Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer used his first visit to Albania to announce the UK is keen to set up “return hubs” to deport migrants.

Formal discussions are under way, he said, with various countries. We don’t know which these are, but we know which aren’t keen – rather awkwardly, Albania.

Their prime minister, Edi Rama, said he remained “loyal” to their “marriage” with Italy – relations with other countries are “simply love”.

The Conservatives say the trip is therefore an embarrassment for Sir Keir. His team say this was never on the agenda for this trip, which is about joint policing and intelligence sharing.

Politics latest: ‘Moral imperative’ to ensure aid gets to civilians in Gaza, say Tories

First of all, what are return hubs?

Essentially, return hubs are processing centres for people who have exhausted all their options to stay in the UK – including asylum applications, appeals and attempts to claim certain work or study visas.

They will be sent back to their home country, and while that happens, they can go to these return hubs – to prevent them absconding.

Officials said it would also prevent them starting a family, for example, and using that as part of their claim to stay in the UK.

Italy has one already but it’s not used

Giorgia Meloni’s government has been keen on these for some time, and has built two in Albania – at the port of Shengjin, and the village of Gjader – big enough for 36,000 people a year.

But both, which Sky News visited last year, are currently empty. The courts in Rome say they can’t be used until the European Court of Justice rules them safe. A ruling is expected next month.

Although, in a boost to the UK government’s plans, the UN’s refugee agency, has backed the principle of return hubs, if they meet human rights standards.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM confirms ‘return hubs’ plan

Is this like the Rwanda plan?

Spending millions on housing for migrants that then lies empty may sound familiar- but this is different to the Rwanda plan.

Agreed by the Conservatives, Rwanda was scrapped by Sir Keir when Labour won office – he said it was “unethical, unworkable and extortionate”.

The key difference is that under the Rwanda plan, asylum seekers would not be able to claim to stay in the UK – they would be deported and could only apply to stay in Rwanda. This was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court.

Why did Albania say no?

The UK hasn’t always endeared itself to Albania, with comments by former home secretary Suella Braverman about an “invasion” of “Albanian criminals” causing anger here.

David Cameron cut short a much-anticipated visit, as foreign secretary, to just 89 minutes, when the 2024 general election was called – causing offence.

And Mr Rama pointedly talked about the “stigmatising” of Albanians living legally in the UK.

Read more:
Top Tory caught admitting Brexit drawback in leaked clip
NHS waiting list increases for first time in seven months

Andi Hoxhaj, a Balkan expert at Kings’ College London, told me: “The UK just hasn’t put in the work. It’s the first visit by a UK prime minister 103 years after diplomatic relations were established. Starmer and Yvette Cooper understand this and want warmer relations. But it was wishful thinking that a return hub would be agreed.”

So who else might have one?

The government has been concentrating their efforts to “smash the gangs” on the Western Balkans.

The joint enforcement in Albania, has – according to the National Crime Agency – been a model which other countries could follow.

There are likely to be discussions at the European Political Community summit on Friday with countries such as Serbia, North Macedonia and Montenegro to scope out their interest, and the UK is hosting a Western Balkans summit in London in autumn 2025.

So, all is not lost – but there are big legal and logistical hurdles to overcome.

Continue Reading

Politics

The BBC’s billion dollar question

Published

on

By

The BBC's billion dollar question

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

With US President Donald Trump threatening to sue the BBC, how likely is the broadcaster to pay out? And how have those across the political spectrum been reacting?

And with 15 days until Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s budget, Matthew McGregor – the chief executive of campaign group 38 Degrees and a former digital strategist for both Labour and Barack Obama – takes issue with Sam’s take from yesterday and sends in a voice note.

And Sam and Anne discuss the latest twist in the Your Party saga, and it’s all about money.

Continue Reading

Politics

Brazil classifies stablecoin payments as foreign exchange under new rules

Published

on

By

Brazil classifies stablecoin payments as foreign exchange under new rules

Brazil’s central bank completed rules that bring crypto companies under banking-style oversight, classifying stablecoin transactions and certain self-custody wallet transfers as foreign-exchange operations. 

Under Resolutions 519, 520 and 521, published Monday, the Banco Central do Brasil (BCB) established operational standards and authorization procedures for what it calls Sociedades Prestadoras de Serviços de Ativos Virtuais (SPSAVs), a new category of licensed virtual-asset service providers operating in the country. 

The framework extends existing rules on consumer protection, transparency and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) to crypto brokers, custodians and intermediaries. 

The rules will take effect on Feb. 2, 2026, with mandatory reporting for capital-market and cross-border operations set to begin on May 4, 2026.