Connect with us

Published

on

Figma Inc. signage during the company’s initial public offering (IPO) at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, US, on Thursday, July 31, 2025.

Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

You can almost smell the bubbly wafting across Silicon Valley.

Following Figma’s blockbuster market debut on Thursday, four of the most iconic names in venture capital — Index Ventures, Greylock, Kleiner Perkins and Sequoia — are collectively sitting on roughly $24 billion worth of the design software vendor’s stock.

Until recently, there’s been little reason to celebrate. From late 2021, when soaring inflation and rising rates pushed investors out of risky assets, until the middle of 2025, tech IPOs were few and far between, and many of the companies that managed to make it out failed to impress Wall Street. That’s left venture firms with scarce returns for the pension funds, endowments and foundations they rely on for funding.

The mood is noticeably brighter these days as the Nasdaq trades near a record.

Figma is the latest, and perhaps most high-profile, tech company to hit the market, and Wall Street appears to want more. After raising its price range this week and then pricing $1 above the top of that range, Figma shares soared 250% in their first day on the New York Stock Exchange.

Investors will admit they got lucky. Figma was supposed to get acquired for $20 billion by Adobe, an agreement the two companies forged in 2022. But the following year, the transaction collapsed after U.K. regulators said the tie-up would harm competition.

Figma is now worth more than three times what Adobe was going to pay, closing on Thursday with a market cap of almost $68 billion.

CEO Dylan Field, who co-founded the company in 2012, owns a stake worth over $6 billion. Danny Rimer, a partner at Index Ventures and Figma board member, wrote in a blog post on Thursday that the failed acquisition came with “intense pressure and a spotlight few founders ever face.”

“Dylan remained his usual grounded, transparent self,” wrote Rimer, whose firm first bet on Figma in 2013 and is the biggest shareholder, with $7.2 billion worth of stock in the company. “When the deal fell through a year later, he didn’t flinch. He turned the page and got right back to building.”

Figma shares surge in NYSE debut

Figma’s offering raised $1.2 billion, with two-thirds of the proceeds going to existing investors. Other than the small slug of stock each of the venture firms sold at $33, the rest of their holdings are subject to a lock-up period, meaning all of the current value is currently just on paper. The vast majority of outstanding shares are locked up for 180 days, so big stock sales can’t happen until January.

Stablecoin issuer Circle went public in June, and is the other tech IPO that’s generated hefty returns for VCs recently. The shares were initially sold at $31 each and are now trading at over $183, leaving investment firms IDG Capital, General Catalyst, Accel and Breyer Capital with a combined stake of close to $12 billion. Circle doubled on its first day of trading.

While IPO pops generate a lot of buzz and dramatically lift the value of investors’ holdings, they’re not universally celebrated. Bill Gurley of Benchmark has for years been a critic of such first-day gains, arguing that bankers leave money on the table for the company while handing deeply discounted stock to new investors.

In a series of posts on X on Thursday, Gurley described the Figma outcome as “expected & fully intentional.”

“Who benefits?” Gurley wrote, shortly after the stock began trading. “The large clients of the investment banks (who return the favor paying for other services). They bought it at $33 last night and can sell it today for over $90.”

Return of the exits

Still, the exuberance in the market is welcome news for most VCs.

After a record year in 2021, which saw 155 U.S. venture-backed IPOs raise $60.4 billion, every year since has been relatively dismal, according to data from University of Florida finance professor Jay Ritter. There were 13 such offerings in 2022, followed by 18 in 2023 and 30 last year, collectively raising $13.3 billion, Ritter’s data shows.

The slowdown followed the Federal Reserve’s aggressive rate-hiking campaign in 2022, meant to slow crippling inflation. As the lower-growth environment extended into years two and three, venture firms faced increasing pressure to return cash to investors.

Earlier this year, the exit environment was still looking ominous. After President Donald Trump’s announcement of sweeping tariffs in April, companies including online lender Klarna and ticket marketplace StubHub delayed their IPO plans. The Nasdaq plummeted 10% in a week, as investors fretted over the potential of rising import costs and supply chain disruptions.

But Trump later walked back his threats and the trade deals he’s landed have resulted in lower tariffs than previously feared.

Brannin McBee, Chief Development Officer and Co-founder of CoreWeave, Mike Intrator, Chief Executive Officer and founder of CoreWeave, Peter Salanki, Chief Technology Officer of CoreWeave, and Brian Venturo, Chief Strategy Officer and founder of CoreWeave, pose for photos during the company’s Initial Public Offering(IPO) at the Nasdaq headquarters on March 28, 2025 in New York City. 

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images News | Getty Images

CoreWeave, a provider of artificial intelligence infrastructure, went public just before Trump’s initial plans were announced. The stock is now almost triple its IPO price, closing on Thursday at $114.13, though that’s down about 38% from its high in June.

CoreWeave and Circle have both been big wins for investors, with their market caps now at about $56 billion and $41 billion, respectively. Figma is worth even more.

Lynn Martin, president of the NYSE, told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” on Thursday that she thinks the Figma offering “will open the floodgates.”

Figma’s early investors and big financial winners all published glowing blog posts about Field and the journey he’s been on with the company that he started after dropping out of college in 2012.

“Figma’s relentless focus on product, community, and craft has reshaped how the world designs,” wrote Greylock’s John Lilly in a post on Thursday. His firm led the $14 Series AI investment in 2015 and now owns a stake worth about $6.7 billion.

Kleiner Perkins led the $25 Series B, which was announced in 2018. Its holdings are now valued at $6 billion.

“The product was still early, but the love from its small community of users was unmistakable,” wrote Kleiner partner Mamoon Hamid, in his post after the IPO. “We were convinced that Figma had the potential to fundamentally reshape how digital products would be designed, and knew we had to be part of it.”

Two years later, venture powerhouse Sequoia stepped in to lead Figma’s $40 million Series C round. Sequoia’s Andrew Reed wrote at the time that the company had “the talent and culture to build an enduring, fundamental company.”

On Thursday, with his firm’s stake in Figma approaching $3.8 billion, Reed took to X for his congratulatory remarks.

“Congrats to the incredible @Figma team,” Reed wrote. “The most creative, determined, imaginative, and positive group of people. I’m just so happy for all of your success.”

— CNBC’s Jordan Novet contributed to this report.

WATCH: CNBC’s interview with Figma CEO Dylan Field

Watch CNBC's full interview with Figma co-founder and CEO Dylan Field

Continue Reading

Technology

Google says Fox channels to go dark on YouTube TV if agreement isn’t reached

Published

on

By

Google says Fox channels to go dark on YouTube TV if agreement isn't reached

Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

Google-owned YouTube on Monday said it may remove channels including Fox Broadcast Network, Fox News and Fox Sports from its TV streaming platform if it doesn’t reach an agreement with Fox Corporation.

YouTube TV’s renewal date with Fox is coming on Wednesday, and while the two companies have been in ongoing negotiations, they’ve been unable to reach a deal, the YouTube team wrote in a blog post. The company also emailed YouTube TV subscribers about the potential fall out with Fox.

“Fox is asking for payments that are far higher than what partners with comparable content offerings receive,” YouTube wrote in the blog. “Our priority is to reach a deal that reflects the value of their content and is fair for both sides without passing on additional costs to our subscribers.”

If YouTube is unable to reach a new agreement by 5 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, the Fox channels will become unable on YouTube TV, the Google company said. YouTube pays broadcasters like Fox to carry their channels, and a blackout could have implications on advertisers and millions of viewers who cut their cords to stream Fox’s various channels on YouTube TV.

“While Fox remains committed to reaching a fair agreement with Google’s YouTube TV, we are disappointed that Google continually exploits its outsized influence by proposing terms that are out of step with the marketplace,” the media company said in a statement.

The Fox standoff represents the latest contract dispute between content companies and delivery networks as viewers increasingly ditch cable. 

In February, Paramount Global notified YouTube TV subscribers that more than 20 channels including CBS, BET, Comedy Central, MTV and Nickelodeon could go dark on the service if the two didn’t reach a deal. Shortly after, YouTube TV and Paramount announced a multi-year distribution deal.

YouTube TV’s base plan costs $82.99 per month and includes over 100 live channels and unlimited cloud DVR. YouTube said a key part of its commitment to users is its partnership with content providers like Fox, “which allows us to carry a wide variety of channels.”

If Fox does go offline for an extended period of time, YouTube will give its members a $10 credit, the Google company wrote. Users will also be able to watch Fox content by signing up for Fox One, Fox’s streaming service, the blog said.

YouTube recently overtook Netflix, which has a market cap of $515 billion, as the top streaming platform in terms of audience engagement. Google does not provide official subscriber numbers for YouTube TV, but in its February 2024 letter, YouTube CEO Neal Mohan announced that the service had more than 8 million subscribers. MoffettNathanson principal analyst Michael Nathanson has estimated that YouTube TV has approximately 9.4 million paying subscribers.

WATCH: Apple and Google’s multibillion dollar search pact at risk

Apple and Google's multibillion dollar search pact at risk

Continue Reading

Technology

Musk’s xAI sues Apple, OpenAI alleging anticompetitive scheme harmed X, Grok

Published

on

By

Musk’s xAI sues Apple, OpenAI alleging anticompetitive scheme harmed X, Grok

Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, attends the Viva Technology conference at the Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris on June 16, 2023.

Gonzalo Fuentes | Reuters

Elon Musk‘s xAI sued Apple and OpenAI on Monday, accusing the pair of an “anticompetitive scheme” to thwart artificial intelligence rivals.

The lawsuit, filed by Musk’s AI startup xAI and its social network business X, alleges Apple and OpenAI have “colluded” to maintain monopolies in the smartphone and generative AI markets.

Musk’s xAI acquired X in March in an all-stock transaction.

It accuses Apple of deprioritizing so-called “super apps” and generative AI chatbot competitors, such as xAI’s Grok, in its App Store rankings, while favoring OpenAI by integrating its ChatGPT chatbot into Apple products.

“In a desperate bid to protect its smartphone monopoly, Apple has joined forces with the company that most benefits from inhibiting competition and innovation in AI: OpenAI, a monopolist in the market for generative AI chatbots,” according to the complaint, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

An OpenAI spokesperson said in a statement: “This latest filing is consistent with Mr. Musk’s ongoing pattern of harassment.”

Representatives from Apple didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Tesla CEO launched xAI in 2023 in a bid to compete with OpenAI and other leading chatbot makers.

Read more CNBC tech news

Musk earlier this month threatened to sue Apple for “an unequivocal antitrust violation,” saying in a post on X that the company “is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store.”

After Musk threatened to sue Apple, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman responded: “This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn’t like.”

An Apple spokesperson previously said its App Store was designed to be “fair and free of bias,” and that the company features “thousands of apps” using a variety of signals.

Apple last year partnered with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhone, iPad, Mac laptop and desktop products.

Several users replied to Musk’s post on X via its Community Notes feature saying that rival chatbot apps such as DeepSeek and Perplexity were ranked No. 1 on the App Store after Apple and OpenAI announced their partnership.

The lawsuit is the latest twist in an ongoing clash between Musk and Altman. Musk co-founded OpenAI alongside Altman in 2015, before leaving the startup in 2018 due to disagreements over OpenAI’s direction.

Musk sued OpenAI and Altman last year, accusing them of breach of contract by putting commercial interests ahead of its original mission to develop AI “for the benefit of humanity broadly.”

In a counter claim, OpenAI has alleged that Musk and xAI engaged in “harassment” through litigation, attacks on social media and in the press, and through a “sham bid” to buy the ChatGPT-maker for $97.4 billion designed to harm the company’s business relationships.

OpenAI says Musk's filing is 'consistent with his ongoing pattern of harassment

Continue Reading

Technology

Nvidia’s new ‘robot brain’ goes on sale for $3,499 as company targets robotics for growth

Published

on

By

Nvidia's new 'robot brain' goes on sale for ,499 as company targets robotics for growth

Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, is seen on stage next to a small robot during the Viva Technology conference dedicated to innovation and startups at Porte de Versailles exhibition center in Paris, France, on June 11, 2025.

Gonzalo Fuentes | Reuters

Nvidia announced Monday that its latest robotics chip module, the Jetson AGX Thor, is now on sale for $3,499 as a developer kit.

The company calls the chip a “robot brain.” The first kits ship next month, Nvidia said last week, and the chips will allow customers to create robots.

After a company uses the developer kit to prototype their robot, Nvidia will sell Thor T5000 modules that can be installed in production-ready robots. If a company needs more than 1,000 Thor chips, Nvidia will charge $2,999 per module.

CEO Jensen Huang has said robotics is the company’s largest growth opportunity outside of artificial intelligence, which has led to the Nvidia’s overall sales more than tripling in the past two years.

“We do not build robots, we do not build cars, but we enable the whole industry with our infrastructure computers and the associated software,” said Deepu Talla, Nvidia’s vice president of robotics and edge AI, on a call with reporters Friday.

The Jetson Thor chips are based on a Blackwell graphics processor, which is Nvidia’s current generation of technology used in its AI chips, as well as its chips for computer games.

Nvidia said that its Jetson Thor chips are 7.5 times faster than its previous generation. That allows them to run generative AI models, including large language models and visual models that can interpret the world around them, which is essential for humanoid robots, Nvidia said. The Jetson Thor chips are equipped with 128GB of memory, which is essential for big AI models.

Companies including Agility Robotics, Amazon, Meta and Boston Dynamics are using its Jetson chips, Nvidia said. Nvidia has also invested in robotics companies such as Field AI.

However, robotics remains a small business for Nvidia, accounting for about 1% of the company’s total revenue, despite the fact that it has launched several new robot chips since 2014. But it’s growing fast.

Nvidia recently combined its business units to group its automotive and robotics divisions into the same line item. That unit reported $567 million in quarterly sales in May, which represented a 72% increase on an annual basis.

The company said its Jetson Thor chips can be used for self-driving cars as well, especially from Chinese brands. Nvidia calls its car chips Drive AGX, and while they are similar to its robotics chips, they run an operating system called Drive OS that’s been tuned for automotive purposes.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Nvidia's China risks loom large ahead of earnings

Continue Reading

Trending