A senior Labour MP has said the government needs to take “corrective action” over planned disability benefit cuts – as Sir Keir Starmer faces a growing backbench rebellion.
Tan Dhesi, chair of the influential Commons defence committee, told the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge the “disappointing” local election results show the government must listen and learn, particularly over welfare reforms.
The government has proposed tightening the eligibility requirements for the personal independent payment, known as PIP.
A claimant must score a minimum of four points on one PIP daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit.
Mr Dhesi, the MP for Slough, said “corrective action” needs to be taken but insisted if the government changed tact, it would not be a U-turn as the disability cuts were only proposals.
Image: Tan Dhesi spoke to Sky’s Sophy Ridge
“A government which is in listening mode should be looking at what the electorate is saying,” he said.
“And we need to make sure that it’s our moral duty, responsibility, to look after the most vulnerable within our community, whether that’s in Slough, whether that’s elsewhere across the country.
“So, I hope that the government will be taking on board that feedback and many of us as MPs are giving that feedback in various meetings happening here in Westminster and then we need to take corrective action.”
Image: Alex Davies-Jones said the government was seeking to ‘protect the vulnerable’
Minister Alex Davies-Jones told the Politics Hub a Labour government “will always seek to protect the most vulnerable” and it wants to “listen to people who have got real lived experience”.
She added she has the “utmost respect for Tan, he’s a great constituency MP and he’s doing exactly what he should be doing, is representing his constituency”.
Sir Keir is facing a rebellion from Labour MPs, with about 40 in the Red Wall – Labour’s traditional heartlands in the north of England – reposting a statement on social media in which they said the leadership’s response to the local elections had “fallen on deaf ears”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
8:27
Starmer defends winter fuel cuts
Several backbench Labour MPs also spoke out against the plans during a debate on PIP and disabled people in parliament on Wednesday.
Ian Byrne, MP for Liverpool West Derby, said he would “swim through vomit to vote against” the proposed changes and said: “This is not what the Labour Party was formed to do.”
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, said she feared tightening PIP eligibility would cause deaths, adding: “Lest we forget that study that attributed 330,000 excess deaths in Britain between 2012 and 2019 to the last round of austerity cuts [under the Conservative government].”
Diane Abbott, the longest-serving female MP, accused the government of putting forward “contradictory arguments”.
“On the one hand, they insist they are helping the disabled by putting them back to work,” she said.
“But on the other hand, they say this cut will save £9bn. Well, you can’t do both.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:23
‘I’ll struggle if I lose disability support’
However, fellow Labour MP David Pinto-Duschinsky, said MPs cannot “ignore this issue” of health-related benefit claimant figures rising at “twice the rate of underlying health conditions”.
Responding for the government, social security minister Sir Stephen Timms said PIP claims were set to “more than double, from two million to over 4.3 million this decade”.
“It would certainly not be in the interests of people currently claiming the benefits for the government to bury its head in the sand over that rate of increase,” he added.
Dubai’s regulator announced it had issued financial penalties against 19 companies related to digital asset activities amid approval for BitGo’s MENA entity.
Her personal poll rating, minus 47, is worse than the lowest ebb of Iain Duncan Smith’s fated leadership and worse than when Boris Johnson resigned.
To rub salt into the wounds, a Sky News/YouGov poll this week found that the majority of Tory members think Robert Jenrick should be the leader, while half don’t think she should lead them into the next general election.
Being leader of the Opposition is often described as the hardest job in politics, but for Badenoch, with Reform stealing the march as the party of the right, it looks pretty much impossible.
For someone who needs to try to win people over, Badenoch has a curious style. She likes to be known as a leader who isn’t afraid of a fight and, at times, she approached our interview at the Conservative Party conference as if she was positively looking for one.
More on Kemi Badenoch
Related Topics:
A few times in our interview when I asked her a question she didn’t like, or didn’t want to answer (it is my job to ask all politicians hard questions), she seemed tetchy.
And when I deigned to ask her whether she admired Nigel Farage, she criticised me for asking the question. She asked why I was not asking her if I admire Sir Keir Starmer or Sir Ed Davey.
Her approach surprised me, as I had asked the prime minister exactly the same question a week before. He’d answered it directly, without arguing over why I had asked it: “I think he is a formidable politician,” said Sir Keir.
Badenoch told me she didn’t understand the question, and then told me she wasn’t interested in talking about him. It made for an awkward, ill-tempered exchange.
The facts remain that Farage is topping the polls, helped by Labour’s collapsing support and the Conservatives’ deep unpopularity.
And in the run-up to our interview, Reform drip-fed the news that 20 Tory councillors were defecting to Farage’s party.
There is open talk in Badenoch’s party about whether the Tories will need to try to come to some sort of agreement with Reform at the next election to try to see off Labour and ‘progressive parties’.
Farage says absolutely not, as does Badenoch – but many in her party do not think she has that luxury.
Andrew Rosindell, MP for Romford, told GB Newshe’ll lose his seat unless the two sides “work together” and said the right must unite to defeat the left. Arch-rival Robert Jenrick pointedly refuses to rule it out, saying only it’s “not the priority”. Meanwhile, party members support an electoral pact by two to one, according to our Sky News poll.
On the matter of whether these MPs, and party members, have a point, Badenoch bristled: “It is important that people know what we stand for. Robert Jenrick is not the leader of the Conservative Party, neither is Andrew Rossindell. I am the leader of the party and we are not having a coalition or a pact with Reform.”
When I ask colleagues if they think Badenoch is too aloof, too argumentative, too abrasive to lead this rebuild, the popular refrain for her supporters is that she is “a work in progress” and that it would be madness to change the leader again.
The question is, will she be given the time to develop? The plot to oust her is active and much of the chatter around this conference is whether she might be challenged before or after the May local elections.
There are some colleagues who believe it is better to give her more time to turn things around and, if May is truly dreadful and the party goes further backwards, remove her then.
Ahead of conference, when asked by Tim Shipman of the Spectator whether she would resign if the Conservatives go backwards in May, she said rather cryptically “ask me after the locals”.
When I asked Badenoch why she said that she replied, “let’s see what the election result is about”.
When I explained that it sounded rather like she might throw in the towel after next May and so was seeking clarification, she told me that I was asking irrelevant questions.
“Your viewers want to know how their lives are going to be better. Not be inside the Westminster bubble politics of who’s up, who’s down… It’s part of the reason why the country is in this mess. Perhaps if people had scrutinised Labour’s policies instead of looking at just poll ratings, they would be running the country better.”
But Tories are looking at poll ratings and there is a view from some in the party that if the Tories wait until another drubbing in the May local, Scottish and Welsh elections, there might not be much of a party apparatus left to rebuild from.
Image: More than half of Tory members want pact with Reform
In short, there is not a settled view on when a challenge might come, but with the party in the position it is in, talk of a challenge will not go away.
Badenoch wants to make the case that her “authentic conservatism” is worth sticking with and that the policies the Conservatives are announcing will give them a pathway back.
On borders, the Tories are trying to neutralise Reform with a very similar offer. On the economy and welfare cuts, they hope they can beat Labour and Reform.
But really, the question about this party and this leader is about relevance. The prime minister didn’t even bother to name check Badenoch in his conference speech, while Davey trained his guns on Farage rather than his traditional Tory rival.
Badenoch may not like being asked about Reform, might – in her words – not be interested in Reform, but her former voters, and the country, are. The enormous challenge for her in the coming months is to see if she can get them to look at her.