Connect with us

Published

on

There was no conflict of interest in the incoming football regulator chair donating to Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour leadership campaign, Downing Street has said.

Appearing before the Culture, Media and Sport select committee on Wednesday, David Kogan admitted he had donated “very small sums of money” to the leadership bids of Sir Keir and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy in 2020.

Politics latest: PM told to back Paddington Bear

Mr Kogan told the pre-appointment hearing this hadn’t been discovered by the media, but he was “happy to declare it now”.

The media executive was nominated as chairman of the Independent Football Regulator last month, having initially been approached by the previous Conservative government.

Mr Kogan insisted he had “total personal independence from all of them”, saying he had “never actually been particularly close to any of the individuals to whom I have donated money”.

Louie French, the shadow minister for sport, has suggested there was a “potential breach of the Governance Code on Public Appointments” on this matter, saying it “must urgently be investigated”.

Mr French later told the Commons that Labour’s decision not to disclose these donations when Mr Kogan’s appointment was announced “represents a clear discourtesy to both this House and the DCMS select committee”.

This appointment may need a VAR check


Jon Craig - Chief political correspondent

Jon Craig

Chief political correspondent

@joncraig

David Kogan’s appointment seems like a case of obvious cronyism.

A bit like committing a bookable offence with the referee only yards away: the referee in this fixture being Dame Caroline Dineage, who chairs the culture, media and sport committee.

Will the MPs’ decision now go into extra time?

Tory MP Louie French wants to blow the whistle on his appointment, claiming it’s a breach of the code on public appointments.

French claims politics and sport shouldn’t mix. But every football fan knows they do, of course. Arsenal fan Starmer is just the latest prime minister to parade his passion for football.

Ironically, the regulator is not a Labour idea. It was in Boris Johnson’s 2019 Conservative manifesto and was recommended in a review by the former Tory sports minister Tracey Crouch in 2021.

But even before it kicks off, it’s showing relegation form. The Arsenal vice chair Tim Lewis, West Ham vice chair Baroness Karren Brady, and Brighton chief executive Paul Barber have all put the boot in.

Brady, a Tory peer and leading opponent in the House of Lords, claims it could deter investment. Barber claims clubs could cut funding for academies and women and girls’ football.

Now it looks like Kogan’s candour before the MPs has put him in an offside position.

And his appointment is now surely a decision for VAR.

However, Downing Street has said “all the rules have been followed” in the appointment of Mr Kogan.

He was confirmed as the culture secretary’s preferred candidate to head the watchdog on 25 April.

Sir Keir Starmer’s spokesperson insisted that a “fair and open competition” was run for the position.

Number 10 added that political activity “should not affect judgements of merit”.

Read more from Sky News:
Reform won’t suspend councillor who shared Hitler meme
UK government in ‘active discussions’ with US over film tariffs

Lisa Nandy.
Pic: PA
Image:
Lisa Nandy. Pic: PA

However, this is not the first time the appointment of the Labour Party donor has led to accusations of cronyism.

Ms Nandy rejected those claims during the Football Governance Bill’s second reading on 28 April, and pointed out the previous Conservative government had also targeted Mr Kogan for the role prior to last summer’s election.

He has previously advised the Premier League, the EFL and other leagues on broadcast rights deals in a 45-year career as a media executive, business leader and corporate adviser.

The regulator’s main remit will be to operate a licensing system for clubs in the top five tiers of the English game, focusing primarily on their financial sustainability and how accountable they are to their fans.

The legislation which will give the regulator statutory backing – the Football Governance Bill – is progressing through parliament.

Continue Reading

Politics

Dollar stability questioned as Trump ousts Federal Reserve governor

Published

on

By

Dollar stability questioned as Trump ousts Federal Reserve governor

Dollar stability questioned as Trump ousts Federal Reserve governor

Trump’s firing of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook has sparked a legal standoff and renewed concerns over the Fed’s independence.

Continue Reading

Politics

Women and children will be detained under Farage deportation plans

Published

on

By

Women and children will be detained under Farage deportation plans

Women and children would be detained and deported under Nigel Farage’s plans to stop small boat crossings in the Channel.

Addressing a news conference in Oxford, Mr Farage admitted that the question of “how we deal with children is much more complicated”, but insisted: “Women and children, everybody on arrival will be detained.”

Politics latest: Farage asks: Whose side are you on?

The Reform UK leader laid out his plans to deport hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants if he wins the next election in 2029 – saying the small boats crisis in the English Channel was fuelling “rising anger” among the public and creating a “genuine threat to public order”.

‘The boats will stop coming within days’

“The only way we will stop the boats is by detaining and deporting absolutely anyone that comes via that route,” Mr Farage said.

“And if we do that, the boats will stop coming within days, because there will be no incentive to pay a trafficker to get into this country.

More on Asylum

“If you come to the UK illegally, you will be detained and deported and never, ever allowed to stay, period. That is our big message from today.”

The news conference followed a weekend in which hundreds of people made the dangerous crossing to Britain via the Channel.

Labour says it is tackling the issue by signing its “one in, one out” pilot scheme with France, which came into force earlier this month.

It allows the UK to send some people who have crossed the Channel back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with ties to Britain – but Reform and the Conservatives have said it will make little difference given that more than 28,000 people had made the crossing to the UK in 2025 alone.

Under Reform’s “operation restoring justice programme” – which has been denounced by Opposition parties as “inflammatory” and “unworkable” – anyone who arrives in the UK illegally via small boat would be detained and deported and refused permission to stay.

Mr Farage said he believed the party would be able to deport around 600,000 asylum seekers in the first parliament of a potential Reform UK government, at an estimated cost of £10bn over the five-year period.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Migrants attempt Channel crossing

Illegal migrants would be forced to return to their home countries, something the Reform leader said could be achieved by the UK by choosing not to follow certain human rights laws.

The party is planning to repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act and leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), arguing that such laws have allowed foreign offenders to challenge their own deportation orders through the courts and remain in the UK.

It would also disapply the 1951 Refugee Contention and the UN Convention Against Torture, and the Council of Europe’s anti-trafficking convention, which prevent people from being deported to countries where they face the prospect of torture or ill treatment.

Instead, under its own Illegal Migration (Mass Deportation) Bill, those who come to the UK on small boats will be barred from claiming asylum, and held in detention centres on spare RAF bases rather than taxpayer-funded hotels – which have been subject to a number of protests from local communities in recent months.

‘The alternative is to do nothing’

Reform is also seeking to sign returns deals with countries including Afghanistan, despite its poor human rights record and the threat that those sent back would be subject to torture and ill treatment.

Mr Farage faced a number of questions about the human rights abuses perpetuated by the likes of Afghanistan and Eritrea, another country he is seeking to send illegal migrants to if they arrive in Britain.

Asked whether he was “comfortable” with the prospect of people being tortured if they were sent back after entering the UK illegally, Mr Farage said: “What really bothers me is what is happening on the streets of our country. What really bothers me is what is happening to British citizens.”

Read more:
Far right ’emboldened’ says MP
More than 80% of shoplifting offences result in no charge

He added: “The alternative, of course, is to do nothing. That’s the very clear alternative, is that we just do nothing. We just allow this problem to magnify and grow.

“We head to a point, where there, and I genuinely, I don’t want this to happen, I want our proposals to be accepted so we can prevent civil disorder from happening, but that is the direction this country is headed in. We cannot be responsible for all the sins that take place around the world. It’s just literally impossible.”

The Liberal Democrats criticised the plans for mass deportations, saying they risked “ripping up” human rights and potentially paying autocratic regimes to take people back.

Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper said: “Of course Nigel Farage wants to follow his idol Vladimir Putin in ripping up the human rights convention. Winston Churchill would be turning in his grave. Doing so would only make it harder for each of us as individuals to hold the government to account and stop it trampling on our freedoms.”

Green Party MP Ellie Chowns accused Mr Farage of “inflammatory rhetoric” and accused him of “whipping up anger, hatred and even disorder”.

“The policy proposals themselves are unworkable. They rely on ripping up swathes of international law and would likely face many legal obstacles in the UK courts that could use British common law to block such cruelty.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Bitpanda rules out London IPO over liquidity concerns: Report

Published

on

By

Bitpanda rules out London IPO over liquidity concerns: Report

Bitpanda rules out London IPO over liquidity concerns: Report

Vienna-based Bitpanda is eyeing Frankfurt or New York for a future listing, with its co-founder warning that London’s IPO market is too illiquid to attract investors.

Continue Reading

Trending