Connect with us

Published

on

LOS ANGELES — The Juan Soto the New York Mets expected when they gave him the richest contract in sports history finally appeared in his purest form Wednesday night at Dodger Stadium by stealing the show without even putting the ball in play.

Twice, in his second and third plate appearances, Soto engaged in theatrical seven-pitch battles with Dodgers right-hander Tony Gonsolin. And twice he won with enthralling walks, commanding attention as much between pitches as during the action.

He flashed smiles waiting for Gonsolin’s pitches, after taking pitches, and after cracking a line drive just foul down the right-field line. He nodded and he shook his head. He backpedaled and he high-stepped. He strutted his hips and he Soto Shuffled. By the end, after checking a swing to take his second walk and daring Gonsolin to throw over to first base, he and Gonsolin were jawing at each other.

He was loose. He was confident. He was finally Juan Soto, the showman.

“It’s Juan Soto being Juan Soto,” Mets manager Carlos Mendoza said.

That Juan Soto was absent during his first two months with the Mets as he failed to perform to his lofty standards. Various underlying metrics — expected batting average, expected slugging percentage, hard-hit percentage, chase rate, among others — suggest he was a victim of misfortune, but results are results. And the results — a .224 batting average and .745 OPS through May 28 — were disappointing for a superstar in his age-26 season.

“Soto’s been Soto for us,” Mets co-hitting coach Jeremy Barnes said. “He just hasn’t had the batted ball luck to go with it. And he’s been aware of that.”

Beyond the production, Soto’s demeanor over the season’s first two months was notably different from his usual comportment. He has drawn external criticism more than once for a lack of hustle, and his trademark flair in the batter’s box has rarely been on display. His interactions with teammates have been dissected and analyzed. His body language has been placed under a microscope. He’s heard boos. The noise has been constant.

Before Wednesday’s game, a 6-1 Mets win, Soto, who is playing on his fourth team in four seasons, admitted adapting to his new organization and the weight of a $765 million contract has been a challenge.

“I still need a little more time, but little by little it’s been getting better,” Soto told ESPN in Spanish, when asked about feeling 100% himself amid all of the changes and additional pressure. “I’ve been feeling more comfortable.”

Behind the scenes, Soto said he’s leaned on Mendoza as he adjusts to his surroundings. The two “talk a lot,” Soto said, with a level of transparency he called important.

Mendoza said their talks are almost never about what’s happening on the field. The topics range from family to their home countries (Soto is from the Dominican Republic and Mendoza hails from Venezuela) to their previous experiences in the sport.

They chat periodically — once a week or biweekly — when Mendoza senses the moment is right. It’s an approach Mendoza said he takes with all of his players, especially ones new to the organization. The effort has resonated with Soto.

“We have good conversations that, at the end of the day, help me feel better acclimated to the team,” Soto said.

Last Friday, before New York opened a three-game set against the historically abysmal Colorado Rockies, Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns emphasized Soto’s work behind the scenes was not an issue. He said he did not see an issue Soto needed to repair. But he acknowledged Soto is “trying to do a little bit too much right now.”

“He certainly wants results at a higher level than what we’ve seen so far,” Stearns said. “I’m pretty confident we’re going to get those. But I also understand it is natural when a player signs a big contract — and this was a really big contract — if the results aren’t immediate, there are going to be questions and there are going to be reactions. And I completely get that. And I think Juan does too.”

Soto went 2-for-4 with a double and a stolen base in a win that night to begin a week of encouraging production. The sample size is miniscule, but Soto has recorded six hits, eight walks and just two strikeouts — adding up to a .484 on-base percentage — over his last seven games against the Rockies and Dodgers.

Before Wednesday — when he went 0-for-1 with three walks and an RBI — he had clubbed three home runs in four games and recorded extra-base hits in five consecutive contests by being more aggressive on pitches in the strike zone — he swung at only 53% of pitches in the zone in May — while continuing to hit the ball hard.

Soto has posted similar mini stretches this season, displaying flashes of the talent that had franchises bidding astronomical amounts of money for his services. But he’s expected to sustain an elite output.

He went hitless with two walks in Thursday’s series finale in Los Angeles — a 6-5 loss for the Mets — and is still batting just .229 with a .797 OPS, 11 home runs and a league-leading 50 walks in 62 games this season. The numbers pale in comparison to the .285 batting average and .953 OPS he registered over his first seven seasons.

“It’s a little difficult because it’s frustrating not seeing the results in what you’re doing,” Soto said. “It’s uncomfortable. You try to help the team as much as you can. But I have a good routine. I have confidence in it, and I know I’ve done it for all these years, all these days, so I have plenty of confidence in it to get the results I want.”

Mets starter Clay Holmes witnessed Soto produce the results he wanted last season as his teammate on the New York Yankees. Soto mashed a career-high 41 home runs with a .989 OPS in his platform year, finishing third in American League MVP voting and collaborating with Aaron Judge to create the most dangerous one-two punch in the majors as the Yankees advanced to the World Series.

“I still feel like I’m still watching the same guy,” Holmes said. “I don’t feel like something’s just crazy off. Looks like the same guy to me.”

On Wednesday, Scott Boras, the man who negotiated Soto’s record-smashing contract, called Soto’s return to Yankee Stadium in mid-May — when he received relentless boos and vulgar chants over a three-game series — a “hurdle” in his acclimation process. “It was the first time he got to see a lot of his old teammates and they accomplished a lot together.”

“It’s psychological,” Boras said of the transition. “It’s different. You’re treated differently because of your contract status. Everybody’s aware, and you kind of want it to be how it was, not how it is. And you have to learn the ‘is’ part, and it’s a new part of the process.”

A few hours later, Boras watched vintage Juan Soto resurface from his front-row seat behind home plate at Dodger Stadium. The Mets hope it was just the start.

“Little by little,” Soto said.

Continue Reading

Sports

Briscoe wins third straight pole at Michigan

Published

on

By

Briscoe wins third straight pole at Michigan

BROOKLYN, Mich. — Chase Briscoe won his third straight pole and NASCAR -high fourth this year at Michigan International Speedway on Saturday.

Briscoe, driving the No. 19 Toyota for Joe Gibbs Racing, turned a lap of 195.514 mph in qualifying on the 2-mile oval in the fastest pole in the Cup Series since Ryan Blaney went 200-plus mph at Texas in 2018.

He is aiming for his first win this year after five top-five finishes, and the third victory of his career.

“It will be nice starting up front and we’ve been able to do that now three weeks in a row but haven’t been able to execute with it,” Briscoe said. “So, hopefully third time is a charm.”

Kyle Busch, in the No. 8 Chevrolet, will start second Sunday in the FireKeepers Casino 400.

Denny Hamlin, in the No. 11 Toyota, qualified third and points leader William Byron, in the No. 24 Chevrolet, was fourth.

Defending race champion Tyler Reddick, in the No. 45 Toyota, will start 12th and for 23XI Racing, which is suing NASCAR.

Continue Reading

Sports

Hamlin undeterred by ruling siding with NASCAR

Published

on

By

Hamlin undeterred by ruling siding with NASCAR

BROOKLYN, Mich. — Denny Hamlin is unfazed that a three-judge federal appellate panel vacated an injunction that required NASCAR to recognize 23XI, which he owns with Michael Jordan, and Front Row as chartered teams as part of an antitrust lawsuit.

“That’s just such a small part of the entire litigation,” Hamlin said Saturday, a day ahead of the FireKeepers Casino 400. “I’m not deterred at all. We’re in good shape.”

Hamlin said Jordan feels the same way.

“He just remains very confident, just like I do,” Hamiln said.

NASCAR has not commented on the latest ruling.

23XI and Front Row sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. They asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season, but the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, on Thursday ruled in NASCAR’s favor.

“We’re looking at all options right now,” Hamlin said.

The teams, each winless this year, said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick’s contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car.

Hamlin insisted he’s not worried about losing drivers because of the uncertainty.

“I’m not focused on that particularly right this second,” he said.

Reddick, who was last year’s regular-season champion and competed for the Cup title in November, enters the race Sunday at Michigan ranked sixth in the Cup Series standings.

The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates.

The six teams may have to compete as “open” cars and would have to qualify on speed each week to make the race and would receive a fraction of the money.

Without a charter, Hamlin said it would cost the teams “tens of millions,” to run three cars.

“We’re committed to run this season open if we have to,” he said. “We’re going to race and fulfill all of our commitments no matter what. We’re here to race. Our team is going to be here for the long haul and we’re confident of that.”

The antitrust case isn’t scheduled to be heard until December.

NASCAR has not said what it would do with the six charters held by the two organizations if they are returned to the sanctioning body. There are 36 chartered cars for a 40-car field.

“We feel like facts were on our side,” Hamlin said. “I think if you listen to the judges, even they mentioned that we might be in pretty good shape.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Appellate judges rule for NASCAR in charter fight

Published

on

By

Appellate judges rule for NASCAR in charter fight

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A three-judge federal appellate panel ruled Thursday in favor of NASCAR in the antitrust lawsuit filed by two teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, and vacated an injunction that required 23XI and Front Row be recognized as chartered teams as their case snakes through the legal system.

Both race teams sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals.

The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. 23XI, which is owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, joined Front Row in suing NASCAR after 13 other organizations signed the renewals and those two organizations refused.

“We are disappointed by today’s ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and are reviewing the decision to determine our next steps,” said Jeffery Kessler, attorney for 23XI and Front Row. “This ruling is based on a very narrow consideration of whether a release of claims in the charter agreements is anti-competitive and does not impact our chances of winning at trial scheduled for Dec. 1.

“We remain confident in our case and committed to racing for the entirety of this season as we continue our fight to create a fair and just economic system for stock car racing that is free of anticompetitive, monopolistic conduct.”

The two teams sued and asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season. The antitrust case isn’t scheduled to be heard until December.

23XI and Front Row have 14 days to appeal to the full court, and the injunction has no bearings on the merits of the antitrust case.

The earliest NASCAR can treat the teams as unchartered — a charter guarantees their organizations a starting spot each week and prize money — is one week after the deadline to appeal, provided there is no pending appeal.

NASCAR has not said what it would do with the six charters held by the two organizations if they are returned to the sanctioning body. There are only 36 chartered cars for a 40-car field. If the teams do not appeal, the six entries would have to compete as “open” cars — which means they’d have to qualify on speed each week to make the race and they would receive a fraction of the money.

The teams said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick‘s contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car.

It’s not clear what would happen to Reddick’s contract. Last year’s regular-season champion goes to Michigan this weekend ranked sixth in the Cup Series standings. Both organizations are still seeking a win this season — Hamlin’s three victories are with Joe Gibbs Racing, the team he drives for.

The original judge ruled that NASCAR’s charter agreement likely violated antitrust law in granting the injunction. But when they heard arguments last month, the three judges at the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, indicated they were skeptical of that decision.

The judges said in Thursday’s ruling they were not aware of any case that supports the lower court’s theory of antitrust law, so they vacated the injunction.

“In short, because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participant to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory,” the court said. “And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.”

Continue Reading

Trending