Connect with us

Published

on

The Pentagon briefing was big on what happened but short on detail of what happens next.

Neither defence secretary Pete Hegseth nor General Dan “Raisin” Caine, chair of the joint chiefs of staff, can answer that.

Mr Hegseth called the bombing an “incredible and overwhelming success” with “focused and clear” instructions from President Trump.

The focus now is on what follows and that’s not so clear.

The briefing laid out the details of the military deception plan behind Operation Midnight Hammer.

B-2 stealth aircraft were flown west towards the Pacific on Saturday as a decoy, while the B-2s with bunker-busting bombs on board flew east towards Iran.

Israel-Iran live: World continues to react to US attack on nuclear facilities

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is Operation ‘Midnight Hammer’?

Mr Hegseth called it a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and came down, in the end, to “precision, misdirection and operational security”.

Gen Caine, Mr Trump’s top military man, offered a measured assessment. While Mr Trump had spoken of Iran’s nuclear sites being “obliterated”, Gen Caine revised that downwards when he spoke of “extremely severe damage”.

Full battle damage assessment will reveal the complete picture – only then can the mission’s success be measured in full, mindful that Iran had shifted at least some of its enriched uranium in the days before the strike.

On the politics of it, Mr Hegseth said this wasn’t about regime change in Iran. It might offer precious little reassurance to Tehran, particularly as he also said part of the operation was to defend Israel and the ongoing defence of Israel.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What next after US-Iran strikes?

If the US is tethered to Israel’s interests to the extent of an unprecedented attack on Iran, where does its influence end?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared almost giddy in response to the US attack. He is a PM strengthened by Mr Trump’s spectacular response to his rhetoric around Iran.

Suspicions weren’t softened around Netanyahu’s influence over Mr Trump when Mr Hegseth was asked about the basis for the attack. He has long lobbied the US president on Iran being close to building a nuclear bomb, contrary to American intelligence which indicates otherwise.

Mr Hegseth was asked what was the new intelligence, was it American or from other countries? He avoided a direct answer, saying only that Mr Trump had looked at all the intelligence information and concluded Iran was a threat.

There were a number of questions about what comes next, with an assortment of non-answers in response from Mr Hegseth.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer reacts to US strikes on Iran

Read more:
Iran may not have lost its ability to make a nuclear bomb
Iran may decide that killing Americans is the best way to retaliate

A consistent line was that the US wanted Iran to negotiate peace, coupled with the threat of further aggression if it doesn’t.

The US defence secretary said Washington was in touch with Tehran privately and publicly, giving it every opportunity to come to the table, every opportunity for peace.

He made the point that America hadn’t targeted Iranian troops or civilians – clearly, a measure by the US to limit response and leave open a door.

The Americans want this attack to have been a “one-and-done”.

The scenario it’s left with, however, is an Iran talking of a diplomatic door closed and sending its foreign minister travelling to Moscow to meet Vladimir Putin.

Iran is wounded, no doubt. Combined attacks have left it degraded and, without a network of support in the Middle East, its ability to strike back is limited. For now, if not necessarily forever.

Donald Trump clearly enjoyed the sugar rush of military success but he will be wary of the come-down and all of its uncertainties.

In circumstances with world implications, he won’t be alone.

Continue Reading

US

Donald Trump orders deployment of US troops to ‘war-ravaged’ Portland

Published

on

By

Donald Trump orders deployment of US troops to 'war-ravaged' Portland

Donald Trump has ordered the deployment of US troops to “war-ravaged Portland” in the state of Oregon, authorising the use of “full force” if needed.

The US president said he was directing US defence secretary Pete Hegseth to make the move in order to protect the city “and any of our ICE facilities under siege from attack by Antifa and other domestic terrorists”.

Mr Trump did not specify whether he would send in National Guard troops or the US military.

The move comes after a gunman opened fire on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office in Dallas on Wednesday, wounding two detainees and killing another.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Fatal shooting at ICE facility in Dallas

The ICE facility in Portland has been targeted by protesters since June, sometimes leading to violent clashes.

On Friday, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said demonstrators had “repeatedly attacked and laid siege to an ICE processing centre” there, adding that several arrests were made.

More on Donald Trump

“Rose City Antifa, a recently designated domestic terrorist organization, illegally doxed ICE officers. They published their home address online and on public flyers. Individuals associated with Antifa also sent death threats to DHS personnel,” DHS wrote on X.

Speaking in the Oval Office on Thursday, Mr Trump said “anarchy” was taking place in Portland.

He said: “You go out to Portland, people die out there. Many people have died over the years in Portland. Portland is, I don’t know how anybody lives there. It’s amazing, but it’s, it’s anarchy out there. That’s what they want. They want anarchy.”

In separate comments, Mr Trump said people were “out of control” in Portland and pledged to “stop that very soon”.

People protest against the Trump's immigration policies in Portland. Pic: Reuters
Image:
People protest against the Trump’s immigration policies in Portland. Pic: Reuters

ICE agents charge towards protesters in Portland. Pic: Reuters
Image:
ICE agents charge towards protesters in Portland. Pic: Reuters

After Mr Trump’s announcement, Oregon’s Democratic governor Tina Kotek said she was reaching out to the White House for more information.

“We have been provided no information on the reason or purpose of any military mission. There is no national security threat in Portland. Our communities are safe and calm,” she said.

Read more: Trump threatens to move World Cup games from ‘unsafe’ host cities

Portland’s mayor Keith Wilson said in a statement that the “number of necessary troops is zero, in Portland and any other American city”.

But Republicans supported the move. US labour secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, who previously served as a Republican house representative for an Oregon district, said she had seen how “lawlessness” had turned Portland into a “crime-ridden war zone”.

In a post on X, she thanked Mr Trump “for taking action to keep our ICE facilities protected and Make America Great Again”.

Trump has sent military troops to the Democratic-controlled cities of Los Angeles and Washington DC so far in his second presidency. He has also discussed doing the same in Memphis and New Orleans, which are also Democratic strongholds.

Continue Reading

US

Charlie Kirk’s movement is growing in the wake of his assassination – as is the chasm in US politics

Published

on

By

Charlie Kirk's movement is growing in the wake of his assassination - as is the chasm in US politics

It was an event organisers had hoped, perhaps optimistically, would be civil. Then comes a shout: “Shut the f**k up!”

In a busy room at Colorado State University, where Charlie Kirk had been scheduled to speak before his assassination, the crowd is riled, loudly heckling the speaker, Steven Bonnell, a left-wing streamer better known as Destiny.

It’s rowdy, gladiatorial and, in some ways, childish. A man in a Donald Trump shirt and a MAGA hat addresses Mr Bonnell: “You’re a fascist! You’re a degenerate!”

“I don’t want to get killed,” the streamer tells me after the debate.

“I’m out here at these events. And I wish that everybody could take a step back and realise that not every single issue that we fight over is the end of the f*****g world.”

This is where Kirk had been due to speak on the next stop on the tour that ended with his assassination in Utah.

A 21-year-old student has said she now carries a handgun because she’s a conservative. A young man says he came here from Florida because he didn’t feel safe.

More on Charlie Kirk

Another man, clearly quite drunk, points out a transgender person in the crowd and says they shouldn’t be allowed firearms. He receives a loud chorus of boos and cheers.

Across the road, in the football stadium, there had been a vigil. Amid a heavy police presence, more than 7,000 gathered to pay their respects, most of them wearing MAGA hats.

It was as much a rally or a recruitment drive for Kirk’s organisation, Turning Point USA, with speakers promising to set up thousands of new chapters around Colorado. I’ve come here to understand the movement he created, how he built it – and what it looks like without him.

“His political ideology is abhorrent, but I think he’s a very effective organiser,” Bonnell says. “And yeah, I’ll give credit where credit is due. He built a very impressive movement in an area that was considered unwinnable by conservatives.”

Steven Bonnell, a left wing streamer better known as Destiny
Image:
Steven Bonnell, a left wing streamer better known as Destiny

‘The world of Charlie Kirk’

Kirk grew up in Arlington Heights, a suburb of Chicago, Illinois. Here, another smaller-scale vigil has been set up, organised by Sofia Volpe. She is 18 years old and came across Kirk on social media.

She says: “My family is conservative. I hold those values myself, but it was really nice to hear somebody younger speaking on this.

“I went to Wheeling High School, where Charlie went, and I joined the Turning Point chapter there. So that also kind of brought me into the world of Charlie Kirk.”

I ask her if she gets any backlash for supporting Kirk.

“People say that I’m horrible, that I’m racist, that I’m homophobic, that I’m transphobic, just all the phobics and I don’t identify myself with any of that. I think that I am a very loving and open person to anybody because people are people.”

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈

At another vigil, in another Chicago suburb, Miguel Melgar acknowledges not everyone saw Kirk that way.

“I don’t personally think that Charlie had hatred in his heart. However, that doesn’t mean that I don’t accept the fact that he did make what could be perceived as some insensitive statements,” he says.

“And I think that especially if you do take certain statements and really only look at them in a vacuum, it could very well be perceived as statements that might have proliferated some type of a culture of a lack of acceptance.”

‘Kirk has become a martyr’

Kirk used social media to spread his message, to win over young minds, but he also built a formidable political organisation, Turning Point USA (TPUSA), to advocate for conservative politics on high school, college, and university campuses: boots on the ground to mobilise the likes online.

Mr Melgar helped him create it. He says TPUSA started as a moderate, bipartisan organisation and only became explicitly conservative after a $100,000 donation from a Republican politician.

“I think that there are plenty of opportunists that will want to see this as a Franz Ferdinand assassination type of event in the culture war… who will want to take any and every opportunity to use this to continue to drive division and to see this as an opportunity to create World War III,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s James Matthews and Tom Cheshire reflect on a frenetic 10 days since Kirk’s assassination

The vigil we meet at is outside TPUSA’s first office, and others have also come to pay their respects. For many, it was Kirk’s faith – and his evangelism – that was most important.

And that’s how to understand his critics, an attendee named Marlene says, when I ask if she sees where they are coming from.

“I certainly do, it’s from the dark side…they don’t understand it and they’re threatened. Satan is always threatened.”

I ask about Kirk’s well-documented views on gay marriage (he opposed it) and Islam (which he wrote was “not compatible with Western civilisation”).

“There is right and wrong,” she says. “And sometimes it’s hard for people to hear that.”

A vigil held for Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated earlier this month
Image:
A vigil held for Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated earlier this month

As I leave, Mr Melgar joins hands in prayer with Marlene and her friend Anna.

Mr Melgar told me he would be going to another vigil later, so we tag along. It’s organised by Matthew Monfore, a young volunteer with Turning Point USA. And for him, Kirk’s fusion of religion and politics is what made him such an inspiration.

“Charlie Kirk has become really a martyr not just for Americans but I think for these nationalist movements across the world,” he said.

“And so when you do take a Christian foundation of Western civilisation, and that’s shipped around the world, and Islam, which is basically antithetical to that in numerous ways, and then also besides Islam, the gay marriage aspect of it, we believe that, according to Christian values, marriage is between one man, one woman, and that’s natural and right and given to us by God.”

The vigil in Colorado
Image:
The vigil in Colorado

This is an explicit Christian nationalism, a term Mr Monfore is happy with – a faith that seeks not merely to inform politics, but to refashion it with Christianity at its centre, with other faiths and non-traditional beliefs relegated.

He is particularly incensed by the online reaction to Kirk’s murder, some of which certainly celebrated his death. I point out that Kirk himself called for President Joe Biden to be put on trial “and/or executed”.

He continued: “That is a good observation. And so I would actually defend that as free speech, because we do believe that Biden is a traitor to our country. And I know that people on the left think that Trump’s Hitler. So I really think that both you and I are in a conundrum here, that both people view each other as evil.”

Does Mr Monfore think the other side is evil?

He replies: “The left embraces ideology that’s antithetical to morality… So I think that the left embraces evil.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Donald Trump hailed Charlie Kirk a ‘hero’

‘I’m not going to send thoughts and prayers’

If the left has a spiritual home, it may be the University of California, Berkley. Two young Republicans, Martin Bertao and Miguel Muniz, are ploughing a relatively lonely furrow, pitching a tent with a sign that says “Change My Mind” – a tactic popularised by Kirk.

On their desk is a cap emblazoned with the logo of ICE, the US immigration authority that has been carrying out a crackdown, and another with Trump 2028, a reference to a third presidential term currently forbidden by the US Constitution.

Mr Bertao says it’s “rage bait” but also admits: “If they somehow repealed the Constitution and he won the primary, sure I’ll vote for him.

“We just try to spread the good word of conservatism, spread the amazing job that Donald Trump’s doing for our country.”

How does that tend to go down, I ask.

“Yeah, so, I don’t want to say unsafe, but sometimes people spit at us, sometimes people will yell at us,” Mr Muniz says.

Martin Bertao and Miguel Muniz at the University of California, Berkley
Image:
Martin Bertao and Miguel Muniz at the University of California, Berkley

A student called James passes by. He tells me: “I’m not excited about (Kirk’s death), but you know I’m not going to mourn someone who was actively rooting for my death as a trans person.

“So it’s not like I’m going to feel bad about it or send thoughts and prayers because if it were me, he’d be so happy.”

Kirk said in 2023 that “the transgender thing happening in America” is a “throbbing middle finger to God” and called trans athlete Lea Thomas “an abomination to God”.

“Speakers like him had, and like how, you know, his talks about transgender ideology, that changed a lot of how people treated me at my own high school,” James says.

Kirk also started a database called Professor Watchlist, dedicated to “unmasking” radical professors.

Read more from Sky News:
Musk and Prince Andrew named in Epstein files release
Diplomats walk out as Israeli PM Netanyahu speaks at UN

Republican Miguel Muniz claims he has been spat on since the death of Charlie Kirk
Image:
Republican Miguel Muniz claims he has been spat on since the death of Charlie Kirk

Grace Lavery, an associate professor of English at Berkeley, was put on that list. She says she has changed her public office hours as a result.

“The part that feels more dangerous to me is that the conspicuousness and the sharing of that kind of information is then drawn on by people who are far more dangerous,” she says.

“There’s a significant population of far-right militants in the broader northern Californian scene. And those people are dangerous.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Charlie Kirk’s widow Erika vows to continue his mission

But although she describes Kirk as “an absolutely loathsome figure”, she doesn’t condemn him alone.

“We find ourselves in this polarity whereby we are so disgusted at the conduct of the people we understand as our enemy that we point out every time they do something vulgar,” she says.

“And then the moment that it falls to us to do something equally vulgar and disgusting, we do so anyway, and then blame the other side because they started it.

“And it is that form of split thinking which makes hypocrites of all of us, including me.”

‘I hope there’s a chance we can meet in the middle’

In Glendale, Arizona, people have spent the night camping outside the State Farm Stadium, “a bit of a party” according to one of them, to make sure they get a seat for the official memorial for Charlie Kirk.

The 63,000 stadium is quickly filled, and the overflow is directed towards another 20,000 seater not far away. Christian rock blares loudly, and when the speakers take to the stage, the entire crowd holds up the Turning Point USA signs placed on their seats.

Kirk’s movement isn’t going anywhere. In fact, it’s growing.

Thousands gather to remember right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk
Image:
Thousands gather to remember right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk

Callie, 18, Shaye, 27, and Britney, 32 and carrying her one-year-old son, drove 10 hours from California to be here.

“But it was worth it, and I’m so glad to be here,” Callie says. “It’s just powerful to be in the midst of all these people and be gathered together.”

“I wouldn’t have realised how much of an impact that Charlie Kirk’s organisation has had on the country and on the world until he was gone,” Shaye says.

What she says next brings her to tears: “And it’s so sad that that had to happen. But I know that God really does give beauty for ashes. I’m so grateful to Jesus Christ because I know Charlie Kirk’s gone on Earth, but he lives in heaven with Jesus Christ. And I’m so happy to be here to honour his legacy and his life.”

I ask whether they feel the US can come together with this memorial – or whether it will remain ever more divided.

“We have to be hopeful that there’s a chance that we can come in the middle. I think we felt hurt by how they treated the situation because we all lost somebody,” Britney says.

“We’re definitely praying that we can get together and meet.”

Matthew Monfore, a young volunteer with Turning Point USA
Image:
Matthew Monfore, a young volunteer with Turning Point USA

‘Fight, fight fight!’

If Kirk built his power on the smartphone screen, this memorial is the jumbotron version of his politics: a mix of entertainment, religion and politics on a bombastic scale.

And on display are two interpretations, two visions, of his Christian nationalism, vengeance and forgiveness, Old Testament and New.

Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff and one of the speakers, labels the left “wicked”.

“You are nothing. You produce nothing,” he says.

The President of the United States says: “I hate my enemies and I do not wish them well.”

But Erika Kirk, Charlie’s widow, is responsible for the most arresting moment of the memorial. Citing Jesus’s example on the cross, she addresses her husband’s murderer: “I forgive you.”

Afterwards, I catch up with Matthew Monfore, the Christian nationalist I met at the vigil in Illinois. He’d driven 26 hours to make it to Arizona, and he preferred the less tolerant message.

“We view the left as very irrational. The term was used by Stephen Miller and people on the cabinet. The term wicked came about that to deny these basic truths and being taught that you should be ashamed for standing otherwise came out today.

“The President of the United States spoke. He, along with people in his cabinet, essentially spoke to using the ‘fight’ word.

“Fight, fight, fight!”

Continue Reading

US

Gunman who targeted skyscraper housing NFL HQ ‘had brain disease that’s linked to playing American football’

Published

on

By

Gunman who targeted skyscraper housing NFL HQ 'had brain disease that's linked to playing American football'

A gunman who murdered four people in a New York office building before taking his own life had CTE, a degenerative brain disease which has been linked to playing American football.

It is believed Shane Tamura targeted the skyscraper in Manhattan because it houses the headquarters of the NFL.

The 27-year-old, who played high school football, had “unambiguous diagnostic evidence” of low-stage CTE, or chronic traumatic encephalopathy, the New York City medical examiner said.

In a three-page note discovered by police after the mass shooting, Tamura made repeated references to CTE.

Shane Tamura. Pic: AP
Image:
Shane Tamura. Pic: AP

In his note, which was written on notepad paper and using a variety of ink, Tamura wrote “CTE study my brain please. I’m sorry.” And again: “Please study brain for CTE. I’m sorry.”

He also specifically refers to Terry Long, a former NFL player who starred for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Long was diagnosed with CTE after drinking antifreeze to take his own life 20 years ago. CTE can only be diagnosed after death via post mortem.

In a statement, the NFL said: “We continue to grieve the senseless loss of lives, and our hearts remain with the victims’ families and our dedicated employees.

“There is no justification for the horrific acts that took place. As the medical examiner notes ‘the science around this condition continues to evolve, and the physical and mental manifestations of CTE remain under study’.”

A Sky News investigation last year explored the link between CTE and violent attacks, including mass murder.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

July: New York shooter’s note: ‘CTE study my brain please’

We looked at the case of former high school football player Noah Green. He was 25 when he crashed into a security cordon protecting the capitol building in Washington DC and stabbed police officer William Evans to death, before he too was shot dead by responding police.

Green’s mother, Mazie, told me she believes his crime was caused by brain injuries sustained on the American football field. He also had CTE.

The theory of a link between CTE and violent crime is increasingly cited in the courtroom.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

At least four dead in New York shooting

Kellen Winslow, a former NFL player, argued for his sentence for multiple rapes to be reduced because of head trauma suffered on the football field.

Former San Francisco 49ers star Phillip Adams shocked the country when he shot dead six people, including grandparents and their two grandchildren, then himself in 2021. He had severe CTE.

Continue Reading

Trending