“I am proud to be Scottish. I don’t want them here.”
Standing on the balcony of his flat in Glasgow, George drapes the saltire Scottish flag as he explains his anti-immigration stance.
“We can’t afford to keep all these people coming in,” he says. “There’s too many people coming in.”
George, who lives on the Wyndford estate in Glasgow’s Maryhill, is not alone.
Warning: This report contains material some may find offensive.
Image: ‘There’s too many people coming in,’ says George from Glasgow
Streets across the city are filling with white and blue flags hanging from lampposts.
Immigration has not been centre stage in Scottish politics for many years – but the mood appears to be shifting.
Glasgow is the frontline of the UK’s immigration system, with more arrivals than anywhere else.
With community tensions spiking and accommodation costs rising to £4.5m a month, the city’s leaders are demanding a pause on relocations.
Glasgow’s financial burden spirals
In 1999, the city signed up to the UK’s “dispersal” system, which saw asylum seekers relocated by the Home Office in exchange for cash.
It was a bygone era, when Glasgow’s high-rise housing was in abundance and modern pressures were less acute.
The landscape has changed drastically, with many tower blocks flattened amid regeneration.
Once an asylum seeker is given the right to stay in the UK, they become a refugee and switch from being the responsibility of the Home Office to the local authority.
While immigration is controlled by Westminster, housing and healthcare are among the issues dealt with by the Scottish government.
Scotland’s homelessness legislation means councils must house anyone without a home.
It is a more generous policy than in England, where usually only those with “priority need” are given a roof over their head.
It is suggested the Scottish policy is drawing people to Glasgow at the same time the Home Office is “mass processing” a backlog of asylum cases and granting some the right to stay in the UK.
Latest figures show Glasgow was the local authority with the highest proportion of housed asylum seekers at 59 per 10,000 inhabitants (a total of 3,716).
City officials argue the issues are coming together to create a crisis, with the financial burden spiralling.
Councillors are pleading for more financial assistance from Westminster, but so far that has not been forthcoming.
Image: Streets across Glasgow are filling with flags hanging from lampposts
‘We will be the underdogs’
Scotland has traditionally been seen as a left-leaning nation where inward migration is welcomed.
The tourism industry relies heavily on people coming to work, and it is no secret that Brexit caused issues for hospitality staffing.
The issue has not dominated the public conversation in Scotland, but polls suggest, for the first time in a long while, it is a rising concern.
It is still not a priority for most Scots – but it is beginning to seep into the narrative.
Up the road from where George lives in Maryhill, we come across an 84-year-old woman who asks us not to show her face on camera.
Image: This woman claimed people from Glasgow ‘will be the underdogs’
Immigration is “getting out of control”, she says.
“It looks like they are going to overspill us,” she says. “We will be the underdogs.”
When challenged on her evidence for her claims, she responds: “I don’t have any evidence”.
Asked what she means by “they”, she says: “All the ones that are coming in, especially Muslims.”
She said she was not racist but was instead saying “just truth” and “my opinion”.
We meet Audrey Cameron, a mother whose children have additional learning needs.
She told me: “I’ve got an older son who lives with me who can’t get a house, but yet you come in to this country, and you get a house no bother. I know people say they don’t, but they do.
Image: Glasgow does not have the infrastructure to deal with asylum seekers, says Audrey Cameron
“There is more black and every other colour than there is white.”
When challenged that others may think a multicultural society is something that should be welcomed, Ms Cameron says: “We don’t have the infrastructure for it.
“We don’t have the housing. Even trying to get a doctor’s appointment is a nightmare. There has to be a limit.
“There are too many immigrants in this area. They are not spread out. They are all congregated.”
‘They are not stealing your jobs’
Andy Sirel, a leading immigration lawyer and co-founder of Just Right Scotland, tells Sky News that misinformation is fuelling the public discourse and politicians need to act.
Image: There are misconceptions about the support for asylum seekers, says immigration lawyer Andy Sirel
He says: “When a person is in the United Kingdom, they are not allowed to work, they are not allowed to claim benefits, they are not stealing your jobs.
“If they are in a hotel, which they don’t want to be in, they are on £9 a week. It is simply not true the narrative that is being put out.
“The issue is being used as a scapegoat by various political actors.
“It is predicated on immigration, or higher levels of immigration, being why the standard of living has dropped and the reason public services are suffering, which is simply not the case.”
Image: Accommodation costs for asylum seekers in Glasgow have risen to £4.5m a month
The town with deep divides over immigration
Falkirk is a mid-size town with a population of approximately 150,000, around 30 miles from Glasgow city centre. It has become a flashpoint for protest between pro and anti-immigration groups.
A dilapidated and crumbling old hotel, the Cladhan, is home to dozens of mostly men in their 20s, 30s and 40s awaiting their asylum cases being heard.
The Home Office pays for accommodation, meals and financial allowances for asylum seekers, given the rules banning them seeking employment.
Image: Tensions over the asylum hotel in Falkirk have been rising
A brick was thrown through a window recently in an attack Scotland’s First Minister John Swinney branded “despicable”.
During a rally outside the hotel, Sky News filmed one man performing a Nazi salute, while a banner was held up saying “Kill ‘Em All, Let God Sort ‘Em Out”.
Others, from the community group Falkirk For All, chanted “refugees are welcome here”.
“We are standing up against the scapegoating of refugees. [We are] standing up against racism,” Georgia Henderson from the group said.
“We have been shocked by what we saw. We are highly motivated to turn up and protect the people of the hotel.”
Dr Teresa Piacentini, an expert in migration from Glasgow University, said many people are misinformed when discussing this issue.
She said: “Claiming asylum is a right. To claim asylum is not to do something illegal. You have a legal entitlement to claim asylum.
“People that are being held in the asylum hotels have claimed asylum so are exercising a right to be here. And while their asylum claim is being processed, they are here legally.
“Illegal has become a convenient catch-all phrase that doesn’t actually reveal the complexity and nuance behind it.”
Tensions in Falkirk have been heightened since a former resident of the asylum hotel raped a 15-year-old girl in the town.
Asylum seeker Sadeq Nikzad, 29, was jailed for nine years in June.
We spoke to two men who are currently living in the hotel after being bussed up to Falkirk from London.
Nechirvan, 31, arrived in March 2024 after crossing the English Channel.
He says he fled Iraq and had been living in Europe, mostly Germany, for 10 years before making the journey to the UK.
He claims he “couldn’t stay” on the continent any more because “they are deporting people”.
Asked whether he understands the anger from some that it is mostly young men entering on small boats, he says: “We are not safe in our country.
“It is not easy. Not easy for family to cross the water. That’s why they not bring the family.”
Nechirvan describes sleepless nights as protests ramp up outside the asylum hotel.
Image: Nechirvan says he fled Iraq and had been living in Europe before arriving in the UK
Another asylum seeker living in Falkirk, who did not want to be identified, says he came to the UK from West Africa.
In response to rising tensions, he says: “I don’t blame anybody. People have some valid reasons to feel angry but what is important is that we are all human beings.”
Image: This asylum seeker from West Africa says he can understand the concerns of some
“You cannot put everyone in one category, classing everyone as racist,” he adds.
“What I know is people have valid reasons, but not everyone in the hotel is bad. Some of the people if you listen to what they went through, you’d sympathise with them.
“You may have your own reasons for doing what you are doing but let’s just live peacefully.”
Image: Anti-migration protesters outside the Cladhan hotel in Falkirk
The Home Office told Sky News it is attempting to reduce the number of people in hotels.
A spokesman said: “This government inherited a broken asylum and immigration system. We are taking practical steps to turn that chaos around – including doubling asylum decision-making to clear the backlog left by the previous government and reducing the number of people in hotels by 6,000 in the first half of 2025.
“We continue to work with local councils, NGOs and other stakeholders to ensure any necessary assistance is provided for those individuals who are granted refugee status.”
Migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu, who was wrongly freed from prison, has claimed in an interview with Sky News that he tried to hand himself in to police a day before he was arrested, but was ignored by officers.
The Home Office said Kebatu, 38, was deported from the UK on Tuesday night.
Speaking to Sky News after he arrived back in Ethiopia on Wednesday morning, Kebatu shared details of his accidental release from HMP Chelmsford on 24 October and the two-day manhunt that followed.
The convicted sex offender was repeatedly questioned on his crimes, but Sky News has chosen not to broadcast this part of the interview.
‘Ignored’ by police
The morning after he was released from prison, Kebatu claimed he tried to hand himself into police, but was ignored.
He said: “I [told] police, look here, police I am wanted man, I am arrested, I will give you my hand, please help where is police station? He ignored me, he drove [off].”
He added that he told the officer his name and that he was mistakenly released from prison.
“I am not unknown. The police station, where is the place? But also I go to police, I will give you my hand please help me where is the police station, take me, I am wanted.
“You know me, or my image, my name is Hadush Kabatu, nationality Ethiopia. Please, I was the mistake release from Chelmsford prison. Please help me.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:45
Moment Hadush Kebatu put on deportation flight
Responding to Kebatu’s claims, the Metropolitan Police told Sky News: “The Met is not aware of any evidence to support the claims that Kebatu approached officers on Saturday morning.
“The actions of officers who responded to the sighting of him on Sunday morning show how seriously they were taking the manhunt. Kebatu’s actions on the morning of his arrest were more like those of someone trying to avoid officers, not trying to hand himself in.”
Release from prison
Kebatu was released by HMP Chelmsford a month into his 12-month sentence on the expectation he would be picked up by immigration enforcement.
He said after he was released he waited more than three hours outside the prison, for what he described as someone who was “responsible” for him.
He said: “At that time I am waiting more than three hours… who [is] responsible for me? Where is Home Office, where is [immigration]?
“I was told there was a bus. Also, all the experts, they all ignored me.”
In another Sky News story, a delivery driver who spoke to Kebatu outside Chelmsford prison said he looked “confused”.
The driver said he was approached by the prisoner, who had no idea where he was supposed to go. He said Kebatu waited outside the prison for roughly “an hour and a half” before leaving.
Kebatu said after he left the prison, he asked a passerby where the train station was. He claimed someone helped him, and bought him a train ticket for £18.
Image: Kebatu’s movements the day he was released from prison
The Ethiopian national arrived in the UK on a small boat on 29 June. Days after his arrival, he sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl and a woman in Epping, Essex, where he was staying.
He was found guilty of two counts of sexual assault, one count of attempted sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and one count of harassment without violence.
When approached by Sky News, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) pointed to a statement made by Justice Secretary David Lammy upon Kebatu’s deportation: “Kebatu has been returned to Ethiopia where he belongs.
“I am grateful to Home Office colleagues for acting swiftly to secure his deportation. I have been clear from the outset that a mistake of this nature is unacceptable, and we must get to the bottom of what happened.
“I have established an independent investigation chaired by Dame Lynne Owens into last Friday’s events to get the public the answers they rightly deserve, and we have introduced the strictest checks ever seen in our prison system to stop similar unacceptable errors in future.”
Essex Police, who arrested Kebatu after the assaults in July, told Sky News: “Our officers responded quickly to the reports of the sexual assaults committed in Epping and arrested Hadush Kebatu on the same day the offences were reported to us.
“Kebatu was then immediately remanded in custody, while officers acted diligently and professionally securing charges and building a case which saw Kebatu convicted following a trial. Protecting women and girls is a priority for Essex Police and our swift and thorough actions highlight our commitment to this.”
Migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu was given £500 to be deported to Ethiopia following his mistaken release from prison, Sky News understands.
The government, who confirmed he was escorted on to a plane at Heathrow Airport on Tuesday night, said he has no right to return to the UK.
But Sky News understands Kebatu was handed a discretionary payment of £500 as part of efforts to avoid a lengthy legal challenge after he made threats to disrupt his removal.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she “pulled every lever” to deport Kebatu, although it is thought the decision about the payment was made by removal teams, not ministers.
“I am pleased to confirm this vile child sex offender has been deported. Our streets are safer because of it,” she said.
Image: Hadush Kebatu seen on the plane during his deportation flight
Image: Hadush Kebatu was arrested on Sunday after his mistaken release
He was expected to be deported, but instead of being handed over to immigration officials, he was released in error from HMP Chelmsford on Friday.
He spent just under 48 hours at large before he was apprehended.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:52
Prisoner releases: ‘A problem on the rise’
The accidental release sparked widespread alarm and questions over how a man whose crimes sparked protests in Epping over the use of asylum hotels was able to be freed.
Ms Mahmood said: “Last week’s blunder should never have happened – and I share the public’s anger that it did.”
Image: Anti-asylum demonstrators in Epping, Essex. Pic: PA
On Sunday, Justice Secretary David Lammy said an exclusive Sky News interview will be used as part of an independent inquiry into the mistaken release.
Speaking to Sky’s national correspondent Tom Parmenter, a delivery driver who spoke to Kebatu at HMP Chelmsford described him as being “confused” as he was being guided to the railway station by prison staff.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:44
Local council reads family statement: ‘My family feels massively let down’
The migrant is said to have returned to the prison reception four or five times before leaving the area on a train heading to London.
Mr Lammy, who put Kebatu’s release down to human error, said he has ordered an “urgent review” into the checks that take place when an offender is released from prison, and new safeguards have been added that amount to the “strongest release checks that have ever been in place”.
A university academic who is receiving “substantial damages” for how he was portrayed in a film has told Sky News he hasn’t received an apology from star Steve Coogan – nor the two companies involved in its production.
Richard Taylor said he was “shell-shocked” after seeing The Lost King for the first time, a film about how Richard III’s skeleton was discovered below a car park in Leicester.
He told The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee:“I wasn’t consulted or even knew I was in the film. The first I hear is I get a phone call while I’m on holiday – and eventually, after press previews, I persuade the producers to let me see a preview.”
Image: Richard III
Last year, a judge ruled that Mr Taylor was depicted as “smug, unduly dismissive and patronising” – with the plot suggesting he “knowingly” misled the public.
“I’m portrayed by someone on screen who looks like me, who sounds like me, who dresses like me – but behaves in a way that falls so far short of the standards I set for myself and what others might reasonably expect of me,” the academic explained.
Mr Taylor revealed he received emails at work telling him to “rot in hell”, while others described him as a “disgrace”.
He added: “Something that was a collaborative effort that showcased the best of British universities in my view was turned into this farce – where I was the villain and portrayed in a way that was completely inconsistent with the reality and the truth.”
Now chief operating officer at Loughborough University, Mr Taylor said “none of the facts” in the 2022 film were ever checked – and the Alan Partridge star, his company Baby Cow and Pathe Productions did not reach out to him before its release.
“The producers just went ahead, filmed it, produced it, stuck it out there and left me to deal with all the flack and all the fallout from it. Grossly unfair and I feel vindicated from the result we’ve achieved,” he told Sky News.
Image: Steve Coogan and two production companies have agreed to pay ‘substantial damages’. Pic: PA
‘The film’s going to look pretty silly’
As part of the settlement, an on-screen clarification will now be added to the start of the film, but no scenes will be removed.
When asked whether he was satisfied with this outcome, Mr Taylor replied: “I’d have liked them to re-edit the film, but one’s got to be realistic about what one can achieve.
“The insertion of the card will say that the person on screen is a fictitious portrayal – and the real Richard Taylor didn’t behave like that … so the film’s going to look pretty silly.”
Image: The statue of Richard III outside Leicester Cathedral. Pic: Shropshire Matt/PA
The case was due to proceed to trial, but a High Court hearing on Monday heard that the parties had settled the claim.
In a statement afterwards, Cooganhad said: “If it wasn’t for Philippa Langley, Richard III would still be lying under a car park in Leicester. It is her name that will be remembered in relation to the discovery of the lost king, long after Richard Taylor has faded into obscurity.”
He went on to add: “That is the story I wanted to tell, and I am happy I did.”
Reacting to the statement, Mr Taylor argued “it’s a pretty strange definition of happy when you’ve had to settle a defamation claim for seven figures in costs”.
He said: “Steve is never anything other than certain in himself and of his own position, but I think he’s got it wrong – basic facts were not checked.”