Tesla CEO Elon Musk pushed back the dates for a demo of the next-gen Tesla Roadster, which he has said will be able to “fly” and suggested that it might not even be a car at all.
Tesla has been teasing the existence of a future, high-performance sportscar model for years now. Originally it was unveiled in 2017 for a 2020 release, but has been repeatedly pushed back, with another delay today.
Just last week, Musk said that a demo was coming at the end of the year of the Roadster, and that it would be perhaps the most exciting demo of any product ever. Musk also stated that the Roadster will have more tech than all James Bond vehicles combined
Today, he was asked a question at Tesla’s shareholder meeting about the status of that project (including whether the “James Bond” tech would make it to other Teslas – to which Musk responded “um, no”). Here’s the full answer regarding the product’s unveiling:
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The product unveil of the Roadster 2, which will be very different than what we’ve shown previously, that demo event will be April 1 of next year. I have some deniability because I can say I was just kidding. But we are actually tentatively aiming for April 1, for what I think will be the most exciting, whether it works or not, demo of any product. And then I guess production is probably about 12-18 months after that. I think production is about a year or so after that.
When the questioner seemed to respond with disbelief with that answer (who ever thought that this car could ever possibly be delayed?!), Musk answered:
Well, I can’t give away secrets, but you won’t be disappointed.
Musk also said, during the meeting, that owners of Founders’ Series reservations, which represent a $250,000 loan given to Tesla for the last 8 years, would all be invited to the demo.
So, this official announcement puts us back to a timeline of April 1 for the reveal, which is a delay of at least 3 months from when it was supposed to occur as of last week, and production starting (not cars hitting the road) at least in April 2027, or at late as potentially October 2027. If we take the higher end of that range, then the Roadster is likely to only be available in 2028, 11 years after its first unveiling and 8 years after original estimates.
That said, it’s not much of a surprise that the Roadster would be delayed again. Just last week, we saw a new job listing for the Roadster, looking for a “concept development” engineer. That’s a fairly early part of the production process, and even makes it seem like a 2027 release could be optimistic.
We’ve seen records set by the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra, built by a smartphone company from concept to production in just a couple years. We’ve seen the Rimac Nevera R get to 186mph faster than a Bugatti Chiron Super Sport. We’ve seen the Lotus Evija X, which set the third-fastest Nurburgring lap ever, only beaten by two one-off, track-only, purpose-built racecars (one of which is a hybrid, the other is electric). And we’ve seen the BYD Yangwang U9 Xtreme become the fastest production car ever at 308(!!!) miles per hour.
These are milestones that the Roadster might have been able to take a shot at, but time has passed it by, and others have stepped in in the Roadster’s absence.
But maybe that doesn’t matter, because Musk’s comments today suggest the Roadster might not be what we expected.
All along, it has been assumed that the Roadster will be something like the original version unveiled in 2017. But today, Musk said it will be “very different than what we’ve shown previously.” We don’t know what those differences entail – whether it just means the car will have new tech, or if it will be a completely different style of car.
We can imagine that anyone who gave Tesla a $250,000 loan for ten years might be bothered by ending up with a totally different bill of goods than they put their money down for, though, so we hope the plan is to at least keep it a sportscar.
There are some questions about whether these technologies Musk has mentioned will be on the car, though, and if they will be helpful for anything other than a demo if so.
But it is decidedly not a “flying car.” In fact, being able to fly would not actually help sportscar performance, and would actually hurt it. Sportscars are typically looking to maximize downforce in the most efficient manner, in order to enhance grip, but to fly, one must create “upforce,” which isn’t a term anyone uses because it creates no actual performance benefit.
So, while it is highly expected that the Roadster demo might be able to “fly,” we hope that doesn’t make it to production on a sportscar, as that’s more of a parlor trick and would take performance benefits away from where they would be more useful – like having a fan car system, or directional jets to increase lateral acceleration, rather than useless upwards acceleration.
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Pentagon-backed MP Materials warned investors this week to approach other rare earths projects with caution, pointing to the industry’s difficult economics.
Stocks of U.S. rare earth companies have had wild swings in recent months as investors have speculated that the Trump administration might strike more deals along the lines of its landmark agreement with MP. Smaller retail traders have gotten involved in the stocks with the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF up 60% this year.
The Defense Department in July took an equity stake in MP, set a price floor for the company, and inked an offtake agreement with the rare earth miner and magnet maker in an effort to roll back China’s dominance of the industry.
CEO James Litinsky said he didn’t want “people to get burned” amid the speculation. Litinsky cautioned investors “to just be very clear-eyed about what the actual structural economics are amidst all the excitement.”
“The vast majority of projects being promoted today simply will not work at virtually any price,” Litinksy said on the company’s third-quarter earnings call Thursday evening.
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, YTD
MP views itself as “America’s national champion,” Litinsky said. MP is the only active rare earth miner in the U.S. and has offtake agreements with Apple and General Motors in addition to the Pentagon.
“We have structural advantage because we’re fully vertically integrated,” the CEO said. “We’re years and billions ahead of others.”
It takes years for the best rare earth producers to ramp up and stabilize their output and economics “despite what some promoters might suggest,” Litinksy said. Australia’s Lynas took about a decade and MP will reach normalized production in about three years from the start of commissioning, he said.
The White House is “not ruling out other deals with equity stakes or price floors as we did with MP Materials, but that doesn’t mean every initiative we take would be in the shape of the MP deal,” a Trump administration official told CNBC in September.
Litinsky described the rare earth industry as close to a “structural oligopoly,” a system where there are just a few major players. The government investing in a dozens of sites and businesses wouldn’t necessarily set up a supply chain, he said.
The Trump administration should continue to encourage private capital to flow into the industry through loans, grants and other support, Litinsky said. There is room for “a lot of other players and supply” but the market will require “materially higher prices” for the industry’s structural challenges to change, he said.
“If X dollars of capital can stimulate two or three X in private capital, they should be doing that as much as possible,” Litinsky said.
The CEO indicated that he views MP as a forerunner that will help create the conditions for a broader market that is not dependent on China over time.
“In the very short term the administration has made sure that we have a successful national champion in MP,” Litinsky said. “We are going to sort of pave the path if you will to then figure out how there’s much broader supply coming online.”
Rare earths are crucial for making magnets that are key inputs in U.S. weapons platforms, semiconductor manufacturing, electric vehicles, clean energy technology and consumer electronics. Beijing dominates the global supply chain and the U.S. is dependent on China for imports.
This week on Electrek’s Wheel-E podcast, we discuss the most popular news stories from the world of electric bikes and other nontraditional electric vehicles. This time, that includes a new e-bike model from Tenways, California kills off its e-bike voucher program, a review of the new VMAX VX2 Hub e-scooter, Zero launches a scooter, NIU’s got a new micro-car, and more.
The Wheel-E podcast returns every two weeks on Electrek’s YouTube channel, Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter.
As a reminder, we’ll have an accompanying post, like this one, on the site with an embedded link to the live stream. Head to the YouTube channel to get your questions and comments in.
After the show ends, the video will be archived on YouTube and the audio on all your favorite podcast apps:
We also have a Patreon if you want to help us to avoid more ads and invest more in our content. We have some awesome gifts for our Patreons and more coming.
Here are a few of the articles that we will discuss during the Wheel-E podcast today:
Here’s the live stream for today’s episode starting at 9:00 a.m. ET (or the video after 10:00 a.m. ET):
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Nvidia has established itself as the undisputed leader in artificial intelligence chips, selling large quantities of silicon to most of the world’s biggest tech companies en route to a $4.5 trillion market cap.
One of Nvidia’s key clients is Google, which has been loading up on the chipmaker’s graphics processing units, or GPUs, to try and keep pace with soaring demand for AI compute power in the cloud.
While there’s no sign that Google will be slowing its purchases of Nvidia GPUs, the internet giant is increasingly showing that it’s not just a buyer of high-powered silicon. It’s also a developer.
On Thursday, Google announced that its most powerful chip yet, called Ironwood, is being made widely available in the coming weeks. It’s the seventh generation of Google’s Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU, the company’s custom silicon that’s been in the works for more than a decade.
TPUs are application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, which play a crucial role in AI by providing highly specialized and efficient hardware for particular tasks. Google says Ironwood is designed to handle the heaviest AI workloads, from training large models to powering real-time chatbots and AI agents, and is more than four times faster than its predecessor. AI startup Anthropic plans to use up to 1 million of them to run its Claude model.
For Google, TPUs offer a competitive edge at a time when all the hyperscalers are rushing to build mammoth data centers, and AI processors can’t get manufactured fast enough to meet demand. Other cloud companies are taking a similar approach, but are well behind in their efforts.
Amazon Web Services made its first cloud AI chip, Inferentia, available to customers in 2019, followed by Trainium three years later. Microsoft didn’t announce its first custom AI chip, Maia, until the end of 2023.
“Of the ASIC players, Google’s the only one that’s really deployed this stuff in huge volumes,” said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst covering semiconductors at Bernstein. “For other big players, it takes a long time and a lot of effort and a lot of money. They’re the furthest along among the other hyperscalers.”
Google didn’t provide a comment for this story.
Originally trained for internal workloads, Google’s TPUs have been available to cloud customers since 2018. Of late, Nvidia has shown some level of concern. When OpenAI signed its first cloud contract with Google earlier this year, the announcement spurred Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to initiate further talks with the AI startup and its CEO, Sam Altman, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.
Unlike Nvidia, Google isn’t selling its chips as hardware, but rather providing access to TPUs as a service through its cloud, which has emerged as one of the company’s big growth drivers. In its third-quarter earnings report last week, Google parent Alphabet said cloud revenue increased 34% from a year earlier to $15.15 billion, beating analyst estimates. The company ended the quarter with a business backlog of $155 billion.
“We are seeing substantial demand for our AI infrastructure products, including TPU-based and GPU-based solutions,” CEO Sundar Pichai said on the earnings call. “It is one of the key drivers of our growth over the past year, and I think on a going-forward basis, I think we continue to see very strong demand, and we are investing to meet that.”
Google doesn’t break out the size of its TPU business within its cloud segment. Analysts at D.A. Davidson estimated in September that a “standalone” business consisting of TPUs and Google’s DeepMind AI division could be valued at about $900 billion, up from an estimate of $717 billion in January. Alphabet’s current market cap is more than $3.4 trillion.
‘Tightly targeted’ chips
Customization is a major differentiator for Google. One critical advantage, analysts say, is the efficiency TPUs offer customers relative to competitive products and services.
“They’re really making chips that are very tightly targeted for their workloads that they expect to have,” said James Sanders, an analyst at Tech Insights.
Rasgon said that efficiency is going to become increasingly important because with all the infrastructure that’s being built, the “likely bottleneck probably isn’t chip supply, it’s probably power.”
On Tuesday, Google announced Project Suncatcher, which explores “how an interconnected network of solar-powered satellites, equipped with our Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) AI chips, could harness the full power of the Sun.”
As a part of the project, Google said it plans to launch two prototype solar-powered satellites carrying TPUs by early 2027.
“This approach would have tremendous potential for scale, and also minimizes impact on terrestrial resources,” the company said in the announcement. “That will test our hardware in orbit, laying the groundwork for a future era of massively-scaled computation in space.”
Dario Amodei, co-founder and chief executive officer of Anthropic, at the World Economic Forum in 2025.
Stefan Wermuth | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Google’s largest TPU deal on record landed late last month, when the company announced a massive expansion of its agreement with OpenAI rival Anthropic valued in the tens of billions of dollars. With the partnership, Google is expected to bring well over a gigawatt of AI compute capacity online in 2026.
“Anthropic’s choice to significantly expand its usage of TPUs reflects the strong price-performance and efficiency its teams have seen with TPUs for several years,” Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian said at the time of the announcement.
Google has invested $3 billion in Anthropic. And while Amazon remains Anthropic’s most deeply embedded cloud partner, Google is now providing the core infrastructure to support the next generation of Claude models.
“There is such demand for our models that I think the only way we would have been able to serve as much as we’ve been able to this year is this multi-chip strategy,” Anthropic Chief Product Officer Mike Krieger told CNBC.
That strategy spans TPUs, Amazon Trainium and Nvidia GPUs, allowing the company to optimize for cost, performance and redundancy. Krieger said Anthropic did a lot of up-front work to make sure its models can run equally well across the silicon providers.
“I’ve seen that investment pay off now that we’re able to come online with these massive data centers and meet customers where they are,” Krieger said.
Hefty spending is coming
Two months before the Anthropic deal, Google forged a six-year cloud agreement with Meta worth more than $10 billion, though it’s not clear how much of the arrangement includes use of TPUs. And while OpenAI said it will start using Google’s cloud as it diversifies away from Microsoft, the company told Reuters it’s not deploying GPUs.
Alphabet CFO Anat Ashkenazi attributed Google’s cloud momentum in the latest quarter to rising enterprise demand for Google’s full AI stack. The company said it signed more billion-dollar cloud deals in the first nine months of 2025 than in the previous two years combined.
“In GCP, we see strong demand for enterprise AI infrastructure, including TPUs and GPUs,” Ashkenazi said, adding that users are also flocking to the company’s latest Gemini offerings as well as services “such as cybersecurity and data analytics.”
Amazon, which reported 20% growth in its market-leading cloud infrastructure business last quarter, is expressing similar sentiment.
AWS CEO Matt Garman told CNBC in a recent interview that the company’s Trainium chip series is gaining momentum. He said “every Trainium 2 chip we land in our data centers today is getting sold and used,” and he promised further performance gains and efficiency improvements with Trainium 3.
Shareholders have shown a willingness to stomach hefty investments.
Google just raised the high end of its capital expenditures forecast for the year to $93 billion, up from prior guidance of $85 billion, with an even steeper ramp expected in 2026. The stock price soared 38% in the third quarter, its best performance for any period in 20 years, and is up another 17% in the fourth quarter.
Mizuho recently pointed to Google’s distinct cost and performance advantage with TPUs, noting that while the chips were originally built for internal use, Google is now winning external customers and bigger workloads.
Morgan Stanley analysts wrote in a report in June that while Nvidia’s GPUs will likely remain the dominant chip provider in AI, growing developer familiarity with TPUs could become a meaningful driver of Google Cloud growth.
And analysts at D.A. Davidson said in September that they see so much demand for TPUs that Google should consider selling the systems “externally to customers,” including frontier AI labs.
“We continue to believe that Google’s TPUs remain the best alternative to Nvidia, with the gap between the two closing significantly over the past 9-12 months,” they wrote. “During this time, we’ve seen growing positive sentiment around TPUs.”