Connect with us

Published

on

Waymo is once again expanding its driverless taxi service areas in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Silicon Valley, adding over 80 square miles total between the three areas.

The move comes less than a week before the tentative, much-anticipated launch of Tesla’s robotaxi service in Austin, another market that Waymo operates in.

Waymo currently operates a driverless taxi service in several areas around the country, with three distinct service areas in California – San Francisco, nearby Silicon Valley, and Los Angeles.

Those service areas have gradually gotten larger over time, as Waymo tests and maps new roads that it’s confident its vehicles can operate on autonomously. Waymo has also gradually rolled out its service to wider and wider audiences, typically starting in new areas with employee-only ridership, then a gradual release to the public.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

LA and SF are fully public now, while the Silicon Valley area only opened a few months ago and is not fully publicly available for ridership. Waymo’s SF and Silicon Valley service areas are disconnected, so despite being nearby, you can’t ride a Waymo from one to the other.

Today and tomorrow, all three of those California service areas are increasing in size substantially, adding about 50% to the total service area in the state, bringing it to a total of around 250 square miles.

As of today, riders in San Francisco now have access to much more of the peninsula, including Brisbane, South San Francisco, San Bruno, Millbrae, and all the way down to Burlingame.

The nearby Silicon Valley area isn’t fully open to the public yet, but that too expanded today, into Menlo Park and covering more of Palo Alto.

LA service is also expanding, though it’s not quite usable yet today – the expansion will take place tomorrow, June 18, for the LA area. This area is gaining new coverage in just about every direction, rather than expanding out in one direction like the SF expansion.

The new LA area covers Playa Del Rey, Ladera Heights, Echo Park, Silverlake, more of Inglewood and all of famous Sunset Boulevard.

The new service area encompasses UCLA for the first time, though it had previously gone up to Westwood, right next to campus. Waymo had previously expanded to encompass Howard Hughes center and the Inglewood stadium and the Forum (I hate calling stadia by their corporate names…) earlier this year, adding great options for those who want to avoid parking or who are thinking of imbibing liquids that are not conducive to operating heavy machinery.

Notably, the new SF and LA service areas both do not include their local international airports. The SF area skirts around SFO, keeping some distance to the west of the 101, and the LA area goes right up to the North edge of LAX but doesn’t quiiiite get there.

It looks like it would be possible to get a drop off spot within an easy walk of LAX, perhaps at the long-term parking lots just nearby, but Waymo’s area also stops just a couple hundred yards short of the “LAX-it” lot specifically set up for ride-hailing app usage.

Currently, Waymo’s Phoenix service area does include service to Sky Harbor airport, but it looks like California riders will have to wait a little longer for something like that. The Silicon Valley service area does now encompass Palo Alto airport, and LA encompasses Santa Monica airport, but those are both tiny airports more for private planes or enthusiasts.

So far, Waymo can’t be used on the freeways in Los Angeles, though it can in San Francisco for some riders. This means that for certain cross-town trips, taking a Waymo is likely quite a bit slower than otherwise.

But the service is currently testing on LA’s freeways, and we expect it to release that service to the public soon.

If you’d like to see a (very long) writeup/video of our ride in a Waymo when it first opened its LA area, see here: We tested Waymo’s driverless taxi in LA in the perfect chaos of a Venice Beach weekend

Comparisons to Tesla before robotaxi launch

It’s somewhat of a different approach than that taken by Tesla, another company that has been promising autonomous driving for many years, but has yet to deliver it.

Tesla’s level 2 Autopilot driver assist system was first available on highways, rather than surface streets. Highways, despite being higher speed, are much safer and less complex than surface streets, since they are well-marked and don’t have cross-traffic or road users with other modes of transportation. So, theoretically, they should be easier to operate on.

It’s interesting that Waymo started with surface streets, which are a more complex problem, and is available in some fairly complex cities to drive in, as well. While its first service area, Phoenix, is a relatively easy city to drive in, San Francisco is very difficult to drive in and Los Angeles has plenty of complexity as well.

Waymo’s system is a “level 4” system according to the SAE’s Levels of driving automation, in contrast with Tesla’s current level 2 system (which both Autopilot and FSD fall under). A level 2 system means the car can do a lot of tasks, but responsibility still falls on the driver at all times. A level 4 system can operate with no driver at all, but only in limited circumstances (in this case, geofencing). Tesla’s Austin rollout this weekend would be level 4 – if it doesn’t rely fully on teleoperation.

The comparison to Tesla is also relevant in that, while Waymo has been operating driverless taxis for years now, Tesla has been talking about it, but hasn’t yet done it. For over a decade, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has promised that a Tesla would be able to drive itself, with nobody in the car, “next year” – continually pushing back the timeline each year.

Now, supposedly, the service will come out in less than a week, as Tesla says it will start offering autonomous rides in Austin on June 22.

This comes after, and I quote, “several days” of testing – again, a contrast to Waymo’s method, which has included months of testing in markets before gradually rolling out to employees, limited public release, and then wide public releases, whenever they add new service areas or modes (such as highway driving).

Yesterday, Electrek released a report about the haphazard nature of Tesla’s driverless service rollout (and another about an erroneous Bloomberg report comparing Waymo and Tesla’s safety). Rest assured we will be watching the launch closely, whether it happens next week, or “next year,” as has been promised for the last decade or so.


But if you own your *own* EV, you should charge your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

This new wireless e-bike charger wants to be the future of electric bikes

Published

on

By

This new wireless e-bike charger wants to be the future of electric bikes

Forget fumbling with cables or hunting for batteries – TILER is making electric bike charging as seamless as parking your ride. The Dutch startup recently introduced its much-anticipated TILER Compact system, a plug-and-play wireless charger engineered to transform the user experience for e-bike riders.

At the heart of the new system is a clever combo: a charging kickstand that mounts directly to almost any e‑bike, and a thin charging mat that you simply park over. Once you drop the kickstand and it lands on the mat, the bike begins charging automatically via inductive transfer – no cable required. According to TILER, a 500 Wh battery will fully charge in about 3.5 hours, delivering comparable performance to traditional wired chargers.

It’s an elegantly simple concept (albeit a bit chunky) with a convenient upside: less clutter, fewer broken cables, and no more need to bend over while feeling around for a dark little hole.

TILER claims its system works with about 75% of existing e‑bike platforms, including those from Bosch, Yamaha, Bafang, and other big bames. The kit uses a modest 150 W wireless power output, which means charging speeds remain practical while keeping the system lightweight (the tile weighs just 2 kg, and it’s also stationary).

Advertisement – scroll for more content

TILER has already deployed over 200 charging points across Western Europe, primarily serving bike-share, delivery, hospitality, and hotel fleets. A recent case study in Munich showed how a cargo-bike operator saved approximately €1,250 per month in labor costs, avoided thousands in spare batteries, and cut battery damage by 20%. The takeaway? Less maintenance, more uptime.

Now shifting to prosumer markets, TILER says the Compact system will hit pre-orders soon, with a €250 price tag (roughly US $290) for the kickstand plus tile bundle. To get in line, a €29 refundable deposit is currently required, though they say it is refundable at any point until you receive your charger. Don’t get too excited just yet though, there’s a bit of a wait. Deliveries are expected in summer 2026, and for now are covering mostly European markets.

The concept isn’t entirely new. We’ve seen the idea pop up before, including in a patent from BMW for charging electric motorcycles. And the efficacy is there. Skeptics may wonder if wireless charging is slower or less efficient, but TILER says no. Its system retains over 85% efficiency, nearly matching wired charging speeds, and even pauses at 80% to protect battery health, then resumes as needed. The tile is even IP67-rated, safe for outdoor use, and about as bulky as a thick magazine.

Electrek’s Take

I love the concept. It makes perfect sense for shared e-bikes, especially since they’re often returning to a dock anyway. As long as people can be trained to park with the kickstand on the tile, it seems like a no-brainer.

And to be honest, I even like the idea for consumers. I know it sounds like a first-world problem, but bending over to plug something in at floor height is pretty annoying, not to mention a great way to throw out your back if you’re not exactly a spring chicken anymore. Having your e-bike start charging simply by parking it in the right place is a really cool feature! I don’t know if it’s $300 cool, but it’s pretty cool!

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla launches new software update with Grok, but it doesnt even interface with the car

Published

on

By

Tesla launches new software update with Grok, but it doesnt even interface with the car

Tesla has launched a new software update for its vehicles that includes the anticipated integration of Grok, but it doesnt even interface with the car yet.

Earlier this week, CEO Elon Musk said that Tesla would integrate Grok, the large language model developed by his private company, xAI, into its vehicles.

Today, Tesla started pushing the update to the fleet, but there’s a significant caveat.

The automaker wrote in the release notes (2025.26):

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Grok (Beta) (US, AMD)

Grok now available directly in your Tesla

Requires Premium Connectivity or a WiFi connection

Grok is currently in Beta & does not issue commands to your car – existing voice commands remain unchanged.

First off, it is only available in vehicles in the US equipped with the AMD infotainment computer, which means cars produced since mid-2021.

But more importantly, Tesla says that it doesn’t send commands to the car under the current version. Therefore, it is simply like having Grok on your phone, but on the onboard computer instead.

Tesla showed an example:

There are a few other features in the 2025.26 software update, but they are not major.

For Tesla vehicles equipped with ambient lighting strips inside the car, the light strip can now sync to music:

Accent lights now respond to music & you can also choose to match the lights to the album’s color for a more immersive effect

Toybox > Light Sync

Here’s the new setting:

The audio setting can now be saved under multiple presets to match listening preferences for different people or circumstances:

The software update also includes the capacity to zoom or adjust the playback speed of the Dashcam Viewer.

Cybertruck also gets the updated Dashcam Viewer app with a grid view for easier access and review of recordings:

Tesla also updated the charging info in its navigation system to be able to search which locations require valet service or pay-to-park access.

Upon arrival, drivers will receive a notification with access codes, parking restrictions, level or floor information, and restroom availability:

Finally, there’s a new onboarding guide directly on the center display to help people who are experiencing a Tesla vehicle for the first time.

Electrek’s Take

Tesla is really playing catch-up here. Right now, this update is essentially nothing. If you already have Grok, it’s no more different than having it on your phone or through the vehicle’s browser, since it has no capacity to interact with any function inside the vehicle.

Most other automakers are integrating LLMs inside vehicles with the capacity to interact with the vehicle. In China, this is becoming standard even in entry-level cars.

In the Xiaomi YU7, the vehicle’s AI can not only interact with the car, but it also sees what the car sees through its camera, and it can tell you about what it sees:

Tesla is clearly far behind on that front as many automakers are integrating with other LLMs like ChatGPT and in-house LLMs, like Xiaomi’s.

Continue Reading

Environment

Robinhood is up 160% this year, but several obstacles are ahead

Published

on

By

Robinhood is up 160% this year, but several obstacles are ahead

Florida AG opens probe into Robinhood. Here's the latest

Robinhood stock hit an all-time high Friday as the financial services platform continued to rip higher this year, along with bitcoin and other crypto stocks.

Robinhood, up more than 160% in 2025, hit an intraday high above $101 before pulling back and closing slightly lower.

The reversal came after a Bloomberg report that JPMorgan plans to start charging fintechs for access to customer bank data, a move that could raise costs across the industry.

For fintech firms that rely on thin margins to offer free or low-cost services to customers, even slight disruptions to their cost structure can have major ripple effects. PayPal and Affirm both ended the day nearly 6% lower following the report.

Despite its stellar year, the online broker is facing several headwinds, with a regulatory probe in Florida, pushback over new staking fees and growing friction with one of the world’s most high-profile artificial intelligence companies.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier opened a formal investigation into Robinhood Crypto on Thursday, alleging the platform misled users by claiming to offer the lowest-cost crypto trading.

“Robinhood has long claimed to be the best bargain, but we believe those representations were deceptive,” Uthmeier said in a statement.

The probe centers on Robinhood’s use of payment for order flow — a common practice where market makers pay to execute trades — which the AG said can result in worse pricing for customers.

Robinhood Crypto General Counsel Lucas Moskowitz told CNBC its disclosures are “best-in-class” and that it delivers the lowest average cost.

“We disclose pricing information to customers during the lifecycle of a trade that clearly outlines the spread or the fees associated with the transaction, and the revenue Robinhood receives,” added Moskowitz.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev explains 'dual purpose' behind trading platform's new crypto offerings

Robinhood is also facing opposition to a new 25% cut of staking rewards for U.S. users, set to begin October 1. In Europe, the platform will take a smaller 15% cut.

Staking allows crypto holders to earn yield by locking up their tokens to help secure blockchain networks like ethereum, but platforms often take a percentage of those rewards as commission.

Robinhood’s 25% cut puts it in line with Coinbase, which charges between 25.25% and 35% depending on the token. The cut is notably higher than Gemini’s flat 15% fee.

It marks a shift for the company, which had previously steered clear of staking amid regulatory uncertainty.

Under President Joe Biden‘s administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission cracked down on U.S. platforms offering staking services, arguing they constituted unregistered securities.

With President Donald Trump in the White House, the agency has reversed course on several crypto enforcement actions, dropping cases against major players like Coinbase and Binance and signaling a more permissive stance.

Even as enforcement actions ease, Robinhood is under fresh scrutiny for its tokenized stock push, which is a growing part of its international strategy.

The company now offers blockchain-based assets in Europe that give users synthetic exposure to private firms like OpenAI and SpaceX through special purpose vehicles, or SPVs.

An SPV is a separate entity that acquires shares in a company. Users then buy tokens of the SPV and don’t have shareholder privileges or voting rights directly in the company.

OpenAI has publicly objected, warning the tokens do not represent real equity and were issued without its approval. In an interview with CNBC International, CEO Vlad Tenev acknowledged the tokens aren’t technically equity shares, but said that misses the broader point.

JPMorgan announces plans to charge for access to customer bank data

“What’s important is that retail customers have an opportunity to get exposure to this asset,” he said, pointing to the disruptive nature of AI and the historically limited access to pre-IPO companies.

“It is true that these are not technically equity,” Tenev added, noting that institutional investors often gain similar exposure through structured financial instruments.

The Bank of Lithuania — Robinhood’s lead regulator in the EU — told CNBC on Monday that it is “awaiting clarifications” following OpenAI’s statement.

“Only after receiving and evaluating this information will we be able to assess the legality and compliance of these specific instruments,” a spokesperson said, adding that information for investors must be “clear, fair, and non-misleading.”

Tenev responded that Robinhood is “happy to continue to answer questions from our regulators,” and said the company built its tokenized stock program to withstand scrutiny.

“Since this is a new thing, regulators are going to want to look at it,” he said. “And we expect to be scrutinized as a large, innovative player in this space.”

SEC Chair Paul Atkins recently called the model “an innovation” on CNBC’s Squawk Box, offering some validation as Robinhood leans further into its synthetic equity strategy — even as legal clarity remains in flux across jurisdictions.

Despite the regulatory noise, many investors remain focused on Robinhood’s upside, and particularly the political tailwinds.

The company is positioning itself as a key beneficiary of Trump’s newly signed megabill, which includes $1,000 government-seeded investment accounts for newborns. Robinhood said it’s already prototyping an app for the ‘Trump Accounts‘ initiative.

WATCH: Watch CNBC’s full interview with Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev

Watch CNBC's full interview with Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev

Continue Reading

Trending