“I am proud to be Scottish. I don’t want them here.”
Standing on the balcony of his flat in Glasgow, George drapes the saltire Scottish flag as he explains his anti-immigration stance.
“We can’t afford to keep all these people coming in,” he says. “There’s too many people coming in.”
George, who lives on the Wyndford estate in Glasgow’s Maryhill, is not alone.
Warning: This report contains material some may find offensive.
Image: ‘There’s too many people coming in,’ says George from Glasgow
Streets across the city are filling with white and blue flags hanging from lampposts.
Immigration has not been centre stage in Scottish politics for many years – but the mood appears to be shifting.
Glasgow is the frontline of the UK’s immigration system, with more arrivals than anywhere else.
With community tensions spiking and accommodation costs rising to £4.5m a month, the city’s leaders are demanding a pause on relocations.
Glasgow’s financial burden spirals
In 1999, the city signed up to the UK’s “dispersal” system, which saw asylum seekers relocated by the Home Office in exchange for cash.
It was a bygone era, when Glasgow’s high-rise housing was in abundance and modern pressures were less acute.
The landscape has changed drastically, with many tower blocks flattened amid regeneration.
Once an asylum seeker is given the right to stay in the UK, they become a refugee and switch from being the responsibility of the Home Office to the local authority.
While immigration is controlled by Westminster, housing and healthcare are among the issues dealt with by the Scottish government.
Scotland’s homelessness legislation means councils must house anyone without a home.
It is a more generous policy than in England, where usually only those with “priority need” are given a roof over their head.
It is suggested the Scottish policy is drawing people to Glasgow at the same time the Home Office is “mass processing” a backlog of asylum cases and granting some the right to stay in the UK.
Latest figures show Glasgow was the local authority with the highest proportion of housed asylum seekers at 59 per 10,000 inhabitants (a total of 3,716).
City officials argue the issues are coming together to create a crisis, with the financial burden spiralling.
Councillors are pleading for more financial assistance from Westminster, but so far that has not been forthcoming.
Image: Streets across Glasgow are filling with flags hanging from lampposts
‘We will be the underdogs’
Scotland has traditionally been seen as a left-leaning nation where inward migration is welcomed.
The tourism industry relies heavily on people coming to work, and it is no secret that Brexit caused issues for hospitality staffing.
The issue has not dominated the public conversation in Scotland, but polls suggest, for the first time in a long while, it is a rising concern.
It is still not a priority for most Scots – but it is beginning to seep into the narrative.
Up the road from where George lives in Maryhill, we come across an 84-year-old woman who asks us not to show her face on camera.
Image: This woman claimed people from Glasgow ‘will be the underdogs’
Immigration is “getting out of control”, she says.
“It looks like they are going to overspill us,” she says. “We will be the underdogs.”
When challenged on her evidence for her claims, she responds: “I don’t have any evidence”.
Asked what she means by “they”, she says: “All the ones that are coming in, especially Muslims.”
She said she was not racist but was instead saying “just truth” and “my opinion”.
We meet Audrey Cameron, a mother whose children have additional learning needs.
She told me: “I’ve got an older son who lives with me who can’t get a house, but yet you come in to this country, and you get a house no bother. I know people say they don’t, but they do.
Image: Glasgow does not have the infrastructure to deal with asylum seekers, says Audrey Cameron
“There is more black and every other colour than there is white.”
When challenged that others may think a multicultural society is something that should be welcomed, Ms Cameron says: “We don’t have the infrastructure for it.
“We don’t have the housing. Even trying to get a doctor’s appointment is a nightmare. There has to be a limit.
“There are too many immigrants in this area. They are not spread out. They are all congregated.”
‘They are not stealing your jobs’
Andy Sirel, a leading immigration lawyer and co-founder of Just Right Scotland, tells Sky News that misinformation is fuelling the public discourse and politicians need to act.
Image: There are misconceptions about the support for asylum seekers, says immigration lawyer Andy Sirel
He says: “When a person is in the United Kingdom, they are not allowed to work, they are not allowed to claim benefits, they are not stealing your jobs.
“If they are in a hotel, which they don’t want to be in, they are on £9 a week. It is simply not true the narrative that is being put out.
“The issue is being used as a scapegoat by various political actors.
“It is predicated on immigration, or higher levels of immigration, being why the standard of living has dropped and the reason public services are suffering, which is simply not the case.”
Image: Accommodation costs for asylum seekers in Glasgow have risen to £4.5m a month
The town with deep divides over immigration
Falkirk is a mid-size town with a population of approximately 150,000, around 30 miles from Glasgow city centre. It has become a flashpoint for protest between pro and anti-immigration groups.
A dilapidated and crumbling old hotel, the Cladhan, is home to dozens of mostly men in their 20s, 30s and 40s awaiting their asylum cases being heard.
The Home Office pays for accommodation, meals and financial allowances for asylum seekers, given the rules banning them seeking employment.
Image: Tensions over the asylum hotel in Falkirk have been rising
A brick was thrown through a window recently in an attack Scotland’s First Minister John Swinney branded “despicable”.
During a rally outside the hotel, Sky News filmed one man performing a Nazi salute, while a banner was held up saying “Kill ‘Em All, Let God Sort ‘Em Out”.
Others, from the community group Falkirk For All, chanted “refugees are welcome here”.
“We are standing up against the scapegoating of refugees. [We are] standing up against racism,” Georgia Henderson from the group said.
“We have been shocked by what we saw. We are highly motivated to turn up and protect the people of the hotel.”
Dr Teresa Piacentini, an expert in migration from Glasgow University, said many people are misinformed when discussing this issue.
She said: “Claiming asylum is a right. To claim asylum is not to do something illegal. You have a legal entitlement to claim asylum.
“People that are being held in the asylum hotels have claimed asylum so are exercising a right to be here. And while their asylum claim is being processed, they are here legally.
“Illegal has become a convenient catch-all phrase that doesn’t actually reveal the complexity and nuance behind it.”
Tensions in Falkirk have been heightened since a former resident of the asylum hotel raped a 15-year-old girl in the town.
Asylum seeker Sadeq Nikzad, 29, was jailed for nine years in June.
We spoke to two men who are currently living in the hotel after being bussed up to Falkirk from London.
Nechirvan, 31, arrived in March 2024 after crossing the English Channel.
He says he fled Iraq and had been living in Europe, mostly Germany, for 10 years before making the journey to the UK.
He claims he “couldn’t stay” on the continent any more because “they are deporting people”.
Asked whether he understands the anger from some that it is mostly young men entering on small boats, he says: “We are not safe in our country.
“It is not easy. Not easy for family to cross the water. That’s why they not bring the family.”
Nechirvan describes sleepless nights as protests ramp up outside the asylum hotel.
Image: Nechirvan says he fled Iraq and had been living in Europe before arriving in the UK
Another asylum seeker living in Falkirk, who did not want to be identified, says he came to the UK from West Africa.
In response to rising tensions, he says: “I don’t blame anybody. People have some valid reasons to feel angry but what is important is that we are all human beings.”
Image: This asylum seeker from West Africa says he can understand the concerns of some
“You cannot put everyone in one category, classing everyone as racist,” he adds.
“What I know is people have valid reasons, but not everyone in the hotel is bad. Some of the people if you listen to what they went through, you’d sympathise with them.
“You may have your own reasons for doing what you are doing but let’s just live peacefully.”
Image: Anti-migration protesters outside the Cladhan hotel in Falkirk
The Home Office told Sky News it is attempting to reduce the number of people in hotels.
A spokesman said: “This government inherited a broken asylum and immigration system. We are taking practical steps to turn that chaos around – including doubling asylum decision-making to clear the backlog left by the previous government and reducing the number of people in hotels by 6,000 in the first half of 2025.
“We continue to work with local councils, NGOs and other stakeholders to ensure any necessary assistance is provided for those individuals who are granted refugee status.”
This scathing report goes a long way to answer the UK COVID-19 Inquiry’s critics, who have consistently attacked it as a costly waste of time.
They tried to undermine inquiry chair Lady Hallet’s attempt to understand what went wrong and how we might do better, and portray it as a lame exercise that would achieve very little.
Well, we now know that Boris Johnson’s “toxic and chaotic” government could well have prevented at least 23,000 deaths had they acted sooner and with greater urgency.
The response was “too little, too late”. And nobody in power truly understood the scale of the emerging threat or the urgency of the response it required.
The grieving families who lost loved ones in the pandemic want answers. They want names. And they want accountability.
The publication of the report into Module 2 of the inquiry will bring them no comfort, it may even cause them more distress.
But it will bring them closer to understanding why the UK’s response to this unprecedented health crisis was so poor.
Image: Copies of the UK COVID-19 Inquiry’s findings into decisions made by former prime minister Boris Johnson and his advisers. Pic: PA
We can easily identify the “advisers and ministers whose alleged rule breaking caused huge distress and undermined public confidence”.
And we know who was in charge of the Department of Health and Social Care as it misled the public by giving the impression that the UK was well prepared for the pandemic when it clearly was not.
All four UK governments failed to appreciate the scale of the threat posed by COVID-19 or the urgency of the response the pandemic required, a damning report published on Thursday has claimed.
Baroness Heather Hallett, the chair of the inquiry, described the response to the pandemic as “too little, too late”.
Tens of thousands of lives could have been saved during the first wave of COVID-19 had a mandatory lockdown been introduced a week earlier, the inquiry also found.
Noting how a “lack of urgency” made a mandatory lockdown “inevitable”, the report references modelling data to claim there could have been 23,000 fewer deaths during the first wave in England had it been introduced a week earlier.
The UK government first introduced advisory restrictions on 16 March 2020, including self-isolation, household quarantine and social distancing.
Had these measures been introduced sooner, the report states, the mandatory lockdown which followed from 23 March might not have been necessary at all.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:54
All four UK govts ‘failed to appreciate’ scale of pandemic
COVID-19 first emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan at the end of 2019, and as it developed into a worldwide pandemic, the UK went in and out of unprecedented lockdown measures for two years starting from March 2020.
More on Covid Inquiry
Related Topics:
Lady Hallett admitted in her summary that politicians in the government and devolved administrations were forced to make decisions where “there was often no right answer or good outcome”.
“Nonetheless,” she said, “I can summarise my findings of the response as ‘too little, too late'”.
Report goes long way to answer inquiry’s critics
This scathing report goes a long way to answer the Covid 19 Inquiry’s critics who have consistently attacked it as a costly waste of time.
They tried to undermine Lady Hallet’s attempt to understand what went wrong and how we might do better as a lame exercise that would achieve very little.
Well, we now know that Boris Johnson’s “toxic and chaotic” government could well have prevented at least 23,000 deaths had they acted sooner and with greater urgency.
The response was “too little, too late”. And that nobody in power truly understood the scale of the emerging threat or the urgency of the response it required.
The grieving families who lost loved ones in the pandemic want answers. They want names. And they want accountability.
But that is beyond the remit of this Inquiry.
The publication of the report into Module 2 will bring them no comfort, it may even cause them more distress but it will bring them closer to understanding why the UK’s response to this unprecedented health crisis was so poor.
And we can easily identify the “advisors and ministers whose alleged rule breaking caused huge distress and undermined public confidence”.
Or who was in charge of the Department of Health and Social Care, as it misled the public by giving the impression that the UK was well prepared for the pandemic when it clearly was not.
‘Toxic culture’ at the heart of UK government
The report said there was “a toxic and chaotic culture” at the heart of the UK government during the pandemic.
The inquiry heard evidence about the “destabilising behaviour of a number of individuals” – including former No 10 adviser Dominic Cummings.
It said that by failing to tackle this chaotic culture – “and, at times, actively encouraging it” – former PM Boris Johnson “reinforced a culture in which the loudest voices prevailed and the views of other colleagues, particularly women, often went ignored, to the detriment of good decision-making”.
‘Misleading assurances’
The inquiry found all four governments in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland failed to understand the urgency of response the pandemic demanded in the early part of 2020.
The report reads: “This was compounded, in part, by misleading assurances from the Department of Health and Social Care and the widely held view that the UK was well prepared for a pandemic.”
The report notes how the UK government took a “high risk” when it significantly eased restrictions in England in July 2020 – “despite scientific advisers’ concerns about the public health risks of doing so”.
Lady Hallett has made 19 key recommendations which, if followed, she believes will better protect the UK in any future pandemic and improve decision-making in a crisis.
Repeated failings ‘inexcusable’
In a statement following the publication of Thursday’s report, Lady Hallett said there was a “serious failure” by all four governments to appreciate the level of “risk and calamity” facing the UK.
She said: “The tempo of the response should have been increased. It was not. February 2020 was a lost month.”
Lady Hallett said the inquiry does not advocate for national lockdowns, which she said should have been avoided if at all possible.
She said: “But to avoid them, governments must take timely and decisive action to control a spreading virus. The four governments of the UK did not.”
Lady Hallett said none of the governments were adequately prepared for the challenges and risks that a lockdown presented, and that many of the same failings were repeated later in 2020, which she said was “inexcusable”.
She added: “Each government had ample warning that the prevalence of the virus was increasing and would continue to do so into the winter months. Yet again, there was a failure to take timely and effective action.”
Fresh yellow weather warnings for ice have been issued for many areas of the UK, as some areas are threatened with blizzard conditions on Thursday.
An amber warning for snow – covering northeast England, including Scarborough, Whitby and parts south of Middlesbrough – is in force until 9pm on Thursday.
The Met Office said there could be “significant snow accumulations” over the North York Moors and parts of the Yorkshire Wolds with up to 25cm (10ins) on hills above 100m (330ft).
“Gusty winds, giving occasional blizzard conditions, and perhaps a few lightning strikes, may accompany some of the showers, posing as additional hazards,” the warning added.
Some A-roads in North Yorkshire were reported to be “gridlocked”, according to Shingi Mararike, Sky News’ North of England correspondent, but he added gritters are out to deal with the bad weather.
Image: A car overturns on the A19 near Sunderland. Pic: PA
Image: The Glenshane Pass in County Londonderry has been coated in snow. Pic: PA
Image: Snowy conditions near Skipsea in the the East Riding of Yorkshire. Pic: PA
Snow ploughs have been hard at work on the North York Moors and a thick coat of snow is covering the A169 between Pickering and Whitby.
More on Uk Weather
Related Topics:
Dozens of schools have been closed in North Yorkshire and Scotland.
Image: Amber warning for snow in parts of northeast England and south of Middlesbrough until 9pm on Thursday. Pic: Met Office
A number of yellow warnings are also in force for snow and/or ice across large parts of Britain.
In many of the warnings issued by the Met Office, there are concerns that where “showers persist and/or snow partially thaws and then refreezes overnight, this will bring a risk of ice”.
Image: Weather warnings in the UK for snow and ice across various regions on Thursday (left) and ice on Friday (right). Pic: Met Office
Jo Wheeler, Sky’s weather presenter, said clear skies will allow temperatures to tumble again as Thursday night approaches, “with an early and severe frost expected, and the associated risk of icy stretches on untreated roads and pavements”.
Coldest night so far
Overnight Wednesday into Thursday was the coldest of the season so far, according to the Met Office.
Temperatures dropped as low as -6.6C (20F) in Benson, Oxfordshire. There were two -6.4C (20F) temperatures recorded in Wales (in Sennybrigde) and in Scotland (Dundreggan).
While in Northern Ireland it fell to -2.8C (27F) in Altnahinch Filters.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
As well as the one amber weather warning covering parts of the UK, there are two amber health alerts in place in three areas of England from the UK’s Health Security Agency.
An amber health alert is designed to prepare health services, including for the potential for a rise in deaths among the over-65s and people with health conditions.
The alerts are in effect in North East and North West England, along with the Yorkshire and the Humber region until 8am on 22 November.
Yellow cold-health alerts are in place for the rest of England and also expire at the same point.
Walk like a penguin
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC) is recommending that people should walk like penguins to avoid dangerous slips and trips on icy surfaces.
The technique, which went viral in previous winters, is back for 2025 as part of the health board’s winter campaign.
Facebook
This content is provided by Facebook, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Facebook cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Facebook cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Facebook cookies for this session only.
Laura Halcrow, falls prevention lead at NHSGGC, said: “It might look funny, but waddling really works. A slip on ice can cause painful injuries and even hospital stays, especially for older people.”
Turning wet and windy
Sky’s weather presenter, Jo Wheeler, adds that the forecast is set to change this weekend.
“We’ll trade the cold sunshine and wintry showers for wet and windy conditions with rain turning heavy as it crosses the country on Saturday.”
“The British weather, fickle as always, looks like delivering a brief change to this milder westerly flow followed by an equally quick change back to a chilly northerly flow.”