People walk by a banner featuring the logo of Palantir Technologies (PLTR) at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on the day of their initial public offering (IPO) in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., September 30, 2020.
Andrew Kelly | Reutersa
When Palantir hit the stock market in September 2020, there was a lot that could go wrong. The Covid pandemic was sweeping across the globe, society was in lockdown and markets were volatile.
Meanwhile, Palantir was operating at a loss while dealing with ongoing criticism over its government work, in particular with U.S. Customs and Immigration. And the company was going public through a direct listing rather than a traditional IPO.
At its opening price of $10 per share, Palantir was valued at $16.5 billion, down from its private market peak of $20.4 billion in 2015.
“It was the beginning of the pandemic, no one knew what was happening,” CFO David Glazer said in an interview. “The stock market wasn’t ripping, everyone wasn’t trying to go public, and we decided to go public as quickly as possible.”
Exactly five years later, Palantir has reached heights that would’ve been hard for even the biggest bulls to fathom.
The stock price has surged more than 1,700%, closing on Tuesday at $182.42 for a market cap of over $432 billion. That puts it among the 20 most-valuable U.S. companies, and above tech stalwarts like Cisco and IBM. Last year, Palantir joined the S&P 500, replacing American Airlines.
Quarterly revenue surpassed $1 billion for the first time last quarter, and is expected to reach $4.2 billion this year, according to analysts surveyed by LSEG, up almost sixfold from 2019. The company’s roster of customers grew from 125 in the first half of 2020 to 849 at the end of June. During that time, Palantir has added 1,500 full-time employees.
CEO Alex Karp, who founded the company in 2003 alongside notable investors like Peter Thiel and Joe Lonsdale, was exerting optimism on day one of Palantir’s life on the public market.
“We’ve reached a base where our company is very significant,” Karp, who holds a law degree from Stanford and PhD in neoclassical social theory from Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, told CNBC in an interview on listing day. “Being in the public space will help us with our clients and help us grow.”
Its dizzying ascent since then has perplexed Wall Street, which is unfamiliar with these kinds of multiples, especially for companies of this size.
Palantir trades for 226 times earnings over the next 12 months, with a forward revenue multiple of over 80. Those numbers dwarf even the multiples on Tesla, which trades for 194 times forward earnings and 14 times revenue over the next year.
In a report last month, Citron Research’s Andrew Left, a noted short-seller, called Palantir “detached from fundamentals and analysis.” When compared to OpenAI’s recent $500 billion valuation, he said Palantir should be priced at $40, or less than one-quarter of its current price, if it was assessed the same revenue multiple as the artificial intelligence startup.
“Karp and his team should be proud. But for investors, that’s where discipline kicks in,” Left wrote. “Comparison is the enemy of happiness, and when measured against true AI leaders, Palantir’s price already reflects success beyond its fundamentals.”
Karp, who doesn’t shy away from a dispute, recently told detractors to “exit” if they “don’t like the price.”
“We are going to be the most important software company in the world, and people will figure out what that’s valued over a long period of time,” Karp said on the day of the company’s NYSE debut.
Palantir declined to make Karp available for an interview.
Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, attending the annual Allen & Co. Media and Technology Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, on July 9, 2025.
David A. Grogan | CNBC
Valuation isn’t the only source of controversy. Critics have also raised concerns about how Palantir’s tools are being used by the likes of ICE and other government agencies.
Palantir was founded as a response to national security threats in the wake of 9/11. The company developed hefty software that it helped customize for clients to enable them to compile and analyze large data sets. On its website, Palantir says that it’s partnered with the U.S. Army since 2008, “embedding alongside users to design and deploy modern mission essential software solutions.”
Federal documents from April show that ICE paid Palantir $30 million to provide “real-time visibility” on people self-deporting. Earlier this year, the New York Times reported that Palantir is helping the Trump administration gather data on Americans.
In a blog post, Palantir called the reporting “reckless and irresponsible.” Karp said in a June interview with CNBC that Palantir was “not surveilling Americans.”
‘Not just about Israel’
The company has also faced backlash for providing technology to the Ukrainian and Israeli militaries.
Karp told CNBC in March 2024 that employees had left the company due to his public support of Israel, and that he expected more to leave. Palantir took out a full-page ad in The New York Times following the deadly Oct. 7 attack by Hamas the prior year that said the company “stands with Israel.”
“From my perspective, it’s not just about Israel,” Karp said in the CNBC interview. “It’s like, ‘Do you believe in the West? Do you believe the West has created a superior way of living?'”
Over the last five years, Palantir has scooped up big government deals against contractors like RTX and partnered with aerospace giants such as L3Harris and Boeing. Over the summer, the company landed a software and data contract with the Army worth up to $10 billion.
Karp has long been an unapologetic defender of Palantir’s business pursuits.
Originally headquartered in Palo Alto, California, Karp moved the company to Denver in 2020 as he grew increasingly disgruntled with what he viewed as Silicon Valley’s monoculture.
In a letter to investors ahead of its direct listing, Karp said, “the engineering elite” of Silicon Valley do not know “how society should be organized or what justice requires” and that the company shares “fewer and fewer of the technology sector’s values and commitments.”
While Palantir has been a standout performer on the market over the past five years, long-term investors had to weather some dark days along the way.
By the end of 2020, Palantir’s stock had jumped to $23.55, a gain of almost 136%. In Karp’s letter ahead of the direct listing, he asserted that “effective software can be essential to an organization’s survival” during times of crisis.
Skepticism started building in the second half of 2021. Early the following year, rising interest rates and soaring inflation pushed investors out of risky securities and into safer assets like bonds. Palantir shares lost two-thirds of their value in 2022, closing the year at $6.42, well below the direct listing price.
But November of that year brought with it the introduction of ChatGPT and a new era of AI that revived and redefined the tech industry.
Palantir launched its AI platform called AIP in April 2023. It was designed to help securely integrate large language models when dealing with sensitive data, making it much faster and more efficient for Palantir’s technology to pull in and analyze information.
The company has attributed much of its expansion in the commercial market to AIP. Government business still accounts for most of its revenue, but Palantir has attracted corporate clients such as Wendy’s and American Airlines.
Glazer said on the latest earnings call in August that the total contract value of bookings in the quarter soared 185% to $1.1 billion, with U.S. commercial revenue jumping 93% from a year earlier.
“AIP continues to drive existing customer expansion and new customer conversions in the U.S.,” Glazer said.
One customer the company cited was auto supplier Lear and a recent five-year partnership between the two. Palantir said that Lear uses AIP for help with “proactively managing their tariff exposure, automating multiple administrative workflows, and dynamically balancing their manufacturing lines.”
Palantir’s stock soared 341% last year and is up another 141% so far in 2025.
The AI is getting a lot of use in government, too.
In 2024, Palantir landed a contract to create AI-powered mobile ground stations able to collect data for soldiers using space sensors. In May of this year, the Pentagon lifted the company’s total ceiling for its Maven Smart Systems contract for AI capabilities to $1.3 billion.
Akash Jain, Palantir’s technology chief and president of its U.S. government business, said in an interview that AI has created a whole new set of risks, forcing the government to rethink how it uses commercial technologies.
“We’re perfectly positioned for the growth,” he said.
Vlad Tenev, chief executive officer of Robinhood Markets Inc., during the Token2049 conference in Singapore, on Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025.
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images
The tokenization of real-world assets, from stocks to real estate, will spread to financial markets around the world, according to Robinhood Markets Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev.
“Tokenization is like a freight train. It can’t be stopped, and eventually it’s going to eat the entire financial system,” Tenev told a panel at a crypto conference in Singapore on Wednesday.
“I think most major markets will have some framework in the next five years,” he said, though he added that reaching 100% could take more than a decade.
A tokenized asset is a digital representation of a real-world asset, like stocks, bonds, or commodities, that can be recorded and traded on a blockchain or distributed ledger.
In June, Robinhood began offering more than 200 tokenized U.S. stocks to customers in the European Union, giving them a new way to gain exposure to the underlying assets. The move sent its stock surging to a then-record high.
“I think it will become the default way to get exposure to U.S. stocks outside the U.S.,” Tenev said.
He expects the practice to gain traction once there is greater licensing and regulatory clarity in more jurisdictions.
“I think that will come, starting in Europe, but then expanding to the rest of the world,” he said.
On the other hand, Tenev expects the U.S. to be among the last economies to actually fully tokenize, due to what he calls the greater sticking power of the financial infrastructure.
The crypto industry has long predicted that a mass tokenization of assets on the blockchain was coming, promising greater market efficiency.
And, along with Robinhood’s launch of tokenized stocks, there’s been more signs this year that real implementation is coming, with institutional giants Morgan Stanley and BlackRock signaling interest.
“I actually think cryptocurrency and traditional finance have been living in two separate worlds for a while, but they’re going to fully merge,” Tenev said at the event.
He cited stablecoins — digital currencies designed not to fluctuate wildly, and pegged to a commodity or a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar — as an early example of a tokenized real-world asset.
“I think that crypto technology has so many advantages over the traditional way we’re doing things that in the future there’s going to be no distinction,” Tenev said.
Co-founder and Chief Science Officer at Hugging Face, Thomas Wolf, speaks at the opening ceremony of the Web Summit, in Lisbon, Portugal, November 11, 2024.
Pedro Nunes | Reuters
Current artificial intelligence models from labs like OpenAI are unlikely to lead to major scientific breakthroughs, a tech co-founder said, pouring cold water on some of the hype around the technology and claims by major figures in the field.
The comments by Thomas Wolf, co-founder of $4.5 billion AI startup Hugging Face, are in stake contrast to those by major names in AI including OpenAI boss Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei.
When Wolf talks about scientific breakthroughs, he means novel ideas like those at a Nobel Prize level. Examples including Nicolaus Copernicus who theorized the sun was at the center of the universe and other planets move round it.
Wolf explained a couple of issues with chatbots right now. The first is that these products like ChatGPT and others often agree or align with the person prompting it. Think back to if you’ve asked a chatbot a prompt and it will tell you how interesting or great that question is.
The second is that the models underpinning these chatbots are designed to “predict the most likely next token” or “word” in a sentence.
However, he noted two key traits of scientists. The first is that scientists who make major breakthroughs are often contrarian and question what others are saying.
“The scientist is not trying to predict the most likely next word. He’s trying to predict this very novel thing that’s actually surprisingly unlikely, but actually is true,” Wolf said.
The Hugging Face co-founder has been thinking about this topic for the last few months. His interest was sparked after he read an essay penned by Anthropic’s Amodei, who posited that “AI-enabled biology and medicine will allow us to compress the progress that human biologists would have achieved over the next 50-100 years into 5-10 years.”
That got Wolf thinking about the state of AI and how this won’t be possible, in his view, with the current crop of models.
Wolf said that these chatbots and tools will likely be used as a sort of “co-pilot for a scientist” where they are used for research to help the human generate new ideas.
To some extent, this has been happening already. Google DeepMind’s AlphaFold product has helped to analyze protein structures which the company has promised could aid scientists in discovering new drugs.
But there are some new startups that are hoping to take AI one step further into being able to make scientific breakthroughs, including Lila Sciences and FutureHouse.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Limited at Hsinchu Science Park.
Annabelle Chih | Getty Images News | Getty Images
Taiwan will not accept Washington’s proposal to locally manufacture half the chips it currently supplies to the U.S., the island’s top trade negotiator said.
Speaking to reporters, Cheng Li-chiun, also the country’s vice premier, said on Wednesday that the proposal for a “50-50” split in semiconductor production was not even discussed, as she returned from trade talks in the U.S., according to Taiwan’s Central News Agency.
Cheng said the talks were focused on lowering tariff rates, securing exemptions from tariff stacking — additional duties — and reducing levies on Taiwanese exports. Taiwan currently faces a “reciprocal” tariff rate of 20%.
Washington has held discussions with Taipei about the “50-50” split in semiconductor production, which would cut American reliance on Taiwan, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last weekend in an interview to NewsNation, adding that currently 95% of the U.S. demand was met via chips produced within Taiwan.
“My objective, and this administration’s objective, is to get chip manufacturing significantly onshored — we need to make our own chips,” Lutnick said. “The idea that I pitched [Taiwan] was, let’s get to 50-50. We’re producing half, and you’re producing half.”
U.S. President Donald Trump had also taken aim at the island’s dominance in chips earlier this year, accusing it of “stealing” the U.S.’ chip business.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comments.
Lutnick’s proposal has been condemned by Taiwan’s politicians, with Eric Chu, chairman of the island’s principal opposition party Kuomintang, calling it “an act of exploitation and plunder,” according to the Central News Agency report.
“No one can sell out Taiwan or TSMC, and no one can undermine Taiwan’s silicon shield,” Chu said, referring to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world’s leader in advanced chip manufacturing.
Taiwan’s critical position in global chips production is believed to have assured the island nation’s defense against direct military action from China, often referred to as the “Silicon Shield” theory.
In his NewsNation interview, Lutnick downplayed the “Silicon Shield,” arguing that Taiwan would be safer with more balanced chip production between Washington and Taipei. Beijing views the democratically governed island of Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to reclaim it by force if necessary, while Taipei rejects those claims.
Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Huang Kuo-chang reportedly called Lutnick’s proposal an attempt to “hollow out the foundations of Taiwan’s technology sector.”