Connect with us

Published

on

On the politics, this is a win for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves. And a big one: just at the point he really needed it after terrible local elections and few signs the economy is going the right way.

For months, the prime minister has been doubling down on a chunky bet – that there were more benefits than costs to hug close Donald Trump, the most technicolour, unpredictable and contentious political figure of the modern era.

There have been moments when this gambit felt like a mistake, when tariffs were first imposed and not subsequently reduced for the UK and, separately, as a deal over Ukraine slid in the wrong direction.

This is also a win when it comes to timing. Not only have we beaten nations like Japan, which had reportedly been further up the queue, but this deal comes before the May 19 reset with the EU, which has always risked setting back British relations with the White House if Mr Trump took exception to strengthening ties to a bloc he regularly attacks.

But at 3pm today, when Mr Trump makes his announcement that the UK is the “big and highly respected country” to get the first trade deal of his second presidency, he will be able to claim this has paid off.

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

It is a “substantial” deal, I’m told. Even if we only hear the heads of terms today, it will allow the prime minister to say he has saved jobs – an important boast at this uncertain juncture.

Read more from Sky News:
India will ‘pay price’ for strikes, Pakistan warns
Iran rejects involvement in alleged embassy plot
Man charged with stalking Jennifer Aniston

The extent of the economic win will still have to be weighed up.

The question is: how much will it deliver and how much will it help?

The big question is how much it will be to help the (newly state-run) UK steel industry and the (fragile) UK car industry, which faces 25% tariffs for goods going to the US. Will they now be set at 10% or zero?

Another big question is whether the 10% tariffs on everything else heading to the UK will be reduced to zero – something government sources were playing down just a fortnight ago.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What could a US-UK trade deal mean for industry?

Then there’s the question of what we have given in return – for the Trump White House surely will have demanded a hard bargain.

Ministers were not denying they would allow cuts to the digital services tax – a bung for billionaire owners of companies like Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, which owns Facebook, at a time when taxes are going up and benefits are going down in the UK.

Meanwhile, some UK sectors are likely to face additional competition – quotas of US food products are likely to be increased, even if food standards will not be lowered.

This is a win for patient diplomacy and for the Starmer approach to the White House over the EU shouting. He will enjoy the moment.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves signals she will break tax pledges – and gives strongest indication she will lift two-child cap

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves signals she will break tax pledges - and gives strongest indication she will lift two-child cap

Rachel Reeves has signalled she is going to break her manifesto tax pledges at the budget – and has given her strongest indication yet she will lift the two-child benefit cap.

The chancellor said the world has changed in the year since the last budget, when she reiterated Labour’s manifesto promise not to raise national insurance, VAT or income tax on “working people”.

“It would, of course, be possible to stick with the manifesto commitments, but that would require things like deep cuts in capital spending,” she told BBC 5Live.

“I have been very clear that we are looking at both taxes and spending,” she added.

Politics latest: Second deported migrant returns

The chancellor also gave her strongest indication yet she will lift the two-child benefit cap at the budget on 26 November, saying it is not right a child is “penalised because they are in a bigger family”.

Ms Reeves blamed poor productivity and growth over the last few years on the previous government “always taking the easy option to cut investment in rail and road projects, in energy projects and digital infrastructure”.

More from Politics

She said she promised during the election campaign to “bring stability back to our economy”.

Ms Reeves, here with US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in London in September, blamed tariffs for poor growth. Pic: PA
Image:
Ms Reeves, here with US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in London in September, blamed tariffs for poor growth. Pic: PA

‘I’ll always do what’s right for UK’

“What I can promise now is I will always do what I think is right for our country, not the easy choice, but the thing that I think is necessary,” she added.

The chancellor blamed the UK’s lack of growth under her tenure on global conflicts, trade and tariffs over the past year.

In a dig at Donald Trump, who has imposed wide-ranging tariffs on countries around the world, she said: “The tariffs. I don’t think anyone could have foreseen when this government was elected last year that we were going to see these big increases in global tariffs and barriers to trade.

“And I have to be chancellor in the world as it is not necessarily the world as I would like it to be. But I have to respond to those challenges, and that’s the responsible thing to do.”

Read more:
What tax rises and spending cuts will Reeves announce at budget?
Gordon Brown ‘confident’ of two-child benefit cap change

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Shameful’ that 4.5m children in poverty

‘Children should not be penalised’

The government has, so far, resisted lifting the two-child benefit cap, which means a family can only claim child benefits for the first two children.

But, it is a contentious subject within Labour, with seven of its MPs suspended two weeks after the election for voting to scrap it, while others are aware it will cost £2.8bn to do so.

Former Labour prime minister and chancellor Gordon Brown has been pushing for Ms Reeves, who says he is her hero, to lift it.

She said she saw Mr Brown at Remembrance Sunday, where they “had a good chat and we’ve emailed each other just today”, as she revealed they speak regularly.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour’s child benefit cap dilemma

Ms Reeves added Mr Brown and Sir Tony Blair were big heroes of hers because they did so much to lift children out of poverty – the reason she went into politics.

Pushed on whether she would lift the cap, she said: “I don’t think that it’s right that a child is penalised because they are in a bigger family, through no fault of their own. So we will take action on child poverty.”

Mr Brown earlier told Sky News’ Mornings with Ridge and Frost he was “confident” of a two-child benefit cap change at the budget.

The latest YouGov polling found 59% of the public are in favour of keeping the cap in place, and only 26% thought it should be abolished.

Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: “Rachel Reeves has borrowed, spent and taxed like there’s no tomorrow – and she’s coming back for more because she doesn’t have a plan or the strength to stand up to Labour’s backbenchers, who are now calling the shots.

“My message is clear: if Rachel Reeves reduces government spending – including the welfare bill, she doesn’t need to raise taxes again. “

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate Committee unveils crypto market structure bill draft

Published

on

By

Senate Committee unveils crypto market structure bill draft

The US Senate Agriculture Committee has released its long-awaited discussion draft of crypto market structure laws, bringing Congress closer to passing legislation outlining how the crypto sector will be regulated.

Republican Agriculture Chair John Boozman and Democrat Senator Cory Booker released the draft on Monday, which includes brackets around sections of the bill that lawmakers are still negotiating.

The bill aims to outline the limits of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s power to regulate crypto. Only Congress can set the agencies’ regulatory boundaries, but both have shared guidance to companies about crypto under the Trump administration’s deregulation push.

“The CFTC is the right agency to regulate spot digital commodity trading, and it is essential to establish clear rules for the emerging crypto market while also protecting consumers,”  Boozman said.

Related: End to US gov’t shutdown sparks institutional buying, ETF ‘floodgate’ hopes

Booker said the discussion draft “would provide the CFTC with new authority to regulate the digital commodity spot market, create new protections for retail customers, and ensure the agency has the personnel and resources necessary to oversee this growing market.”

The House passed a similar bill, called the CLARITY Act, to the Senate in July, which would give the CFTC a central role in regulating crypto.

Magazine: EU’s privacy-killing Chat Control bill delayed — but fight isn’t over