As hundreds lie dead following the latest tragedy to beset a Boeing passenger plane, it is too early to determine blame.
Pilot error, engine failure and bird strikes are among the theories all being banded about. Only the recovery of Flight AI171‘s black box flight recorders are likely to provide the concrete answers.
What is inescapable though is that this is an air disaster the plane’s maker, Boeing, could well do without.
It sounds petty, in the midst of such a catastrophe, to be talking about the impact on a company, but this has been a civil aviation giant left deeply scarred, in the public eye, through its attitude to safety in recent years.
While the 787 Dreamliner’s record had been impressive up until today, the same can not be said for the company’s 737 MAX planes.
The entire fleet was grounded globally for almost two years following the demise of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 outside Addis Ababa in March 2019.
More from Money
Image: Women mourn next to the coffins of relatives who died in the Ethiopian Airlines crash in 2019. Pic: Reuters
All 157 people aboard were killed.
Six months earlier, a Lion Air 737 MAX, carrying 189 passengers and crew, crashed in Indonesia.
At fault was flight control software that has since been rectified.
That recent past continues to haunt Boeing.
It took those crashes to uncover a culture of cover-up. It amounted to not only a corporate failure but one of regulation and justice too, according to critics, as relatives were denied their days in court due to plea bargains.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:31
What happened to the Air India plane?
Just last month, the US Justice Department and Boeing agreed a non-prosecution agreement over those two fatal crashes in return for $1.1bn in fines and an admission that it obstructed the investigation.
It raises several questions over the US legal system and its ability to police corporate activity and incentivise playing by the rules.
Boeing safety record under scrutiny after first fatal Dreamliner crash
The crash of an Air India plane, carrying 242 people bound for Gatwick Airport from Ahmedabad, is the first fatal incident for Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner.
Experienced pilots who have studied video of the moments before the crash have told Sky News the flaps on the wings appear not to be set in the normal take-off position, however the cause of incident is unknown.
In a statement, Boeing said: “We are in contact with Air India regarding Flight 171 and stand ready to support them.
“Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, first responders and all affected.”
Multiple concerns about Boeing’s Dreamliners, the most modern passenger aircraft in service, have previously been raised by whistleblowers.
In April 2024, a Boeing quality engineer, Sam Salehpour, told members of a Senate subcommittee that Boeing was taking shortcuts to bolster production levels that could lead to jetliners breaking apart.
The engineer said he studied Boeing’s own data and concluded “that the company is taking manufacturing shortcuts on the 787 programme that could significantly reduce the airplane’s safety and the life cycle”.
“They are putting out defective airplanes,” he said.
Boeing denied Mr Salehpour’s claims about the Dreamliner’s structural integrity.
In the same week, a separate Senate commerce committee heard from members of an expert panel that found serious flaws in Boeing’s safety culture.
One of the panel members, MIT aeronautics lecturer Javier de Luis, said workers feel pressure to push planes through the factory as fast as they can.
When talking to Boeing workers, he said he heard “there was a very real fear of payback and retribution if you held your ground”.
Speaking to a Senate subcommittee in June 2024, Boeing chief executive Dave Calhoun said: “Our culture is far from perfect, but we are taking action and making progress. We understand the gravity.”
“We are taking comprehensive action today to strengthen safety and quality.”
In May 2024, federal investigators opened a fresh investigation into the Boeing 787 Dreamliner – after the firm said several employees had committed “misconduct” by falsely claiming tests had been completed.
The Federal Aviation Authority said Boeing was “reinspecting all 787 airplanes still within the production system and must also create a plan to address the in-service fleet” while the investigation is taking place.
Would a British manufacturer have been offered such a deal by US prosecutors?
As for regulation, we’re told oversight has been stepped up and the number of planes that Boeing makes is still subject to controls in a bid to boost quality.
The company has long denied putting profit before safety, but that is what almost every whistleblower to have come forward to date has alleged.
The production limits were implemented after a mid-air door plug blowout aboard an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 9 flight in January last year.
They are hampering Boeing’s efforts to restore profitability.
A 5% fall in its share price at the market open on Wall Street goes to the heart of Boeing’s problem.
That is every time a Boeing plane is involved in an accident or failure, investors’ first instincts are to run for the hills.
Boeing says it is seeking more information on the nature of the Air India crash.
But whether Boeing’s plane is at fault for the loss of Flight 171 or not – and we have seen nothing so far to indicate that was the case – it’s clear the company has a long way to go to restore trust.
In a statement, Boeing president and chief executive Kelly Ortberg, said: “Our deepest condolences go out to the loved ones of the passengers and crew on board Air India Flight 171, as well as everyone affected in Ahmedabad.
“I have spoken with Air India chairman N. Chandrasekaran to offer our full support, and a Boeing team stands ready to support the investigation led by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB).”
Boeing will defer to India’s AAIB to provide information about Air India Flight 171, in adherence with the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization protocol, the company added.
One of the UK’s most valuable listed companies is to sell its shares directly on the rival New York Stock Exchange, in a move described as a “knock back for London”.
While AstraZeneca will maintain its headquarters in the UK and its primary stock listing on the London Stock Exchange, the news can be seen as a move away from London.
“Although there has been no suggestion that AstraZeneca is imminently going to up sticks and move its primary listing from London, there may be some nervousness this morning around the risk that the UK market might lose one of its largest constituents,” said Russ Mould, the investment director of investment platform AJ Bell.
The news “does at least hint at the possibility of a more dramatic shift at some point in the future”, Mr Mould said.
There may also be relief that AstraZeneca is not moving from the London Stock Exchange altogether.
“I think there is probably relief that it’s not pursuing a primary listing in New York, but the decision is hardly a ringing endorsement of London,” said Neil Wilson, the UK investor strategist at investment platform Saxo Markets.
More from Money
“It reflects the fundamental, structural issues in the UK for the largest globally-oriented stocks – the depth and liquidity of its capital markets is falling short of what’s on offer across the pond.”
“It’s also a bit of a knock-back for London”, Mr Wilson said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:56
Why is the UK economy so volatile?
Why is this happening?
The Cambridge-based pharmaceutical company said the decision to sell shares directly on the New York Stock Exchange – rather than the previous less straightforward system of using American depository receipts – has been made to allow it “to reach a broader mix of global investors” and “make it even more attractive for all our shareholders”.
“The US has the world’s largest and most liquid public markets by capitalisation, and the largest pool of innovative biopharma companies and investors,” the company said in an announcement to investors.
AstraZeneca’s share price was up 0.7% on the news.
Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has announced it will partially resume manufacturing “in the coming days” after nearly a month in the wake of a cyber attack.
The luxury car-making plants have paused production since 31 August. The cyber attack halted car-making across the supply chain, with staff off work as a result.
More than 33,000 people work directly for JLR in the UK, many of whom are on assembly lines in the West Midlands, with the largest facility located in Solihull, and a plant in Halewood on Merseyside.
Roughly 200,000 more are employed by several hundred companies in the supply chain, who rely on JLR orders as their biggest client.
“As the controlled, phased restart of our operations continues, we are taking further steps towards our recovery and the return to manufacture of our world-class vehicles,” a company spokesperson said.
The shutdown was said to last until at least 1 October.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:53
Are we in a cyber attack ‘epidemic’?
“Today we are informing colleagues, retailers and suppliers that some sections of our manufacturing operations will resume in the coming days,” the company added, days on from the partial restart of its IT systems, which allowed supplier payments to recommence.
“We know there is much more to do, but the foundational work of our recovery is firmly underway, and we will continue to provide updates as we progress.”
The promise came as the head of the influential Business and Trade Committee of MPs wrote to Chancellor Rachel Reeves, warning small firms reliant on JLR, “may have at best a week of cashflow left to support themselves” with “urgent” action needed to support businesses.
JLR was just the latest business to be the subject of a cyberattack.
Harrods, the Co-Op, and Marks and Spencer, are among the companies that’ve struggled in the past year with such attacks.
The outgoing boss of the British Olympic Association will this week be named as the new chief executive of one of Europe’s biggest e-commerce platforms for sports and outdoor enthusiasts.
Sky News has learnt that Andy Anson, who will step down next month as chief executive of Team GB, is joining Sportscape Group, which boasts a ‘member community’ of over 25 million people.
Sportscape is owned by bd-capital and Bridgepoint, which merged their respective portfolio companies SportPursuit and PrivateSportShop in 2022.
Prior to leading the BOA, Mr Anson was chief executive of Kitbag, which was subsequently sold to Fanatics.
He is also a former commercial director of Manchester United Football Club.
Sportscape trades across core markets including the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain.
“Sportscape has already established itself as a key player in the European sports e-commerce landscape, and I look forward to working with the team to unlock its next phase of growth,” Mr Anson said in a statement issued to Sky News.
More from Money
Andy Dawson, bd-capital’s co-founder and managing partner, said Mr Anson’s experience in global sports commerce made him the right choice to head Sportscape.
Since his departure as the BOA boss was announced during the summer, Mr Anson had agreed to work with another bd-capital-backed company, Science In Sport, by joining its board.
His successor as Team GB chief has yet to be announced.