Coterra Energy is cutting back on its oil drilling in response to sagging crude prices and spending more on natural gas production — but that move, announced alongside first-quarter results, is being overshadowed by some operational concerns and leading to a stock sell-off Tuesday. Revenue in the first quarter increased 33% year over year to $1.9 billion, short of the $1.97 billion consensus estimate, according to LSEG. Adjusted earnings per share of 80 cents in the three months ended March 31 matched expectations, LSEG data showed. On an annual basis, adjusted EPS increased 56.9%. Free cash flow of $663 million topped estimates of $596 million, according to FactSet. Bottom line We have long coveted Coterra’s mix of oil and natural gas assets because it gives the company flexibility to respond to inherently volatile commodity prices. Our biggest takeaway from Coterra’s late Monday release and Tuesday morning conference call: That flexibility is being put to serious use in the current unfavorable oil market. But even if we support that move in principle, some operational issues in a certain part of the company’s Texas acreage are getting a lot of attention and are likely among the biggest drivers of the steep 8.5% stock decline. CTRA YTD mountain Coterra YTD While executives did a good job explaining their plan to fix the issue on Tuesday’s earnings call — and making it clear that they do not believe it is a structural problem with the quality of inventory — we’re not in a hurry to step in and take advantage of this sell-off. Coterra is still worth owning as our only oil-and-gas play, providing a solid dividend payout, acting as a geopolitical hedge and offering some exposure to long-term trends that could drive increased natural gas demand such as artificial intelligence computing and growing U.S. exports of liquified natural gas. But in the near term, the stock may struggle to gain traction. We’re reiterating our hold-equivalent 2 rating , but lowering our price target to $28. Commentary There are three main themes from Coterra’s earnings report — and none of them really have to do with the actual first-quarter results, which, as the chart above shows, were mixed. Not that bad, but also not exceptional. 1. Macro landscape The first area of discussion is around the macro landscape and Coterra’s decision to spend less on oil. Coterra and its American oil-producing brethren are confronting a difficult setup, thanks to a steep decline in crude prices over the past month that has brought West Texas Intermediate crude , the U.S. oil benchmark, to four-year lows below $58 a barrel . At the start of April, WTI traded above $71 a barrel. There are two main reasons for the pullback: President Donald Trump ‘s intensified trade war has fueled concerns about a global economic slowdown — a bad thing for oil demand if it comes to fruition. At the same time, the group of eight oil-producing nations known as OPEC+ has announced a series of surprisingly aggressive moves to bring more supply to the market in the coming months. The most recent of those decisions was announced over the weekend. While Saudi Arabia-led OPEC+ might typically be expected to curtail output in the face of potential demand destruction, the opposite is happening. A variety of factors could be motivating OPEC+’s counterinitiative actions, including internal politics within the oil cartel, analysts say. But for our purposes here, what matters most is that anything that materially weakens the outlook for crude prices — whether it’s trade-related recession fears, OPEC+ or both — makes Coterra’s job of profitably drilling for oil harder to do. Not impossible, but the company and its peers make a whole lot more money when WTI is $75 a barrel than they do at $55. And so, the new set of facts requires them to reconsider what the best use of money is and adjust accordingly if something else is better for their investors. Coterra’s new plan to reduce oil-focused spending is a sensible one in the near term, and it is made possible by its presence in both the oil-rich Permian Basin in western Texas and Southeastern New Mexico and the natural gas-heavy Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and other parts of the Appalachian region. Coterra also has wells in the Anadarko Basin that spans the Texas Panhandle and western Oklahoma, but its planned activity there this year is not changing. In the Permian, though, Coterra now plans to average just seven rigs in the second half of 2025, down from the 10-rig plan announced in late February. Rigs are the machinery used to drill a well. As such, its planned Permian capital investments this year are coming down by $150 million. Meanwhile, Coterra restarted activity in the Marcellus in April with two rigs, as previously projected. But the company said it now expects to keep both rigs running into the second half of the year, lifting its capital spending in the region by an additional $50 million. Another $50 million could be added to those plans if Coterra decides to keep its second rig running through year-end, though executives said that decision will be made in the third quarter. On Tuesday’s earnings call, CEO Tom Jorden said he’s hopeful that the tariff situation is resolved and the “threat of recession is lifted,” but he stressed that “we can’t run our program on hope.” “Right now, we’re relaxing slightly [on oil spending] because we’re concerned that oil prices could further weaken. I hope we’re wrong on that,” Jorden said. “But our experience tells us that when you see these events – and you see the possibility – be prepared for the worst-case scenario.” The net effect of these changes is Coterra’s total capital expenditure projections for 2025 came down by $100 million at the midpoint of its new guidance range — and yet the company’s total production guidance was actually nudged higher for the year, driven entirely by more natural gas output. Expecting more total production on less spending is a reflection of Coterra’s ability to be a capital-efficient operator. That is a positive in the short run. However, investors might be questioning what these changes mean to Coterra’s production levels in 2026 and 2027, analysts at Mizuho Securities wrote before Tuesday’s earnings call, considering last quarter the company provided three-year outlook that included annual average oil growth of at least 5%. Executives fielded a number of questions on the three-year plans, but they repeatedly said it remained intact. “We’re holding to our three-year plan as outlined with the changes that we’ve discussed in this call. We want to be really clear with everybody on that,” Jorden said. 2. Free cash flow Another big theme: Coterra’s free cash flow outlook for this year was cut by 22% to $2.1 billion — and while lower commodity price assumptions outside its control is a big driver of the revision, investors might be worried this will limit the amount of share repurchases this year, particularly if oil prices get even weaker. The company’s commitment has been to return at least half of its free cash flow to shareholders via dividend payouts and stock buybacks. But in 2025, in particular, executives have prioritized paying down debt — tied to its two Permian-focused acquisitions that closed earlier this year — over buybacks. “We still have the ability to do it all, so to speak, but to be really clear, in 2025, our priority is going to be debt repayment. We’re not going to compromise that,” CFO Shane Young said on the call. “That doesn’t mean that there’s not going to be repurchases. … But if you look at 2024, we returned 90% of cash flow to shareholders. [In 2023], we returned 76% of cash flow to shareholders. Why were we able to do that? Because we had low leverage. And we believe that having low leverage is an enabler, and we’re dead-set focused on protecting our long-term shareholder return objectives, and we think the best way to do that is to reduce debt.” 3. Operational issues The final major theme — and likely a major culprit for the stock reaction — is operational issues plaguing some of Coterra’s operations in Culberson County, Texas, which is part of the Permian. At the highest level, some of the wells in an area called Harkey were producing higher-than-normal water volumes, so the company paused development there to work through the issue. At this time, Jorden said Coterra is “pretty optimistic that this is a mechanical operation that is solvable with a combination of revised pipe design and cementing program,” rather than something strategically wrong with the land that threatens the quality of inventory. “As we currently see it, we think we’ll be back to completing and drilling these Harkey wells in months, not years,” Jorden said. 2025 guidance Here’s where Coterra’s full-year guidance stands after the numerous aforementioned revisions: Estimated discretionary cash flow of $4.3 billion based on WTI crude prices of $63 a barrel and natural gas prices of $3.70 per metric million British thermal unit, or mmbtu. That’s below Wall Street expectations of $4.62, according to FactSet, and previous guidance of $5 billion, which factored in higher prices for both commodities. Estimated free cash flow of $2.1 billion based on the commodity price assumptions used in the discretionary cash flow guide. That is down from $2.7 billion previously. Estimated capital expenditure budget of $2 billion to $2.3 billion, down by $100 million on both ends of the range. That results in a new midpoint of $2.15 billion compared with the prior guide of $2.25 billion. Seven rigs in operation in the Permian in the second half of the year, lower than the previous plan to operate 10 rigs. Expected 2025 total equivalent production of 720 to 770 Mboe/d. The 745 midpoint of the range — up from 740 in its previous guidance — is slightly below the FactSet consensus forecast of 757 Mboe/d, which stands for total oil equivalent of a thousand barrels per day. Expected oil production in the range of 155 to 165 Mbo/d, which stands for a thousand of barrels of oil per day. The midpoint of the range is unchanged at 160 Mbo/d, despite modestly lowering the top end of the range and slightly increasing the bottom end. The FactSet consensus is for 163.6 Mbo/d. Expected natural gas production in the range of 2,725 to 2,875 MMcf/d, resulting in a new midpoint of 2,800, up from 2,775. That is below the consensus of 2,837 MMcf/d, according to FactSet. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long CTRA. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
An oil pumpjack is shown near the Callon Petroleum vicinity on March 27, 2024 in Monahans, Texas.
Brandon Bell | Getty Images News | Getty Images
Coterra Energy is cutting back on its oil drilling in response to sagging crude prices and spending more on natural gas production — but that move, announced alongside first-quarter results, is being overshadowed by some operational concerns and leading to a stock sell-off Tuesday.
Pentagon-backed MP Materials warned investors this week to approach other rare earths projects with caution, pointing to the industry’s difficult economics.
Stocks of U.S. rare earth companies have had wild swings in recent months as investors have speculated that the Trump administration might strike more deals along the lines of its landmark agreement with MP. Smaller retail traders have gotten involved in the stocks with the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF up 60% this year.
The Defense Department in July took an equity stake in MP, set a price floor for the company, and inked an offtake agreement with the rare earth miner and magnet maker in an effort to roll back China’s dominance of the industry.
CEO James Litinsky said he didn’t want “people to get burned” amid the speculation. Litinsky cautioned investors “to just be very clear-eyed about what the actual structural economics are amidst all the excitement.”
“The vast majority of projects being promoted today simply will not work at virtually any price,” Litinksy said on the company’s third-quarter earnings call Thursday evening.
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, YTD
MP views itself as “America’s national champion,” Litinsky said. MP is the only active rare earth miner in the U.S. and has offtake agreements with Apple and General Motors in addition to the Pentagon.
“We have structural advantage because we’re fully vertically integrated,” the CEO said. “We’re years and billions ahead of others.”
It takes years for the best rare earth producers to ramp up and stabilize their output and economics “despite what some promoters might suggest,” Litinksy said. Australia’s Lynas took about a decade and MP will reach normalized production in about three years from the start of commissioning, he said.
The White House is “not ruling out other deals with equity stakes or price floors as we did with MP Materials, but that doesn’t mean every initiative we take would be in the shape of the MP deal,” a Trump administration official told CNBC in September.
Litinsky described the rare earth industry as close to a “structural oligopoly,” a system where there are just a few major players. The government investing in a dozens of sites and businesses wouldn’t necessarily set up a supply chain, he said.
The Trump administration should continue to encourage private capital to flow into the industry through loans, grants and other support, Litinsky said. There is room for “a lot of other players and supply” but the market will require “materially higher prices” for the industry’s structural challenges to change, he said.
“If X dollars of capital can stimulate two or three X in private capital, they should be doing that as much as possible,” Litinsky said.
The CEO indicated that he views MP as a forerunner that will help create the conditions for a broader market that is not dependent on China over time.
“In the very short term the administration has made sure that we have a successful national champion in MP,” Litinsky said. “We are going to sort of pave the path if you will to then figure out how there’s much broader supply coming online.”
Rare earths are crucial for making magnets that are key inputs in U.S. weapons platforms, semiconductor manufacturing, electric vehicles, clean energy technology and consumer electronics. Beijing dominates the global supply chain and the U.S. is dependent on China for imports.
This week on Electrek’s Wheel-E podcast, we discuss the most popular news stories from the world of electric bikes and other nontraditional electric vehicles. This time, that includes a new e-bike model from Tenways, California kills off its e-bike voucher program, a review of the new VMAX VX2 Hub e-scooter, Zero launches a scooter, NIU’s got a new micro-car, and more.
The Wheel-E podcast returns every two weeks on Electrek’s YouTube channel, Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter.
As a reminder, we’ll have an accompanying post, like this one, on the site with an embedded link to the live stream. Head to the YouTube channel to get your questions and comments in.
After the show ends, the video will be archived on YouTube and the audio on all your favorite podcast apps:
We also have a Patreon if you want to help us to avoid more ads and invest more in our content. We have some awesome gifts for our Patreons and more coming.
Here are a few of the articles that we will discuss during the Wheel-E podcast today:
Here’s the live stream for today’s episode starting at 9:00 a.m. ET (or the video after 10:00 a.m. ET):
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Nvidia has established itself as the undisputed leader in artificial intelligence chips, selling large quantities of silicon to most of the world’s biggest tech companies en route to a $4.5 trillion market cap.
One of Nvidia’s key clients is Google, which has been loading up on the chipmaker’s graphics processing units, or GPUs, to try and keep pace with soaring demand for AI compute power in the cloud.
While there’s no sign that Google will be slowing its purchases of Nvidia GPUs, the internet giant is increasingly showing that it’s not just a buyer of high-powered silicon. It’s also a developer.
On Thursday, Google announced that its most powerful chip yet, called Ironwood, is being made widely available in the coming weeks. It’s the seventh generation of Google’s Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU, the company’s custom silicon that’s been in the works for more than a decade.
TPUs are application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, which play a crucial role in AI by providing highly specialized and efficient hardware for particular tasks. Google says Ironwood is designed to handle the heaviest AI workloads, from training large models to powering real-time chatbots and AI agents, and is more than four times faster than its predecessor. AI startup Anthropic plans to use up to 1 million of them to run its Claude model.
For Google, TPUs offer a competitive edge at a time when all the hyperscalers are rushing to build mammoth data centers, and AI processors can’t get manufactured fast enough to meet demand. Other cloud companies are taking a similar approach, but are well behind in their efforts.
Amazon Web Services made its first cloud AI chip, Inferentia, available to customers in 2019, followed by Trainium three years later. Microsoft didn’t announce its first custom AI chip, Maia, until the end of 2023.
“Of the ASIC players, Google’s the only one that’s really deployed this stuff in huge volumes,” said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst covering semiconductors at Bernstein. “For other big players, it takes a long time and a lot of effort and a lot of money. They’re the furthest along among the other hyperscalers.”
Google didn’t provide a comment for this story.
Originally trained for internal workloads, Google’s TPUs have been available to cloud customers since 2018. Of late, Nvidia has shown some level of concern. When OpenAI signed its first cloud contract with Google earlier this year, the announcement spurred Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to initiate further talks with the AI startup and its CEO, Sam Altman, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.
Unlike Nvidia, Google isn’t selling its chips as hardware, but rather providing access to TPUs as a service through its cloud, which has emerged as one of the company’s big growth drivers. In its third-quarter earnings report last week, Google parent Alphabet said cloud revenue increased 34% from a year earlier to $15.15 billion, beating analyst estimates. The company ended the quarter with a business backlog of $155 billion.
“We are seeing substantial demand for our AI infrastructure products, including TPU-based and GPU-based solutions,” CEO Sundar Pichai said on the earnings call. “It is one of the key drivers of our growth over the past year, and I think on a going-forward basis, I think we continue to see very strong demand, and we are investing to meet that.”
Google doesn’t break out the size of its TPU business within its cloud segment. Analysts at D.A. Davidson estimated in September that a “standalone” business consisting of TPUs and Google’s DeepMind AI division could be valued at about $900 billion, up from an estimate of $717 billion in January. Alphabet’s current market cap is more than $3.4 trillion.
‘Tightly targeted’ chips
Customization is a major differentiator for Google. One critical advantage, analysts say, is the efficiency TPUs offer customers relative to competitive products and services.
“They’re really making chips that are very tightly targeted for their workloads that they expect to have,” said James Sanders, an analyst at Tech Insights.
Rasgon said that efficiency is going to become increasingly important because with all the infrastructure that’s being built, the “likely bottleneck probably isn’t chip supply, it’s probably power.”
On Tuesday, Google announced Project Suncatcher, which explores “how an interconnected network of solar-powered satellites, equipped with our Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) AI chips, could harness the full power of the Sun.”
As a part of the project, Google said it plans to launch two prototype solar-powered satellites carrying TPUs by early 2027.
“This approach would have tremendous potential for scale, and also minimizes impact on terrestrial resources,” the company said in the announcement. “That will test our hardware in orbit, laying the groundwork for a future era of massively-scaled computation in space.”
Dario Amodei, co-founder and chief executive officer of Anthropic, at the World Economic Forum in 2025.
Stefan Wermuth | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Google’s largest TPU deal on record landed late last month, when the company announced a massive expansion of its agreement with OpenAI rival Anthropic valued in the tens of billions of dollars. With the partnership, Google is expected to bring well over a gigawatt of AI compute capacity online in 2026.
“Anthropic’s choice to significantly expand its usage of TPUs reflects the strong price-performance and efficiency its teams have seen with TPUs for several years,” Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian said at the time of the announcement.
Google has invested $3 billion in Anthropic. And while Amazon remains Anthropic’s most deeply embedded cloud partner, Google is now providing the core infrastructure to support the next generation of Claude models.
“There is such demand for our models that I think the only way we would have been able to serve as much as we’ve been able to this year is this multi-chip strategy,” Anthropic Chief Product Officer Mike Krieger told CNBC.
That strategy spans TPUs, Amazon Trainium and Nvidia GPUs, allowing the company to optimize for cost, performance and redundancy. Krieger said Anthropic did a lot of up-front work to make sure its models can run equally well across the silicon providers.
“I’ve seen that investment pay off now that we’re able to come online with these massive data centers and meet customers where they are,” Krieger said.
Hefty spending is coming
Two months before the Anthropic deal, Google forged a six-year cloud agreement with Meta worth more than $10 billion, though it’s not clear how much of the arrangement includes use of TPUs. And while OpenAI said it will start using Google’s cloud as it diversifies away from Microsoft, the company told Reuters it’s not deploying GPUs.
Alphabet CFO Anat Ashkenazi attributed Google’s cloud momentum in the latest quarter to rising enterprise demand for Google’s full AI stack. The company said it signed more billion-dollar cloud deals in the first nine months of 2025 than in the previous two years combined.
“In GCP, we see strong demand for enterprise AI infrastructure, including TPUs and GPUs,” Ashkenazi said, adding that users are also flocking to the company’s latest Gemini offerings as well as services “such as cybersecurity and data analytics.”
Amazon, which reported 20% growth in its market-leading cloud infrastructure business last quarter, is expressing similar sentiment.
AWS CEO Matt Garman told CNBC in a recent interview that the company’s Trainium chip series is gaining momentum. He said “every Trainium 2 chip we land in our data centers today is getting sold and used,” and he promised further performance gains and efficiency improvements with Trainium 3.
Shareholders have shown a willingness to stomach hefty investments.
Google just raised the high end of its capital expenditures forecast for the year to $93 billion, up from prior guidance of $85 billion, with an even steeper ramp expected in 2026. The stock price soared 38% in the third quarter, its best performance for any period in 20 years, and is up another 17% in the fourth quarter.
Mizuho recently pointed to Google’s distinct cost and performance advantage with TPUs, noting that while the chips were originally built for internal use, Google is now winning external customers and bigger workloads.
Morgan Stanley analysts wrote in a report in June that while Nvidia’s GPUs will likely remain the dominant chip provider in AI, growing developer familiarity with TPUs could become a meaningful driver of Google Cloud growth.
And analysts at D.A. Davidson said in September that they see so much demand for TPUs that Google should consider selling the systems “externally to customers,” including frontier AI labs.
“We continue to believe that Google’s TPUs remain the best alternative to Nvidia, with the gap between the two closing significantly over the past 9-12 months,” they wrote. “During this time, we’ve seen growing positive sentiment around TPUs.”