Connect with us

Published

on

Another lawsuit has been filed against Tesla, alleging that poor door handle design in the 2016 Model S trapped five occupants after a crash, leading to their deaths. The lawsuit is filed among heightened public scrutiny of Tesla’s door handle designs.

The lawsuit stems from a 2024 crash in Wisconsin. A Model S driven by Barry Sievers veered off of a semi-rural road and crashed into a tree in Verona, Wisconsin, outside Madison. The Dane County Sheriff’s Office says multiple factors played a role in the crash, including road conditions, excess speed, and impaired driving.

A nearby resident was awakened by the sound of the crash, and called 911 to report that she had heard it. After providing details of the crash, she stated “the car is on fire now.” She also said that she heard screaming up to five minutes into the 911 call.

Four other passengers were inside the car, and all five occupants died after the crash. The lawsuit was filed by the families of Jeffrey Bauer and Michelle Bauer, who were riding in the car, in the front and rear seats respectively.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Plaintiffs allege that Tesla was negligent in the design of the vehicle, and that it did not incorporate certain safety features into the design of its door handles and battery pack that could have made the crash more survivable.

Lawsuit claims Tesla negligent in door handle design

Tesla vehicles use an electronic door release. Rather than having a mechanical attachment between the door handle and the door, the door handle release sends an electronic signal which then triggers the door release. This allows Tesla to make novel door handle designs, but also means that if the car loses power, the normal door handles aren’t operable.

Tesla does include mechanical door releases as a fallback, but these are in different places in each of their vehicles. Front door release is typically a lever in front of the window switches, whereas the rear door releases are under the map pocket in the Model 3Model Y and Cybertruck, or behind the speaker grille in the Model X.

On the 2016 Model S, Tesla did actually include a fallback mechanical door release for the front door handles. They would work electronically in most cases, but when the car had no power, the normal door handle would work mechanically.

However, the rear seat had an obscured mechanical release, under a piece of carpet under the rear seats. This is noted in the owners’ manual, but most passengers would not be aware of it.

In the case of this crash, the lawsuit alleges that the vehicle lost power, which made the door handles inoperable. It is unclear why the front door handles, which work mechanically when the car is without power, wouldn’t have operated.

The lawsuit claims that Tesla had heard repeated complaints about its door handles, and did not modify its design to something simpler or more robust in a crash.

It notes comments in 2025 from Tesla design chief Franz von Holzhausen stating that Tesla is working on combining electronic and mechanical releases into one button. It states that Tesla’s inclusion of a mechanical fallback on the original Model S suggests that they knew this would have been a good thing to do, yet did not provide a fallback for the rear doors (though it did for the front doors in this particular vehicle; again, it’s unclear why that didn’t work here, and the lawsuit seems to dance around the fact that these mechanical releases were included on the front doors of this vehicle). It also states that Tesla’s inclusion of a label on newer vehicles showing where the emergency door release is demonstrates that Tesla’s original designs lacked clarity.

Lawsuit claims Tesla’s battery lacked safety features included in later models

The lawsuit also claims that the 2016 Model S lacked safety features that it should have included, which were included in later models.

In particular, it says that there were not adequate firewalls or intumescent/fire-suppressive materials to isolate the spread of fire in a crash. These intumescent materials expand when heated to insulate and delay the spread of fire, and were included on the Model 3, which has seen fewer accidents like this as a result.

The lawsuit says that Tesla’s decisions on the Model S did not comply with UL and SAE recommendations for battery pack safety. These recommendations are voluntary standards, not legal ones.

Similar to the argument on door handles, the lawsuit says that Tesla’s inclusion of suppressant materials in later vehicles suggests that it recognized its error in not including them on earlier vehicles.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages against Tesla for negligence, and additional punitive damages “in an amount sufficient to punish Defendant Tesla for its egregious misconduct and to deter similar conduct in the future.” It also names the driver, suing him and his insurance company for negligence.

Electrek’s Take

This story feels like it’s much more about the door handles than the battery pack, to me. Besides, regardless of design, EVs on the whole are much less likely to catch fire than combustion-engined vehicles (I mean, combustion is right there in the name…).

The call from the nearby resident suggests that there may have been time between the crash and the fire starting, and the sound of screams suggests that occupants were alive for some time. All of this suggests that there should have been time for the occupants to get out of the vehicle – if they had a reliable way to exit the vehicle.

So, that leads us to the door handles, where Tesla has a poorly designed mechanical release in the rear, and it’s understandable that the passengers wouldn’t have been able to find that. But, the Model S does have a fallback mechanical release in the front doors, unlike most Tesla vehicles, and should have been operable in the event of a crash.

But anything can happen in a crash, so it’s possible the front seat occupants were both unconscious or otherwise unable to operate the doors, leaving the rear seat passengers trapped with their hidden door releases.

Concerns over Tesla’s door handle design have gotten louder over time, with recent scrutiny from governments and lawsuits. Tesla is currently being investigated by the NHTSA over its door handle design, an investigation which was just widened by the NHTSA last week. Tesla has confirmed that it is finally redesigning its handles, but we don’t know when that fix might be coming.

Elsewhere in the world, Chinese auto regulators are mulling a ban on retractable door handles, as many sleek new EVs have taken on the trend that Tesla started with its flush door handles.

And another lawsuit is currently pending against Tesla, filed last month over a crash which led to the death of 3 teens in a Cybertruck. The Cybertruck has no exterior door handles, which meant the car was inaccessible to a rescuer who was on the scene and had to bash through the car’s “armor glass” window to pull the one survivor out.

Given this widening chorus of calls for Tesla and other automakers to simplify their door handles, it sounds like change must be on the horizon.


The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Mercedes-Benz tops 28,500 car hybrid battery test — THIS brand came in last

Published

on

By

Mercedes-Benz tops 28,500 car hybrid battery test — THIS brand came in last

When it comes to battery longevity, it appears that brand matters. A recent study published by Germany’s ADAC revealed tangible, real-world differences in how the high-voltage batteries in PHEVs age across manufacturers. The results: Mercedes’ batteries came out on top, Mitsubishi trailed behind.

A recent study by the German motoring group ADAC (think of it as Germany’s equivalent of America’s AAA) and data analysts at Austrian battery firm AVILOO analyzed more than 28,500 state-of-health (SoH) measurements from plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) across six years and several vehicle brands. While the study found that battery degradation for most brands remains within a range consistent with an average vehicle lifespan, it turns out that one of the strongest predictors of battery longevity was the brand of vehicle tested.

In other words: not all hybrid batteries are created equal, and it seems like you really do seem to get what you pay for with batteries from traditionally pricer brands like Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Volvo out-performing those from mainstream car brands like VW, Ford, and Mitsubishi. Here’s how ADAC broke it down:

In terms of brand comparison, Mercedes-Benz models generally show very stable battery performance up to a mileage of 200,000 kilometers. This contrasts with Mitsubishi, whose PHEVs already exhibit significant degradation even at low mileages, although this stabilizes somewhat over the course of their lifespan.

Battery degradation in vehicles from the Volkswagen Group and Volvo remains within an unremarkable range even with higher proportions of electric driving. BMW models show a noticeable variation across the entire field, depending on electric usage. In Ford models, battery capacity decreases remarkably early, regardless of the specific user group. However, predictions regarding battery condition at higher mileages are not possible due to the limited number of tests.

ADAC | GOOGLE TRANSLATE

So, what are the big takeaways here, besides the notion that more expensive products tend to be built better than cheaper ones? It seems like most PHEVs are maintaining more than 80% of their batteries’ SoH after 200,000 km (~120,000 miles), with some of the higher-performing batteries doing significantly better.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Still totally fine


Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
2024 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV; via Mitsubishi.

Again, the ADAC results shouldn’t be interpreted to mean that the Mitsubishi PHEV models aren’t perfectly serviceable, reliable offerings – just that some cars that cost a lot more than the Mitsubishi tend to have batteries that last a little longer under typical driving conditions.

ADAC also adds that, if frequent electric-only trips are on your agenda (as they are on mine), a fully battery-electric vehicle may be the smarter pick, as their batteries go through fewer charging cycles and tend to last longer than PHEV batteries as a consequence.

At the end of the day, it’s a straightforward choice: align your powertrain with your intended daily use, and your battery will have an easier, longer, and healthier life.

SOURCES: ADAC, AVILOO; via Motorpasión.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

First look at Honda’s new full-size electric motorcycle

Published

on

By

First look at Honda's new full-size electric motorcycle

At EICMA 2025, Honda finally pulled back the curtain on its first full-size electric motorcycle with the first-ever public unveiling of the Honda WN7. As someone who’s followed the electric motorcycle space for over a decade, I’ve been waiting a long time to see Big Red bring some serious voltage – and it looks like that moment has arrived.

The WN7 isn’t just a compliance bike or a modest scooter like we’ve seen for years from Honda – it’s a legitimate full-size motorcycle, albeit still a commuter motorcycle and not something you’d likely want to take on a cross-country trip.

Designed as a naked street bike in Honda’s “FUN” category, the WN7 features a peak output of 50 kW (67 hp), putting it in a similar performance class to a 600cc internal combustion motorcycle. With 100 Nm of torque, it even rivals liter-class bikes in terms of torque off the line, promising quick acceleration and agile city or highway handling.

Honda’s development team leaned into the EV strengths with a design philosophy they call “Be the wind.” The goal is apparently a ride experience that’s quiet and immersive, letting you hear the world around you while still delivering that satisfying EV torque hit.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Visually, the WN7 sports a sharp silhouette and a horizontal LED light bar up front – a design element Honda says will become the face of its entire electric lineup. It also features a new colorway exclusive to Honda’s EVs: a black body accented with golden mechanical components.

One of the most interesting engineering decisions is the frameless chassis. Instead of a traditional motorcycle frame, Honda uses the rigid aluminum battery case itself as a central structural element, connecting both the front steering head and the rear swingarm pivot directly to it. This design not only cuts weight but also improves handling by centralizing the mass. It’s a move we’re seeing more frequently, having been employed by other electric motorcycle makers such as LiveWire as part of their S2 Arrow platform.

Honda’s powertrain includes a new liquid-cooled motor with a built-in inverter, delivering its power to a belt-drive rear wheel through a newly designed gearbox. It’s quiet, clean, and torquey – just what you want in a commuter or light touring bike.

The moderately sized, fixed 9.3 kWh battery supports both CCS2 fast charging (20% to 80% in 30 minutes) and Type 2 charging, with a claimed range of 140 km (87 miles) per charge under WMTC standards. Riders also benefit from regenerative braking with customizable deceleration levels, as well as a slow-speed walk mode for precise parking assistance.

No word yet on pricing or exact market release dates, but Honda says the WN7 will be produced in Japan and rolled out in regions “where electrification is advancing.” Perhaps that could be a clue about its entry, or lack thereof, in North America.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

The “Anti Tesla” deal: Polestar 3 gets an $18,000 incentive offer for November

Published

on

By

The

Polestar may not yet be a household name, but these makers of objectively excellent, sporty EVs with Scandinavian sensibilities are doing everything they can to change that — including offering killer post-rebate deals set to take the fight to Tesla.

CarsDirect is reporting a MASSIVE $18,000 lease incentive on the sporty Polestar 3, which starts at around $67,500 for the Long Range Single Motor model and goes up to approximately $79,400 for the Long Range Dual Motor. For those of you like to see the math, that pencils out to ~25% discount from MSRP.

Nationally, the 2025 Polestar 3 features a $18,000 lease incentive. Customers who lease a 2025 Polestar 3 through Polestar Financial Services will receive the brand’s $18,000 Clean Vehicle Noncash Incentive. Customers who buy a 2025 Polestar 3 with cash or through standard financing can get $10,000 Polestar Clean Vehicle Incentive cash towards the purchase.

All Polestar 3 EVs currently offer 0% APR for up to 72 months on purchases plus a $7,500 financing bonus. This is the lowest rate we’ve seen since the vehicle’s launch, and it is now among the best 0% financing deals on an SUV.

CARSDIRECT

The EV deals don’t stop there. Polestar is offering both lease and finance customers who happen Costco members can get another $1,000 off the Polestar 3, making the Swedish/Chinese crossover one of the most compelling new car deals in the business.

Polestar 3 | For the money


Make the switch to Polestar. Save up to $20,000 on a Polestar 3 lease as a Tesla owner.
Polestar 3 showroom; via Polestar.

If you decide to take Polestar up on their offer, you’ll be getting a genuinely sporty five-seat entry-luxe SUV with a big battery and real, road trip-ready range.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

In the US the entry Polestar 3 Long-Range Single Motor (RWD) model starts at the previously-mentioned $67,500 MSRP (pre-rebate), and offers a 111 kWh battery pack good for an EPA-rated range of up to 350 miles. The top-shelf Performance-spec Polestar 3, meanwhile, offers an all-wheel-drive dual-motor setup that Polestar rates at 380 kW (~517 hp) that will launch you across suburbia with a 0–60 mph time in the 4 second range, albeit with slightly less range than the base model: “just” 275–315 mi, depending on wheels/trim.

The other thing a Polestar 3 offers is a bit of neutrality. Polestar hasn’t been shy about what it views as an “opportunity” to snatch up car buyers who want to distance themselves from Elon Musk and the political polarization that’s now associated with the Tesla brand.

The company’s CEO, German auto industry stalwart Michael Lohscheller, told Bloomberg, “For Germany, somebody outside of Germany endorsing right-wing political parties is a big thing. You want to know what I think about it? I think it’s totally unacceptable. Totally unacceptable. You just don’t do that. This is pure arrogance, and these things will not work.”

He’s hoping enough people agree to move the needle on Polestar sales in the US – and the first step to that is for consumers to get behind the wheel of this “masterfully tuned and sneaky-fast SUV,” and see if it’s a fit for them.

One thing is certain, though: at $18,000 less — the Polestar 3 is a lot more likely to be a fit for their budget than it was before! You can find out more about Polestar’s killer EV deals on the full range of Polestar models, from the 2 to the 4, below, then let us know what you think of the three-pointed star’s latest discount dash in the comments section at the bottom of the page.

SOURCE: CarsDirect; images via Polestar.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending