Navy is one of the drone’s most likely customers.
Skydweller Aero makes it clear, however, that the company isn’t out to become just a defense contractor. They have civilian ambitions for their aircraft, as well, and mention the possibilities of sensor suites for weather research, astronomy, law enforcement, and remote outpost support, as well as the possibility of serving as something like a “low orbit” Starlink satellite.
You can watch the Skydweller’s initial flight test from last summer, below, then let us know what you think the big drone’s primary use case will be (bombs) in the comments.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.