Tesla CEO Elon Musk has been talking about releasing his ‘Tesla Master Plan Part 4’ for over a year now. It has yet to come, and Tesla has yet to complete the goals in Parts 2 and 3. So I decided to come up with my own Tesla Master Plan.
Now, this post is partly tongue-in-cheek. I’m not delusional. I’m fully aware that this is unlikely to happen, but one can dream. As a long-time fan of Tesla and someone who greatly appreciates the Company’s incredible contributions to accelerating the world’s transition to electric transport and renewable energy, I like to imagine a world where Tesla can return to being something more than just a meme stock for degenerate gamblers to bet on.
Tesla was the world leader in electric vehicles, but now its core business is in evident decline. For the first time in over a decade since achieving volume production, Tesla saw its annual sales decline in 2024.
They declined by only 1%, but now they are on pace to be down more than 10% in 2025, and there is no sign of recovery. That’s happening while EV sales are surging globally. Things are expected to worsen with EVs losing incentives in the US, brand damage impacting sales in Europe, and competition eroding Tesla’s market share in China.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Tesla’s lineup is becoming stale with only a single new vehicle launched in the last 5 years, the Cybertruck, which turned out to be a commercial flop.
That’s due to CEO Elon Musk, who put Tesla all-in on autonomous driving while putting actual electric vehicle programs on the back burner.
Meanwhile, Musk has been consistently wrong about autonomous driving for years. He has promised that every Tesla vehicle produced since 2016 would be capable of unsupervised self-driving, but he was wrong about it working on the first version of hardware HW2, HW3, and now everything points to things stalling on HW4.
Separately, Musk decided to venture into politics senselessly, propagate misinformation on X, and alienate a large part of Tesla’s customer base in the process.
He gave $300 million to get Donald Trump elected, who then gave him free rein to destroy several government agencies, which happened to be investigating him and his companies, in the name of “unrooting corruption”, which never led to any charges.
Trump and the GOP campaigned on a clear agenda that went directly against Tesla’s mission and Musk helped get them elected nonetheless. He only briefly appeared to come to his senses after being pushed out of the White House last month, but he quickly got back to supporting Trump.
While doing all that, Musk also frequently violated his fiduciary duties to Tesla shareholders by starting an AI startup that competes for AI talent with Tesla and threatening shareholders not to build AI products at Tesla, despite claiming these products were critical to Tesla’s future, if he didn’t gain more control over the company.
In short, Tesla’s sales are in free fall and expected to drop even sharply next year after its least affected market, the US, removes incentives on electric vehicles.
CEO Elon Musk appears to have lost his mind and his bet on autonomous driving is simply not paying off while other companies, like Waymo and Baidu, are pulling ahead.
At this rate, Tesla is expected to go back to being a money-losing company next year as it is quickly becoming a niche automaker in Europe, it is being squeezed out of the market in China by competition, and the removal of incentives in the US next year is going to cripple its only somewhat healthy market.
In fact, Tesla is already a money-losing company when excluding regulatory credit sales, which are expected to disappear rapidly over the next few years:
With data indicating that sales are not expected to recover in Q2, Tesla is likely to maintain this clear trend through 2025.
Here are Tesla’s quarterly deliveries in Europe:
They have been steadily declining for the past two years, and while Tesla blamed the sharp drop in Q1 on the Model Y changeover, the Company is expected to perform just as poorly in Q2 based on the latest data.
The US is Tesla’s only somewhat healthy market, and this is expected to change in 2026 with the removal of the federal tax credit and the phasing out of regulatory credits over the next few years.
Things are about to get worse if nothing changes, and as much as some shareholders want to believe it, autonomous driving is unlikely to save Tesla’s financials anytime soon.
Tesla Master Plan Part 4
1- Fire Elon Musk and the board
This is the most challenging part of the whole plan, and unfortunately, nothing else works without it. Unless maybe it is revealed that Elon Musk was held against his will in a basement somewhere since 2020 and replaced by an evil clone. Unlikely.
I say it’s challenging because Tesla shareholders and the board are the only ones that can make it happen, and they are currently completely disincentivized to do it. That’s because the majority of Tesla’s current valuation (trading at nearly 200 times earnings) is based on Musk’s false promises, hype, and made-up projections about multi-trillion-dollar new ventures.
If they fire him, the stock would revert to trading on fundamentals, which would result in a significant decline. However, those fundamentals would likely improve without Musk and his brand destruction.
I previously referred to this as the Tesla shareholders’ dilemma, and ultimately, it’s Tesla’s biggest challenge right now.
Again, I completely understand that there’s no desire from the shareholder base to do that now due to the short-term impact on Tesla’s valuation. Still, they need to ask themselves: “How long can Tesla maintain this valuation if fundamentals don’t start to recover?”
There’s no sign of recovery; everything suggests that things will worsen soon, and autonomy is unlikely to contribute positively anytime soon.
I know this is the hard part, but I think more shareholders are going to start seeing problems now that ‘Robotaxi’ has been launched, sort of, and it will become clear that Tesla is facing many of the same bottlenecks in scaling as Waymo, which has a significant head start.
At some point, Musk will run out of people who believe that Tesla’s vision-only approach is a magic weapon for scaling autonomy, and those who do see the light on this issue will not return to the cult.
Yes, Tesla’s stock will drop if that happens and Musk is ousted, but the stock will eventually drop regardless if the fundamentals don’t start to recover soon.
The board, which has been protecting Musk and allowed multiple breaches of fiduciary duty, should also be ousted for meaningful change to happen.
Suprinsgly, Tesla has yet to announce its 2025 shareholders meeting, which is the only opportunity for shareholders to vote out board members and attempt to change the leadership at Tesla. Usually, it happens in June or July.
2- Make things right with customers and shareholders
After Musk is gone, this needs to be the first step in regaining customer trust and rebuilding demand.
Tesla needs to offer to reimburse everyone who bought the Full Self-Driving (FSD) package and also make a permanent open offer to transfer FSD to new cars with the latest FSD hardware – even with a discount on top.
The caveat here is that the new “FSD”, or whatever you want to call it, doesn’t come with the promise that it will eventually turn into unsupervised self-driving. This can still be the ambition (on new hardware, as I don’t believe HW4 will ever support level 4 self-driving outside of a geo-fenced area with teleoperation), but it’s not something that owners should be expecting.
Tesla has done a lot of great work in autonomous driving, but it has made promises that it can’t keep and set expectations that have created complacency, which in turn resulted in safety issues.
The company should continue developing ADAS and autonomous driving systems, but it should be way more cautious about setting expectations, and it should be more transparent with its data.
The fact that Tesla never released any FSD data other than its cumulative mileage still shocks me.
I would also like to see Tesla make things right for shareholders by suing Musk and the board for having frequently misled them with outright lies and threats, as previously explained. It would undoubtedly be a lengthy legal battle, but if successful, Tesla could recover billions of dollars that Musk and the board had taken from Tesla.
For context, Musk has made more money from Tesla, about $40 billion, by selling stocks, than Tesla made in net income throughout its entire existence: about $34.5 billion.
As for the board, they pocketed over $1 billion.
3- Buy Redwood Materials and Heron Power with stock deals to regain top talent and expand
Tesla has experienced a significant and ongoing exodus of talent for years, but this trend has accelerated substantially over the last year.
Ultimately, a company is only as good as its people. There’s still top talent at Tesla. Some are Elon loyalists who could be problematic, but others are simply talented employees and engineers who seek the opportunity to work on cutting-edge technology and share Tesla’s mission.
Nonetheless, the talent exodus has had a significant impact, and Tesla’s pace of innovation has dropped significantly.
With Musk gone, Tesla will need new leadership, and it should be easier to hire top talent with the polarizing CEO no longer at the helm.
However, acquisitions or mergers could be considered to speed up the reintegration of top talent.
I think the top targets should be Redwood Materials and Heron Power. It would bring JB Straubel and Drew Baglino, arguably the two most impactful engineers in Tesla’s 21-year history, back into Tesla’s engineering leadership.
The Redux Recycling crew, now part of the Redwood family / Credit: Redwood Materials
Approximately 120 employees of Redwood Materials were former Tesla employees, including many who Straubel handpicked for their notable impact on Tesla.
On a smaller scale and more recently, Baglino did the same with Heron to build new solid-state transformers. He recruited many veteran Tesla engineers, especially in the energy and power electronics departments.
Redwood has also recently launched a new energy storage business, in addition to its battery recycling and battery material manufacturing operations. It has become a direct competitor to Tesla Energy.
Both Redwood and Heron could help push Tesla’s energy business to the next level and keep the company’s only growing division growing.
This can be achieved through all-stock transactions. It wouldn’t cost the company anything, and it would help quickly reshape the shareholder base at Tesla.
4 – Back to the basics: expand the line-up with great and efficient electric vehicles
The EV business is significantly tougher than the energy business for Tesla, particularly in terms of demand and growth.
Musk has been betting everything on autonomous driving, but the result is that the lineup has been neglected, with only a single new vehicle introduced in the last five years: the Cybertruck, which has been a commercial flop.
I don’t claim to have a silver bullet here, nor any groundbreaking solutions, but there are several things the automaker could do to return to growth.
Obviously, I think Musk being out of the equation alone should help with demand. However, I think Tesla’s problem is way bigger: it needs a significant refresh to its lineup.
First off, Tesla execs plead with Musk not to cancel the “$25,000 Tesla” or Model 2, or whatever you want to call it. I think you have to reconsider that vehicle program right away.
I am confident that there could be other EV programs or changes to existing ones that Musk shut down amid his focus on autonomous driving at Tesla. Those should also be reconsidered.
The Cybertruck should either be scrapped in favor of a more traditional-looking all-electric pickup truck or undergo a major update. It has been a commercial flop, but there’s no denying that it garnered a lot of interest at some point. The fact that it was launched with a lot less range and a higher price is the main reason it flopped.
If that can be addressed, perhaps by utilizing different battery cells than Tesla’s own 4680, which fell short of the performance announced at Tesla’s Battery Day in 2020, it should be considered.
I’d also love to see Tesla bring some of the advancements brought to market in the Cybertruck program to other vehicles. For example, the steer-by-wire and 48-volt electronic architecture should already have been introduced in the Model S and Model X.
Tesla’s pace of innovation has slowed significantly in recent years, but the automaker still maintains a lead in efficiency among most of its competitors. I’d love to see Tesla utilize that to cover more automotive segments.
5 – Autonomous vehicles
Autonomous driving should still be a critical priority program at Tesla, but I think it should be revised. Musk backed the entire company into a corner by trashing lidar sensors for years and insisting that vision-only was the best approach.
Before he blocked me and Electrek, he actually told us in DMs that he agreed that high definition radars combined with computer vision would be safer than just vision, but he didn’t believe such a radar existed (May 2021):
When I shared such a radar with him, he ignored the comment. Furthermore, lidar sensors essentially function as high-definition radars, utilizing lasers instead of radio waves. However, combining all of them is even better, as each possesses its own advantages. Radar gathers vast amounts of data in waves, while lidar acts more like a scanner.
Musk has repeatedly and very publicly expressed disdain for lidar sensors and for self-driving companies using the technology. He started criticizing the technology when a single sensor cost several thousand dollars and Tesla was trying to build a hardware suite that would be integrated as standard on all vehicles, even if they didn’t purchase its expensive “Full Self-Driving” package.
However, lidar sensors have now become more affordable, costing only a few hundred dollars. Nevertheless, it appears that Tesla is still committed to a vision-only approach, likely due to its CEO’s very public stance against lidars.
Tesla’s HW5 suite should probably include not only a more powerful computer but also the capacity to include a radar and/or a lidar sensor.
6 -Bring back a PR department
Musk’s decision to dissolve Tesla’s PR department in 2020 was a terrible one, and it should be reversed as soon as possible.
It led to Musk being Tesla’s sole mouthpiece, and we all know how that turned out.
Tesla’s PR department was small for a company of its size and even more so for one receiving such extensive news coverage. Nonetheless, it was still successful in ensuring more accurate coverage on average.
Even in negative articles about Tesla, it would try to get Tesla’s side of the story included. Now, all you have is Musk sometimes denying news articles after the fact, and he has little to no credibility doing so after he denied several news articles that turned out to be true.
With Musk gone, a PR department would also be even more critical in trying to realign Tesla with its original mission to accelerate the advent of electric transportation and renewable energy.
The communications around Tesla’s move should explain how those moves advanced the mission. Since Musk dissolved the department and took over communications, it appears that most communications from Tesla are focused on stock pumping rather than advancing the mission.
Along with a PR department, Tesla should focus more on marketing and even advertising. Lately, Tesla appears to have fallen into the trap of legacy automakers, where electric vehicles compete with other electric vehicles. This is a dumb approach, especially in the US where EV still have an extremely low ~10% penetration rate.
With the vast majority of the market still consisting of ICE vehicles, the focus of electric vehicle markets should be on this market and how to encourage people to transition to electric vehicles.
Electrek’s Take
Again, I’m not delusional. I understand this is all extremely unlikely to happen as Musk has an incredible hold on the Tesla shareholder base, and the stock remains high.
However, shareholders could quickly turn into bagholders if Tesla’s fundamentals don’t start to turn around and the company starts losing money next year.
The primary goal of this post is to demonstrate that there’s a world where Tesla could still thrive after Elon Musk, if there’s ever a desire among shareholders to make that happen.
It wouldn’t be easy. It would require significant reforms at the company and for the company to assume the giant liability that Musk created by promising unsupervised self-driving on millions of vehicles.
I believe it’s the right thing to do and the only way I can envision Tesla regaining significant consumer trust, thereby returning to growth and positively contributing to its original mission once again.
Anything else you can think of that should be included in the plan? Let us know in the comment section below.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Last week, we reported that the e-bike world had a new motor claiming to be the lightest and most efficient. Now, we’re already seeing TQ’s new TQHPR40 motor proliferate on more road and gravel e-bikes, including the recently announced E-ASTR from Ridely.
Ridley’s new E‑ASTR brings lightweight electric assistance to its already impressive ASTR gravel platform, powered by the cutting-edge TQ HPR40 mid-drive system. Unlike bulkier e‑bike setups, this system adds just 1.17 kg (2.6 lb) at the crank and a discreet 1.46 kg (3.2 lb) and 290 Wh battery hidden within the downtube, keeping the frame’s silhouette nearly identical to the non-electric version of the same bike. According to BikeRumor, riders looking closely might spot only a slightly fatter downtube, internal cable routing, and a handlebar-end LED indicator, giving visual clues without shouting “electric bike.”
What the E‑ASTR gives up in sheer power from the petite motor, it gains in ride feel. The HPR40 is said to deliver a modest 40 Nm of torque and up to 200W of assist, or enough to smooth out climbs or offer a tailwind on gravel without overpowering the rider. With support cut off at 25 km/h (15.5 mph), pedal responsiveness remains natural and fluid. Combined with the ASTR’s race-inspired geometry, the bike looks to offer sharp handling and comfort suited to the rigors of modern gravel routes.
Ridley is currently offering the E‑ASTR in three spec levels: a value SRAM Apex XPLR AXS build €7,199 (or approximately US $8,500), a mid-range SRAM Rival XPLR AXS 1×13 version for €8,199 (or approximately US $9,700), and a top-tier Shimano GRX 2×12 Di2 model for €8,899 (or approximately US $10,500). Each features high-end drivetrains, integrated cockpit options, carbon wheels, and industry-standard gravel brakes and tires. With its race-ready frame and stealthy, lightweight e‑assistance, the E‑ASTR is positioning itself as a high-performance gravel machine that stays true to its roots, delivering help when needed, without overshadowing the rider.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Wait, you’re telling me that’s an electric bike?!
Ultra-lightweight motors like the TQHPR40 are quietly reshaping the e-bike industry by making electric assistance almost invisible, both in looks and in feel. As systems shrink and integrate more seamlessly into traditional bike frames, they’re opening the door to new categories of performance-oriented e-bikes that preserve the ride dynamics of analog bikes while offering just enough support when it counts.
For riders who value a natural pedaling experience but still want a little help on climbs or longer days, and especially for aging riders who want to maintain their riding habits despite father time taking an impact on joints and muscles, these minimalist systems are proving that you don’t need a bulky battery or a massive motor to get the benefits of going electric. The result is a wave of stealthy, high-performance e-bikes that are less about replacing effort and more about enhancing the ride.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
After a month off trying to wrap our heads around all the chaos surrounding EVs, solar, and everything else in Washington, we’re back with the biggest EV news stories of the day from Tesla, Ford, Volvo, and everyone else on today’s hiatus-busting episode of Quick Charge!
It just gets worse and worse for the Tesla true believers – especially those willing to put their money where Elon’s mouth is! One believer is set to lose nearly $50,000 betting on Tesla’s ability to deliver a Robotaxi service by the end of June (didn’t happen), and the controversial CEO’s most recent spat with President Trump had TSLA down nearly 5% in pre-morning trading.
New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (and sometimes Sunday). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Got news? Let us know! Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Hyundai is getting ready to shake things up. A new electric crossover SUV, likely the Hyundai IONIQ 2, is set to debut in the coming months. It will sit below the Kona Electric as Hyundai expands its entry-level EV lineup.
Is Hyundai launching the IONIQ 2 in 2026?
After launching the Inster late last year, Hyundai is already preparing to introduce a new entry-level EV in Europe.
Xavier Martinet, President and CEO of Hyundai Europe, confirmed that the new EV will be revealed “in the next few months.” It will be built in Europe and scheduled to go on sale in mid-2026.
Hyundai’s new electric crossover is expected to be a twin to the Kia EV2, which will likely arrive just ahead of it next year.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
It will be underpinned by the same E-GMP platform, which powers all IONIQ and Kia EV models (EV3, EV4, EV5, EV6, and EV9).
Like the Kia EV3, it will likely be available with either a 58.3 kWh or 81.4 kWh battery pack option. The former provides a WLTP range of 267 miles while the latter is rated with up to 372 miles. All trims are powered by a single electric motor at the front, producing 201 hp and 209 lb-ft of torque.
Kia EV2 Concept (Source: Kia)
Although it may share the same underpinnings as the EV2, Hyundai’s new entry-level EV will feature an advanced new software and infotainment system.
According to Autocar, the interior will represent a “step change” in terms of usability and features. The new system enables new functions, such as ambient lighting and sounds that adjust depending on the drive mode.
Hyundai E&E tech platform powered by Pleos (Source: Hyundai)
It’s expected to showcase Hyundai’s powerful new Pleos software and infotainment system. As an end-to-end software platform, Pleos connects everything from the infotainment system (Pleos Connect) to the Vehicle Operating System (OS) and the cloud.
Pleos is set to power Hyundai’s upcoming software-defined vehicles (SDVs) with new features like autonomous driving and real-time data analysis.
Hyundai’s next-gen infotainment system powered by Pleos (Source: Hyundai)
As an Android-based system, Pleos Connect features a “smartphone-like UI” with new functions including multi-window viewing and an AI voice assistant.
The new electric crossover is expected to start at around €30,000 ($35,400), or slightly less than the Kia EV3, priced from €35,990 ($42,500). It will sit between the Inster and Kona Electric in Hyundai’s lineup.
Hyundai said that it would launch the first EV with its next-gen infotainment system in Q2 2026. Will it be the IONIQ 2? Hyundai is expected to unveil the new entry-level EV at IAA Mobility in September. Stay tuned for more info. We’ll keep you updated with the latest.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.