Every week, the Money blog team answers a reader’s financial dilemma or consumer problem – email yours to moneyblog@sky.uk. Today’s is…
A neighbour has borrowed more than £1,000 from me with the promise to pay me back by the end of the month. Nothing has been forthcoming. I’ve sent her texts asking for her to let me know when she is putting it in to my account… no answer at all. What are my legal options? Tony, via comments box
Thanks for your message, Tony – I wish I had a neighbour as generous as you.
From what you describe, there was an oral agreement here, which isn’t the best grounding to get your money back.
The neighbour might argue that there were no particular payment terms (so that the loan is not due by the end of the month) or even that there was no loan at all (that the money was instead a gift).
It would then be up to the court to decide on the evidence whether a loan existed and what its terms were.
I spoke to solicitor Alex Kennedy, a dispute resolution expert at Gannons, to get some firm guidance for you.
“Evidence of messages, bank payments etc are so important,” he says.
“If there are no documents at all, the person who is owed the money could still present their case, it is just the trial judge would be weighing their witness evidence against that of the borrower.”
Kennedy says the most obvious legal route now is to send a formal letter before action to your neighbour, setting out:
The amount owed;
The basis of the debt (ie, the loan made and her agreement to repay by the end of the month);
What steps you have already taken to request payment;
A clear deadline (usually 14 days) for repayment before you take legal action.
This can be done by you or a solicitor and could well prompt your neighbour to cough up.
“Tony will need to bear in mind whether the relatively small value of the loan means that instructing a solicitor is a disproportionate expense, especially given that it is unusual to recover legal costs in respect of a small claim,” Kennedy says.
“If the cost of a solicitor is considered to be excessive, we would still recommend that the person who is owed the money drafts a letter before action themselves.”
If your neighbour is still not budging, there’s the option to issue a claim online via the Money Claim Online service or through the local county court.
The claim fee depends on the size of the debt (for £1,000-£1,500 it is currently £70 if issued online).
If successful, you will obtain a county court judgment.
Kennedy says your reader can enforce the judgment in several ways, including:
Instructing bailiffs (county court or high court enforcement officers);
Obtaining an attachment of earnings order (if she is employed);
A charging order against property (if she owns her home).
“Interest and some legal costs can be claimed as part of proceedings, but as I have set out above, they may be limited given the value of the debt,” Kennedy says.
Of course, only you can decide whether taking any of these steps against someone you’ll be seeing all the time is the right way to go.
Good luck with it!
This feature is not intended as financial advice – the aim is to give an overview of the things you should think about.
Up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700 in compensation due to car loan mis-selling, the financial services regulator has said.
Nearly half (44%) of all car loan agreements made between April 2007 and November 2024 could be eligible for payouts, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.
Those eligible for the compensation will have had a loan where the broker received commission from a lender.
Lenders broke the law by not sharing this fact with consumers, the FCA said, and customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.
A scheme is seen by the FCA as the best outcome for consumers and lenders, as it avoids the courts and the Financial Ombudsman Service, therefore minimising delay, uncertainty and administration costs.
The scheme will be funded by the dozens of lenders involved in the loans, and cost about £8.2bn, on the lower end of expectations, which had been expected to reach as much as £18bn.
The figure was reached by estimating that 85% of eligible applicants will take part in the scheme.
More from Money
What if you think you’re eligible?
Anyone who believes they have been impacted should contact their lender and has a year to do so. Compensation will begin to be paid in 2026, with an exact timeline yet to be worked out.
The FCA said it would move “as quickly as we can”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:21
Payouts due after motor finance scandal
People who have already complained do not need to take action. Complaints about approximately four million loan agreements have already been received.
There’s no need to contact a solicitor or claims management firm, the FCA said, as it aimed for the scheme to be as easy as possible.
A lender won’t have to pay, however, if it can prove the customer could not have got cover anywhere else.
The number of people who will get a payout is not known. While there are 14.2 million agreements identified by the FCA, the same person may have taken out more than one loan over the 17-year period.
More expensive car loans?
Despite the fact many lenders have to contribute to redress, the FCA said the market will continue to function and pointed out the sector has grown in recent years and months.
In delivering compensation quickly, the FCA said it “can ensure that some of the trust and confidence in the market can be repaired”.
It could not, however, rule out that the scheme could mean fewer offers and more expensive car loans, but failure to introduce a scheme would have been worse.
The FCA said: “We cannot rule out some modest impacts on product availability and prices, we estimate the cost of dealing with complaints would be several billion pounds higher in the absence of a redress scheme.
“In that scenario, impacts on access to motor finance and prices for consumers could be significantly higher with uncertainty continuing for many more years.”
Sir Keir Starmer has begun the first full-blown trade mission to India since Theresa May was prime minister, bringing 125 UK CEOs, entrepreneurs and university leaders to Mumbai.
The prime minister flew on a plane with dozens of Britain’s most prominent business people, including bosses from BA, Barclays, Standard Chartered, BT and Rolls-Royce, for the two-day trip designed to boost ties between the two countries.
The agreement has yet to be implemented, with controversial plans to waive national insurance for workers employed by big Indian businesses sent to the UK still the subject of a forthcoming consultation.
Speaking to journalists on the plane on the way out, the prime minister said he was determined to boost ties between the two countries.
The trip has been arranged to coincide with the Conservative Party conference, with the first day of meetings coinciding with Kemi Badenoch’s speech to activists in Manchester.
However, the business delegation is likely to use the trip to lobby the prime minister not to put more taxes on them in the November budget.
Sir Keir has already turned down the wish of some of the CEOs on the trip to increase the number of visas.
“The visa situation hasn’t changed with the free trade agreement, and therefore we didn’t open up more visas,” he said.
He told business that it wasn’t right to focus on visas, telling them: “The issue is not about visas. It’s about business-to-business engagement and investment and jobs and prosperity coming into the United Kingdom.”
Image: Narendra Modi and Keir Starmer during a press conference in July. Pic: PA
The prime minister sidestepped questions about Mr Modi’s support of Russian leader Vladimir Putin, whom he wished happy birthday on social media. US President Donald Trump has increased tariffs against India, alleging that Indian purchases of Russian oil are supporting the war in Ukraine.
Asked about Mr Modi wishing Mr Putin happy birthday, and whether he had leverage to talk to Mr Modi about his relationship with Russia, Sir Keir sidestepped the question.
“Just for the record, I haven’t… sent birthday congratulations to Putin, nor am I going to do so,” he said. “I don’t suppose that comes as a surprise. In relation to energy, and clamping down on Russian energy, our focus as the UK, and we’ve been leading on this, is on the shadow fleet, because we think that’s the most effective way. We’ve been one of the lead countries in relation to the shadow fleet, working with other countries.”
Sir Keir refused to give business leaders any comfort about the budget and tax hikes, despite saying in his conference speech he recognised the last budget had an impact.
“What I acknowledged in my conference and I’ve acknowledged a number of times now, is we asked a lot of business in the last budget. It’s important that I acknowledge that, and I also said that that had helped us with growth and stabilising the economy,” he added. “I’m not going to make any comment about the forthcoming budget, as you would expect; no prime minister or chancellor ever does.”
Asked if too many wealthy people were leaving London, he said: “No. We keep a careful eye on the figures, as you would expect.
“The measures that we took at the last budget are bringing a considerable amount of revenue into the government which is being used to fix things like the NHS. We keep a careful eye on the figures.”
Up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700 in compensation due to car loan mis-selling, the financial services regulator has said.
Nearly half (44%) of all car loan agreements made since April 2007 up to November 2024 could be eligible for payouts, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.
Those eligible for the compensation will have had a loan where the broker received commission from a lender.
Lenders broke the law by not sharing this fact with consumers, the FCA said, and customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.
A scheme is seen by the FCA as the best outcome for consumers and lenders, as it avoids the courts and the Financial Ombudsman Service, therefore minimising delay, uncertainty and administration costs.
Anyone who may have been impacted has been advised to complain to the institution that lent them the money.
The scheme will be funded by the dozens of lenders involved in the loans, and cost about £8.2bn, on the lower end of expectations, which had been expected to reach as much as £18bn.
More from Money
The figure was reached by estimating 85% of eligible applicants will take part in the scheme.
Anyone who believes they have been impacted should contact their lender. Compensation will begin to be paid in 2026, with an exact timeline yet to be worked out.