Connect with us

Published

on

The number of couples deciding to get a prenup is increasing, with one law firm telling Money it has seen requests double in the last year. 

It is estimated that more than 20% of all married couples in the country have signed one of these agreements.

So, what are they, and why are so many of us opting for one? The Money team took a look…

A quick rundown of what a prenup is

A prenup is a legal arrangement made by a couple before they marry or enter a civil partnership, which sets out plans for how their assets should be divided if they divorce or have their civil partnership dissolved.

They are not legally binding, but thanks to a landmark ruling in 2010, courts are expected to uphold prenups that have been entered into freely.

However, courts are still able to make decisions on a case-by-case basis, meaning prenups that appear to have been entered under pressure or written up particularly unfairly might not be given as much weight.

Four reasons why they have become more popular

The landmark ruling

Prenups used to be associated with the ultra wealthy and famous, but after the Radmacher v Granatino ruling, people became more aware of them, Charlotte Lanning from Edward’s Family Law told Money.

After that decision, prenups agreed by celebrity couples made headlines across the country, making them appear “glitzy” and desirable, she said.

“When I was first starting out, I would do prenups on the odd occasion, whereas now we always have a couple on the go each,” the associate solicitor said.

Charlotte Lanning
Image:
Charlotte Lanning

Getting married later

While the ruling was a factor, Lanning thinks the more recent increase in prenups has been driven by changes in society. People are getting married later and are less worried about looking unromantic.

“The fact that people are getting married a lot later in life… means there is more to argue over,” Lanning said, explaining that the older people are, the more likely they are to own businesses, properties or other assets.

The bank of mum and dad

A lot of her clients were also relying more on the “bank of mum and dad” to fund big purchases, such as the deposit on a first home.

Lanning said this made wealth inequities more obvious, putting prenups at the “forefront of people’s minds” before they get married.

Changing attitudes

The Marriage Foundation thinktank has been looking at prenups for years, and its founder and former judge Sir Paul Coleridge told Money that changing attitudes were a big driver in the uptick.

“The old Victorian view was that it was wrong to have people talking about what should happen when a marriage broke down when the clear intention was to stay married for life,” he said.

“I’m a convert. I felt quite strongly that it was wrong to start discussing divorce before marriage, but I have completely changed my mind.

“People do quite often want to have a discussion about what should happen in the worst case.”

Sir Paul Coleridge
Image:
Sir Paul Coleridge

He explained that despite the stereotype of a rich man paying off a younger, poorer wife, that was no longer the case either.

“You find people getting married now are very established financially and have made a great deal of money on their own, and this is men and women,” he said.

“It’s certainly not only applicable to men paying women. Nowadays, it’s very frequent to be the other way around.”

Who is signing them?

Lanning said a typical client was often a high net worth individual, but it was becoming more common for young people who are in line to receive a large inheritance to get a prenup.

“A lot of the ones I have done recently have been quite interesting because it is more to do with future inheritance,” she said.

“One of the parties that is getting married won’t necessarily have the money yet, but the prenup is to make sure that if they do receive it during the marriage, that it is protected.”

Read the latest Money news live

She explained that parents can be the driving force of these agreements, with many wanting to make sure their child keeps hold of their inheritance.

Then there are divorcees. Lanning said people who used her firm for their divorce proceedings will return when they’re considering getting married for a second time.

“We see it often with second marriages, particularly if the parties have children from a previous marriage or relationship. Obviously, the older you are, the more money you’ve got because you’ve had longer to build it up.”

Sir Paul stressed that prenups were not necessary for every couple, so people should consider them carefully before signing one.

Pic: iStock
Image:
Pic: iStock

What do they include?

A prenup can cover a range of topics, with Sir Paul saying he has seen some in the US that set out bizarre requirements such as the number of times a couple must have sex.

Typically, it will cover property, savings, inheritance, stocks and shares, income, business interests, pension pots, and premium bonds.

In the UK, a prenup cannot include child custody arrangements, personal matters, illegal activities, or lifestyle issues.

When writing up a prenup, Lanning said property was the most common point of contention.

“It might specify that a home becomes joint property or it will stay separate,” she said.

“When there’s not a lot of money involved, the court will normally be looking at what the weaker financial party needs in order to rehouse.

“You will quite often have a clause in there that says after a certain number of years, you can have a specific amount to rehouse, or you can have a property in a certain area, with a set number of bedrooms.

“It just provides a bit of structure to try to temper down people’s needs,” she explained.

“There is a broad spectrum of what you can assert. The whole point of it is to try to stop arguments later down the line.”

How long do they take and how much do they cost?

The simple answer to both questions is that it completely depends on how complex the agreement is.

Lanning said the general rule is that a prenup should be signed 28 days before a couple gets married.

She said it’s “absolutely great” if people contact a solicitor about a prenup around six months before their wedding.

“That way, you can get the advice on what they do, what the process is, and then a lot of couples discuss it among themselves to decide what they want to achieve. Then they come with their practical realities, and we basically make it legal,” she said.

Read more from Money:
Fans lose £16,500 on Glastonbury tickets
Seven things you might not know about Elon Musk

What happens now to Trump’s tariffs?

“Any earlier and you risk the financial disclosure then being out of date, which doesn’t help.”

Sir Paul said that when dealing with a high net worth family, the whole process could cost upwards of £10,000.

But in typical cases, people should be thinking “in terms of thousands” for the final cost.

How should you handle having the prenup conversation?

While people are less likely to find conversations around prenups uncomfortable nowadays, talking about money can still be difficult.

Amy Harris, legal director at advisory firm Brabners Personal, said having a chat about prenups tends to be easier when the issue is family money or inherited wealth.

“A prenup is sometimes a condition of them receiving any gifts or inheritance at all; it therefore comes across less personal between the couple themselves,” she said.

“We find that having full and frank financial discussions at the start of marriage can be enlightening and a good basis upon which to start their future together – with openness and transparency and a commitment to dealing with separation as amicably as possible.

“It is also important to remember that these agreements often work both ways in terms of any provisions that protect the prior assets of one party, which can also protect the prior assets of the other.”

Continue Reading

UK

Police appeal after man charged with murdering two women and raping third

Published

on

By

Police appeal after man charged with murdering two women and raping third

Police have appealed for information after a man was charged with murdering two women and raping a third.

Simon Levy has been charged with murdering 53-year-old Carmenza Valencia-Trujillo who died on the Aylesbury Estate, south-east London, on 17 March, the Metropolitan Police said.

In September, Levy, of Beaufoy Road, Tottenham, north London, was charged with murdering 39-year-old Sheryl Wilkins who was found unresponsive in High Road, Tottenham, on 24 August.

He is also accused of grievous bodily harm with intent, non-fatal strangulation and two counts of rape against a third woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, in Haringey, north London, on 21 January, police said.

The 40-year-old will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday charged with Ms Valencia-Trujillo’s murder.

Sheryl Wilkins was found unresponsive in High Road, Tottenham, on 24 August. Pic: Metropolitan Police
Image:
Sheryl Wilkins was found unresponsive in High Road, Tottenham, on 24 August. Pic: Metropolitan Police

He is also due to appear at the Old Bailey on Wednesday for a plea and trial preparation hearing for the murder of Ms Wilkins.

Detectives believe there may be individuals who have information relevant to this investigation – or who are yet to report incidents which have directly impacted them – and are asking for people to come forward.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the latest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Family of woman killed 56 years ago, in a case of mistaken identity, believe her remains are buried in a garden

Published

on

By

Family of woman killed 56 years ago, in a case of mistaken identity, believe her remains are buried in a garden

The family of murder victim Muriel McKay believe her remains are buried in a garden in east London, the High Court has heard.

Ms McKay was officially declared dead by a High Court judge earlier this month, 56 years after being kidnapped.

The 55-year-old was taken from her London home by Nizamodeen and his brother Arthur Hosein in December 1969.

They mistook her for Anna, the wife of media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

Ms McKay’s husband was newspaper executive Alick McKay, the deputy to newspaper mogul Rupert Murdoch.

The kidnappers realised their mistake, but still demanded a £1m ransom for her safe return.

Read more:
Muriel McKay’s family want Met chief to intervene
Murder victim family’s concerns over farm search

More from UK

The two Hosein brothers were convicted and jailed for life in one of the first murder trials without a body. Arthur Hosein died in prison.

On Monday, barristers for two of Ms McKay’s children, Ian McKay and Dianne Levinson, asked a judge to order that the homeowners of two neighbouring properties on Bethnal Green Road allow the family to conduct a “ground-penetrating radar survey” of a shared back garden.

One of the homeowners, Madeleine Higson, opposes the injunction bid, which would also stop her from disturbing the garden.

Mr Justice Richard Smith said he will hand down his judgment at 2pm on Tuesday, stating the case involved “not uncomplicated legal sensitivities”.

Speaking following the hearing, Ms McKay’s grandson Mark Dyer said the bid to discover her remains was “important to the whole family”.

He said: “We do not want to be felt sorry for, we just actually want to get on and … scan the place, check for my grandmother.

“We’ve been told she’s there, most probably there, so we need to pick her up.

“She would like to come home for Christmas this year and what is left of her is purely some remains, some bones.

“They should find a place where the family can go and visit, where whoever’s interested in what happened to her should go and visit, and that’s the right thing to do.”

Continue Reading

UK

UK to launch new ‘national day’ to remember victims and survivors of terrorism

Published

on

By

UK to launch new 'national day' to remember victims and survivors of terrorism

A new “national day” to honour victims and survivors of terrorism will be added to the calendar from next year, it has been revealed.

The annual commemoration will fall on 21 August, and will be marked in a different place each year to recognise the widespread impact of terrorism around the country.

It comes after a 12-week public consultation showed 91% supported the plan for a national day, and 84% strongly supported the proposal.

Flowers left in St Ann's Square, Manchester, to remember the Manchester Arena terror attack. Pic: PA
Image:
Flowers left in St Ann’s Square, Manchester, to remember the Manchester Arena terror attack. Pic: PA

How the day will look, including a final name and symbol, will be worked out collaboratively between survivors and ministers, according to the Home Office.

But it will “honour and remember victims and survivors of terrorism”, encouraging survivors to access specialist support, spotlighting their stories, and educating the public.

A spokesperson for the Home Office confirmed that it would not be a bank holiday.

Jo Berry, whose father Sir Anthony Berry was killed in the IRA Brighton hotel bombing in 1984, said victims of terrorism would no longer be “a footnote of history”.

Jo Berry, whose father was killed in the Brighton bombing in 1984, with convicted bomber Patrick Magee in 2004. File pic: PA
Image:
Jo Berry, whose father was killed in the Brighton bombing in 1984, with convicted bomber Patrick Magee in 2004. File pic: PA

She said: “What we remember as a nation matters. It sends a signal about what we value.

“For too long, survivors of terror attacks, and those who have been killed in them, have been a footnote of history. Survivors have felt ignored and forgotten.

“That’s why Survivors Against Terror launched a campaign for a new national day of memorial three years ago.”

Read more:
Referrals to UK counter-terrorism programme reach new high
I was reporting in London during 7/7 – here’s what happened

Travis Frain, who survived the Westminster Bridge attack in 2017, also backed the campaign.

He said: “A national day would provide an opportunity to remember those we have lost, to pay tribute to the bravery and resilience of those who have survived these heinous acts, and for us to look forward to the future to educate the next generation.”

The date was chosen to coincide with the UN International Day of Remembrance and Tribute to the Victims of Terrorism.

Plans have also been announced for a new support hub to help victims in the aftermath of terror attacks.

Continue Reading

Trending