Connect with us

Published

on

Curbing the power of judges in asylum cases to tackle the migrant hotel crisis is a typical Keir Starmer response to a problem.

The former director of public prosecutions would appear to see overhauling court procedures and the legal process as the answer to any tricky situation.

Yes, the proposed fast-track asylum appeals process is fine as far as it goes. But for a government confronted with a massive migrant crisis, opponents claim it’s mere tinkering.

And welcome and worthy as it is, it isn’t going to “smash the gangs”, stop the boats or act as a powerful deterrent to the people smugglers plying their trade in the Channel.

As protests outside migrant hotels grow noisier and clashes between rival demonstrators become potentially violent, do we hear this cry from the voters: “What do we want? An independent commission of professional adjudicators! When do we want it? As soon as legislative time allows!”

Of course not.

Even those who don’t agree with Nigel Farage’s apparent indifference – in his Times interview this weekend, to asylum seekers sent back to Afghanistan being killed or tortured by the Taliban – are demanding bolder and more radical measures from the government.

More on Asylum

And those who tire of the shadow home secretary Chris Philp’s constant criticisms of the government would probably accept that attempts to stop the boats in the Channel are not just useless but farcical.

On a visit to the Channel earlier this month, Mr Philp said: “There’s a boat full of illegal immigrants crossing right in front of me. The French warship is escorting it and making no attempt at all to stop it.”

Later, assessing his trip, Mr Philp said: “The people-smuggling conveyor belt is now a round trip, paid for by British taxpayers.

“We were in the middle of the Channel, just on the UK side of the border, witnessing the French handing over two boatloads of illegal migrants, Border Force picking them out, providing a taxi service back to the UK.”

So is Border Force fit for purpose? The Sunday Express reports that Martin Hewitt, Labour’s Border Security Commander, is the highest-paid civil servant in the Home Office, with a salary of £200,000, more than the prime minister.

Some top officials have also received bonuses.

Philip Douglas, director general of the Border Force, received bonuses of up to £15,000 in 2024-25 on top of his £140,000-£145,000 salary.

Why, given the force’s lamentable performance?

Given that Border Force clearly cannot cope with the small boat crossings, is it time to bring in the Royal Navy and some gunboat diplomacy, since the French government clearly is not helping to stop the boats?

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

It’s happened before, after all.

In January 2022, former Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced the Royal Navy would take command of counter-migration operations in the Channel to deter migrant crossings and intercept boats before they reached British shores.

It was called Operation Isotrope.

But after squabbling between the Home Office and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the mayor of Calais attacking a “declaration of maritime war”, Rishi Sunak’s government handed control back to the Home Office.

Read more:
Who says what on asylum hotels
Migration stats going in the wrong direction
Labour may have walked into political trap over Epping hotel

Is it time for a rethink? Earlier this month, the Labour peer Lord Glasman, founder of the socially conservative Blue Labour group, urged the PM to use the Navy and drones in the Channel to stop small boat crossings.

In May, however, armed forces minister Luke Pollard slapped down the former Reform UK, now independent, MP Rupert Lowe in the Commons when he asked what assessment had been made of the Navy’s capacity to intercept small boats.

“Defence assets are procured for defence tasks,” Mr Pollard said, dismissively.

The Navy’s primary role, he added, was to safeguard maritime security, including monitoring and shadowing foreign warships in British waters.

But at the very least, the Royal Navy could provide better surveillance, since Border Force seems to be failing in that role, and just the sight of naval vessels in the Channel could be a deterrent.

Sir Keir has put his faith in his “one in, one out” deportation deal with French President Emmanuel Macron and now in his asylum appeals shake-up.

The government’s opponents claim neither will be an effective deterrent, however.

Farage is proposing “mass deportation” of hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers who come to the UK on small boats. Labour says he’s “plucking numbers out of the air”.

But with the PM’s and Labour’s poll numbers tanking as the latest official figures confirm the numbers of migrants and small boat crossings are increasing at a shocking rate, is it now time for a different approach?

Another Starmer U-turn, given the MoD’s hostility to the Navy’s involvement up to now? Gunboats, anyone?

Continue Reading

UK

Russia accuses British government of being ‘provocative’ after spy ship nears UK

Published

on

By

Russian spy ship on edge of UK waters, warns defence secretary

Russia has accused the British government of “provocative statements” and an “escalation of militaristic hysteria” after the defence secretary warned a Kremlin spy ship was nearing the UK.

At a news conference in Downing Street on Wednesday, John Healey said the Yantar was on the edge of British waters north of Scotland, having entered wider UK waters over the last few weeks.

He said it was the second time this year the ship had been deployed off the UK coast and he claimed it was “designed for gathering intelligence and mapping our undersea cables”.

Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: Ministry of Defence
Image:
Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: Ministry of Defence

Politics latest: ‘Budget leaks are not acceptable,’ says Reeves

Mr Healey said the ship had “directed lasers” at pilots of surveillance aircraft monitoring its activities – a Russian action he called “deeply dangerous”.

The defence secretary explained: “We deployed a Royal Navy frigate and RAF planes to monitor and track this vessel’s every move, during which the Yantar directed lasers at our pilots.”

He said his message to Moscow and President Vladimir Putin was “we see you, we know what you’re doing, and if the Yantar travels south this week, we are ready”.

More on Defence

Mr Healey also stated the UK government has “military options ready” if the ship sails closer to British shores.

Russia’s response

Responding to Mr Healey’s comments, the Russian embassy to the UK said on social media it noted his “latest provocative statements” and insisted the ship was an “oceanographic research vessel… in international waters”.

The embassy said the British accusations “raise a smile” and Russia’s actions were “not aimed at undermining” the UK’s security.

It hit out at the UK government’s “Russophobic course and the escalation of militaristic hysteria”, which it warned creates “prerequisites for new dangerous situations”, as it urged London to “refrain from destructive steps”.

Read more:
Analysis: A Bond-villain ship prowling our waters

Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: MoD/PA
Image:
Russian spy ship the Yantar. Pic: MoD/PA

The defence secretary’s remarks come after a report from MPs warned the UK lacks a plan to defend itself from a military attack, despite the government promising to boost readiness with new arms factories.

At least 13 sites across the UK have been identified for new factories to make munitions and military explosives, with Mr Healey expecting the arms industry to break ground at the first plant next year.

The report, by the Commons Defence Committee, said the UK “lacks a plan for defending the homeland and overseas territories” as it urged the government to launch a “co-ordinated effort to communicate with the public on the level of threat we face”.

‘Assertive retaliation’

Now the government has been cautioned it may need to be “more muscular” in standing up to Russia.

The chair of the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy, Matt Western, said Wednesday’s development “demonstrates once again that Russia presents a genuine and immediate threat to the UK’s security”.

He added that “the UK needed to be more muscular in tackling Russian aggression” and “there is more we can do”.

“More assertive retaliation may be required,” he concluded.

Mr Healey acknowledged the dangers facing the UK, saying the country was in a “new era of threat” that “demands a new era for defence”.

Giving more details on the vessel, he said it was “part of a Russian fleet designed to put and hold our undersea infrastructure and those of our allies at risk”.

Read more from Sky News:
Briton who volunteered as spy for Russia jailed

Rail line blast ‘initiated by Russian secret services’

He said the Yantar wasn’t just part of a naval operation but part of a Russian programme driven by Moscow’s Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research, or GUGI, which is “designed to have capabilities which can undertake surveillance in peacetime and sabotage in conflict”.

“That is why we’ve been determined, whenever the Yantar comes into British wider waters, we track it, we deter it and we say to Putin we are ready, and we do that alongside allies,” he added.

Asked by Sky News’ political correspondent Rob Powell whether this was the first time that lasers had been used by a Russian vessel against pilots, Mr Healey replied: “This is the first time we’ve had this action from Yantar directed against the British RAF.

“We take it extremely seriously. I’ve changed the Navy’s rules of engagement so that we can follow more closely, monitor more closely, the activities of the Yantar when it’s in our wider waters. We have military options ready.”

Mr Healey added that the last time the Yantar was in UK waters, the British military surfaced a nuclear-powered attack submarine close to the ship “that they did not know was there”.

Continue Reading

UK

Robert Best death: Women in court after man’s body found in Inverclyde field

Published

on

By

Robert Best death: Women in court after man's body found in Inverclyde field

Two women have appeared in court charged with attempting to defeat the ends of justice after a man was found dead in a field in Inverclyde.

The body of Robert Best, 50, was discovered near High Mathernock Farm, Kilmacolm, on the morning of 11 November.

He had been reported missing from Greenock the same day.

Surrounding fields in the area Robert Best's body was discovered
Image:
Surrounding fields in the area Robert Best’s body was discovered

Dorothy Shields, 64, and Nicola Brisland, also known as Nicola Campbell, 41, were arrested and charged in connection with Mr Best’s death.

The pair appeared before Greenock Sheriff Court on Wednesday, where they made no plea to the charge of attempting to defeat the ends of justice.

The suspects, both of Port Glasgow, were granted bail ahead of their next court appearance, which is yet to be confirmed.

Andrew Brodie, 51, and Stephen Shields, 44, have already appeared in court in connection with the case.

More on Scotland

The pair have each been charged with murder and attempting to defeat the ends of justice.

The suspects, both of Greenock, made no plea to the two separate charges last week and were remanded in custody ahead of their next court appearance.

A 45-year-old man previously arrested in connection with assault and a 41-year-old man arrested at the same time as the two women have both been released pending further enquiries.

Read more from Sky News:
Police probe ‘unexplained’ death of 11-year-old girl
Ex-Met officer guilty of more sexual offences

Police Scotland previously said officers investigating Mr Best’s death were carrying out enquiries into a report of a disturbance in Lansbury Street, Greenock, which took place between 11pm on 10 November and 3am on 11 November.

A force spokesperson said: “Enquiries are ongoing.”

Continue Reading

UK

Illegal mountain of waste next to river ‘utterly appalling’, says PM

Published

on

By

Illegal mountain of waste next to river 'utterly appalling', says PM

Sir Keir Starmer has called the pile of fly-tipped illegal waste next to a river in Oxfordshire “utterly appalling” and said “all available powers” will be used to make those responsible cover the cost of the clean-up.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the pile of rubbish in a field beside the River Cherwell in Kidlington is now 150m long and up to 12m high, adding that water is “now lapping against the waste and carrying it into the river”.

Speaking at PMQs, Sir Ed said it is just one of many sites where organised criminal gangs are “illegally dumping their waste onto our countryside and getting away with it”.

“This is a shocking environmental emergency. So will he instruct the Environment Agency to clean it up now?” Sir Ed added.

Sir Keir responded in the House of Commons on Wednesday, calling the scenes “utterly appalling”.

The prime minister said: “A criminal investigation, as he knows, is under way. Specialist officers are tracking down those responsible.

“The Environmental Agency, in answer to this question, will use all available powers to make sure that the perpetrators cover the cost of the clean-up, which must now follow.”

Pic: Sky News
Image:
Pic: Sky News

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK’s ‘biggest ecological disaster’

Sir Keir added: “We have boosted the Environment Agency’s budget for tackling waste crime by 50%, giving councils new powers to seize and crush fly-tippers, vehicles and lawbreakers can now face up to five years in jail.”

Earlier this week, Calum Miller, Liberal Democrat MP for Bicester and Woodstock, said recent heavy rainfall brought by Storm Claudia at the weekend had made the situation more urgent, and meant the rubbish was slowly floating towards the river, which eventually flows through Oxford and feeds the Thames.

Calum Miller, Liberal Democrat MP for Bicester and Woodstock
Image:
Calum Miller, Liberal Democrat MP for Bicester and Woodstock

Pic: Sky News
Image:
Pic: Sky News

Mr Miller also told Sky News on Sunday it was the first time he had seen anything on this scale, questioning whether the Environmental Agency had the resources to deal with it.

The cost of removing the waste is estimated to be more than the entire annual budget of the local council, which is about £25m.

Read more from Sky News:
Weather warnings for snow and ice updated
What is the mysterious Yantar ‘spy ship’?

With the site on a floodplain, Mr Miller listed what he saw as the three major environmental risks – waste being washed into the waterways, rain seeping through the waste and carrying toxins into the water and the danger of decomposing chemicals presenting a fire risk.

The site is adjacent to the A34, a busy road running through cities including Oxford and Birmingham.

He said the police had used a helicopter with a heat-seeking camera, and could see that some of the waste was beginning to decompose.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Mountain’ of waste dumped

Mr Miller said he believed the Environment Agency was first made aware of the issue back in July.

He said he believed it was the work of “organised criminal gangs” and raised a “bigger systemic problem around the country”, with “dumps are cropping up in more and more places”.

He added: “My concern is the Environmental Agency lacks the resources to deal with criminal activity on this scale. I’m calling on the government to take action and ensure those who are dealing with such incidents have the powers they need to tackle it at source.”

Anna Burns, the Environment Agency’s director for the Thames area, said on Wednesday: “Most of the tipping happened before we were aware of it. As soon as we were aware, we acted quickly and decisively.”

Ms Burns said: “We are pursuing this as a criminal investigation and currently following a number of leads, and we are laser focused on pursing that investigation.

“And we are working with partners to understand the risks associated with the site.”

She said the agency will pursue the perpetrators to make them pay for the “blight on the landscape” they had caused.

Continue Reading

Trending