Connect with us

Published

on

After two action-packed games at Rogers Centre in Toronto, the 2025 World Series shifts to Los Angeles’ Dodger Stadium for Game 3 on Monday night.

Will coming home help the Dodgers take control or will the Blue Jays regain the Series lead on the road? What has impressed us most so far, and what must each team do to take control of the series from here?

Our MLB experts break down what we’ve seen so far and what it means for the rest of this Fall Classic.

Who is the two-game MVP of this World Series — and will he win the award when all is said and done?

Jorge Castillo: Addison Barger‘s grand slam in Game 1 will be remembered in Canada for a very long time, but what Yoshinobu Yamamoto accomplished in Game 2 might have saved the Dodgers’ title hopes. The right-hander was utterly dominant again, becoming the first pitcher since Curt Schilling in 2001 to toss consecutive complete games in the postseason. The Dodgers must avoid overexposing their bullpen. Yamamoto ensured that happened in Game 2.

Jeff Passan: Yamamoto is the early favorite and has the inside track, though that depends on how deep the series goes. At earliest, Yamamoto would start Game 6 — and that would come on five days’ rest, which he last had going into his first complete game against Milwaukee in the National League Championship Series. Don’t sleep on Will Smith, though. A go-ahead homer in Game 2. Great at-bats. No strikeouts in the first two games. On the Blue Jays’ side, Alejandro Kirk‘s stalwart Game 1 and tremendous defense give him a solid foundation on which he can build.

Alden Gonzalez: I’ll go with Smith, who guided Yamamoto through his Game 2 masterpiece and, along with Kirk, has been the best offensive performer through these first two games. Smith’s impact is especially notable given (1) the hairline fracture he was still recovering from entering these playoffs and (2) how clearly worn down he was by this point last year. The Dodgers promoted rookie Dalton Rushing earlier than expected this season in an effort to keep Smith fresh down the stretch. A late-season hand injury could have derailed those plans, but Smith seems to be at his best at the moment — a crucial development for a Dodgers offense that has struggled as a whole since the wild-card round.

What surprised you most during the first two games in Toronto, and should we expect it to continue in Los Angeles?

Castillo: The Blue Jays’ bullpen — widely regarded as a significant weakness — continuing to log quality innings. Toronto’s relief corps allowed four runs over 7⅓ innings over the first two games. Two of those runs came after the Blue Jays built an 11-2 lead in Game 1, on a home run from Shohei Ohtani. They weren’t lights-out performances, but they were encouraging as Toronto looks to piece together three more wins.

Passan: The mediocrity at the top of Los Angeles’ lineup. Ohtani, Mookie Betts and Freddie Freeman are a combined 4-for-21 with four runs and two RBIs — both of which came from a garbage-time Ohtani homer in the Game 1 blowout. It hasn’t been a particularly great postseason for any of the Dodgers’ stars. Ohtani’s six home runs are excellent, of course, but he’s 5-for-43 with 19 strikeouts in his other at-bats. Betts is homerless and has scored only three runs in 12 games. Last year, Freeman entered the World Series with one RBI — and then drove in 12 against New York. This year, Freeman entered the World Series with one RBI — and didn’t knock in a run in either game against Toronto.

Gonzalez: The handling of Bo Bichette — that he started Game 1 at second base, a position he’d never played in the major leagues, and, to a lesser extent, that he wasn’t in the lineup for Game 2. Bichette has spent these past seven weeks recovering from a left knee sprain, and though he’s clearly not yet fully healed, he has proven to be viable nonetheless, even entering in the late stages of Game 2. The Blue Jays clearly wanted Bichette in the lineup for Game 1 against a lefty in Blake Snell. And though the rest of the Dodgers’ rotation is right-handed, Bichette is clearly going to factor into this series. Blue Jays manager John Schneider said he’ll be in the lineup against Tyler Glasnow in Game 3, which follows a day off.

What do you expect from starting pitchers Max Scherzer and Tyler Glasnow in Game 3?

Castillo: Glasnow will continue his postseason success at home, while Scherzer will have a more difficult time in his return to Los Angeles four years after pitching in the postseason for the Dodgers. Glasnow has held opponents to one run over 11⅔ innings in his two playoff starts — both at Dodger Stadium. In August, he limited Toronto to two runs on four hits across 5⅔ innings in Los Angeles. On the other side, Scherzer delivered a crucial performance for the Blue Jays in Game 4 of the American League Championship Series in Seattle with his team trailing 2-1 in the series. The Dodgers’ offense has mostly struggled in the playoffs, but it’s only a matter of time before it erupts. It’ll be a stiff test for Scherzer.

Passan: Among MLB pitchers with at least 90 innings this year, Glasnow had the fifth-most-valuable curveball on a per-pitch basis. And considering the Dodgers leaned heavily on the curve in the first two games, Glasnow spinning it early and often could be a big part of the game plan. Scherzer, likewise, found success with his curve in his last start 11 days ago, though his fastball — which sat at 94 mph and topped out at a season-high 96.5 — proved an effective offering as well. Most important for Scherzer is keeping the ball in the stadium. He allowed 19 home runs in 85 innings, the second-highest rate among the 158 pitchers who threw at least 80 innings this season.

Gonzalez: If Glasnow’s mechanics are properly synced up — and that’s often a question for someone who’s 6-foot-8 with a lot of moving parts — I expect this to be the most lopsided pitching matchup of this series. Scherzer is a first-ballot Hall of Famer, up there with Justin Verlander and Clayton Kershaw among the defining pitchers of this era. And if Scherzer’s ALCS performance showed anything, it’s that, even at 41 years old, he should never be counted out. But the Dodgers know him well, having seen him as recently as two months ago, and this version of Scherzer is the type of pitcher their slumping offense can come alive against — especially at home.

What must the Dodgers do to take control of this series on their home field?

Castillo: They need their starters to continue pitching deep into games. The Blue Jays exposed the Dodgers’ biggest weakness — the bullpen — in Game 1, and Yamamoto didn’t let that happen again. Complete games aren’t required, but completing at least six innings greatly increases the Dodgers’ chances of winning.

Passan: Do what no team has managed to this postseason: strike out Blue Jays hitters. The Dodgers have done so at a slightly higher rate than Toronto’s previous opponents, but the Jays have taken a number of excellent at-bats already in the series’ first two games, and the key for Glasnow will be to avoid two-strike nibbling and go right for the punchout. Los Angeles’ bullpen is not exactly filled with high-strikeout options — their 6.75 strikeouts per nine are 10th of the 12 playoff teams — so the onus will be on Glasnow, Ohtani and, presumably, Snell to generate swing-and-miss over the next three games at Dodger Stadium.

Gonzalez: Get their offense going. The Dodgers are slashing .216/.307/.359 since the wild-card round, averaging a mere 3.7 runs per game (it was 5.1 during the regular season). Their starting pitchers have masked a lot of the offense’s deficiencies of late, and it’s tough to count on that continuing against a Blue Jays offense this explosive. Los Angeles’ three best hitters, in particular, need to get going. Ohtani has hit four home runs over these past three rounds, three of which came in the pennant clincher, but he has otherwise been unproductive offensively. Betts and Freeman, meanwhile, have combined to slash just .197/.307/.329 since the wild-card round.

What must the Blue Jays do to regain the series lead on the road?

Castillo: Recreate what happened in Game 1, when they forced Blake Snell to throw 29 pitches in the first inning and didn’t relent. Snell exited with the bases loaded and no outs in the sixth after 100 pitches. From there, the Blue Jays pounded Los Angeles’ Emmet Sheehan and Anthony Banda in a historic nine-run inning. They were the best in baseball at making contact and avoiding strikeouts. Grinding Dodgers starters down is their path to victory.

Passan: Keep playing clean ball. The Blue Jays last committed an error in Game 2 of the ALCS, 67 innings ago, and in order to beat a team as talented as the Dodgers, you need to treat every out as the precious commodity it is. Toronto got here with a potent offense, elite bat-to-ball skills and exceptional glovework. And even if scoring runs is the most important element to its success, continuing to turn batted balls into outs will assist in its efforts to avoid the fate of the Yankees in the last World Series.

Gonzalez: When the Dodgers cruised past Milwaukee in the NLCS, their four starting pitchers and two best relievers, Roki Sasaki and Alex Vesia, accounted for all but nine of their outs. Their formula is obvious, and not having Vesia for the World Series constitutes a major obstacle. The Blue Jays, as Jorge said, need to run up the Los Angeles starters’ pitch counts. And so Toronto’s goal is simple: force a reliever not named Sasaki to take down at least two innings in each of these next three games. If that happens, Toronto should be in good shape.

Continue Reading

Sports

Kiffin trolls Venables over Ole-Miss-OU ‘hot take’

Published

on

By

Kiffin trolls Venables over Ole-Miss-OU 'hot take'

Lane Kiffin could not resist taking a shot at Brent Venables, sarcastically accusing the Oklahoma coach of a “hot take” in his evaluation of last weekend’s game against Ole Miss.

Kiffin and the seventh-ranked Rebels rallied for a 34-26 victory Saturday in Norman, Oklahoma, against Venables and the Sooners. Venables said Sunday that he thought Oklahoma was “the better team” before conceding that Ole Miss “out-executed us.”

“That’s an interesting take. That’s a hot take [that] they have the better team,” Kiffin said Monday when asked about Venables’ comments. “I wouldn’t have thought that people watching would say that.

“I felt that one, we won at their place in weather that — as a defensive head coach — you would normally wish for, and won by eight points. And I think we left a lot out there. I think we should have won by a couple of scores. So I don’t know how he evaluated that game that they were the better team.”

Kiffin cited Ole Miss’ 26-14 victory last season at home against Oklahoma before mentioning other previous games he has coached against Venables’ teams.

“Maybe they had the better team last year, too, when we beat them,” said Kiffin, who shrugged before apologizing for interrupting a reporter’s follow-up question. “Sorry … maybe he had the better team in Oklahoma, when we beat him 55-19 in the national championship — maybe.

“Maybe he had the better team at Clemson, when we beat him 45-40 in the national championship at Alabama. Next question, my bad.”

Kiffin was an assistant under Pete Carroll at USC when the Trojans beat the Sooners for the national title after the 2004 season. Venables was a defensive assistant on that Oklahoma team.

The coaches squared off again for the national championship 11 years later, when Kiffin was the offensive coordinator for the Nick Saban-coached Alabama team that beat Clemson for the NCAA title after the 2015 season. Venables was the Tigers’ defensive coordinator that year.

Kiffin’s Rebels were successful offensively Saturday against the Sooners, finishing with 431 yards of total offense against a Venables-coached team that led the nation in total defense and ranked second in scoring defense heading into the weekend.

“We had way more yards, 21 first downs to 14, and we played 87 plays of offense and they had one sack and didn’t force any turnovers,” Kiffin said. “That’s an interesting take. But whatever he needs to say.”

Ole Miss is scheduled to visit Oklahoma again next season. The Rebels (7-1, 4-1 SEC) host South Carolina in their next game Saturday, while the Sooners (6-2, 2-2) visit No. 14 Tennessee.

Continue Reading

Sports

Sankey asks NCAA to rescind betting rule change

Published

on

By

Sankey asks NCAA to rescind betting rule change

The SEC has asked the NCAA to rescind a pending rule change that will allow athletes and athletic department staff members to bet on professional sports beginning on Nov. 1, according to a copy of a memo obtained by ESPN.

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey sent a letter to NCAA president Charlie Baker on Oct. 25, stating that during an Oct. 13 conference meeting, “The message of our Presidents and Chancellors was clear and united: this policy change represents a major step in the wrong direction.”

Last week, the NCAA’s Division I cabinet approved a rule change to allow betting on professional sports, and Division II and III management councils also signed off on it, allowing it to go into effect on Saturday. NCAA athletes are still prohibited from betting on college sports and sharing information about college sports with bettors. Betting sites also aren’t allowed to advertise or sponsor NCAA championships.

“On behalf of our universities, I write to urge action by the NCAA Division I Board of Directors to rescind this change and reaffirm the Association’s commitment to maintaining strong national standards that keep collegiate participants separated from sports wagering activity at every level,” Sankey wrote. “If there are legal or practical concerns about the prior policy, those should be addressed through careful refinement — not through wholesale removal of the guardrails that have long supported the integrity of games and the well-being of those who participate.”

If the rule goes into effect, it would mark a shift in a long-held policy that had become difficult to enforce with an increase in legal sports betting in the United States. The NCAA has faced an uptick in alleged betting violations by players in recent years. In September, the NCAA announced that a Fresno State men’s basketball player had manipulated his own performance for gambling purposes and conspired with two other players in a prop betting scheme. The NCAA is investigating 13 additional players from six schools regarding potential gambling violations dealing with integrity issues.

On Oct. 22, when the NCAA announced the adoption of the new proposal, it stated that approving the rule change “is not an endorsement of sports betting, particularly for student-athletes.”

“Our action reflects alignment across divisions while maintaining the principles that guide college sports,” said Roberta Page, director of athletics at Slippery Rock and chair of the Division II Management Council, in the NCAA’s news release. “This change recognizes the realities of today’s sports environment without compromising our commitment to protecting the integrity of college competition or the well-being of student-athletes.”

Sankey wrote that the “integrity of competition is directly threatened when anyone with insider access becomes involved in gambling.” He also said the SEC is “equally concerned about the vulnerability of our student-athletes.”

“The SEC’s Presidents and Chancellors believe the NCAA should restore its prior policy-or a modified policy-communicating a prohibition on gambling by student-athletes and athletics staff, regardless of the divisional level of their sport,” Sankey wrote. “While developing and enacting campus or conference-level policy may be considered, the NCAA’s policy has long stood as an expression of our collective integrity, and its removal sends the wrong signal at a time when the gambling industry is expanding its reach and influence.”

ESPN’s Pete Thamel contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Sports

$168M owed to fired FBS head football coaches

Published

on

By

8M owed to fired FBS head football coaches

Former LSU coach Brian Kelly’s $54 million buyout would bring the amount of money owed to FBS head football coaches fired this season to $167.7 million, according to publicly available data and reports.

Kelly’s buyout, which is still being negotiated with LSU, is the highest of the 2025 season so far, topping the $49 million owed to Penn State‘s ex-coach James Franklin, who was fired on Oct. 12.

Also included in the $167.7 million:

  • $21 million for Billy Napier, fired from Florida Oct. 19.

  • $15 million for Mike Gundy, fired from Oklahoma State Sept 23.

  • $9.8 million owned to Sam Pittman, fired from Arkansas Sept. 28.

  • $6 million for Brent Pry, fired from Virginia Tech Sept. 14.

  • $5 million for DeShaun Foster, fired from UCLA Sept. 14.

  • $4 million for Trent Bray, fired from Oregon State Oct. 12.

  • $2.4 million for Trent Dilfer, fired from UAB Oct. 12.

  • $1.5 million for Jay Norvell, fired from Colorado State Oct. 19.

Buyout totals are subject to change in certain circumstances; for example, if Kelly or Franklin land new jobs, the schools that fired them owe them less money. Napier’s contract with Florida, on the other hand, did not include offset language, and half of his buyout is owed to him within 30 days of his firing.

Kelly’s buyout is the second largest in college football history, behind Texas A&M‘s record $76 million buyout of Jimbo Fisher in 2023. Both coaches were hired by current LSU athletic director Scott Woodward, who ran the Texas A&M athletic department from 2016 to 2019.

“We had high hopes that [Kelly] would lead us to multiple SEC and national championships during his time in Baton Rouge,” Woodward said when he announced the firing, which came a day after the Tigers’ 49-25 loss to Texas A&M. “Ultimately, the success at the level that LSU demands simply did not materialize, and I made the decision to make a change after last night’s game.

The $168.1 million applies to coaches who have been fired since the start of the 2025 season and does not include coaches who were fired over the offseason.

Continue Reading

Trending