Producer Giles Martin has said plans to allow AI firms to use artists’ work without permission, unless creators opt out, is like criminals being given free rein to burgle houses unless they are specifically told not to.
Martin, who is the son of Beatles producer George Martin and worked with Sir Paul McCartney on the Get Back documentary series and the 2023 Beatles track Now And Then, spoke to Sky News at a UK Music protest at Westminster coinciding with a parliamentary debate on the issue.
Under the plans, an exemption to copyright would be created for training artificial intelligence (AI), so tech firms would not need a licence to use copyrighted material – rather, creators would need to opt out to prevent their work from being used.
Creatives say if anything it should be opt-in rather than out, and are calling on the government to scrap the proposals and stop AI developers “stealing” their work “without payment or permission”.
Image: Giles Martin at the 2025 Grammy Awards. Pic: Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
“If you create something unique it should be unique to you,” says Martin. “It shouldn’t be able to be harvested and then used by other people. Or if it is, it should be with your permission… it shouldn’t be up to governments or big tech.”
Sir Elton John and Simon Cowell are among the celebrities who have backed a campaign opposing the proposals, and Sir Paul has also spoken out against them.
“This is about young artists,” says Martin. “If a young Paul McCartney at the age of 20 or 22 wrote Yesterday, now… big tech would almost be able to harvest that song and use it for their own means. It doesn’t make any sense, this ruling of opting out – where essentially it’s like saying, ‘you can burgle my house unless I ask you not to’.”
More on Artificial Intelligence
Related Topics:
‘I’m not anti-AI – it’s a question of permission’
The Beatles’ track Now And Then was written and recorded by John Lennon in New York in the late 1970s, and AI was used to extract his vocals for the 2023 release. The Get Back documentary also used audio restoration technology, allowing music and vocals to be isolated.
Image: AI was used to release The Beatles’ track Now And Then in 2023. Pic: Apple Corps Ltd
“I’m not anti [AI], I’m not saying we should go back to writing on scribes,” Martin said. “But I do think that it’s a question of artist’s permission.”
Using AI to “excavate” Lennon’s voice was with the permission of the late singer’s estate, he said, and is “different from me getting a 3D printer to make a John Lennon”.
He added: “The idea of, for example, whoever your favourite artist is – the future is, you get home from work and they’ll sing you a song, especially designed for you, by that artist, by that voice. And it’ll make you feel better because AI will know how you’re feeling at that time. That’s maybe a reality. Whoever that artist is, they should probably have a say in that voice.”
Crispin Hunt, of 1990s band The Longpigs, who also attended the protest, said “all technology needs some kind of oversight”.
“If you remove the ability for the world to make a living out of creativity, or if you devalue creativity to such an extent that that it becomes a hobby and worthless to do, then humanity in life will be far less rich because it’s art and culture that makes life richer,” he said. “And that’s why the companies want it for free.”
The Data (Use and Access) Bill primarily covers data-sharing agreements, but transparency safeguards were removed at committee stage.
Critics say changes need to be made to ensure that companies training generative AI models disclose whether work by a human creator has been used and protect creatives under existing copyright rules.
In February, more than 1,000 artists and musicians including Kate Bush, Damon Albarn, Sam Fender and Annie Lennox released a silent album in protest at the proposed changes.
At that time, a government spokesperson said the UK’s current rules were “holding back the creative industries, media and AI sector from realising their full potential – and that cannot continue”.
The spokesperson said they were consulting on proposals that better protect the “interests of both AI developers and right holders” and to deliver a solution “which allows both to thrive”.
Dubai’s regulator announced it had issued financial penalties against 19 companies related to digital asset activities amid approval for BitGo’s MENA entity.
Her personal poll rating, minus 47, is worse than the lowest ebb of Iain Duncan Smith’s fated leadership and worse than when Boris Johnson resigned.
To rub salt into the wounds, a Sky News/YouGov poll this week found that the majority of Tory members think Robert Jenrick should be the leader, while half don’t think she should lead them into the next general election.
Being leader of the Opposition is often described as the hardest job in politics, but for Badenoch, with Reform stealing the march as the party of the right, it looks pretty much impossible.
For someone who needs to try to win people over, Badenoch has a curious style. She likes to be known as a leader who isn’t afraid of a fight and, at times, she approached our interview at the Conservative Party conference as if she was positively looking for one.
More on Kemi Badenoch
Related Topics:
A few times in our interview when I asked her a question she didn’t like, or didn’t want to answer (it is my job to ask all politicians hard questions), she seemed tetchy.
And when I deigned to ask her whether she admired Nigel Farage, she criticised me for asking the question. She asked why I was not asking her if I admire Sir Keir Starmer or Sir Ed Davey.
Her approach surprised me, as I had asked the prime minister exactly the same question a week before. He’d answered it directly, without arguing over why I had asked it: “I think he is a formidable politician,” said Sir Keir.
Badenoch told me she didn’t understand the question, and then told me she wasn’t interested in talking about him. It made for an awkward, ill-tempered exchange.
The facts remain that Farage is topping the polls, helped by Labour’s collapsing support and the Conservatives’ deep unpopularity.
And in the run-up to our interview, Reform drip-fed the news that 20 Tory councillors were defecting to Farage’s party.
There is open talk in Badenoch’s party about whether the Tories will need to try to come to some sort of agreement with Reform at the next election to try to see off Labour and ‘progressive parties’.
Farage says absolutely not, as does Badenoch – but many in her party do not think she has that luxury.
Andrew Rosindell, MP for Romford, told GB Newshe’ll lose his seat unless the two sides “work together” and said the right must unite to defeat the left. Arch-rival Robert Jenrick pointedly refuses to rule it out, saying only it’s “not the priority”. Meanwhile, party members support an electoral pact by two to one, according to our Sky News poll.
On the matter of whether these MPs, and party members, have a point, Badenoch bristled: “It is important that people know what we stand for. Robert Jenrick is not the leader of the Conservative Party, neither is Andrew Rossindell. I am the leader of the party and we are not having a coalition or a pact with Reform.”
When I ask colleagues if they think Badenoch is too aloof, too argumentative, too abrasive to lead this rebuild, the popular refrain for her supporters is that she is “a work in progress” and that it would be madness to change the leader again.
The question is, will she be given the time to develop? The plot to oust her is active and much of the chatter around this conference is whether she might be challenged before or after the May local elections.
There are some colleagues who believe it is better to give her more time to turn things around and, if May is truly dreadful and the party goes further backwards, remove her then.
Ahead of conference, when asked by Tim Shipman of the Spectator whether she would resign if the Conservatives go backwards in May, she said rather cryptically “ask me after the locals”.
When I asked Badenoch why she said that she replied, “let’s see what the election result is about”.
When I explained that it sounded rather like she might throw in the towel after next May and so was seeking clarification, she told me that I was asking irrelevant questions.
“Your viewers want to know how their lives are going to be better. Not be inside the Westminster bubble politics of who’s up, who’s down… It’s part of the reason why the country is in this mess. Perhaps if people had scrutinised Labour’s policies instead of looking at just poll ratings, they would be running the country better.”
But Tories are looking at poll ratings and there is a view from some in the party that if the Tories wait until another drubbing in the May local, Scottish and Welsh elections, there might not be much of a party apparatus left to rebuild from.
Image: More than half of Tory members want pact with Reform
In short, there is not a settled view on when a challenge might come, but with the party in the position it is in, talk of a challenge will not go away.
Badenoch wants to make the case that her “authentic conservatism” is worth sticking with and that the policies the Conservatives are announcing will give them a pathway back.
On borders, the Tories are trying to neutralise Reform with a very similar offer. On the economy and welfare cuts, they hope they can beat Labour and Reform.
But really, the question about this party and this leader is about relevance. The prime minister didn’t even bother to name check Badenoch in his conference speech, while Davey trained his guns on Farage rather than his traditional Tory rival.
Badenoch may not like being asked about Reform, might – in her words – not be interested in Reform, but her former voters, and the country, are. The enormous challenge for her in the coming months is to see if she can get them to look at her.