Connect with us

Published

on

Before and since taking power, the prime minister has set out lists of milestones, missions, targets and pledges – things he wants the country to achieve under his leadership.

We have broken down some that have been repeated most consistently and started tracking them.

They have been split into two groups – things that relate to specific policy areas, and things that relate to money. Every time the data is updated, our charts will update.

How we are measuring progress

Illegal migration: Labour’s promise – “smash” people smuggling gangs and reduce Channel crossing numbers

This is one of the easier ones to track as the Home Office publishes daily updates on the number of people arriving in the UK on small boats.

Historically, the numbers have tended to be highest in the summer and lower again at times when the weather is not so good.

We are showing a cumulative annual total so you can compare where we are in the current year against where we were at the same point in previous years.

Healthcare: Labour’s promise – no more than 8% of patients will wait longer than 18 weeks for elective treatment

This target only refers to England, because healthcare is a devolved power that the national governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are responsible for delivering in their countries.

NHS England publishes monthly data on waits for elective care, dating back almost 20 years.

There was a period in the 2010s when this target was met consistently. But following that, wait times grew gradually but steadily for several years, and then rapidly following the COVID pandemic.

Despite what looks like limited movement on the chart so far, the Health Foundation say the government are currently on track with delivering this ambitious target. They add that serious effort will need to be sustained to get it over the line.

Housebuilding: Labour’s promise – build 1.5 million homes by the time of the next election

This target also only applies to England. It’s equivalent to an average of 300,000 per year, although Labour have always said that delivery will not be linear and they expect to make up a shortfall in their last couple of years in power.

The official data for the number of new homes added – taking into account any that have been demolished or are no longer habitable, and any converted (for example from commercial to residential) – is only published once a year, usually in about November, referring to the previous financial year.

There is data published more regularly, however, on the number of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) granted. Because each new home needs to be issued an EPC, the number of EPCs granted and houses built usually match each other quite closely.

In our chart, we use EPCs as a representative measure to forecast how many homes have been built, which is replaced by official data when that becomes available.

According to that, about 200,000 houses were added during Labour’s first year in power. That means they will need to average 325,000 for the remaining four years to deliver on their target.

Clean power: Labour’s promise – at least 95% of energy from low carbon sources by 2030

We are measuring this pledge using data from the National Energy System Operator, an independent public body that plans and manages the energy network. It tells us what proportion of energy used in Great Britain comes from various sources, including low-carbon options like wind, solar and nuclear.

The government say that when it judges whether it has achieved its target, it will adjust for the weather, meaning the threshold may actually be slightly higher or lower than 95% depending on how sunny or windy it is at the time.

It has not confirmed exactly how it is going to do that, however, so we are just publishing the raw figures, consolidating data published every half-hour into a monthly average.

The Climate Change Committee, an independent body that advises government on tackling climate change, say the target is possible but will be difficult to achieve, and there is “little room for error”.

Violent crime: Labour’s promise – halve serious violent crime, including knife crime and violence against women and girls (VAWG), within 10 years

This is the least well fleshed out of the policy targets. The government has said a few times that it intends to halve knife crime and VAWG within a decade, but there are a few different ways of measuring each of these and more than a year after coming to power, the government has still not confirmed which it is going to use.

We do know that the pledge refers only to England and Wales, because the justice system in Scotland and Northern Ireland is devolved.

At the moment, we are using “police recorded crime” data published by the Home Office. We add together all crimes categorised as “violence against the person”, ranging from common assault to murder, plus sexual offences and robbery.

The Crime Survey of England and Wales is another source that measures people’s experience of crime, published by the ONS.

The ONS say that there is no single definition of what constitutes “violent crime”, though. They are working with the Home Office to come up with one, so we may switch to using that measure when it has worked it out.

Disposable income: Labour’s promise – raise living standards in every part of the United Kingdom

This is the least ambitious of Labour’s targets. Other than the recent Conservative government of 2019-2024, which had to adapt to a global pandemic and Britain’s exit from the EU, every parliament in recorded British history has overseen an improvement in living standards.

We measure this by looking at real household disposable income per person – how much each of us has to spend each month after paying taxes.

The figures published by the ONS are adjusted for inflation and seasonal fluctuations. Our methodology is similar to what thinktanks like the Institute for Fiscal Studies or the Resolution Foundation use, taking the figure closest in date to each election and seeing how things change from there.

Given that the target itself is unambitious, we wanted to be able to benchmark the improvements under this government with others at the same point in their parliamentary terms, so that’s what our chart does.

Personal tax: Labour’s promise – we will not increase taxes on working people

More specifically, the government has said it will not raise the current rates of national insurance, income tax or VAT, despite economists warning that taxes will have to rise to bring down government borrowing.

Even if these personal tax rates do stay the same, they do not tell the whole story by themselves.

The thresholds at which we start paying tax, and then start paying higher-rate tax, are set to be frozen until April 2028. They have already been frozen since April 2021.

That means that, as inflation leads to wage increases, we end up paying more tax on a higher proportion of our earnings. This process is known as fiscal drag.

Read more: What key budget terms mean

What that all means is that the effective tax rate – the percentage of your wages that are paid in tax – is set to rise over the next few years, almost by stealth. That’s what we are tracking.

We are looking at what average wages in the UK are each month, and working out how much someone earning that amount would need to pay in income tax and national insurance.

Keep inflation low: Labour’s promise – bring down food prices and the cost of energy and continue to target stable inflation of 2%

This one is a bit more straightforward again. The ONS publishes monthly figures on inflation, which explain how prices have risen over the previous 12 months across a huge range of goods and services that are relevant to our lives.

These figures are the best way of quantifying the cost of living crisis. They soared to their highest rates in more than 40 years in October 2022, before falling again – close to the 2% Bank of England target – under the final months of the previous government.

Our tracker allows you to see exactly what’s happened under Starmer’s premiership, in detail, and also includes the historical rates for context.

Controlling the tax burden: Labour’s promise – we will ensure taxes on working people are kept as low as possible

We have already spoken about tax on earnings. But that does not take into account things like VAT and stamp duty, as well as things like corporation tax, which we do not pay directly.

The best measure for this is the tax burden, which measures all the revenue received by the government in a given year and benchmarks it against GDP – the total value of all goods and services produced in the UK.

This means the tax burden is a measure of how much of the country’s economic output is being taken in tax, which makes it the best way to make international and historical comparisons.

Labour’s 2024 manifesto accused the Conservatives of raising the tax burden to a 70-year high. We use figures from the Office for Budget Responsibility to see whether Labour improve on that or takes it higher still.

Economic growth: Labour’s promise – secure the highest sustained growth in the G7

The G7 is a group of seven countries – the UK, the US, Germany, France, Italy, Japan and Canada (as well as the EU) – that co-ordinate on global economic policy and international challenges. Economic growth refers to the change in GDP from one period to the next.

Labour have claimed they have already achieved this target, but that’s based only on the first six months of this year. We are looking at figures over a rolling one-year period, so each time you come back to this page, it will have the latest annual numbers.

Other than a period during the COVID recovery, the last time the UK led on this metric for a sustained period was in 2014. The US and Canada have exchanged the lead since 2023.

Our figures come from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a group of mostly advanced economies that collects and standardises international data.

Starmer economy tracker and Starmer policy tracker tools built by Przemyslaw Pluta, Sky News lead data engineer.


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open-source information. Through multimedia storytelling, we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Continue Reading

Politics

Reeves fighting claims she ‘lied’ about deficit – as Starmer set to back her budget

Published

on

By

Reeves fighting claims she 'lied' about deficit - as Starmer set to back her budget

Rachel Reeves is fighting claims that she “lied” to the public about the state of the finances in the run-up to last Wednesday’s budget – in which she raised £26bn in taxes.

It follows a letter published by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the official watchdog which draws up forecasts for the Treasury, published on Friday.

In it, OBR chair Richard Hughes (who is already under fire for the leak of the budget measures) said he’d taken the unusual step of revealing the forecasts it had submitted to Rachel Reeves in the 10 weeks before the budget, and which is normally shrouded in secrecy.

The OBR sent this table revealing its timings and outcomes of the fiscal forecasts reported to the Treasury
Image:
The OBR sent this table revealing its timings and outcomes of the fiscal forecasts reported to the Treasury

Sir Keir Starmer congratulates Rachel Reeves after the budget
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer congratulates Rachel Reeves after the budget

The letter reveals this timeline, which has plunged the chancellor into trouble:

17 September – first forecast

At this point, it was already known that the UK’s growth forecast would be downgraded. The chancellor was told that the “increases in real wages and inflation” would offset the impact of the downgrade. The deficit forecast by the end of the parliament was £2.5bn.

20 October – second forecast

More on Budget 2025

By this point, that deficit had turned into a small surplus of £2.1bn – i.e. the productivity downgrade has been wiped out and “both of the government’s fiscal targets were on course to be met”.

31 October – third forecast

The final one before the Treasury put forward its measures. The finances were now net positive with a £4.2bn surplus.

But the accusation is that Rachel Reeves was presenting an entirely different picture – that she had a significant black hole which needed to be filled.

13 October

Ms Reeves tells Sky’s deputy political editor Sam Coates the productivity downgrade has been challenging but added: “I won’t duck those challenges. Of course we’re looking at tax and spending.”

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

27 October

With the Treasury now aware the deficit had been wiped out, the Financial Times was briefed about a “£20bn hit to public finances.”

4 November

Ms Reeves gave a dawn news conference in Downing Street, setting the stage for tax rises. She says she wants people “to understand the circumstances we are facing… productivity performance is weaker than previously thought”, adding that “we will all have to contribute”.

10 November

Ms Reeves tells BBC 5Live that sticking to Labour’s promises not to raise taxes would require “things like deep cuts in capital spending”. The stage seemed set for the nuclear option – the first income tax rise in decades.

13 November

After headlines about a plot to oust Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the Financial Times reported that the chancellor had dropped plans to raise income tax because of improved forecasts [which we now know hadn’t changed since 31 October], putting the black hole closer to £20bn than £30bn.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Budget 2025: ‘It’s sickening’

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘You’ve broken a manifesto pledge, haven’t you?’

The prime minister’s spokesperson has insisted Ms Reeves did not mislead voters and set out her choices, and the reasons for them, at the budget.

But the issue has had enormous cut-through, with newspapers giving it top billing.

The Sun’s Saturday front page headline – “Chancer of the Exchequer – fury at Reeves ‘lies’ over £30bn black hole” – will not have been pleasant reading for ministers.

She now has questions to answer about the chaotic run-up to the budget – of briefing and counter-briefing, which critics say now makes little sense.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said on Saturday: “We have learned that the chancellor misrepresented the OBR’s forecasts. She sold her ‘Benefits Street’ budget on a lie. Honesty matters… she has to go.”

Economist Paul Johnson, former director of the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), told The Times the chancellor’s 4 November news briefing “probably was misleading. It was clearly intended to have an impact and confirm what independent forecasters like [the National Institute of Economic and Social Research] and the IFS had been saying”.

“It was designed to confirm a narrative that there was a fiscal hole that needed to be filled with significant tax rises. In fact, as she knew at the time, no such hole existed.”

Read more on budget fallout:
Reeves accused over forecasts
Hospitality ‘needs a lifeline’

Ms Reeves is doing a round of morning interviews on Sunday in which she’ll be grilled over which of her budget measures will generate economic growth (which the government claimed was its number one priority), why they have been unable to tackle rising welfare spending and now about why markets and voters were left confused by dire warnings.

She may claim that she never personally said there was a specific £30bn black hole or that the extra headroom generated by the tax rises will ensure she does not have to come back for more next year.

In an interview with The Saturday’s Guardian, Ms Reeves said she had “chosen to protect public spending” on schools and hospitals in the budget.

She confirmed an income tax rise had been looked at, and insisted that OBR forecasts “move around” after the Treasury has submitted its planned measures. There are plenty more questions to come.

Meanwhile, Sir Keir will use a speech on Monday to support Ms Reeves’ budget decisions and set out his long-term growth plans.

He will praise the budget for bearing down on the cost of living, ensuring economic stability through greater headroom, lower inflation and a commitment to fiscal rules, and protecting investment and public services.

Sir Keir will say “economic growth is beating the forecasts”, but that the government must go “further and faster” to encourage it.

Continue Reading

Politics

Lammy says justice reforms will reduce victims’ suffering – as right to jury trial set to go in some cases

Published

on

By

Lammy says justice reforms will reduce victims' suffering - as right to jury trial set to go in some cases

Victims will be put “front and centre” in reforms to be announced this week, the justice secretary has said, amid reports jury trials will be scrapped in some cases.

Sky News understands ministers have already been briefed on the changes, which would see a judge decide most cases on their own except for murder, rape or manslaughter – or those in the “public interest”.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said the reforms would speed up justice and save victims from “years of torment and delay”.

Nearly 80,000 cases are currently waiting to be heard in crown courts, but a bid to limit the right to jury trial is likely to be divisive.

Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said Mr Lammy should “pull his finger out” to cut the backlog rather than “depriving British citizens of ancient liberties”.

“The right to be tried by our peers has existed for more than 800 years – it is not to be casually discarded when the spreadsheets turn red,” said Mr Jenrick.

Full details are expected in the coming days, but in a statement today Mr Lammy said he had “inherited a courts emergency; a justice system pushed to the brink”.

More on David Lammy

“We will not allow victims to suffer the way they did under the last government, we must put victims front and centre of the justice system,” he added.

Mr Lammy said thousands of lives were on hold due to the case backlog, a “rape victim being told their case won’t come before a court until 2029. A mother who has lost a child at the hands of a dangerous driver, waiting to see justice done”.

He said he wanted a system that “finally gives brave survivors the justice they deserve”.

The justice secretary will reportedly go further than a review recommended. Pic: PA
Image:
The justice secretary will reportedly go further than a review recommended. Pic: PA

.However, it’s been reported Mr Lammy will go further than a review conducted by Sir Brian Leveson.

The retired judge backed the move for juries only in the most serious cases, but also proposed some lesser offences could go to a new intermediate court where a judge would be joined by two lay magistrates.

The Times said Mr Lammy had suggested in an internal memo he would remove the lay element from many serious offences that carry sentences of up to five years.

There are fears such a move could increase miscarriages of justice and racial discrimination.

Read more from Sky News:
Reeves fighting ‘lie’ claims as Starmer set to back budget
Your Party co-founder refuses to enter conference hall

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Work and pensions secretary speaks to Sky about justice reforms

Speaking to Sky News’ Politics Hub programme this week, work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden did not deny the changes were on the way.

The MoJ has laid the ground for the reforms by saying the court backlog could hit 100,000 by 2028 under the current system.

It said just 3% of cases are currently decided by a jury, with more than 90% already dealt with by magistrates alone.

Continue Reading

Politics

Your Party votes to be led by members rather than single MP – avoiding Corbyn-Sultana battle

Published

on

By

Your Party votes to be led by members rather than single MP - avoiding Corbyn-Sultana battle

Your Party will be led by its members rather than a single MP, avoiding a battle between its two co-founders, Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana.

Members have voted for a collective leadership model rather than a single leadership model, by a margin of 51.6% to 48.4%.

There was a big cheer as the result was announced to delegates gathered in Liverpool for the new movement’s annual founding conference.

Your Party has been marred by factionalism between the two figureheads and had a single leadership model been picked, a big battle for the top job was expected.

But many members told Sky News at the conference that because of the squabbling, they want Your Party to be led by the people rather than “personality icons”.

Collective leadership will see ordinary members who are not MPs elected to senior positions on a Central Executive Committee (CEC), which will decide on party strategy and organisation.

Three key leadership roles will be the Chair, Vice Chair, and Spokesperson, who will be elected by February.

More from Politics

However MPs could become de-facto leaders, as they will be able to sit in the public office holder section of the executive committee.

They must be elected in a one on one vote, with four positions understood to be available.

A Your Party spokesperson said: “This vote shows that we really are doing politics differently: from the bottom-up, not the top-down.

“In Westminster, we have a professional political class increasingly disconnected from ordinary people, serving corporations and billionaires instead of the communities they are supposed to represent.

“With a truly member-led party, we will offer something different: democratic, grassroots, accountable.”

However one ally of Jeremy Corbyn told Sky News: “People have voted against utilising the biggest asset the party had – Jeremy.”

Your Party members have also voted to allow membership of other parties. Current rules don’t permit dual membership, but this sparked a major row on the eve of conference as it emerged figures from the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) had been expelled.

Ms Sultana, who supports dual membership, branded this a “witch hunt” orchestrated by “nameless bureaucrats” close to Mr Corbyn and refused to enter the conference hall on day one.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the latest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

Trending