Final 2025 NHL draft rankings: Schaefer, Misa, Hagens, then…?
More Videos
Published
4 months agoon
By
admin
-

Rachel DoerrieJun 24, 2025, 07:00 AM ET
Close- Rachel Doerrie is a professional data consultant specializing in data communication and modelling. She’s worked in the NHL and consulted for professional teams across North American and Europe. She hosts the Staff & Graph Podcast and discusses sports from a data-driven perspective.
NHL draft week is officially here, and with that come the final draft rankings.
The top 64 are ranked here, along with details of their game, areas for development, their perception among NHL scouts and an NHL projection. The final set of rankings includes combine scores and a heavier weight of scouting opinions and intel against my projection model. While some players grade at higher or lower value than in previous rankings, their position considers how likely they are to become NHL players based on their developmental needs and perception in the industry.
After Matthew Schaefer and Michael Misa, there is almost no consensus in this draft. For example, some teams have players ranked in the 20s that others do not have on their draft list at all. Part of this is related to the fact that teams are valuing different attributes — be it skill, grit, size, playoff performance, etc. — and place higher value on players who fit their organizational mantra. More than in previous years, some players might fall in the draft because another player is higher on a specific team’s list. This could lead to teams trading up to grab players they believe have fallen too far to ignore.
The most important thing to remember is that a player’s success or failure is not dictated by his draft slot, but who he becomes in the years that follow. It is true that earlier draft picks get many more chances than late ones regardless of talent, but that doesn’t mean some gems won’t be found later in the draft. In fact, given the desire for size, truculence and hard skill over high-end talent, it is fair to suggest we might see more success from draft selections outside the first round than in previous years.
Here are the top 64 prospects, along with some players who deserve honorable mention:
![]()
1. Matthew Schaefer, D, Erie (OHL)
The Erie Otters defender is projected to become a true No. 1 cornerstone for years to come. A dynamic presence at both ends of the ice, the 6-foot-2 blueliner skates with ease and elite mobility to shut down opponents in all situations, while creating offense with quality transition play.
Though an injury at the IIHF World Junior Championships — where he was set to play a key role as a 17-year-old — cut his season to just 26 games, Schaefer still logged over 25 minutes per contest, and consistently drove play in his team’s favor.
Executives and scouts view him as a future elite NHL defenseman and a foundational piece for a championship-caliber roster. Schaefer’s ability to control play from the blue line, play tough matchups, and run a power play — combined with the belief in his character and leadership — result in many believing that Schaefer has the tools to become a top-10 defender in the league, while wearing a letter as part of a team’s leadership group.
![]()
2. Michael Misa, F, Saginaw (OHL)
Granted exceptional status in the OHL in 2022, Misa delivered one of the most remarkable goal-scoring seasons in recent memory in 2024-25, netting 62 goals in just 65 games. He projects to be a top-line forward capable of consistently exceeding 90 points per season in the NHL.
Misa’s offensive instincts are elite. He processes the game at a high level and executes at top speed. Scouts believe he is NHL-ready and has the potential to become an elite top-line center. Away from the puck, Misa excels at finding soft areas in coverage and has a flair for delivering in clutch moments. His combination of high-end playmaking and goal-scoring ability makes him a constant dual threat in the offensive zone.
His two-way game has taken a noticeable step forward with improved backchecking, defensive awareness and commitment to a 200-foot game. Paired with his explosive speed and offensive firepower, Misa profiles as a foundational player.
![]()
3. James Hagens, F, Boston College (NCAA)
Hagens is projected to be a top-line center, or one of the NHL’s best second-line centers. He lacks the dynamism of Misa, opting for a highly cerebral and efficient play style. He brings a good work rate with excellent speed and passing ability that should see him effectively drive play at the NHL level. Scouts and executives are impressed with the professional details of his game (puck support, winning battles, defensive puck play), and they believe it will ease the transition to the NHL while he finds his offensive gear.
Another season at Boston College to further develop a more a dynamic offensive gear to become a top-line NHL center — the one that had scouts impressed during his NTDP season (with 102 points) — could be the remedy. After playing on one of college hockey’s top lines with Gabe Perreault (New York Rangers) and Ryan Leonard (Washington Capitals), Hagens would now be relied upon to drive his own line, create offense through his own playmaking and play a significant matchup role.
Hagens has the potential to be the complete package in the NHL. His understanding of spacing and ability to anticipate stands out among his peers. He’s smaller and slighter than other prospects, which worries some teams, but there’s a mix of Clayton Keller and Jack Hughes in him in terms of transition play and creativity.
![]()
4. Porter Martone, F, Brampton (OHL)
A big, cerebral forward, Martone is a dual-threat offensive player with ability to score on his own and facilitate. He projects to be a second-line scoring winger who should see top power-play minutes.
His competitive nature will make him an effective agitator as he learns to physically impose himself on opponents. He needs to hone the competitiveness and physicality to increase its effectiveness, but he is exactly the type of player teams covet because of the unique combination of offensive talent and competitive fire.
Martone’s ability to score and make plays will make him a difficult player to defend in the NHL. There are concerns about Martone’s speed and skating posture. His speed has improved this season, but Martone needs to add explosiveness to his skating to hit his ceiling.
His unique combination of scoring ability, size and hard skill make him a very attractive prospect. While his most confident projection is as a top-six forward, Martone has a legitimate chance to become a top-line winger if his skating improves.
![]()
5. Anton Frondell, F, Djurgardens (Allsvenskan)
Frondell is a versatile two-way forward that plays both center and right wing. His flexibility is attractive to teams, although many believe he is most likely to reach his potential as a winger in the NHL.
Frondell is coming off one of the most productive seasons by an under-18 player in Allsvenskan history, giving him a confident projection as a first-line NHL forward. He’s a cerebral player, who picks apart defenders in one-on-one situations and defensive coverage in offensive zone play. The details of Frondell’s game are translatable, including excellent forechecking ability, willingness to attack the middle of the ice and high-end anticipation on both sides of the puck.
He has shown play-driving capabilities against men in the Allsvenskan, which has translated to the NHL for other prospects in the past. He’s projected to produce between 75-85 points per season. His style of play translates well and has executives excited about his ability to step in the league in the next 18 months.
He impressed during the physical testing and interview portions of the scouting combine, leaving many teams impressed. His two-way ability combined with great anticipation and a high-end shot make him one of the more exciting prospects in the class.
![]()
6. Roger McQueen, F, Brandon (WHL)
Described as “a unicorn” because he’s a 6-5 center who skates with the speed and mobility that you would expect from a smaller player, McQueen has been a hot topic all season.
He profiles as a prototypical modern-day power forward who blends soft skill with physicality. Elite right-handed centers are rare in the NHL, and McQueen’s size and willingness to physically dictate play adds undeniable value. He has professional defensive habits that are translatable to the NHL, and unique offensive upside that is still developing given the loss of playing time due to injury during his draft season.
McQueen dominates the cycle game, creates offense on the rush and uses his physical gifts to dominate the cycle and protect pucks. His projection as an elite top-line center lacks confidence, due to lack of playing time from his back injury. Without the injury, we might be discussing McQueen near the top of this draft class because his package of skating, skill and physical gifts are rare, and the type of toolbox of which executives dream.
He is a textbook case of high-risk, high-reward player; however, his performance at the scouting combine went along to proving his back injury had healed completely. Playing against tougher competition, where McQueen will be forced to develop his ability to protect himself, the puck control and ability to create offense against bigger bodies will be important. If developed without setback, he could become a two-way force in the NHL for years to come.
![]()
7. Caleb Desnoyers, F, Moncton (QMJHL)
Desnoyers might go a lot higher than where I have him, because he could be one of the best two-way players in the draft. Described as a “coach’s dream” because of his ability to take an offensive or checking assignment and execute consistently. He makes smart, simple plays, provides a physical presence on the forecheck and generally agitates and makes life difficult on defenders.
He projects to be a quality second-line center with a decent chance of becoming a first-line player. He’s cerebral, with quick hands and playmaking ability. He’s not flashy, but he’s consistently effective and makes intelligent plays with the puck.
Executives love hearing the word “reliable” from scouts, and that word is perfect to describe Desnoyers. He’s at his best when he’s in pressure-packed games because he finds a way to make the necessary plays to win. Many scouts believe he will be a leader in the NHL, with solid play on both sides of the puck, in all situations.
As one scouting director described “he’s the type of player you win with.” Some have quietly compared him to Patrice Bergeron and Jonathan Toews, who are lofty comparisons, to say the very least.
![]()
8. Jackson Smith, D, Tri-City (WHL)
Smith is a big, physical defenseman with untapped offensive ability and is the consensus second-best defender in the draft class behind Schaefer.
He possesses all the qualities of a top-four matchup guy. He defends the rush well, closes gaps and steers the play in transition, making him one of the best neutral-zone, transition defenders in the class. Given the importance of transition defense in a matchup role, Smith has a real chance to the guy coaches rely upon to play heavy minutes against the best players.
His blend of skating, size and poise with an offensive game that progressed positively as the season wore on makes me a believer that there is more to give, and playing at Penn State next season should help it along.
Smith stands 6-3, and executives love the simplicity of his game, reading pressure, disrupting plays and making effective passes to exit the zone. He lacks explosive skating, and the consistent creativity required to be a quality offensive contributor at the NHL level, but his reads are there to be a plus transition player and join the rush as a support player.
Smith’s development from here will be about using his excellent mobility to prevent rush offense and becoming a more consistent offensive threat with better puck management. If Smith can drive play on both sides of the puck in transition and become a power-play threat, there’s a real chance he becomes a No. 2 defender at the NHL level.
![]()
9. Jake O’Brien, F, Brantford (OHL)
Deceptive and incredibly smooth, O’Brien projects to be a point-producing, top-six center with a chance to become a top-line center. The right-handed pivot is one of the best playmakers in the draft, creating high-danger chances with regularity; for my money, he is the best pure creator in the draft.
He consistently manipulates defenders, distributes the puck on the forehand and backhand and uses fakes that send turn defenders and goalies into pretzels. The development will come from simplifying offensive plays to eliminate turnovers caused by holding the puck for too long.
O’Brien’s shot is going to be a necessary development area if his passing is to be an elite threat in the NHL. There is risk here, because he’s slighter than other players available at the center position, but he has room to fill out over the next few years. O’Brien’s elite playmaking skills will be that much more valuable if he can add a speed gear and increase his shooting threat.
He’s two or three years away from playing an impactful role in the NHL, and patience could be the key to O’Brien reaching his top-line ceiling. If he does, he’s going to be an elite power-play quarterback and offensive driver.
![]()
10. Victor Eklund, F, Djurgardens (Allsvenskan)
Eklund projects as a top-six forward with a good chance of becoming a top-line contributor. There’s a distinct possibility he falls out of the top 10 this week, which would mean extreme value for anyone who selects him. Despite concerns about his size — he’s 5-11, 161 pounds — Eklund’s style of play is very translatable to the NHL. He plays a lot bigger than his measurements suggest, and there is room to add strength. Should he grow, which has happened to other prospects in the past, Eklund’s projection becomes more confident as a 70-point producer with a high-end motor and excellent forechecking capability.
Eklund is excellent in transition and attacks defenders with speed and fearlessness, darting to the inside, and positioning his body to win or protect pucks. His smaller size has forced him to learn how to protect the puck with excellent body positioning. If he develops a bigger, stronger frame, those skills will make him even more difficult to defend in the offensive zone.
His off-puck play is mature, and will quickly earn the trust of NHL coaches. Eklund has the potential to be a difference-maker in a second-line role, and his blend of hard-nosed play with soft skill should translate more seamlessly than other players.
![]()
11. Carter Bear, F, Everett (WHL)
Bear is the type of player that a team looking for high-end instincts and playmaking covet. Before a season-ending injury in March, Bear was one of the CHL’s most dangerous offensive players and a reliable defensive forward. He’s versatile, in that he plays center and the wing, and projects as a 65- to 75-point, second-line player, most likely on the wing.
He’s a quality playmaker using different passes to create advantages in dangerous areas. His ability to manipulate defenders and create space for teammates while pulling coverage towards him should translate well in the NHL. He’s got good hands in tight spaces, which make him a threat around the net, and is one of the best offensive facilitators in the draft class.
On top of his offensive gifts, Bear’s defensive play makes him a quality two-way player. His stick positioning allows him to disrupt passes, and he’s a tenacious forechecker who tracks well on the backcheck and finishes hits. His skating posture needs to be more upright to allow him to develop a more explosive stride to take advantage of his offensive skills in transition, but the instincts and execution of plays already exist.
Bear is a good mix of soft and hard skill with projectable traits on both sides of the puck, and he is the type of player who should thrive in a matchup role while contributing offensively.
![]()
12. Radim Mrtka, D, Seattle (WHL)
A 6-6, right-handed defenseman with decent mobility who plays in all situations has scouts very excited, and he could be the second defenseman drafted on Friday. He’s very difficult to get around, routinely thwarting attackers in their tracks and killing plays. He projects as a top-four, shutdown defenseman because of his excellent stick work, mobility and transition defense. Mrtka uses his mobility to escape pressure, activate in the rush and make quality passes to the middle of the ice.
Mrtka should develop into a strong transition defender, a reliable penalty killer and efficient puck mover. He shoots the puck hard and could become more of a scoring threat if he can pick his spots to get pucks through. While everything flowed through him in Seattle, there are well-placed concerns about his lack of offense.
His size and physicality give him the tools to develop into a minute-munching, shutdown defender if his mobility continues to progress. His late birthday gives him lots of development runway to refine his skating, offensive playmaking, and physicality in all areas of the ice.
![]()
13. Brady Martin, F, Sault Ste. Marie (OHL)
A Swiss Army knife type of player who will be most effective on the wing because of his strong wall play, Martin projects as a middle-six forward capable of scoring 20 goals routinely, with upside as a second-line forward.
He’s a wrecking ball that will bring value in all three zones, on and off the puck. Martin has scouts raving about him after an excellent performance at the IIHF under-18 championship, with many opining that he could go very early in the first round. He’s a workhorse without an off switch, who brings a blend of physicality and hard skill. He’s a nightmare to contain with his brute strength, and forces defenders into precarious positions with good speed and willingness to make “winning” plays.
Martin finds ways to get involved physically if he doesn’t have his “A” game offensively, and executives love that. If Martin’s scoring doesn’t translate, he’ll be a valuable third-line pest.
Several teams mentioned how impressive Martin was during interviews at the combine. Combine an attractive personality with the hard-nosed style, and it forms a rare combination that is valuable to many scouts who believe he’s the type of player teams need to win in the playoffs. Surely, his mention of Conn Smythe winner Sam Bennett as a role model grabbed attention. He will likely be long gone by the early teens — but that does not devalue the players who will be selected after him.
![]()
14. Justin Carbonneau, F, Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL)
Carbonneau possesses an offensive toolbox that teams covet, including powerful skating and eye-popping creativity. He projects as a second-line scoring forward with significant variance and is likely to end up as a middle-six player who thrives against secondary matchups. Carbonneau can drive offense with his playmaking and shooting ability and plays a well-rounded offensive game that includes playing through contact, excellent puckhandling skills and above-average skating.
As is the case with any player who possess incredible upside, there is inherent risk. He has a physically mature body (6-1, 191 pounds), and will need to adjust to the speed of the professional game. He thrives when given time and space, and his growth will come from learning to simplify his offensive play and make better decisions with the puck. There are tools to become a very effective power forward in the NHL who can score 25 goals if he adds a cerebral component to his game.
![]()
15. Lynden Lakovic, F, Moose Jaw (WHL)
The 6-4 left winger has translatable scoring ability, and excellent speed for his size. With room to fill out his frame, Lakovic is an attractive prospect.
He attacks with linear crossovers using his big frame to protect the puck, and he makes plays using good deception. He has the potential to be a dual-threat winger at the NHL level if his passing translates the way many believe his shooting will. Lakovic projects to be a middle-six winger with fair confidence because of his scoring ability, speed and size, but there is a chance he becomes a second-line scoring threat.
Lakovic’s development will come on the physical side. While he is supremely skilled, he needs to lean on defenders and force his way to middle ice to take advantage of his quick hands and shot. If he does, he becomes a significantly more dangerous player, as he’ll be a threat in transition and off the cycle. That is certainly a developable skill that translates to any level, and combined with quality offensive instincts and skill, could see Lakovic become a dual-threat, 65-point winger.
![]()
16. Logan Hensler, D, Wisconsin (NCAA)
The 6-2 defender projects to become a second-pair blueliner that excels in transition. He is one of the best neutral-zone defenders and puck movers in the draft, who steadily improved as a true freshman in the NCAA. His puck retrievals, breakout passes and offensive-zone passes consistently put his team in more advantageous attacking positions. Being a right-handed defender with excellent mobility and an easily translatable game makes Hensler a very attractive prospect in this class.
The are concerns among NHL scouts related to Hensler’s offensive abilities and how he might fare in the NHL. However, Hensler showed flashes in the back half of the NCAA season, drawing defenders in and making slick plays for high-danger scoring opportunities. He’s unlikely to become a 60-point defender, but 35-45 points as a steady transition defender who plays a shutdown role seems to be the appropriate projection.
His NHL-ready frame is a plus, and will only improve throughout his collegiate career, which is likely to be another two seasons.
![]()
17. Braeden Cootes, F, Seattle (WHL)
Cootes is likely to be the first center taken in the back half of the first round and will be a target for teams looking for a two-way, high-motor center. He lacks explosive offense, but with some development of his shooting mechanics, he could become a 60-point, two-way center. Scouts love how consistently he moves his feet throughout his shifts, his drive to play through the middle of the ice and his ability to create advantages for himself with his skating and compete level.
His ability to create space for his teammates and move the puck to advantageous areas of the ice is highly translatable. He’s proactive with his contact, moves the puck to the middle of the ice and is reliable on both sides of the puck, in every area of the ice.
A strong skater and leader, his floor is likely a third-line checking center, but the potential for him to become a two-way, second-line center should be attractive to teams who are willing to bet on offensive development.
![]()
18. Cameron Reid, D, Kitchener (OHL)
There’s a lot to love about Reid’s game — and a lot of varying opinions. Some scouts see him as a top-15 pick, others see him as a mid-20s pick, and it all hinges on their belief in his offensive game. Reid is a play driver from the back end with excellent puck-moving skills and excellent skating. He flashes high-end offensive ability in the form of setups and moving to find and create passing lanes to high-danger areas; however, his shot will need to become more of a threat to avoid his distribution being neutralized in the NHL.
In transition, he’s one of the best on both sides of the puck. His smooth puck retrievals — where he constantly shoulder checks and scans to avoid pressure — led to efficient breakouts. When under duress, he uses elite edgework to escape and shake pressure, following with a quick outlet pass to beat the forecheck.
The consensus belief is that he’s a middle-pairing, transition defender who can turn into a bona fide No. 3 if he develops his offense and grows an inch or two; currently he’s listed at 5-11.
![]()
19. Kashawn Aitcheson, D, Barrie (OHL)
There’s a very real chance that Aitcheson is drafted near the top 10 given the type of game he plays and the thirst among NHL teams for bite on the back end.
His projection as a No. 4/5 defender sees him below other players with higher upside. Aitcheson plays with all kinds of truculence and aggression, while possessing an aura of confidence on and off the puck. He’s got all the makings of being a complete menace who plays tough minutes as a No. 4 defender.
Whether it is a preseason game or the playoffs, Aitcheson plays the same rough style, and is unafraid of lowering the boom on opponents. He needs to pick his spots better to avoid unnecessary penalties, but he’s the type of player that requires opponents to be aware when he’s on the ice. Scouts see him as hard-nosed, two-way defender with significant bite who can be a momentum-shifter with his physical presence.
He needs development time, as his skating and playmaking are very raw, but the competitive attributes and his development curve this season are very promising. Aitcheson’s offensive involvement developed as the season progressed, rotating with his teammates, diving down towards the high-danger area and becoming more dangerous with open ice.
He’s likely two or three years away from being ready to step in. But when he does, he’s exactly the type of defender every coach and GM want on their team.
![]()
20. Cole Reschny, F, Victoria (WHL)
The two-way center brings an excellent mix of hockey sense, playmaking and creativity to be a middle-six contributor capable of consistently producing 60 points. He lacks elite skating, but his combine results raised eyebrows — tying Frondell for tops in VO2 max. While that isn’t indictive of NHL success, it shows a particular dedication to conditioning, and those in NHL circles pay attention to those results.
Reschny is smaller — 5-10, 183 pounds — and relies on his cerebral approach and excellent passing abilities to create advantage all over the ice. He processes the game better than many in the draft class, allowing him to manage pressure and put himself in better puck-protection positions.
Defensively, Reschny’s instincts result in positionally sound play, regularly playing above the puck, disrupting passes, and communicating assignment switches. He’s got the potential to be a great two-way complementary center that creates offense without separating speed. His reads will almost surely see him play a penalty-killing role and someone who is relied upon when his team is holding a lead.
![]()
21. Benjamin Kindel, F, Calgary (WHL)
Kindel is a scoring machine. Following a 60-point rookie campaign in the WHL in 2023-24, he vaulted into elite status this season, finishing seventh in overall scoring, and was excellent at even strength.
Though undersized at 5-10, 176 pounds, Kindel blends pace, vision and quality instincts, and he projects to be a middle-six winger with two-way ability. Kindel’s motor is relentless, which makes up for his lack of speed, and enables him to weave through traffic and execute give-and-go’s with ease. A dual-threat attacker, he pairs an accurate shot with dangerous passing ability. His elite hockey sense allows him to consistently outsmart opponents and set teammates up with creative plays in dangerous areas with time and space, while playing positionally sound hockey off the puck.
Defensively and on the forecheck, Kindel leverages his intelligence, anticipation and effort to win battles despite size disadvantages. He’ll need to refine and improve his skating posture and puck control, while adding another speed gear to succeed in the NHL.
While the potential exists for Kindel to a top-six NHL player, he is more likely to find himself in the middle-six as a complementary piece.
![]()
22. Cullen Potter, F, Arizona State (NCAA)
Potter is a dynamic skater who is the fastest straight-line skater in the draft class, and his explosive mobility ranks among the draft’s best. Making an uncommon jump from the NTDP’s under-17 team straight to NCAA play, Potter displayed elite acceleration and agility, effortlessly shifting from stride to crossover and cutting sharply through defenders. Initially reliant on raw skill, Potter often avoided physical battles and forced “hope plays,” limiting his effectiveness in the first half of the NCAA season.
Potter’s evolution in the second half of the season elevated his game dramatically, and it was impossible not to notice. He embraced defensive responsibilities, improved his physical play despite his 5-10 frame, won puck battles and filled lanes on the backcheck. Potter’s positional play improved, and his off-puck play improved as a result.
The added defensive dimension complements his offensive talents, elevating his floor to a bottom-six checker, while his upside is very high as a top-six forward because of his steep development curve. Development of his transition play and learning to use his explosive skating and accurate shot while changing gears will make him a more dangerous offensive threat.
![]()
23. Malcolm Spence, F, Erie (OHL)
Spence projects with confidence as a high-energy, two-way winger suited perfectly for a Stanley Cup contender’s third line. He possess a relentless motor, physical tenacity, and professional defensive habits. There are well-placed concerns that his game lacks a true dynamic offensive element, but the current form of his game easily translates to NHL, with a higher floor than other players in this area of the class.
At his best, Spence is a disruptive force, ferocious on the forecheck, relentless on the wall and defensively reliable. He thrives alongside skilled teammates, creating space through with his effort, and the ability to capitalize on scoring opportunities in dangerous areas of the ice. Scouts like Spence’s game-changing impact, particularity his forechecking, success in puck battles and ability to draw penalties.
His offensive growth plateaued this season and has tempered expectations about his ceiling. His projection as a third-line winger with a bottom-six floor is related to that scoring plateau. If Spence can assert physical dominance, playmaking consistency and see an uptick in scoring, there is a chance he becomes a secondary contributor in the middle six. Regardless, Spence’s blend of competitiveness, professional details and defensive reliability makes him a solid bet to become a key commentary piece on a contender who likely excels as the game gets more physical.
![]()
24. Joshua Ravensbergen, G, Prince George (WHL)
Ravensbergen is the clear-cut top goaltender prospect in this draft. He projects a composed, confident demeanor, with a confident projection as a starting NHL goaltender who can handle a significant workload.
At 6-foot-5, he leverages size, elite anticipation and crisp lateral agility, consistently positioning himself perfectly to deny shooters without unnecessary flash. He tracks the puck a level above his peers, which allows him to confidently challenge shooters and cut angles effectively. He is particularly vulnerable through the five-hole, which isn’t atypical for large goalies who hover sticks above the ice. As he develops and refines his technique, this weakness should be corrected long before he reaches the NHL.
A reliable backstop for Prince George, Ravensbergen’s .901 save percentage stands out even more when considering the high-danger chances he regularly faced. His rebound control is well above average, and he has an above-average glove hand. He regularly has his blocker angled well, enabling him to direct shots safely away from danger.
It is likely that Ravensbergen becomes a platoon starter until his mid-20s, when he is capable of become a full-time NHL starter who plays 60-65 games per season.
![]()
25. Blake Fiddler, D, Edmonton (WHL)
Fiddler is one of the draft’s most intriguing defenders with his blend of size (6-4), mobility and untapped upside.
With NHL family history (Vernon Fiddler is his father), he performed well on the international stage, leaving scouts and executives believing that his defensive-zone dominance and transition skill will make the NHL transition easier. Fiddler’s defensive toolkit stands out. His mobility lends itself to tight gap control, balanced pivots and high-quality neutral-zone defense. Physically imposing, he consistently disrupts opposing attacks, maintains strong body positioning, and proactively eliminates threats away from the puck while staying positionally sound.
Defense is his clear calling card, but Fiddler flashes creativity on offense. He manipulates defenders with fakes, executes difficult breakout passes under pressure, and flashes high-end puck skills on occasion.
To reach his ceiling of a second-pairing defenseman, Fiddler will need to refine his reads, timing, and decision-making to limit miscues with the puck. He’ll likely require patience over the next few years, but with continued development in gap control, awareness and physical engagement, he profiles confidently as a reliable second-pair shutdown defender capable of driving play in transition.
![]()
26. Jack Nesbitt, F, Windsor (OHL)
Nesbitt is an intelligent, two-way center whose game is rooted in competitiveness, defensive reliability, and off-puck hockey IQ. He excels defensively by using his 6-4 frame to break up plays with physical engagement and smart stick positioning to pick off pucks. His hockey sense consistently places him in strong positions in all three zones, allowing him to create turnovers and execute quick passes to create dangerous chances off those turnovers.
His offensive upside hinges on his skating, which is a concern. His stiff skating stride and lack of demonstrated flexibility at the combine might limit how much he can improve. Despite flashes of skill, he struggles to maneuver past defenders, and his inconsistent puck handling under pressure often disrupts his playmaking.
Nesbitt showed improvement throughout the season, leveraging his size offensively and initiating more contact more consistently. If these improvements continue, and he’s able to improve his skating stride, he projects confidently as a dependable middle-six center who can anchor a defensive line and support skilled players higher up the lineup.
![]()
27. Sascha Boumedienne, D, Boston University (NCAA)
One of the most discussed and debated defenders in the draft, Boumedienne projects as a second-pair, two-way defender.
Already known as a brilliant breakout passer with a heavy slap shot and strong stick play, Boumedienne’s defensive game evolved noticeably at Boston University. Buoyed by steadily improving his skating weaknesses, particularly his agility and edge work, he looked the part of a modern shutdown defenseman, specifically in transition. He developed greater stability, enabling more effective gap control and quicker pivots. Proactive reads, strong positioning, physicality and effective disruption of passing lanes allowed his defensive game to blossom.
While his offensive game remains primarily rush-based rather than in the offensive zone, Boumedienne’s willingness to experiment with fakes and deception improved his transition impact significantly. The volatility of his projection remains high, but Boumedienne’s substantial in-season growth, defensive reliability and refined skating offer realistic upside as an effective second-pair, two-way defender at the NHL level who can produce secondary offense.
![]()
28. Ryker Lee, F, Madison (USHL)
One of the most skilled and creative forwards in the draft, and some scouts have him ranked in the late teens because of their belief in his upside.
Lee is a dynamic offensive player who consistently cuts through defensive coverage with elite puckhandling and deceptive passes. His one-timer is one of the best in the draft class. With a full complement of high-end tools, Lee has a rare ability to create offense in tight quarters with limited space, and he stood out amongst his USHL peers. He manipulates defenders and delivers elite passes under pressure. He consistently makes translatable plays like one-touch breakouts, fake receptions, and quick releases in scoring areas. As the season progressed, he showed a willingness to forecheck, battle and apply pressure defensively.
The glaring question is his skating. His stride is stiff and lacks explosiveness. Lee will need major strides in mobility to maximize his offensive toolkit at the NHL level. That being said, if he adds a step or two to pair with his skill, Lee has the skill to become a creative, middle-six playmaker with top-six upside.
![]()
29. Jack Murtagh, F, USNTDP (USHL)
Murtagh emerged as a versatile, energetic winger and cemented himself as the NTDP’s most compelling prospect in a down year.
He plays a relentless style and possesses an explosive stride, thriving in puck battles, consistently leveraging his straight-line speed and physicality to power through opponents and create scoring chances. He owns a strong shot package, including an explosive one-timer, and Murtagh is equally dangerous off the rush. Murtagh’s development as a playmaker elevated his stock in the eyes of scouts. He regularly demonstrated above-average awareness, impressive passing skill to get the puck to the most dangerous areas of the ice. His ability to complement scoring with high-level distribution should continue to develop at the NCAA level at Boston University.
To unlock a clear NHL middle-six ceiling, Murtagh must diversify his transition approach, use teammates more consistently and rely less exclusively on raw speed and power. Even without dynamic creativity, his tenacious style, goal-scoring instincts and improved playmaking project safely to a third-line NHL power forward role.
![]()
30. Bill Zonnon, F, Rouyn-Noranda (QMJHL)
Zonnon is a relentless and detail-oriented two-way forward who has carved out a reputation as one of the CHL’s hardest-working players. With an 83-point breakout campaign in his first full-time season at center, Zonnon combined a high-end motor, raw but effective playmaking and relentless puck pursuit that allowed him to be a play driver in all three zones. He excels on the forecheck, pressuring defenders into rushed decisions, winning battles and moving pucks to teammates in scoring areas.
Offensively, he makes good reads under pressure, threading pucks through tight lanes and consistently puts his team in advantageous positions. His ability to support defensively, facilitate transitions and physically impose himself makes him ideal the type of forward teams want in the playoffs.
His skating remains a limiting factor, and he’ll need to improve his agility and posture to reach his offensive ceiling. If Zonnon can refine his stride and continue to develop his playmaking, he projects as a middle-six driver who blends tenacity and has the makings of a valuable third-liner whom playoff teams covet.
![]()
31. Shane Vansaghi, F, Michigan State (NCAA)
A steady riser as the season progressed, Vansaghi is a tenacious power winger whose physical dominance and competitive fire make him one of the most NHL-ready players in the draft. Many nights, he looked like a man among boys with excellent forechecking, delivering punishing checks to defenders who were retrieving pucks, and bulldozing through contact to establish inside position.
Offensively, Vansaghi showed flashes of legitimate upside, with good puckhandling, a heavy release that caught goaltenders by surprise, and the ability to beat defenders one-on-one. His net-front play and ability to win body position in tight areas shows that he might be an effective net-front player at the NHL level if he can deflect pucks and knock rebounds home.
His skating lacks explosiveness and agility, and will need significant revamp which might be tough given his physical maturity. If he can make improvements to his first few steps, Vansaghi could evolve into a middle-six force who complements skill with relentless physical play.
![]()
32. William Moore, F, USNTDP (USHL)
Moore remains one of the more intriguing upside bets despite a plateau in development over two seasons with the NTDP.
The feeling among scouts is that Moore’s plateau is related to the structure the NTDP plays with, in that it stifles creativity, and I would agree with that assessment. Moore is a skilled forward with strong skating, good puck skill and offensive instincts. He has moments of absolute brilliance, manipulating defenders with crossovers, threading look-off passes and showcasing high-end puck protection.
At his best, Moore combines finesse with power, winning battles along the wall, creating screens and asserting body position to generate offense. It is a quality blend of hard and soft skill. He excels in possession and can command shifts with deceptive movement and slick hands in tight space. The lack of consistency in his play leads to questions about what type of player Moore can be at the NHL level.
A lack of physical strength and assertiveness without the puck lessens his impact more often than not, leading to quiet nights and “invisibility” monikers. If Moore can raise his engagement level and improve strength, there is real second-line potential at the next level. Otherwise, he projects as a versatile third-line forward who can contribute on a second power-play unit and provide complementary offense.
![]()
33. Nathan Behm, F, Kamloops (WHL)
Behm is a dynamic winger with the skill to develop into a middle-six NHL scorer and an outside shot at becoming a second-line scorer. He combines creative playmaking, deceptive shooting, and above-average puck handling to generate offense. He beats defenders by manipulating them and using his reach to pull pucks through traffic. His soft hands allow him to catch pucks effortlessly and execute quick slot passes and shots.
He has an NHL-ready build, but he’ll need to improve pace and engage physically to reach his potential. If he can develop and refine those areas, he projects as a dual-threat offensive forward in a scoring role; without it, he settles into a bottom-six forward. As a player available late in the first round or in the second, he’s a worthwhile swing on upside.
![]()
34. Cameron Schmidt, F, Vancouver (WHL)
The goal scorer is likely to go a lot lower than I have him, but his scoring ability is among the best in the draft class. He possesses elite finishing skill, high-end speed and above-average puck handling.
He scores in a variety of ways: off the rush, through traffic, and on one-timers. He’s difficult to read because he’s deceptive in his movements to find or create space. Despite his 5-7 frame, Schmidt adds a rare physical edge and flashes playmaking quality.
For obvious reasons, scouts and executives question whether or not he can be effective at the NHL level — the numbers suggest he has a legitimate shot if he grows to 5-9. He’s a boom-or-bust pick; if he rounds out his playmaking and utilizes his full offensive toolkit on a consistent basis, Schmidt could become a dynamic second-line scorer and one of the draft’s biggest steals.
![]()
35. Henry Brzustewicz, D, London (OHL)
Brzustewicz is the next prospect from the factory that is the London Knights. The blueliner projects as a steady, mobile transition defender with the potential to grow into a No. 4 or 5 NHL blueliner.
A right-handed shot with a strong defensive foundation, he maintains good gap control, moves the puck very well and supports plays while remaining positionally sound. In an elevated role, his offensive creativity developed dramatically. He jumped into the rush, evaded forecheckers and created scoring chances with quality passes to the slot.
If he continues to develop his confidence and play-driving ability, Brzustewicz could evolve into a reliable second-pairing defender. Without that growth, he still holds value as a depth puck mover with a good defensive foundation.
![]()
36. Cole McKinney, F, USNTDP (USHL)
Not unlike his teammates, McKinney likely had his offense stifled with the program, and there were signs that he has more to give. He projects as a competitive third-line center with above-average two-way play. The NTDP’s leading scorer — and one of the USHL’s most efficient producers — McKinney’s standout attributes include relentless puck pursuit, smart positioning and strong penalty-killing instincts.
Offensively, he thrives off the cycle, supports play with timely passes and quick decisions and is an above-average net-front presence. While his puck handling and shooting limit top six upside, some scouts believe there is more upside as a middle-six player. At a minimum, his motor, defensive value, and play-driving habits give him a clear path to a bottom-six NHL role.
![]()
37. Milton Gästrin, F, MoDo (J20 Nationell)
Gästrin is one of the most well-rounded and translatable two-way centers in the draft, projecting as a reliable third-line NHLer.
He combines high-end defensive instincts, strong off-puck support and a relentless motor to have many scouts believing he’ll be a reliable checking center. His playmaking continues to develop and might give him more offense than currently projected, but he’d likely top out between 30 and 40 points.
Gästrin is a reliable play driver, and coaches will be comfortable playing him in all three zones. While he lacks dynamic offensive upside, his intelligence, versatility, and steady skating development make him a low-risk bet to become an effective bottom-six center.
![]()
38. Václav Nestrašil, F, Muskegon (USHL)
Nestrašil is a high-upside power forward who projects as a top-six NHL winger if his development continues on its current path.
He is a unique blend of above average puck skill and playmaking with size, motor and punishing physical play. He excels with give-and-go’s, attacking off the wall, and creating space in traffic. He consistently moves the puck through carries or passes to the middle of the ice, creating more threatening opportunities.
He is raw and somewhat erratic with his reads and timing; his continued improvement and physical toolkit give him legitimate upside. If he becomes a more consistent threat, he’s a second-line force; if not, his defensive value and intensity still project a role as a physical, bottom-six winger.
![]()
39. Carter Amico, D, USNTDP (USHL)
Amico is a 6-5 right-handed defenseman with the mobility, physicality and defensive instincts to grow into a No. 4/5 NHL blueliner. Injuries are a concern, but when healthy, he kills rushes with aggressive gap control, clears the crease with authority — a trait NHL scouts love — and starts breakouts with a good first pass.
Offensively, he shows flashes of playmaking, but limited reps and inconsistencies (partly due to a knee injury) leave questions about how high the ceiling is. If he stays healthy and continues to develop his transition game at Boston University, Amico has the tools to become a physical, play-driving defender with No. 4 upside.
![]()
40. Jacob Ihs-Wozniak, F, Lulua (J20 Nationell)
Ihs-Wozniak is a goal-scoring machine with one of the best finishing touches in the class. He possesses an arsenal of shot types that are NHL-caliber, has great off-puck instincts and a developing playmaking side. That combination of offensive skills gives him legitimate middle-six scoring upside. He times his movements for rebounds and slot chances very well, making him difficult to tie up. He’s not a play driver, but his frame, scoring touch and offensive instincts make him a good bet to be a complementary player.
To reach his ceiling, Ihs-Wozniak will need to improve his speed, which will improve his play in transition and his play along the wall. His potential as a power-play threat and goal scorer boost his NHL floor to a third-line player.
![]()
41. Eric Nilson, F, Djurgardens IF (J20 Nationell)
Nilson projects as a defensively reliable, bottom-six checking center with penalty-killing value. A fluid skater with a high motor and strong two-way instincts, he consistently supports play in all three zones, eliminates space on the backcheck, and was one of the top defensive forwards at Sweden’s J20 level.
Offensively, he can drive transition play and showed flashes of playmaking and a shot that could develop into a threat. Scouts question his willingness to drive the middle of the ice, given he’ll need to do that to be a two-way player at the NHL level. He’ll need to develop his playmaking and fill out physically to reach his potential. If he can develop those traits and combine them with his sound defensive play, he’ll likely carve out a bottom-six role in the NHL.
![]()
42. Benjamin Kevan, F, Des Moines (USHL)
Kevan is a skilled and speedy winger who projects as a potential middle-six scoring threat if he rounds out his game. A dynamic skater with elite transition ability and flashy puck skill, Kevan creates off the rush with give-and-go’s and creative passes. He uses his speed defensively to pressure puck carriers on the backcheck.
Kevan needs to develop his offensive-zone play to be a more well-rounded offensive threat. If he adds strength and an element of physicality, Kevan could evolve into a two-way, play-driving winger. He’s an upside bet with his skill set, but likely ends up an AHL scorer if he can’t polish his offensive-zone play.
![]()
43. Alexander Zharovsky, F, Tolpar Ufa (MHL)
Zharovsky has some of the best hands in the draft class, without a doubt. He’s an elite puck handler with high-end creativity and offensive instincts that make him one of the most skilled European forwards in the draft.
After a slow start, he exploded for 46 points in 29 MHL games and held his own in KHL playoff action. Zharovsky manipulates defenders to create for both himself and teammates, showing dual-threat potential as a scorer and playmaker. His skating and defensive play need development, but his raw skill ceiling is undeniable.
He is a boom-or-bust winger, but his performance at the KHL level is an indicator that he’s likely to be successful in the NHL. With proper development, he could become a middle-six scorer and power-play threat in the NHL.
![]()
44. Max Pšenička, D, Portland (WHL)
One of the biggest risers in the back half of the season, Pšenička projects as a two-way, shutdown defenseman with the tools to become a reliable No. 4/5 at the NHL level. He brings good speed, physicality and smart defensive reads, consistently forcing dump-ins and battling for position. Offensively, he shows flashes of creativity on breakouts and rush activation, and development in puck control and passing precision will only boost his offensive projection.
His aggressive play and competitiveness make him a playoff-type defender. At 6-4 and 176 pounds, there is more than enough room to fill out his frame, which is likely to make him a strong net-front presence in the NHL. If he continues to develop his offensive game and adds strength, Pšenička has the upside to become a reliable second-pair defender with some grit.
![]()
45. Kurban Limatov, D, MHK Dynamo Moskva (MHL)
Limatov is a high-upside, boom-or-bust defenseman with second-pair NHL potential. He possesses elite mobility and physical tools, and at 6-3, his explosive skating allows him to evade forecheckers and drive play in transition.
As the season progressed, his defensive reads improved and allowed him to play with more physicality and aggressiveness. Offensively, Limatov is raw and somewhat chaotic, but there are signs of creativity. If he continues to improve his decision-making, he could become a dynamic two-way defender. If not, he might remain a high-minute KHL player, but the NHL upside makes him an intriguing player in the second round.
![]()
46. William Horcoff, F, University of Michigan (NCAA)
The son of former NHLer Shawn Horcoff, William projects as a defensively reliable third-line center with size, strength and strong off-puck instincts. At nearly 6-5, he’s a disruptive force in his own zone, using his range and physicality to pressure puck attackers and cause turnovers.
Offensively, he facilitates with smart passes and uses his size to play with contact and protect the puck. He’ll need to develop his skating from a speed and mobility perspective to grow offensively. If he adds a step with some explosiveness and fills out his frame, Horcoff could become a physically imposing, two-way pivot in a bottom-six NHL role who plays against secondary matchups.
![]()
47. Daniil Prokhorov, F, MHK Dynamo St. Petersburg (MHL)
The best way to describe the 6-5 Prokhorov is a freight train on skates.
A physically dominant winger with middle-six power forward upside, he is one of the most physically imposing players in the draft. He delivers punishing hits, protects the puck well and drives the net with force. His heavy shot and straight-line speed contributed to a 20-goal MHL season, with flashes of puck skill.
He needs to develop his hockey sense, and he seems to get tunnel vision, which limits his playmaking and overall decision-making. If he improves his reads and off-puck awareness, Prokhorov could become a rare, punishing middle-six winger. Without growth, he still has a direct path to a depth NHL role through sheer physicality and size.
![]()
48. Jack Ivankovic, G, Brampton (OHL)
Ivankovic projects as a poised, technically sound platoon starter with the upside to become a No. 1 NHL goalie. Despite standing under 6 feet, he possesses elite skating, excellent positioning and controlled, patient movements that allow him to track and handle chaos with ease.
A standout for Hockey Canada and under-18 gold medalist, he plays bigger than his size, reading screens and staying composed under pressure. Height remains the key concern among teams, but his father is 6-5, so there is hope that Ivankovic grows another couple of inches. If he does, his mental makeup and technical foundation make him a good bet to be one the best goaltenders in the class.
![]()
49. Luca Romano, F, Kitchener (OHL)
A high-speed center with a great motor who projects as a middle-six, two-way forward, Romano has play-driving value in transition. He thrives off the rush, using speed and edge work to carry pucks through zones and create chances while keeping his feet moving.
Defensively, he’s a relentless backchecker with good positioning and strong stickwork. He lacks dynamic offensive creativity, but flashes of playmaking and shooting in stride have me believing there is more to give offensively. If he develops his creativity and learns to use the space he creates with his speed, Romano could evolve into a reliable middle-six center with speed and two-way ability.
![]()
50. Mason West, F, Edina High (USHS-MN)
Without a doubt, the best overall athlete in the draft class. A high school quarterback with legitimate college football potential and a hockey player who could go in the top 50 of the NHL draft does not come around too often.
The 6-6 forward possesses rare mobility, physical tools and intriguing upside. A natural shooter and smooth skater, his production on the Minnesota High School circuit at Edina High was impressive. When he stepped into the USHL, his development hit warp speed.
For obvious reasons, West is very raw as a prospect. He shows flashes of skill, an immovable net-front presence and growing physical engagement. Given his rawness, he will need to develop his puck control, positioning and decision-making. However, he will be able to rely on his QB scanning skills to help develop his decision-making in hockey. With continued development, there is a real chance he becomes a middle-six NHL power forward. The pure raw ability of this elite athlete has executives and scouts very excited.
![]()
51. Jacob Rombach, D, Lincoln (USHL)
Another of the really tall and mobile defensemen in this draft, Rombach has scouts believing in his shutdown ability.
The 6-6½ defender projects as a second-pair shutdown defenseman with elite defensive instincts and good puck retrievals. What separates him from similar defenders is that he handles pressure well. He shoulder checks on retrievals, scans coming up ice, absorbs contact and escapes pressure with smart passes.
He won’t be an offensive contributor, but he could develop into a plus transition player offensively. To reach his ceiling, Rombach needs to improve his skating posture, which will allow him to be more physical. With continued development at the University of Minnesota, he could become a quality shutdown defender in a top-four NHL role.
![]()
52. Eddie Genborg, F, Linkoping HC (J20 Nationell)
Genborg projects as a bottom-six checking winger with a strong chance to play NHL games thanks to his size, physicality and professional details. At 6-2, he’s a relentless forechecker with a great motor, plays a strong cycle game and is excellent defensively. Genborg impressed by earning over 20 SHL games this season and leading Sweden’s J20 league in goal pace, which buoys his NHL projection confidence.
His scoring should translate because it comes via net-front positioning and a good catch-and-release shot. While his offensive ceiling is limited by instincts and average playmaking, his blend of strength, effort and two-way value gives him a clear NHL path as a physical depth forward.
![]()
53. Semyon Frolov, G, MHK Spartak Moskva (MHL)
A steady riser in the rankings, Frolov projects as a 1B platoon goaltender with the potential to push for a larger role.
At 6-3, Frolov blends strong puck tracking and athleticism with smart positioning. He’s calm under pressure, sharp with his save selection and excels when facing high-danger chances. His aggressive play style adds value and could become a strength if developed well.
Splitting time across three MHL teams, he showed adaptability and consistency behind varied defenses and should have little issue adjusting to a KHL role next season. There are some who believe Frolov will go early in the second round, as his size, pure athleticism and demeanor are attractive to teams.
![]()
54. Matthew Gard, F, Red Deer (WHL)
Gard projects as a reliable bottom-six checking center with the motor, size and defensive IQ to earn an NHL role. He excels at pushing attackers to the perimeter, disrupting attacks and forechecking. Gard plays with nonstop energy, combining strength and good body positioning to win battles and create space for his teammates.
While he’s primarily a defensive player, there are signs that further developing his playmaking and speed could increase his offensive output. If his offensive development plateaus, Gard’s high motor, detail-oriented game makes him a strong bet to anchor an NHL fourth line, because he’s exactly the type of player coaches trust in the defensive zone and on the penalty kill.
![]()
55. Ivan Ryabkin, F, Muskegon (USHL)
One of the most polarizing players in the draft class, Ryabkin is a boom-or-bust power forward with middle-six upside. He blends a quick release, creativity and punishing physicality, albeit very inconsistently.
After a slow start in Russia, his move to the USHL reignited his game, where he became a top goal scorer in the second half. He’s a threat off the rush with one-timers and in-tight finishes, and there are flashes of playmaking ability. His inconsistent pace, poor decision-making and undisciplined physicality limit his reliability and NHL potential.
If he can dial in his effort and details, Ryabkin’s unique blend of skill and grit could make him a dangerous NHL scorer. Otherwise, he’s unlikely to be an NHL player, which is why he’s a candidate to fall out of the top two rounds.
![]()
56. Ethan Czata, F, Niagara (OHL)
Czata projects as a bottom-six checking center with strong defensive instincts, penalty-killing value and underrated playmaking ability. Despite a drop in production, his defensive play was impressive, with good positioning, physicality and ability to disrupt plays.
Offensively, he shows flashes of quality passing ability and spatial awareness, especially off the puck. His responsible two-way game and hard skill make him a strong candidate for an NHL depth role, but he’ll need to add some speed and develop his offensive playmaking ability to be anything more than a fourth-line center.
![]()
57. Charlie Trethewey, D, USNTDP (USHL)
Trethewey projects as a No. 4/5 two-way defenseman with a blend of powerful skating, physicality and a heavy shot.
As the season progressed, he improved his scanning, stickwork and breakouts, and he become a steady shutdown presence for the NTDP. He takes away time and space, delivers punishing hits and activates with confidence. The next step is to improve his decision-making and passing when he activates.
As his defensive details and play under pressure continue to develop, Trethewey’s strong physical tool kit gives him legitimate NHL potential as a hard-nosed, second-pair defenseman.
![]()
58. Theo Stockselius, F, Djurgardens (J20 Nationell)
Stockselius projects as a third-line, two-way forward with strong playmaking instincts, hard skill and projectable physical tools. A quality passer with high-end hockey sense, he consistently creates offense with intelligent playmaking and passing.
He led Djurgardens in playoff scoring and became a key contributor for Sweden’s under-18 team. As the season progressed, Stockselius started to physically engage and use his body more effectively, which should only improve as he physically matures.
He is a below-average skater in terms of speed and mechanics, and will likely need to improve that to hit his ceiling as a middle-six contributor. If he does not improve his skating — but can continue compensating with smart positioning and physical play — he’s likely to become a bottom-six contributor in the NHL.
![]()
59. Haoxi (Simon) Wang, D, Oshawa (OHL)
Haoxi Wang is a true project with second-pair NHL upside because he has a rare blend of size (6-6) and elite mobility.
A late arrival to competitive hockey, Wang is still learning the game but shows potential to become two-way defenseman by eliminating space, escaping pressure and skating pucks through transition. OHL competition exposed his rawness as a prospect, with inconsistent reads and turnovers, but he consistently improved his retrievals, breakouts and defensive play.
With significant development, Wang could become a rangy, shutdown defenseman with decent puck-moving ability. He’s a high-risk, high-reward swing who will test any team’s development staff.
![]()
60. L.J. Mooney, F, USNTDP (USHL)
It remains to be seen where the diminutive Mooney will go, but he’s one of my favorites in the draft class. He’s a high-energy winger with explosive speed, quick hands and a motor that doesn’t have an off switch. He’s dynamic off the rush and consistently beats defenders with his speed and puck handling.
Despite concerns about his 5-7 frame and questionable decision-making, he has more separating skills than many in this area. Many smaller players don’t play the defensive side of the puck, but that doesn’t describe Mooney. He’s consistently above the puck, in good positions and far more physically engaged than anyone his size — as well as most who have 5 inches and 25 pounds on him.
The fact that he thrives in chaos makes me believe his hockey sense and decision-making will improve. If he develops his playmaking, Mooney could become a middle-six spark plug with two-way impact who provides complementary scoring.
![]()
61. Hayden Paupanekis, F, Kelowna (WHL)
If a team wants a versatile Swiss Army knife type of player who can fill many roles, this is their guy.
Paupanekis showed two sides this season: shutdown specialist in Spokane, and play driver in Kelowna. A competitive, physical center with NHL-ready defensive detail, Paupanekis consistently shut down opposing top lines. He is not special at anything, but he does everything at an average or better level, and plays a professional style. He stays above the puck, supports his teammates, wins battles and it doesn’t hurt that he’s 6-4. His skating and hands allow him to manage pressure and make plays at speed, showing there is more offensive upside to give.
While his scoring instincts are a work in progress, his speed, strength and penalty-killing potential give him a clear bottom-six NHL projection with room to grow into more.
![]()
62. Tyler Hopkins, F, Kingston (OHL)
Hopkins projects as a bottom-six forward with a projectable defensive game and the motor to be reliable in a checking role. He defends with pro details, remaining patient, engaging physically and disrupting plays both on the forecheck and in transition. With good puck protection skill, he wins many of his puck battles.
Offensively, he makes efficient passes and has the skating to beat other players to pucks. While his offensive upside is limited, his playmaking has some developable traits. Given Hopkins’ high floor as penalty-killing, reliable two-way forward, he’s what scouts call a “safe bet” to reach the NHL as a fourth-line forward.
![]()
63. Peyton Kettles, D, Swift Current (WHL)
At 6-5, Kettles has a good blend of size, physicality and strong defensive instincts. Trusted in all key defensive situations, he uses his long reach and good positioning to close gaps, force attackers to the perimeter and win battles along the boards.
His puck moving is limited, which is likely related to his risk-averse style, but he did show flashes of being able to make plays under pressure. His skating and mobility need to develop for his play under pressure to improve, but he’s one of the youngest players in the draft class and has a longer development path than most. Kettles has the tools to become a dependable, hard-to-play-against blueliner in a No. 4/5 shutdown role.
![]()
64. Kristian Epperson, F, Saginaw (OHL)
Epperson made the most of his second draft-eligible season, earning top-line minutes next to Michael Misa and proving he could drive play on his own. He’s a relentless forechecker who reads the play to time his routes and stifles the breakout.
Epperson has a good blend of above-average playmaking, good hockey sense and a nonstop motor. He creates space, plays connected with his linemates, and supports plays across all three zones. He’ll need to add a step or two to be effective at the NHL level.
While he remains a project, the combination of two-way play, puck-moving skill and hockey sense gives him a shot at carving out a third-line NHL role.
Honorable mentions
Adam Benak, F, Youngstown (USHL)
Aleksei Medvedev, G, London (OHL)
Conrad Fondrk, F, USNTDP (USHL)
Malte Vass, D, Farjestad (J20 Nationell)
You may like
Sports
Preds irked as Wild net winner with net displaced
Published
41 mins agoon
November 5, 2025By
admin

-

Greg WyshynskiNov 5, 2025, 12:35 AM ET
Close- Greg Wyshynski is ESPN’s senior NHL writer.
The Nashville Predators disagreed that a “weird” Minnesota Wild overtime goal scored with the net displaced Tuesday night should have counted.
Wild forward Kirill Kaprizov sent a pass across the crease to teammate Marcus Johansson just as Predators goalie Justus Annunen pushed the net off its moorings. Johansson’s shot hit the side of the net as the cage continued to slide out of place. He collected the puck and then backhanded it over the goal line and off the end boards with the net dislodged.
The referee signaled a goal at 3:38 of overtime, and it was upheld after an NHL video review. Minnesota won, 3-2, overcoming an emotional letdown when Nashville’s Steven Stamkos tied the score with just 0.3 seconds left in regulation.
“The explanation was that, in [the referee’s] opinion, it was a goal. I disagree with his opinion, but that’s the way it is,” Nashville coach Andrew Brunette said.
Stamkos wasn’t pleased with the goal call after the game.
“Obviously, a weird play. I can see the confusion, but the confusing part for us was why it was so emphatically called [a goal]. I get it. Listen, the net came off. If the puck goes in right away, no problem if the net is off. But he missed the net, and the puck actually bounced back to him because the net was sideways,” he said.
The NHL’s Situation Room upheld the goal because it felt Annunen caused the net to be displaced prior to an “imminent scoring opportunity” by Johansson and cited Rule 63.7 as justification. The rule reads:
“In the event that the goal post is displaced, either deliberately or accidentally, by a defending player, prior to the puck crossing the goal line between the normal position of the goalposts, the Referee may award a goal. In order to award a goal in this situation, the goal post must have been displaced by the actions of a defending player, the attacking player must have an imminent scoring opportunity prior to the goal post being displaced, and it must be determined that the puck would have entered the net between the normal position of the goal posts.”
Stamkos didn’t believe that Johansson’s goal-scoring shot was only made possible by the net having come off its moorings.
“I understand the net came off. I don’t think there was any intent from our goaltender to knock it off — it came off twice today. From our vantage point, we thought the puck came back to him on the second attempt because the net was off. If not, the puck goes behind the net, and we live to fight another day. So, that’s where we didn’t agree with the call,” he said.
Brunette doesn’t believe his goalie intentionally pushed the net off its moorings.
“I don’t think just by the physics of pushing that’s what he was trying to do. I thought they missed the net. If the net didn’t dislodge, you would have ended up hitting the net,” he said.
“Unfortunately, they didn’t see it the same way. And you move on.”
This was the second win in a row for the Wild, moving them to 5-6-3 on the season. Nashville dropped to 5-6-4, losing its second straight overtime game.
“We deserved a lot better, for sure. One of our best games of the season, for sure,” Stamkos said.
Sports
Week 11 Anger Index: BYU’s long-standing beef with the CFP committee
Published
3 hours agoon
November 5, 2025By
admin

-

David HaleNov 4, 2025, 08:22 PM ET
Close- College football reporter.
- Joined ESPN in 2012.
- Graduate of the University of Delaware.
The College Football Playoff committee has released its first top 25 ranking of the season, which is the sport’s version of Walmart opening its doors at midnight on Black Friday. Things are about to get ugly, and someone’s going to end up bloodied while fighting Oklahoma for a spot in the top 12. In other words, it’s the best time of year.
This year, the committee has said it is considering a new “record strength” metric, designed to provide some math-based guidance in the process and to soon replace “game control” as the country’s most hated made-up statistic.
Ten weeks into a season filled with a lot of chaos and few seemingly great teams, however, the committee needs all the help it can get. For example, just eight teams in the country have already beaten more than one of the committee’s current top 25 — and one of those eight teams is NC State. Utah, Iowa, Oregon, Pitt, Washington, Missouri and Tennessee — all ranked this week — are a combined 0-12 against other teams in the committee’s top 25. The ACC doesn’t have a team ranked higher than 14th, and the Group of 5 doesn’t have a team ranked at all, making these rankings less about the coveted top 12 than a need to be in the top 10.
In other words, there’s a lot still in flux as we dive deeper into the final month of the season. But that means our anger toward the committee is just simmering for now, waiting for the rage to boil over in the weeks to come.
Still, a few schools have a pretty good case for outrage already.

![]()
In all the hubbub over last year’s final playoff rankings that left a trio of SEC teams out, what went overlooked was that BYU might have had more to be angry about than Alabama, Ole Miss or South Carolina. Two of those teams, at least, had taken a bad loss. Each of those teams had three losses. BYU, on the other hand, checked in on the committee’s final ranking behind each of them despite a 10-2 record and two close losses to solid teams.
So, certainly the committee would feel some compassion for the Cougars this year and consider the Cougars with a bit more optimism, right?
Ah, no.
Let’s take a look at some blind résumés.
Team A: No. 3 strength of record, No. 33 strength of schedule, 4-0 vs. SP+ top-40 opponents, best win vs. No. 11 in the committee’s poll.
Team B: No. 4 strength of record, No. 45 strength of schedule, 3-0 vs. SP+ top-40 opponents, best win vs. No. 13 in the committee’s poll.
Sure, Team A has a slight edge, but the résumés look pretty similar.
Well, Team A is the committee’s No. 1 team, Ohio State. Surely, if another team’s résumé looks more or less the same, that team would be staring down a bye in the first round of the playoff, right?
Nope. Team B is BYU, and the Cougars sit behind three SEC teams with a loss, all three of which are ranked lower in ESPN’s strength of record metric.
Given that BYU has a massive showdown with Texas Tech upcoming, perhaps the committee just punted on any tough decisions on the Cougars for this week. After all, given how much love the committee has shown the Big Ten in these rankings, punting would be a fitting play.
![]()
We get it. As a conference, the ACC might, in fact, just be an episode of “Punk’d” that Ashton Kutcher started in 2008, then got distracted and forgot to let everyone know it was a prank. The conference’s train wreck in Week 10 certainly showed up in these rankings — more on that in a moment — but it’s almost as if the committee just threw Louisville into the mix, deciding the Cardinals were guilty by association.
Let’s take another look at some blind résumés, shall we?
Team A: No. 10 strength of record, No. 58 strength of schedule, one win vs. SP+ top 40, best win vs. committee’s No. 13 team, lone loss vs. an unranked team.
Team B: No. 13 strength of record, No. 56 strength of schedule, three wins vs. SP+ top 40, best win vs. committee’s No. 18 team, lone loss to committee’s No. 14 team.
This is basically a coin flip, though given the additional wins vs. high-level opponents and a better loss, it would be hard to argue against Team B, right? Add to that, Team B’s lone loss came in double overtime in a game when it outgained its opponent by 150 yards. Surely, you would be on Team B’s side now, right?
Well, not surprisingly, Team B is Louisville. Team A is Texas Tech, ranked seven spots higher at No. 8.
![]()
There seems to be a desire to write Miami off because of two losses in the past three games and given the strife the team seems to be enduring on offense, perhaps that’s wise.
But two things are supposed to be true of the committee’s evaluation process. One, the committee is not supposed to care when wins and losses happen. Losing in September isn’t better than losing in November. A loss is a loss. Second, the committee is not supposed to make assumptions about the future. Sure, Miami’s offense is a mess at the moment, but assuming that will result in future losses isn’t part of the deal.
And yet, putting Miami at No. 18 — eight full spots behind another two-loss team the Canes beat head-to-head — can only be explained by the vibes. Notre Dame’s season is rolling right along now. Miami has hit some stumbling blocks. Never mind the Canes are two late Carson Beck interceptions away from still being undefeated. Never mind that Miami has four wins vs. FPI top-35 teams, twice as many as any other two-loss team except Oklahoma. Never mind that Miami has that head-to-head against the No. 10 team in the committee’s rankings or that it walloped a Florida team that took No. 5 Georgia to the wire and actually beat No. 11 Texas. Never mind that Miami beat a then-ranked USF by 37.
Instead, the committee has assigned Miami to the scrap heap now — which is a shame because Miami would probably have done this to itself anyway, and it’s so much funnier when it happens in the last game of the season.
4. The Group of 5
A year ago, Boise State found its way into a first-round bye ahead of the champion of a Power 4 league, which was probably pretty embarrassing for that Power 4 league except that the ACC embarrasses itself often enough to be pretty well immune to shame.
The rules have changed this year. The top four conference champs aren’t guaranteed a first-round bye now. But that doesn’t seem to have stopped the committee from stacking the deck anyway, just to be safe.
Not one team outside the Power 4 found its way into these initial rankings, though the committee notes that Memphis currently is in the lead for the long Group of 5 playoff bid.
So, surely the Group of 5 should be pretty upset, right?
Yes, but not about being snubbed from the top-25 party. None of the leaders in the Group of 5 have a great case — certainly none like Boise State had a year ago. But Memphis? Really? The same team that lost by a touchdown to a UAB team had just fired its coach?
In the committee’s new guidance to consider record strength, there is an assumption that really bad losses are weighted heavily, but that certainly hasn’t been the case this time around.
North Texas has one loss to SP+ No. 27.
James Madison has one loss to SP+ No. 16 (and the No. 15 team in the committee’s rankings).
San Diego State has one loss to SP+ No. 73 has one loss to SP+ No. 119.
Memphis has one loss to SP+ No. 119.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the Tigers weren’t punished at all for a terrible loss.
![]()
5. The SEC
The latter half of the committee’s top 25 is usually the equivalent of the phone lines for a Finebaum episode — just a place where a lot of mediocre SEC folks hang out, patiently waiting for their turn. But this time, the committee has stuffed the bottom of the rankings with Big Ten teams — No. 19 USC, No. 20 Iowa, No. 21 Michigan and No. 23 Washington — and that might actually matter in the long run.
One of the committee’s favored metrics is wins over ranked opponents. We’re dubious about how many Big Ten teams deserve a little number next to their name. The league still has four teams that have yet to win a conference game, and the bottom third is a complete dumpster fire. It’s easy to rack up some wins when half your conference schedule has already been embarrassed by UCLA’s interim coaching staff.
But the SEC — that’s where the real depth is. Nearly half the SEC’s conference games this season have been one-possession affairs. Mississippi State, a team that had gone nearly two years without an SEC win, already knocked off last year’s Big 12 champ. LSU, a team that fired its coach, has a win over last year’s ACC champ. Florida beat Texas. Putting a bunch of undeserving teams at the bottom of the rankings only serves to prop up the résumés of teams such as Oregon, which hasn’t beaten anyone of consequence. And frankly, the committee is supposed to do that for the SEC, not the Big Ten.
Also angry: Virginia Cavaliers (8-1, No. 14, behind four two-loss teams), USF Bulls (6-2, unranked), Arizona State Sun Devils (6-3, unranked), Cincinnati Bearcats (7-2, unranked), Brian Kelly (just angry for other reasons).
Sports
CFP Bubble Watch: Where do things stand following the first committee ranking?
Published
3 hours agoon
November 5, 2025By
admin

The ACC is already playing from behind, and it’s only the first ranking of the season. With no teams ranked in the College Football Playoff selection committee’s initial top 12 on Tuesday night, the lone ACC team in the bracket if it were released today would be No. 14 Virginia. The Cavaliers would earn a spot as the fourth-highest ranked conference champion.
As for No. 17 Georgia Tech and No. 18 Miami? Not even a head-to-head win against the No. 10-ranked Fighting Irish was enough to keep the Canes within playoff range after their loss at SMU.
It’s far from over, as teams still have ample opportunities to build — or bust — their résumés. Separation, though, is starting to occur, and the Bubble Watch is tracking it for you. Teams with Would be in status below are in this week’s bracket based on the committee ranking. For each Power 4 conference, we’ve also listed Last team in and First team out. These are the true bubble teams hovering around inclusion. Teams labeled Still in the mix haven’t been eliminated but have work to do. A team that is Out will have to wait until next year.
The conferences below are listed in order of the number of bids they’d receive, ranked from the most to least, based on the selection committee’s first ranking on Tuesday night.
Jump to a conference:
ACC | Big 12 | Big Ten
SEC | Independent | Group of 5
Bracket

SEC
Would be in: Alabama, Georgia, Ole Miss, Texas A&M
![]()
Last team in: Ole Miss. The Rebels are currently in a safe spot, but they’re not a lock if they don’t run the table. With remaining games against The Citadel, Florida and at rival Mississippi State, there’s no possibility of a “good loss” remaining, and historically, losing in November has been far more damaging to playoff hopes than losing early. Ole Miss shouldn’t lose; it’s favored in each of its remaining games by at least 72% and has the seventh-best chance in the country (55.4%) to win out. If an upset occurred, though, the Rebels would join the two-loss club and might not win a debate with other two-loss teams that had more statement wins — and didn’t lose to an unranked opponent. The Rebels’ remaining schedule strength is No. 56 in the country. With a second loss, Ole Miss would be banking on wins against Oklahoma, Tulane and LSU to impress the committee enough for an at-large bid.
![]()
First team out: Texas. The Longhorns got a significant boost this week in part because three teams above them fell out — Vanderbilt, Georgia Tech and Miami — but also because they earned another CFP top 25 win against the Commodores. The head-to-head win against Oklahoma could also help them in the committee meeting room. If Texas is ranked No. 11 or No. 12 by the committee, though, and the ACC and Group of 5 champions are outside of the committee’s top 12, then the Longhorns would be elbowed out during the seeding process to make room for the fourth- and fifth-highest ranked conference champions, which are guaranteed spots in the playoff.
Still in the mix: Missouri, Oklahoma, Vanderbilt. The Sooners earned a huge résumé boost with their win at No. 25 Tennessee and have a CFP top 25 win against Michigan. For two-loss Vandy, a close road loss to Texas isn’t an eliminator. Missouri’s lone losses were to Alabama and Vanderbilt, but the Tigers don’t have anything yet to compensate for it. That could change on Saturday with a win against Texas A&M.
Out: Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi State, South Carolina, Tennessee
Big Ten
Would be in: Indiana, Ohio State, Oregon
![]()
Last team in: Oregon. The one-loss Ducks have a more challenging second half of the season, and the committee is about to learn how good this team truly is. So far, Oregon’s best win was Sept. 13 at Northwestern. The Ducks have been passing the eye test, but their opponents have a winning percentage of 47.2% — ranked No. 116 in the country. The committee will still respect the double-overtime win at Penn State but also recognize the Nittany Lions weren’t playing at an elite level even with James Franklin on the sideline. With road trips to Iowa and Washington — both respectable two-loss teams — and a Nov. 22 home game against USC, Oregon has a chance to further entrench itself in the top 12 or tumble out.
![]()
First team out: USC. The Trojans’ two losses were on the road to respectable teams (Illinois and Notre Dame) by a combined 12 points. Their best win was Oct. 11 against Michigan, but the Trojans could really boost their résumé this month and completely flip the script with Oregon if they can win in Eugene on Nov. 22. According to ESPN Analytics, USC has the fourth-best chance in the Big Ten to reach the playoff (18%), just ahead of Michigan. The only game it’s not favored to win is Nov. 22 at Oregon. If the Trojans can pull off that upset for a 10-2 finish, though, the committee would definitely consider them for an at-large spot.
Still in the mix: Iowa, Michigan, Washington. All three of these teams were ranked by the committee on Tuesday night, but No. 20 Iowa has the shortest climb into the conversation and gets a chance for a marquee win when it hosts No. 9 Oregon on Saturday. Michigan still has a chance to run the table and impress the committee with a win against its No. 1 team, Ohio State, but the head-to-head loss to USC will be a problem in both the Big Ten standings and the CFP ranking. If USC loses again, though, and their records are no longer comparable, it can be overcome. Then there’s a head-to-head loss to Oklahoma. Still, Michigan has a 13.2% chance to reach the playoff, according to the Allstate Playoff Predictor.
Out: Illinois, Maryland, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern, Penn State, Purdue, Rutgers, UCLA, Wisconsin
Big 12
Would be in: BYU, Texas Tech
![]()
Last team in: Texas Tech. If Texas Tech loses to BYU on Saturday but still wins the Big 12, it’s a CFP lock. The problem is if the Red Raiders lose a second conference game, then they’re going to need some help to reach the Big 12 championship. So a loss to BYU could be devastating to their conference and CFP hopes. If the Red Raiders beat BYU on Saturday but lose to it in the Big 12 championship game, they would still have a chance at an at-large bid as the Big 12 runner-up. They would be able to claim a win over the eventual Big 12 champs, which would be a much-needed boost to their résumé. It would depend in part on how the game unfolded. The Cougars are the Red Raiders’ only remaining opponent with a winning record, as they end the season against UCF (4-4) and at West Virginia (3-6).
![]()
First team out: Utah. The No. 13 Utes are in a tricky spot because their two losses are to the Big 12’s best teams — BYU and Texas Tech. Utah still has the third-best chance to reach the Big 12 title game (22.2%) but will need some help to get there. Utah’s best wins are against Arizona State and Cincinnati, but it might have a hard time earning an at-large bid without being able to beat at least one of the best teams in its league. If there is some movement above the Utes, though, they could quickly earn a promotion given their place on the bubble after the first ranking.
Still in the mix: Cincinnati. They’re included here because they still have an 18% chance to reach the Big 12 title game, according to ESPN Analytics. The unranked Bearcats have only one league loss, which gives them some slim hope. Their other loss was in the season opener to Nebraska.
Out: Arizona, Arizona State, Baylor, Colorado, Houston, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma State, TCU, UCF, West Virginia
ACC
Would be in: Virginia
![]()
Last team in: Virginia. Like Georgia Tech, Virginia has a road loss to NC State as its lone blemish, but it was an early four-point loss compared with the Yellow Jackets’ double-digit defeat. Virginia also has a head-to-head win against Louisville. That’s the Hoos’ best win of the season and their only one against a CFP top 25 opponent. Virginia would still be in, though, if it wins the ACC even if it’s ranked outside the committee’s top 12 — just like three-loss Clemson was last year.
![]()
First team out: Louisville. The Cardinals lost at home in overtime to Virginia on Oct. 4 but earned a statement win Oct. 17 at Miami. Louisville will probably have only one win this season against a CFP top 25 team, which will make earning an at-large bid difficult. Louisville’s best shot would be to run the table, have teams above it lose, and win the ACC. Louisville has a 10.6% chance of winning the ACC, fourth best behind Georgia Tech, Miami and Virginia.
Still in the mix: Duke, Georgia Tech, Miami, SMU. The odds of earning an at-large bid dropped significantly on Tuesday, but any team that has a chance to win its league will have a chance to lock up a playoff spot, and these teams are all still technically in contention to play for the ACC title. Virginia has the best chance to reach the ACC championship game (66.6%), followed by Georgia Tech (41.3%) and Louisville (33.8%), according to ESPN Analytics. Miami has only a 2.7% chance to reach the championship game — also behind Duke and SMU.
Out: Boston College, Cal, Clemson, Florida State, North Carolina, NC State, Pitt, Stanford, Syracuse, Virginia Tech, Wake Forest
Independent
![]()
Would be in: Notre Dame. The playoff stars aligned for Notre Dame in Week 10, when Vanderbilt, Georgia Tech and Miami all lost, opening the door for the 6-2 Irish to move back into the top 10 after beating Boston College. The selection committee’s decision to render the head-to-head loss to Miami moot was critical for both teams. The group rewarded Notre Dame for its eye test and recent surge during a six-game winning streak. Notre Dame has the best chance of any team in the country to run the table (64.3%), but the Nov. 15 trip to Pitt will be difficult. The Panthers are playing well, have won five straight and have a bye week to prepare for the Irish. Notre Dame’s playoff position will remain tenuous until the clock runs out at Stanford and the Irish are 10-2.
Group of 5
![]()
Would be in: Memphis. As the projected winner of the American this week, Memphis would earn a playoff spot as the committee’s fifth-highest ranked conference champion. Memphis wasn’t ranked in the committee’s top 25, but the group continues to rank teams until a Group of 5 team is included and then publicizes which one it is without revealing the full ranking and which teams might have been ahead. The Oct. 25 win against South Florida was critical in the league race, but the loss to 3-5 UAB is an ink stain on the Tigers’ résumé that can be overcome with a conference title. Memphis has at least a 57% chance to win each of its remaining games, according to ESPN Analytics.
Still in the mix: USF, North Texas, James Madison, San Diego State. The committee would consider USF’s head-to-head wins against Boise State and North Texas.

Bracket
Based on the first committee ranking, the seeding would be:
First-round byes
No. 1 Ohio State (Big Ten champ)
No. 2 Indiana
No. 3 Texas A&M (SEC champ)
No. 4 Alabama
First-round games
On campus, Dec. 19 and 20
No. 12 Memphis (American champ) at No. 5 Georgia
No. 11 Virginia (ACC champ) at No. 6 Ole Miss
No. 10 Notre Dame at No. 7 BYU (Big 12 champ)
No. 9 Oregon at No. 8 Texas Tech
Quarterfinal games
At the Goodyear Cotton Bowl, Capital One Orange Bowl, Rose Bowl presented by Prudential and Allstate Sugar Bowl on Dec. 31 and Jan. 1.
No. 12 Memphis/No. 5 Georgia winner vs. No. 4 Alabama
No. 11 Virginia/No. 6 Ole Miss winner vs. No. 3 Texas A&M
No. 10 Notre Dame/No. 7 BYU winner vs. No. 2 Indiana
No. 9 Oregon/No. 8 Texas Tech winner vs. No. 1 Ohio State
Trending
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024
