Connect with us

Published

on

As perhaps one of the most prolific electric bike reviewers on the internet, I spend a lot of time riding city streets and have occasionally wondered if this is the way I’ll go out one day. Yesterday, I nearly had the answer to that question as a police cruiser almost smeared me across three lanes of traffic.

It happened to occur while I was in the middle of filming a review of a Velotric Breeze 1 electric bike. With the rare opportunity of catching a moment like that on camera, it turned into a chance for me to take a second look at what I did right as well as what I might have done wrong to wind up in that situation.

And why keep that kind of analysis to myself? Come along with me while I Monday morning quarterback myself.

An uncomfortably close perspective on bike safety

As cyclists, we’re probably the most vulnerable road users out there. Out of necessity, that liability gives us a unique perspective – one that is even more well-rounded if you happen to also drive a car from time to time.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

In fact, an hour before I got an uncomfortably close view of a police cruiser’s grille, I was driving my family’s borrowed minivan, and only an hour afterward, I was going 0 to 60 in three seconds on my LiveWire electric motorcycle, so I’d consider myself a fairly holistic road user.

When I’m riding my electric bicycles in the bike lane, especially the unprotected bike lanes that are merely a strip of paint laid down on the shoulder of a busy road, I’m constantly scanning for threats. As you can see in the video below, that gave me around 1-2 seconds of warning as I saw a police cruiser accelerating hard as he prepared to blow past a stop sign to cross three empty lanes of a major road. The only problem was that there was a fourth lane there – a bicycle lane – and it was very occupied, by me.

See what I mean in the video below.

What happened?

Basically, the police cruiser appeared to be in quite a rush. The officer didn’t have the lights or siren on, so I’m not sure if it was official, but the car was booking it. I first heard the engine winding up before even seeing the car, and it was obvious he wasn’t preparing to stop, despite the stop sign at the end of the crossroad.

As soon as I heard the engine and turned my head to clock the car’s trajectory, I was on the brakes. The Velotric Breeze 1 electric bike I was riding has what I can now confirm are excellent hydraulic brakes and I immediately started slowing down. A fraction of a second later, the cop appeared to see me panic braking and started his own panic braking, sliding his cruiser across the stop line and halfway through the pedestrian crosswalk lines.

Once I saw his brake dive and could see he was going to be able to stop in time, I let off my own brakes to continue down the bike lane and not dangerously slide to a stop myself. I had a few choice words but figured I’d be better advised not to confront the cop lest I get hit with some sort of “attempted to damage government property with his formerly intact femur” charge.

I understand that the video above might not look as intense as it felt, but let me assure you that seeing 5,000 pounds of police car skidding towards you on a bicycle will have you leaving your own skidmark of sorts.

What went right… and wrong?

It’s important to remember that this kind of thing happens to countless cyclists every single day. As a bike reviewer, I was merely lucky to have a 360º camera recording during it and the privilege of having a platform to share it on. So why not take the opportunity to make the most of this and learn something useful from the situation?

First of all, let’s look at what went wrong. While this is mostly the fault of the cop, I’m not off the hook here, either.

The main issue here is that the cop was driving recklessly on a side road and intending to blow a stop sign before cutting across three lanes of traffic onto a major road, all while obviously not watching very closely for traffic. Now if he had been responding to a call, that would have been one thing. Police officers aren’t beholden to certain traffic laws and are allowed to disregard things like speed limits and stop signs when responding to an emergency call. However, that’s exactly why they have sirens and lights, to alert other road users. In this case, the cop either wasn’t responding to a call or didn’t turn on his lights or sirens. The fact that he still didn’t turn on his lights or siren even after nearly pancaking me means he probably wasn’t responding to a call, and was just gunning it down a side street because he could.

The second issue is poor road design. Not only was the cop at a disadvantage due to the relatively tall shrubs and retail signs on the side street that could limit a driver’s view of oncoming traffic on the main road, but the bicycle lane I was using was the worst kind: just a strip of paint on the shoulder. There’s no protective border, no green paint as a reminder to drivers, and no clear visual separation at intersections where conflicts are most likely to occur. The cop should still be looking for road users, including cyclists, but the road design didn’t make that any easier.

The last issue, which is on me, is that I was wearing dark colors and not highly visible. Black shirt, dark pants, black helmet – nothing that jumps out and says “look at me.” Now, I’m not a fan of the argument that cyclists should wear high-vis clothing because it smacks of the same kind of victim-blaming thought process brought to you by the folks who use “sure, he shouldn’t have assaulted her behind that bar, but did you see what she was wearing?”. So I could have been more visible, and shoutout to Velotric for offering lots of bright bike colors, but I shouldn’t have to wear a bright yellow vest in order for drivers to not kill me.

Ok, now let’s look at what went right. First of all, I know that I always have to be aware of my surroundings when I’m on a bike. When I ride, I don’t wear headphones and I don’t talk on the phone. My eyes are always scanning and I’m always listening for threats. In this case, I was talking to the camera while filming a review, but you can see I’m still looking around during it and I immediately heard the cop car’s engine accelerating hard as he prepared to swing out onto the road. That meant I could get on the brakes before he even knew I was there. Fortunately, I didn’t have to test the following theory since he saw me at the last minute and also slammed on his brakes, but I believe I could have stopped just short of the side street with my full-on emergency braking. Again, props to Velotric for using good hydraulic brakes on the Breeze 1 e-bike. So that part went well – always be aware of your surroundings and never needlessly mute one of your important senses like sight or hearing.

Next, I was riding at appropriate speeds for the conditions. That bike can do 28 mph (45 km/h) easily, and I enjoy going that fast on long straightaways and in areas where conditions allow. But as you can see from the video, there’s a cross street or retail parking lot entrance just about every few seconds and there are simply too many chances for something like this to happen. I was doing closer to 15-20 mph in this area due to the high number of intersections, which meant that I had more time to react when I detected the threat. At full Class 3 speeds of 28 mph, there’s no way I would have been able to brake in time and I would have been completely reliant on the cop not running that stop sign. Don’t get me wrong, I love going fast and I do it often. But I also slow down when conditions suggest it, and today, that paid off.

And lastly, as I mentioned above, the bike I was riding is an eye-catching bright blue color. In fact, only a few minutes earlier, another cyclist stopped me to tell me how much he loved the color. I truly think that when the cop did finally see me, he probably saw the bright blue bike before he actually saw me. I’ve long advocated for brightly colored e-bikes, partly because of my disdain for suggesting that cyclists should be forced to wear bright-colored clothing for their own protection. Personally, I like fun and bright-colored e-bikes, but I also accept that they help make us more visible regardless of the outfit we choose to wear that day. I’ll also point out that I was also wearing a decent bicycle helmet with a properly adjusted chin strap. It’s been a while since I’ve actually put helmet to pavement, but in the couple of times I’ve crashed over the last decade or so, I’ve been glad it was there.

The moral of the story, if there is one, is that hypervigilance is important for cyclists, and even more important for drivers. If you operate a vehicle that exposes you to the risks of the road, you have to watch out for yourself. And if you operate a vehicle that exposes everyone else to the risk of your vehicle, then the responsibility sits even heavier upon you.

Even ignoring the fact that, in this case, it was the very people we expect to keep our roads safe that ultimately caused the greatest danger, all car drivers simply must do a better job watching for all road users, and that includes the most vulnerable, such as cyclists and motorcyclists.

And as vulnerable road users ourselves, those of us who opt for two wheels must remember that among the few people who actually read my previous sentence, almost none will heed it, and that means we are the only ones we can count on to truly protect ourselves.

Perhaps one day more cities will have better ways to physically separate cyclists from cars through the use of improved road infrastructure and protected cycling lanes. Until then, we’ll have to rely on our eyes, our ears, and our helmets.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Kia built an electric van for wheelchair users: Check out the new PV5 WAV

Published

on

By

Kia built an electric van for wheelchair users: Check out the new PV5 WAV

Kia’s first electric van is proving to be even more functional. The new PV5 WAV is specifically designed to be affordable, accessible, and wheelchair-friendly. Meet the new Kia PV5 WAV.

Meet the Kia PV5 WAV electric van

The PV5 is a fully electric midsize van. It’s the first of many from Kia’s new Platform Beyond Vehicle (PBV) business.

Kia promised its PBVs would go “Beyond Mobility,” and the company is proving it. On Tuesday, Kia unveiled the new PV5 WAV, calling it “a new era for wheelchair accessible electric vehicles.”

The PV5 is the perfect electric van for the task. Based on its new E-GMP.S EV platform, it has a flat floor design and extended wheelbase, unlocking more interior space.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Kia designed the electric van not only for wheelchair users but also for their families, caregivers, and drivers. The PV5 WAV features a custom side-entry system to make it easier to get in and out of. An adjustable third-row seat enables users to assist from the side.

It will also feature a specially developed wheelchair belt fastener and entry ramp that can handle up to 661 lbs (300 kg).

According to Kia, the PV5 will include all necessary equipment for individuals with disabilities, based on the AAOS open software platform.

Kia-PV5-WAV-EV-van
Kia PV5 WAV electric van interior (Source: Kia)

The new electric van variant will be built alongside other PV5 models at Kia’s Hwaseong EVO Plant in Korea. Kia opened PV5 Passenger pre-orders (shown below) in the UK on May 1, starting at £32,995, or about $44,000. It will launch in Europe and Korea later this year, followed by other global markets in 2026.

Kia’s Passenger electric van is offered with two battery options: 51.5 kWh or 71.2 kWh, good for up to 179 miles or 249 miles of WLTP driving range.

After partnering with Motability Operations in February, Kia said, “users receiving a disability allowance can choose an affordable and accessible vehicle.”

The PV5 WAV will initially launch in the UK, but Kia plans to expand sales to other global regions. A larger PV7 van will arrive in 2027, followed by the PV9 in 2029. Kia will continue launching new electric variants and use cases. By 2030, the company aims to sell 250,000 electric vans as it taps into a new market.

Last month, at the 2025 Seoul Mobility Show, Kia and LG Electronics unveiled two new “Speilraum” PV5 electric van concepts for camping and other fun uses. What’s next?

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

GOP proposes sending US EV jobs to China, giving money to elites instead

Published

on

By

GOP proposes sending US EV jobs to China, giving money to elites instead

US republicans have unveiled their new tax proposal, which kills a slew of tax credits to help working families become more energy efficient, improve US air quality, and boost US manufacturing. The republican proposal instead channels that money to wealthy elites, increasing the deficit by trillions of dollars along the way.

Republicans in Congress released their 389-page proposal today and, as expected, it includes several provisions to eliminate popular clean energy credits which were driving a boost in American manufacturing.

The credits were largely established under President Biden as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, which raised hundreds of billions of dollars through tax enforcement on wealthy individuals and corporations and channeled that into energy efficiency credits for American families.

We’ve covered how families could save thousands of dollars on upgrades to lower their energy costs through these credits.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

But these credits aren’t just money-saving for Americans, they also work to boost American manufacturing.

Due to various provisions in the bill, particularly around the $7,500 EV tax credit which was limited to cars that undergo final assembly in North America. While loopholes exist, nevertheless the bill resulted in a massive expansion of American manufacturing, driving hundreds of billions of dollars of investment and creating hundreds of thousands of jobs.

But now, republicans in Congress are trying to roll much of that progress back.

Here’s a life of the bill’s various effects (via the BlueGreen Alliance):

  • Attaching restrictions to clean energy and manufacturing tax credits that would make them unusable in practical terms while also “sunsetting” those tax credits early, a move that research suggests will increase costs for American families; 
  • Repealing the Clean Vehicle Tax Credits; 
  • Repealing the Clean Hydrogen Tax Credit; 
  • Clawing back unspent funds for air quality monitoring in schools, clean manufacturing, state and community energy programs, and electric grid upgrades; 
  • Defunding and delaying the Methane Emissions Reduction Program (MERP), which reduces pollution and protects the health of workers and communities; 
  • Clawing back all unspent Inflation Reduction Act funds, including many provisions that would have lowered energy bills, created jobs, and reduced pollution; and 
  • Attacks on many additional Inflation Reduction Act programs and initiatives.   

You can perhaps see a pattern in these effects: they’re primarily targeted towards increasing costs for regular American families who were taking advantage of these tax credits, and towards programs that would keep you and your children healthier.

Previous analyses show how repealing these tax credits would lead to increased electricity prices for all Americans.

It should not be any surprise to anyone that has been paying attention that republicans want to poison you and raise your costs, but some people apparently still need more examples, so here we are.

In particular, the new tax proposal eliminates the US EV tax credit which had driven so much of that investment due to its domestic manufacturing provision (though there are some small carveouts). Not only does that inflate the cost of the best vehicles available today for Americans, it also takes away one of the incentives that was driving investment in US manufacturing.

We’ve warned before that a bill like this would just send more EV jobs to China, a country where nobody is “debating” over which direction the auto industry is going. Chinese automakers all know the industry is going electric, and they’re putting all of their effort into it.

This is quite a contrast with Western automakers which keep hemming and hawing, begging their governments to let them go bankrupt with anti-EV policy decisions that will only slow down their transition towards modernizing to the global EV status quo.

We’ve already seen the effects of other poor policy decisions on manufacturing, with several companies pausing or canceling plans to build manufacturing facilities in North America as a result of tariff chaos at the hands of an ignoramus. Republican districts have been hit hardest, as they were where the majority of this investment had been going.

And we’ve seen it made clear that the republicans in government responsible for protecting clean air would rather poison you and raise your fuel costs, as long as it helps the oil industry which bribed them into their position.

But then, the cherry on top of today’s tax proposal is that its cuts of these credits don’t even have a greater budgetary purpose. Not only was the Inflation Reduction Act revenue-positive – which is to say, it raised more money than it spent, thus reducing the deficit – today’s republican tax bill is revenue-negative, which is to say, it will increase the deficit.

The republican proposal raises the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, and it makes use of virtually all of that headroom, as the Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated that it will add $3.7 trillion to US debt. This is largely due to the bill’s significant giveaways to wealthy elites, with the majority of tax cuts targeted at the wealthiest households.

So the government isn’t even getting any savings out of this bill, merely channeling more money from working families to the wealthy elites that the republican party has always tried to benefit (including in other ways than the clean energy credits, like by cutting health care for the poor).

If you have a republican representative, all it takes is 3 republican Congresspeople to oppose this job-killing bill and to stand up for the well-being of their constituents.

Solar industry analysts have identified four republican Congresspeople who might be swayed in this respect, with their contact info below (Find out more about how this will affect the solar tax credit in this article by Electrek’s Michelle Lewis)

But there are many others whose districts have received significant investment, with EV projects being particularly popular in states like Georgia, North Carolina, and others along the burgeoning US “battery belt”. An interactive tool, including the ability to sort by congressional district, is available here.

Otherwise, you can find your representative on Congress’ website, and then search for the contact form on your representative’s website to get in contact with them.

Of course, if you have a Democratic representative, it’s also worth letting them know that you oppose the tax bill, just in case a few of them decide to jump ranks and join the republicans in harming America. We certainly hope they don’t, but it could happen.


Among the proposed cuts is the rooftop solar credit. That means you could have only until the end of this year to install rooftop solar on your home, before republicans raise the cost of doing so by an average of ~$10,000. So if you want to go solar, get started now.

To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – ad*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

The House draft budget kills the 30% residential solar tax credit

Published

on

By

The House draft budget kills the 30% residential solar tax credit

The House’s “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” (yes, it’s really called that) has set an accelerated expiration date of December 31, 2025, for the 30% residential solar tax credit – nearly a decade ahead of its originally planned end date.

Is this the end of the residential solar tax credit?

The point of this giant bill is to extend the expiring Trump-era tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which would cost around $4 trillion over the next decade.

The Republican-majority House Ways and Means Committee proposes terminating section 25D on page 221, which would kill residential solar tax credits at the end of this year, almost a decade ahead of its original end date of December 31, 2034.

(Utility-scale solar’s tax credits remain in place through 2028 before a phase-down to 80% in 2029, 60% in 2030, 40% in 2031, and zero in 2032. That’s earlier than what’s currently law.)

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The original plan included a gradual reduction in residential solar tax credits; this new compressed timeframe leaves no time for the solar industry to prepare. “If Congress eliminates the ITC without a reasonable phase-down, that’s obviously going to cause immediate disruption within the solar industry,” Aaron Nichols with Exact Solar told EnergySage. 

The tax credit is known as the Investment Tax Credit (ITC), and it provides homeowners with a tax credit of 30% of the full cost of their residential solar installation. It was part of the Biden administration’s flagship Inflation Reduction Act.

The House Ways and Means Committee will mark up and then vote on the bill today, and then it will be sent to the entire House of Representatives. It will then be sent to the Senate, which has until July 4 to amend, reject, or pass the bill. 

The bill also proposes that the EV and energy efficiency tax credits be killed.

Electrek’s Take

It’s not hyperbole to say that this would be one of the worst decisions the Republican Party would ever make for the US economy. Nothing about this makes America great.

That’s why Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) released a statement yesterday saying that “at a time when billions of dollars are being invested in states that overwhelmingly voted for President Trump, this proposed legislation will effectively dismantle the most successful industrial onshoring effort in US history.”

And Charlie Hadlow, president and COO of EnergySage, told Electrek that “eliminating the 25D tax credit would be a step backward for American families and small businesses. President Trump has emphasized the need for more domestic energy sources, not fewer, and this credit plays a key role in expanding access to reliable, affordable, homegrown power.”

If this reckless proposal to kill the 30% residential solar tax credit passes, it’s going to raise homeowners’ energy bills, kill jobs, kneecap the solar industry, and hurt small businesses. It will be more of an uphill battle to create a more resilient grid as energy demand skyrockets. It’s going to be much more difficult to compete with China. It makes it harder to reduce emissions (not that Trump’s party cares about that).

Nothing about this budget proposal makes sense. And the thing that makes the least sense is that most of the pain will be felt in red states, where most of the solar industry’s growth is happening.

So, will some Republican lawmakers have the guts to stand up for their constituents? I guess we’ll find out.

Read more: Home solar prices just hit record lows – and storage is even cheaper


If you live in an area that has frequent natural disaster events, and are interested in making your home more resilient to power outages, consider going solar and adding a battery storage system. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –trusted affiliate link*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending