
Every NHL team’s biggest prospect pipeline need — and the draft prospects who could fill them
More Videos
Published
5 months agoon
By
admin-
Rachel DoerrieMay 15, 2025, 12:37 PM ET
Close- Rachel Doerrie is a professional data consultant specializing in data communication and modelling. She’s worked in the NHL and consulted for professional teams across North American and Europe. She hosts the Staff & Graph Podcast and discusses sports from a data-driven perspective.
With the 2025 NHL draft coming up on June 27 and 28, it is time to evaluate what each team needs.
This is the part where we mention the caveat that teams should never draft for position, and instead should always take the best player available, especially in the first three rounds. Some teams have more pressing positional needs than others but drafting by position or size can lead to significant regret.
Some teams that have been contenders for years (think the Florida Panthers, Tampa Bay Lightning, Vegas Golden Knights) have thinner prospect pools and need everything; they’ve generally been trading away picks and prospects to stay on top. Others who have kept their picks but have not drafted in the top 10 lack high-end skill (Boston Bruins, Pittsburgh Penguins, Edmonton Oilers to name three). Then there are teams that have an abundance of skill at one position but lack elite talent at another.
Only one prospect pool is truly balanced in large part because their scouting mantra over the past five years has been to take the best player available, regardless of position.
What does each team need and who could fill those needs in the upcoming draft?
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd (WPG), 3rd, 3rd (TOR), 4th (DET), 5th, 5th (EDM), 6th, 7th
The Ducks have been the league’s best developer of defenders for more than a decade. There is a long list of defensemen drafted by Anaheim that have become top-four defenders, including Cam Fowler, Sami Vatanen, Shea Theodore, Josh Manson, Hampus Lindholm and Brandon Montour.
More recently, the Ducks have brought along the likes of Jackson LaCombe, Pavel Mintyukov and Olen Zelweger, who have shown legitimate promise in the NHL. However, Anaheim is currently missing a big defenseman with mobility to complement the offensive gifts of their top young defenders. Stian Solberg brings a competitive mean streak and is mobile, but his puck-moving abilities need to develop to NHL level.
Players in the current draft class that fit the mold include Radim Mrtka, Blake Fiddler and Carter Amico.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd (CAR), 2nd (STL), 3rd, 4th (PHI), 5th, 6th, 7th
Up and down the prospect pool, the Bruins need high-end skill. There isn’t a player in the pipeline with the level of skill that projects to be a difference-maker at the NHL level. This will hinder the Bruins as they retool back into being a top contender.
More specifically, the Bruins need a dual-threat center who can create offense through playmaking and be a shooting threat. They need defenders with good puck-moving ability and excellent mobility.
Given the Bruins’ run of success over the last 20 years, it is no surprise that their prospect pool lacks high-end talent. However, they’ve had success with selections outside the top 10, including with David Pastrnak, Charlie McAvoy and Jake DeBrusk. Players who would inject skill into the prospect pool include Roger McQueen, Caleb Desnoyers and Anton Frondell up front, and Sascha Boumedienne and Luka Radivojevic on defense, all of whom could be available for them to select in the upcoming draft at No. 7 overall.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 4th (MIN), 5th, 6th, 7th, 7th (NSH), 7th (WSH)
The Sabres have a deep prospect pool filled with skill. What they are missing — and it isn’t much — is a big forward with skill who can develop into a power forward.
This pipeline has many soft-skill, smaller players like Konsta Helenius, Brody Ziemer, Noah Ostlund and Isak Rosen to add to smaller NHL players like Zach Benson, Jiri Kulich, JJ Peterka and Jack Quinn. Some of those players are two-way forwards who have hard-skill attributes, but none of them are capable of physically imposing themselves.
Buffalo needs a power forward who blends soft and hard skill to win puck battles, and can be a net-front presence and a physical presence in general. Players in the draft class that fit the description include Brady Martin, Porter Martone and Bill Zonnon. If the Sabres favor hard skill over the size, Carter Bear and Viktor Eklund would fit nicely as well.
2025 draft picks: 1st (FLA), 1st (NJ), 2nd (COL), 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th
Calgary picks twice in the first round, with a fantastic opportunity to add a skilled play driver to the prospect pool.
2024 first-rounder Zayne Parekh is the most skilled offensive defenseman outside the NHL, and the Flames have a few other solid prospects like Matvei Gridin and Andrew Basha. They need a skilled, dual-threat forward who can drive offense, as many of their forward prospects are complementary players. Samuel Honzek and Aydar Suniev are excellent examples of skilled forwards who should play complementary roles alongside play drivers.
The aging of their current center group should have the Flames looking forward to adding players at the position, but it isn’t a pressing issue that would force passing on a play-driving winger. There should be plenty of options for the Flames in the draft, including Benjamin Kindel, Carter Bear, Cullen Potter and Cole Reschny.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 3rd (TB), 4th, 6th, 6th (TB), 7th
The Hurricanes have drafted well, and their modus operandi has been adding skill, regardless of position. You will often see the Canes in the “winners” column of any draft analyst who uses analytics as a key component of player evaluation, because they are excellent at extracting value throughout the draft.
Having said that, if the Canes are short on a specific position, they could use some centers in the pipeline. Many of their high-end projected players are defenders (Dominik Badinka, Alexander Nikishin, Scott Morrow) or wingers (Bradly Nadeau, Nikita Artamonov, Felix Unger Sorum). All of those players are projected to be middle- or top-of-the-lineup contributors in the next few years. However, the Canes lack a center prospect who projects in the same category.
Given where they are selecting and their draft philosophy, some players who may intrigue them are Jack Murtagh, William Moore, Cameron Schmidt (though he’s a winger), Ivan Ryabkin, Jack Nesbitt and Milton Gastrin.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 1st (TOR), 2nd, 2nd (DAL), 3rd, 4th, 4th (NYR), 6th, 7th
It is no secret the Blackhawks have some serious talent in the pipeline, but the majority of it is on defense. After opting for Artyom Levshunov over Ivan Demidov, and drafting Kevin Korchinski, Sam Rinzel and Ethan Del Mastro, Chicago has depth on the blue line for the foreseeable future.
However, they lack a star-caliber forward to complement the franchise’s most important piece, Connor Bedard. It is imperative the Blackhawks add a forward with a top-line projection who can produce and facilitate offense. Ideally, this player can drive play on their own, potentially allowing Chicago to spread the riches in the top six. There needs to be a serious injection of talent at the top of the lineup to get the rebuild moving more quickly.
Given the draft capital and position — their first pick is No. 3 overall — they should absolutely be targeting Michael Misa, Porter Martone or James Hagens with their first pick, and look at players like Shane Vansaghi, Benjamin Kindel, Nathan Behm and Ryker Lee with their other selections in the top 64.
2025 draft picks: 4th (VAN), 7th
After trading Calum Ritchie at the deadline, the Avalanche lack upside in their prospect pool. Outside of Mikhail Gulyayev, there is a real lack of players who have a chance to play impactful roles, and zero forward prospects with top-six projections.
Given the contention window and the all-in mentality, it is no surprise the Avalanche lack high-end skill in their prospect pipeline. However, the Avalanche are going to need players who can play impactful minutes to complement the supreme talent at the top of their roster.
The Avalanche have two total selections in the upcoming draft, and without maneuvering to add draft capital in the first three rounds, will be hard-pressed to find the type of upside they need in their prospect pool.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 1st (MIN), 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th, 7th (VGK)
The Blue Jackets took a major step forward this season, and some of their younger players had a key role in that development. The Blue Jackets are set up the middle, provided Cayden Lindstrom remains healthy and develops into a second-line player. They have tremendous young talent on the wings, and offensive firepower on the blue line.
But after trading David Jiricek this past season, the Blue Jackets are without a prospect in the pipeline that projects to be a top-four defender that eats minutes against the opposition’s best players. Charlie Elick has a longshot projection to be a No. 4, but is most likely to be a depth defender who plays on the penalty kill.
Columbus could fill this need in the form of Logan Hensler, Kashawn Aitcheson, Cameron Reid, Blake Fiddler and/or Sascha Boumedienne given their two first-round selections in the upcoming draft.
2025 draft picks: 3rd, 5th, 5th (NJ), 6th, 7th
Given where the Stars are — and their knack for drafting and developing players outside of the top 20 — it isn’t terribly concerning that their prospect pool lacks a high-end center. Wyatt Johnston and Roope Hintz should be their top two centers for the foreseeable future. However, the Stars lack any center depth in the prospect pipeline and would benefit from bolstering that position.
Mavrik Bourque and Emil Hemming are their best remaining prospects at forward. Both are wingers, and Bourque ages out of the prospect pool after this season. Lian Bischel, Christian Kyrou and Aram Minnetian represent legitimate upside on defense, making the need for a center more pronounced.
Given their lack of draft capital, it will be difficult to acquire the type of player their prospect pool needs without draft pick acquisition.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd (NYR), 4th (TB), 5th, 6th, 7th, 7th (STL)
The Red Wings have a ton of young prospects, but the majority of their high-end prospects are defenders. Both Lucas Raymond and Marco Kasper can no longer be considered prospects, and the Red Wings lack a single player in their pipeline with a top-line projection.
Nate Danielson and Michael Brandsegg-Nygard are projected to become middle-six forwards while Axel Sandin-Pelikka and Andrew Gibson are expected to join an excellent young blue line. Trey Augustine projects to be a starting goaltender in the NHL, leaving the Red Wings with projectable players everywhere except the top of their forward lineup.
The Red Wings need players who can produce offense and drive play. Players that would be a welcome addition to the pipeline include Carter Bear, Jake O’Brien, Lynden Lakovic, and Cole Reschny. If the likes of Viktor Eklund or Roger McQueen were to fall out of the top 10, the Red Wings should be thrilled to get either of them.
2025 draft picks: 3rd (STL), 6th, 7th
The Oilers have three picks in the entire draft and none in the top 64.
It is no surprise that a team in their contention window lacks skill in their prospect pool because it means they’ve drafted late, traded their picks away or traded their high-end prospects. The Oilers have done all three, and lack high-end skill outside of Matthew Savoie.
Sam O’Reilly and Beau Akey represent the best chance to become middle-of-the-lineup players for Edmonton, who desperately need a skilled winger to flank Connor McDavid or Leon Draisaitl. They’re going to have to trade up or swing for the fences with the likes of LJ Mooney, Shamar Moses, Filip Ekberg and Gustav Hillstrom.
2025 draft picks: 4th, 4th (CGY), 5th, 5th (SJ), 6th, 7th
When a team has recently won the Stanley Cup and made multiple deep playoff runs over the past few years, it’s likely to have a barren prospect cupboard.
That is the case with the Florida Panthers who need … well, everything. There isn’t a single position of strength in the pipeline, nor is there a single player projected to be an impact player at any position.
Justin Sourdif, Jack Devine and Gracyn Sawchyn have the best chance to become NHL forwards, while Marek Alscher and Tobias Bjornfot have a chance to become depth NHL defenders.
Gone is goaltender Spencer Knight, and the Panthers have no goaltenders projected to play NHL games in their system. There is no need to be picky, and given they are without a draft selection in the first three rounds, the Panthers need to swing on skill and upside with their late-round picks.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 7th (PHI)
The Kings are without a single prospect on defense that is projected to become an NHL player, after graduating Brandt Clarke. However, forwards Liam Greentree, Koehn Ziemmer, and Kenny Connors have NHL projections to varying degrees. Greentree is most likely to be a middle-six forward, with the other two projected to become depth NHL players.
In goal, the Kings are overflowing with talent between Carter George, Hampton Slukynsky and Erik Portillo. In fact, there is a strong argument that the Kings have the best goaltending pipeline in the NHL.
The Kings need defensemen in the pipeline, and are well equipped to add a few in the upcoming draft. Top-90 targets include Blake Fiddler, Sascha Boumedienne, Carter Amico, Kurban Limatov and Alex Huang.
2025 draft picks: 2nd, 4th (TOR), 5th (CBJ), 6th
It is very weird to look at a prospect pool and get the initial impression that a playoff team doesn’t have any holes. But that’s what happens when you’ve got the best drafted-to-signed NHL contract ratio over the past five years.
The Wild are stocked with high-end prospects at every position, from goaltender Jesper Wallstedt to defensemen David Jiricek and Zeev Buium to forwards Danila Yurov, Ryder Ritchie, Charlie Stramel and Hunter Haight. There is no shortage of talent in the Wild prospect pool, and they are set up to have excellent depth for years.
Their drafting mantra is one that many fanbases wishes their team had: take the best player available. There is no “high-floor, low-ceiling” nonsense, or worries about a smaller, skilled player. The Wild have one pick in the first three rounds this year but expect them to continue to extract value in the later rounds.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 1st (CGY), 2nd, 2nd (PIT), 3rd, 3rd (NJ), 3rd (VAN), 4th, 4th (BOS), 5th, 6th, 7th
The Canadiens’ rebuild process through the draft has been no joke. Taking chances on smaller players like Cole Caufield and Lane Hutson has been nothing short of brilliant. Add Ivan Demidov, Michael Hage and Filip Mesar to the mix, and the Habs have a lot of quality skaters in the pipeline.
Jacob Fowler is one of the top goalie prospects in the sport, and projects to be an NHL starter, perhaps best suited for a platoon role. On defense, the club is hoping David Reinbacher remains healthy and develops into a top-four minutes-eater they saw when they selected him early in 2023.
To round out the Canadiens’ roster, they need some hard skill. A player who can complement their soft-skilled scorers and win puck battles, score at the net front and be a physical presence on the wall. They have that with Kaiden Guhle on the back end, and if Owen Beck and Joshua Roy can make the jump, they will be solid, bottom-six players.
Having someone in the top-six who can bring the physicality and produce 65-70 points per season would add a dimension. Juraj Slafkovsky has some of those traits in his game, but a player like Brady Martin or Caleb Desnoyers would be the perfect fit. If Roger McQueen happens to slide the way Lane Hutson did, he would fit this mold nicely.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 1st (TB), 1st (VGK), 2nd, 2nd (TB), 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 6th (COL)
Barry Trotz has pulled no punches in his assessment of the draft, and thank goodness, because the Predators need skill. They have lacked a true, top-line scoring center to play with Filip Forsberg for years. There are scoring wingers and two-way centers in the pipeline, but there are no point-producing centers.
With a top-five pick, the Predators are primed to add an elite center. Any one of Hagens, Misa or Frondell would be a great selection for the Preds. Should they opt to swing for the home run if Misa is unavailable, McQueen makes sense, but there are understandable reservations with his injury history.
Regardless of who the Preds select at No. 5, there will be a center with top-six projection available to them. Misa, the best center in the draft, followed by Hagens, a 70-plus point, two-way center and Frondell, who projects to be a top-line center, should all get significant consideration.
After trading Yaroslav Askarov to San Jose, the Preds lack a goaltender in their pipeline, and can take one of Joshua Ravensbergen or Jack Ivankovic with one of their four other selections in the first two rounds.
2025 draft picks: 2nd, 2nd (EDM), 3rd (VGK), 4th, 6th, 6th (SJ)
The Devils have quality top-six centers locked up, and Nico Hischier found himself in the Selke Trophy conversation this season. However, both he and Jack Hughes are on the smaller side, and have accrued a fair injury history. Given their immense talent, the former first overall picks will lead the Devils for foreseeable future.
The Devils’ brass seems to like size, and would do well to add a big center to the mix. Without a first-round pick, they will be hard-pressed to add an impact center, but many middle-six centers have come from the second and third rounds.
The Devils are loaded on defense to the point where some of those players may be used as trade chips to acquire pieces that can help the Devils contend. Tyler Brennan and Mikhail Yegorov both have NHL potential, and provide options at the goalie position.
Targeting size, regardless of forward position, wouldn’t be a surprise, and some players who fit that mold include William Horcoff, Jakob Ihs-Wozniak, Eddie Genborg and Vaclav Nestrasil.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th
The Isles hit the jackpot in winning the draft lottery in the year that a defender is the consensus top pick. The need for a No. 1 defenseman is pressing, and Matthew Schaefer is that guy. He should be the first overall pick and will go a long way to slotting everyone on the Isles’ blue line into a better spot.
The Isles have quality forward talent, with Calum Ritchie and Cole Eiserman projected to be top-six forwards while Danny Nelson and Quinn Finley project to become depth NHLers.
On defense, it is a lot thinner with only Calle Odelius and Jesse Pulkkinen projected to play NHL games. The Isles need to bolster the defensive pipeline, as it is an area of weakness.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd, 3rd (SEA), 4th (ANA), 4th (COL), 5th (MIN), 6th, 6th (SEA), 7th
The Rangers are a bit of an enigma in terms of their direction. They have young players and aging players; they have a blue line that needs help and everything outside of their goaltender Igor Shesterkin seems to be in flux.
The Rangers should use their first-round pick this year, and hope that next year’s pick, owned by Pittsburgh, is a lot lower because they’ve made the playoffs. It isn’t that the Rangers lack talent, it is that there is a concerning pattern of inability to develop that talent to its full potential (Kaapo Kakko, Filip Chytil, Vitali Kravtsov, Llias Andersson, Nils Lundkvist, Zac Jones). Gabe Perreault, EJ Emery, and Drew Fortescue are the only players in the system with confident NHL projections, and none of them play center.
The Rangers could use more mobile defenders and someone like Radim Mrtka or Kashawn Aitcheson fits their drafting style. If they opt for a center, they’d need to hope one of Jake O’Brien or Caleb Desnoyers falls to them at 12.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 3rd (FLA), 4th (SJ), 5th, 6th, 7th
The Senators took a major step this season in large part because their top-of-the-lineup players were excellent and they got decent goaltending. When the Sens have drafted for skill, as with Tim Stutzle and Jake Sanderson, they have hit home runs. When they’ve drafted for toughness, it has not gone nearly as well.
The Sens’ prospect pipeline has a lot of size, a lot of truculence and serious tenacity. It lacks high-end skill, and players projected to be offensive producers above the 60-point plateau. The Sens own the 21st overall pick in the draft, and can use that to draft a forward with some offensive creativity. Players that fit the description include Kindel, Potter, Reschny, Cootes and Schmidt, Lakovic and Carbonneau. Should they opt for defenders, Logan Hensler and Cameron Reid would fit nicely.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 1st (COL), 1st (EDM), 2nd, 2nd (ANA), 2nd (CGY), 2nd (CBJ), 3rd, 5th, 5th (CAR), 6th
The Flyers need high-end skill in every area of their prospect pool and having three first-round picks allows them to swing for the fences on players. Philly should be targeting players with significant upside, even if they fall into the boom/bust category.
There is a need for skill at the center position. Oliver Bonk brings skill on the blue line, and should slide into the top four in the next couple of years. However, the Flyers lack a prospect with point-per-game potential up front, and finding Matvei Michkov a center should be a priority.
There are many players the Flyers can target with their first pick, and Martone, McQueen, Frondell, Eklund and Desnoyers should all get significant consideration. With their other picks in the 20s, the Flyers can take players who slide, or go after Ryabkin, Potter, Kindel, Cootes and Nesbitt. There is a significant opportunity to add speed, skill and elite offensive creativity to their prospect pipeline, and the Flyers need to make good on it.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 1st (NYR), 2nd (WSH), 3rd, 3rd (MIN), 3rd (OTT), 4th, 5th (CHI), 5th (NYR), 6th, 7th
The Penguins have two first-ballot Hall of Fame centers still playing at a high level in Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. However, there is an extreme need for elite talent at the top of the lineup to drive play and produce offense.
Tanner Howe and Rutger McGroarty are projected to be middle-six forwards with 60- to 65-point ceilings. Melvin Fernstrom and Tristan Broz have depth NHL projections.
On defense, Owen Pickering and Harrison Brunicke have top-four projections, and Joel Blomqvist has potential to be a legitimate NHL starter in goal.
The good news for the Penguins is there is plenty of high-end talent available for them to select in the first few rounds. Eklund, McQueen, Lakovic and O’Brien all make sense for the Pens given their upside. Later in the draft, Luca Romano, Viktor Klingsell, LJ Mooney and Filip Ekberg would fit their draft style.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 1st (DAL), 2nd, 2nd (OTT), 3rd (COL), 4th (STL), 4th (WPG), 5th (COL), 7th (NJ)
With so many highly touted prospects in the pipeline, it is somewhat incredible the Sharks need defenders. Outside of Sam Dickinson and Mattias Havelid, the Sharks lack talent on the back end. Both Havelid and Dickinson play an offensive playstyle rather than two-way, which creates a need in the pipeline.
The Sharks are expected to draft a forward with their top selection, although they must be hoping the Isles pass on Matthew Schaefer at No. 1. Barring that, which seems unlikely, the Sharks have three more picks in the first two rounds after second overall. Two-way or defensive defenders they can target include Fiddler, Henry Brzustewicz, and Simon (Haoxi) Wang. Defenders who can complement Dickinson and Havelid, move the puck effectively and defend in transition are exactly what the Sharks need to continue their rebuild.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd, 2nd (TOR), 4th, 4th (DAL), 5th, 7th
The Kraken have two young centers in Matty Beniers and Shane Wright, and a few budding forward prospects with top-six NHL projections in Berkly Catton and Eduard Sale. In the middle six, at least two of Carson Rehkopf, Jagger Firkus, Jani Nyman and Julius Miettinen should provide varying levels of offensive production.
In goal, the Kraken have Niklas Kokko and Kim Saarinen, who have modest NHL projections. With depth up front and talent in goal, the Kraken have a defensive need. Outside of Caden Price and Lukas Dragicevic, the Kraken lack prospects with NHL projections.
Jackson Smith makes sense for them in the first round, as a two-way defender with a top-four projection. In the second round, Charlie Tretheway and Brzustewicz make sense as both have NHL projections.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 5th, 6th
The Blues have done a great job of stocking the cupboard with talent, albeit talent that is projected to be less impactful. They have a few forward prospects projected to be middle-six players, like Otto Stenberg, Dalibor Dvorsky, and Adam Jecho. On defense, Adam Jiricek, Colin Ralph, Theo Lindstein and Michael Buchinger all have decent NHL projections.
The Blues lack truly elite talent in their prospect pool. Dvorsky has the highest upside, but his path to becoming a first-line point producer is not as confident. The Blues need a top-line forward or an elite defender in their pipeline, someone who can be a difference-maker.
The Blues own their first-round pick, but don’t have another until the fifth round this year. There are likely to be some highly skilled players available at No. 19, including Kindel, Schmidt, Ryabkin and Potter for the Blues to select.
2025 draft picks: 2nd (LA), 4th (EDM), 5th, 7th, 7th (MIN), 7th (SJ), 7th (UTA)
The Lightning have traded a lot of picks recently, and Isaac Howard, who was a first-round selection, does not intend to sign with them. That’s a tough bounce for a team that has not drafted in the first round very much over the past five years.
From top to bottom, the Lightning pipeline needs skill and players with NHL projections. They lack both and need to find diamonds in the rough to complement their aging skilled players. At every position, the Lightning need to add players with legitimate NHL potential — meaning there is no need to be picky on position.
The acquisition of Conor Geekie last offseason helped, and he is clearly the best young player in the organization. Given a lack of draft capital in the first few rounds, the Lightning will need to be judicious in their approach.
2025 draft picks: 2nd (FLA), 3rd (EDM), 5th, 5th (PIT), 6th, 7th
When you don’t draft a lot, and you trade your best prospects away, you’re going to lack skill in the pipeline. After trading Fraser Minten, the only remaining forward prospect for Toronto with a top-six projection is Easton Cowan, and he projects to be a second-line player.
The Leafs have an abundance of goaltending prospects, and drafted Ben Danford in 2024. There are few defensive prospects that project to be NHL players, but the prospect pool lacks high-end skilled forwards.
It’s going to be tough to fill that gap, given the lack of draft capital, and will require the Leafs to take some swings. Players who may be available that have reasonable upside include Adam Benak, Luca Romano, LJ Mooney and Filip Ekberg; should they trade into the top 40, Cameron Schmidt, Jacob Ihs-Wozniak and Nathan Behm could be options.
Utah Mammoth
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th
The Utah Mammoth had quite a successful season, and now, with the luck of the lottery that evaded them in Arizona, moved from outside the top 10 to 4th overall.
With many highly drafted players, the Mammoth’s prospect pool and lineup is loaded with talent. Young players like Logan Cooley and Dylan Guenther are having a huge impact offensively at the NHL level. The Mammoth have many smaller forwards, but lack a top-six forward with size and skill. The type of player who physically imposes himself, wins pucks, is a nuisance at the net and will create open ice for the likes of Keller, Guenther, Logan Cooley and Tij Iginla (when ready).
With the No. 4 pick, there are a few options including Desnoyers, Martone and McQueen, and some have whispered Brady Martin’s name, though he would be considered a reach at that spot.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd, 3rd (SJ), 4th (OTT), 5th, 6th, 7th
If you tune into Vancouver radio, or listen to their President of Hockey Operations speak, you know exactly what the organization lacks from the NHL lineup to the prospect pool: a center. Whether Jim Rutherford is talking about it or one of the 17 different radio shows/podcasts, it is no secret.
After not drafting a center in 2022, passing on Zach Benson in 2023, and not drafting until the third round of 2024, it is no surprise their prospect pool has a few quality defenders and zero centers with top-six upside.
Armed with their selections in the first two rounds this year, it is highly likely the Canucks target a center to address a significant area of need. They are more likely to target certainty (high-floor, low-risk) than swing for the fences, given the lack of depth in the organization. Players who fit that and could be available to them include O’Brien, Cootes, Nesbitt, Moore, McKinney and Horcoff.
2025 draft picks: 2nd, 3rd (WSH), 4th, 5th, 6th, 6th (WSH)
It should come as no surprise that Vegas needs something in their prospect pool given their modus operandi of trading their drafted prospects. Almost every first-round selection has been traded by the Golden Knights, and no one expects that to change. There is a joke in NHL circles that if you’re drafted by Vegas in the first round, you’re probably not going to play in Vegas, so don’t get too comfortable.
Vegas doesn’t have a first-round selection this year, but they do have picks in rounds two though six. They have a pressing need for a defender, but the reality is, they have a pressing need for high-end talent if they want to continue to use their players as trade chips at the deadline.
The Knights are likely to target players with value around the league, meaning Tretheway, Brzustewicz, Radivojevic, Amico and Limatov will have value on defense. If Schmidt were to fall out of the first round, he may be someone Vegas targets as well.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 2nd (BOS), 3rd (CAR), 4th, 5th
It’s one heck of a year to need a goaltender in your prospect pool — and that is exactly what the Capitals need. The Caps have a pick in each of the first five rounds, and given the goaltending talent available in this draft, they could come away with a potential future starter.
With Logan Thompson and Charlie Lindgren signed for the new few years, there isn’t a pressing need for immediate help. However, there is no depth behind them, and no prospects with legitimate NHL projections. With projected NHL players at other positions like Cole Hutson, Terik Parascak, and Andrew Cristall in junior hockey, and Ryan Leonard, Hendrix Lapierre, Ryan Chesley, and Ivan Miroshnichenko playing professionally, the Caps have excellent young talent.
Joshua Ravensbergen, Jack Ivankovic and Alexei Medvedev all have legitimate NHL projections, with the first two having NHL starting goalie projections.
2025 draft picks: 1st, 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th
The Jets have a habit of retaining their top talent, convincing the likes of Mark Scheifele, Kyle Connor, Josh Morrissey and Connor Hellebuyck to stay put via long-term deals. Nikolaj Ehlers is yet to decide his future, but the Jets have reinforcements in the prospect pipeline at forward, via Brad Lambert, Brayden Yager, Kevin He and Colby Barlow.
The defense is much thinner, with Elias Salomonsson and Alfons Freij as the only prospects with any NHL projection, and they are modest ones at best. The Jets need to add defenders to the prospect pipeline, and have their first-round pick to do so. Defenders like Boumedienne, Tretheway and Fiddler could be around when the Jets make their pick, and make sense for their current pipeline.
The Jets don’t need immediate help, and these defenders are two or three years from having meaningful impact in the NHL, buying them time to develop.
You may like
Sports
No team has repeated in a quarter century. Are the Dodgers different?
Published
2 hours agoon
October 3, 2025By
admin
-
Alden GonzalezOct 3, 2025, 08:00 AM ET
Close- ESPN baseball reporter. Covered the L.A. Rams for ESPN from 2016 to 2018 and the L.A. Angels for MLB.com from 2012 to 2016.
WHEN THE LOW point arrived last year, on Sept. 15 in Atlanta, Los Angeles Dodgers manager Dave Roberts broke character and challenged some of his players in a meeting many of them later identified as a fulcrum in their championship run.
This year, he attempted to strike a more positive tone.
It was Sept. 6. The Dodgers had just been walked off in Baltimore, immediately after being swept in Pittsburgh, and though they were still 15 games above .500, a sense of uneasiness lingered. Their division lead was slim, consistency remained elusive and spirits were noticeably down. Roberts saw an opportunity to take stock.
“He was talking to us about the importance of what was in front of us,” Dodgers infielder Miguel Rojas said in Spanish. “At that time, there were like seven, eight weeks left because we only had three weeks left in the regular season, and he wanted all of us, collectively, to think about what we were still capable of doing, and the opportunity we still had to win another championship.”
Later that night, Yoshinobu Yamamoto got within an out of no-hitting the Baltimore Orioles, then he surrendered a home run to Jackson Holliday and watched the bullpen implode after his exit, allowing three additional runs in what became the Dodgers’ most demoralizing loss of the season. The next morning, though, music blared inside Camden Yards’ visiting clubhouse. Players were upbeat, vibes were positive.
The Dodgers won behind an effective Clayton Kershaw later that afternoon, then reeled off 16 wins over their next 21 games — including back-to-back emphatic victories over the Cincinnati Reds in the first round of the playoffs.
It took a day, but Roberts’ message had seemingly landed.
“We needed some positivity,” Dodgers outfielder Teoscar Hernandez said, “to remove all of the negativity that we were feeling in that moment.”
As they approach a highly anticipated National League Division Series against the Philadelphia Phillies, the Dodgers once again look like one of the deepest, most fearsome teams in the sport.
But the journey there was arduous.
A Dodgers team many outsiders pegged as a candidate to break the regular-season-wins record of 116 ultimately won only 93, its fewest total in seven years. Defending a championship, a task no team has successfully pulled off in a quarter-century, has proven to be a lot more difficult than many Dodger players anticipated. But they’ve maintained a belief that their best selves would arrive when it mattered most. And whether it’s a product of health, focus, or because the right message hit them at the right time, they believe it’s here now.
“We’re coming together at the right time,” Dodgers third baseman Max Muncy said amid a champagne-soaked celebration Wednesday night, “and that’s all that really matters.”
BUSTER POSEY’S San Francisco Giants became the most dominant team in the first half of the 2010s, during which they captured three championships. They won every other year — on even years, famously — but could not pull off the repeat the Dodgers are chasing. To this day, Posey, now the Giants’ president of baseball operations, can’t pinpoint why.
“I wish I could,” Posey said, “because if I knew what that one thing was, I would’ve tried to correct it the second, third time through.”
Major League Baseball has not had a repeat champion since the New York Yankees won their third consecutive title in 2000, a 24-year drought that stands as the longest ever among the four major North American professional sports, according to ESPN Research. In that span, the NBA had a team win back-to-back championships on four different occasions. The NHL? Three. The NFL, whose playoff rounds all consist of one game? Two.
MLB’s drought has occurred in its wild-card era, which began in 1995 and has expanded since.
“The baseball playoffs are really difficult,” Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman said. “You obviously have to be really good. You also have to have some really good fortune. The number of rounds and the fact that the very best team in the league wins around 60% of their games, the very worst team wins around 40% — now you take the upper-echelon in the playoffs, and the way baseball games can play out, good fortune is a real part of determining the outcomes.”
The Dodgers, now 11 wins shy of a second consecutive title, will hope for some of that good fortune this month. They’ve already encountered some of the pitfalls that come with winning a championship, including the one Posey experienced most vividly: the toll of playing deep into October.
“That month of postseason baseball — it’s more like two or three months of regular-season baseball, just because of the intensity of it,” Posey said.
The Dodgers played through Oct. 30 last year — and then they began this season March 18, nine days before almost everybody else, 5,500 miles away in Tokyo.
“At the time, you don’t see it,” Hernández said, “but when the next season starts, that’s when you start feeling your body not responding the way it should be. And it’s because you don’t get as much time to get ready, to prepare for next season. This one has been so hard, I got to be honest, because — we win last year, and we don’t even have the little extra time that everybody gets because we have to go to Japan. So, you have to push yourself to get ready a month early so you can be ready for those games. Those are games that count for the season. So, working hard when your body is not even close to 100%, I think that’s the reason. I think that’s why you see, after a team wins, next year you see a lot of players getting hurt.”
The Dodgers had the second-most amount of money from player salaries on the injured list this season, behind only the Yankees, the team they defeated in the World Series, according to Spotrac. The Dodgers sent an NL-leading 29 players to the IL, a list that included Freddie Freeman, who underwent offseason surgery on the injured ankle he played through last October, and several other members of their starting lineup — Will Smith, Max Muncy, Tommy Edman and Hernández.
The bullpen that carried the Dodgers through last fall might have paid the heaviest price. Several of those who played a prominent role last October — Blake Treinen, Michael Kopech, Evan Phillips — either struggled, were hurt or did not pitch. It might not have been the sole reason for the bullpen’s struggles — a combined 4.94 ERA from free agent signees Tanner Scott and Kirby Yates played just as big a role — but it certainly didn’t help.
“I don’t know if there’s any carryover thing,” Treinen said Sept. 16 after suffering his third consecutive loss. “I don’t believe in that. We just have a job, and it’s been weird.”
IN FEBRUARY, ROJAS made headlines by saying that the 2025 Dodgers could challenge the wins record and added they might win 120 games at full health. An 8-0 start — after an offseason in which the front office added Blake Snell, Roki Sasaki, Michael Conforto, Hyeseong Kim, Scott and Yates to what was arguably the sport’s best roster already — only ratcheted up the expectations.
The Dodgers managed a 53-32 record through the end of June — but then, they went 10-14 in July, dropped seven of their first 12 games in August and saw a seven-game lead in the National League West turn into a one-game deficit.
From July 1 to Aug. 14, the Dodgers’ offense ranked 20th in OPS and 24th in runs per game. The rotation began to round into form, but the bullpen sported the majors’ highest walk rate and put up a 1.43 WHIP in that stretch, fifth highest.
The Dodgers swept the San Diego Padres at home in mid-August, regaining some control of the division, but then Los Angeles split a series against the last-place Colorado Rockies and lost one in San Diego. The Dodgers swept the Reds, then lost two of three to the Arizona Diamondbacks, dropped three in a row to the Pirates and suffered those back-to-back walk-off losses to the Orioles.
Consistency eluded the Dodgers at a time when it felt as if every opponent was aiming for them.
Before rejoining the Dodgers ahead of the 2023 season, Rojas spent eight years with the Miami Marlins, who were continually out of the playoff race in September and found extra motivation when facing the best teams down the stretch. Those matchups functioned as their World Series.
“I think that’s the problem for those teams after winning a World Series — you’re going to have a target on your back,” Rojas said. “And it’s going to take a lot of effort for your main guys to step up every single day. And then, at the end of the regular season, you’re going to be kind of exhausted from the battle of every single day. And I think that’s why when teams get to the playoffs, they probably fall short.”
Travis d’Arnaud, now a catcher for the Los Angeles Angels, felt the same way while playing for the defending-champion Atlanta Braves in 2022. There was “a little bit more emotion” in games that otherwise didn’t mean much, he said. Teams seemed to bunt more frequently, play their infield in early and consistently line up their best relievers. Often, they’d face a starting pitcher who typically threw in the low-90s but suddenly started firing mid- to upper-90s fastballs.
“It’s just a different intensity,” said A.J. Pierzynski, the catcher for the Chicago White Sox teams that won it all in 2005 and failed to repeat in 2006. “It’s hard to quantify unless you’re playing in the games, but there’s a different intensity if you’re playing.”
BEFORE A SEASON-ENDING sweep of the Seattle Mariners, the 2025 Dodgers were dangerously close to finishing with the fewest full-season wins total of any team Friedman has overseen in these past 11 years. Friedman acknowledged that recently but added a caveat: “I’d also say that going into October, I think it’ll be the most talented team.”
It’s a belief that has fueled the Dodgers.
With Snell and Glasnow healthy, Yamamoto dialing up what was already an NL Cy Young-caliber season and Shohei Ohtani fully stretched out, the Dodgers went into the playoffs believing their rotation could carry them the way their bullpen did a year earlier. Their confidence was validated immediately. Snell allowed two baserunners through the first six innings of Game 1 of the wild-card round Tuesday night, and Yamamoto went 6⅔ innings without allowing an earned run 24 hours later.
“For us, it’s going to be our starting pitching,” Muncy said. “They’re going to set the tone.”
But an offense that has been without Smith, currently nursing a hairline fracture in his right hand, has also been clicking for a while. The Dodgers trailed only the Phillies in slugging percentage over the last three weeks of the regular season. In the Dodgers’ first two playoff games, 10 players combined to produce 28 hits. Six of them came from Mookie Betts, who began the season with an illness that caused him to lose close to 20 pounds and held a .670 OPS — 24 points below the league average — as recently as Aug. 6. Since then, he’s slashing .326/.384/.529.
His trajectory has resembled that of his team.
“We had a lot of struggles, really all year,” Betts said. “But I think we all view that as just a test to see how we would respond. And so now we’re starting to use those tests that we went through earlier to respond now and be ready now. And anything that comes our way, it can’t be worse than what we’ve already gone through.”
The Dodgers still don’t know if their bullpen will be good enough to take them through October — though Sasaki’s ninth inning Wednesday night, when he flummoxed the Reds with triple-digit fastballs and devastating splitters, certainly provided some hope — but they believe in their collective ability to navigate it.
They believe this roster is better and deeper than the championship-winning one from last fall. And, as Rojas said, they believe they “know how to flip the switch when it matters most.”
“It’s been a long year,” Muncy said. “At this point, seven months ago, we were on the other side of the world. We’ve been through a lot this year, and to end up in the spot we’re in right now — we’re in a great spot. We’re in the postseason. That’s all that matters. That’s what we’ve been saying all year. Anything can happen once you’re in October.”
Sports
Bama’s shot at revenge, high stakes in the ACC and the 29 biggest games of Week 6
Published
5 hours agoon
October 3, 2025By
admin
-
Bill ConnellyOct 3, 2025, 07:30 AM ET
Close- Bill Connelly is a writer for ESPN. He covers college football, soccer and tennis. He has been at ESPN since 2019.
It feels like we know less about the college football landscape now than we did a month ago. Virginia is ranked, and Clemson very much isn’t. Ole Miss, Oklahoma and Texas A&M are unbeaten and ranked in the AP top six, and Texas, Alabama, Georgia and LSU are not. If you knew nothing about college football history and dove into this crazy world only this season, you would believe that Indiana, Texas Tech and Vanderbilt are three of the most elite programs in the country.
It’s into this murky world that we wade for Week 6. Last week boasted serious headliners that clarified the Big Ten’s hierarchy (Oregon over Penn State) and very much blurred the SEC’s (Bama over Georgia, Ole Miss over LSU). Week 6 doesn’t feature the same marquee matchups, but we still get Miami-Florida State, plus many games that are far bigger and better than we expected — Bama against unbeaten Vandy, Virginia against unbeaten Louisville, Texas Tech against unbeaten Houston, and Iowa State against a scorching Cincinnati.
Welcome to October. It’s hard to see where this season is taking us, but that makes the journey awfully fun. Here’s everything you need to follow in a surprising, mysterious Week 6.
All times Eastern.
Revenge time in Tuscaloosa?
No. 16 Vanderbilt at No. 10 Alabama (3:30 p.m., ABC)
Part of succeeding a legend is that we notice anytime you don’t live up to the legend’s standards. Granted, Kalen DeBoer has proven adept at continuing Nick Saban’s relative success against Kirby Smart’s Georgia, but DeBoer’s track record otherwise has some holes. He has already lost four games to unranked teams, as many as Saban lost in 17 years. Not great.
Saban was particularly good at putting upstarts in their place — think of Michigan State and Washington in the College Football Playoff. Or Missouri in the SEC championship game. Or Mississippi State every time the Bulldogs thought they were good. He was also good at revenge. His Crimson Tide bopped Tim Tebow’s Florida in 2009 and beat LSU by three TDs when they got a second shot at the Tigers in the 2011 BCS Championship Game. They lost to Auburn four times but won the following year by an average of 25 points.
You might remember what happened the last time Alabama played Vanderbilt.
0:52
Vanderbilt fans storm field after historic win over Alabama
Vanderbilt hangs on for its first-ever win over a No. 1 ranked team in a thrilling 40-35 victory over Alabama.
Vandy has to go to Tuscaloosa this time, which sets up a revenge opportunity. But the Commodores are much better this time. They’re 11th in SP+, and they’re scoring 49 points per game. Diego Pavia is third nationally in Total QBR (and maybe the second-best power conference quarterback to date), completing 75% of his passes and averaging nearly 7 yards per non-sack carry. Backs Sedrick Alexander and Makhilyn Young are averaging 6.9 yards per carry, tight end Eli Stowers is catching everything and receiver Junior Sherrill has scored on five of his 17 receptions.
The Commodores are combining ruthless efficiency with above-average explosiveness.
Because Vandy has so thoroughly taken care of business through five games, Pavia hasn’t had to do as much — he had taken contact 108 times through five games last year (and battled wear-and-tear issues later in the season), but he’s at only 65 hits this year. If he needs to run more in the bigger games, he can probably handle it.
The Commodores’ defense isn’t amazing, but it’s also better than it was last season. Vandy plays decent run defense with great big-play prevention against the pass; safety CJ Heard is excellent, and linebackers Bryan Longwell and Khordae Sydnor swarm well.
Alabama remains an unfinished picture. The Crimson Tide’s defense looked downright unprepared in Week 1 against Florida State, but it has allowed only 11.7 points per game since. The Crimson Tide don’t create nearly enough negative plays, but they don’t give up big plays either, and safety Bray Hubbard keys a frustrating zone defense.
The offense has been the star of the show. Ty Simpson looked disheveled against Florida State, but he has been brilliant since, and the Tide are up to sixth in points per drive despite a below-average run game. They couldn’t quite close out Georgia after a brilliant first half, but Simpson is incredibly sharp, and the offensive line has shored up a lot of its Week 1 breakdowns.
After what happened in 2024, this game is symbolically huge. But it’s also just part of a huge stretch for both teams. Alabama just took down Georgia, but five of the Tide’s next six opponents rank 17th or better in SP+. At absolute worst, they’ll need to win four of six to keep their CFP hopes alive. Meanwhile, five of Vandy’s past seven opponents are also 17th or better. Without an obvious quality win yet, they’ll probably need to win five of seven. Now would be an apt time for Bama to throw its weight around and remind everyone who’s supposed to be the boss. But based solely on 2025 to date, the Commodores might yet be the Tide’s equal.
Current line: Bama -10.5 | SP+ projection: Bama by 2.5 | FPI projection: Bama by 6.9
A high-stakes doubleheader in the ACC
Virginia’s upset of Florida State last week damaged the hype value of one ACC matchup but heightened another. FSU hosts unbeaten Miami on Saturday evening in desperate need of a turnaround win, but the winner of the afternoon’s Virginia-Louisville game — a matchup of the teams with the second- (Louisville) and fourth-best (Virginia) ACC title odds, per SP+ — will be positioned wonderfully, too.
No. 3 Miami at No. 18 Florida State (7:30 p.m., ABC)
In some ways, you could say that Florida State was flying a little too high. The Seminoles had been nearly perfect in 2024, manhandling Alabama and humiliating two buy-game opponents (East Texas A&M and Kent State), and they were due a bad break or two. The defense hadn’t faced a tough and efficient run game like Virginia’s (including Alabama’s), and the offense had faced barely a down of adversity. Regression ran its course in Charlottesville last Friday night, when FSU lost an early fumble, gave up an acrobatic red zone interception and saw a juggling overtime touchdown catch go incomplete by millimeters. Stuff happens.
Even in the playoff era, though, a “stuff happens” loss can wipe out your margin for error. Thanks to early-season collapses from Clemson and Florida, Miami is the last SP+ top-40 opponent on FSU’s schedule, meaning this is likely the Seminoles’ last chance at another high-visibility win.
On paper, this one’s awfully even. Miami has its own solid, physical run game like Virginia’s, one with a bit better blocking but fewer yards after contact. The Hurricanes also have Carson Beck and a passing attack that rules third downs. It’s lacking explosiveness — Beck is averaging just 11.9 yards per completion — and therefore doesn’t generate loads of easy points. But it’s an efficient attack, and FSU’s defense has allowed a few more third-and-long conversions than is preferable.
With how well Notre Dame’s offense has played since, Miami’s Week 1 defensive performance against the Fighting Irish (24 points and 5.4 yards per play allowed) looks awfully impressive. But FSU’s offense has quite a bit to offer, even with the misfires against Virginia. The Seminoles rank first in points per drive and second in yards per play. Virginia hemmed in quarterback Tommy Castellanos and forced him to throw instead of making plays on the perimeter — it’s the key to keeping a lid on a Castellanos attack — but FSU still scored 35 points in regulation and averaged 6.4 yards per play. The ceiling is high even if teams defend the Noles correctly. Gavin Sawchuk and Ousmane Kromah average a combined 5.8 yards per carry with a 59% success rate, and Duce Robinson and Micahi Danzy have combined for 24 catches and 514 yards. And this is still one of the best Net YAC teams in the country.
Considering Miami took down Florida in part due to physical running, whoever generates more success in this regard could have a huge advantage.
With tackle Rueben Bain Jr. at full force and getting help from disruptors such as linebacker Mohamed Toure and nickel back Keionte Scott, Miami’s defense might be even better than Bama’s. It will land some shots, but if FSU can hold Beck and the Canes to 24 or fewer points, you have to like the Seminoles’ chances.
Current line: Miami -4.5 | SP+ projection: Miami by 2.1 | FPI projection: Miami by 3.9
No. 24 Virginia at Louisville (3:30 p.m., ESPN2)
What’s Virginia’s reward for winning a big game against an explosive Florida State offense? A big game against an explosive Louisville offense! Granted, Cardinals quarterback Miller Moss is more of an efficiency player, but wideout Chris Bell has big-play potential, and if or when the Louisville running back corps is healthy, look out. Isaac Brown and Duke Watson have battled injury, and they’ve combined for only 56 carries this year, but Brown is averaging 8.1 yards per carry (6.1 after contact!), and Watson averaged 8.9 in 2024.
Brown and Watson should be as close to full speed Saturday as they’ve been all year, and that’s good because Louisville has played against two SP+ top-50 defenses and averaged just 4.8 yards per play against them. The defense has improved a bit after slippage in recent years, thanks mostly to a pass rush led by star transfers Clev Lubin and Wesley Bailey, but for the Cardinals to live up to growing expectations, the run game will need to shift into gear.
Virginia, meanwhile, has already exceeded expectations. Obliterated them. Blown them to smithereens.
The transfer portal provides miracles for some teams each year and disaster for others, and it smiled on the Cavaliers with the potent additions of quarterback Chandler Morris, running back J’Mari Taylor, receivers Cam Ross and Jahmal Edrine and about 10 new rotation defenders, including star edge rushers Mitchell Melton and Daniel Rickert and nickel back Ja’son Prevard. The defense allows too many big plays and has allowed touchdowns on 80% of opponents’ red zone trips (125th nationally), and that was costly in a Week 2 loss to NC State. But the Hoos rule third downs on offense and defense, and that will take you pretty far. UVA has won more than eight games in a season just once in 17 years, but SP+ says there’s a 57% chance of at least a 9-3 finish. What a world.
Current line: Louisville -6.5 | SP+ projection: Louisville by 9.2 | FPI projection: Louisville by 1.4
This week in the Big 12
Five weeks into the 2024 season, we thought we had a decent read on the Big 12. BYU and Iowa State were still unbeaten, and Kansas State and Utah were 4-1 and looking good. Per SP+, those four teams had about a two-in-three chance of winning the conference. Arizona was 3-1 and hoping to make a run. 3-2 Oklahoma State and 3-1 Arizona State had equal long shot odds.
But the conference had all sorts of surprises in store. Utah lost seven games in a row, and Kansas State lost three of four down the stretch. Arizona and OSU went a combined 1-14 the rest of the way, while Arizona State transformed into a top-10 caliber team in November and won the conference title.
We probably don’t know anything about this conference race yet, in other words, no matter how much it feels like we do. Texas Tech has looked spectacular in its first four games, and Iowa State, BYU, Utah and Arizona State are all positioned pretty well. But Week 6 sends the top two favorites on the road against upstarts and offers a few teams with early losses a chance to get right and stay in the race. We have some plot-twist opportunities for a conference that loves nothing more than delivering them.
No. 11 Texas Tech at Houston (7 p.m., ESPN)
Texas Tech has been genuinely awesome this season, walloping three bad teams as an elite team should and then physically manhandling Utah in Salt Lake City two weeks ago. They’ve been awesome at pretty much everything — they’re fifth in yards per play on offense and defense — and aside from a predilection for penalties and some injury-prone tendencies for quarterback Behren Morton, we don’t really know their weaknesses yet.
Houston’s a little bit easier to figure out. Defense: good. Offense: not so much. The Cougars are ninth in yards per play allowed and are very much in the best quadrant of this chart.
Willie Fritz lost defensive coordinator Shiel Wood to Tech, but the UH defense has been even better with replacement Austin Armstrong. But the Conner Weigman-led offense remains a work in progress. The Coogs go three-and-out nearly 39% of the time (124th), and that will probably be their downfall in this one. But if the defense sets up some easy scoring opportunities, this one quickly moves into “upset watch” territory.
Current line: Tech -10.5 (down from -12.5 on Sunday) | SP+ projection: Tech by 13.9 | FPI projection: Tech by 7.0
No. 14 Iowa State at Cincinnati (noon, ESPN2)
If you combined Cincinnati’s offense with Houston’s defense, you’d have a potential top-10 team. Last Saturday’s 37-34 win at Kansas inserted the Bearcats into the Big 12 title conversation. We’ll see if the Bearcats have the defensive chops to remain a factor — their run defense is strong thanks in part to star tackle Dontay Corleone (who’s as questionable this week), but they’re 136th, last nationally, in completion rate allowed. But quarterback Brendan Sorsby is on a roll, and Cincy ranks first nationally in rushing success rate. Track meets could work out well for the Bearcats.
Iowa State is not a track meet team. The Cyclones have allowed more than 16 points just once in five games, but they’ve also topped 24 only twice. ISU runs a lot on first down but doesn’t get very far, so quarterback Rocco Becht has to convert a lot of third downs. He usually pulls it off, though, either with deep shots to Brett Eskildsen and Chase Sowell or passes to any of four tight ends.
The ISU defense is strong once again. The Cyclones rarely invade the backfield, but Domonique Orange occupies space up front (he’s listed as probable this week), and they tackle well, prevent big plays and pounce on mistakes. Sorsby hasn’t made many mistakes lately, though.
Current line: Cincy -1.5 | SP+ projection: ISU by 3.2 | FPI projection: ISU by 0.3
Kansas State at Baylor (noon, ESPN+)
Kansas State suffered a three-week funk after losing to Iowa State in Dublin, Ireland, but quarterback Avery Johnson just enjoyed, by far, his best game of the season, and RB Dylan Edwards is finally healthy. The Wildcats still have only one conference loss, but their next four games — at Baylor, TCU, at Kansas, Texas Tech — will require a sustained A-game. Sawyer Robertson and the prolific Bears also have one conference loss and could easily stay in the conversation with a strong performance.
Current line: Baylor -6.5 | SP+ projection: Baylor by 3.4 | FPI projection: Baylor by 2.6
Kansas at UCF (7:30 p.m., ESPN2)
UCF makes a lot of big plays but can’t keep a quarterback healthy and missed a solid upset opportunity with a poor performance at Kansas State last week. With last week’s defeat to Cincinnati, meanwhile, Kansas has dropped eight of its past nine one-score finishes since late 2023. Iowa State weathered a similar streak recently before flipping that script, and if KU does the same, it’s not too late to get into the race. It’s now or never, though.
Current line: Kansas -4.5 | SP+ projection: Kansas by 1.2 | FPI projection: Kansas by 1.5
A CFP eliminator of sorts
Boise State at No. 21 Notre Dame (3:30 p.m., NBC)
Last week was great and terrible for Notre Dame. On one hand, the Fighting Irish looked spectacular in making Arkansas quit in a 56-13 road blowout. The offense is improving rapidly, and CJ Carr is quickly becoming one of the nation’s best quarterbacks. Meanwhile, despite injuries to star corner Leonard Moore and tackle Donovan Hinish, among others, the defense finally showed some life after a poor start to 2025. Notre Dame is the projected favorite in every remaining game.
On the other hand, the Irish’s potential CFP résumé, should they win out and get to 10-2, took a hit. USC’s loss to Illinois hurt their potential for a top-10 win, and four other upcoming opponents all lost. It will be difficult for the Irish to stand out in a pile of two-loss teams, even if they deliver blowouts.
The blowouts must continue regardless. And we’ll see how that goes against a Boise State team that has shifted nicely into gear. The running back trio of Sire Gaines, Dylan Riley and Malik Sherrod combined for 190 yards from scrimmage last week against Appalachian State, while Maddux Madsen threw for 321 yards and four touchdowns. The pass rush, led by Jayden Virgin-Morgan and Braxton Fely, delivered five sacks. The Mountain West has a growing number of potential contenders this season — UNLV, Fresno State, perhaps New Mexico or San Diego State — but the Broncos still lead the pack.
Under Marcus Freeman, Notre Dame has been either ridiculously rude or ridiculously accommodating to aspirational Group of 5 opponents. The Irish fell 26-21 to Marshall in 2022 and, famously, 16-14 to Northern Illinois last year, but they also pummeled excellent Army and Navy teams last fall. Boise State has looked like Boise State since the demoralizing Week 1 dud against South Florida, and an upset here would push the Broncos back to the top of the pile in the Group of 5. Both of these teams have big-play capabilities, plus defenses that have been a little too willing to give up a chunk play or two. Let’s see if BSU can keep up with an increasingly ruthless Notre Dame attack.
Current line: Irish -20.5 (up from -17.5) | SP+ projection: Irish by 13.5 | FPI projection: Irish by 18.8
Week 6 chaos superfecta
We’re once again using this space to will chaos into existence, looking at four carefully curated games with pretty big point spreads and mashing them together into a much more upset-friendly number. Houston’s overtime win over Oregon State cost us a fourth win in five tries — how could you do that to us, Coogs? — but 3-for-5 is still pretty good.
Going 4-for-6 is even better, though. SP+ tells us there’s only a 55% chance that Nebraska (81% win probability against Michigan State), Illinois (85% over Purdue), Michigan (88% over Wisconsin) and Ohio State (90% over Minnesota) all win. It’s time to take down a Big Ten favorite.
Week 6 playlist
Here are some more games you should pay attention to if you want to get the absolute most out of the weekend, from both information and entertainment perspectives.
Friday evening
West Virginia at No. 23 BYU (10:30 p.m., ESPN). I’m sticking this one in the Playlist instead of the Big 12 section above because of the larger point spread. BYU overcame a poor performance to remain unbeaten against Colorado, and the Cougars could probably withstand another iffy game this weekend. But it feels like a race to get quarterback Bear Bachmeier — 48th in Total QBR, 51st in yards per dropback — ready for an epic run of high-stakes Big 12 games on the horizon.
Current line: BYU -18.5 | SP+ projection: BYU by 22.4 | FPI projection: BYU by 23.5
New Mexico at San José State (10 p.m., FS1). I’m not sure anyone in college football is having more fun than New Mexico.
You Know The Vibes™️#GoLobos pic.twitter.com/Ix1Nx8lPxZ
— New Mexico Football (@UNMLoboFB) September 27, 2025
The Lobos frustrated Michigan, stomped UCLA and beat rival New Mexico State for the Chile Roaster trophy. Now, with trips to San José and Boise in the next two weeks, we find out if this is a fun bowl push or a fun Mountain West title push.
Current line: SJSU -2.5 | SP+ projection: UNM by 1.0 | FPI projection: UNM by 0.9
Early Saturday
Clemson at North Carolina (noon, ESPN). One of the most noteworthy ACC games in the preseason — Dabo Swinney’s top-five Clemson versus Bill Belichick’s North Carolina! — still packs intrigue, but it’s mostly negative. Clemson has lost to all three of its power-conference opponents, and UNC has lost to two by a combined 82-23. Clemson likely has too much talent for the Heels, but, well, that hasn’t stopped the Tigers from playing like they have thus far.
Current line: Clemson -14.5 | SP+ projection: Clemson by 7.7 | FPI projection: Clemson by 8.3
No. 22 Illinois at Purdue (noon, BTN). Illinois responded well to its humiliation at Indiana two weeks ago, beating USC in a nailbiter in Champaign. Now comes a different kind of test. Purdue has a spry passing game and an aggressive (if spectacularly dysfunctional) defense, and if the Illini are caught looking ahead to next week’s Ohio State game, the Boilermakers could land some punches.
Current line: Illinois -9.5 | SP+ projection: Illinois by 16.7 | FPI projection: Illinois by 7.0
Kentucky at No. 12 Georgia (noon, ABC). Kentucky nearly beat Georgia last season before the wheels totally fell off in Lexington, but four games into 2025, the Wildcats still haven’t put the wheels back on. This is a get-right opportunity for Kirby Smart’s surprisingly mediocre (by their standards) Dawgs before Ole Miss visits in two weeks.
Current line: UGA -20.5 | SP+ projection: UGA by 17.4 | FPI projection: UGA by 17.0
Wisconsin at No. 20 Michigan (noon, Fox). Michigan is a week away from a huge trip to USC, but the Wolverines must first handle a Wisconsin team that has just continued to fall into further depths. Badgers quarterback Billy Edwards Jr. should finally be near full strength, which can’t hurt, but they have just been lifeless this year.
Current line: Michigan -17.5 | SP+ projection: Michigan by 18.8 | FPI projection: Michigan by 15.8
Air Force at Navy (noon, CBS). Air Force might have found its next awesome option quarterback in sophomore Liam Szarka. Unfortunately, the Falcons’ defense has allowed at least 44 points against all three of its FBS opponents. Will that matter or will this become the typical battle of attrition that service-academy rivalry games frequently become?
Current line: Navy -12.5 | SP+ projection: Navy by 18.7 | FPI projection: Navy by 13.2
Saturday afternoon
No. 9 Texas at Florida (3:30 p.m., ESPN). I wouldn’t have guessed this one would be relegated to the Playlist, but here we are. Florida’s defense is excellent and could absolutely frustrate Arch Manning & Co., but the Gators have scored 33 points in three games against FBS opponents, and Texas has the best defense in the country, per SP+. It’s hard to think of anything else mattering beyond that.
Current line: Texas -6.5 | SP+ projection: Texas by 9.9 | FPI projection: Texas by 7.8
Washington at Maryland (3:30 p.m., BTN). On Christmas Day in 1982, Washington’s Tim Cowan outdueled Maryland’s Boomer Esiason, throwing for 369 yards and three touchdowns — including the game winner with six seconds left — as the Huskies won a 21-20 Aloha Bowl thriller. I just listed the entire football history between these two new conference mates.
Current line: UW -6.5 | SP+ projection: Maryland by 1.6 | FPI projection: UW by 0.5
Michigan State at Nebraska (4 p.m., FS1). Michigan State’s Aidan Chiles and Nebraska’s Dylan Raiola have made nice strides this season, but only Raiola is getting help from his defense. Can Chiles, receiver Omari Kelly and the Spartans’ offense suck the Huskers into a track meet or is the NU pass defense — first nationally in yards per dropback — too much?
Current line: Nebraska -11.5 | SP+ projection: Nebraska by 13.7 | FPI projection: Nebraska by 13.1
No. 7 Penn State at UCLA (3:30 p.m., CBS). Penn State should get back on track after last week’s frustrating loss to Oregon, but I’m highlighting this game primarily to point out that, per SP+, UCLA is a projected underdog of at least 16 points in every remaining game and has a 61% chance of finishing 0-12. It was easy to see this season perhaps not going well, but wow.
Current line: PSU -25.5 | SP+ projection: PSU by 32.5 | FPI projection: PSU by 20.2
Kent State at No. 5 Oklahoma (4 p.m., SECN). OK, yes, OU will win by a lot. But with John Mateer out because of injury, we’ll get a look at how backup Michael Hawkins Jr. runs the Ben Arbuckle offense and what kind of chance the Sooners might have against Texas next week.
Current line: OU -45.5 | SP+ projection: OU by 48.0 | FPI projection: OU by 46.3
Saturday evening
Mississippi State at No. 6 Texas A&M (7:30 p.m., SECN). Texas A&M nearly suffered a “stuff happens” loss last week, dominating Auburn statistically but winning by only 6, but the Aggies remain unbeaten and are projected favorites in the next three games. This one’s interesting, though. A&M makes and allows big plays, while Mississippi State, having already played in two down-to-the-wire finishes with more to come, makes and allows few.
Current line: A&M -14.5 | SP+ projection: A&M by 4.9 | FPI projection: A&M by 9.0
Minnesota at No. 1 Ohio State (7:30 p.m., NBC). Ohio State faced one of the best offensive teams in the country (to date) last week at Washington and brushed the Huskies aside with relative ease. Now, the Buckeyes face one of the most reliably solid defenses in the country. Minnesota tackles well and generates loads of negative plays, which will provide Julian Sayin & Co. with a different type of test. I’m guessing they’ll ace this one too.
Current line: OSU -23.5 | SP+ projection: OSU by 20.7 | FPI projection: OSU by 23.1
Colorado at TCU (7:30 p.m., Fox). As with BYU, TCU is a Big 12 contender facing a theoretically easier challenge this year. Granted, all three of Colorado’s losses were by one score, and the Buffaloes could score an upset or two down the stretch (especially with more stable QB play). But TCU should control the line of scrimmage in this one and move to 4-1.
Current line: TCU -13.5 (down from -15.5) | SP+ projection: TCU by 12.4 | FPI projection: TCU by 9.0
UNLV at Wyoming (7 p.m., CBSSN). UNLV is unbeaten and has scored at least 30 points in every game; the Rebels’ defense, however, is dreadful, especially against the run. Wyoming backs Samuel Harris and Sam Scott are both strong yards-after-contact players, and the Cowboys might have a shot at making this one awkward for an ambitious conference rival.
Current line: UNLV -3.5 (down from -5.5) | SP+ projection: UNLV by 4.9 | FPI projection: UNLV by 6.6
Late Saturday
Duke at California (10:30 p.m., ESPN). Washington-Maryland feels like the most geographically ridiculous conference game of the week, but this one isn’t much better. It’s a pretty big one, though, with the teams a combined 3-0 in ACC play. Duke’s offense (31st in points per drive) facing Cal’s defense (29th) could be appointment viewing. Cal’s offense (86th) against Duke’s defense (99th), not so much.
Current line: Duke -2.5 | SP+ projection: Duke by 6.1 | FPI projection: Duke by 2.9
Nevada at Fresno State (10:30 p.m., CBSSN). Since a poor Week 0 performance against Kansas, Fresno State is unbeaten. Plus, the Bulldogs are projected underdogs in only one remaining game, meaning they’re Mountain West contenders until proven otherwise. Nevada doesn’t have much to offer, but the Wolf Pack have a randomly explosive run game with backs Herschel Turner and Caleb Ramseur.
Current line: Fresno -13.5 | SP+ projection: Fresno by 18.9 | FPI projection: Fresno by 14.7
Smaller-school showcase
Let’s once again save a shout-out for the glorious lower levels of the sport. Here are three games you should track.
FCS: Yale at No. 8 Lehigh (noon, ESPN+). We’re looking at a ferocious Ivy League race among Harvard (fourth in FCS SP+), Yale (10th) and Dartmouth (18th) — one that has FCS playoff implications because the Ivy is sending a team now. But first, Yale gets a huge nonconference showdown with a Lehigh team that has won 11 of its past 12 games thanks, in part, to backs Luke Yoder and Jaden Green (combined: 207.2 rushing yards per game) and a ferocious and diverse pass rush.
SP+ projection: Lehigh by 1.8.
Division III: No. 5 Wisconsin-La Crosse at No. 10 Wisconsin-Whitewater (2 p.m., local streaming). It’s the first weekend of one of college football’s most exciting conference races: the WIAC, which has four of the top 11 teams in Division III, based on SP+. Two of them meet Saturday. Whitewater has dominated this series through most of the 2000s, but La Crosse, led by prolific quarterback Kyle Haas, has won the past two games.
SP+ projection: UWW by 6.4.
Division II: No. 9 UT Permian Basin at No. 5 Angelo State (7 p.m., FloCollege). Angelo State is unbeaten and averaging 39 points per game this season behind backs Cameron Dischler and Jayden Jones and a relentless, deep run game. UTPB? Also unbeaten and averaging 38.8 points per game thanks to quarterback Kanon Gibson and a prolific passing game. Track meet: likely.
SP+ projection: Angelo State by 7.6.
Sports
Source: LaCombe extension richest ever for Ducks
Published
5 hours agoon
October 3, 2025By
admin
-
Greg WyshynskiOct 2, 2025, 02:43 PM ET
Close- Greg Wyshynski is ESPN’s senior NHL writer.
The Anaheim Ducks have locked up defenseman Jackson LaCombe, a key part of their rebuilding team, on an eight-year contract extension, the team announced Thursday.
The deal carries a $9 million average annual value, a source told ESPN on Thursday, the same AAV as the deal defenseman Luke Hughes signed with the New Jersey Devils on Wednesday, although that was on a seven-year term.
LaCombe’s contract is the largest ever given out by the Ducks and will begin in the 2026-27 season and end in 2033-34. He has one year left on a two-year bridge deal ($925,000 AAV) that he signed in 2024.
Anaheim general manager Pat Verbeek said extending LaCombe was “a priority” for the team and that the young defenseman has “all of the tools to be an anchor on our back end for many years to come.”
“Both sides were looking at long-term deals, so I think it came together pretty quickly,” Verbeek said after the Ducks’ practice in Irvine, California. “What we’re all trying to gauge the landscape of where salaries are going [with the future NHL salary cap], so I feel really comfortable with the contract and the character of Jackson LaCombe. And the player, and I still think there’s lots of upside and growth in his game. I think the best is still to come from Jackson.”
LaCombe, 24, was selected No. 39 in the 2019 NHL draft. He has 60 points in 148 NHL games, with a career-best 14 goals and 29 assists in 75 games last season for the Ducks as he formed an effective pairing with bruising veteran defenseman Radko Gudas.
LaCombe said it was an “easy decision” to go long term in Anaheim.
“I love it here,” LaCombe said. “I love being here. I love playing here. I love all my teammates here, too, so for me it was an easy decision. … It’s easy to live here. You could say the weather [is a positive] and the place is so nice, but just the group we have has been great for me. Everybody has been so welcoming for the last two years, so I’m grateful for that and I’m just excited to be here for a long time.”
A Minnesota alum, LaCombe was invited to the U.S. men’s Olympic orientation camp, putting him in contention for a spot on the 2026 men’s hockey team that will contend for gold in Italy. LaCombe helped the U.S. win gold at the 2025 world championships — the Americans’ first gold at the event in 92 years.
LaCombe is the first player to re-sign in the Ducks’ large class of restricted free agents coming up next summer. He was slated to be an RFA alongside center Leo Carlsson, left wing Cutter Gauthier and defensemen Olen Zellweger and Pavel Mintyukov.
“Jackson is the first domino to fall, and we’re working on other stuff as well,” Verbeek said.
Overall, LaCombe is the second big signing for Verbeek in the past week. The Ducks and restricted free agent center Mason McTavish agreed to a six-year, $42 million extension Saturday, ending a contentious negotiation that kept him out of training camp.
Anaheim is seeking its first playoff berth since 2018.
Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment12 months ago
Here are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024