
Where will your team’s next ballpark be? What Royals can teach us about the future of MLB stadiums
More Videos
Published
1 day agoon
By
admin-
Bradford DoolittleAug 29, 2025, 07:00 AM ET
Close- MLB writer and analyst for ESPN.com
- Former NBA writer and analyst for ESPN.com
- Been with ESPN since 2013
KANSAS CITY — Kauffman Stadium remains a gorgeous place to watch a ballgame.
Sunk into a sea of asphalt in Jackson County, Missouri, some things at The K have changed since it opened in 1973: the name, the color of the seats, the spaces beyond the outfield walls. Essential parts remain: the fountains, the crown-shaped scoreboard, the upsloping green of the hills that give the home of the Kansas City Royals the most pastoral feel of any Major League Baseball venue.
The K is situated in the Truman Sports Complex, next to Arrowhead Stadium, where the NFL’s Kansas City Chiefs have played since 1972. Your feelings about that location might depend on how you view the relationship between baseball and the cities in which it is played. In Kansas City, that relationship might be about to change.
In 2021, so long ago that Bobby Witt Jr. had not yet debuted in the majors, Royals owner John Sherman announced a search for a new venue. The search continues. If all that mattered were the aesthetics of watching a game, or the drive-and-park convenience, the Royals would stay put. But in 2025, that’s not enough.
“We’re after more than a ballpark,” said R. Brooks Sherman Jr., the Royals’ president of business operations (no relation to John Sherman).
The aspirational model these days is the Truist Park/Battery project in Cobb County, Georgia. Teams want the ballpark and the additional revenue streams of an adjacent village.
That requires land, but if just any land would do, the Royals would not be looking elsewhere. The area around Kauffman Stadium, 7.8 miles from downtown Kansas City, has never developed. Location matters. While the Royals haven’t declared where they want to go, they have been clear about what they want.
“The Battery is the best example in our minds,” Brooks Sherman said. “But you look around the league and you’ve seen all these [examples]. San Diego, what it did for the Gaslamp [Quarter)] there. Washington, D.C., Colorado are great. We want to be additive to wherever we go. We want the live, work and play environment.”
The live, work and play dynamic. Those other venues have that but in different settings, from the urban core (San Diego, Denver) to a rehabilitated blue-collar district (Washington) to the suburbs (Atlanta).
These are contexts the Royals are sifting through now, making them a test case for ballpark development trends. If The Battery is the model, just where should that model be turned into reality elsewhere?
In “Ballpark: Baseball in the American City,” author and architecture critic Paul Goldberger wrote that a ballpark, “evokes the tension between the rural and the urban that has existed throughout American history.”
That tension has played out through the different eras of ballparks in the game’s history. It’s playing out now in Kansas City. How might this drama be resolved here, and what might that mean when other MLB teams look to the future?
Here are three Battery-inspired models the Royals are considering, and how they currently work — or could work — for your favorite team.
Model 1: The suburbs
Royals’ option: 119th and Nall, Johnson County, Kansas
Sherman’s announcement about a stadium search reeled off an urban-centric wish list. But the Braves’ project throws a monkey wrench into any assumptions about what that means. For the first time in a long time, a baseball team moved away from the city and not toward it. The Braves wanted the full live, work and play effect dynamic of a city, so they built their own.
This puts nether regions such as 119th Street and Nall Avenue in play. The Johnson County site once housed the campus of the Sprint World Headquarters. According to WalkScore.com, the area has a transit score of zero.
A few months ago, an affiliate of the Royals acquired the mortgage of the property, though it has yet to assume ownership. The team is giving itself options.
The 119th and Nall location is about 19 miles from Kansas City’s city hall and sits 37 miles from Kansas City International Airport. To get there, you drive. If this arrangement becomes the new standard, that’s a lot of driving. Kansas City, not just the suburbs, has been car dominant for decades, far from a unique story among baseball’s markets. Every city wants transit, and to varying degrees has acquired it, but in most cities cars remain king.
“We don’t have the greatest public transit, so we have to make it easy,” Brooks Sherman said. “It’s a driving environment. We have to make it easy for folks to get in and out. But we also think that the come-early, stay-late aspect of this, with a development that surrounds the ballpark, will be helpful for that.”
According to our urban-centric location metric (see accompanying chart), Kauffman Stadium ranks 29th among current venues (and last in walk score). Moving to this even-more-distant location would drop the Royals into last place. They might stay there forever, unless the vagabond Athletics decide to move into the middle of the Nevada desert.
When teams choose a site, they are projecting. One projection is what cities and their surrounding communities will become in the future. Another is how people will choose to get around, and what will fuel their ventures. Options are good. Multimodal transit is the ideal. You also need people to want to go there — and not just for baseball. A key part of the Battery’s success, and what other markets want to replicate, has little to do with the revenue from game days.
“It’s not the 81 days you’re playing baseball, it’s the 284 days you’re not playing baseball,” said architect Lamar Wakefield of Nelson Worldwide, whose design credits include The Battery and who is working on the reimagining of the area near Citizens Bank Park in South Philadelphia. “We know how to do that. We’re place makers. Everyone wants to reach as many in their fan base as they can.”
Any team thinking of making a move to the suburbs for its own Battery has to take a careful look at what is different about its market from Atlanta, which in some studies has been measured as the most sprawled-out large metro area in the country. Atlanta also has a metro-area population nearly three times that of the Kansas City region. The dynamics are not necessarily transferable.
Ballparks take on the characteristics of the area around them and serve as icons of their cities. A lack of aesthetic association with the city of Atlanta is, along with the absence of transit, one of the chief nitpicks with the Braves’ project. You feel it when you visit from elsewhere. If you stay on site, you feel as if you were never in Atlanta. This is why Goldberger coined a word to describe the Truist/Battery project: “Urbanoid.”
Nevertheless, if the Royals follow the Braves’ example and flourish, baseball’s owners might not worry about any of that. They will worry about finding the space to create a live-work-and-play baseball Shangri-la of their own.
Teams this model currently works for: Braves, Rangers
Whether or not you think the Braves should have left the Summerhill neighborhood — which has boomed since the team left — there’s no questioning whether the Truist/Battery project has succeeded, during the baseball season and outside of it.
The Rangers’ suburban locale makes more sense than in any other MLB market. The downtowns of Dallas and Fort Worth are both growing, but they are about 33 miles away from each other. The power brokers in Arlington have talked about urbanizing the area around Globe Life Field, but it’s awfully low density. Still, this location makes the most sense for the most people in one of the country’s most entropic, car-centric regions.
Teams this model could work for: Angels
The Angels have been in the same location for nearly six decades and have been working to redevelop the site for years. They recently extended their lease at Angel Stadium through 2032 and surely hope to have a Battery-like dynamic in the works by then. Baseball has worked well in Anaheim for the most part, and there’s no reason to think that won’t continue in a future iteration.
Other than this subset of teams, it’s hard to see the suburban option as preferable for any other market, including Kansas City.
Model 2: In the city, but not downtown
Royals’ option: North Kansas City
When we think about baseball’s classic venues — Fenway Park, Wrigley Field, Ebbets Field, Forbes Field, Tiger Stadium, Crosley Field, Shibe Park, Polo Grounds and others — they have been neighborhood parks.
This model fell from favor as American cities became increasingly surrounded by suburban sprawl and cars became the dominant mode of transit. Fenway and Wrigley were the only classic parks spared the eventual wrecking ball, and many still mourn the loss of the others.
North Kansas City, where the Royals have reportedly submitted a term sheet that outlines their needs, would be a throwback to the neighborhood park era.
The potential site is 3.6 miles from Kansas City’s city hall but it’s in Clay County, not Jackson County. The site’s renderings spotlight the downtown skyline a few miles to the south. Sports architects are urbanist by nature, so you often see that kind of setting in their imaginings. Each type of site suggests something unique.
“They’ll all be different because a lot of it’s just the demands of the client,” said Earl Santee, the legendary architect from Populous, whose résumé reads almost like a register of baseball’s highest-profile stadium projects. His next stadium project will be No. 20. “My job is for them to pick a site and then I’ll give them the best possible project.”
The Clay County rendering depicts a version of North Kansas City that isn’t currently there. It’s a blue-collar neighborhood with a population of less than 5,000, per the 2020 census. There isn’t as much industry as there used to be, so there is a lot of post-industrial property ripe for development to the south, toward downtown. Enter the Royals.
The town itself is charming in an almost classic Main Street sort of way, even though it is nestled into an urban location only a few miles from downtown. The streets are dominated by independent businesses, one of which is the Kansas City institution that is Chappell’s Restaurant & Sports Museum, where you see, among other relics, one of the Oakland Athletics’ championship trophies, a gift to restaurant founder Jim Chappell from eccentric A’s owner Charlie Finley.
Chappell’s would probably benefit by getting the Royals as a neighbor, but, then again, the Royals would be opening venues of their own. That kind of omnipresence is both the blessing and the bane of having a 21st-century baseball team as a neighbor.
“It’s 81 days and hopefully two and a half million fans,” Brooks Sherman said, regarding the transformational potential for the park development, wherever it goes. “Why not show them the best that you have and build around it and make it this vibrant environment? Be additive to the community all year long.”
A positive example of this is Nationals Park and the blocks around it, which rehabilitated a neglected area. This would have been a virtue of the ill-fated Howard Terminal proposal that once seemed the destiny of the then-Oakland Athletics.
“Some of the proposals that they were working on for the Howard Terminal waterfront site in Oakland were actually pretty good,” Goldberger said. “The idea of combining a ballpark with the larger transformation of an urban neighborhood that would be transformed anyway over time is actually a really good one.”
The North Kansas City site is not much to see now, just empty parcels and massive surface parking lots. There are potential issues in the need for significant infrastructure upgrades and more transit options. The basic reality is that the Royals’ arrival would transform the character of the area.
Baseball can certainly work in post-industrial neighborhoods like this, but the citizens there have to be on board. The Royals might decide they want North Kansas City, but the people there must want them back.
Teams this model currently works for: Brewers, Cubs, Dodgers, Giants, Mets, Nationals, Phillies, Red Sox, Yankees
These are all pretty self-evident successes. The South Philly location of Citizens Bank Park puts the Phillies in this class, and given the development underway around their venue and those of the city’s other major sports teams, they’ve only scratched the potential of the site.
American Family Field in Milwaukee merits special mention. It’s more suburban than urban in design, with plenty of surface parking to accommodate the renowned tailgating culture of Wisconsin sports fans. But it’s not that far from downtown. The Brewers probably could develop some of the parking area and beyond, but it has worked for them pretty well as it is, ballpark village or not.
Teams this model could work for: Athletics, Diamondbacks, Marlins, Rays, White Sox
The now-abandoned Battery-style Rays proposal in St. Petersburg would have fit this model, though the market is forever going to be a geographic puzzle since the two largest municipalities (Tampa and St. Pete) are connected by a long bridge.
At present, it’s hard to understand what the White Sox’s plan for a post-Rate Field future might be. The White Sox could have seized upon the chance to anchor The 78 development alongside the Chicago River, though for now that ship seems to have sailed. A ballpark on that property would have tied them with Toronto atop the urbanity ratings by our urban score method.
Miami’s LoanDepot Park is a fascinating stadium that hulks over Little Havana and doesn’t connect that well with the largely residential surrounding area. The transit scores for the venue are disappointingly low given the relative density of Miami.
Model 3: Downtown
Royals’ option: Washington Square Park
From the start, John Sherman cited “downtown baseball” as a possible outcome of the Royals’ stadium search. He told reporters, “Wherever we play, the process will result in meaningful community impact that’s real and measurable and result in economic growth and economic activity that benefits this region. The other criteria is that we have a positive impact on the quality of life for the citizens in Kansas City, with a particular focus on those underrepresented parts of our community.”
While the challenges of the Royals’ quest have kept pretty much every vacant lot in the Kansas City metro area in play, Sherman’s initial thoughts express an urbanist perspective. This is nothing new. Baseball and urbanism — or the rejection of it — have always gone hand in hand.
“All roads lead to downtown,” said Quinton Lucas, mayor of Kansas City, who advocates for a downtown venue. “And frankly, they’re all roads that can get you out of downtown efficiently after a game.”
Presumably, the Royals still have multiple possible downtown locations under consideration, but lately the buzz has been around Washington Square Park. From an urbanist’s perspective, it’s the full package.
Kansas City’s downtown remains a work in progress, but it is in a far better place than it was at the beginning of this century. The population in the city’s core has more than doubled during that time (estimates currently range in the 32,000 to 40,000 range) and is now larger than those of the downtowns of other MLB markets in more heavily populated metropolitan regions, including Atlanta. And there is plenty of room left to grow.
Washington Square Park sits on the southern edge of the Crossroads Arts District, across the street from the Crown Center to the south and Union Station to the west. Main Street would run along the west edge of the park and features an expanding streetcar line. Amtrak rolls into and out of Union Station across the street. It’s likely that a move to the Crossroads would eventually put the Royals in the upper third of urban-centric parks.
This is an alluring vision and a possible blueprint for other markets because it imagines stitching a ballpark and the traits of a Battery-esque development into the spine of the city.
“We want the place to be active 365 days a year because we want the retail and the food and beverage to be successful year-round, not just when we’re in town,” Brooks Sherman said. “The way you do that is the density.”
Crossroads advocates have gone to great lengths to make the case that there is ample parking near the site, and that’s important. Still, the nature of the mixed-use baseball development should inherently ease parking concerns. With things to do around the ballpark, people come and go at different times, and anyone for whom transit is a better option than driving will use transit. This would not be an option in the suburbs in most markets, and certainly not in the Kansas City region as things currently stand.
“If you are trying to plant your flag as the center of culture, conversation and discussion in a community — as well as revenue, by the way — then you go to the densest areas that have all of it,” Lucas said. “I think that is downtown Kansas City, like it is a central business district corridor or at least the central cultural corridor of any American city.”
The footprint of the potential ballpark works well enough, but the site is constrained by the constraints of the street grid. Analysis done by Washington Square Park proponents shows the site is as big as or bigger than the footprint of several current venues, but a Crossroads-located park might feature a fairly short porch to right field. That might be fun for Vinnie Pasquantino.
The Royals are targeting a somewhat smaller capacity than The K, around 34,000, and a potential venue here could have much of the intimacy of the classic parks — including rooftop views from adjacent buildings. The site represents a design challenge, but Kansas City — as the world’s sports architecture mecca — has a home-field advantage in that regard. The outcome could be dazzling.
“It fits like a catcher’s mitt,” said architect Steve McDowell, principal at BNIM, who put together the renderings for the Washington Square Park site. “You can just kind of drop it in there so gently, which gives fantastic views downtown, to the north and all around, really.”
Teams like the Royals want their park to accelerate the progress of an improving downtown, not become a bubble within it, which is what has arguably happened in places such as St. Louis.
“While it might be a uniquely designed footprint, that also might give it a sense of character, like it’s been here forever,” said Brett Posten, co-founder of Highline Partners, a Crossroads-based strategic branding consultancy. Posten co-created the Washington Square Park website and has worked to catalyze community support around the effort. “Fenway is weird, and it’s great. There’s just cool stuff that happens in weird baseball, so we have the opportunity to create something with a little bit of character.”
This approach, if the Royals seek it, could become the next aspirational model in ballpark projects. It’s The Battery but in a city, not the imitation of one. Much of this takes some imagination, but whoever got anywhere without a little of that?
“There are a few goals to any stadium project,” Lucas said. “I think they are all met downtown. I’m not sure they’re met in all other locations. One is to be able to get site control of an area that allows live, work and play opportunities. You absolutely have that.”
Teams this model currently works for: Astros, Blue Jays, Cardinals, Diamondbacks, Mariners, Orioles, Padres, Pirates, Reds, Rockies, Tigers, Twins
It’s hard to argue that any of these downtown venues — all less than 2 miles from their respective city halls — have been disappointments. Not all have the full Battery-like dynamic going on just yet, but all of them could iterate in that direction over time. That’s been the stated goal of Orioles owner David Rubenstein, to generate development around Oriole Park at Camden Yards, the venue that kicked off the back-to-downtown phase of ballpark construction.
Teams this model could work for: Brewers, Rays, White Sox
The White Sox should still try to get involved with The 78, where MLS’ Chicago Fire are planning to build. In this case, soccer is leading the way, not baseball.
For now, in Kansas City, the ball is in the Royals’ court.
“People are [excited], and they want to help,” Brooks Sherman said. “And we said, ‘We’re getting there, and we’re going to need your help when we get to the right spot.’ We’re working hard, and we’ll get there in the right way.”
You may like
Sports
‘Appreciate you, Coach’: Lee Corso’s impact felt far beyond ‘GameDay’ audience
Published
3 hours agoon
August 30, 2025By
admin
-
Ryan McGeeAug 28, 2025, 07:00 AM ET
Close- Senior writer for ESPN The Magazine and ESPN.com
- 2-time Sports Emmy winner
- 2010, 2014 NMPA Writer of the Year
“Appreciate you, young man.”
With all due respect to “Not so fast, my friend,” those aren’t the words that first come to my mind when I think of Lee Corso, who will be making his final “College GameDay” appearance Saturday at Ohio State. Instead, it’s that first sentence. Because those are the first words I ever heard from Coach. Well, the first I heard in person.
By the time he said that to me, on Saturday, Oct. 1, 1994, I had already heard him say so many words, but always through a television speaker. I had been watching him on ESPN for seven years. When “College GameDay” debuted Sept. 5, 1987, I was a high school student living in a college-football-crazed house in Greenville, South Carolina. My father was an ACC football official, and my role at the house was to get up Saturday mornings and make sure the VCR was rolling on Dad’s game that day so he could break down the film when we got home from church on Sunday.
Then, what to my wondering eyes did appear but a new ESPN studio show, previewing all of the day’s college football games, including wherever Pops might be with his whistle. It was called “College GameDay,” and that night in the same studio, the crew was back with highlights of all those games. It was hosted by Tim Brando, whom we knew from “SportsCenter,” with analysis provided by human college football computer Beano Cook and … wait … was that the guy who used to coach at Indiana? The last time we saw him, wasn’t he coaching the Orlando Renegades to a 5-13 record during the dying days of the USFL?
Brando tells the story of Corso’s ESPN audition, how the then-52-year-old looked at his would-be broadcast partner and said, “Sweetheart, I’m here for the duration. This show is going to be the trigger for your career and my career. I’m going to be the Dick Vitale of college football. Football doesn’t have one. And this show is going to be my vehicle.”
That vehicle shifted into drive and stayed there, even as “College GameDay” remained parked in Bristol, Connecticut. Eventually, Brando moved on and wunderkind Chris Fowler took over as host. They were joined by former running back Craig James, who was nicknamed the “Pony Patriot” because of his college tenure at SMU and his NFL stint in New England. But that’s not what Coach called him. He addressed James as “Mustang Breath.”
That was the formative years “GameDay” lineup I consumed so hungrily during my college days in Knoxville, Tennessee. My roommates and I rose groggily on Saturday mornings to see whether Corso picked our Vols to win that day before stumbling out the dorm doors to grab a cheeseburger and head to the Neyland Stadium student section. If he said Tennessee was going to win, we declared him a genius. If he said the Vols were going to lose, we would scream, “What the hell do you know?! You only lasted one year at Northern Illinois!” That night, pizza in hand, we would watch him on the scoreboard show and again shout at the television. It was either “Spot on, Coach!” or “Hey, Coach, not so fast, my friend!”
Those were the autumns of the early 1990s. Just as Coach had predicted, “College GameDay” had indeed been a trigger. And he indeed was becoming the face of the sport he loved so much. At home, we could feel that love because we recognized it. We loved college football, too. Whether Corso picked your team or not, his passion for the sport was indisputable. That created a connection. Like seeing the same friends every Saturday, the ones whose season tickets have always been next to yours. Or the tailgater who has always parked in the spot next to you, offering up a beer and a rack of ribs. Or the guy you happen to meet as you are both bellied up to a sports bar on Saturday to watch college football games. All of them.
In a business full of phony, Lee Corso has always been the genuine article. And in a world full of awful, Lee Corso has always been fun. All at once so irresistibly relatable but also larger than life.
So, now, imagine my through-the-looking-glass moment of that first time I heard him speak to me directly. That October Saturday in 1994. I was an entry-level ESPN production assistant, barely one year out from those dorm days at Tennessee. I was also barely five years from bowls of cereal back in our Greenville family room, labeling a VHS tape for my father while watching Corso break down what he thought might happen in Dad’s game.
“Appreciate you, young man.”
My assignment that day was to cut and script a highlight of my alma mater as the Vols hosted No. 19 Washington State. The headliner play was a long touchdown run by wideout Nilo Silvan on a reverse pitch from some kid named Peyton Manning. But the quiet play that really handed the Vols the upset was a fourth-down conversion early in the fourth quarter, when a 1-yard Manning run earned the first down by barely an inch, all while still in Tennessee territory. That set up a field goal that ended up sealing the 10-9 win.
Back then, every ESPN highlight was produced in a converted basement room crammed with tape machines and filled with the noise of 20-somethings like me, scrambling in and out of the edit rooms that lined what we called “screening.” When you were done piecing together your one-minute tape and scribbling out a handwritten script, you ran out of that edit room and down the hallway to the tape room and TV studio to deliver it all.
As we were about to pop my Tennessee-Wazzu tape for the delivery dash, the door to our edit suite opened. It was Lee Corso. Without us knowing it, he had been watching through the window to see what plays we had included in our highlight. Without saying a word, he pointed at my script — called a “shot sheet” — and motioned for me to hand it to him. He read it, flipped it around so it was facing me and used his finger to tap the box describing that decidedly nonsexy fourth-quarter fourth-down conversion.
“Appreciate you, young man.”
Then he continued.
“I came down here to make sure you had this play in there. That was the play of the game. If we hadn’t had that play in this highlight for me to talk about, then I would have looked like a dummy. And I don’t need any help in that department, do I?”
He squeezed the shoulders of my editor, the guy at the wheel of the machinery.
“I appreciate you, too.”
Then he walked out into the furious racket of screening and shouted through the aroma cloud of sweat and pizza, “How we doing, troops!”
Someone shouted back, “How was Nebraska, Coach?” A reminder that this was the first year that “College GameDay” had hit the road. They went out once in 1993, to Notre Dame, as a test. It went well, so they were headed out six times in 1994. Just two weeks earlier, they had gone to Lincoln, the show’s third-ever road trip.
He replied: “Lot of corn and big corn-fed dudes!”
Another shout: “You excited about going to Florida State-Miami next week, Coach?”
“Let’s hope it goes better than when I played there!” A reminder that the Florida State defensive back they called the “Sunshine Scooter,” who held the FSU record for career interceptions (14) for decades, was a career 0-2 against the Hurricanes in Miami.
Before Coach scooted back down the hall to the studio, he said it again. This time to the entire room of kids desperately trying to find their way in the TV sports business.
“I appreciate y’all!”
That was more than three decades ago. And whenever I recall that story, it is echoed back to me by every single person who was in that screening room with me back in the day. And the people who first went out on the road with “College GameDay” in the mid-1990s. And the people who are out there with the show today.
In so many cases, it’s the same people. Jim Gaiero, the current producer of “GameDay,” was also down in screening back in the day. The group that produced the incredible “Not So Fast, My Friend” ESPN documentary was led by a handful of Emmy Award-winning feature producers who also were down in the pit, and also were recipients of so many “appreciate you”s.
It is impossible to measure the impact of someone like Corso, the face of his sport, taking those moments to encourage, to mentor, and to, yes, coach. That’s not common. But neither is he.
On the morning of the 2024 Rose Bowl, the College Football Playoff semifinal between Alabama and Michigan, I was sitting with Coach just before he headed out to the “GameDay” set. I shared with him that story from 1994 and told him how much it had always meant to me. He replied: “Winning games is great. But any real coach will tell you that isn’t the best part of the job. It’s watching those that you coached up as kids, seeing them grow into adults, have great jobs and raise great families. That’s why you do it.”
Lee Corso spends every Saturday surrounded by those he has coached. And that’s why it has been and will be so hard to say goodbye. It’s why there was never an icicle’s chance in Phoenix that Corso was going to be off the show after he suffered a stroke. It’s why he was still part of the show in 2020, when COVID-19 had him stuck at home in Florida as the rest of the crew was back on the road. It’s why he has been on the show ever since it was born, even as it has grown from a few guys in a studio to a few dozen fans behind the stage on the road to the rock concert circus caravan that it is today. Exactly what Coach believed it could be when he showed up for that first audition 38 years ago.
Love. That’s why.
You see it in the eyes of those who work on the show. The way they look out for him. The way they still hang on every word he says. We all see it very publicly when we watch Kirk Herbstreit. It’s hard to remember when we see the current Herbie, the father-of-four statesman of the sport, but when he first joined “College GameDay” in 1996, he had just turned 27, less than four years out of Ohio State. When Kirk posts those early Saturday morning videos of Coach sharing a story or Coach pulling a prank or Coach cracking himself up as he tries to figure out how to navigate an overly complicated escalator, we all feel that. Just as we have felt that since the first countdown to the first “College GameDay” on Sept. 5, 1987.
Not so fast? It has gone by too fast. But what a friend.
Appreciate you, Coach.
Sports
Deion healthy in return, says Buffs ‘fine’ after loss
Published
11 hours agoon
August 30, 2025By
admin
-
Adam RittenbergAug 30, 2025, 01:25 AM ET
Close- College football reporter; joined ESPN in 2008. Graduate of Northwestern University.
BOULDER, Colo. — Deion Sanders ran onto the field with his Colorado team Friday night, just months removed from having surgery to replace and reconstruct his bladder after a tumor was found this spring.
Sanders, 58, jogged past a portable toilet placed next to Colorado’s bench area for him to use during the game, which was sponsored by Depend, the adult incontinence undergarment company. He slowed near the South end zone and gently tapped his players who were kneeling in prayer.
After the most serious health issue in a series of them the past five years, Sanders said he “felt good,” adding, “I don’t feel good right now, but I felt darn good during the game.”
Sanders was miffed that his team didn’t capitalize on early takeaways, convert several big-play opportunities on offense or make nearly enough run stops against Georgia Tech, falling 27-20 in the season opener at Folsom Field.
Sanders coached his first game for Colorado since undergoing surgery in May. He was away from the team for much of late spring and early summer before rejoining the squad for preseason camp. Dr. Janet Kukreja, director of urological oncology at the University of Colorado Cancer Center, said in a news conference in July that Sanders is cured of cancer.
Upon returning, Sanders focused on getting his third Colorado team, and the first without his sons Shedeur and Shilo and 2024 Heisman Trophy winner Travis Hunter, to employ a different play style, based on being more physical at the line of scrimmage. Colorado made some strides Friday, as a rushing offense that had been last in the FBS during Sanders’ tenure generated 146 yards on 31 attempts.
But Colorado allowed 320 rushing yards and three touchdowns to Georgia Tech, including the tiebreaking, game-winning 45-yard dash by quarterback Haynes King with 1:07 left.
“Defensively, no, there’s no way you can say you’re physical when you got your butt kicked like that,” Sanders said. “But offensively, you probably were sitting out there saying, ‘Dang, they should keep running the ball’ because you saw the physicality we’ve been talking about.”
Although Georgia Tech committed turnovers on its first three possessions — becoming the first team to do so in a season opener since Florida International in 2010 — and didn’t reach the end zone until late in the first half, Sanders said, “It’s hard to applaud the defense right now.”
After the three early turnovers, Georgia Tech had three drives of 75 yards or more and a 61-yarder in the closing minutes. Colorado linebacker Reginald Hughes said Georgia Tech’s gap scheme “messed with our eyes a little bit” and caused the Buffaloes not to properly fill several holes in the run game.
“We’re at a good pace, inclining to be the defense that we want,” Hughes said. “We’re not quite there yet. It’s really more so execution with us. We play fast, we get after it. It’s just executing situations. Stuff like that, it shows up later in the game.”
Quarterback Kaidon Salter, a transfer from Liberty making his first start for Colorado and replacing the record-setting Shedeur Sanders, had an early passing touchdown and finished with 159 passing yards and 43 rushing yards on 13 attempts. Deion Sanders noted that Salter could have run even more and been more of a true dual threat.
“Most definitely, I feel like I had those opportunities,” Salter said, “but me being a dual-threat quarterback, keeping my eyes down the field, I felt like I had chances to throw the ball downfield and make some plays.”
Despite Colorado’s significant personnel losses at quarterback and wide receiver, Sanders said the offense doesn’t need time to come together, adding, “We’ve got to go get it and do it right now.”
He said he saw enough good things overall to still expect a strong season.
“We’re definitely going to be fine, I’m not concerned about that,” Sanders said. “We could have won that game. It’s not like we got our butts kicked. They ran the heck out of the ball, they did that, but we had opportunities.”
Sports
‘Split’ title 35 years ago? Don’t tell Colorado and Georgia Tech that
Published
20 hours agoon
August 29, 2025By
admin
-
Andrea AdelsonAug 29, 2025, 07:30 AM ET
Close- ACC reporter.
- Joined ESPN.com in 2010.
- Graduate of the University of Florida.
CHAD BROWN AND his Colorado teammates have gold rings. On each of them is a big number “1” filled with diamonds meant to commemorate their 1990 national title and the year they spent as the best team in the nation.
Across the country, Ken Swilling and his Georgia Tech teammates have their own gold rings, also with diamonds filling a big “1,” also meant to commemorate their 1990 national title.
Though their rings are nearly identical, members of those Colorado and Georgia Tech teams refuse to acknowledge that their seasons have a shared outcome. Players still won’t use the words “split” or “shared” when it comes to the 1990 season. Colorado points to its superior strength of schedule as the reason it is the rightful champ after going 11-1-1 and finishing No. 1 in the AP poll. Georgia Tech points to its unbeaten season as proof that it is the rightful champ after going 11-0-1 and finishing No. 1 in the coaches’ poll by one vote. Thirty-five years later, trash talk dies hard for two schools that played in the pre-BCS era and had no way to settle things on the field.
“Oh no. I would never say it was a split national championship,” Swilling said. “They can call us split, co- whatever they want to call it, but as far as Georgia Tech is concerned, we won the national championship in 1990. Heck, it took them five downs against Missouri to get the split anyway.”
“We were the best team in the nation. I have no doubts about that,” Brown says. “So people’s opinion about the Fifth-Down Game and people’s opinion about who should have won a national championship, it lands so poorly on me I don’t think about it. When someone says, ‘You won a national championship at Colorado?’ I say, ‘Yes, I did.’ ‘You don’t say you won a split national championship?’ No. Never once have I ever said I won a split national championship.”
Perhaps old scores will be settled when 1990 co- … er … national champs Colorado and Georgia Tech kick off the season in Boulder (8 p.m., ESPN), in the first meeting between the schools.
On second thought, maybe not.
IN 1989, COLORADO went undefeated in the regular season and faced Notre Dame in the Orange Bowl with the national title on the line. It lost 21-6, but their failure fueled their offseason workouts.
That, plus the memory of teammate Sal Aunese, who died of stomach cancer in 1989, drove Colorado as it headed into the 1990 season. But the first three games of the campaign did not go the way the Buffs had expected. Colorado was a surprising 1-1-1 headed into a game at Texas, having tied the season opener against No. 8 Tennessee and lost in Week 3 at No. 21 Illinois. No margin of error remained. Coach Bill McCartney had the team meet at a hotel where it usually stayed before home games. Players thought they would board buses for the airport.
Instead, McCartney called a meeting. He proceeded to lay into the entire team, calling players out by name for not playing up to their potential.
“Coach Mac usually did not make things personal,” Brown said. “This time, it was personal. He worked his way around the room, and I was the last one he got to. He turned to me and he said, ‘Chad, you’ve hurt me the most.’ He questioned my football character. For a guy who always prided himself on the way he played, that hurt.”
Brown dove into his playbook on the flight, and before leaving for the game, stared at himself in the mirror. He said to himself, “No one will ever question my football character again.”
Colorado trailed Texas 22-14 early in the fourth quarter, when running back Eric Bieniemy went into the defensive huddle and told his teammates, “Get us the ball back. We’re going to score. We’re going to win this game.”
Sure enough, Bieniemy scored a 4-yard touchdown with more than 10 minutes left to play, then ran it in from 2 yards out with 5:47 left for the winning touchdown. Brown finished with 20 tackles. Colorado players and coaches point to that game — and the speech McCartney gave his team — as the turning point in the season.
“Everybody likes to talk about the Texas turnaround, saying that I came out there and saved the game,” Bieniemy said. “No, it wasn’t anything special because there were times throughout the course of the year they had to uplift me as well.'”
Colorado dropped from its preseason position at No. 5 to No. 20, but by October, the Buffs were back to No. 12 in the AP poll. They’d still need some help to get back into the national championship race.
Players probably wouldn’t have guessed they’d need that help in Week 6 against unranked Missouri.
Before we discuss the infamous Fifth-Down Game, here’s what the Colorado players want you to know: Missouri tried to sabotage them from the start. In 1990, Missouri played on AstroTurf packed with sand. Colorado players said the school should have watered down the field before use.
That did not happen, so as play began, Colorado kept slipping and sliding all over the turf, slowing down its option game. (The Tigers, on the other hand, were familiar with the surface and knew which cleats to wear to minimize slipping.) Missouri led 31-27 with two minutes left in the fourth quarter. Then Colorado, behind backup quarterback Charles Johnson and Bieniemy, started driving. On first-and-goal from the 3-yard line with 28 seconds left, Johnson spiked the ball.
On second down, Bieniemy ran for a gain of 2 down to the 1-yard line. Colorado called timeout. The person working the down marker never changed the down. Colorado center Jay Leeuwenburg noticed and told McCartney, who insisted it was still second down. Meanwhile, a fan sitting behind the Colorado bench had a heart attack and was moved down to field level for medical attention, causing further distraction.
Colorado ran three more plays — and scored on its fifth down — as Johnson crossed over the goal line. The Missouri crowd chanted “fifth down,” and when the game ended, started throwing bottles and other objects onto the field. Starting quarterback Darian Hagan, who missed the game with an injury, said he took off his rib cage brace to shield quarterbacks coach Gary Barnett from getting hit.
“A lot of people say that we cheated and we should have given the game back and all this stuff,” Hagan said. “My response to that is, ‘Why did we cheat and what were Missouri’s coaches doing? Why didn’t they know what down it was? Everybody was out of it. The referees didn’t know. So they can blame a lot of people, but at the same time, we got a national championship out of it.
“It was human error. It wasn’t like we were trying to try to pull a fast one on anyone.”
Bieniemy said he legitimately had no idea that Colorado had used five downs until he saw highlights on ESPN. But he had to hear about the game constantly later in his career, when he became an assistant coach and worked 10 years for the Kansas City Chiefs and Andy Reid, who was the offensive line coach at Missouri in that game.
“Do you think I heard about it for 10 years?” Bieniemy says with a laugh. “I will say this, it was a great game. It’s one of those games that’ll be talked about for eons. But we’re not gonna give it back.”
ONE THOUSAND, FOUR hundred miles away in Atlanta, No. 18 Georgia Tech prepared to face No. 15 Clemson the week after the Fifth-Down Game. The Jackets began the year unranked, but players felt confident headed into the season after finishing 1989 with wins in seven of their final eight games.
Their defense began the season on a tear, giving up just 31 total points in the first four games. Once again, their defense came up big against Clemson, making a goal-line stand after the Tigers drove down to the 1-yard line. On eight trips inside Georgia Tech territory, Clemson scored just one touchdown. Still, the Tigers had a shot to win, down 21-19.
Chris Gardocki lined up for a 60-yard field goal attempt with a minute left.
“I was 10 feet away from him on the sideline, and I was telling everybody, ‘We’re done,'” Georgia Tech kicker Scott Sisson said.
But Gardocki missed, and Georgia Tech was off to its best start since 1966. That start got even better on the first weekend in November when the Yellow Jackets headed up to Charlottesville to play No. 1 Virginia.
Vandals had gotten into Scott Stadium the night before the game and burned a section of the turf, leaving questions about whether the game could be played. Georgia Tech quarterback Shawn Jones also said that same night, the fire alarm was pulled at 2 or 3 a.m. at the team hotel, forcing players to get up and evacuate.
“The atmosphere was like a championship playoff game,” Jones said.
But the game did not start out that way. Virginia led 28-14 at halftime, having flummoxed the staunch Georgia Tech defense.
“Some of our offensive players, they were asking us, ‘Hey, man, can y’all stop them? Just slow them down because we’re coming,” Swilling said. “And the look on our faces was like, ‘Man, I don’t know. This might be a long day.’ It just so happened that things began to turn offensively.”
Georgia Tech tied the game after two Virginia turnovers, and then it was back-and-forth until the end. Georgia Tech got the ball with 2:30 to go and the score tied at 38. Jones remembers feeling calm as the offense took the field.
He drove Georgia Tech 56 yards in five plays, setting Sisson up for a 37-yard field goal attempt with 7 seconds left. Sisson was affectionately called “Never Missin’ Sisson” by his teammates. Pressure never seemed to get to him. But as he was warming up on the sideline, he overheard punter Scott Aldridge asking the linemen, “How many diamonds do we want in our championship rings?”
“I kept hearing that, and I thought, ‘I don’t have a choice. I’ve got to make this kick,” Sisson says with a laugh. “These guys are designing the ring. So, like, no pressure, right?”
Sisson nailed the kick. The unbeaten season lived on for another weekend.
COLORADO ENTERED THE Orange Bowl No. 1 in both polls at 10-1-1. It was facing Notre Dame in a rematch. Georgia Tech entered the Citrus Bowl in Orlando, Florida, ranked No. 2 at 10-0-1 and facing Nebraska, which Colorado had beaten earlier in the season.
The Buffaloes thought a win over the Irish would seal their championship season in both polls. Georgia Tech, however, felt a win over Nebraska could possibly leap them ahead.
“I didn’t really think that Colorado was better than we were,” Jones said. “So when we went into the game, I thought, ‘If we handle our business, we should be No. 1.’ We didn’t know how it was going to turn out. We just believed it would.”
Georgia Tech handled Nebraska 45-21 to finish a remarkable season without a loss. The team returned to its hotel in Orlando to watch Colorado in the Orange Bowl later that night.
The Buffaloes told themselves they could not lose to the Irish again. Adversity hit early, when Hagan went down with a knee injury. Johnson entered the game and strained his hamstring, but played through it. The game turned into a defensive showcase. Colorado clung to a 10-9 lead with 1:05 remaining.
The Buffaloes were forced to punt. Notre Dame had Raghib “The Rocket” Ismail, the best returner in the nation, waiting deep. Swilling, watching with teammates, turned to them and said, ‘Watch this. Rocket is about ready to take it to the house.'”
Sure enough, Ismail took the punt and turned right, hit a crease and raced in for the touchdown. Georgia Tech players described their hotel vibrating and shaking in celebration.
“The crazy thing about that was, I remember Coach Mac telling our punter to kick it out of bounds,” Hagan says. “It was a bad snap, and he got rushed, so he just kicked it right down the middle. And everybody just looked at each other like, ‘Oh, no.’ When he scored everybody was like, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me. Here we go again.'”
But the wave of emotions tilted in another direction, for all three teams.
There was a flag down on the field.
“We knew it was against them,” Hagan said. “We went from frustrated and hurt to elated all in a matter of two seconds.”
Notre Dame safety Greg Davis was called for clipping. The touchdown came off the board. Colorado ended up holding on to win, capping what it believed would be a No. 1 finish in both polls.
“It was surreal,” Johnson said. “It was the end of a journey that started two years before, and the way it played out was a metaphor for life. There was never a linear path to our championship. There were all kinds of fits and starts, disappointments, high points. As a collective, we got it done. And the party was on.”
The final polls did not come out that night. Early the next morning, the phone rang in Sisson’s hotel room in Orlando. His roommate shoved the phone into his hand.
It was a radio station Sisson had never heard of. First question: Do you think that you deserve the national championship? What Sisson didn’t know when he answered, groggy and half asleep, was there was also a Colorado player on the line.
“I tried to take the middle of the road,” Sisson said. “I said, ‘I don’t know what else we could do. We were undefeated.’ I had no idea that they were setting me up. I don’t remember who it was, I don’t even think I got his name, but the Colorado player says, ‘Oh, we deserve it, and he started ripping into us, like our strength of schedule. I was like, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me. I am not awake. I am not up for this conversation right now.'”
The teams did not find out how the final polls had them ranked until they returned to their respective campuses. Colorado was the AP champion, with 39 first-place votes compared to 20 for Georgia Tech. But in a stunning reversal, Georgia Tech finished No. 1 in the UPI coaches’ poll — by one point. For the first time in UPI coaches’ poll history, the No. 1 team entering its final game did not finish No. 1 after a bowl victory.
Colorado players always suspected Nebraska coach Tom Osborne had changed his vote to Georgia Tech. Osborne admitted for the first time this week that he did in fact do that, telling USA Today he changed his vote for two reasons: the Fifth-Down Game, and the fact that Georgia Tech beat Nebraska more handily than Colorado.
“That was extremely disappointing, that our rival and our fellow conference member did that,” Johnson said. “We went into Lincoln under extremely hostile conditions to win that football game that propelled us to the national championship. I thought for someone who was, by all accounts, an extremely classy man, that was one of the most classless things I’ve experienced.”
Without a unanimous champion, the question over who was better that season rages on. Neither team visited the White House, but Swilling said he and his teammates secretly wished they could have settled the debate with a game in the Rose Garden.
After his college career, Bieniemy was drafted by the San Diego Chargers in 1991. The following year, the Chargers hired Georgia Tech coach Bobby Ross.
“I used to argue with him all the time,” Bieniemy says. “I’m going to say this out loud. I would say, ‘We would have kicked y’all’s ass.'”
Now 35 years later, the two teams finally get their long-anticipated meeting. And it is all thanks to Colorado athletic director Rick George, who was the assistant athletic director for football operations at Colorado in 1990. About a decade ago, George made a call to someone he knew at Georgia Tech and said simply: “We should play a game.”
The series was announced in 2016, and George specifically chose 2025 as the first game in the home-and-home, knowing it was the 35-year anniversary of their championship(s).
“I just thought it would be fun and good for both schools, and it would be a good game that people would have a lot of interest in,” George says. “It’s a great opportunity to showcase what we both accomplished in that year.”
Memories of their shared … uh … championship season are never far from the minds of the players and coaches who experienced it. After all, that was the last national championship each school has won.
But with renewed interest in Colorado and coach Deion Sanders, and rising expectations around Georgia Tech in Year 3 under Brent Key, their game Friday has turned into must-see TV. Their shared history is just a cherry on top.
“This is an opportunity for us to have a lot of get back, a lot of talk, a lot of pride and passion, winning that game,” Hagan said. “Over the years, they’ve said what they’ve said. We’ve said what we’ve said. Now someone’s going to be able to win the game.”
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment11 months ago
Here are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024