Connect with us

Published

on

A judge has ordered Rebekah Vardy to pay Coleen Rooney at least £1.4m in legal costs after the latter won the high-profile Wagatha Christie libel suit against her.

A specialist costs court was told on Tuesday that Mrs Vardy had agreed to pay almost £1.2m to Mrs Rooney after unsuccessfully suing her at the High Court in 2022.

But the judge decided she should pay more.

The high-profile court case took place after Mrs Rooney accused Mrs Vardy on social media in 2019 of leaking her private information to the press.

Mrs Vardy, wife of Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy, unsuccessfully tried to sue Mrs Rooney in a libel battle that captivated some areas of the public and was later dramatised for TV.

After Mrs Vardy lost the battle, the judge ordered her to pay 90% of Mrs Rooney’s costs, including an initial payment of £800,000.

On Tuesday, the specialist costs court heard Mrs Vardy had agreed to pay £1.19m of Mrs Rooney’s legal bill.

More on Coleen Rooney

It also heard Mrs Rooney was asking for a further £315,000 in “assessment costs”.

Costs Judge Mark Whalan said it was “reasonable and proportionate” for Mrs Vardy to pay £212,266 of Mrs Rooney’s assessment costs, inclusive of VAT but before interest, on top of the £1.19m settlement, totalling at least £1.4m.

The judge said that he was “generally happy” that the outcome was a “commercially satisfactory conclusion for both sides”, but that there had been “extraordinary expenditure of costs” by the parties.

He said: “I do mean it when I say that I hope that this is the end of a long and unhappy road.”

Read more:
Five things we learn from Rooney’s Wagatha Christie documentary
The ‘Wagatha Christie’ libel case explained

In her written submissions, Mrs Vardy’s barrister, Juliet Wells, had said Mrs Rooney’s original £1.8m legal bill was “substandard” and included costs “of briefing the press” and others to which she had “no entitlement”.

She claimed the bill could have been settled sooner if Mrs Rooney had “engaged more constructively”.

Ms Wells said Mrs Vardy had offered to settle the legal bill for £1.1m, excluding interest and assessment costs, in August 2024, which was rejected “out of hand”.

She said: “Mrs Vardy went to significant lengths to negotiate the bill despite being hamstrung by a lack of information and cooperation from Mrs Rooney’s camp.

“By contrast, Mrs Rooney’s tone when it came to settlement negotiations was intransigent and frequently belligerent.”

Robin Dunne, for Mrs Rooney, said in written submissions that Mrs Vardy had been “drip feeding” settlement offers.

He said Mrs Rooney’s lawyers had to complete “additional work” as “lurid headlines arising from briefings from Mrs Vardy’s camp dominated the press in the days before and during the hearings” in the case.

He said: “There will rarely be a case where it can be said with greater force that Mrs Vardy is the author of her own misfortune.”

The row was nicknamed Wagatha Christie after Mrs Rooney – a former wife and girlfriend (WAG) of an England star – said that she had worked out who had been leaking stories about her to the press.

Continue Reading

UK

Millions of people could each get hundreds of pounds in compensation over car loan mis-selling

Published

on

By

Millions of people could each get hundreds of pounds in compensation over car loan mis-selling

Up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700 in compensation due to car loan mis-selling, the financial services regulator has said.

Nearly half (44%) of all car loan agreements made between April 2007 and November 2024 could be eligible for payouts, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.

Those eligible for the compensation will have had a loan where the broker received commission from a lender.

Lenders broke the law by not sharing this fact with consumers, the FCA said, and customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.

A scheme is seen by the FCA as the best outcome for consumers and lenders, as it avoids the courts and the Financial Ombudsman Service, therefore minimising delay, uncertainty and administration costs.

The scheme will be funded by the dozens of lenders involved in the loans, and cost about £8.2bn, on the lower end of expectations, which had been expected to reach as much as £18bn.

The figure was reached by estimating that 85% of eligible applicants will take part in the scheme.

More from Money

What if you think you’re eligible?

Anyone who believes they have been impacted should contact their lender and has a year to do so. Compensation will begin to be paid in 2026, with an exact timeline yet to be worked out.

The FCA said it would move “as quickly as we can”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Payouts due after motor finance scandal

People who have already complained do not need to take action. Complaints about approximately four million loan agreements have already been received.

There’s no need to contact a solicitor or claims management firm, the FCA said, as it aimed for the scheme to be as easy as possible.

A lender won’t have to pay, however, if it can prove the customer could not have got cover anywhere else.

The number of people who will get a payout is not known. While there are 14.2 million agreements identified by the FCA, the same person may have taken out more than one loan over the 17-year period.

More expensive car loans?

Despite the fact many lenders have to contribute to redress, the FCA said the market will continue to function and pointed out the sector has grown in recent years and months.

In delivering compensation quickly, the FCA said it “can ensure that some of the trust and confidence in the market can be repaired”.

It could not, however, rule out that the scheme could mean fewer offers and more expensive car loans, but failure to introduce a scheme would have been worse.

Read more:
UK steel set for further hit as EU to double tariffs
Is another spectacular Bitcoin comedown inevitable?

The FCA said: “We cannot rule out some modest impacts on product availability and prices, we estimate the cost of dealing with complaints would be several billion pounds higher in the absence of a redress scheme.

“In that scenario, impacts on access to motor finance and prices for consumers could be significantly higher with uncertainty continuing for many more years.”

Continue Reading

UK

Kemi Badenoch repeatedly refuses to say whether she admires Nigel Farage

Published

on

By

 Kemi Badenoch repeatedly refuses to say whether she admires Nigel Farage

Kemi Badenoch has repeatedly refused to say whether she admires Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.

Speaking to Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby, the Tory leader said she did not “understand the question” when asked if she held her rival in high regard.

Politics latest: Education secretary won’t say if Jewish students are safe on campus

Asked what she thought of Mr Farage, whose party is currently leading in the polls, Ms Badenoch replied: “I think it’s very interesting that a lot of the media in Westminster is very interested about asking about Nigel Farage.

“I’m not interested in Nigel Farage, I’m interested in the Conservative Party.”

Ms Badenoch was speaking against the backdrop of the Conservative Party conference in Manchester, where the party has announced a string of policies, including a promise to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and “ICE-style” deportations if she wins the next election.

The announcements have been interpreted as an attempt to respond to the threat posed by Reform, who have already announced plans to leave the ECHR and carry out mass deportations.

More from Politics

Last month, they also vowed to scrap indefinite leave to remain, which gives people the right to settle, work and study in the UK and claim benefits, and to make obtaining British citizenship the only route to permanent residence in Britain.

However, the Conservatives have sought to use their conference to distinguish themselves from Reform, branding their spending plans “socialist”.

It comes despite a poll of Tory members by YouGov showing that 64% support an electoral pact with Reform, while almost half of Tory members – 46% – would support a full-blown merger.

Speaking to Sky News, Ms Badenoch admitted there was “a lot we could do better” given the Conservatives had dropped in the polls from 26% to 17% and her personal poll ratings stood at -47.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Tories ‘failed’ on immigration

But she said: “I don’t let these things distract me. The fact of the matter is that last year we lost in a historic defeat. We never had so few MPs, and it’s going to take time to come back from that.

“I am absolutely determined to get our party out of this, but I always said that things would get worse before they got better because we’d be out of government.”

Read more:
Tories announce plans to abolish Sentencing Council
Findings of new poll in line with views of gloomy Tory MPs

The conference has been dominated by questions of collaboration with Reform, after 20 Tory councillors announced they were defecting to Reform – on top of the eight who have moved to Nigel Farage’s party since March.

On Monday, Tory MP Andrew Rosindell said he believed the Conservatives and Reform needed to work together.

“I’ve made it clear all the way through, and nothing has changed, that I am for the Conservatives and Reform working together,” he told GB News.

“We need right-of-centre unity to defeat the left.

“If that means the Conservatives and Reform working together, we should do it. I don’t see Reform as our enemies. It’s a split on the right, and we need to come together.”

Put to her that the Tories may need to work with Reform, Ms Badenoch ruled out a pact and told Beth Rigby: “I’m not interested in doing pacts. I was not elected to have a pact with Reform.

“I was elected to change the Conservative Party, make it clear what we stand for and that’s what I’ve done at this conference.

“Robert Jenrick is not the leader of the Conservative Party, neither is Andrew Rosindell. I am.”

Continue Reading

UK

‘Who’s going to protect us?’: Ex-wife of man injured in Manchester synagogue attack says he no longer wants to live in UK

Published

on

By

'Who's going to protect us?': Ex-wife of man injured in Manchester synagogue attack says he no longer wants to live in UK

The man injured by a police bullet in the Manchester synagogue attack feels so unsafe he no longer wants to live in this country, his ex-wife has told Sky News. 

Along with their children, Naomi Finlay has been visiting Yoni Finlay in hospital since the attack last week.

She said he was “shocked” to hear about the level of antisemitism she and their children had been facing before the synagogue was targeted.

“When I went to see him in the hospital, I spoke to him about some of the antisemitism we’d faced personally,” Mrs Finlay said.

“Some of the things I hadn’t discussed with him before, and he didn’t know. And he was really, really upset for me and the children that this is what we’ve been through.

“He expressed that he definitely does not feel safe in this country – and he’s questioning his future here.”

Yoni Finlay is still in hospital after being injured by police gunfire during the attack
Image:
Yoni Finlay is still in hospital after being injured by police gunfire during the attack

Ms Finlay told Sky News that she and her children have faced threats and abuse, some reported to the police.

“We’ve been shouted at, the kids have been shouted at,” she said.

“My son, his biggest fear is being recognised as Jewish. The second he leaves the synagogue, the kippah comes off his head.

“On October the 7th, two years ago, someone tried to knock my brother over while he was walking back from the synagogue.”

Naomi Finlay says her family have been on 'constant alert'
Image:
Naomi Finlay says her family have been on ‘constant alert’

‘It’s something you’ve been waiting for’

Ms Finlay added that although the attack on the Heaton Park synagogue was a shock, as her family had been living on “constant alert”, it did not come as a surprise.

“The second I heard something, I knew absolutely – I knew what it was,” she added. “There’s no doubt in your mind. Because it’s something, yes, you’ve been waiting for – but anticipating with dread.”

It took hours before Ms Finlay was able to find out from a family member who was also at the synagogue that Yoni had been injured but was still alive.

“We live close to the synagogue – we saw and heard everything,” she said. “The beginning of the day – where we are just on the streets asking anyone, ‘Have you seen him? Have you seen him?’ – that was definitely the hardest part.

“It was so difficult for the kids, because that’s their dad.”

Read more about the synagogue attack:
Friends of attacker reveal how he became radicalised
Man who helped barricade says attacker was ‘monster’
Shapps: My father-in-law was at synagogue attack

Yoni was among those barricading the doors to stop the attacker, Jihad al Shamie, from getting inside the synagogue.

Al Shamie was shot and killed by police, but one of their bullets came through the synagogue door – striking Yoni and killing Adrian Daulby, one of the two men who lost their lives.

Yoni was in surgery for seven hours on the day of the attack. Ms Finlay added he “remembers everything”, including the moment the bullet struck.

Although she said he is still in a lot of pain, he is now stable and recovering.

“The kids have been taking him some treats,” she said, “saving him half of their chocolate bars and taking them into him.

“Things from school, letters from friends they’ve been taking in to show him. They are just really wanting him back.”

‘Who’s going to protect us?’

Two years to the day since the 7 October terror attack in Israel, Ms Finlay finds it “really hurtful” that pro-Palestine marches are taking place across the country, less than a week on from the attack in which Yoni was injured.

“It was just that little bit further away – and now it’s not further away,” she said. “Even today there’s protests going on – on one of the saddest days for Jewish people worldwide.

“I feel like we can’t even get a break on that one day to actually grieve and process our feelings.”

Although she said the police have been “amazing” since the attack, she worries about what will happen to her and her family when the attention dies down.

“We worry that in a few weeks, when all this simmers down, are we still going to feel reassured? Are we still going to be protected?

“You know, who’s going to look after our kids when they’re in school? Who’s going to look after us when we go pray in the synagogue? Who’s going to protect us?”

Continue Reading

Trending