Connect with us

Published

on

The UK is in talks with “a number of countries” about sending failed asylum seekers to return hubs in third countries, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

The prime minister confirmed the plan at a press conference alongside his Albanian counterpart Edi Rama, in which the pair announced plans to strengthen cooperation on illegal migration.

Politics Live: Britain’s economy grew more than expected in first quarter of 2025

Sir Keir described the hubs as a “really important innovation” that complements other measures the government is taking to crack down on criminal smuggling gangs.

“We are in talks with a number of countries about return hubs,” he said.

“At the appropriate time, I’ll be able to give you further details in relation to it.”

Sir Keir did not say which countries he is in talks with, but the subject is understood not to be on the agenda for his meetings in Tirana on Thursday.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Are ‘return hubs’ the new Rwanda plan?

Mr Rama suggested he is not open to hosting UK detention centres, telling reporters: “We have been asked by several countries if we were open to it, and we said no, because we are loyal to the marriage with Italy and the rest is just love.”

The Italian scheme was intended to provide offshore processing for migrants, but that plan has been held up by legal action.

Keir Starmer attends a bilateral meeting with Edi Rama at the Kryeministria, Tirana, Albania.
Pic: PA
Image:
Keir Starmer attends a bilateral meeting with Edi Rama. Pic: PA

Following the press conference, Downing Street said the return hubs will target asylum seekers whose applications have been rejected and who are seeking to frustrate their deportation or have lost their paperwork.

By removing them to another country, the government hopes to reduce their ability to find other reasons to prevent deportation, such as starting a family.

The prime minister’s official spokesman said: “This will basically apply to people who have exhausted all legal routes to remain in the UK but are attempting to stall, using various tactics, whether it’s losing their paperwork or using other tactics to frustrate their removal.

“It will ensure that they don’t have the chance to make their removal harder by using tactics such as starting a family, et cetera, as we have seen from cases in the past.

“That obviously will reduce the cost to the taxpayer.”

Return hubs are a different concept from the Tories’ Rwanda scheme, which Sir Keir scrapped almost immediately after winning the general election.

Keir Starmer is shown the procedures carried out by search teams as they check vehicles arriving in the ferry port from Italy in Tirana, Albania.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
The prime minister is shown the procedures carried out by search teams checking vehicles arriving in the ferry port from Italy in Tirana. Pic: Reuters

The Rwanda plan involved deporting all people who arrived in the UK by unauthorised means to the east African country, where their asylum claims would be processed for them to settle there, not in Britain.

It ultimately failed to get off the ground before the Tories lost the election, despite millions spent, after it was repeatedly challenged in the courts.

Return hubs ‘a con’

Shadow home office minister Chris Philp insisted on Thursday that it would have acted as a deterrent, whereas the return hubs are a “con on the British public”.

He said: “It’s better than nothing but it won’t work because most of the people crossing the Channel are of nationalities where they will get their asylum claims granted.

“It’s a con on the British public for Keir Starmer to claim these return hubs will have any practical effect.”

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

Mr Philp also called it a “slap in the face” and “humiliation” for the prime minister that Albania has already rejected the idea.

He said Sir Keir travelled all that way to “announce a few tweaks” to a cooperation deal on illegal immigration that was struck by the Conservatives in 2022.

Read More:
What are return hubs and how will they work?
What are Sir Keir Starmer’s new immigration rules?

Boat crossings pass 12,000

In 2022, arrivals from Albania accounted for around a third of all small boat crossings – a higher number than from any other country.

Over the past three years, those numbers have been cut by 95%. The number of Albanians returned to their home country has also more than doubled to 5,294 last year, from just over 2,000 two years earlier.

Sir Keir is the first British prime minister to travel to Albania for bilateral talks.

Other announcements he is due to make include expanding a programme to detect migrants attempting to travel using fake or stolen documents, with the UK donating new anti-forgery machines.

The visit comes in the same week that the number of people crossing the Channel in small boats passed 12,000 for the year.

The figure puts 2025 on course to be a record year for crossings – something which will cause unease for Labour as it was elected on a manifesto promise to “smash the gangs”.

The government is under pressure to act tough on immigration amid Reform UK’s meteoric rise in the polls. Earlier this week, Sir Keir announced plans to crack down on legal migration, including banning care homes from hiring overseas.

Continue Reading

Politics

WazirX users approve restructuring plan again after court rebuff

Published

on

By

WazirX users approve restructuring plan again after court rebuff

WazirX users approve restructuring plan again after court rebuff

WazirX has been trying to get a restructuring plan through the Singapore High Court to start returning funds to users impacted by the $234 million hack in 2024.

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour smell dirty tricks over asylum hotel court ruling – but the risks are clear

Published

on

By

Labour smell dirty tricks over asylum hotel court ruling - but the risks are clear

“It’s an interesting moment,” was how one government source described the High Court ruling that will force an Essex hotel to be emptied of asylum seekers within weeks.

That may prove to be the understatement of the summer.

For clues as to why, just take a glance at what the Home Office’s own lawyer told the court on Tuesday.

Granting the injunction “runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests”, the barrister said – pointing out that similar legal claims by other councils would “aggravate pressures on the asylum estate”.

Right on cue and just hours after the ruling came in, Broxbourne Council – over the border in Hertfordshire – posted online that it was urgently seeking legal advice with a view to taking similar court action.

The risks here are clear.

Police officers ahead of a demonstration outside The Bell Hotel. Pic: PA
Image:
Police officers ahead of a demonstration outside The Bell Hotel. Pic: PA

Recent figures show just over 30,000 asylum seekers being housed in hotels across the country.

If they start to empty out following a string of court claims, the Home Office will struggle to find alternative options.

After all, they are only in hotels because of a lack of other types of accommodation.

There are several caveats though.

This is just an interim injunction that will be heard in full in the autumn.

So the court could swing back in favour of the hotel chain – and by extension the Home Office.

Read more:
Who says what on asylum hotels?

Protesters in Epping on 8 August. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Protesters in Epping on 8 August. Pic: Reuters

We have been here before

Remember, this isn’t the first legal claim of this kind.

Other councils have tried to leverage the power of the courts to shut down asylum hotels, with varying degrees of success.

In 2022, Ipswich Borough Council failed to get an extension to an interim injunction to prevent migrants being sent to a Novotel in the town.

As in Epping, lawyers argued there had been a change in use under planning rules.

The hotel has been the scene of regular protests. Pic: PA
Image:
The hotel has been the scene of regular protests. Pic: PA

But the judge eventually decided that the legal duty the Home Office has to provide accommodation for asylum seekers was more important.

So there may not be a direct read across from this case to other councils.

Home Office officials are emphasising this injunction was won on the grounds of planning laws rather than national issues such as public order, and as such, each case will be different.

Failing Labour approach or Tory tricks?

But government sources also smell dirty tricks from Epping Council and are suggesting that the Tory-led local authority made the legal claim for political reasons.

Pointing to the presence of several prominent Tory MPs in the Essex area – as well as the threat posed by Reform in the county – the question being posed is why this legal challenge was not brought when asylum seekers first started being sent to the hotel in 2020 during the Conservatives‘ time in government.

Epping Council would no doubt reject that and say recent disorder prompted them to act.

But that won’t stop the Tories and Reform of seizing on this as evidence of a failing approach from Labour.

So there are political risks for the government, yes, but it’s the practicalities that could flow from this ruling that pose the bigger danger.

Continue Reading

Politics

Top Fed official: Staff should be allowed to hold a little crypto

Published

on

By

Top Fed official: Staff should be allowed to hold a little crypto

Top Fed official: Staff should be allowed to hold a little crypto

Federal Reserve vice chair for supervision, Michelle Bowman, says the central bank should roll back its restrictions that ban staff from buying crypto.

Continue Reading

Trending