He is Britain’s ambassador to the United States, a former deputy prime minister of the United Kingdom, no less.
He has been a titan of British politics for decades and is the sharpest of operators.
Yet Peter Mandelson has been unable to explain why he counted the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein as his “best pal”.
Warning: This story contains graphic descriptions of sexual acts.
“Wherever he is in the world, he remains my best pal!” Lord Mandelson wrote in Epstein’s 50th birthday book in 2003.
The handwritten words were accompanied by a snap of a dressing-gown-clad Mandelson with Epstein.
Image: Epstein and Mandelson pictured together in the ‘birthday book’ released by the US Congress. Pic: US House Oversight Committee
Image: Peter Mandelson was once dubbed ‘the Prince of Darkness’ in British politics
Lord Mandelson was one of many contributors to the book, which has been made public for the first time after being published by a congressional committee in Washington.
It was compiled by Epstein’s girlfriend and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003, three years before allegations of sexual abuse of minors by Epstein became public.
At the very least, there is the question of judgement for Lord Mandelson.
Image: Lord Mandelson’s appointment to the UK’s most senior diplomatic role overseas came as a surprise to many. Pic: Reuters
The victims of Epstein’s abuse have said repeatedly that anyone close to him would have been fully aware of his behaviour.
While that is unprovable, it is deeply uncomfortable for anyone close to him, and even more so for those who contributed to the birthday book.
The book is hard to read. For page after page, the content is at times graphically sexual.
It contains stories, anecdotes and boasts from friends discussing their sexual escapades with Epstein.
Some of the images are disturbing, including hand-drawn images of Epstein being massaged by three young-looking women on a beach and images of him with girls – their faces blacked out by the US congressional committee which released the book.
‘She left screaming’
One note, from an unknown contributor, reads: “I was porking some girl in bed and Jeff brings in the mains to make beef. She left screaming and never came back.”
It continues: “We’re both in bed porking some girls and I said what do you think, while he’s shoving penicillin down my throat.”
Elsewhere in the book, the full note from Lord Mandelson, accompanied by photos, reads: “Once upon a time, an intelligent, sharp-witted man they call ‘mysterious’ parachuted into my life…
Image: Pic: US House Oversight Committee
“You would spend many hours just waiting for him to turn up. And often, no sooner were you getting used to having him around, you would suddenly be alone… again leaving you with some ‘interesting’ friends to entertain instead… [this caption is accompanied by a photo of two unidentified women].
It continues: “Or just some dogs to keep you company (he wasn’t always so keen on them). But then he would parachute back in… very occasionally, taking you by surprise in some far-off places [this caption accompanied with a whiskey label with Mandelson’s name on it]… or in one of his glorious homes he likes to share with his friends (yum yum). But wherever he is in the world, he remains my best pal!”
Image: Pic: US House Oversight Committee
Image: Pic: US House Oversight Committee
Image: Pic: US House Oversight Committee
Image: Pic: US House Oversight Committee
In May, Sky News asked Lord Mandelson about his relationship with Mr Epstein.
“I’m not answering any questions about him,” he told Sky’s James Matthews. “My knowledge of him is something that I regret. I wish I’d never met him in the first place.”
“Why did you have an association with him?” he was asked.
“Why did many people meet him? He was a prolific networker, and I wish I never met him in the first place,” Mandelson said.
Sources have told Sky News the ambassador was unhappy with our questions. Notably, Sky was not invited to briefings with the embassy for a few months, and engagement with staff there was more challenging.
In February, as he prepared to become the new ambassador, the Financial Times asked Lord Mandelson about his relationship with Epstein.
“I regret ever meeting him or being introduced to him by his partner Ghislaine Maxwell,” he told the paper.
“I regret even more the hurt he caused to many young women. I’m not going to go into this. It’s an FT obsession, and frankly, you can all f*ck off. OK?”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Mandelson has never been accused of any sexual impropriety by any of the Epstein victims.
No comment
He has not made any fresh comments on the notes in the book, but a spokesperson for the British Embassy in Washington had no comment, only referring me to the words from the ambassador in May.
In London, the prime minister’s spokesperson was asked if Sir Keir Starmer had spoken to Mandelson since the emergence of the letter.
The spokesperson said: “I can only refer to the statement the ambassador himself made… I have nothing to add other than what the ambassador has already said about the previous relationship with Epstein… he is focused on the state visit.”
Image: The birthday message to Epstein from Lord Mandelson is signed with a warm flourish Pic: US House Oversight Committee
It’s also not clear if Sir Keir and Number 10 officials were aware of the extent of the ties between Mandelson and Epstein. If they were, that raises serious questions about their own judgement.
That state visit, next week, is now complicated by this news. The degrees of separation for three key characters involved in the visit are deeply awkward.
US President Donald Trump seems increasingly closely associated with Epstein, with the publication of the letter in the book purported to be from him. Mr Trump continues to claim the letter is a fake.
Image: President Trump denies it is his signature on this message
Lord Mandelson’s association now appears to have been much closer than previously known.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
The King’s brother, Prince Andrew, also had an association with Epstein and Maxwell that is well documented. He reached an out-of-court settlement with one Epstein victim who accused Andrew of sexual impropriety. He denies any wrongdoing.
Deeply personal scandal
Lord Mandelson is spearheading Britain’s diplomatic and trade relationship with the United States. He has put the UK in a uniquely good position since he became ambassador at the start of the year.
The state visit will form a key part of the effort to deepen relations with the Trump administration.
There is an expectation of new trade, tech and AI announcements between the president and the prime minister next week.
Lord Mandelson is a master of spin and strategy. He and his advisors will be hoping this deeply personal scandal doesn’t derail diplomatic progress.
But there remains a huge disconnect between his assertion that “my knowledge of him is something that I regret” and this new revelation that Epstein was his “best pal”.
The most advanced US aircraft carrier has travelled to the Caribbean Sea in what has been interpreted as a show of military power and a possible threat to Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro regime.
The USS Gerald R Ford and other warships arrived in the area with a new influx of troops and weaponry on Sunday.
It is the latest step in a military build-up that the Donald Trump administration claims is aimed at preventing criminal cartels from smuggling drugs to America.
Since early September, US strikes have killed at least 80 people in 20 attacks on small boats accused of transporting narcotics in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:43
Trump takes questions on MTG, Epstein and Venezuela
Mr Trump has indicated that military action would expand beyond strikes by sea, saying the US would “stop the drugs coming in by land”.
The US government has released no evidence to support its assertions that those killed in the boats were “narcoterrorists”, however.
The arrival of the USS Gerald R Ford now rounds off the largest increase in US firepower in the region in generations.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
With its arrival, the “Operation Southern Spear” mission includes nearly a dozen navy ships and about 12,000 sailors and marines.
Rear Admiral Paul Lanzilotta, who commands the strike group, said it will bolster an already large force of American warships to “protect our nation’s security and prosperity against narco-terrorism in the Western Hemisphere”.
Image: Donald Trump said the US would ‘stop the drugs coming in by land’. Pic: Reuters
Admiral Alvin Holsey, the US commander who oversees the Caribbean and Latin America, said in a statement that the American forces “stand ready to combat the transnational threats that seek to destabilise our region”.
Government officials in Trinidad and Tobago have announced that they have already begun “training exercises” with the US military that are due to run over the next week.
The island is just seven miles from Venezuela at its closest point.
The country’s minister of foreign affairs, Sean Sobers, said the exercises were aimed at tackling violent crime in Trinidad and Tobago, which is frequently used by drug traffickers as a stopover on their journey to Europe or North America.
Venezuela’s government has described the training exercises as an act of aggression.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:23
Venezuelan president breaks into song during speech
They had no immediate comment on Sunday regarding the arrival of the USS Gerald R Ford.
The US has long used aircraft carriers to pressure and deter aggression by other nations because its warplanes can strike targets deep inside another country.
Some experts say the Ford is ill-suited to fighting cartels, but it could be an effective instrument of intimidation to push Mr Maduro, who faces charges of narcoterrorism in the US, to step down.
Mr Maduro has said the US government is “fabricating” a war against him.
The US president has justified the attacks on drug boats by saying the country is in “armed conflict” with drug cartels, while claiming the boats are operated by foreign terrorist organisations.
US politicians have pressed Mr Trump for more information on who is being targeted and the legal justification for the boat strikes.
Elizabeth Dickinson, the International Crisis Group’s senior analyst for the Andes region, said: “This is the anchor of what it means to have US military power once again in Latin America.
“And it has raised a lot of anxieties in Venezuela but also throughout the region. I think everyone is watching this with sort of bated breath to see just how willing the US is to really use military force.”
Donald Trump has urged Republicans to vote for the release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein – a reversal of his previous opposition to the move.
The president said on Truth Social that politicians from his own party should back the move.
“We have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party…” Mr Trump wrote.
One email described Mr Trump as “that dog that hasn’t barked” and that “Virginia spent hours at my house with him”.
The White House said the emails were selectively leaked to “create a fake narrative to smear President Trump”.
The president has always denied any wrongdoing and said he fell out with the disgraced financier way before his crimes against underage girls came to light.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
However, pressure to release all government documents about Epstein – who killed himself in 2019 – has increased amid persistent rumours of a cover-up.
A growing number of Republican lawmakers and loyal Trump supporters also want the documents made public.
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a staunch MAGA loyalist, backed the petition that proposed holding the vote and provoked a vicious backlash from the president – who labelled her a “traitor” and a “ranting lunatic”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
13:31
The new Epstein files: The key takeaways
The bill would force the Justice Department to release all files and communications on Epstein, as well as any information about his death in prison – another persistent topic among conspiracy theorists.
Information about victims or ongoing federal investigations would be redacted.
Image: Trump has lashed out at Ms Greene over her support for a vote to be held
Democratic representative Ro Khanna – an original sponsor of the petition – said on Sunday he expected 40 Republicans to support the move.
However, Republican Thomas Massie told US media “100 or more” of his colleagues could vote for the bill.
The Republicans currently have 219 seats in the House of Representatives against 214 for the Democrats, suggesting it will pass. However, its fate in the Senate is unclear.
The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, struck a similar tone to the president as he sought to play down the vote.
He told Fox News on Sunday: “We’ll just get this done and move it on. There’s nothing to hide.”
Donald Trump has said he will sue the BBC for between $1bn and $5bn over the editing of his speech on Panorama.
The US president confirmed he would be taking legal action against the broadcaster while on Air Force One overnight on Saturday.
“We’ll sue them. We’ll sue them for anywhere between a billion (£792m) and five billion dollars (£3.79bn), probably sometime next week,” he told reporters.
“We have to do it, they’ve even admitted that they cheated. Not that they couldn’t have not done that. They cheated. They changed the words coming out of my mouth.”
Mr Trump then told reporters he would discuss the matter with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer over the weekend, and claimed “the people of the UK are very angry about what happened… because it shows the BBC is fake news”.
Separately, Mr Trump told GB News: “I’m not looking to get into lawsuits, but I think I have an obligation to do it.
“This was so egregious. If you don’t do it, you don’t stop it from happening again with other people.”
More on Bbc
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
11:02
BBC crisis: How did it happen?
The Daily Telegraph reported earlier this month that an internal memo raised concerns about the BBC’s editing of a speech made by Mr Trump on 6 January 2021, just before a mob rioted at the US Capitol building, on the news programme.
The concerns regard clips spliced together from sections of the president’s speech to make it appear he told supporters he was going to walk to the US Capitol with them to “fight like hell” in the documentary Trump: A Second Chance?, which was broadcast by the BBC the week before last year’s US election.
Following a backlash, both BBC director-general Tim Davie and BBC News chief executive Deborah Turness resigned from their roles.
‘No basis for defamation claim’
On Thursday, the broadcaster officially apologised to the president and added that it was an “error of judgement” and the programme will “not be broadcast again in this form on any BBC platforms”.
A spokesperson said that “the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited,” but they also added that “we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim”.
Earlier this week, Mr Trump’s lawyers threatened to sue the BBC for $1bn unless it apologised, retracted the clip, and compensated him.
Image: The US president said he would sue the broadcaster for between $1bn and $5bn. File pic: PA
Legal challenges
But legal experts have said that Mr Trump would face challenges taking the case to court in the UK or the US.
The deadline to bring the case to UK courts, where defamation damages rarely exceed £100,000 ($132,000), has already expired because the documentary aired in October 2024, which is more than one year.
Also because the documentary was not shown in the US, it would be hard to show that Americans thought less of the president because of a programme they could not watch.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:05
Sky’s Katie Spencer on what BBC bosses told staff on call over Trump row
Newsnight allegations
The BBC has said it was looking into fresh allegations, published in The Telegraph, that its Newsnight show also selectively edited footage of the same speech in a report broadcast in June 2022.
A BBC spokesperson said: “The BBC holds itself to the highest editorial standards. This matter has been brought to our attention and we are now looking into it.”