Connect with us

Published

on

Uptake of electric vehicles, solar panels and heat pumps and commitment to vegetarian diets remain strong – and in some cases is accelerating – even in the face of political attacks on climate policies, Sky News has found.

And fresh polling by YouGov, carried out exclusively for Sky News, also found that belief in and concern about man-made global warming remain as high as in their heyday in 2021, when the UK hosted the COP26 climate summit.

However, policies that come with cost or disruption appear to be shedding popularity in the polls, reflecting a split in Westminster about whether to sell net zero as the answer to or the reason for cash-strapped Britain’s woes.

Worried that both the public and right-leaning parties were falling out of love with net zero, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer dithered over whether to join leaders for climate talks in Brazil this year.

But he will today meet with President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and around 60 other leaders in the Amazonian city of Belem, ahead of the UN COP30 summit that begins on Monday.

The YouGov poll found 65% of adults remain “very” or “fairly worried” about climate change and its effects.

And 71% still think humans are to blame.

In an interview ahead of COP30, Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice, who previously said man-made climate change was “garbage”, admitted humans have “possibly” played a “modest” role.

Policies that don’t require people to put their hands in their pockets also remain popular, like tree-planting and taxing polluting companies.

However, people are losing their appetite for measures that come with a cost or disruption, like banning new petrol or diesel cars and a shift to renewable energy – as the cost of living bites.

Anthony Wiley, head of political research at YouGov, said several factors are likely at play.

“There will be something of a reversion to the norm after the publicity around COP26, there will also be the impact of the cost of living and the fading of elite political cues with the rise of Reform and the fading Tory commitment to net zero.”

But Sky News has analysed the data of what people are doing and finds uptake remains strong, and in some cases is even accelerating.

Hannah Ritchie, data scientist at Oxford University and Our World in Data, said it was “easy to say that you care about climate change, [but] one of the key markers is whether people are actually willing to go out and take action”.

A record 164,000 new battery and hybrid cars hit the road between January and March this year – the highest ever increase recorded for a single quarter.

The number of newly installed solar panels and heat pumps were also near previous peaks for both the first two quarters this year – albeit government subsidies for heat pumps are incentivising the uptake.

The same proportion of people eating vegetarian diets has remained effectively the same over the past five years.

Dr Ritchie said there has been a “huge shift in the feasibility, the accessibility, and the affordability of these low carbon switches that people will have to make”.

That means some people are buying clean technology for climate reasons, but others because it could save them money or they just prefer the technology.

This trend is also playing out in the United States, where Republican states have deployed far more wind power, whether due to geography, air pollution or economics, despite being more climate-sceptic than Democrat voters.

Environmental psychologist Lorraine Whitmarsh, from Bath University, said: “You don’t have to be worried about climate change to see… particularly in the context of energy prices going up, that actually becoming more energy self-sufficient is a really sensible economically rational thing to do.”

However, the majority of Britons still have petrol or diesel cars, gas boilers, and no solar panels – and national advisers warn many will need help with upfront costs so they can cash in on potential long-term savings.

Consensus on net zero collapses

The contradictions between polling support and action in the real world both reflect and fuel divisions between political parties over the UK’s net zero target, which is driving many of these policies.

It was not long ago that environmentalists thought cross-party support for net zero would last forever.

But that consensus went up in flames this year when the Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch announced she would scrap it altogether – hot on the heels of Reform UK, which has always been sceptical of climate policy.

Its voters are the least concerned about climate change, the exclusive YouGov polling found.

Mr Wiley said: “People often assume that voters choose their political parties based on their policies, but it’s as much the other way round – people like policies because they’ve been put forward by a party they support.”

Reform takes on ‘climate zealots’

Mr Tice told Sky News he is waging war on “climate zealots” – those who “keep telling us that the world’s going to end in a few years unless we get to net zero tomorrow”.

“All these people who… try and shove renewables down our throats with ever higher bills, and they don’t give a stuff about the thousands of jobs in British industry that are being slaughtered on the altar of net stupid zero,” he said in an interview before COP30.

Wind power has saved Britain £104bn over a 13-year period, a recent UCL study found. But tens of thousands of oil and gas workers are expected to lose their jobs in the next five years, and it is uncertain whether green jobs will be ready to take their place.

Pedalling another type of populism is the new Green Party leader Zack Polanski.

Instead of blaming net zero and renewables for why nobody has any money these days, he blames the “richest 1%”, and says climate action is the answer to our problems.

He told Sky News that Britain has the potential to create “millions of jobs that are about tackling the climate crisis”.

“We can clean up our air, we can bring communities together… move to a better world, that both tackles the climate crisis and the inequality crisis,” he said.

“These aren’t two things in opposition, they have the same solutions.”

Both messages are resonating somewhere.

Green Party membership doubled to 140,000 in just seven weeks after Polanski took over – perhaps nudging the prime minister to attend COP30 after all.

But Reform UK is riding highest in the polls, on course to win the next general election, according to another recent major YouGov survey.

And while its voters remain most concerned about immigration, there are signs that environment policy is becoming a more salient issue, researchers at thinktank More in Common have found.

Dr Ritchie is “sceptical” that the political attacks would filter down much into public opinion.

I think at the margins you will see some [people] shifting based on the kind of overarching political narrative between politicians,” she said.

But “increasingly there are other reasons beyond climate for people to make that switch and uptake low carbon behaviours”.

Even Mr Tice has bought solar panels and drives an electric car.

He told Sky News: “I love technology. I drive a Tesla, not because I think it will save the world – it won’t. But it’s a great piece of kit, okay?”

Continue Reading

UK

Congressional letter summons Andrew Mountbatten Windsor to US to explain Epstein links

Published

on

By

Congressional letter summons Andrew Mountbatten Windsor to US to explain Epstein links

The US Congress has written to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor requesting an interview with him in connection with his “long-standing friendship” with paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said it is investigating the late financier’s “sex trafficking operations”.

It told Andrew: “The committee is seeking to uncover the identities of Mr Epstein’s co-conspirators and enablers, and to understand the full extent of his criminal operations.

“Well-documented allegations against you, along with your long-standing friendship with Mr Epstein, indicate that you may possess knowledge of his activities relevant to our investigation.

“In the interest of justice for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, we request that you co-operate with the committee’s investigation by sitting for a transcribed interview with the committee.”

Read the letter in full

The congressional committee wants to understand any 'activities' relevant to its Epstein investigation. PA file pic
Image:
The congressional committee wants to understand any ‘activities’ relevant to its Epstein investigation. PA file pic

Virginia Giuffre, who died in April, accused Andrew of sexually assaulting her after being introduced by Epstein. Andrew has always vehemently denied her accusations.

More from UK

The letter to the former prince, is addressed to Royal Lodge, Windsor Great Park, the home he agreed last week to leave, when he was stripped of his royal titles.

It outlines his “close relationship” with Epstein and references a recently revealed 2011 email exchange in which Andrew told him “we are in this together”.

And it says the committee has identified “financial records containing notations such as ‘massage for Andrew’ that raise serious questions”.

Read more:
Andrew’s fall from grace
Can William escape Andrew questions in Brazil?

The committee said Andrew’s links to Epstein “further confirms our suspicion that you may have valuable information about the crimes committed by Mr Epstein and his co-conspirators”.

The letter, signed by 16 members of Congress, requested Andrew responds by 20 November.

It came as the King officially stripped his disgraced brother of both his HRH style and his prince title.

The move followed the publication Ms Giuffre’s posthumous memoirs, and the US government’s release of documents from the paedophile’s estate.

Ms Giuffre alleged she was forced to have sex with Andrew three times – once at convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell’s home in London, once in Epstein’s address in Manhattan, and once on the disgraced financier’s private island, Little St James.

The incident at Maxwell’s home allegedly occurred when Ms Giuffre was 17 years old.

Epstein took his own life in a New York prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.

Continue Reading

UK

Congress requests Andrew explain Jeffrey Epstein friendship – read letter in full

Published

on

By

Congress requests Andrew explain Jeffrey Epstein friendship - read letter in full

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor has been summoned by Congress to answer questions about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said it is investigating the late financier’s “sex trafficking operations”.

Andrew’s friendship with the paedophile has come under intense scrutiny in recent years and has led to him being stripped of his titles and made to leave his accommodation at Royal Lodge on the Windsor estate.

The memoir of Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s victims, was posthumously published last month and in it she alleged she had sex with Andrew three times while she was a teenager.

Andrew paid a settlement to Ms Giuffre in 2022 and has always denied wrongdoing. He has previously resisted calls to be summoned to the US.

Here is the letter in full:

We write to seek your cooperation in the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s (Committee) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operations. The Committee is seeking to uncover the identities of Mr. Epstein’s co-conspirators and enablers and to understand the full extent of his criminal operations.

More on Andrew Mountbatten Windsor

Well-documented allegations against you, along with your long-standing friendship with Mr. Epstein, indicate that you may possess knowledge of his activities relevant to our investigation. In the interest of justice for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, we request that you cooperate with the Committee’s investigation by sitting for a transcribed interview with the Committee.

It has been publicly reported that your friendship with Mr. Epstein began in 1999 and that you remained close through and after his 2008 conviction for procuring minors for prostitution.

It has also been reported that you traveled with Mr. Epstein to his New York residence, the Queen’s residence at Balmoral, and to Mr. Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where you have been accused of abusing minors.

This close relationship with Mr. Epstein, coupled with the recently revealed 2011 email exchange in which you wrote to him “we are in this together,” further confirms our suspicion that you may have valuable information about the crimes committed by Mr. Epstein and his co-conspirators.

As you are well aware, Virginia Roberts Giuffre made several allegations that you abused her when she was just 17 years old.

In her 2021 lawsuit, Ms. Giuffre alleged that she was forcibly “lent out” to you for sexual purposes on three separate occasions. In addition to these allegations, flight logs document several instances in which you were a passenger on Mr. Epstein’s plane between 1999 and 2006, while his criminal activities were ongoing.

In response to a subpoena issued to the Epstein estate, the Committee has identified financial records containing notations such as “massage for Andrew” that raise serious questions regarding the nature of your relationship with Mr. Epstein and related financial transactions.

In her posthumous memoir, Ms. Giuffre expressed a fear of retaliation if she made allegations against you, and writes that the settlement agreement you executed with her restricted her to one-year gag order designed to protect the Crown’s reputation.

Recent reporting confirms those fears, as law enforcement authorities in the United Kingdom have launched an investigation into allegations that you asked your personal protection officer to “dig up dirt” for a smear campaign against Ms. Giuffre in 2011.

This fear of retaliation has been a persistent obstacle to many of those who were victimized in their fight for justice. In addition to Mr. Epstein’s crimes, we are investigating any such efforts to silence, intimidate, or threaten victims, and are interested in any avenues that may further shed light on these activities.

Given these recent events and the appalling allegations that have come to light from Ms. Giuffre’s memoir and other reliable sources, the Committee requests that you make yourself available for a transcribed interview with the Committee and provide insight into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators.

Due to the urgency and gravity of this matter, we ask that you provide a response to the Committee’s interest by November 20, 2025.

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the principal oversight committee of the House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Committee Democratic staff at (202) 225-5051. Thank you for your prompt attention to this request.

The letter is signed by 16 members of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Continue Reading

UK

‘Significant hooliganism’ within Maccabi Tel Aviv fan base is reason for Aston Villa match ban

Published

on

By

'Significant hooliganism' within Maccabi Tel Aviv fan base is reason for Aston Villa match ban

Police have revealed to Sky News they banned Maccabi Tel Aviv fans from Aston Villa due to “significant levels of hooliganism” in the fan base jeopardising safety around the match – rather than threats to visiting Israelis.

This is the first time a West Midlands Police chief has publicly explained the intelligence behind the decision that was angrily opposed by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

The revelation to us comes after MPs on the Home Affairs Committee this week asked for police to explain the decision.

Excluding Israeli fans was portrayed by the government as antisemitic by turning part of Birmingham into a no-go zone for Thursday night’s Europa League match.

“We are simply trying to make decisions based on community safety, driven by the intelligence that was available to us and our assessment of the risk that was coming from admitting travelling fans,” Chief Superintendent Tom Joyce told Sky News.

“I’m aware there’s a lot of commentary around the threat to the [Maccabi] fans being the reason for the decision. To be clear, that was not the primary driver. That was a consideration.

“We have intelligence and information that says that there is a section of Maccabi fans, not all Maccabi fans, but a section who engage in quite significant levels of hooliganism.

More from UK

“What is probably quite unique in these circumstances is where as often hooligans will clash with other hooligans and it will be contained within the football fan base.

“We’ve had examples where a section of Maccabi fans were targeting people not involved in football matches, and certainly we had an incident in Amsterdam last year which has informed some of our decision-making.

“So it is exclusively a decision we made on the basis of the behaviour of a sub-section of Maccabi fans, but all the reaction that could occur obviously formed part of that as well.”

Maccabi’s match at Ajax last year saw attacks on Israeli fans condemned as antisemitic, leading to five people being convicted.

But there was also violence from supporters of the Israeli league champions, with anti-Arab chants.

Maccabi chief executive Jack Angelides on Wednesday said in a Sky News interview there were “blatant falsehoods” spread about the Amsterdam incident and complained about a lack of clarity over the ban from West Midlands Police.

“We are absolutely not saying that in Amsterdam that the only fans causing trouble were the Maccabi fans,” said Chief Superintendent Joyce.

“But what we were very clearly told is that they played a part in causing trouble particularly a day before the match.

“That absolutely resulted in following day there being attacks on Maccabi fans.

“So it wasn’t all one way, but… escalating violence as a consequence is what we were trying to prevent here in Birmingham.”

More than 700 police officers were being deployed for the match from around 10 forces across the country, with pro-Palestinian protests demanding a ban on Israeli teams from European football over the war in Gaza.

Ahead of the game anti-Israeli signs appeared on lampposts, including ones saying “Zionists not welcome” – a reference to those backing the existence of the Jewish state of Israel.

Asked about the phrase, Chief Superintendent Joyce said: “Our understanding is that they don’t quite contravene hate crime, but they’re acceptable as a matter of judgement.

“We’ve taken legal advice on whether it crosses the threshold to be a hate crime and our understanding is that it does not. And as with many of these things, there is often a question of degree at which something becomes lawful to unlawful and it’s a fine judgement.”

Continue Reading

Trending