Government ministers have been outspoken and unequivocal in their outrage at the decision to ban Maccabi Tel Aviv fans from Aston Villa.
The prime minister immediately described it as “wrong”, his spokesperson later describing Sir Keir Starmer as “angered”.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy and Communities Secretary Steve Reed were all involved in urgent conversations on Friday.
They pledged to do “everything in our power to ensure all fans can safely attend the game”, next month with clear promises of additional resources and support if needed.
“We cannot have a situation where any area is a no-go area for people of a particular religion or from a particular country,” he said.
“We’ve got to stamp out all forms of prejudice, antisemitism, Islamophobia, wherever we find them.”
But astonishingly, three days after the announcement and despite the evident frustration from ministers, there’s still no movement.
On Sunday, Ed Miliband was still unable to guarantee the game would go ahead, telling Sir Trevor: “I’m not going to say come what may, but I’m giving you a very, very clear indication of what we are working towards, which is that the fans from both teams can attend the match.”
Image: Miliband says nowhere can be ‘no-go area for Jews’
Conservatives smell weakness
It makes the government look utterly weak. And the Tories have smelt blood.
Accusing the prime minister of weakness is a regular line of attack from Kemi Badenoch – amplified over the past six months by first the welfare reform debacle, then the PM’s ill-advised defence of Peter Mandelson, and most recently the collapse of the China spy trial.
Now the Tories are piling in to highlight his apparent impotence in the face of yet another controversy.
“What the actual hell,” shadow education secretary Laura Trott wrote on social media.
“The PM & home secretary need to get a grip. This is not a one-off event, it is a pattern of behaviour towards Jewish people we see with the Met.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:35
Miliband on Israeli football fan ban
Shadow energy secretary Claire Countinho told Sir Trevor the situation is a “disgrace”, highlighting the successful policing of large-scale pro-Palestine marches and the Notting Hill carnival.
She questioned why the Home Office had not stepped in when it became aware that banning away fans was an option under consideration earlier last week (the Home Office insists the home secretary was only informed the decision had been taken on Thursday night, along with everyone else).
The fact of the matter is that the police are operationally independent of government – and at the moment the West Midlands force is sticking to its assessment that allowing the match to go ahead as originally planned would be “high risk”.
It’s unclear why that risk could not be reduced by an influx of additional resources, and perhaps it will be.
We understand the issue is set to be discussed by the safety committee of council officials and the emergency services behind the original decision next week.
She accused them of applying “double standards” and “playing favourites”, treating far-right marchers and football hooligans more harshly than pro-Palestinian and BLM protesters.
That intervention caused such anger amongst the police and in Number 10, which had advised her to tone down her article, that she lost her job.
So far, politicians have avoided overtly criticising West Midlands Police, but rather the banning decision based on its risk assessment.
It’s a nuanced distinction.
Ed Miliband was careful not to accuse the police or council of antisemitism earlier, telling Sir Trevor: “The police’s concern will be around public order and public safety. I’m sure that’s what the local authority concern is.”
But he immediately went on to criticise its current plan of action.
“What we can’t do – and this is why it’s important to do everything we can to make sure the match can go ahead with fans of all teams – is make any, any set of people from any race, from any religion, from any ethnic background, feel unwelcome in Britain,” Mr Miliband said.
The UK Football Policing Unit has pushed back at the wave of political criticism, saying it’s “important that we respect and support the structures in place for making these decisions”.
But with each day that passes, the negative headlines continue, the Tory attacks gain momentum, and the Jewish community the PM also promised to protect with “everything in his power” feel more betrayed.
You know bad economic news is looming when a Chancellor of the Exchequer tries to get their retaliation in first.
Treasury guidance on Tuesday afternoon that Rachel Reeves has prioritised easing the cost of living had to be seen in the light of inflation figures, published this morning, and widely expected to rise above 4% for the first time since the aftermath of the energy crisis.
In that context the fact consumer price inflation in September remained level at 3.8% counts as qualified good news for the Treasury, if not consumers.
The figure remains almost double the Bank of England target of 2%, the rate when Labour took office, but economists at the Bank and beyond do expect this month to mark the peak of this inflationary cycle.
That’s largely because the impact of higher energy prices last year will drop out of calculations next month.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:27
Inflation sticks at 3.8%
The small surprise to the upside has also improved the chances of an interest rate cut before the end of the year, with markets almost fully pricing expectations of a reduction to 3.75% by December, though rate-setters may hold off at their next meeting early next month.
September’s figure also sets the uplift in benefits from next April so this figure may improve the internal Treasury forecast, but at more than double the rate a year ago it will still add billions to the bill due in the new year.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:13
Minister ‘not happy with inflation’
For consumers there was good news and bad, and no comfort at all from the knowledge that they face the highest price increases in Europe.
Fuel prices rose but there was welcome relief from the rate of food inflation, which fell to 4.5% from 5.1% in August, still well above the headline rate and an unavoidable cost increase for every household.
The chancellor will convene a meeting of cabinet ministers on Thursday to discuss ways to ease the cost of living and has signalled that cutting energy bills is a priority.
The easiest lever for her to pull is to cut the VAT rate on gas and electricity from 5% to zero, which would reduce average bills by around £80 but cost £2.5bn.
More fundamental reform of energy prices, which remain the second-highest in Europe for domestic bill payers and the highest for industrial users, may be required to bring down inflation fast and stimulate growth.
Schools need to be “brave enough” to talk about knives, Sky News has been told, as the killer of Sheffield teenager Harvey Willgoose is sentenced today.
His killer, who was also 15 and cannot be identified for legal reasons, had brought a 13cm hunting knife into school.
Image: Harvey Willgoose. Pic: Sophie Willgoose
Following Harvey’s murder, his parents Caroline and Mark Willgoose told Sky News they wanted to see knife arches in “all secondary schools and colleges”.
“It’s 100% a conversation, I think, that we need to be empowered and brave enough to have,” says Katie Crook, associate vice principal of Penistone Grammar School.
The school, which teaches 2,000 pupils, is just a few miles away from where Harvey was killed.
After being contacted by the Willgoose family, it has decided to install a knife arch.
More on Education
Related Topics:
The arch – essentially a walk-through metal detector – has been described as a “reassuring tool” and “real success” by school leaders.
“We’re really lucky here that we don’t have a knife crime problem – but we are on the forefront with safeguarding initiatives,” says Mrs Crook.
“I didn’t really think we needed one at first,” says Izzy, 14. “But then I guess at Harvey’s school they wouldn’t think that either and then it did actually happen.”
Joe, 15, says he did find the knife arch “intimidating” at first.
“But after using it a couple of times,” he says, “it’s just like walking through a doorway”.
“And it’s that extra layer of, like, you feel secure in school.”
After Harvey’s death, then home secretary Yvette Cooper said that she would support schools in the use of knife arches.
But there remains no official government policy or national guidance on their use.
Some headteachers who spoke with Sky News feel knife arches aren’t the answer – saying the issue required a societal approach.
Others said knife arches themselves were a significant expense to schools.
But Mrs Crook says they are “well worth the funding” if they prevent “a student making a catastrophic decision”.
“I’m a parent and, of course, my focus every day is keeping our students safe, just as I want my son to be kept safe in his setting and his school.”
Mrs Crook says she thinks schools would “welcome” a discussion at “national level” about the use of knife arches and other knife-related deterrents in schools.
“It’s sad, though that this is what it’s come to, that we’re having lockdown drills in the UK, in our school settings.
“But I suppose some might argue that has been needed for a long time.”
If you eat beef, and ever stop to wonder where and how it’s produced, Jonathan Chapman’s farm in the Chiltern Hills west of London is what you might imagine.
A small native herd, eating only the pasture beneath their hooves in a meadow fringed by beech trees, their leaves turning to match the copper coats of the Ruby Red Devons, selected for slaughter only after fattening naturally during a contented if short existence.
But this bucolic scene belies the turmoil in the beef market, where herds are shrinking, costs are rising, and even the promise of the highest prices in years, driven by the steepest price increase of any foodstuff, is not enough to tempt many farmers to invest.
For centuries, a symbolic staple of the British lunch table, beef now tells us a story about spiralling inflation and structural decline in agriculture.
Mr Chapman has been raising beef for just over a decade. A former champion eventing rider with a livery yard near Chalfont St Giles, the main challenge when he shifted his attention from horses to cows was that prices were too low.
“Ten years ago, the deadweight carcass price for beef was £3.60 a kilo. We might clear £60 a head of cattle,” he says. “The only way we could make the sums add up was to process and sell the meat ourselves.”
Processing a carcass doubles the revenue, from around £2,000 at today’s prices to £4,000. That insight saw his farm sprout a butchery and farm shop under the Native Beef brand. Today, they process two animals a week and sell or store every cut on site, from fillet to dripping.
More on Farming
Related Topics:
Today, farmgate prices are nearly double what they were in 2015 at £6.50 a kilo, down slightly from the April peak of almost £7, but still up around 25% in a year.
For consumers that has made paying more than £5 for a pack of mince the norm. For farmers, rising prices reflect rising costs, long-term trends, and structural changes to the subsidy regime since Brexit.
“Supply and demand is the short answer,” says Mr Chapman.
“Cow numbers have been falling roughly 3% a year for the last decade, probably in this country. Since Brexit, there is virtually no direct support for food in this country. Well over 50% of the beef supply would have come from the dairy herd, but that’s been reducing because farmers just couldn’t make money.”
Political, environmental and economic forces
Beef farmers also face the same costs of trading as every other business. The rise in employers’ national insurance and the minimum wage have increased labour costs, and energy prices remain above the long-term average.
Then there is the weather, the inescapable variable in agriculture that this year delivered a historically dry summer, leaving pastures dormant, reducing hay and silage yields and forcing up feed costs.
Native Beef is not immune to these forces. Mr Chapman has reduced his suckler herd from 110 to 90, culling older cows to reduce costs this winter. If repeated nationally, the full impact of that reduction will only be fully clear in three years’ time, when fewer calves will reach maturity for sale, potentially keeping prices high.
That lag demonstrates one of the challenges in bringing prices down.
Basic economics says high prices ought to provide an opportunity and prompt increased supply, but there is no quick fix. Calves take nine months to gestate and another 20 to 24 months to reach maturity, and without certainty about price, there is greater risk.
There is another long-term issue weighing on farmers of all kinds: inheritance tax. The ending of the exemption for agriculture, announced in the last budget and due to be imposed from next April, has undermined confidence.
Neil Shand of the National Beef Association cites farmers who are spending what available capital they have on expensive life insurance to protect their estates, rather than expanding their herds.
“The farmgate price is such that we should be in an environment that we should be in a great place to expand, there is a market there that wants the product,” he says. “But the inheritance tax challenge has made everyone terrified to invest in something that will be more heavily taxed in the future.”
While some of the issues are domestic, the UK is not alone.
Beef prices are rising in the US and Europe too, but that is small consolation to the consumer, and none at all to the cow.