Lee Zeldin, Chief Saboteur of the Environmental “Protection” Agency. Photo by SecretName101 on wikimedia
In an Orwellian move, the Chief Saboteur of the Environmental Protection Agency, oil industry plant Lee Zeldin announced plans to delete the EPA’s endangerment finding today, which is the EPA’s official finding recognizing the scientific reality that climate change is harmful to human health. And he’s doing it so he can raise your fuel costs, letting the oil industry extract more money from your already-strained pocketbook.
(Update: Even the Energy Department’s own numbers acknowledge this rollback will cost you money, in the form of higher gas prices by $.76/gal)
The global climate is warming, and it is warming due to human activity.
The human activity that is warming the global climate the most is fossil fuel combustion.
There are other things warming the global climate as well, including the meat industry (both through methane emissions from livestock and through deforestation of the land to grow them and their feed), construction (cement releases significant CO2, though not as much as the previous influences), and others. But fossil fuels are the primary cause.
That global temperature rise puts many ecosystems out of balance, with disastrous results for those ecosystems.
Humans rely on functioning ecosystems for their most basic needs – water, air, food, temperature regulation, and so on.
As ecosystems are disrupted, this will make humans’ lives harder and worse, and lead to greater conflict.
The fossil fuel industry spends a lot of money and effort to deny and obfuscate these facts, and their tactics have shifted over time, retreating from a hard-line “it’s not happening” position to softer-sounding, but similarly-insidious, positions that still minimize the importance of the problem or delay action.
The longer we wait to solve climate change, the harder it will be.
Thus, climate change is a huge and real problem we all need to work to solve quickly, and will require collective cooperation from everyone, whether they be corporations, media, governments, or individuals.
These are all facts that no serious person contests. Lee Zeldin, however, is not a serious person.
In exchange, what they’re getting is the deletion of actual science, the imposition of willful ignorance in a desperate plea to save their industry which kills millions per year globally.
That comes in the form of a plan to delete the EPA’s “Endangerment Finding” today, which is the scientific basis of EPA’s regulation of harmful greenhouse gases. The endangerment finding found that greenhouse gases are harmful to human health, recognizing a scientific fact that every serious person has known for a long time – but now it was at least codified into federal procedure.
It focused specifically on carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), sulfur hexaflouride (SF6), hydroflourocarbons (HFCs), nitrous oxide (N2O), and perfluourocarbons (PFCs, now more commonly known as PFAS or “forever chemicals”), all of which cause climate change.
All of these chemicals in the air have deleterious environmental effects which harm humans, and we know this to be the case.
But Lee Zeldin has bribes to answer to, so of course, we can’t let these facts get in the way.
The problem is – or at least, it’s a problem to people who are hostile to human life like Zeldin and the oil industry he so cheaply has been influenced to lick the boots of – the endangerment finding means that the government can’t just eliminate clean air rules, because eliminating clean air rules would harm people and that would be bad.
Not only would it harm people’s health, it would also raise their fuel costs – by eliminating fuel efficiency regulations, which Zeldin wants to do, so his oil industry donors can profit more off of you.
So, why not just get rid of the finding? Then we can pretend we aren’t harming people, and we can force more pollution on everyone to help our oil buddies!
That’s what Zeldin announced today that he wants to do, and the reason is because he thinks eliminating the finding will allow him to roll back fuel efficiency standards, making the cars you drive more dangerous for you, but more importantly for his greedy oil buddies, more expensive to run, which means more profits for them.
Zeldin announced the move at an auto dealership in Indiana (car dealers are another industry that has opposed environmental progress). He was joined there by Chris Wright, titular head of the Department of Energy, who is a former oil CEO (surprise, surprise).
The presence of the two showed that Zeldin is not just going rogue here, but in fact is working lock step with the squatter in the White House and the whole republican party to harm American interests by making us less healthy, less wealthy, and less competitive globally.
Zeldin also claimed that this would allow him to end an EV mandate which doesn’t actually exist, showing that he doesn’t even know the most basic information about the job he’s been thrust into.
It’s a strategy that was once fiction, detailed by George Orwell in his book 1984. In that book, an oppressive totalitarian government routinely changes facts to fit its current motives, pretending that events never happened if it deems knowledge of them contrary to the government’s current interests. Zeldin seems to think the book was an instruction manual, when in fact it was a warning against compulsive liars like himself.
However, the Clean Air Act still requires the EPA to regulate air pollutants, which the six pollutants listed above still are, regardless of whether Zeldin closes his eyes and puts his fingers in his ears. The EPA is also required to regulate these harmful pollutants by Massachusetts v. EPA, a successful lawsuit against the last unelected republican who used Orwellian tactics to try to justify harming Americans with more pollution and higher costs.
The proposed regulation will go to a public comment period, as if climate science is subject to a vote (it’s not – science is science, and facts don’t care about your feelings).
During that public comment period (which we’ll let you know about when it happens), we’re sure the majority of feedback from actual humans will be resoundingly negative on the plan to raise your fuel costs and harm your health. Sierra Club, the Environmental Protection Network, Environmental Defense Fund, and America is All In (a group of mayors, governors and former officials of the EPA and Dept. of Health and Human Services) have come out against the plan already.
But given that Zeldin’s intent is to harm Americans and help his oil buddies, we could see him trying to go through with it anyway. But if the backlash is loud enough, he may have to give up – as he did with his plan to bring asbestos back.
And, finally, just like the last time a reality TV host who got fewer votes than his opponent squatted in the White House, even if the move goes through, it is likely to be countered with legal action due to its arbitrary and capricious nature, showing clear disregard for the public interest as Zeldin, Wright and Trump try to satiate the oil industry that bribed them into the position they’ve stumbled into.
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Although the Nissan Juke EV is set to debut next year, the crossover SUV may still be offered with a gas engine after all.
Nissan looks to sell gas-powered Juke SUV alongside EV
After announcing an investment of up to £3 billion ($3.9 billion) to upgrade its Sunderland, UK, plant, Nissan revealed plans to convert three of its top-selling vehicles to electric.
The new EV models include the next-gen LEAF, Qashqai, and Juke. All will be built at the Sunderland facility as part of the Japanese automaker’s brand revamp.
Nissan is preparing to launch the electric version of its iconic LEAF hatchback later this year, followed by the Juke EV in 2026 and the Qashqai EV in 2027. According to Automotive News, Nissan is looking to keep the gas-powered Juke SUV alive for a little longer.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The Juke is Nissan’s second-best-selling vehicle in Europe, behind the Qashqai. The report claims Nissan is worried about regulations and the demand for EVs in parts of Europe.
Nissan Juke and Qashqai (Source: Nissan)
Like it did with the Qashqai, Nissan could continue selling the Juke with an upgraded hybrid powertrain. Nissan launched the next-gen Qashqai last month, claiming its e-POWER hybrid powertrain has the “best in C-Crossover segment fuel efficiency, with 4.5L per 100km and a potential range of 1,200km (WLTP).”
Although it uses an electric motor to power the wheels, it still has a gas engine that acts as a generator to charge the battery.
Nissan Juke HEV (Source: Nissan)
The next-gen LEAF, Juke, and Qashqai were expected to be a key part of Nissan’s recovery plans. After quietly delaying the electric Qashqai, will the Juke EV be next?
A report from Japan’s Kyodo News (via Reuters) last month claimed Nissan is already cutting production plans for the 2026 LEAF.
2026 Nissan LEAF (Source: Nissan)
In the US, Nissan is pushing back the production of two electric vehicles that were scheduled to be built in Canton, Mississippi. Is it time for the Japanese automaker to sound the alarm?
Later this year, Nissan will launch the new and improved LEAF EV. After dropping its signature hatchback look for a more crossover SUV-like design, the LEAF is a significant upgrade from the outgoing model, offering longer range, faster charging, and much more.
Should Nissan keep the gas-powered Juke on sale? Or go EV-only as initially planned? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The case attempts to place some responsibility on Tesla for creating complacency with drivers, who were led to believe Autopilot could do more than it actually could.
George McGee was driving his Model S on Autopilot in Key Largo in April 2019 when he dropped his phone and looked down to pick it up when the car blew past a stop sign at a T intersection, and crashed into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo were standing next to the parked Tahoe. Benavides died and Angulo was seriously injured.
The police charged McGee with reckless driving, but the families of the victims sued both McGee and Tesla. McGee settled with the plaintiffs, but Tesla hasn’t.
The trial lasted almost a month, but both parties had their closing arguments yesterday, and the jury is now deliberating.
The plaintiffs have asked the jury to award them nearly $345 million in damages, comprising $109 million in compensatory damages and $236 million in punitive damages.
They have alleged that Tesla was careless in how it released and marketed Autopilot, leading owners like McGee to become overconfident in the driver assistance system, which contributed to the crash.
Tesla has been putting all the blame on McGee, who admitted to being distracted.
The automaker has also attempted to claim that it has telemetry data indicating the driver pressed the accelerator pedal. Still, the plaintiffs’ counsel has raised concerns about Tesla’s handling of the data.
It will be interesting to see the results of this trial, which I expect to see any day now. It is a bit of a complicated case, but I don’t think the jury will take weeks of deliberation.
In recent months, Tesla settled two similar cases and we don’t know for how much.
At this point, it’s unclear why the case did not settle before trial, as the trial is not a good look for Tesla, regardless of the outcome. Tesla is working hard to keep most of the information confidential, but specific details are emerging that make the Company look bad.
It’s possible that Tesla tried to settle, but the plaintiffs wouldn’t, or Tesla felt confident about winning this case.
I wouldn’t be surprised if this specific case is being watched by many other legal teams working on other fatal crashes involving Tesla’s ADAS systems.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Despite sales in the US rising 9%, Ford’s (F) EV sales remained flat in July. Ford says the Mustang Mach-E is back on track, but CEO Jim Farley promises the company will reveal its next “breakthrough” EV in just a few days.
Ford’s US sales rise in July, but EV growth remains flat
Ford sold a total of 198,313 vehicles in the US in July, up 5% year-over-year (YOY). Although it outpaced the estimated industry average of about 5%, Ford’s electric vehicle sales fell a modest 0.2%.
With 5,308 Mustang Mach-Es sold last month, Ford said the electric SUV had its best July ever and is now ahead of its 2024 pace. The Mach-E was hit with a recall earlier this year, affecting nearly 200,000 models in the US.
Overall, Ford sold a total of 8,229 EVs in July, down slightly from the 8,242 it handed over last year. F-150 Lightning posted slightly higher sales (0.3%) with 2,831 units sold.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Meanwhile, sales of the E-Transit electric van continued slipping with only 90 units sold last month, a decrease of 89% from July 2024.
Ford Mustang Mach-E (left) and F-150 Lightning (right) (Source: Ford)
With 47,217 units sold through the first seven months of 2025, Ford’s EV sales are down 9.9% compared to the same period in 2024.
During Ford’s second-quarter earnings call on Wednesday, Farley announced that the company would unveil “plans to design and build a breakthrough electric vehicle and platform in the US.”
2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E (Source: Ford)
Farley called it “a Model T moment” for Ford, adding that it will offer “a chance to bring in a new family of vehicles” with advanced tech, efficiency, space, and features.
Rather than competing with Japanese and South Korean brands in the mass-market EV market, Ford will focus on what it does best — trucks and SUVs. Ford is developing a new, low-cost EV platform and plans to manufacture LFP batteries in Michigan, enabling more affordable and profitable electric models.
2025 Ford F-150 Lightning (Source: Ford)
The first electric model built on Ford’s new platform is expected to be a mid-size pickup truck, set to arrive in 2027. Ford will reveal more about its big EV plans on August 11 in Kentucky.
Following the success of its “From America, For America” campaign, which offered employee pricing to all, Ford launched a new promotion in July, “Triple Zero.” The new campaign offers $0 down, 0% interest, and zero payments for the first 90 days.
Looking to test one out for yourself? You can use our links below to find deals on the Mustang Mach-E and F-150 Lightning at a dealer near you.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.