Connect with us

Published

on

Hyundai wants to sell more vehicles in the US. The South Korean auto giant is investing an additional $5 billion to ramp up production. With billions more on the table, Hyundai will build a new robotics facility while ramping up production of Hyundai and Kia vehicles in the US. Here’s what’s coming next.

How Hyundai’s $26 billion investment will boost US sales

Have you noticed more Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis vehicles on the road lately? Over the past few years, the South Korean automakers have grown significantly in the US.

In the first half of 2025, Hyundai and Kia sold more vehicles than in any first half since entering the US market nearly 40 years ago.

Hyundai has no plans of slowing down after announcing another $5 billion investment on Tuesday, “significantly expanding the Group’s footprint in the US market.” The new funds will be used for several new projects, including a new state-of-the-art robotics facility and steel plant in Louisiana.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The new funding is in addition to the $21 billion investment Hyundai announced just a few months ago, bringing the company’s total to a whopping $26 billion.

Hyundai-IONIQ-5
2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 at a Tesla Supercharger (Source: Hyundai)

Hyundai will use the investment over the next three years (2025 – 2028) to boost production, including Kia and Genesis vehicles.

It’s also building a new robotics innovation hub to design, manufacture, and deploy vehicles. Hyundai expects the advanced new facility will create about 25,000 jobs in the US over the next four years. It will have an annual production capacity of 30,000 units.

Hyundai-IONIQ-9
2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 (Source: Hyundai)

EVs and hybrids are driving growth

The new investment comes after Hyundai and Kia hit a milestone, selling a combined 1.5 million “eco-friendly” vehicles cumulatively in the US this week.

Hyundai’s Tucson Hybrid and the Kia Niro Hybrid are the brand’s top-selling eco-friendly cars. Meanwhile, the all-electric Hyundai IONIQ 5 remains one of the top-selling EVs in the US and is the brand’s fourth most popular eco-friendly vehicle.

Hyundai-Kia-EVs-US
Hyundai and Kia eco-friendly car sales in the US since 2011, including EV, hybrid, PHEV, and FCEV (Source: Hyundai)

With leases starting as low as $159 per month, the 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 is one of the most affordable, efficient EVs on the market. Hyundai has upgraded its best-selling EV with more range (now up to 318 miles), a fresh new style, and a built-in NACS port, allowing you to recharge at Tesla Superchargers.

Hyundai-IONIQ-5-lease
2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 Limited (Source: Hyundai)

Hyundai’s new three-row IONIQ 9 is listed for lease as low as $299 per month, and that’s for a nearly $60,000 SUV.

Both the IONIQ 5 and IONIQ 9 are built at the massive new Hyundai Motor Group Metaplant America (HMGMA) in Georgia. Kia’s EV6 and EV9 are assembled at a separate plant in Georgia.

Looking to check one out for yourself? We can help you find vehicles in your area. You can use our links below to view Hyundai and Kia models near you.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Exxon earnings fall on lower oil prices as OPEC+ raises production

Published

on

By

Exxon earnings fall on lower oil prices as OPEC+ raises production

An Exxon Mobil gas station in Lorton, Virginia, US, on Monday, Oct. 27, 2025.

Luke Johnson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Exxon Mobil on Friday reported third quarter earnings that fell year over year, as oil prices tumbled due in large part to OPEC+ increasing production.

Exxon’s net income fell 12% to $7.55 billion, or $1.76 per share, compared to $8.6 billion, or $1.92 per share, in the year ago period. Excluding one-time items, the oil major posted earnings per share of $1.88.

U.S. crude oil prices have fallen about 16% this year as OPEC+ is increasing production and President Donald Trump’s tariffs have the market worried about an economic slowdown.

Exxon shares were down more than 1% in premarket trading.

Here is what Exxon reported for the third quarter compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

  • Earnings per share: $1.88 adjusted.
  • Revenue: $85.3 billion, vs. $87.7 billion expected

CEO Darren Woods said Exxon posted its highest earnings per share compared to similar quarters when oil prices were falling. Profits also took a hit due to bottom-of-cycle margins in its chemicals business.

However, production in Exxon’s lucrative offshore assets in the South American nation of Guyana hit a quarterly record of more than 700,000 barrels per day. Its assets in the Permian Basin also set a production record of nearly 1.7 million bpd.

Overall, Exxon produced 4.77 million bpd in the quarter.

Exxon’s production business recorded earnings of $5.68 billion, while its refining business posted a profit of $1.8 billion. Its chemicals product business saw earnings of $515 million.

The oil major’s capital expenditures stand at about $21 billion so far this year. It expects spending in 2025 to come in slightly below the lower end of its guidance range of $27 billion to $29 billion.

Exxon gave back $9.4 billion to shareholders in the quarter and raised its fourth-quarter dividend to $1.03 per share.

Continue Reading

Environment

Chevron earnings beat Wall Street estimates as oil production hits record boosted by Hess acquisition

Published

on

By

Chevron earnings beat Wall Street estimates as oil production hits record boosted by Hess acquisition

Signage outside the Chevron Corp. headquarters in Houston, Texas, US, on Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2025.

Mark Felix | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Chevron on Friday reported third-quarter financial results that beat Wall Street estimates, as the company achieved record production due in part to its acquisition of Hess Corporation.

The oil major’s net income declined 21% to $3.54 billion, or $1.82 per share, compared with $4.49 billion, or $2.48 per share, in the same period last year. Its earnings decreased year over year due to falling oil prices and a $235 million loss on transaction costs associated with the Hess acquisition.

Excluding costs associated with Hess and foreign currency impacts, Chevron earned $1.85 per share, beating Wall Street estimates of $1.71 per share.

Here is what Chevron reported for the third quarter compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

  • Earnings per share: $1.85 adjusted vs. $1.71 expected
  • Revenue: $49.73 billion vs. $49.01 billion expected

U.S. crude oil prices have fallen about 16% this year as OPEC+ increases production and President Donald Trump’s tariffs have the market worried about an economic slowdown.

Even with lower prices, Chevron pumped a record 4.1 million barrels per day, a 21% increase compared with the same period last year. Higher production came from the Hess acquisition, the Permian Basin, the Gulf of Mexico and Kazakhstan, according to the company.

Chevron’s U.S. production business posted a profit of $1.28 billion, down 34% compared with $1.95 billion in the third quarter of 2024. It pumped 2 million barrels per day, up 27% from 1.6 million bpd in year-ago period.

International production recorded earnings of $2 billion, down 24% compared with $2.64 billion in the same quarter last year. Production increased 16% to 2 million bpd compared with 1.76 million bpd in the year-ago period.

Profits increased more than 300% to $638 million in Chevron’s downstream U.S. refining business, compared with $146 million in the third quarter of 2024. International refining posted earnings of $499 million, up 11% from $449 million in the year-ago period. Refining profits increased year over year due to higher margins on product sales.

Capital expenditures increased 7% to $4.4 billion over the year-ago quarter due to spending on legacy Hess assets. Chevron’s adjusted free cash flow increased about 50% to $7 billion over the year-ago period.

Continue Reading

Environment

California quietly kills e-bike voucher program, funnels funds into cars instead

Published

on

By

California quietly kills e-bike voucher program, funnels funds into cars instead

California’s ambitious statewide electric bicycle incentive program is officially dead – and it didn’t even get a funeral. After years of buildup, delays, and surging public interest, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has quietly ended the program, rolling the remaining $17 million of the original $30 million budget into its “Clean Cars 4 All” initiative without even making an official announcement.

The California E-Bike Incentive Project was originally hailed as a groundbreaking effort to make electric bikes affordable for low-income residents. Vouchers – not rebates – were designed to let buyers walk into a participating shop and ride out without covering the full price upfront. Base vouchers were worth $1,000, with up to $2,500 available for those purchasing cargo or adaptive e-bikes in priority communities. It was a model that other states were watching closely.

But from the outset, the program was plagued by setbacks. Years of delays meant the first vouchers weren’t distributed until late 2024, and even then, only after a chaotic launch that saw the website crash under the weight of tens of thousands of applicants vying for just 1,500 vouchers. A second launch attempt in April 2025 failed completely, locking out eligible users. While a final distribution round in May went more smoothly, an estimated 90% of eligible applicants were turned away due to limited supply.

To make matters worse, the program’s administrator, Pedal Ahead, came under fire for questionable practices in San Diego, further undermining confidence.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Now, with no formal announcement or update on the program’s official website, CARB has quietly absorbed the funds into its Clean Cars 4 All program.

Electrek’s Take

This is an enormous letdown.

The California E-Bike Incentive Project had the potential to reshape car-heavy communities by giving low-income Californians access to clean, affordable micromobility. Instead, it was starved by mismanagement and then cannibalized to prop up car-centric policy.

It’s not that electric cars don’t deserve support, but this move reflects a broader failure of imagination. If we want a future with fewer cars, not just cleaner ones, then we need to start funding real alternatives. This was a huge missed opportunity to invest in a more livable California.

via: Streetsblog

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending