Connect with us

Published

on

Andy Burnham has hit out at allies of Sir Keir Starmer for “demanding simplistic statements of loyalty”, claiming they are underestimating the “peril” Labour is in.

The mayor of Greater Manchester insisted his recent interventions have not been about “personal ambition”, but starting an “open debate” about the direction of the party ahead of potentially catastrophic local and devolved elections next year.

In the lead up to Labour’s annual conference in Liverpool this week, the so-called “King of the North” has accused Sir Keir of having no vision for the country, while setting out his own policy proposals.

Follow the latest from our politics team

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

It has fuelled mounting speculation he could launch a future leadership challenge against the prime minister, who in turn has compared Mr Burnham to Liz Truss.

At a fringe event on the opening day of the conference, the Northern mayor said: “I was clear in the interviews I gave last week, I wanted to launch a debate about the direction of the party and getting a plan to beat Reform UK.

More from Politics

“Those out there making calls for simplistic statements of loyalty are underestimating the peril the party is in.”

Two polls this week have predicted Reform UK leader Nigel Farage will become the next prime minister, while a poll of Labour members found more than half of them don’t want Sir Keir to fight the next general election.

Mr Burnham later turned up to a rally about Proportional Representation (PR), in which he insisted he wanted “this government to work”.

He received a rapturous reception as he entered the room, flanked by over a dozen photographers.

Andy Bunrham flanked by media at a fringe event
Image:
Andy Bunrham flanked by media at a fringe event

Mr Burnham made light of the attention, quipping that “there’s nothing more unstoppable than an idea whose time has come”, in reference to PR.

But this was not the focus of the punchy speech that followed, in which he criticised the Labour leadership’s handling of dissent, saying a “climate of fear” was preventing MPs from having an “open debate” about the direction of the party.

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

A handful of Labour MPs have been suspended over the past year for criticising the government on issues like welfare reform and the two child benefit cap, but Mr Burnham has the freedom to be outspoken as he is not a member of parliament.

He said he had been accused of “all sorts of things” in the past week but had done “nothing more than launch a debate”.

Mr Burnham drew clear dividing lines in a recent interview with The New Statesman, as he said the country should be “less in hock to the bond markets”, called for a greater focus on council housing and said public utilities should be nationalised.

It fuelled speculation of an impending leadership challenge, given Mr Burnham fought twice to run the Labour Party while he was an MP, before stepping down in 2017 to run for the metro mayor position. He has not ruled out a return to Westminster and last week claimed Labour MPs have privately asked him to stand.

Sir Keir tried to shut down the narrative by suggesting Mr Burnham’s policies would unleash the economic chaos of Ms Truss, whose fatal mini budget sent the markets into meltdown, as he dismissed the “personal ambitions of the mayor”.

However, in a direct message to “those who say that I’m speaking out purely for my own ambition”, a defiant Mr Burnham said: “I can say to you tonight I am speaking out for the thousands of councillors here at this conference who are worried about going to those doorsteps next May, speaking for the members of the Senedd who, again, are working hard to keep Wales Labour… and, of course, members of the Scottish parliament as well, who want a stronger story about Labour to go to those doorsteps.

“I’m speaking out for the millions of good people around Britain who want a more hopeful direction for the country.

“I think we can do it. I honestly believe it can be done. We can make this government work, we can find that more hopeful direction and we can win again at the next general election.”

The speech was met with a big round of applause from members, while one Labour MP told Sky News it was a “great speech”.

And while cabinet ministers have called for the party to unite behind the prime minister to fight Reform UK – there appeared to a change in tone from Wes Streeting as the first day of conference drew to a close.

The health secretary told a fringe event that the government must be “open to challenge” from within.

He said: “We’ve got to be self-confident enough as ministers to be open to challenge, and openly debate different ideas, because it makes you stronger as a government.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour’s dilemma: The two-child benefit cap

Published

on

By

Labour's dilemma: The two-child benefit cap

The two-child benefit cap: To scrap or not to scrap?

There is an ongoing row in the Labour Party about welfare spending and how to cut it while maintaining protections for the most vulnerable.

Those on the left are suspicious of anything that may look or smell like balancing the books on the backs of the poorest in society.

Those on the other side point to an unsustainable welfare bill that has been allowed to balloon under the Conservatives and looks set to continue under Labour.

Rachel Reeves will have to weigh up finding between £3bn and £4bn to scrap the cap, or face the wrath of Labour MPs on small majorities who believe they were elected to deliver on ‘Labour values’ like lifting this very cap.

But perhaps there is a compromise the chancellor could opt for, which may placate the left of her party while needing less cash.

For example, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, lifting the cap from two to three children would cost £2.6bn; or a tapered system, where parents got the full amount for the first two kids and then half the amount for any subsequent children, would cost around £1.8bn.

But Labour big beast David Blunkett – the only senior Labour figure against lifting the cap – wants to see a more nuanced approach.

Blunkett believes the cap ought to remain, but he wants there to be exemptions for disabled children and parents who have been widowed, and he would prefer the government to focus on anti-child poverty measures and improving pathways to work for parents, all paid for by a tax on gambling – something former prime minister Gordon Brown has been agitating for.

Read more:
What is the two-child benefit cap?
What tax rises could Rachel Reeves announce?

At a time when the government perpetually reminds us of how little money it has and how much strain public finances are under due to austerity, finding several billion to scrap a policy that is broadly popular with the public may seem like an unwise move.

According to the latest polling from YouGov, 59% of the public are in favour of keeping the cap in place, and only 26% thought it should be abolished.

But politically, the chancellor is aware of the strength of feeling within her party about reducing child poverty as soon as possible, and her colleague, the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, has stressed the party has a “moral mission” to tackle child poverty.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why did Labour delay their child poverty strategy?

Irrespective of what Reeves chooses, her political woes do not end there.

Taxes are set to go up in the budget later this month, and Reeves has refused to rule out breaking her manifesto promise of not raising taxes on working people.

This combined with persistently disappointing voter intention polling for Labour, could spell deep dissatisfaction among the public.

A decision to lift the two-child benefit cap may boost morale among Labour MPs, but if it’s not enough to prevent the loss of hundreds of political foot soldiers in May’s local elections, Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer will need to find more red meat to throw to their party before too long.

Continue Reading

Politics

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

Published

on

By

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

As deliberations entered their second day in a criminal trial over a $25 million exploit, jurors asked for clarification on previous testimony and the definition of “good faith.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

Published

on

By

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

While Coinbase insists that the US Treasury cannot override Congress’s intent on the GENIUS Act, banks continue to press for a blanket ban on stablecoin interest.

Continue Reading

Trending