Now, the jury has returned its verdict and found Tesla partially liable for the crash, and awarded the plaintiffs $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
It amounts to $329 million, slightly less than they requested. However, it’s still a significant blow to Tesla and a major win for those who suffered crashes related to Tesla’s advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS).
Brett Schreiber of Singleton Schreiber, lead attorney for the plaintiffs in this case, commented on the results:
Tesla designed autopilot only for controlled access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans. Tesla’s lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology, putting everyday Americans like Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo in harm’s way. Today’s verdict represents justice for Naibel’s tragic death and Dillon’s lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company’s trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.
The case is particularly impactful because it’s the first wrongful death case involving Tesla’s ADAS systems (Autopilot and Full Self-Driving) to reach trial.
In the case of Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo, Tesla is being found partially liable for having misled customers into thinking Autopilot could do more than it actually could.
George McGee was driving his Model S on Autopilot in Key Largo in April 2019 when he dropped his phone and looked down to pick it up when the car blew past a stop sign at a T intersection, and crashed into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe.
22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo were standing next to the parked Tahoe. Benavides died and Angulo was seriously injured.
The police charged McGee with reckless driving, but the families of the victims sued both McGee and Tesla. McGee settled with the plaintiffs, but Tesla didn’t – leading to this trial.
Tesla attempted to put all the blame on the driver, like it usually do with crashes involving its ADAS system. This strategy has generally worked thanks to Tesla’s warnings about the driver being responsible.
A lawyer for the automaker said in his closing arguments:
Can it happen in any car? Of course it can. Does it happen in any car? Of course it does.
Considering that the driver admitted to not paying attention, one might think that it would be an easy case; however, McGee’s comments led to Tesla’s demise in this case.
The driver said about Autopilot:
My concept was it would assist me should I have a failure or should I miss something, should I make a mistake — that the car would be able to help me. And in that case, I do feel like it failed me.
The lawyers for the plaintiffs used the testimony of the driver, along with numerous statements made by Tesla and its CEO, Elon Musk, to demonstrate how Tesla owners can be misled into believing that Autopilot is more than just a regular driver-assist system.
Electrek’s Take
Now, I’m sure Tesla will appeal and prolong this process as long as possible, but this is still a groundbreaking verdict.
The important aspect to consider here is that the plaintiffs were able to get around Tesla blaming the driver, which is always its main defence against ADAS crashes, and attack directly Tesla’s well-known misleading approach to marketing Autopilot and FSD.
I expect the lawsuits to start pouring in now that this verdict has been released.
It also bodes well for the CA DMV case, which also directly attacks Tesla’s misleading presentation of Autopilot and FSD.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The IRS has updated the terms of the phase-out of the federal tax credit for electric vehicles to give buyers a little more time to secure the $7,500 tax credit.
Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ set a deadline of September 30th to end the $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles and the $4,000 credit for used ones.
It looked clear that buyers needed to take delivery before the end of the day on September 30th in order to get the credit, but the IRS has now updated its website to give some leeway to buyers, dealers, and automakers.
The agency wrote in an update on its website:
Advertisement – scroll for more content
If a taxpayer acquires a vehicle by having a written binding contract in place and a payment made on or before September 30, 2025, then the taxpayer will be entitled to claim the credit when they place the vehicle in service (namely, when they take possession of the vehicle), even if the vehicle is placed in service after September 30, 2025.
If a buyer has a binding order, not a reservation, and has placed a deposit, they can claim the tax credit once they take delivery, even if it’s after September 30th.
Interestingly, the IRS doesn’t mention a time limit after September 30 to secure the tax credit if you have a deposit on a binding contract.
Electrek’s Take
The last time the tax credit was eliminated, there was at least a planned phase-out period. This time, it looked like it was going to be a clean cut, making it difficult for buyers, dealers, and automakers.
This should make things a little easier.
The end of the tax credit has pulled forward a ton of EV demand into Q3 and it will likely exhaust a lot of automakers’ and dealers’ EV inventory.
They are also all rushing to deliver new orders by September 30th, but now it appears that the tax credit money will still be available for those who lock in their orders by the end of the quarter.
Now, this could also open the door to some shenanigans as automakers could try to convert reservations on upcoming electric vehicles that deliver further down the line, but that would be a risky play.
Any buyers getting into those kind of deals should do it at their own risk.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Another German automaker is scaling back EV plans will continue offering hybrid and ICE vehicles. The company claims that it’s still the first German brand to offer a fully electrified lineup.
German automaker Opel drops EV commitment plans
Opel is one of the many brands under the Stellantis Group, alongside Jeep, Ram, Peugeot, Citroën, Fiat, and several others.
Although it was one of the many automakers to commit to offering an all-electric lineup, it’s now backing off its promise.
During Stellantis’ EV Day in 2021, Opel announced its intention to transition to all-electric vehicles by 2028, accompanied by a slate of new models. Former CEO Michael Lohscheller, now chief executive at Polestar, said, “As of 2028, Opel will only offer electric cars in our core market Europe.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
On Monday, the German auto giant abandoned its plans for an all-EV lineup, saying it will continue to focus on its current “multi-energy” strategy.
Opel is the first German auto brand to offer a fully electrified model for every vehicle in its lineup, including electric (EVs), plug-in (PHEVs), and even internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.
Opel Corsa Electric (Source: Stellantis)
In response to media reports claiming it has changed its strategy, the company said in a statement, “This does not have to be limited to 2028 if the demand side requires otherwise.”
Although the company will continue to focus on EVs in specific regions, like the UK, France, and Germany, it will also offer other powertrain options based on demand.
Opel Corsa Electric (Source: Stellantis)
Opel, alongside British sister company Vauxhall, is one of the top-selling brands in Europe. In Germany and the UK, Opel and Vauxhall ranked first in the ever-expanding B-hatch segment through the first half of the year.
The German auto giant becomes the latest brand to scale back EV plans or shift to hybrids, following Volvo, Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, and others.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The electric trike world just got a new heavyweight contender. Puckipuppy’s latest release, the Rottweiler, looks like it was built to haul, climb, and cruise with equal confidence. And with full suspension as well as specs like these, it’s hard not to take notice.
At the heart of the Rottweiler e-trike is a 960W peak motor (750W “nominal”) paired with a torque sensor. That means smooth starts, steady hill climbs, and pedal assistance that feels like it’s working with you instead of for you. Of course, the included throttle allows riders to whip it around without pedaling if they prefer, but the torque sensor will hopefully remind owners that pedaling can be fun and a natural feeling too, especially when you’ve got an extra 960 watts of power helping you out.
The trike tops out at a modest 15 mph (25 km/h), keeping it relatively muted to avoid those high-speed tippy turns that trikes are notorious for. But even with the capped speed, it looks like the Rottweiler has plenty of raw hauling power to keep things fun.
The 48V 15Ah battery has 720 Wh of capacity and the company promises up to 55 miles (88 km) of range on a single charge, depending on how much weight you’re lugging around. And speaking of weight, this thing is no slouch. It’s rated for a payload capacity of 500 pounds (226 kg). That’s more than enough for hauling groceries, pets, or a load of gear down a bike path, all while keeping the SUV parked at home.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Safety and convenience features also find a spot on the spec sheet. Integrated rear turn signals, hydraulic disc brakes, and even a parking brake make it feel more like a small utility vehicle than just an oversized e-bike. The thumb-operated reverse gear is another rare but welcome addition, letting you back out of a tight spot without doing the awkward trike shuffle. It’s rare to find an e-trike with a good (and easily accessible) reverse function, but it makes a big difference when trying to push the trike backwards on anything more than a tiny incline.
Other nice touches include a big 4.7-inch color LCD display, wild-looking butterfly handlebars for multiple riding positions, dual-beam headlights, a cushioned seat with backrest, and fat 20×4” tires that can roll over just about anything. Between those fat tires and the dual suspension setup, the trike should feel pretty darn comfortable over varied terrain.
I’m fearing how much this thing will weigh, if we ever get a chance to put one on a scale, but at least it’s packed to the brim with features!
Priced at $2,399, the Rottweiler is definitely not in the running for lowest-cost trike. There are plenty of others competing on price. This one looks like it’s trying to offer a lot more power, comfort, and features as a way to win over riders.
Electrek’s Take
While Puckipuppy isn’t quite the first dual suspension e-trike like they claim to be, there are still very few options on the market in this category, so it’s welcome news to see another full-suspension option.
The Rottweiler is interesting to me because it isn’t trying to be your fast-and-loose commuter; it’s clearly designed as a heavy-duty hauler for riders who want e-bike utility with a whole lot more stability. The 15 mph limit will feel slow to some, but for families, older riders, or anyone prioritizing cargo over thrills, this makes a lot of sense. With thoughtful design details like reverse, turn signals, and a 500-pound payload, it seems less like a bike and more like a mini pickup truck on three wheels.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.