Connect with us

Published

on

Last week, Sir Keir Starmer voiced his worry Britain could become an “island of strangers” if immigration was not tackled.

Some claimed this was a controversial and dangerous stance – drawing parallels with Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood speech.

But research released today suggests close to half of those in Great Britain feel like “strangers” in their own country.

Politics latest: Follow live updates

The survey, carried out by pollsters at More In Common, asked 13,464 people in Great Britain for their feelings on the matter.

And what is even more surprising is that the survey was carried out over a month before Sir Keir‘s speech.

The research is only being released today, and it is understood that Downing Street had not seen it before the prime minister’s speech.

More on Keir Starmer

However it will likely be welcomed as a justification of a position aimed outside of Westminster.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘We risk becoming an island of strangers’

Isolation linked to wealth

The prime minister’s concerns about Great Britain being an “island of strangers” was inextricably linked to rising immigration.

But the research out today shows the isolation felt by many is strongly linked to wealth – with the poorest in the country more likely to feel like strangers.

The cost of living was mentioned as a contributory factor by many of those asked.

And when it comes to ethnic breakdown of those saying they feel like strangers, Asian or Asian British people were more likely than either white or black British people to say they felt separate.

Amy, a teacher from Runcorn, told researchers that when “your money’s all going on your bills and the boring stuff like food and gas and leccy and petrol” there is nothing left “to do for ourselves”.

Read more:
Reform tops polls for first time

Reform surge in estimated national vote

Who is Starmer targeting?

Those who criticised Sir Keir for his “strangers” speech tended to accuse the prime minister of appealing to supporters of Reform or the Conservatives.

Suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana went as far as to claim the speech was a “foghorn to the far right”.

The analysis from More in Common found that people who supported Reform and the Conservatives last year are indeed much more likely to feel like strangers in the UK.

While Labour, Lib Dem and Green supporters are all less likely to feel like strangers, around a third of them do still agree with the statement that they “sometimes feel like a stranger in my own country”.

And the polling also found that Reform and Conservative voters are much more likely to think that multiculturalism threatens national identity, while supporters of the other three parties tend to largely believe multiculturalism is a benefit.

Polling from More In Common on stranger/loneliness. Pic: More in Common

Across the board, supporters of all parties were more likely than not to think that everyone needs to do more to encourage integration between people of different ethnic backgrounds – and similarly a majority think it is everyone’s responsibility to do so.

Luke Tryl, the UK director of More in Common, said: “The prime minister’s warning that we risk becoming an ‘island of strangers’ resonates with millions who say they feel disconnected from those around them.

“But it would be a mistake to say that immigration and lack of integration are the sole causes of our fragmenting social fabric.”

John McDonnell, another former Labour MP, now suspended, told Sky News that having politicians “exploit” resentment fuelled by economic circumstance to shift “the blame onto migrants just exacerbates the problem”.

He said the government needs to “tackle the insecurity of people’s lives and you lay the foundations of a cohesive society”.

With Reform now leading in the polls and the collapse of support for Sir Keir since becoming prime minister, it is unsurprising that what he says seems to match up with what turquoise voters feel.

Labour MP Zarah Sultana, speaks during a protest in Whitehall, London, during the nurses strike, against the Bill on minimum service levels during strikes. Picture date: Wednesday January 18, 2023.
Image:
Zarah Sultana was one of many critics of Sir Keir Starmer. Pic: PA

Work from home alone

The post-pandemic shift to working from home and spending more time alone has also been blamed for an increased feeling of isolation.

Ruqayyah, a support worker from Peterborough, said the shift to home offices had “destroyed our young generation”.

But there are many other reasons that people feel separate from the rest of their country.

Read more:
Internet may help older people’s mental health

No evidence of ‘two-tier policing’ in handling of Southport

Young people are less trusting of strangers, and there is also a deep discontent with the political system.

Many think the system is “rigged” in favour of the wealthy – although this belief is less common the higher the level of education someone has completed.

The tension that exploded during last year’s riots are also highlighted, and many people are worried about religious differences – a situation exacerbated by foreign conflicts like in the Middle East and between India and Pakistan.

The research was carried out alongside the campaign group Citizens UK and UCL.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Matthew Bolton, executive director of Citizens UK, said: “We all saw what can happen last summer when anger and mistrust boil over and threaten the fabric of our society.

“The answers to this don’t lie in Whitehall.

“By listening to people closest to the ground about what causes division and what builds unity in their neighbourhood, we can build a blueprint for cohesion rooted in local leadership and community power.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Prediction markets bet on Coinbase-linked Hassett as top Fed pick

Published

on

By

Prediction markets bet on Coinbase-linked Hassett as top Fed pick

Prediction markets Polymarket and Kalshi view Kevin Hassett, US President Donald Trump’s National Economic Council director, as the favorite to replace Jerome Powell as the next Federal Reserve chair.

The odds of Hassett filling the seat have spiked to 66% on Polymarket and 74% on Kalshi at the time of writing. Hassett is widely viewed as crypto‑friendly thanks to his past role on Coinbase’s advisory council, a disclosed seven‑figure stake in the exchange and his leadership of the White House digital asset working group.​

Founder and CEO of Wyoming-based Custodia Bank, and a prominent advocate for crypto-friendly regulations, Caitlin Long, commented on X:

“If this comes true & Hassett does become Fed chairman, anti-#crypto people at the Fed who still hold positions of power will finally be out (well, most of them anyway). BIG changes will be coming to the Fed.”

Source: Polymarket Money

Related: Crypto-friendly Trump adviser Hassett top pick for Fed chair: Report

Kevin Hassett’s crypto credentials

Hassett is a long-time Republican policy economist who returned to Washington as Trump’s top economic adviser and has now emerged as the market-implied frontrunner to lead the Fed.

His financial disclosure reveals at least a seven‑figure Coinbase stake and compensation for serving on the exchange’s Academic and Regulatory Advisory Council, placing him unusually close to the crypto industry for a potential Fed chair.​

Still, crypto has been burned before by reading too much into “crypto‑literate” resumes. Gary Gensler arrived at the Securities and Exchange Commission with MIT blockchain courses under his belt, but went on to preside over a wave of high‑profile enforcement actions, some of which critics branded as “Operation Chokepoint 2.0.”

A Hassett-led Fed might be more open to experimentation and less reflexively hostile to bank‑crypto activity. Still, the institution’s mandate on financial stability means markets should not assume a one‑way bet on deregulation.​

Related: Caitlin Long’s crypto bank loses appeal over Fed master account

Supervision pushback inside the Fed

The Hassett odds have jumped just as the Fed’s own approach to bank supervision has received pushback from veterans like Fed Governor Michael Barr, who earned his reputation as one of Operation Chokepoint 2.0’s key architects.

According to Caitlin Long, while he Barr “was Vice Chairman of Supervision & Regulation he did Warren’s bidding,” and he “has made it clear he will oppose changes made by Trump & his appointees.”

On Nov. 18, the Fed released new Supervisory Operating Principles that shift examiners toward a “risk‑first” framework, directing staff to focus on material safety‑and‑soundness risks rather than procedural or documentation issues.

In a speech the same day, Barr warned that narrowing oversight, weakening ratings frameworks and making it harder to issue enforcement actions or matters requiring attention could leave supervisors slower to act on emerging risks, arguing that gutting those tools may repeat pre‑crisis mistakes.​

Days later, in Consumer Affairs Letter 25‑1, the Fed clarified that the new Supervisory Operating Principles do not apply to its Consumer Affairs supervision program (an area under Barr’s committee as a governor).

If prediction markets are right and a crypto‑friendly Hassett inherits this landscape, his Fed would not be writing on a blank slate but stepping into an institution already mid‑pivot on how hard (and where) it leans on banks.