Connect with us

Published

on

On the politics, this is a win for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves. And a big one: just at the point he really needed it after terrible local elections and few signs the economy is going the right way.

For months, the prime minister has been doubling down on a chunky bet – that there were more benefits than costs to hug close Donald Trump, the most technicolour, unpredictable and contentious political figure of the modern era.

There have been moments when this gambit felt like a mistake, when tariffs were first imposed and not subsequently reduced for the UK and, separately, as a deal over Ukraine slid in the wrong direction.

This is also a win when it comes to timing. Not only have we beaten nations like Japan, which had reportedly been further up the queue, but this deal comes before the May 19 reset with the EU, which has always risked setting back British relations with the White House if Mr Trump took exception to strengthening ties to a bloc he regularly attacks.

But at 3pm today, when Mr Trump makes his announcement that the UK is the “big and highly respected country” to get the first trade deal of his second presidency, he will be able to claim this has paid off.

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

It is a “substantial” deal, I’m told. Even if we only hear the heads of terms today, it will allow the prime minister to say he has saved jobs – an important boast at this uncertain juncture.

Read more from Sky News:
India will ‘pay price’ for strikes, Pakistan warns
Iran rejects involvement in alleged embassy plot
Man charged with stalking Jennifer Aniston

The extent of the economic win will still have to be weighed up.

The question is: how much will it deliver and how much will it help?

The big question is how much it will be to help the (newly state-run) UK steel industry and the (fragile) UK car industry, which faces 25% tariffs for goods going to the US. Will they now be set at 10% or zero?

Another big question is whether the 10% tariffs on everything else heading to the UK will be reduced to zero – something government sources were playing down just a fortnight ago.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What could a US-UK trade deal mean for industry?

Then there’s the question of what we have given in return – for the Trump White House surely will have demanded a hard bargain.

Ministers were not denying they would allow cuts to the digital services tax – a bung for billionaire owners of companies like Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, which owns Facebook, at a time when taxes are going up and benefits are going down in the UK.

Meanwhile, some UK sectors are likely to face additional competition – quotas of US food products are likely to be increased, even if food standards will not be lowered.

This is a win for patient diplomacy and for the Starmer approach to the White House over the EU shouting. He will enjoy the moment.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto to become UAE’s second-biggest sector in 5 years — Institutional investor

Published

on

By

Crypto to become UAE’s second-biggest sector in 5 years — Institutional investor

Crypto to become UAE’s second-biggest sector in 5 years — Institutional investor

The crypto industry is set to experience massive growth in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) due to its pro-tech and business regulations.

Continue Reading

Politics

Blockchain security must localize to stop Asia’s crypto crime wave

Published

on

By

Blockchain security must localize to stop Asia’s crypto crime wave

Blockchain security must localize to stop Asia’s crypto crime wave

Without localized risk detection and public–private cooperation, illicit capital will continue to flow unchecked, and trust in the system will collapse.

Continue Reading

Politics

Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach, ministers say

Published

on

By

Thousands more Afghans affected by second data breach, ministers say

Thousands more Afghan nationals may have been affected by another data breach, the government has said.

Up to 3,700 Afghans brought to the UK between January and March 2024 have potentially been impacted as names, passport details and information from the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy has been compromised again, this time by a breach on a third party supplier used by the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

This was not an attack directly on the government but a cyber security incident on a sub-contractor named Inflite – The Jet Centre – an MoD supplier that provides ground handling services for flights at London Stansted Airport.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

July: UK spies exposed in Afghan data breach

The flights were used to bring Afghans to the UK, travel to routine military exercises, and official engagements. It was also used to fly British troops and government officials.

Those involved were informed of it on Friday afternoon by the MoD, marking the second time information about Afghan nationals relocated to the UK has been compromised.

It is understood former Tory ministers are also affected by the hack.

Earlier this year, it emerged that almost 7,000 Afghan nationals would have to be relocated to the UK following a massive data breach by the British military that successive governments tried to keep secret with a super-injunction.

Defence Secretary John Healey offered a “sincere apology” for the first data breach in a statement to the House of Commons, saying he was “deeply concerned about the lack of transparency” around the data breach, adding: “No government wishes to withhold information from the British public, from parliamentarians or the press in this manner.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

July: Afghan interpreter ‘betrayed’ by UK govt

The previous Conservative government set up a secret scheme in 2023 to relocate Afghan nationals impacted by the data breach, but who were not eligible for an existing programme to relocate and help people who had worked for the British government in Afghanistan.

The mistake exposed personal details of close to 20,000 individuals, endangering them and their families, with as many as 100,000 people impacted in total.

Read more on Sky News:
Data breach victims sent spam emails
Afghan data leak timeline
MoD urged to reveal details of nuclear incident

A government spokesperson said of Friday’s latest breach: “We were recently notified that a third party sub-contractor to a supplier experienced a cyber security incident involving unauthorised access to a small number of its emails that contained basic personal information.

“We take data security extremely seriously and are going above and beyond our legal duties in informing all potentially affected individuals. The incident has not posed any threat to individuals’ safety, nor compromised any government systems.”

In a statement, Inflite – The Jet Centre confirmed the “data security incident” involving “unauthorised access to a limited number of company emails”.

“We have reported the incident to the Information Commissioner’s Office and have been actively working with the relevant UK cyber authorities, including the National Crime Agency and the National Cyber Security Centre, to support our investigation and response,” it said.

“We believe the scope of the incident was limited to email accounts only, however, as a precautionary measure, we have contacted our key stakeholders whose data may have been affected during the period of January to March 2024.”

Continue Reading

Trending