There was a time when having your own plane was a pretty clear indicator that you were part of that upper crust of society. If it was a pricey and rare electric plane, then all the more. But those days are numbered as the influx of compact and powerful electric powertrain components collides with good old American entrepreneurism to create a number of interesting new electric flying machines that now make it cheaper to fly yourself than drive.
To manage expectations, let’s start by saying we’re talking here about a category of aviation known as “ultralights.” These are tiny, single-occupant aircraft that don’t require airworthiness certificates or pilot’s licenses to operate.
There are still a few rules, namely a total weight under 254 lb (115 kg) and a maximum speed of 55 knots (63 mph or 102 km/h). They also can only be operated in daylight or twilight, and are prohibited from flying over any “congested area of a city.” But other than those and a few other smaller rules, they’re largely a wild-west of minimally-regulated flying machines that allow just about anyone with a credit card and working appendages to achieve their dream of powered flight.
For a long time, the motor of choice for ultralights was either a two-stroke or four-stroke gasoline engine. They were readily available and had the power-to-weight ratio necessary to make an ultralight aircraft work (and fit under the 254-lb limit). But as electric motors have become more power dense and lithium-ion batteries have become more energy dense, electric powertrains are becoming increasingly popular for ultralights.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Electric drivetrains offer ultralight pilots whisper-quiet operation, instant torque, and minimal maintenance. They’re ideal for short, recreational flights where simplicity and low operating costs matter more than range. I.e., they’re perfect for ultralights.
And now that the components used in such drivetrains are more affordable than ever, it’s suddenly becoming cheaper to buy a fully-electric aircraft than buy a used combustion engine car.
Don’t believe it? Check these bad boys out.
In-flight image credit: Screenshot from WhitleyVideos YouTube review (embedded below)
First up is an honest-to-goodness electric airplane. With a wingspan of nearly 27 feet (8.2 meters), the Aerolite EV-103 is described as “perhaps the first viable all-electric fixed wing ultralight aircraft.”
It’s built using the tried-and-true Aerolite airframe that has served as the foundation for countless gasoline engine-powered ultralight aircraft over the years. But the EV-103 makes a few small modifications to the airframe to allow the mounting of a 22 kW peak-rated electric motor in place of the gasoline engine.
Balls to the wall, a top speed of 55 knots (63 mph or 102 km/h) is claimed by the spec sheet, which just so happens to perfectly align with the maximum allowable top speed for ultralight aircraft. However, pilots who have operated the EV-103 have reported that the true top speed is even higher, though it tends to eat through battery life quickly when operated at its highest speeds.
If you thought range anxiety was a thing for electric vehicles on the road, wait until you’re up at 1,000 feet. Fortunately though, you’ve got options.
The electric drivetrain on the Aerolite EV-103 comes with different battery setups that affect the flight time. A minimum of two batteries are required to power the plane, offering 5.2 kWh of capacity and a somewhat underwhelming flight time of 20 minutes. Three or four batteries can be mounted though, upping the flight time to 30 or 40 minutes, respectively, when cruising at around 30-35 knots (40-45 mph or 65-72 km/h). Each of the 2.6 kWh batteries weighs 36 lb (16 kg) and can be removed for charging individually with a simple 120V wall charger, or can be charged all together at once when left on the plane.
The complete Aerolite 103 Quick Build Airframe Kit is available (with some assembly required) for US $17,950. Owners choose their own propulsion system, and the company’s Electric Propulsion System starts at $10,376 for the two-battery package. The three-battery and four-battery setups are priced at $13,739 and $17,102.
For those that don’t want to assemble the airframe, there are ready-to-fly versions available too. The electric EV-103 is priced at between $32,326 to $39,052, depending on the number of batteries.
It’s not exactly lunch money, but it also beats a $300,000 Pipistrel Velis Electro or a $100,000 Jetson ONE eVTOL.
If $30k is still a bit rich for your blood, you’re in luck. If you don’t require fixed wings to feel like a true aircraft, then electric paramotors might be for you.
For just US $6,759, an SP140 electric paramotor can have you flying far above the treetops with a similarly-sized 21 kW electric motor. While it can’t match the speed of fixed-wing electric ultralight aircraft (paramotors are limited by their paraglider wing, which typically can only reach speeds of around 30 knots (35 mph or 56 km/h), the SP140 electric paramotor offers much longer flight times.
The brainchild of Paul Vavra, the SP140 Electric was designed to be an affordable, open-source electric paramotor that would give operators long flight times combined with all the other advantages of electric operation. Paul has refined the design over many years, making it safer and more effective with each new version.
The base 2.6 kWh battery can provide between 20-40 minutes of flight time, while the larger 4.8 kWh battery option can hang around for up to 80 minutes of flight. Even more batteries can be added as well, though by the time you get to 2 hours of flight, the extra weight makes the system less comfortable for foot launching and thus a trike setup becomes more comfortable.
Beyond flight time per battery charge, electric paramotors offer several advantages over electric fixed-wing ultralight aircraft, especially in terms of simplicity, portability, and accessibility. They require far less infrastructure (no runway or hangar needed) and can be transported in the trunk of a car and launched from an open field. Their low cost, ease of use, and slow flying speeds make them ideal for casual pilots, aerial photography, and exploration. And with fewer mechanical systems, paramotors are also generally easier to maintain.
Plus, when compared to gasoline-powered paramotors, electric power obviously offers huge advantages of quieter operation (and silence when the throttle is released), reduced vibrations, and much cheaper operation costs. Gasoline-powered paramotors often cost between US $7.50 to $12.00 per hour of flight, whereas the SP140 costs just $0.60 per hour.
The entire system weighs between 54-79 lb (25-35 kg) depending on the battery option, and packs down to fit in the trunk of a car. In less than five minutes, it can be out of a trunk and fully-assembled (tool-free!), ready to fly. At less than the weight of many electric bicycles (and easier to transport in a trunk, too), I’d argue that the SP140 electric paramotor qualifies as a micromobility vehicle.
Electrek’s Take
Electric aircraft are becoming increasingly common, and it’s no longer rare to see new models capturing headlines. But while fancy multirotor designs that look like scaled up toy drones get most of the press, perhaps these less sexy but significantly more affordable (and actually commercially available) models might be a better real-world solution.
Let’s put the safety issue aside for a moment. I’m going to assume we all recognize that assembling and then taking to the skies in your own largely unregulated flying machine is fraught with risk. But that it’s also your right as an American to dadgum go out there and do it. So let’s just talk about the efficacy first.
Merely looking at the practicality of these things, I can see the argument for them. And it’s not just for recreation, which is of course the primary purpose of ultralights. There are plenty of cases where flying somewhere would just be a more convenient way to get there. Consider rural areas where taking the local state roads or highways could require traveling dozens of miles by car, even if the same distance could be covered in just a few miles as the crow flies. Or as the dude with $7,000 and a healthy appreciation for physics flies.
These could basically be the perfect rural shortcut. You could literally run to the store by ultralight, and it may be quicker and cheaper.
Farm or ranch surveillance would also be a great option. “Out riding fences” isn’t just a line, it’s a real thing that landowners have to do as they inspect miles of fencing for damage, among plenty of other tasks that require monitoring on sprawling personal acreage. Being able to do many of those tasks more quickly from the air could be a major force multiplier.
And while this likely won’t affect the majority of us, anyone who lives in an island chain or even along a coastline might find that an ultralight aircraft is a great way to move between islands or reach destinations along the coast in a faster and more convenient way – not to mention much more scenic.
So sure, personal air travel is still a bit of a niche form of transportation for the average person, but it’s not without its advantages.
And now, as I promised, let’s discuss safety. Yes, these can be dangerous. Just like I know that when I get on my motorcycles, I’m assuming a higher risk than when I get in a car, I imagine the same thought process is necessary for an ultralight aircraft. I’m not telling anyone to go out and become your own pilot. But I AM saying that it’s pretty darn cool that now you can be, that it can be affordable, and that you can finally do it all-electric.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Credit where credit is due: in a massive, 32-car multinational independent test, Tesla’s Autopilot ADAS came out on top, the new affordable Tesla turns out to be a corner-cutting Model Y, and one of the company’s original founders compares the Cybertruck to a dumpster. All this and more on today’s episode of Quick Charge!
Today’s episode is brought to you by Retrospec – the makers of sleek, powerful e-bikes and outdoor gear built for everyday adventure! To that end, we’ve got a pair of Retrospec e-bike reviews followed up by a super cute, super affordable new EV from China with nearly 150 miles of range for less than $5,000 USD.
PLUS: listeners can get an extra 10% off by using code ELECTREK10 at retrospec.com!
New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (most weeks, anyway). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.
Got news? Let us know! Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Tesla is again teasing the new Roadster, which is now five years late, as “the last driver’s car” before self-driving takes over.
The chicken or the egg. Is Tesla delaying the Roadster to match the development of self-driving technology, or is it delaying the development of self-driving technology to match the delayed release of the Roadster?
The prototype for the next-generation Tesla Roadster was first unveiled in 2017, and it was initially scheduled to enter production in 2020; however, it has been delayed every year since then.
It was supposed to achieve a range of 620 miles (1,000 km) and accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 1.9 seconds.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
It has become a sort of running joke, and there are doubts that it will ever come to market despite Tesla’s promise of dozens of free new Roadsters to Tesla owners who participated in its referral program years ago.
Tesla used the promise of free Roadsters to help generate billions of dollars worth of sales, which Tesla owners delivered; however, the automaker never delivered on its part of the agreement.
Furthermore, many people placed deposits ranging from $50,000 to $250,000 to reserve the vehicle, which was initially scheduled to hit the market five years ago.
When unveiling the vehicle, CEO Elon Musk described it as a “halo car” that would deliver a “smack down” to gasoline vehicles.
That was almost eight years ago, and many electric hypercars have since launched and delivered this smackdown.
Tesla has partly blamed the delays on improving the next-gen Roadsters and added features like the “SpaceX package,” which is supposed to include cold air thrusters to enable the vehicle to fly – Musk has hinted.
Many people don’t believe any of it, as Tesla has said that it would launch the new Roadster every year for the last 5 years and never did.
Now, Lars Moravy, Tesla’s head of vehicle engineering, made a rare new comment about the next-generation Roadster during an interview at the X Takeover event, an annual gathering of Elon Musk cultists, last weekend.
He referred to Tesla’s next-gen Roadster as the “last best driver’s car” and said that the automaker did “some cool demos” for Musk last week:
We spent a lot of time in the last few years rethinking what we did, and why we did it, and what would make an awesome and exciting last best driver’s car. We’ve been making it better and better, and it is even a little bit more than a car. We showed Elon some cool demos last week and tech we’ve been working on, and he got a little excited.
We suspected that the comment might be about the Tesla Roadster, as the CEO made the exact same comment about Roadster demos in 2019 and 2024. You will not be shocked to hear that these demos never happen.
Electrek’s Take
The “last best driver’s car” before computers are going to drive us everywhere. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy if you continue to delay the car. It might literally be the last car ever made that way. How would we ever know?
The truth is that the Roadster was cool when it was unveiled in 2017, but that was a long time ago. Tesla would need to update the car quite a bit to make it cool in 2025, and I don’t know that cold air clusters are it. You will have extreme limitations using those.
The Roadster is almost entirely in the “put up or shut up” category for me at Tesla. They need to stop talking about it and make it happen; otherwise, I can’t believe a word.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The PV5 is already available in several markets, but will Kia launch it in the US? After Kia’s electric van was spotted testing in the US again, a US debut could be in the works.
Is Kia’s electric van coming to the US?
Kia launched the PV5, the first dedicated electric van from its new Platform Beyond vehicle (PBV) business, in South Korea and Europe earlier this year, promising it will roll out in “other global markets” in 2026.
Will that include the US? Earlier this year, Kia’s electric van was caught charging at a station in Indiana. Photos and a video sent to Electrek by Alex Nguyen confirmed it was, in fact, the PV5.
Kia has yet to say if it will sell the PV5 in the US, likely due to the Trump Administration’s new auto tariffs. All electric vans, or PBVs, including the PV5, will be built at Kia’s Hwaseong plant in South Korea, which means they will face a stiff 25% tariff as imports.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Following another sighting, a US debut cannot be ruled out. The PV5 Passenger model was spotted by Automotive Validation Engineer Chris Higa (@Chrisediting) while testing in Arizona.
There’s no denying that’s Kia’s electric van, but it doesn’t necessarily confirm it will launch in the US. But it could make sense.
Despite record first-half sales in the US, Kia’s EV sales have fallen significantly. Sales of the EV9 and EV6 are nearly 50% less than in the first half of 2024.
To be fair, part of it is due to the new model year changeover, but Kia is also doubling down on the US market by boosting local production. Earlier this year, Kia said the EV6 and EV9 are now in full-scale production at its West Point, GA, facility.
The PV5 Passenger (shown above) is available in Europe with two battery pack options: 51.5 kWh or 71.2 kWh, rated with WLTP ranges of 179 miles and 249 miles, respectively. The Cargo variant has the same battery options but offers a WLTP range of either 181 miles or 247 miles.
During its PV5 Tech Day event last week, Kia revealed plans for seven PV5 body types, including an Open Bed (similar to a pickup), a Light Camper, and even a luxury “Prime” passenger model.
Kia PV5 tech day (Source: Kia)
Kia is set to begin deliveries of the PV5 Passenger and Cargo Long variants in South Korea next month, followed by Europe and other global markets, starting in Q4 2025. As for a US launch, we will have to wait for the official word from Kia.
Do you want Kia to bring its electric van to the US? Drop us a comment below and let us know your thoughts.